Extracorporeal Blood Purification and Organ Support in the Critically Ill Patient during COVID-19 Pandemic: Expert Review and Recommendation.

Critically ill COVID-19 patients are generally admitted to the ICU for respiratory insufficiency which can evolve into a multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome requiring extracorporeal organ support. Ongoing advances in technology and science and progress in information technology support the development of integrated multi-organ support platforms for personalized treatment according to the changing needs of the patient. Based on pathophysiological derangements observed in COVID-19 patients, a rationale emerges for sequential extracorporeal therapies designed to remove inflammatory mediators and support different organ systems. In the absence of vaccines or direct therapy for COVID-19, extracorporeal therapies could represent an option to prevent organ failure and improve survival. The enormous demand in care for COVID-19 patients requires an immediate response from the scientific community. Thus, a detailed review of the available technology is provided by experts followed by a series of recommendation based on current experience and opinions, while waiting for generation of robust evidence from trials.

Thrombogenicity and long-term cytokine removal capability of a novel asymmetric triacetate membrane hemofilter.

Hemofilters applied in continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) for the treatment of acute kidney injury must meet high standards in biocompatibility and permeability for middle and large molecules over extended treatment times. In general, cellulose-based membranes exhibit good biocompatibility and low fouling, and thus appear to be beneficial for CRRT. In this in vitro study, we compared a novel asymmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA) membrane with three synthetic membranes [polysulfone (PS), polyethersulfone (PES), and polyethylenimine-treated acrylonitrile/sodium methallyl sulfonate copolymer (AN69 ST)] regarding thrombogenicity and cytokine removal. For thrombogenicity assessment, we analyzed the thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) generation in human whole blood during 5 h recirculation and filtration. Sieving coefficients of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were determined using human plasma as test fluid. ATA and AN69 ST membrane permeability were determined also during long-term experiments (48.5 h). ATA exhibited the lowest TAT generation (6.3 µg/L at 5 h), while AN69 ST induced a pronounced concentration increase (152.1 µg/L) and filter clogging during 4 out of 5 experiments. ATA (IL-8: 1.053; IL-6: 1.079; IL-10: 0.898; TNF-α: 0.493) and PES (0.973; 0.846; 0.468; 0.303) had the highest sieving coefficients, while PS (0.697; 0.100; 0.014; 0.012) and AN69 ST (N/A; 0.717; 0; 0.063) exhibited lower permeability. Long-term experiments revealed stronger fouling of the AN69 ST compared to the ATA membrane. We observed the highest permeability for the tested cytokines, the lowest thrombogenicity, and the lowest fouling with the ATA membrane. In CRRT, these factors may lead to increased therapy efficacy and lower incidence of coagulation-associated events.

High-Dose Versus Conventional-Dose Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration and Patient and Kidney Survival and Cytokine Removal in Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Soluble inflammatory mediators are known to exacerbate sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been suggested to play a part in immunomodulation by cytokine removal. However, the effect of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) dose on inflammatory cytokine removal and its influence on patient outcomes are not yet clear. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Septic patients with AKI receiving CVVHDF for AKI. INTERVENTION: Conventional (40mL/kg/h) and high (80mL/kg/h) doses of CVVHDF for the duration of CRRT. OUTCOMES: Patient and kidney survival at 28 and 90 days, circulating cytokine levels. RESULTS: 212 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Mean age was 62.1 years, and 138 (65.1%) were men. Mean intervention durations were 5.4 and 6.2 days for the conventional- and high-dose groups, respectively. There were no differences in 28-day mortality (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.73-1.43; P=0.9) or 28-day kidney survival (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.48-1.93; P=0.9) between groups. High-dose CVVHDF, but not the conventional dose, significantly reduced interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-1b, and IL-10 levels. There were no differences in the development of electrolyte disturbances between the conventional- and high-dose groups. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. Only the predilution CVVHDF method was used and initiation criteria were not controlled. CONCLUSIONS: High CVVHDF dose did not improve patient outcomes despite its significant influence on inflammatory cytokine removal. CRRT-induced immunomodulation may not be sufficient to influence clinical end points.

A New Application for Albumin Dialysis in Extracorporeal Organ Support: Characterization of a Putative Interaction Between Human Albumin and Proinflammatory Cytokines IL-6 and TNFα.

Albumin dialysis in extracorporeal organ support is often performed in the treatment of liver failure as it facilitates the removal of toxic components from the blood. Here, we describe a possible effect of albumin dialysis on proinflammatory cytokine levels in vitro. Initially, albumin samples were incubated with different amounts of cytokines and analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Analysis of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) levels indicated that increased concentrations of albumin reduce the measureable amount of the respective cytokines. This led to the hypothesis that the used proinflammatory cytokines may interact with albumin. Size exclusion chromatography of albumin spiked with cytokines was carried out using high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. The corresponding fractions were evaluated by immunoblotting. We detected albumin and cytokines in the same fractions indicating an interaction of the small-sized cytokines IL-6 and TNFα with the larger-sized albumin. Finally, a two-compartment albumin dialysis in vitro model was used to analyze the effect of albumin on proinflammatory cytokines in the recirculation circuit during 6-h treatment. These in vitro albumin dialysis experiments indicated a significant decrease of IL-6, but not of TNFα, when albumin was added to the dialysate solution. Taken together, we were able to show a putative in vitro interaction of human albumin with the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6, but with less evidence for TNFα, and demonstrated an additional application for albumin dialysis in liver support therapy where IL-6 removal might be indicated.

Impact of intraoperative haemoadsorption on outcomes of patients undergoing aortic surgery: a single-centre, prospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of a cytokine haemoadsorption (HA) device (CytoSorb®) on inflammatory markers and patients' outcome during aortic root surgery. METHODS: Prospective, observational study including all-comers with quasi-randomization by strictly alternating inclusion (1:1 basis). Sixty patients undergoing elective aortic surgery were assigned to either HA group (n = 30) with intraoperative HA, or a control (C) group (n = 30). Primary outcomes were: (i) impact of HA on haemodynamic stability and need for vasopressors (vasoactive-inotropic score) and (ii) sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. Secondary parameters included the impact of HA on the course of hyperinflammation using interleukin-6 and procalcitonin, duration of mechanical ventilation, and lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stay. RESULTS: Noradrenaline requirement was significantly reduced in the HA group postoperatively compared to the C group (HA: 0.03 µg/kg/min vs C: 0.08 µg/kg/min, P = 0.004 at 2 h, and HA: 0.02 µg/kg/min vs C: 0.04 µg/kg/min, P = 0.004 at 24 h). This translated into a significantly lower vasoactive-inotropic score in the HA group. SOFA score was less in the HA group at all time points and reached statistical significance 2 h postoperatively (HA: 5.77 vs C: 7.43, P < 0.001). Intraoperative HA significantly reduced interleukin-6 levels (P < 0.05) at all time points, and procalcitonin at 2 h after discontinuation from cardiopulmonary bypass (P = 0.005). The duration of ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital stays were shorter in the HA group compared to the C group. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative HA has the potential to mitigate hyperinflammatory response leading to improved haemodynamics after aortic root surgery, thereby shortening the duration of ventilation, and lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stay. However, it must be evaluated in larger cohorts.

Nanobody-functionalized conduit with built-in static mixer for specific elimination of cytokines in hemoperfusion.

Removing excessively produced cytokines is of paramount significance in blood purification therapy for hypercytokinemia-associated diseases. In this study, we devised a conduit that is modified with nanobodies (Nb) and incorporates static mixers (Nb-SMC) to eliminate surplus cytokines from the bloodstream. The low-pressure-drop (LPD) static mixer, with each unit featuring two 90°-crossed blades, was strategically arranged in a tessellated pattern on the inner wall of the conduit to induce turbulent mixing effects during the flow of blood. This arrangement enhances mass transfer and molecular diffusion, thereby assisting in the identification and elimination of cytokines. By utilizing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies, the Nb-SMC was rationally designed and prepared, ensuring an optimal interval between two mixer units (H/G = 2.5). The resulting Nb-SMC exhibited a remarkable selective clearance of IL-17A, reaching up to 85 %. Additionally, the process of Nb immobilization could be adjusted to achieve the simultaneous removal of multiple cytokines from the bloodstream. Notably, our Nb-SMC displayed good blood compatibility without potential adverse effects on the composition of human blood. As the sole documented static mixer-integrated conduit capable of selectively eliminating cytokines at their physiological concentrations, it holds promise in the clinical potential for hypercytokinemia in high-risk patients. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: High-efficient cytokines removal in critical care still remains a challenge. The conduit technique we proposed here is a brand-new strategy for cytokines removal in blood purification therapy. On the one hand, nanobody endows the conduit with specific recognition of cytokine, on the other hand, the build-in static mixer enhances the diffusion of antigenic cytokine to the ligand. The combination of these two has jointly achieved the efficient and specific removal of cytokine. This innovative material is the only reported artificial biomaterial capable of selectively eliminating multiple cytokines under conditions close to clinical practice. It has the potential to improve outcomes for patients with hypercytokinemia and reduce the risk of adverse events associated with current treatment modalities.

Effects of enhanced adsorption haemofiltration versus haemoadsorption in severe, refractory septic shock with high levels of endotoxemia: the ENDoX bicentric, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Endotoxin adsorption is a promising but controversial therapy in severe, refractory septic shock and conflicting results exist on the effective capacity of available devices to reduce circulating endotoxin and inflammatory cytokine levels. METHODS: Multiarm, randomized, controlled trial in two Swiss intensive care units, with a 1:1:1 randomization of patients suffering severe, refractory septic shock with high levels of endotoxemia, defined as an endotoxin activity ≥ 0.6, a vasopressor dependency index ≥ 3, volume resuscitation of at least 30 ml/kg/24 h and at least single organ failure, to a haemoadsorption (Toraymyxin), an enhanced adsorption haemofiltration (oXiris) or a control intervention. Primary endpoint was the difference in endotoxin activity at 72-h post-intervention to baseline. In addition, inflammatory cytokine, vasopressor dependency index and SOFA-Score dynamics over the initial 72 h were assessed inter alia. RESULTS: In the 30, out of 437 screened, randomized patients (10 Standard of care, 10 oXiris, 10 Toraymyxin), endotoxin reduction at 72-h post-intervention-start did not differ among interventions (Standard of Care: 12 [1-42]%, oXiris: 21 [10-51]%, Toraymyxin: 23 [10-36]%, p = 0.82). Furthermore, no difference between groups could be observed neither for reduction of inflammatory cytokine levels (p = 0.58), nor for vasopressor weaning (p = 0.95) or reversal of organ injury (p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: In a highly endotoxemic, severe, refractory septic shock population neither the Toraymyxin adsorber nor the oXiris membrane could show a reduction in circulating endotoxin or cytokine levels over standard of care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01948778. Registered August 30, 2013. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01948778.

Impact of a VA-ECMO in Combination with an Extracorporeal Cytokine Hemadsorption System in Critically Ill Patients with Cardiogenic Shock-Design and Rationale of the ECMOsorb Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock and arrest present as critical, life-threatening emergencies characterized by severely compromised tissue perfusion and inadequate oxygen supply. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) serves as a mechanical support system for patients suffering shock refractory to conventional resuscitation. Despite the utilization of VA-ECMO, clinical deterioration due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) resulting from the underlying shock and exposure of blood cells to the artificial surfaces of the ECMO circuit may occur. To address this issue, cytokine adsorbers offer a valuable solution by eliminating blood proteins, thereby controlling SIRS and potentially improving hemodynamics. Consequently, a prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial will be carried out with ECMOsorb. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: ECMOsorb is a single-center, controlled, randomized, triple-blinded trial that will compare the hemodynamic effects of treatment with a VA-ECMO in combination with a cytokine adsorber (CytoSorb®, intervention) to treatment with VA-ECMO only (control) in patients with cardiogenic shock (with or without prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)) requiring extracorporeal, hemodynamic support. Fifty-four patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to the intervention or control group over a 36-month period. The primary endpoint of ECMOsorb is the improvement of the Inotropic Score (IS) 72 h after the intervention. Prognostic indicators, including mortality rates, hemodynamic parameters, laboratory findings, echocardiographic assessments, quality of life measurements, and clinical parameters, will serve as secondary outcome measures. The safety evaluation encompasses endpoints such as air embolisms, allergic reactions, peripheral ischemic complications, vascular complications, bleeding incidents, and stroke occurrences. CONCLUSIONS: The ECMOsorb trial seeks to assess the efficacy of a cytokine adsorber (CytoSorb®; CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany) in reducing SIRS and improving hemodynamics in patients with cardiogenic shock who are receiving VA-ECMO. We hypothesize that a reduction in cytokine levels can lead to faster weaning from inotropic and mechanical circulatory support, and ultimately to improved recovery.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cytokine removal and continuous renal replacement therapy in a severe burn adult patient.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can develop early in burn patients with inhalation injury in the presence of cytokine storm and the proinflammatory response can be a supplemental factor for ARDS aggravation. We report the case of a 41-years old male with 25% total body surface area deep partial thickness burns to upper body extremity and grade II inhalational injury who developed severe ARDS, nosocomial pneumonia, and septic shock. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with hemoadsorption were successfully used at different moments to overcome critical situations. Although debatable, the use of ECMO in burn patients with severe ARDS could be considered when conventional treatment fails. The use of CRRT combined with hemoadsorption may limit the proinflammatory response sustained by the combination between major burn, ECMO and sepsis.

Hemoadsorption as Adjuvant Therapy in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is often a consequence of a dysregulated immune response; therefore, immunomodulation by extracorporeal cytokine removal has been increasingly used as an adjuvant therapy, but convincing data are still missing. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adjunctive hemoadsorption (HA) on clinical and laboratory outcomes in patients with ARDS. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science (PROSPERO: CRD42022292176). The population was patients receiving HA therapy for ARDS. The primary outcome was the change in PaO2/FiO2 before and after HA therapy. Secondary outcomes included the before and after values for C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and norepinephrine (NE) doses. RESULTS: We included 26 publications, with 243 patients (198 undergoing HA therapy and 45 controls). There was a significant improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratio following HA therapy (MD = 68.93 [95%-CI: 28.79 to 109.06] mmHg, p = 0.005) and a reduction in CRP levels (MD = -45.02 [95%-CI: -82.64; -7.39] mg/dL, p = 0.026) and NE dose (MD = -0.24 [95%-CI: -0.44 to -0.04] µg/kg/min, p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, HA resulted in a significant improvement in oxygenation and a reduction in NE dose and CRP levels in patients treated with ARDS. Properly designed RCTs are still needed.

Extracorporeal blood purification therapies for sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: expert opinion from the SIAARTI-SIN joint commission.

Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury is a life-threatening condition leading to high morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Over the past decades, several extracorporeal blood purification therapies have been developed for both sepsis and sepsis-associated acute kidney injury management. Despite the widespread use of extracorporeal blood purification therapies in clinical practice, it is still unclear when to start this kind of treatment and how to define its efficacy. Indeed, several questions on sepsis-associated acute kidney injury and extracorporeal blood purification therapy still remain unresolved, including the indications and timing of renal replacement therapy in patients with septic vs. non-septic acute kidney injury, the optimal dialysis dose for renal replacement therapy modalities in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury patients, and the rationale for using extracorporeal blood purification therapies in septic patients without acute kidney injury. Moreover, the development of novel extracorporeal blood purification therapies, including those based on the use of adsorption devices, raised the attention of the scientific community both on the clearance of specific mediators released by microorganisms and by injured cells and potentially involved in the pathogenic mechanisms of organ dysfunction including sepsis-associated acute kidney injury, and on antibiotic removal. Based on these considerations, the joint commission of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SIAARTI) and the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN) herein addressed some of these issues, proposed some recommendations for clinical practice and developed a common framework for future clinical research in this field.

The role of continuous renal replacement therapy (Crrt) in Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) patients.

Even without the presence of the novel Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), acute kidney injury has been a serious problem in medicine for decades, with mortality rate up to 70% among those who eventually required renal replacement therapy, and the number has not changed significantly for the last 30 years despite major advances in technology and experience. On the other hand, even without acute kidney injury, COVID-19 was a major cause of death globally in the year 2020, but the occurrence of acute kidney injury among COVID-19 patients is an independent risk factor of increased mortality. Continuous renal replacement therapy has been recommended to treat acute kidney injury in COVID-19 patients instead of conventional intermittent hemodialysis. Moreover, its use might have another beneficial role in stopping the progression of severe COVID-19 by removing pro-inflammatory cytokines during cytokine storm syndrome, which is postulated as the pathophysiology behind severe and critically severe cases of COVID-19. This review will cover a brief history of continuous renal replacement therapy and its modalities, before digging up more into its use in COVID-19 patients, including the optimum filtration dose and timing, membrane filtration used, vascular access, anticoagulation therapy, and drug dosing adjustment during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Extracorporeal cytokine adsorption in septic shock: A proof of concept randomized, controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this proof of concept, prospective, randomized pilot trial was to investigate the effects of extracorporeal cytokine removal (CytoSorb®) applied as a standalone treatment in patients with septic shock. METHODS: 20 patients with early (<24 h) onset of septic shock of medical origin, on mechanical ventilation, norepinephrine>10 µg/min, procalcitonin (PCT) > 3 ng/mL without the need for renal replacement therapy were randomized into CytoSorb (n = 10) and Control groups (n = 10). CytoSorb therapy lasted for 24 h. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded at baseline (T0), T12, T24, and T48 hours. RESULTS: Overall SOFA scores did not differ between the groups. In the CytoSorb-group norepinephrine requirements and PCT concentration decreased significantly (norepinephrine: CytoSorb: T0 = 0.54[IQR:0.20-1.22], T48 = 0.16[IQR:0.07-0.48], p = .016; Controls: T0 = 0.43[IQR:0.19-0.64], T48 = 0.25[IQR:0.08-0.65] µg/kg/min; PCT: CytoSorb: T0 median = 20.6[IQR: 6.5-144.5], T48 = 5.6[1.9-54.4], p = .004; Control: T0 = 13.2[7.6-47.8], T48 = 9.2[3.8-44.2]ng/mL). Big-endothelin-1 concentrations were also significantly lower in the CytoSorb group (CytoSorb: T0 = 1.3 ±â€¯0.6, *T24 = 1.0 ±â€¯0.4, T48 = 1.4 ±â€¯0.8, *p = .003; Control: T0 = 1.1 ±â€¯0.7, T24 = 1.1 ±â€¯0.6, T48 = 1.2 ±â€¯0.6 pmol/L, p = .115). There were no CytoSorb therapy-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first trial to investigate the effects of early extracorporeal cytokine adsorption treatment in septic shock applied without renal replacement therapy. It was found to be safe with significant effects on norepinephrine requirements, PCT and Big-endothelin-1 concentrations compared to controls. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, under the registration number of NCT02288975, registered 13 November 2014.

Extracorporeal blood purification in burns: a review.

A prolonged and fulminant inflammatory state, with high levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators, is seen after extensive thermal injury. Blood purification techniques including plasma exchange, continuous venovenous hemofiltration, and adsorbing membranes have the potential to modulate this response, thereby improving outcomes. This article describes the scientific rationale behind blood purification in burns and offers a review of literature regarding its potential application in this patient cohort.

Reduction of elevated cytokine levels in acute/acute-on-chronic liver failure using super-large pore albumin dialysis treatment: an in vitro study.

The removal of small water soluble toxins and albumin-bound toxins in acute liver failure patients (ALF) or acute-on-chronic liver failure (AocLF) patients has been established using extracorporeal liver support devices (e.g. Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System; MARS). However, reduction of elevated cytokines in ALF/AocLF using MARS is still not efficient enough to lower patients' serum cytokine levels. New membranes with larger pores or higher cut-offs should be considered in extracorporeal liver support devices based on albumin dialysis in order to address these problems, as the introduction of super-large pore membranes could counterbalance high production rates of cytokines and further improve detoxification in vivo. Using an established in vitro two compartment albumin dialysis model, three novel membranes of different pore sizes were compared with the MARS Flux membrane for cytokine removal and detoxification qualities in vitro. Comparing the membranes, no improvement in the removal of water soluble toxins was found. Albumin-bound toxins were removed more efficiently using novel large (Emic2) to super-large pore sized membranes (S20; HCO Gambro). Clearance of cytokines IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α was drastically improved using super-large pore membranes. The Emic2 membrane predominantly removed IL-6. In vitro data suggest that the usage of larger pore sized membranes in albumin dialysis can efficiently reduce elevated cytokine levels and liver failure toxins. Using large to super-large pore membranes might exert effects on patients' serum cytokine levels. Combined with increased detoxification this could lead to higher survival in ALF/AocLF. Promising membranes for clinical evaluation have been identified.

Cytokine removal on extracorporeal life support for treatment of acute endotoxemia: a randomized controlled animal study.

BACKGROUND: We prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of resin adsorption incorporated in an extracorporeal life support (ELS) circuit in an animal model of sepsis for removal of cytokines and prevention of hemodynamic deterioration during the treatment of septic shock. METHODS: Twelve female landrace pigs were randomly assigned to two groups, a study group(n=6), treated with high-flow resin adsorption (300 mL/min) and ELS, and a control group (n=6), treated only with ELS. Septic shock was induced by intravenous 0.02 µg/kg/min infusion was of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Measurements were carried out in the study group at baseline, at the end of LPS injection(t0) at 30(t1), 60(t2), 90(t3) and 120 min (t4) and 60 min after stopping resin-adsorption (t5). In the control group measurements were performed at baseline (t0), t1 and only t2, as no control animal survived beyond this latter experimental timepoint. RESULTS: The final population consisted of 9 animals, five in the study group and 4 in the control group. Plasma values of both tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were reduced during resin-adsorption (t1-t4) while these mediators increased in controls undergoing ELS only. With a clearance of TNF-α of 15,233 pg/min and IL-6 of 10,233 pg/min, 79.2% of TNF-α and 95.3% of IL-6 produced were adsorbed. Systemic vascular resistance decreased significantly in both groups at t0. While it further was reduced during the control experiments at t1 and t2, it returned to normal in the study animals. Cardiac output increased at t0, t1 and t2 in the control experiments. In contrast, in study animals after a peak at t0, it returned to the baseline value and did not vary thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Combined resin-adsorption and ELS improved hemodynamics resulting from effective removal of inflammatory mediators in a pig model of septic shock.