Prevalence of work-related skin symptoms and associated factors among tertiary hospital workers exposed to cleaning agents in Southern Africa.

INTRODUCTION: Working with cleaning products is associated with occupational contact dermatitis in health workers (HWs), but information on predictors for these outcomes is limited. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the prevalence of work-related skin symptoms (WRSS) and associated factors in HWs exposed to cleaning agents in two Southern African tertiary hospitals. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 697 HWs used an interviewer-administered questionnaire and assessed for atopy using Phadiatop. RESULTS: HWs' median age was 42 years, 77.0% were female and 42.5% were atopic. The prevalence of WRSS in the last 12 months was 14.8%, 12.3% had probable contact dermatitis (PCD) and 3.2% had probable contact urticaria (PCU). Technicians (ORadj 3.91) and tasks involving cleaning and disinfection of skin wounds (ORadj 1.98) were associated with WRSS in the past year. Factors associated with PCD included sterilizing instruments, disinfecting skin before procedures and use of wound adhesives. Factors associated with PCU included specimen preparation using formalin, medical instrument sterilization tasks, and skin/wound cleaning and disinfection. Appropriate glove use when performing patients' skin/wound care was protective against WRSS. CONCLUSIONS: Tasks involving cleaning and disinfecting patients' skin and wounds were associated with WRSS in HWs, especially when performed without gloves.

Contact allergy investigations in healthcare workers with face mask-related skin disease.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of face masks has increased among healthcare workers (HCWs). Questionnaire studies have shown a high frequency of self-reported facial adverse skin reactions. Case reports have been published on face mask-induced allergic contact dermatitis and urticaria. OBJECTIVES: To describe the results of the contact allergy investigations in consecutive HCWs investigated for skin reactions to face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic and the results of the chemical investigations of face masks supplied by the hospital. METHODS: Participants were patch tested with baseline series and chemicals previously reported in face masks not included in the baseline series. Face mask(s) brought by the HCW were tested as is and/or in acetone extract. Chemical analyses were performed on nine different face masks for potential allergens. RESULTS: Fifty-eight HCWs were investigated. No contact allergies were found to the face mask(s) tested. Eczema was the most common type of skin reaction, followed by an acneiform reaction. Colophonium-related substances were found in one respirator and 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) were found in two respirators. CONCLUSION: Based on this report, contact allergies to face masks is uncommon. Patch test with colophonium-related substances and BHT should be considered when investigating adverse skin reactions to face masks.

Oral food challenge in children with contact urticaria in reaction to cow's milk.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the occurrence of contact urticaria in reaction to cow's milk in infants and the diagnosis of cow's milk allergy (CMA) established by supervised oral food challenge. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we identified 184 children who had undergone 221 oral food challenge (OFC) at a CMA reference center between July 2015 and August 2019. Of these, 23 (12.5%) had a history of contact urticaria to cow's milk and underwent a total of 30 OFC. Baked cow's milk OFC were excluded, and 21 children were included in the study. All data from clinical history and allergy tests (serum-specific IgE dosages and skin prick test [SPT] with reconstituted cow's milk formula) were recorded on standardized forms. The challenge was conducted with reconstituted cow's milk formula in increasing volumes every 15-20 min. RESULTS: 24 OFC were performed; 13/24 (54.2%) for diagnostic purpose and 11/24 (45.8%) to evaluate cow's milk tolerance. Allergy tests were positive in 14 patients (87.5%). Positive oral challenge outcomes were identified in 7/24. One patient had a late flare of atopic dermatitis and five children presented with immediate urticaria (two generalized urticaria and three perioral urticaria). The median papule diameter was 6.5 mm in patients with a positive OFC and 3.75 mm in the negative group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The occurrence of contact urticaria might be the only manifestation among infants sensitized to cow's milk with tolerance to oral ingestion. Reactions due to oral challenge were related to a larger wheal diameter on the SPT.

Myricetin alleviated immunologic contact urticaria and mast cell degranulation via the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB pathway.

Immunologic contact urticaria (ICU) is characterized by the wheal and flare reaction from direct contact with a chemical or protein agent, which involves a type I hypersensitivity mediated by allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE). Myricetin (Myr), a bioactive flavonoid, exhibits antiinflammatory activities. Our results showed that treatment with Myr could alleviate ICU symptoms, including a decrease in the number of wheals and scratching, and inhibit ear swelling in the IgE/DNFB-induced mice. The serum level of IgE, histamine, interleukin (IL)-4, TNF-α, and MCP-1 were reduced in Myr-treated mice. Myr also attenuated mast cells (MCs) degranulation and H-PGDS, TSLP, IL-33, PI3K, Akt, and NF-κB mRNA levels in ICU model. The IgE-mediated anaphylaxis mouse models demonstrated anti-allergic effects of Myr. In vitro analysis showed that Myr reduced IgE-induced calcium (Ca2+ ) influx, suppressed degranulation, and chemokine release in LAD2 cells (human primary mast cells). Myr can significantly inhibited PLCγ1, Akt, NF-κB, and p38 phosphorylation. In conclusion, the study demonstrated that Myr alleviate ICU symptoms and inhibit mast cell activation via PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signal pathway.

Skin symptoms in veterinary assistant staff and veterinarians: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Veterinary assistants and veterinarians are at an increased risk of developing an occupational skin disease, for example, irritant/allergic contact dermatitis, contact urticaria and hand eczema (HE). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the prevalence of skin problems and the influence of predisposing factors especially among veterinary assistants. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among veterinary assistant staff (n = 103) and veterinarians (n = 19). A questionnaire, specific IgE determination and photographs of hands were evaluated for skin symptoms. Logistic regression models assessed predisposing factors. RESULTS: Over 50% (n = 62/122) of our study population reported hand eczema (HE) in the last 12 months (1-year prevalence). Twenty-seven subjects reported redness and contact urticaria directly after animal contact, 35 had a positive history of allergic contact dermatitis. HE was associated with (i) increased frequency of hand washing (11-15 times per day; OR 4.15, confidence interval [CI] 95% 1.18-14.6, p = 0.027, univariate model) and (ii) unprotected contact to fluids and tensides >5 times per day (OR 4.56, CI 95% 1.53-13.6, multivariate model). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high prevalence of self-reported HE among staff in veterinary practices. Excessive hand washing, unprotected contact with irritants and long-term glove use should be avoided.

Occupational contact urticaria to cannabis sativa.

Cannabis allergy is not commonly reported, perhaps due to the legal status of cannabis use and the difficulties of obtaining permission to test it. We report 3 cases of work-related cannabis allergy with features suggestive of a dermatitis, rather than a contact urticaria. Only prick tests were able to confirm the diagnosis. Identification of the cause of the rash was essential to direct work re-deployment.

Occupational dermatitis to facial personal protective equipment in health care workers: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged wear of facial protective equipment can lead to occupational dermatoses. OBJECTIVE: To identify important causes of occupational dermatoses from facial protective equipment. METHODS: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed using PubMed and Embase databases. Articles were included if they reported occupational dermatoses caused by surgical/procedure masks or N95 respirators, or both. RESULTS: We identified 344 articles, and 16 were suitable for inclusion in this review. Selected articles focused on facial occupational dermatoses in health care workers. Allergic contact dermatitis to the elastic straps, glue, and formaldehyde released from the mask fabric was reported. Irritant contact dermatitis was common on the cheeks and nasal bridge due to pressure and friction. Irritant dermatitis was associated with personal history of atopic dermatitis and prolonged mask wear (>6 hours). Acneiform eruption was reported due to prolonged wear and occlusion. Contact urticaria was rare. LIMITATIONS: Only publications listed in PubMed or Embase were included. Most publications were case reports and retrospective studies. CONCLUSION: This systematic review from members of the American Contact Dermatitis Society highlights cases of occupational dermatitis to facial protective equipment, including potential offending allergens. This work may help in the diagnosis and treatment of health care workers with facial occupational dermatitis.

Hairdressers' occupational skin diseases in the Finnish Register of Occupational Diseases in a period of 14 years.

BACKGROUND: Hairdressers have a high risk of occupational contact dermatitis caused by exposure to wet work and allergens in hairdressing chemicals. OBJECTIVES: To examine the distribution of diagnoses of occupational skin diseases (OSDs) and their main causes in hairdressers based on a national register data on occupational diseases. METHODS: We retrieved cases of recognized OSDs in hairdressers from the Finnish Register of Occupational Diseases (FROD) in years 2005-2018. RESULTS: During the 14-year period, a total of 290 cases of recognized OSD in hairdressers were registered in the FROD. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) was diagnosed in 54%, irritant contact dermatitis in 44%, and contact urticaria (CU) in 5% of them. ACD was most commonly caused by hair dye products and their ingredients (N = 57), persulfates (N = 35), and preservatives (N = 35; mainly isothiazolinones). Acrylates emerged as hairdressers' occupational contact allergens (N = 8) probably due to introduction of structure nails into hair salons. Persulfates was the most common cause of CU. CONCLUSIONS: ACD was the most common OSD in hairdressers. Our analysis confirms that preservatives are important causes of ACD in hairdressers in addition to hair dye products and persulfates. Acrylates emerged as hairdressers' occupational contact allergens, but contact allergy to perming agents remained rare.

[Exceptional occupational allergies due to food of animal origin]. / Außergewöhnliche Berufsallergien durch Nahrungsmittel tierischen Ursprungs.

BACKGROUND: The food industry is a high-risk area for work-related allergic immediate skin reactions (contact urticaria, contact urticaria syndrome, protein contact dermatitis) with or without respiratory symptoms (allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma) due to proteins of animal origin. OBJECTIVES: The present work gives an overview of allergenic seafood and meat proteins and their clinical and occupational relevance in different work settings. METHODS: A review of current knowledge and a supplementary selective literature search were performed. RESULTS: Protein contact dermatitis is one of the more common occupational dermatoses in workers exposed to seafood and meat, after irritant hand eczema. Fishermen, cooks, and butchers are most commonly affected. Crustaceans and mollusks are more frequent triggers of food allergies than fish and can in individual cases also be life threatening. In contrast, primary meat allergy is rare. Beef among mammals and chicken among birds are the most common triggers. CONCLUSIONS: All employees with allergic immediate skin and/or respiratory reactions exposed to proteins of animal origin in the workplace should undergo a careful allergological workup at an early stage. Determination of the specific IgE plays a central role in confirming the diagnosis and it is of great importance in individual cases to include the suspected native material in the skin tests. The course of the disease is generally characterized by a poor prognosis and is commonly associated with a change in occupation.

[New allergens for occupational dermatology?] / Neue Allergene für die Berufsdermatologie?

BACKGROUND: The environment is continuously subject to change. Exposures in the work environment and therefore the importance of occupational type I and type IV allergens may change. OBJECTIVES: The most important trends concerning occupational allergens, new occupational allergens/allergen exposures, the diagnostic procedure to detect new allergens in practice and regulatory developments are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Building on known relevant allergen exposures in occupational dermatology, published trends from clinical cohorts are evaluated and a systematic literature search (PubMed 2016-2021) for new occupational allergens is also performed RESULTS: Occupations with the highest incidence of occupational allergic contact urticaria and/or protein contact dermatitis include bakers, farmers and farm workers, veterinary technicians, veterinarians, cooks, dairy and livestock workers, gardeners, and hairdressers. The highest risk of developing occupational contact dermatitis is in health care, agriculture, metalworking occupations and machine operators, the food sector, service industries, and construction occupations. The search strategy "new occupational allerg*" yielded 603 hits and "novel occupational allerg*" 158 hits. A total of 25 papers included results relevant to the research question and were processed. New protein-based immediate-type allergens, as well as contact allergens (haptens) relevant for occupational dermatology, are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Current trends on known occupational allergens and new occupational allergens in the period 2016-2021 can be identified. Only a thorough individual workplace history and testing of patients' own materials can identify new allergens in occupational dermatology.

Hidden risks in toys: A systematic review of pediatric toy contact dermatitis.

Toys are a reflection of the compounds used frequently in manufacturing. Allergic contact dermatitis to potties, metal toys, and children's jewelry is well known, however, there is a broad range of skin risks in toys. With the objective to identify and publicize the associated risk of contact dermatitis in children's toys, we have searched the PubMed database from creation to September 9, 2019. Studies were eligible if they reported a new case of contact dermatitis secondary to interaction with a toy in patients from birth to 18 years of age. A toy was defined as something children interact with for entertainment during leisure time. In this review of the PubMed database we filtered by age and language which may have prevented us from detecting cases in adults that could be extrapolated to children. In addition, several articles were excluded based on title alone. A total of 1312 articles were identified and reviewed manually for inclusion criteria. Review of the articles found 25 original articles for consideration. Several toys were found to be associated with contact dermatitis. These included electronics, toy cars, costume jewelry, bicycles, sqwish balls, slime, Play-Doh, and plasticine. Electronics such as video game controllers, cellphones, iPads, and computers were implicated. In conclusion, there is still an unmet need for observation of this segment of industry for labeling of contents and ongoing surveillance.

12-year data on dermatologic cases in the Finnish Register of Occupational Diseases I: Distribution of different diagnoses and main causes of allergic contact dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Skin diseases are among the most common occupational diseases, but detailed analyses on their epidemiology, diagnoses, and causes are relatively scarce. OBJECTIVES: To analyze data on skin disease in the Finnish Register of Occupational Diseases (FROD) for (1) different diagnoses and (2) main causes of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). METHODS: We retrieved data on recognized cases with occupational skin disease (OSD) in the FROD from a 12-year-period 2005-2016 and used national official labor force data of the year 2012. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 5265 cases, of which 42% had irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), 35% ACD, 11% contact urticaria/protein contact dermatitis (CU/PCD), and 9% skin infections. The incidence rate of OSD in the total labor force was 18.8 cases/100 000 person years. Skin infections concerned mainly scabies in health care personnel. Twenty-nine per cent of the ACD cases were caused by plastics/resins-related allergens, mainly epoxy chemicals. Other important causes for ACD were rubber, preservatives, metals, acrylates, and hairdressing chemicals. Cases of occupational ACD due to isothiazolinones reached a peak in 2014. CONCLUSION: Our analysis confirms that epoxy products are gaining importance as causes of OSD and the isothiazolinone contact allergy epidemic has started to wane.

Adapting epicutaneous patch testing protocols to assess immediate-type skin reactions.

OBJECTIVE: During the development of cosmetic formulations, in vitro and in vivo methods are essential tools used to reliably assess the skin irritation potential of a product or ingredient. Epicutaneous patch testing (single and/or multiple application protocols) has long been used as an initial in vivo method to screen for possible skin irritation properties of a substance or formulation. To confirm the mildness and dermatological and/or consumer acceptance of a product, use tests are often subsequently conducted. A study was therefore initiated to see how well patch test results correlate with use tests with respect to irritation elicited by skincare (leave-on) products. METHODS/RESULTS: A number of different cosmetic formulations were assessed in both tests. Although the patch test results did not indicate substantial irritation potentials, immediate-type reactions (stinging and redness) were observed in some volunteers which disappeared within approx. 1 h. Although transient, these reactions suggested that consumer acceptance would probably be low and the studies were discontinued. Immediate-type reactions are rare but have been described for some substances used in cosmetics. These unexpected results were nevertheless intriguing and prompted the start of a journey to see if patch test protocols could be modified to assess these reactions. An occlusive short-term patch test protocol with an application period of 20 min was developed. Successful identification of the spontaneous reactions became possible. Furthermore, there was a correlation between the intensity of reactions observed in the short-term patch test and those observed in the controlled in-use studies. Short-term patch testing using the developed protocol can therefore reliably be used as a screening method, for example in the development and optimization of cosmetic formulations containing ingredients that could cause spontaneous reactions, for instance of non-immunological contact urticaria type. CONCLUSION: The lessons learned from this studies indicate that simple modifications of existing test protocols can lead to important insights into skin reactions. These modifications can then be used to create further building blocks in the development and optimization of test strategies for cosmetic formulations which offer reliable study designs for possible reactions product developers may encounter.

OBJECTIF: Lors du développement de formulations cosmétiques, les méthodes in vitro et in vivo sont des outils essentiels utilisés pour évaluer de manière fiable le potentiel d'irritation cutanée d'un produit ou d'un ingrédient. Le test épicutané (protocoles d'application uniques et / ou multiples) est utilisé depuis longtemps comme méthode initiale in vivo pour dépister les éventuelles propriétés d'irritation cutanée d'une substance ou d'une formulation. Afin de confirmer la douceur et l'acceptation dermatologique et / ou consommateur d'un produit, des tests d'usage sont souvent effectués ultérieurement. Une étude a donc été initiée pour voir dans quelle mesure les résultats des tests épicutanés correspondent aux tests d'usage en ce qui concerne l'irritation provoquée par les produits de soin (sans rinçage). MÉTHODES/RÉSULTATS: Un certain nombre de formulations cosmétiques différentes ont été évaluées dans les deux tests. Bien que les résultats du test épicutané n'indiquent pas de potentiels d'irritation substantiels, des réactions de type immédiat (picotements et rougeurs) ont été observées chez certains volontaires. Celles-ci ont disparu en à peu près 1 heure. Bien que transitoires, ces réactions de type 5 suggéraient que l'acceptation du consommateur serait probablement faible et les études ont été interrompues. Les réactions de type immédiat 6 sont rares mais ont été évoquées en relation avec certaines substances utilisées en cosmétique. Ces résultats inattendus étaient néanmoins intrigants et ont incité le lancement d'un processus pour voir si les protocoles de test épicutané pouvaient être modifiés pour évaluer ces réactions. Un protocole de test épicutané à court terme occlusif avec une période d'application de 20 min a été développé, permettant l'identification réussie des réactions spontanées. Il a été de plus constate une corrélation entre l'intensité des réactions observées dans le test épicutané à court terme et celles observées dans les test d'usage contrôlés. Le test épicutané à court terme utilisant le protocole développé peut donc être utilisé de manière fiable comme méthode de dépistage, par exemple dans le développement et l'optimisation de formulations cosmétiques contenant des ingrédients qui pourraient provoquer des réactions spontanées, par exemple de type urticaire de contact non immunologique. CONCLUSION: Les leçons tirées de ces études indiquent que de simples modifications des protocoles de test existants peuvent révéler des informations importantes sur les réactions cutanées. Ces modifications peuvent ensuite être utilisées pour créer d'autres blocs de construction dans le développement et l'optimisation de stratégies de test pour des formulations cosmétiques qui offrent des conceptions d'études fiables pour les réactions possibles que les développeurs de produits peuvent rencontrer.

Effects of RNA interference-mediated E-selectin gene silencing on cell adhesion molecule expression and cell-cell adhesion in vascular endothelial cells in mice with immunologic contact urticaria.

Contact urticaria is recognized as the wheal and flare reaction at a site from direct contact with a chemical or protein agent. Ongoing studies have proposed that gene silencing may have a promising future in finding optimal treatment of a variety of disease; hence, the aim of the study was to investigate the effect of RNA interference-mediated E-selectin ( SELE) gene silencing on cell adhesion molecule expression and on cell-cell adhesion in vascular endothelial cells (VECs) in a mouse model of immunologic contact urticaria (ICU). Following the successful establishment of mouse models of ICU induced by antidinitrophenol immunoglobulin E (IgE) combining 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene challenge, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunohistochemistry were used to measure the levels of IgE, interleukin 4 (IL-4), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and histamine as well as the positive expression rate of SELE, respectively. The siRNA- SELE vector was constructed and transfection efficiency was estimated prior to performing quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blot assay to determine the relative expression of SELE, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), L-selectin (CD62L), and the alpha chain of leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 (CD11a). Adhesion assay was then performed to assess the cell adhesion ability in VECs. Elevated levels of IgE, IL-4, IFN-γ, and histamine and increased positive expression rate of SELE were indicative of successful establishment of mouse models of ICU. Furthermore, the relative expression levels of SELE, ECP, ICAM-1, CD62L, and CD11a were highest in the OE- SELE group. Besides, cell adhesion ability of VECs was notably promoted. Collectively, the current study define the potential role of SELE silencing as an inhibitor to ICU development by inhibiting cell adhesion ability of VECs.

[Severe immediate hypersensitivity reaction with generalized contact urticaria after cutaneous application of topical permethrin]. / Réaction d'hypersensibilité immédiate sévère avec urticaire de contact généralisée secondaire à l'application cutanée de perméthrine topique.

BACKGROUND: Permethrin is a synthetic pyrethroid used as a chemical insecticide that obtained an MA in the management of human scabies in 2014. We report a case of severe immediate hypersensitivity (IH) reaction with generalized contact urticaria secondary to the cutaneous application of 5% permethrin cream (Topiscab®). OBSERVATION: A 44-year-old woman with no personal history of atopy was treated with oral ivermectin, Topiscab® and levocetirizine for suspected scabies. Eight hours after taking a levocetirizine tablet and five hours after the application of a tube of Topiscab® together with oral ivermectin, she presented generalized urticaria, nausea and diarrhoea, followed by loss of consciousness. Skin prick-tests for ivermectin and levocetirizine were negative. We noticed non-significant erythema with permethrin. The open application test with Topiscab® was strongly positive at 20min with the appearance of an urticaria plaque in the area of application. The open test with sorbic acid was positive at 2h. Accidental exposure to permethrin spray caused dyspnoea and recurrence of urticaria. DISCUSSION: Mild and transient symptoms are regularly described after cutaneous application (burning, paraesthesia or increased itching). Delayed hypersensitivity reactions such as contact dermatitis have been reported in the literature. Exceptional cases of severe IH reactions have been described following occupational exposure to airborne pyrethroid insecticides. No cases of severe IH reaction secondary to application of topical permethrin have been reported.

3-(Bromomethyl)-2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)- benzoic acid: a new cause of sensitiser induced occupational asthma, rhinitis and urticaria.

OBJECTIVES: 3-(Bromomethyl)-2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-benzoic acid (BCMBA) has not previously been identified as a respiratory sensitiser. We detected two cases who presented respiratory and urticaria symptoms related to BCMBA and had positive skin prick tests to the agent. Subsequently, we conducted outbreak investigations at the BCMBA-producing factory and performed clinical examinations to confirm occupational diseases. METHODS: The outbreak investigations included observations of work processes, assessment of exposure, a medical survey with a questionnaire and skin prick tests with 0.5% BCMBA water solution on 85 exposed workers and 9 unexposed workers. We used specific inhalation or nasal challenge and open skin application test to investigate BCMBA-related occupational asthma, rhinitis and contact urticaria. RESULTS: We identified nine workers with respiratory and/or skin symptoms and positive skin prick tests to BCMBA in a chemical factory. A survey among chemical factory workers indicated a BCMBA-related sensitisation rate of 8% among all exposed workers; the rate was highest (25%) among production workers in the production hall. Sensitisation was detected only in workers with the estimated highest exposure levels. Six cases of occupational asthma, rhinitis and/or contact urticaria caused by BCMBA were confirmed with challenge tests. Asthma-provoking doses in specific inhalation challenges were very low (0.03% or 0.3% BCMBA in lactose). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a new low molecular weight agent causing occupational asthma, rhinitis and contact urticaria. A typical clinical picture of allergic diseases and positive skin prick tests suggest underlying IgE-mediated disease mechanisms. Stringent exposure control measures are needed in order to prevent BCMBA-related diseases.