RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In middle-income countries, poor physician-patient communication remains a recognized barrier to enhancing healthcare quality and patient satisfaction. This study investigates the influence of provider-patient communication skills on healthcare quality and patient satisfaction in the rural primary healthcare setting in China. METHODS: Data were collected from 504 interactions across 348 rural primary healthcare facilities spanning 21 counties in three provinces. Using the Standardized Patient method, this study measured physician-patient communication behaviors, healthcare quality, and patient satisfaction. Communication skills were assessed using the SEGUE questionnaire framework. Multivariate linear regression models and multivariate logistic regression models, accounting for fixed effects, were employed to evaluate the impact of physicians' communication skills on healthcare quality and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The findings indicated generally low provider-patient communication skills, with an average total score of 12.2 ± 2.8 (out of 24). Multivariate regression models, which accounted for physicians' knowledge and other factors, demonstrated positive associations between physicians' communication skills and healthcare quality, as well as patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). Heterogeneity analysis revealed stronger correlations among primary physicians with lower levels of clinical knowledge or more frequent training. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the importance of prioritizing provider-patient communication skills to enhance healthcare quality and patient satisfaction in rural Chinese primary care settings. It recommends that the Chinese government prioritize the enhancement of provider-patient communication skills to improve healthcare quality and patient satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , China , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Servicios de Salud Rural/normas , Población Rural , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the impact of online small group discussions and peer role-play on medical students' attitudes toward and confidence in communication skills. METHODS: The study involved a 3-hour instructional design that integrated small group discussions and role-plays to enhance the communication abilities of fourth-year medical students. The data were obtained from students through a post-activity online survey. Likert scale responses were quantified as percentages. Students' narrative feedback on their learning achievements was subjected to content analysis. Codes and categories were agreed upon by investigators and reviewed by an external auditor. RESULTS: A total of 151 medical students responded to the survey, representing a 47.94% response rate. The majority strongly agreed that good communication skills help physicians obtain reliable information (94.00%) and that practicing questioning skills is essential (92.1%). Content analysis revealed that nearly half (48.34%) considered that the learning activities fostered positive attitudes toward communication. These attitudinal improvements included increased empathy and emotional care (37.75%), recognition of communication as a trainable skill (10.57%), and recognition of the necessity of communication skills for physicians (8.61%). Additionally, most students (75.5%) reported increased confidence in their communication skills. CONCLUSIONS: In alignment with transformative learning theory, online small group discussions combined with peer role-play may potentially enhance the attitudes and confidence of medical students in relation to communication skills.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of a serious illness communication skills training course on medical students' attitudes regarding clinical empathy, self-efficacy in empathic communication, and learning on different dimensions of empathy. METHODS: A mixed-methods design was used. A blended learning Serious Illness Communication Skills Training (SI-CST) course was delivered to sixth-year medical students. Students (n=185) completed questionnaires with the 20-item Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) and self-rated preparedness level for five empathic communication tasks at baseline (T1), six weeks (T2), and three-to-six months post-training (T3). Written reflections on key lessons learned were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Total JSE scores significantly improved from T1 to T2 (111.4 vs 113.9, P=.01) and from T1 to T3 (111.4 vs 113.9, P=.01). There was an increase in Standing in Patient's Shoes subscale of the JSE with an effect size of 0.56 whereas the Perspective-Taking and Compassionate Care subscales showed no significant changes. Self-rated preparedness for all five empathic communication tasks significantly improved from T1 to T2 (P ≤ .001) and from T1 to T3 (P ≤ .001) with large effect sizes (1.09-1.41). Four key themes emerged from the qualitative analysis. They were appreciating the important role of empathy in clinical care (moral empathy), learning skills in detecting and understanding patient emotions (cognitive empathy), learning skills in responding to emotion with empathy (behavioral empathy), and appreciating that communication skills can be improved with continual practice and self-reflection. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that SI-CST improved medical students' empathic attitudes and self-efficacy in empathic communication. Qualitative results found learning on the cognitive, behavioral and moral dimensions of empathy.
Asunto(s)
Empatía , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Emociones , Comunicación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for assessing the communication skills of oncology physicians from a patient's point of view. METHODS: A first draft of the questionnaire was compiled based on skills reflecting good physician-patient communication identified in the literature. The questionnaire was critically revised by experts to ensure the validity of its contents. The revised questionnaire was completed by a sample of 153 cancer patients. The questionnaire was developed in German and later translated into English. RESULTS: After analysis using classical test theory and an exploratory factor analysis, four different factors could be extracted. These factors were labelled setting, patient-centeredness, empathy and consulting competencies. Unsuitable items were eliminated within the analysis. All remaining items hold an appropriate degree of selectivity, item difficulty and reliability/consistency. CONCLUSION: A novel questionnaire for evaluating communication skills of physicians was developed. It contains 36 items and is named 'Com-On Questionnaire: Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Physician's Communication Skills in Oncology'. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The questionnaire is suitable for measuring both the strengths and deficits within the physician-patient communication in oncology from the patients' perspective.
Asunto(s)
Oncólogos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Comunicación , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A clinical handover is an essential nursing practice that ensures patient safety. However, most newly graduated nurses struggle to conduct clinical handovers as they lack sufficient communication skill competence and self-efficacy in this practice. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of a blended learning programme on the communication skill competence and self-efficacy of final-year nursing students in conducting clinical handovers. METHODS: A randomised controlled design was used. A convenience sample of 96 final-year baccalaureate nursing students at a local university. Data were collected in 2020. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (n = 50) that received a blended learning programme with face-to-face training and an online module on handover practice, or a waitlist control group (n = 46) that received only face-to-face handover training during the study period and an online module immediately after the completion of data collection. The primary outcome was the communication skill competence and the secondary outcome was the self-efficacy of the participants in conducting clinical handovers. An analysis of covariance was used to examine the between-subjects effects on self-efficacy and communication skill competence in conducting clinical handovers after controlling for the significantly correlated variables. A paired sample t-test was used to determine the within-subjects effects on self-efficacy. RESULTS: The participants in the experimental group had significantly higher communication skill competence (p < 0.001) than those in the waitlist control group. Although both groups showed a significant improvement in self-efficacy, the mean scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the waitlist control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the efficacy of a blended learning approach in improving the communication skill competence and self-efficacy of final-year nursing students in conducting clinical handovers. Nurse educators should incorporate a blended learning approach into the nursing curriculum to optimise the content of training programmes for teaching nursing students in conducting clinical handovers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered in the Registration ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT05150067 ; retrospective registration; date of registration 08/12/2021).
Asunto(s)
Bachillerato en Enfermería , Pase de Guardia , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Competencia Clínica , Comunicación , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , AutoeficaciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the work competence of general practitioners (GPs) in the community health services (CHSs) of Shanghai, China. METHODS: A questionnaire was designed based on a previous capacity evaluation indicator system. We used a stratified and proportional cluster sampling method in this self-assessment and cross-sectional study. We collected data with the questionnaire on GPs' demographic variables and work competence including patient care ability, teaching ability, communication skill and coordination ability. Univariate analyses were performed by Mann-Whitney U test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Multivariate analyses were done with generalized liner model with significant univariate factors. RESULTS: A total of 2954 GPs were sampled from 116 CHSs in Shanghai. The response rate was 99.9%. The median scores of patient care ability, teaching ability, communication skill and coordination ability were 80[70-88.75], 76[60-80] and 80[70-85] on a scale of 100, respectively. GPs who were 30-39 years old, or worked in urban CHSs, or took GP trainer's training or had teaching experience got higher scores in patient care ability. GPs who worked for 5-19 years in CHSs, or worked in CHSs with GP training program or took GP trainer's training had higher scores in teaching ability. For communication skill and coordination ability, GPs who worked in CHSs with GP standardized training program, or took GP trainer's training or had teaching experience in CHSs got higher scores. CONCLUSIONS: The work competence of GPs in CHSs of Shanghai could mainly cover daily work, but still needed more improvement in teaching ability.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Adulto , China , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Estudios Transversales , Médicos Generales/educación , Humanos , Autoevaluación (Psicología)RESUMEN
[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the influence of the evidence practice gap on physiotherapist and occupational therapists through shared decision making using the clinical practice guidelines. [Participants and Methods] A randomized controlled trial was used. The participants included 126 therapists from three institutions. The inclusion criteria was permanent employment in these institutions. Participants' characteristics were masked from the allocator, evaluator, and analyzer. For the intervention group, a workshop on shared decision making was conducted using clinical practice guidelines. Two control groups were set. One group received a lecture on the knowledge of clinical practice guidelines, and the other group received a lecture on the knowledge of shared decision making. The primary outcomes were "education, attitudes and beliefs, and interest and perceived role in evidence-based practice" scale. [Results] The primary outcomes showed a significant difference between the clinical practice guidelines with shared decision making group and the clinical practice guidelines group (mean ± standard deviation, pre/post; clinical practice guidelines with shared decision making group, 2.4 ± 0.9/4.4 ± 1.7; clinical practice guidelines group, 3.0 ± 1.5/3.5 ± 2.0; shared decision making group, 2.6 ± 1.2/ 3.3 ± 1.8). [Conclusion] Shared decision making education using the clinical practice guidelines improves evidence-based practice of self-efficacy in physiotherapists and occupational therapists.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to explore the specific information and communication needs of men affected by prostate cancer to inform the development of educational materials for clinicians. METHODS: This is a qualitative descriptive study. A purposive sampling strategy was used to identify men at different cancer stages and with experience of different treatment regimens. Semistructured interviews (25) were conducted with 19 men and six carers over the phone. Interview data were analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: gaps in the information provided by secondary care doctors and nurses, communication skills needed in effective clinical information provision, a need for individualised information and alternative information sources used to meet unmet needs. Regardless of cancer stage and treatment, men with prostate cancer and their carers found information regarding common and burdensome adverse effects of prostate cancer treatment particularly lacking, and their ongoing and changing information needs often overlooked. They needed information delivered in a compassionate and individually tailored manner, considering content, timing and emotional support within the context of their unique life circumstances. CONCLUSION: Clinicians often fail to recognise the need for or deliver patient-centred conversations about treatment, managing side effects and prognosis. The findings will be used to develop clinician-facing educational materials.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Comunicación , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Background and Aims: Anaesthesiologists have few opportunities to communicate with patients especially in preoperative period for various reasons. If these opportunities are not well utilized, anesthesiologists may not be able to educate patients about anaesthesia related issues. The aim of this study was to assess communication skill (CS) exhibited by the anesthesiology residents during the process of preoperative visit and informed consent. Material and Methods: This was a pre and post intervention questionnaire based study carried out in a presurgical ward of a tertiary hospital. During the process of preoperative visit and informed consent, fourteen of the second year anesthesia residents were assessed by faculty members for various aspects of CS using validated questionnaire on 3-point Likert's scale, before and after CS workshop. Residents' perception about workshop and patient satisfaction with regards to the preoperative visit and process of informed consent was assessed. Results were described in percentage value and a qualitative analysis was carried out. Results: While none of the residents exhibited 'excellent CS score' in the pre-workshop phase, six (42.86%) achieved the same after the workshop. One resident, who had 'poor CS score' moved to higher category score post workshop. The behavioural traits of professionalism, empathy, risk explanation and written consent showed statistically significant improvements post intervention by Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, with P value < 0.05. All residents felt that good communication can improve patient satisfaction and CS training should be part of the post graduate curriculum. Conclusion: Conduct of CS workshop for anesthesia residents improved certain behavioral traits during anaesthesia preoperative visit and informed consent process. This important nontechnical skill of CS, may not be uniformly acquired during clinical training and should be specifically taught and evaluated as part of post graduate curriculum.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Improving the training of physicians about communication skills and patient health literacy (HL) is a major priority that remains an open question. We aimed to examine the effectiveness of communication skills training for physicians on the hypertension outcomes and the health literacy skills, self-efficacy and medication adherence in patients with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP). METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial method was conducted on 240 hypertensive patients and 35 physicians presenting to healthcare clinics in the Mashhad, Iran, from 2013 to 2014. Using stratified blocking with block sizes of 4 and 6, eligible patients with uncontrolled blood pressure were randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. Physicians in the intervention group received educational training over 3 sessions of Focus -Group Discussion and 2 workshops. The control group received the routine care. The primary outcome was a reduction in systolic and diastolic BP from baseline to 6 months. The secondary outcome was promoting HL skills in hypertensive patients. Data were analyzed using the regression model and bivariate tests. RESULTS: After the physician communication training, there was a significant improvement in physicians-patient communication skills, hypertension outcomes, medication adherence, and self-efficacy among the patients being managed by the physicians receiving training, compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The educational intervention leads to better BP control; it may have been sufficient training of physicians change to impact counseling, HL and self-efficacy and adherence. The quality of physician-patient communication is an important modifiable element of medical communication that may influences health outcomes in hypertensive Iranian patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT), IRCT20160710028863N24. Registered April 4, 2018 [retrospectively registered].
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Alfabetización en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Capacitación en Servicio , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Médicos/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Irán , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoeficacia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Construct: The Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) is a 14-item instrument developed in English to assess medical trainees' interpersonal communication skills from the patient's perspective in clinical settings. Background: Using validated instruments and simulated patients constitutes good practice in assessing doctor-patient communication. The CAT was designed for use in real practice, but has not yet been applied to assessing OB-GYN residents' delivery of bad news in Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) stations. This study aims to provide validity evidence for using the CAT to assess residents' interpersonal communication skills under difficult circumstances in a simulated clinical setting in Brazil. Approach: Cross-cultural adaptation comprised translation into Portuguese, synthesis of translations, and back-translation. Next, a committee of 10 external and independent experts rated the items for linguistic equivalence and relevance to the overall scale. Researchers used the expert ratings to produce a preliminary Brazilian-Portuguese version. This version was applied by four simulated patients to assess 28 OB-GYN residents completing two, 10-minute OSCE stations focused on delivering bad news. Item and scale content validity indices and internal-consistency reliability were calculated. Simulated patients were interviewed to clarify any doubt regarding the content and usability of the tool and their response process. Findings: Thirteen of the 14 items in the Brazilian-Portuguese version were considered "equivalent" by at least 70% of the experts. All items were considered relevant by 100% of the experts. The Item Content Validity Index ranged from .9 to 1, and the Scale Content Validity Index was .99. The instrument showed good reliability for both scenarios (Cronbach's alpha > .90). Simulated patients considered the CAT easy to understand and complete. Conclusions: This study provides validity evidence for using the Brazilian-Portuguese CAT in a simulated clinical environment to assess OB-GYN residents' delivery of bad news. Based on this study's findings, the OB-GYN Department organized an annual formative assessment for residents to improve their interpersonal communication skills. This version of the CAT may also be applicable to other specialties.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Simulación de Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto , Brasil , Comparación Transcultural , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , TraduccionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Communication skill is a core competency in neurology residency training. Specific training in this area at the residency level is often lacking, especially regarding difficult conversations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the current state in teaching residents about difficult conversations in 5 Chinese accredited neurology residency training programs and determine whether there is a perceived need for a formalized curriculum in this field. METHODS: An anonymous, 27-question, cross-sectional online survey addressing difficult conversations for neurological residents were distributed to five grade-A, class-3 hospitals selected from the affiliated teaching hospitals of medical schools qualified to provide neurology residency training in China. RESULTS: A total of 182 residents responded to the survey, and the response rate was 67.16% (182/271). Of the participants, 84.6% were female and the average age was 26.8 years. The majority of respondent residents (n = 168; 92.31%) reported being exposed to at least one difficult conversation in their medical careers. Only 43 (23.63%) participants reported having previously received formal communication skills training. In comparison with residents without previous training, those with previous training indicated significantly more confidence (P = 0.003) and were under lower pressure (P = 0.037) in managing difficult conversations. Only 97 (53.3%) residents indicated interest in receiving formal training. Time, lack of enthusiasm, lack of educational materials and faculty expertise were commonly cited barriers to formalized training. CONCLUSION: This survey provides a preliminary assessment of the current status of education on the topic of difficult conversations in five accredited Chinese neurology residency training programs. Our results suggest that there is an unmet need to further develop and implement educational activities by teaching residents to lead difficult conversations. Future efforts should be made to establish and promote a standard and targeted communication curriculum in difficult conversation for Chinese neurological residents.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Neurología , Adulto , China , Comunicación , Estudios Transversales , Curriculum , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many foreign students have difficulty taking histories from Chinese patients, especially in clinical context of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The efficacy of using standardized patients to prepare foreign students for communicating with Chinese patients and taking their histories was evaluated in this study. METHODS: Ninety-four four-year foreign students were assigned to one of three clinical sub-departments (gynaecology, obstetrics, and reproductive endocrinology) to practice history-taking; after practicing in one sub-department, the students were then crossed over to a different department. The histories were taken from real patients in the sub-departments of obstetrics and reproductive endocrinology and from standardized patients in the sub-department of gynaecology. Prior to contact with real patients in the sub-department of reproductive endocrinology, the students practised with standardized patients. The quality levels of the case reports generated in the three departments were compared by repeated measures ANOVA. The attitudes, satisfaction and suggestions of the students were also investigated through a questionnaire. RESULTS: The local Chinese language spoken by the patients was thought to be the most common difficulty students (76.7%) encountered while taking patient histories. Two-thirds and one-third of the students were interested in taking histories from standardized and real patients, respectively. Most students (94.2%) thought that working with standardized patients was useful for practising communication skills with Chinese patients. The total scores of the case reports were significantly different among the three groups (P < 0.001), and compared with case reports collected from real patients, case reports collected from standardized patients were of better quality. However, the quality of the case reports taken from real patients was better when the case reports were generated by students who had previous practice with standardized patients than when they were generated by students lacking such experience (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Standardized patient training for practising history-taking can be included as part of the clinical training curriculum for foreign medical undergraduates in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in China.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/normas , Médicos Graduados Extranjeros , Ginecología/educación , Anamnesis/normas , Obstetricia/educación , China , Comunicación , Barreras de Comunicación , Médicos Graduados Extranjeros/psicología , Médicos Graduados Extranjeros/normas , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Effective communication in the nursing profession is not just a personal skill but is accepted as a learned and gained technique in the instructional process. It is possible for nurses to professionally provide effective and quality service with the establishment, development, and transfer to emotion of effective communication with people. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between levels of alexithymia and communication skills of nursing students. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among students attending the School of Nursing in a university in Turkey in the 2017-2018 Spring semester. A total of 634 nursing students participated in the study. The data in the study were collected with the "Student Introduction Form", the "Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS)" and the "Communication Skills Scale (CSS)". Means, standard deviations, t-test, ANOVA and Pearson correlation analysis were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The mean TAS scores of the nursing students were found to be 56.31±8.82, and the students had "moderate alexithymia" based on the average scores of the scale. The mean CSS scores of the nursing students in the study was found to be 91.16±12.99, and the students had "Good level of communication" based on the average scores of the scale. In our study, a negative and moderate correlation between the levels of alexithymia of nursing students and their communication skills was detected (p: 0.001). CONCLUSION: It was found that as the levels of alexithymia of nursing student increased, their communication skills decreased.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Utilization of Antenatal Care (ANC) is very low in Nigeria. Self-reported patient satisfaction may be useful to identify provider- and facility-specific factors that can be improved to increase ANC satisfaction and utilization. METHODS: Exit interview data collected from ANC users and facility assessment survey data from 534 systematically selected facilities in four northern Nigerian states were used. Associations between patient satisfaction (satisfied, not-satisfied) and patient ratings of the provider's interactions, care processes, out-of-pocket costs, and quality of facility infrastructure were studied. RESULTS: Of 1336 mothers, 90% were satisfied with ANC. Patient satisfaction was positively associated with responsive service (prompt, unrushed service, convenient clinic hours and privacy during consultation, AOR 2.42, 95% CI 2.05-2.87), treatment-facilitation (medical care-related provider communication and ease of receiving medicines, AOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.46-2.80), equipment availability (AOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.21), staff empathy (AOR 1.82, 95% CI 1.03-3.23), non-discriminatory treatment regardless of patient's socioeconomic status (AOR: 1.87, 95% CI 1.09-3.22), provider assurance (courtesy and patient's confidence in provider's competence, AOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.26-1.75), and number of clinical examinations received (AOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.50). ANC satisfaction was negatively impacted by out-of-pocket payment for care (vs. free care, AOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: ANC satisfaction in Nigeria may be enhanced by improving responsiveness to clients, clinical care quality, ensuring equipment availability, optimizing easy access to medicines, and expanding free ANC services.
Asunto(s)
Madres/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal , Adulto , Comunicación , Estudios Transversales , Equipos y Suministros/provisión & distribución , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Nigeria , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/provisión & distribución , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/economía , Atención Prenatal/organización & administración , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The neural mechanism of leader emergence is not well understood. This study investigated (i) whether interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) plays an important role in leader emergence, and (ii) whether INS and leader emergence are associated with the frequency or the quality of communications. Eleven three-member groups were asked to perform a leaderless group discussion (LGD) task, and their brain activities were recorded via functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)-based hyperscanning. Video recordings of the discussions were coded for leadership and communication. Results showed that the INS for the leader-follower (LF) pairs was higher than that for the follower-follower (FF) pairs in the left temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), an area important for social mentalizing. Although communication frequency was higher for the LF pairs than for the FF pairs, the frequency of leader-initiated and follower-initiated communication did not differ significantly. Moreover, INS for the LF pairs was significantly higher during leader-initiated communication than during follower-initiated communications. In addition, INS for the LF pairs during leader-initiated communication was significantly correlated with the leaders' communication skills and competence, but not their communication frequency. Finally, leadership could be successfully predicted based on INS as well as communication frequency early during the LGD (before half a minute into the task). In sum, this study found that leader emergence was characterized by high-level neural synchronization between the leader and followers and that the quality, rather than the frequency, of communications was associated with synchronization. These results suggest that leaders emerge because they are able to say the right things at the right time.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Relaciones Interpersonales , Liderazgo , Neuronas/fisiología , Neurociencias/métodos , Adulto , Algoritmos , Mapeo Encefálico/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Distribución Aleatoria , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Each year, 16,000 children suffer cardiopulmonary arrest, and in one urban study, 2% of pediatric EMS calls were attributed to pediatric arrests. This indicates a need for enhanced educational options for prehospital providers that address how to communicate to families in these difficult situations. In response, our team developed a cellular phone digital application (app) designed to assist EMS providers in self-debriefing these events, thereby improving their communication skills. The goal of this study was to pilot the app using a simulation-based investigative methodology. METHODS: Video and didactic app content was generated using themes developed from a series of EMS focus groups and evaluated using volunteer EMS providers assessed during two identical nonaccidental trauma simulations. Intervention groups interacted with the app as a team between assessments, and control groups debriefed during that period as they normally would. Communication performance and gap analyses were measured using the Gap-Kalamazoo Consensus Statement Assessment Form. RESULTS: A total of 148 subjects divided into 38 subject groups (18 intervention groups and 20 control groups) were assessed. Comparison of initial intervention group and control group scores showed no statistically significant difference in performance (2.9/5 vs. 3.0/5; p = 0.33). Comparisons made during the second assessment revealed a statistically significant improvement in the intervention group scores, with a moderate to large effect size (3.1/5 control vs. 4.0/5 intervention; p < 0.001, r = 0.69, absolute value). Gap analysis data showed a similar pattern, with gaps of -0.6 and -0.5 (values suggesting team self-over-appraisal of communication abilities) present in both control and intervention groups (p = 0.515) at the initial assessment. This gap persisted in the control group at the time of the second assessment (-0.8), but was significantly reduced (0.04) in the intervention group (p = 0.013, r = 0.41, absolute value). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that an EMS-centric app containing guiding information regarding compassionate communication skills can be effectively used by EMS providers to self-debrief after difficult events in the absence of a live facilitator, significantly altering their near-term communication patterns. Gap analysis data further imply that engaging with the app in a group context positively impacts the accuracy of each team's self-perception.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Auxiliares de Urgencia/educación , Paro Cardíaco , Aplicaciones Móviles , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Heridas y Lesiones , Niño , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Auxiliares de Urgencia/psicología , Empatía , Paro Cardíaco/psicología , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Heridas y Lesiones/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clear directions and explanations from nurses related to health behaviors and discharge procedures have been shown to effectively reduce the risk of patient readmission. Nurses thus need to develop good communication skills in order to ensure that their communications help patients become better-informed and less anxious about discharge procedures. PURPOSE: This research evaluates the communication skills of nurses following two different education interventions. METHODS: Experimental design principles for education interventions were followed in this research. Medical nurses certified at the N to N2 level in a municipal hospital in Taipei City were enrolled as participants (N=78) and divided into an experimental group and control group using stratified purposive randomization. The experimental group received clinical scenario-based simulation education for communication. The control group received standard class-based education for communication. Both groups received a pre-test evaluation and an OSCE post-test evaluation. Results were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 software. RESULTS: Independent t-test results revealed significant increases in communication skills (t=3.406, p<.05) in both groups, with the increase in the experimental group (M=5.00, SD=0.82) significantly greater than the increase in the control group (M=4.11, SD=1.41). However, the mean scores from the post-test standardized patient survey found no significant differences between the two groups in terms of communication skills. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the clinical scenario-based simulation education intervention is more effective than traditional class-based education in enhancing the communication skills of nurses.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Comunicación , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Alta del Paciente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio , Masculino , Simulación de PacienteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Proper physician-patient communication has shown to impact patients' satisfaction, and better health outcomes. On the contrary, negative impacts of poor communication have been attributed as one of the causes of increasing workplace violence. It is imperative to identify the attitude of the students towards communication skill learning. The aim of the study was to find out the attitude of undergraduate students towards communication skill learning using the communication skill attitude scale. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out from October, 2022 to July 2023 among undergraduate medical and dental students. Data was collected after obtaining the ethical approval from Institutional Review Committee (IRC number 2079/80/82) using a preformed proforma and the previously validated communication skills attitude scale questionnaire. Convenience sampling was done. The demographic details, educational characteristics, opinions regarding communication learning and median of positive and negative attitude scale scores were calculated using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). RESULTS: The total median (interquartile range) positive attitudes scale (PAS) and negative attitudes scale (NAS) scores were 52.00 (48.00-87.00) and 31.00 (28.00-34.00) respectively. The first year of undergraduates had higher PAS scores 56.00 (50.00-60.00) than final year 48.50 (44.25-55.00). The students who were in favour of CS learning during the clinical years of training had a higher PAS median score, 54.00 (49.00-58.00). CONCLUSIONS: The undergraduates had overall positive attitude towards CS learning but negative attitudes were also noted, with deterioration in the scores from first to final year of undergraduation, reiterating the importance of strengthening CS learning in the curriculum early-on in the study period.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Estudiantes de Odontología , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Estudiantes de Odontología/psicología , Estudiantes de Odontología/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Nepal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Phone calls and videoconferences are the most widely used systems to interact with patients in real time. Patient care through phone calls or videoconferences is different from an in-person meeting. Interpersonal communication skills, self-confidence communication skills and empathy with the patient may be affected during phone calls or videoconferences. AIM: The objective of this study was to describe the interpersonal communication skills, self-confidence communication skills and empathy of nursing students during patient care through phone calls or videoconferences. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 170 nursing students participated from the University of Almeria. The subjects were randomly assigned to the phone call group or videoconference group. METHODS: The students contacted standardised patients through phone calls or videoconferences. Questionnaires were used to assess interpersonal communication skills with patient, empathy, and self-confidence in communication skills. Data collection was carried out between March and May 2022. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between self-confidence in communication skills with the patient and the type of consultation, nor were statistically significant differences found between the empathy of the nursing students and the type of consultation. The students who used videoconference reported higher patient interpersonal communication skills than the students who made phone calls. Finally, the participants who made videoconferences obtained a higher score in dimension therapeutic use of self than those who made phone calls. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing students have shown a high level of empathy and interpersonal communication skills with patients and a moderate level of self-confidence in communication skills, both when interacting with patients through phone calls and videoconferences. Finally, differences were found in interpersonal communication skills with patient and type of consultation. In particular, interpersonal communication skills with the patient are greater when the nursing students make a videoconference.