Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
1.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol ; 36(5): 407-416, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36592403

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Geriatric patients account for a significant proportion of the collective treated by psychiatric consultation service in hospitals. In the Emergency Department (ED), psychotropic drugs are frequently recommended, notwithstanding their extensive side-effect profiles. This study sought to investigate medication safety of geriatric patients referred to psychiatric consultation service in the ED. METHODS: Medication lists of 60 patients from the general internal medicine and trauma surgery EDs referred to psychiatric consultation service were analyzed. Utilizing PRISCUS list and Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) classification, prescriptions of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were assessed. RESULTS: 84 drugs were newly prescribed following psychiatric consultations. The total number of drugs per patient was 5.4 ± 4.2 before psychiatric consultation and 6.5 ± 4.2 thereafter (p < .001). 22.6 % of the newly recommended drugs were PIMs according to the PRISCUS list, while 54.8 % were designated as therapeutic alternatives to PIMs. 54.8 % and 20.2 % of the newly recommended drugs were FORTA category C and D drugs, respectively. An average of 1.2 ± 1.7 drug-drug interactions (DDIs) existed before psychiatric consultation and 1.3 ± 1.9 DDIs thereafter (p = .08). CONCLUSION: The majority of newly recommended drugs by psychiatric consultation service in the ED were designated as suitable therapeutic alternatives to PIMs according to the PRISCUS list, but had comparatively unfavorable ratings according to the FORTA classification, demonstrating discrepancies between these two PIM classification systems. Physicians delivering psychiatric consultation services in the ED should not solely rely on one PIM classification system.


Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada , Psiquiatría , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
2.
Psychosomatics ; 59(6): 531-538, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30104020

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric catatonia is believed to be a rare condition, but challenges in recognition and variability in presentation may lead to underdiagnosis. Early identification and effective treatment of pediatric catatonia is critical given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with the condition. Given the widespread shortage of child and adolescent psychiatrists, at times consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrists without child training may be the frontline specialty providers asked to guide treatment of these pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on pediatric catatonia using clinical cases to illustrate unique aspects of its presentation, evaluation, and management. METHODS: We describe the presentation and management of 6 adolescents with catatonia on an inpatient pediatric service at a general hospital and use these cases as a focal point for a review of the literature. CONCLUSION: Pediatric catatonia is a potentially lethal disease entity that can be effectively treated if accurately identified early in its course. Psychiatrists working in a C-L setting may encounter this syndrome and should be aware of its presentation, evaluation, and management.


Asunto(s)
Catatonia/diagnóstico , Catatonia/terapia , Terapia Electroconvulsiva/métodos , Moduladores del GABA/uso terapéutico , Lorazepam/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Catatonia/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
3.
J Korean Med Sci ; 33(3): e18, 2018 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29215805

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inpatient suicide is one of the major issues related with hospital patient safety. Although there are many studies addressing suicide in the psychiatric unit, little is known about suicide in a medical setting. This study included the development and validation of a screening tool for the assessment of suicide risk, specialized for medical inpatients. METHODS: The preliminary questionnaire was based on review of previous suicide ideation scales, mood scales, and clinical experiences of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in Korea. Initially, the questionnaire consisted of 12 questions. One hundred adult medical inpatients were asked to perform the questionnaire. Explorative factor analysis was used to examine construct validity. Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparison with the Korean versions of the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI), the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Five questions were removed from the preliminary questionnaire by explorative factor analysis and seven questions remained to comprise the Suicide Risk Scale for Medical inpatients (SRSM). Explorative factor analysis showed that the SRSM is composed of a single factor. SRSM was highly reliable in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.91). Concurrent validity with the BSI, BHS, and HADS was statistically significant. The proposed cut-off score of the SRSM was five. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the SRSM is a valid and reliable measure for screening suicide risks in medical inpatients.


Asunto(s)
Desarrollo de Programa , Suicidio/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Derivación y Consulta , República de Corea , Riesgo , Ideación Suicida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Prevención del Suicidio
4.
Psychosomatics ; 58(4): 375-385, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28449827

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The vision and mission statements of the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine (APM) indicate that the APM should promote excellence in clinical care for patients with comorbid psychiatric and general medical conditions by seeking to influence research, public policy, and interdisciplinary education. OBJECTIVE: As the APM owns the journal, Psychosomatics, we sought to assess whether the APM's journal was fulfilling the vision and mission of its parent organization by reviewing the content of articles published in the journal to determine whether it sufficiently addresses the various clinical care knowledge areas it seeks to influence. METHODS: We categorized content in all review articles, case reports, and original research articles published in Psychosomatics in 2015 and 2016. Each article was assigned to as many categories that it covered. RESULTS: In the 163 articles reviewed, the most frequently covered fund of knowledge area was psychiatric morbidity in medical populations (44.2%); among psychiatric disorders, mood disorders (22.1%), psychiatric disorders due to a general medical condition or toxic substance (21.5%), anxiety disorders (14.7%), and delirium (13.5) were the most frequently covered. Of the medical and surgical topics, neurology (19.6%), coping with chronic illness/psychological response to illness (17.8%), toxicology (11.7%), outpatient medicine (10.4%), and cardiology (9.8%) appeared most often. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosomatics appears to be successfully providing content relevant to the APM's vision and mission statements and to practitioners of psychosomatic medicine.


Asunto(s)
Academias e Institutos , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Medicina Psicosomática , Humanos , Objetivos Organizacionales
5.
Psychosomatics ; 58(3): 252-265, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28196622

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with chest pain to general practice or emergency providers represent a unique challenge, as the differential is broad and varies widely in acuity. Importantly, most cases of chest pain in both acute and general practice settings are ultimately found to be non-cardiac in origin, and a substantial proportion of patients experiencing non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) suffer significant disability. In light of emerging evidence that mental health providers can serve a key role in the care of patients with NCCP, knowledge of the differential diagnosis, psychiatric co-morbidities, and therapeutic techniques for NCCP would be of great use to both consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrists and other mental health providers. METHODS: We reviewed prior published work on (1) the appropriate medical workup of the acute presentation of chest pain, (2) the relevant medical and psychiatric differential diagnosis for chest pain determined to be non-cardiac in origin, (3) the management of related conditions in psychosomatic medicine, and (4) management strategies for patients with NCCP. RESULTS: We identified key differential diagnostic and therapeutic considerations for psychosomatic medicine providers in 3 different clinical contexts: acute care in the emergency department, inpatient C-L psychiatry, and outpatient C-L psychiatry. We also identified several gaps in the literature surrounding the short-term and long-term management of NCCP in patients with psychiatric etiologies or co-morbid psychiatric conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Though some approaches to the care of patients with NCCP have been developed, more work is needed to determine the most effective management techniques for this unique and high-morbidity population.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Derivación y Consulta , Trastornos de Ansiedad/complicaciones , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Dolor en el Pecho/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/complicaciones , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Trastorno de Pánico/complicaciones , Trastorno de Pánico/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/complicaciones , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico
6.
Psychosomatics ; 58(5): 483-489, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28596046

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial and ethical variables influence physicians in requesting decision-making capacity (DMC) evaluations. Previous authors have classified certain DMC evaluation requests as "unwarranted" when there is no explicit suspicion or evidence that the patient might lack DMC. OBJECTIVE: To explore psychosocial and ethical reasons motivating both "warranted" and "unwarranted" DMC evaluation requests by physicians in the medical setting. METHODS: A retrospective electronic health record review was approved by the institutional review board. All psychiatric consultation requests identified as DMC evaluation requests between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012 were assessed independently by 2 reviewers. Each reviewer identified each DMC evaluation request as "warranted" vs "unwarranted." Unwarranted DMC evaluation requests were defined as those lacking explicit suspicion that the patient might lack DMC or those with explicit evidence of a patient with blatantly impaired DMC. We hypothesized that most (over half) DMC evaluation requests would be deemed unwarranted. Descriptive statistics, chi-square/Fisher exact tests, and t-test/ANOVA were used. RESULTS: A total of 146 DMC evaluations were reviewed, and 83 (56.8%) of these were deemed unwarranted. Of these, most were likely driven by a previous neuropsychiatric disturbance (p < 0.001). Various other psychosocial and ethical patterns were identified (i.e., the practice of defensive medicine and guardianship concerns). CONCLUSION: Over half of DMC evaluation requests in a general medical setting were unwarranted. Many such requests were motivated by unarticulated psychosocial and ethical factors. DMC evaluation requests appear to serve as a means for indirectly resolving various psychosocial and ethical dilemmas beyond assessing DMC itself. Implications and future directions are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Consentimiento Informado/ética , Consentimiento Informado/psicología , Competencia Mental/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Psychosomatics ; 58(3): 299-306, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28365002

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric acute agitation and behavioral escalation (PAABE) is common and disruptive to pediatric inpatient health care. There is a paucity of literature on PAABE in noncritical care inpatient pediatric care settings with little consensus on its evaluation and management. METHODS: In January 2016, a 34-question survey was e-mailed to pediatric hospitalists and consultation-liaison psychiatrists through their respective professional listservs. Excluded responses included incomplete surveys, and surveys from providers in community care settings. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions, rating scales, and free-text responses relating to the identification, education, and evaluation and management of PAABE at the respondent's respective hospital. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 38 North American academic children's hospitals. Of the respondents, 69.3% were pediatric hospitalists and 30.7% were pediatric psychiatry consultants. Most respondents practice in urban areas (84.2%), and in hospitals with ≥100 beds (89.4%). Overall, 84.2% of the respondents encountered PAABE at least once a month and as frequently as every week. Most respondents (70.0%) rated PAABE as an 8 or higher on a 10-point Likert scale. Despite being highly important and common, 53.9% of respondents do not screen for risk factors for PAABE, 63.6% reported no formal process to facilitate caregiver involvement in managing PAABE, and 59.7% indicated no physician training in PAABE evaluation and management. CONCLUSION: Many pediatric hospitals identify PAABE as a great concern, yet there is little training, screening, or standardization of care in PAABE. There is a need to consolidate existing knowledge regarding PAABE, while developing enhanced collaboration, training, and standardized practice in inpatient PAABE.


Asunto(s)
Niño Hospitalizado/psicología , Problema de Conducta/psicología , Agitación Psicomotora/diagnóstico , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Niño Hospitalizado/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Agitación Psicomotora/epidemiología , Agitación Psicomotora/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
BMC Psychiatry ; 17(1): 8, 2017 01 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28068983

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric comorbidities are common in somatically ill patients. There is a lack of data that can provide clear insights into substantial comparative advantages of different Consultation/Liaison Psychiatry (CLP) services. METHODS: The Consultation versus Liaison Psychiatry-Study collected and analyzed data of 890 primarily somatically ill hospital inpatients presenting with psychiatric symptoms in a prospective observational study design. One group was treated via a liaison-model (LM) with regular consultation hours, the other via an on-demand-model (ODM) with individually requested consultations. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-five LM and 345 ODM patients were compared. Patients in the LM were, on average, older compared to the patients of the ODM. The vast majority (90.8%) of individuals for whom a psychiatric consultation was requested came from internal medicine. The most common diagnoses were affective disorders (39.3%), organic mental disorders (18.9%), alcohol-induced mental disorders (11.3%) and reactions to severe stress/adjustment disorders (10.4%). Organic mental disorders were significantly more common in patients seen in the LM (24.0% vs. 10.3%, p < 0.001) while affective disorders were more frequently diagnosed in the ODM (46.6% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.001). Patients seen in the ODM were, on average, more severely affected compared to patients seen in the LM and required more extensive treatment. 16.3% of ODM patients were regarded as potentially suicidal; among these, 3.5% were acutely suicidal and 12.8% latently suicidal. Any form of further treatment was required by 93.0% of ODM patients compared to 77.8% in the LM. Pharmacological treatment with benzodiazepines, usually used as short-term treatment, was more frequently prescribed to patients seen in the ODM while patients seen in the LM were more often started on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, indicative of long-term treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in need of less acute treatment were considerably less common in the ODM. The data indicate a possible risk of such patients to remain unrecognized. A quasi-liaison model is recommended to be the best suitable and cost-effective way of providing psychiatric care to somatically ill patients with psychiatric comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental , Psiquiatría/métodos , Derivación y Consulta , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
9.
Acad Psychiatry ; 41(1): 16-19, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27283018

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although psychiatry residents are expected to achieve competency in conducting psychotherapy during their training, it is unclear how psychotherapy teaching is integrated across diverse clinical settings. METHODS: Between January and March 2015, 177 psychiatry residency training directors were sent a survey asking about psychotherapy training practices in their programs, as well as perceived barriers to psychotherapy teaching. RESULTS: Eighty-two training directors (44%) completed the survey. While 95% indicated that psychotherapy was a formal learning objective for outpatient clinic rotations, fifty percent or fewer noted psychotherapy was a learning objective in other settings. Most program directors would like to see psychotherapy training included (particularly supportive psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy) on inpatient (82%) and consultation-liaison settings (57%). The most common barriers identified to teaching psychotherapy in these settings were time and perceived inadequate staff training and interest. CONCLUSIONS: Non-outpatient rotations appear to be an underutilized setting for psychotherapy teaching.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Psiquiatría/educación , Psicoterapia/educación , Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Ejecutivos Médicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
Int J Psychiatry Med ; 51(3): 284-301, 2016 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27284121

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic, management, and treatment recommendations made by consultation-liaison psychiatrists (CLP) and neurologists (CLN) for suspected delirium and to investigate factors that may have influenced the choice for a particular consultation service. METHOD: In this retrospective case analysis, we screened the files of 1882 (CLP: 1112, CLN: 770) inpatients seen by CLP and CLN at the Charité - University Medicine, Berlin, Germany, in 2013. This revealed a total of 148 (CLP: 99, CLN: 49) delirium patients. Information found on the consultation form and in the patients' files was used for data collection and subsequently analyzed. RESULTS: Intensive care and surgical units preferably called CLP, while internists consulted more CLN and patients suffering from neurological or psychiatric preconditions were more often seen by the respective specialist. Despite no significant difference between psychomotor activity levels among the groups, CLP recommended significantly more pharmacological interventions (p = 0.000) and CLN ordered significantly more diagnostic procedures (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Our results show considerable differences between CLP and CLN treatment recommendations, which may indicate a conflicting approach to delirium work-up, not accountable to unequal patient characteristics. These preliminary results are not conclusive and should be followed up by high evidence level research.


Asunto(s)
Delirio/diagnóstico , Delirio/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Delirio/psicología , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/psicología , Neurólogos , Psiquiatría , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Int J Psychiatry Med ; 51(5): 395-413, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28629285

RESUMEN

Objective Psychosomatic medicine psychiatrists are often tasked with the evaluation and treatment of complex neuropsychiatric states which may be motoric in phenotype. Little energy has been dedicated to understanding acute movement disorders in the hospital environment. Method Recognizing the importance of frontal-subcortical (corticostriatothalamocortical) circuitry and basal ganglia structures, we present a case series of acute movement disorder phenotypes resulting from underlying medical conditions, commonly-administered medications, or the interaction of both. We organize these scenarios into neurodegenerative disorders, primary psychiatric disorders, neuroinflammation, and polypharmacy, demonstrating a clinical example of each followed by background references on a variety of clinical states and medications contributing to acute movement disorders. In addition, we offer visual illustration of implicated neurocircuitry as well as proposed neurotransmitter imbalances involving glutamate, gamma aminobutyric acid, and dopamine. Furthermore, we review the various clinical syndromes and medications involved in the development of acute movement disorders. Results Acute movement disorder's involve complex interactions between frontal-subcortical circuits and acute events. Given the complexity of interactions, psychopharmacological considerations become critical, as some treatments may alleviate acute movement disorders while others will exacerbate them. Conclusion Integrating underlying medical conditions and acutely administered (or discontinued) pharmacological agents offers an interactional, neuromedical approach to acute movement disorders that is critical to the work of psychosomatic medicine.


Asunto(s)
Ganglios Basales/fisiopatología , Lóbulo Frontal/fisiopatología , Trastornos del Movimiento/diagnóstico , Red Nerviosa/fisiopatología , Medicina Psicosomática , Humanos , Trastornos del Movimiento/fisiopatología , Fenotipo
12.
J Psychosom Res ; 177: 111584, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38181547

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore workload-related stress levels experienced by consultation liaison psychiatry (CLP) staff in England and Ireland, and factors relevant to such a burden, during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data were obtained for England and Ireland from a European survey among CLP services in general hospitals spread via CLP networks (11th June - 3rd October 2021). The heads of respective CLP services in general hospitals responded on behalf of each service, on 100 CLP hospital staff in total. DEPENDENT VARIABLE: workload-related stress levels in CLP services due to COVID-19 (0-10 point scale). INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: hospital size, CLP service size, degree of hospital involvement in COVID-19-related care, and the number of support options available to hospital staff. Spearman's rho correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: There was a significant association between the hospital's involvement in COVID-19-related care and workload-related stress levels as reported by CLP staff: r(22) = 0.41, p = 0.045, R2 = 0.17. There were no significant associations between workload-related stress levels and other variables including staff support (p = 0.74). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that perceived workload-related stress levels of CLP staff during the COVID-19 pandemic can be an indicator of COVID-19 involvement of the hospitals. Staff support seemed not to alleviate work stress in the context of the pandemic. Healthcare policies should improve working conditions for CLP hospital staff that play an essential role from a population health perspective. Rigorous measures may be needed to ensure mental healthcare provision remains tenable and sustainable in the long term.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicios de Salud Mental , Psiquiatría , Humanos , Hospitales Generales , Pandemias , Irlanda/epidemiología , Carga de Trabajo , COVID-19/epidemiología , Inglaterra , Derivación y Consulta
13.
Praxis (Bern 1994) ; 110(2): 76-84, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35105215

RESUMEN

Borderline Personality Disorder in the Somatic Hospital Setting Abstract. The Borderline Personality Disorder is a common mental illness characterized by emotional instability, interactional difficulties, an unstable sense of self and impulsive behaviour which is often self-destructive. Since these problems frequently occur in the doctor-patient relationship, patients might be regarded as "difficult" or even manipulative. This may lead to stigmatization and medical undertreatment when due to common mental and somatic comorbidities the condition requires thorough high-standard medical care. Whereas the core symptoms of BPD are well treatable by specific evidence-based psychotherapy, pharmacological interventions are less effective and should be restricted to crisis management. Through a better understanding of the disorder, proactive communication with all involved care providers and a collaborative doctor-patient relationship providing support and boundaries simultaneously the quality of medical care can be improved with long-lasting effects.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Hospitales , Humanos , Trastornos de la Personalidad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Psicoterapia
14.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 62: 93-95, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777298

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Consultation psychiatrists are often asked to assess factitious disorder (FD), yet this is challenging as confirmation depends on rarely achieved direct evidence of illness-inducing behaviors. Diagnosis is thus based on other variables, such as atypical features of the medical presentation and certain patient behaviors. This study sought to assess a cohort of patients with FD for demographic and clinical variables, but also psychological and behavioral ones unexamined in previous studies. METHODS: 49 previously-identified FD patients at a single site were reviewed retrospectively and variables collected included demographic, medical, psychiatric, social, behavioral, and treatment-related. Descriptive statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: Patients were mostly: 1) under age 40 (82%), 2) female (90%), 3) with past psychiatric (92%), family psychiatric (78%), and traumatic (69%) histories; 4) direct intravenous access (67%); and 7) some exposure to healthcare training (67%). All (100%) subjects had an identifiable family dynamic issue, including household abuse, parental divorce, parental influence/enmeshment, grief, and/or significant other conflict. Financial, emotional, or social incentives were common, and most patients (88%) exhibited at least 4 FD-related behaviors. CONCLUSION: FD represents a complex disorder of abnormal illness behaviors with predisposing developmental and perpetuating sociobehavioral variables previously unexplored. Future investigational, educational, and quality improvement directions are considered.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Fingidos/epidemiología , Trastornos Fingidos/fisiopatología , Trastornos Fingidos/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
15.
Psychodyn Psychiatry ; 47(2): 167-182, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31107168

RESUMEN

Chronic physical pain is prevalent condition and has gained considerable attention in the wake of the opioid crisis and epidemic. As a medical phenomenon, it has highlighted significant gaps in healthcare training, finances, clinical service, and administration. The psychodynamic determinants of pain symptoms or the need for analgesia are rarely considered in the medical management of this problem. The specific objective of this article is to offer a general psychodynamic understanding of chronic physical pain. As a psychodynamically oriented, medically informed psychiatrist practicing in a multidisciplinary pain management program, I propose a clinical construct of psychologically rich "parallel pains" to chronic physical pain, and that these pains inform important interpersonal issues dubbed "dynamic dilemmas." Chronic physical pain is defined, clinical examples are provided, and general implications are considered.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/psicología , Psicoterapia Psicodinámica , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Humanos
16.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 55: 27-37, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30296675

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To define generic quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry from the perspectives of patients, professionals (physicians, nurses, and managers), and payers (health insurance companies). METHODS: Quality variables were identified by reviewing the relevant literature. A working. group consisting of patients', professionals' and payers' representatives was mandated by their respective umbrella organizations. The working group prioritized the quality variables that were identified. Core values were defined and subsequently linked to preliminary quality indicators. These were tested for feasibility in ten hospitals in a four-week period. Stakeholder consultation took place by means of two invitational conferences and two written commentary rounds. RESULTS: Forty-one quality variables were identified from the literature. After prioritization, seven core values were defined and translated to 22 preliminary indicators. Overall, the feasibility study showed high relevance scores and good implementability of the preliminary quality indicators. A final set of twenty-two quality indicators (17 structure, 3 process and 2 outcome indicators) was then established using a consensus-based approach. CONCLUSION: Consensus on a quality framework for general hospital psychiatry was built by incorporating the perspectives of relevant stakeholders. Results of the feasibility study suggest broad support and good implementability of the final quality indicators. Structural indicators were broadly defined, and process and outcome indicators are generic to facilitate quality measurement across settings. The quality indicator set can now be used to facilitate quality and outcome assessment, stimulate standardization of services, and help demonstrate (cost-) effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Generales/normas , Psiquiatría/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Adulto , Estudios de Factibilidad , Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Países Bajos , Medicina Psicosomática/normas
17.
Neurobiol Aging ; 68: 160.e9-160.e14, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29631748

RESUMEN

We aimed to identify common genetic variations associated with delirium through genome-wide association testing in a hospital biobank. We applied a published electronic health record-based definition of delirium to identify cases of delirium, and control individuals with no history of delirium, from a biobank spanning 2 Boston academic medical centers. Among 6035 individuals of northern European ancestry, including 421 with a history of delirium, we used logistic regression to examine genome-wide association. We identified one locus spanning multiple genes, including 3 interleukin-related genes, associated with p = 1.41e-8, and 5 other independent loci with p < 5e-7. Our results do not support previously reported candidate gene associations in delirium. Identifying common-variant associations with delirium may provide insight into the mechanisms responsible for this complex and multifactorial outcome. Using standardized claims-based phenotypes in biobanks should allow the larger scale investigations required to confirm novel loci such as the one we identify.


Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Genéticas , Delirio/genética , Sitios Genéticos/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Variación Genética/genética , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo/métodos , Interleucinas/genética , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo
18.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 51: 30-35, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29309988

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The therapeutic discharge of patients assessed as misrepresenting suicidal ideation, though in the best interests of the patient, physician, and health care system, is an inherently risk-assuming action. The rationale and conduct of the therapeutic discharge has been written on previously. Here, we propose a method of documenting the therapeutic discharge in a way that is useful and teachable. METHOD: After describing some other types of note-writing that can be needed in the care of deceptive patients, we describe an approach to each of the major sections of an initial consultation/encounter note as it applies to the therapeutic discharge. RESULTS: Each note section is handled slightly differently than ordinarily. The history of present illness follows the sequence, rather than the re-organization of the information obtained. The past medical history requires and reflects a more granular chart review than is usually warranted. The mental status exam is less cross-sectional than usual. The assessment and plan incorporates several components that reflect a reasoning process specific to the therapeutic discharge. CONCLUSION: While labor-intensive, the documentation approach advocated for and exemplified here reaffirms aspects of one's identity as a physician, ensures responsible execution of a risk-involving decision, and potentially simplifies subsequent patient encounters.


Asunto(s)
Documentación/normas , Simulación de Enfermedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Alta del Paciente/normas , Ideación Suicida , Humanos , Simulación de Enfermedad/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/terapia
19.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 46: 74-78, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28622821

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients with factitious disorder or malingering behaviors pose particular problems in acute care settings. We sought to describe a manner to effectively discharge these patients and keep further harm, iatrogenic or otherwise, from being inflicted. METHOD: Once an indication has been identified, the therapeutic discharge can be carried out in a stepwise fashion, resulting in a safe discharge. We outlined how to prepare for, and execute, the therapeutic discharge, along with preemptive consideration of complications that may arise. RESULTS: Consequences for the patient, physicians, and larger healthcare system are considered. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic discharge is a safe and effective procedure for patients with deception syndromes in acute care settings. Carrying it out is a necessary element of psychiatric residency and psychosomatic medicine fellowship training.


Asunto(s)
Decepción , Trastornos Fingidos/diagnóstico , Simulación de Enfermedad/diagnóstico , Alta del Paciente/normas , Adulto , Humanos , Medicina Psicosomática/educación , Medición de Riesgo
20.
Psychiatr Pol ; 49(5): 1101-12, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés, Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26688856

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: AIM : The aim of the research is the analysis of psychiatric consultations conducted in the multi-disciplinary hospital, establishing the cause of the consultations according to ICD-10 and the analysis of psychiatric consultations regarding their number on particular wards. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical documentation concerning given consultations in the multidisciplinary hospital in Tarnowskie Góry in the years 2002-2010 has been conducted. In the statistics studies Shapiro-Wilk test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test of independence and the others have been used. RESULTS: In the analyzed years, 3,672 consultations have been done, the mean age of the consulted patients has been 46.9 years. Taking into consideration the sex of the consulted patients, 41.99% of them were female and 58.01% were male. The main diagnoses of all consultations present as follows: F00-F09: 18.82%, F10-F19: 29.58%, F20-F29: 17.70%, F30-F39: 10.29%, F40-F48: 13.83%, F50-F59: 0.16%, F60-F69: 3.21%, F70-F79: 1.77%, F80-F89: 0%, F90-F98: 1.01%, other: 3.62%. The consultations most often have taken place on the following wards: Hospital Admitting Department (13.21%), Hospital Emergency Service (6.97%), Surgery Department (8.42%), Internal Medicine Department (6.51%), Neurology Department (4.82%). CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent causes of consultation were addictions, the next were organic and psychotic disorders, neurotic and affective disorders. Consultations most often have taken place at the Hospital Admitting Department/Hospital Emergency Service, Surgery Department, Internal Medicine Department and Neurology Department.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polonia/epidemiología , Servicio de Psiquiatría en Hospital , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda