CPAK classification detect the real knee joint apex position in less than half of the knees.

PURPOSE: Accurate assessment of the knee joint line is essential for surgeries involving the knee. The knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) is a radiological measurement that evaluates the position of the knee joint relative to the ground and is frequently used in preoperative planning and clinical follow-up. On the other hand, coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classifications assesses the joint line as the summation of the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA). The purpose of this study is to determine the concordance of these two measurement techniques. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated the long-leg standing radiographs (LSRs) of 164 healthy knees. The extremity KJLO and CPAK classification JLO were measured twice by two observers at 8-week intervals. The knee joint line apex positions (proximal, neutral and distal) of the two measurement techniques are compared (concordance or discordant). The intraobserver and interobserver reliability were examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Possible causes of the discordant were evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: CPAK classification detected the KJLO apex position in 70 extremities (42.7%) only. Subgroups CPAK JLO detected 13.6% of the proximal apex, 20.4% of the neutral, and 90.7% of the distal apex (p < 0.01). Upon multivariate logistic regression analysis, the variable KJLO apex position (proximal, neutral vs. distal, odds ratio (OR) = 10.291, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.225-25.656, and (p < 0.01) was determined as a risk factor for discordant. CONCLUSION: The CPAK JLO measurement technique can be misleading in defining the KJLO apex position and the concordance between them is less than 50%. It has a high tendency to misleadingly predict proximal and neutral apex positions, which can potentially have negative implications for assessing the joint line. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Predicting valgus malalignment after mobile-bearing UKA using a new method: the arithmetic HKA of the arthritic knee.

BACKGROUND: Valgus malalignment is one of the most common reasons for the progression of osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment of the knee after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification could reflect the constitutional alignment of the arthritic knee. The purpose of this study was to observe the relationship between the aHKA and valgus malalignment after mobile-bearing UKA. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using 200 knees undergoing UKA from January 1, 2019, to August 1, 2022. These radiographic signs, including preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical proximal tibial angle (MPTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and postoperative HKA, were measured using standardized weight-bearing long-leg radiographs. Patients with postoperative HKA > 180° and postoperative HKA ≤ 180° were classified as the valgus group and non-valgus group, respectively. The aHKA was calculated as 180° + MPTA - LDFA in this study, which had the same meaning as that (aHKA = MPTA - LDFA) in the CPAK classification. The Spearman correlation analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test, the chi-square test, the Fisher's exact test, and multiple logistic regression were used in the study. RESULTS: Of the 200 knees included in our study, 28 knees were classified as the valgus group, while 172 knees were in the non-valgus group. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of aHKA (all groups) was 177.04 ± 2.58°. In the valgus group, 11 knees (39.3%) had a value of aHKA > 180°, while 17 knees (60.7%) had a value of aHKA ≤ 180°. In the non-valgus group, 12 knees (7.0%) had a value of aHKA > 180°, while 160 knees (93.0%) had a value of aHKA ≤ 180°. In Spearman correlation analysis, aHKA was positively correlated with postoperative HKA (r = 0.693, p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, preoperative HKA (p < 0.001), LDFA (p = 0.02), MPTA (p < 0.001), and aHKA (p < 0.001) showed significant differences between the valgus and non-valgus groups. Variables with p < 0.1 in univariate analysis were further analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis, and the variable-aHKA (> 180° vs ≤ 180°, odds ratio (OR) = 5.899, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.213 to 28.686, and p = 0.028) was expressed as the risk factor of postoperative valgus malalignment. CONCLUSION: The aHKA is correlated with the postoperative alignment of mobile-bearing UKA and a high aHKA (> 180°) will increase the risk of postoperative valgus malalignment. Therefore, mobile-bearing UKA should be performed with caution in patients with preoperative aHKA > 180°.