Association between epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and venous thromboembolism among older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk is higher among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and specific subgroups, including the elderly, but little is known about the VTE risk of different generations of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and whether the risk differs by demographic characteristics. This study aims to compare the risk of VTE (deep venous thromboembolism [DVT]; pulmonary embolism [PE]) between a third-generation EGFR-TKI and first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and stratify VTE risk by sex, age, and race/ethnicity in third-generation EGFR-TKI users. METHODS: Via the 2006-2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, this retrospective cohort study included older patients (aged ≥65 years) with advanced NSCLC who initiated on a third-generation EGFR-TKI (n = 493) and first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (n = 1036). We estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) with the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A third-generation EGFR-TKI had a significantly higher VTE risk than first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.01-1.57]; p = .037), with an elevated risk in males (HR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.47-3.19]; p < .001), patients aged ≥75 years (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.04-1.83]; p = .026), and non-Hispanic Whites (HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.10-1.95]; p = .010). Males consistently showed a significantly higher risk of DVT (HR, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.29-4.80]; p = .007) and PE (HR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.29-3.11]; p = .002). A significantly higher risk of DVT (HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.00-2.37]; p = .050) and PE (HR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.06-2.05]; p = .021) was shown in patients aged ≥75 years and non-Hispanic Whites, respectively. Among third-generation EGFR-TKI users, non-Hispanic Whites had a significantly higher risk of VTE (HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.03-4.02]; p = .041) and PE (HR, 2.88 [95% CI, 1.24-6.70]; p = .014) than non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders. CONCLUSIONS: Close monitoring of VTE events in high-risk patients is essential to promote early diagnosis and treatment.

Hepatotoxicity of epidermal growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs).

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most frequently adverse reactions in clinical drug use, usually caused by drugs or herbal compounds. Compared with other populations, cancer patients are more prone to abnormal liver function due to primary or secondary liver malignant tumor, radiation-induced liver injury and other reasons, making potential adverse reactions from liver damage caused by anticancer drugs of particular concernduring clinical treatment process. In recent years, the application of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has changed the treatment status of a series of solid malignant tumors. Unfortunately, the increasing incidence of hepatotoxicitylimits the clinical application of EGFR-TKIs. The mechanisms of liver injury caused by EGFR-TKIs were complex. Despite more than a decade of research, other than direct damage to hepatocytes caused by inhibition of cellular DNA synthesis and resulting in hepatocyte necrosis, the rest of the specific mechanisms remain unclear, and few effective solutions are available. This review focuses on the clinical feature, incidence rates and the recent advances on the discovery of mechanism of hepatotoxicity in EGFR-TKIs, as well as rechallenge and therapeutic strategies underlying hepatotoxicity of EGFR-TKIs.

Feasibility and safety of EGFR-TKI neoadjuvant therapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of neoadjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeted therapy for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. Previous studies have shown that EGFR-TKIs have excellent anti-tumor activity. However, almost all studies on neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC have been non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes and different methods of statistical analysis, which may lead to a lack of valid metrics to assess the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. METHODS: Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Results including objective response rate (ORR), complete resection rate (R0), downstaging rate, pathological complete response (PCR), major pathological response (MPR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were used for further analysis. RESULTS: This meta-analysis ultimately included 11 studies involving 344 patients with EGFR-positive mutations in NSCLC. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR was 57% (95% CI: 42%-73%), and in the Osimertinib subgroup, the pooled ORR was 80% (95% CI: 63%-98%). Analysis of studies that reported a downstaging rate showed the pooled downstaging rate of 41% (95% CI: 9%-74%) and the pooled downstaging rate of 74% (95% CI: 22%-100%) in the Osimertinib subgroup. In terms of surgical outcomes, the pooled pCR rate was 3% (95% CI: 0%-7%), the pooled MPR rate was 11% (95% CI: 6%-17%), and the pooled R0 resection rate was 91% (95% CI: 85%-95%). The most common adverse events associated with neoadjuvant therapy were rash and diarrhea. The pooled incidence of any grade of rash was 47.1% (95% CI: 25.4%-69.3%), and the pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 rash was 0.6% (95% CI: 0.0%-2.5%). The pooled incidence of diarrhea of any grade was 28.8% (95% CI: 14.4%-45.4%), with the pooled incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea of 0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.6%). The pooled incidence of ≥ grade 3 adverse events was significantly lower. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant EGFR-TKIs for the treatment of NSCLC patients with EGFR-positive mutations and that third-generation EGFR-TKIs were superior to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs in terms of shrinking tumor volume and lowering tumor stage; however, future large-scale and multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023466731.

Stepwise prolongation of overall survival from first to third generation EGFR-TKIs for EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project (TREAD 01).

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of new-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has afforded promising overall survival outcomes in clinical trials for non-small-cell lung cancer. We aim to investigate the current adoption rate of these agents and the real-world impact on overall survival among institutions. METHODS: In a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 46 Tokushukai Medical Group hospitals in Japan, we analyzed clinical data of consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving EGFR-TKIs between April 2010 and March 2020. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses examined the associations between overall survival and patient/tumor-related factors and first-line EGFR-TKIs. RESULTS: A total of 758 patients (58.5% females; median age, 73 years) were included. Of 40 patients diagnosed in 2010, 72.5% received gefitinib, whereas 81.3% of 107 patients diagnosed in 2019 received osimertinib as the first-line EGFR-TKI. With a median follow-up of 15.8 months, the median overall survival was 28.4 months (95% confidence interval, 15.3-31.0). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, body mass index, disease status, EGFR mutational status and first-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor were identified as significant prognostic factors after adjusting for background factors including study period, hospital volume and hospital type. The estimated 2-year overall survival rates for gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib and osimertinib were 70.1% (95% confidence interval 59.7-82.4), 67.8% (95% confidence interval 55.3-83.2), 75.5% (95% confidence interval 64.7-88.0) and 90.8% (95% confidence interval 84.8-97.3), respectively. The median time to treatment failure of gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib and osimertinib were 12.8, 8.8, 12.0 and 16.9 months or more, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world data revealed that the swift and widespread utilization of newer-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, and that these newer-generation EGFR-TKIs can prolong overall survival regardless of hospital volume or type. Therefore, osimertinib could be a reasonable first choice treatment for these patients across various clinical practice settings.

The impact of comorbidities, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and drug toxicities on quality of life in lung cancer patients receiving EGFR-TKI therapy.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are used as the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of comorbidities and treatment toxicities on quality of life (QoL) was seldom investigated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the association of comorbidities, adverse events (AEs), and QoL in treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients receiving EGFR-TKI treatments. METHODS: This multi-center prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate QoL and AEs at baseline, the 2nd, 4th, 12th, and 24th week. Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and pre-treatment laboratory data were recorded. QoL was assessed by using the summary score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the dermatology life quality index. The impact of comorbidities, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and AEs on QoL was analyzed by generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were enrolled. Diarrhea (p = 0.033), anorexia (p < 0.001), and NLR ≥4 (p = 0.017) were significantly associated with a QoL impairment. Among skin toxicities, acneiform rash (p = 0.002), pruritus (p = 0.002), visual analogue scale for pruritus (≥3 and < 7, p = 0.006; ≥7, p = 0.001) and pain (1-3, p = 0.041) were associated with a QoL impairment. No significant association was found between comorbidities and QoL changes. CONCLUSION: Diarrhea, anorexia, skin pain, and pruritus may cause a deterioration in QoL in patients receiving EGFR-TKI therapy. NLR may be a potential predictive factor for QoL impairment. Aggressive management and close monitoring for these clinical factors are crucial to improve QoL.

Notch pathway regulates osimertinib drug-tolerant persistence in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has shown marked antitumor activity in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, these effects are transient and most patients develop resistance. Reversible drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cells are defined as a small subpopulation of cells with markedly reduced sensitivity and non-genetic acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Notch is a transmembrane receptor that plays an important role in tumorigenesis. We previously reported that there is significant crosstalk between the Notch and EGFR pathways in NSCLC. Moreover, the Notch pathway is associated with resistance to previous-generation EGFR-TKIs. However, the role of Notch in osimertinib resistance is not fully understood. In this study, we evaluated whether Notch is involved in osimertinib resistance. We show that NOTCH1 and Notch target genes are upregulated in osimertinib DTP cells, and that the addition of a γ-secretase inhibitor (GSI), a Notch inhibitor, impairs drug-tolerant persistence in vitro and in vivo. Compared with osimertinib, combined GSI and osimertinib suppress phospho-ERK partly by enhancing DUSP1 expression. Furthermore, Notch1 and HES1 were upregulated after EGFR-TKI treatment in half of human EGFR-mutated NSCLC tumor tissues. These results suggest that the combination of GSI and osimertinib may be a potential therapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Full spectrum flow cytometry-powered comprehensive analysis of PBMC as biomarkers for immunotherapy in NSCLC with EGFR-TKI resistance.

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy has limited benefits in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) failure. However, data about efficacy of ICI plus chemotherapy remain controversial, probably attributed to the heterogeneity among such population, and robust efficacy biomarkers are urgent to explore. METHODS: A total of 60 eligible patients who received ICI plus chemotherapy after EGFR-TKI treatment failure were enrolled, 24 of whom peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were collected at baseline and after 2 cycles of treatment. We have designed a 23-color-antibody panel to detect PBMC by full spectrum flow cytometry. RESULTS: For EGFR-TKI resistant NSCLC patients: 1) ICI plus chemotherapy achieved an objective response rate (ORR) of 21.7% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.4 months. 2) clinical characteristics associated with worse efficacy included liver metastasis and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) > 200. 3) the proportion of immune cell subset associated with better efficacy was higher baseline effective CD4+T cells (E4). 4) the baseline expression of immune checkpoint proteins (ICPs) on cell subsets associated with better efficacy included: higher expression of CD25 on dendritic cells (DC) and central memory CD8+T cells (CM8), and higher expression of Lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) on effective memory CD8+T cells (EM8). 5) the expression of ICPs after 2 cycles of treatment associated with better efficacy included: higher expression of CD25 on CD8+T/EM8 /natural killer (NK) cells. 6) the dynamic changes of ICPs expression associated with worse efficacy included: significantly decrease of T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) expression on regular T cells (Tregs) and decrease of V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA) expression on Th1. 7) a prediction model for the efficacy of ICI plus chemotherapy was successfully constructed with a sensitivity of 62.5%, specificity of 100%, and area under curve (AUC) = 0.817. CONCLUSIONS: Some EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC patients could indeed benefit from ICI plus chemotherapy, but most patients are primary resistant to immunotherapy. Comprehensive analysis of peripheral immune cells using full spectrum flow cytometry showed that compared to the proportion of cell subsets, the expression type and level of ICPs on immune cells, especially CD25, were significantly correlated with the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Rational application of EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutant NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To determine the role and rational application of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHOD: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the survival outcomes between adjuvant EGFR-TKIs and adjuvant chemotherapy or a placebo, or between different EGFR-TKI treatment durations for resected NSCLC, were eligible for inclusion. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as effective measures using random-effect or fixed-effect models. Subgroup analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs involving 2102 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with or without EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy were included. For all stage IB-IIIA NSCLC patients, EGFR-TKIs adjuvant therapy could not only significantly improve DFS (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.63, P < 0.001) and 2- and 3-year DFS rates, but also improve OS (HR 0.72, 95% CI, 0.54-0.96, P = 0.024), compared with chemotherapy or the placebo. Further subgroup analyses indicated prolonged OS from first-generation EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy in stage III patients, compared with chemotherapy or the placebo (HR for OS, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.63; P = 0.001). Of note, osimertinib adjuvant therapy led to the OS benefit expanding from stage III to stage II-III patients, with significantly improved DFS and a lower risk of brain recurrence, compared with the placebo. A 2-year treatment duration with EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy showed a significantly lower recurrence risk than a ≤ 1-year duration. CONCLUSION: The DFS advantage from first-generation EGFR-TKI adjuvant therapy can translate into an OS benefit in stage III NSCLC patients. Osimertinib might be more suitable for adjuvant therapy than first-generation EGFR-TKIs, because of the lower recurrence rate and the potential OS benefit even in early-stage patients. The optimal treatment duration for EGFR-TKIs at different stages of disease needs to be validated.

Upfront Use of First-/Second-Generation EGFR-TKI Followed by Osimertinib Shows Better Prognosis than Upfront Osimertinib Therapy in Japanese Patients with Non-small-cell Lung Cancer with Exon 19 Deletion: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Clinical evidence on the increased efficacy of sequential epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of upfront use of first-/second-generation TKI followed by osimertinib with upfront osimertinib therapy for each representative EGFR mutation in Japanese patients with NSCLC. Patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC were classified into two groups: first-/second-generation TKI followed by osimertinib (sequential TKI group) and upfront osimertinib groups. The total time to treatment failure (TTF) of TKI therapies, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively evaluated. Of the 74 patients included in the analysis, 38 and 34 patients had exon 19 deletion and L858R, respectively, and other two patients had minor mutations. The sequential TKI group had a significantly longer TTF than the upfront osimertinib group in overall patients (33.2 vs. 11.2 months; p = 0.007) and in the subgroup of exon 19 deletion (36.7 vs. 10.0 months; p = 0.004), but not in the subgroup of L858R (22.6 vs. 15.6 months; p = 0.37). The similar tendency was observed in PFS. OS of the sequential TKI group was significantly longer compared with the upfront osimertinib group in overall patients, the subgroup of exon 19 deletion, and the subgroup of L858R. The upfront use of first-/second-generation TKI followed by osimertinib is one of the feasible and effective strategies in Japanese patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, especially in patients with exon 19 deletion.

Combination of available topical beta-blockers and antibiotic ointment for epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced paronychia and pseudopyogenic granulomas in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Painful paronychia and pseudopyogenic granuloma (PG) are common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with the use of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Multiple local management approaches have been tested with unsatisfactory results. We have introduced an occlusion therapy technique through which available topical drugs for longer than 2 years. METHODS: Based on the cancer registry and case management system of our hospital, from July 2019 to July 2020, we retrospectively enrolled patients with NSCLC who were treated with EGFR-TKIs and received applications of 0.5% timolol ophthalmic solution (TIMOPTOL XE 0.5%®) combined with a neomycin/tyrothricin ointment (Biomycin®) using the occlusion method to treat paronychia or PG. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 66.5 years, most of whom were women (72.7%). Periungual lesion-related pain was reported by all patients, and periungual bleeding and PG were reported in 14% (3/22) and 64% (14/22) of patients, respectively. After the occlusion therapy application of timolol ophthalmic solution combined with neomycin/tyrothricin ointment twice daily, the overall response rate was 83.3%, including complete response in 18% (4/22) of cases and partial response in 68% (15/22) of cases. CONCLUSION: We presented an occlusion method using available topical beta-blockers and antibiotic ointment for EGFR-TKI-induced paronychia and PG in Taiwan. The result is favorable. Further randomized control trial is urgent to validate our findings.

[Expert consensus on icotinib as adjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer].

Clinical studies have established the clinical application of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) adjuvant targeted therapy. Compared with chemotherapy, the high efficiency and low toxicity of targeted therapy increases the survival benefit of patients. Icotinib was the first EGFR-TKI with independent intellectual property rights in China and the third EGFR-TKI to be marketed in the world. In order to summarize the experience of icotinib and other EGFR-TKIs in the adjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and further standardize and guide the clinical application of icotinib, experts from the China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care and the Guangdong Association of Thoracic Diseases have organized an expert consensus on the adjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with icotinib, which is expected to provide clinicians with evidence-based medical evidences for postoperative targeted drug using.

Long-term response in a patient with adenocarcinoma harboring both common and uncommon EGFR mutations.

Recently, we read a paper "Dacomitinib overcomes afatinib-refractory carcinomatous meningitis in a lung cancer patient harbouring EGFR Ex.19 deletion and G724S mutation" published in Investigational New Drugs. Their patient had a very rare compound EGFR mutation. To share our experience, we present a case of 58-year-old man with a long-term response to afatinib in a patient with previously unreported compound EGFR mutation. In patients with rare compound EGFR mutations, afatinib might be one of the treatment option.

Osteosclerotic change as a therapeutic response to gefitinib in symptomatic non-small cell lung cancer bone metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in the overall survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, the effects of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment on bone metastasis remain unclear. This study investigated radiological responses to gefitinib regarding bone metastasis in patients. METHODS: We treated 260 patients with NSCLC and symptomatic bone metastasis. Thirty-seven patients harboring EGFR mutation were treated with gefitinib for more than 30 days and followed up for more than 3 months (GEF group). We performed a retrospective observational study by selecting 36 cases without EGFR-TKI treatment, at least 3 months of follow-up, and at least two radiological evaluations as the control group. We assessed the best overall radiological response, interval from treatment initiation to appearance of a radiological response, and the local response maintenance rate. RESULTS: The best effect in the GEF group was 98% partial response or better, which was significantly higher than the 57% observed in the control group (p < 0.001). The GEF and control groups maintained 83% and 42% local response maintenance rates at one year, respectively (p < 0.001). In the GEF with radiotherapy group, the local response maintenance rate was maintained at 92% at 1 year, while in the GEF without RT group, there was a decrease in the local response maintenance rate from 270 days. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib treatment for bone metastases in patients harboring EGFR mutation resulted in a beneficial osteosclerotic change in most patients. Combined gefitinib and radiotherapy provide long-lasting local control of bone metastases.

Elevated serum creatine kinase levels due to osimertinib: A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Osimertinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor. Elevated serum creatine kinase level is an uncommon adverse event associated with osimertinib treatment for lung cancer. CASE REPORT: We report a previously healthy 56-year-old woman who developed elevated serum creatine kinase levels during osimertinib monotherapy for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: During treatment, she experienced leg cramps and her serum creatine kinase levels increased, peaking at 989 U/l. Further investigation revealed no evidence of cardiotoxicity or myositis; thus, osimertinib-induced myopathy was assumed to be the cause of her elevated serum creatine kinase levels. We successfully managed both lung cancer and osimertinib-induced myopathy using 1-week pauses of osimertinib therapy without dose reduction. DISCUSSION: Short-term suspension of osimertinib without dose reduction may be a reasonable option for osimertinib-induced myopathy.

Phase I/II study of erlotinib plus S-1 for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 0808/0913.

Introduction In preclinical data, the combination therapy with S-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) had a synergistic antitumor effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of the EGFR mutation status. Patients and Methods Patients with previously treated NSCLC and adequate organ function regardless of EGFR mutation status were eligible for the phase I study, with wild-type EGFR were eligible for the phase II study. Treatment consisted of erlotinib 150 mg/body orally once every day and S-1 60 mg/m2, 70 mg/m2, or 80 mg/m2 (level 0, level 1, or level 2) orally on days 1-14 every three weeks. The primary endpoint for the phase I study was the determination of the recommended dose (RD), the phase II study was the overall response rate (ORR). Results A total of 7 patients with performance-status (PS) 0 or 1 were enrolled as subjects in phase I. Five of these subjects were EGFR-mutation positive. Four subjects were enrolled at S-1 dose level 1 and 3 were enrolled at S-1 dose level 2. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in these subjects. The RD was decided as erlotinib 150 mg/body and S-1 80 mg/m2. In phase I, 5 subjects achieved partial response, and the ORR was 71.4%. A total of 10 patients with PS 0, 1, or 2 EGFR-wild type NSCLC were enrolled in phase II. In phase II, the ORR was 10.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 40.0%. After the enrollment of 10 subjects, enrollment was stopped based on two treatment-related deaths. Conclusion The combination therapy of erlotinib plus S-1 was not feasible in the EGFR wild-type NSCLC at least and early stopped. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier: 000003421 (2010/03/31, phase I), 000003422 (2010/03/31, Phase II).

Primary Tumor Resection Is Associated with a Better Outcome among Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Receiving EGFR-TKI Treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The characteristics and efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with primary tumor resection (PTR) is not yet clear. METHODS: We enrolled advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy to access the impact of PTR on the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 466 patients were enrolled with 76 patients (16.3%) undergoing PTR; 59 patients recurred after curative surgery, while 17 patients underwent surgery as diagnostic purposes. PTR patients displayed a better performance status, a lower metastatic burden, and much less measurable diseases (30.3 vs. 97.4%, p < 0.001). PTR patients experienced a significantly longer progression-free survival (25.1 [95% CI 16.6-33.7] vs. 9.4 [95% CI 8.4-10.4] months; aHR 0.40 [95% CI 0.30-0.54], p < 0.001) and overall survival (56.8 [95% CI 36.3-77.2] vs. 31.8 [95% CI 28.2-35.4] months; aHR 0.57 [95% CI 0.39-0.84], p = 0.004). Survival advantage was still observed while comparing PTR patients with the better performance and lower metastatic burden subgroup found within the non-resection group. Moreover, the progression-free survival and overall survival of 11 patients who were found having pleural metastases during surgery and underwent PTR plus pleural biopsy, were also longer than those with pure N0--1/M1a-malignant pleural effusion disease in the non-resection group (n = 19) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: PTR was associated with significantly better outcomes in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKI. Further studies are needed to evaluate the biological role of PTR among these patients.

Lower starting dose of afatinib for the treatment of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma harboring exon 21 and exon 19 mutations.

BACKGROUND: Afatinib has shown favorable response rates (RRs) and longer progression free survival (PFS) in lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutations compared with standard platinum-based chemotherapy. However, serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) limit the clinical application of afatinib. METHODS: We designed a retrospective study, enrolling all patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma who were diagnosed and treated with 30 or 40 mg daily afatinib as their initial treatment in three Kaohsiung Medical University-affiliated hospitals in Taiwan. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 102 (57%) and 77 (43%) received 30 mg and 40 mg afatinib daily as their initial treatment, respectively. The patients initially using 30 mg afatinib daily had a similar RR (75% vs. 83%, p = 0.1672), median PFS (14.5 vs. 14.8 months, log-rank p = 0.4649), and median OS (34.0 vs. 25.2 months, log-rank p = 0.5982) compared with those initially using 40 mg afatinib daily. Patients initially receiving 30 mg afatinib daily had fewer ADRs compared with those using 40 mg daily. The overall incidence of moderate and severe ADRs was significantly lower in patients receiving 30 mg afatinib daily compared with those using 40 mg daily (49% vs. 77%, p = 0.002); similar findings was observed in terms of severe ADRs (7% vs. 24%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients receiving 30 mg afatinib daily as their initial treatment had similar RR, PFS, OS, but significantly fewer serious ADRs, as compared with those using 40 mg as their starting dose.

Purpuric drug eruptions induced by EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are associated with IQGAP1-mediated increase in vascular permeability.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are used as a treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer. There have been some reports of EGFR-TKIs being associated with vascular adverse events. We found that EGFR-TKIs decreased the proliferation of HMEC-1s (immortalized human dermal microvascular endothelial cells) and HMVECs (human dermal microvascular endothelial cells), and also inhibited the phosphorylation of EGFR and ERK. We examined the mRNA expression profile of erlotinib-treated HMEC-1s and identified IQ motif containing GTPase activating protein 1 (IQGAP1) as the most consistently up-regulated transcript and protein. IQGAP1 was also overexpressed and co-localized with endothelial cells in the lesional skin. Notably, increased IQGAP1 expression was associated with decreased transendothelial electrical resistance and increased vascular permeability in vitro. Erlotinib treatment enriched the staining of IQGAP1 and reduced the intensities of α-catenin at the sites of cell-cell contact. In conclusion, erlotinib induces adherens junction dysfunction by modulating the expression of IQGAP1 in dermal endothelial cells. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Selection of Oral Therapeutics in China for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: Intravenous administration of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has been the backbone of treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) for decades. The availability of oral capecitabine has improved the tolerability and simplified combination schedules. In addition to capecitabine, several other oral drugs have proven efficacy, particularly in palliative treatment lines. Clinical guidelines describe several available third-line treatment options for metastatic CRC (mCRC), but few insights are provided to guide the selection and sequence. In this review, we describe the available evidence and most recent data concerning oral drugs with proven efficacy in CRC, including antiangiogenetic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs), inhibitors blocking EGFR/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and modified fluoropyrimidine, and share recommendations and insights on selecting third-line oral therapies for mCRC in China. In general, third-line treatment options for mCRC are mainly regorafenib, fruquintinib, and chemo/targeted therapy reintroduction, while FTD/TPI was rarely used in China probably due to poor accessibility. Fruquintinib is preferred in patients with poor performance status (PS), elder age, and severe organ dysfunction, compared to regorafenib. New drugs of clinical trials were more recommended for the patients with BRAF mutant tumor, and those with good previous treatment efficacy tended to be recommended for chemo/targeted therapy reintroduction. The management of mCRC is evolving, and it must be emphasized that the consideration and recommendations presented here reflect current treatment practices in China and thus might change according to new clinical data as well as the availability of new oral drugs.

Yang-Yin-Jie-Du decoction overcomes gefitinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer via down-regulation of the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway.

CONTEXT: Yang-Yin-Jie-Du Decoction (YYJDD) was used to improve gefitinib efficacy in our clinical practice, but its mechanism remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study explored if YYJDD could reverse gefitinib resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: H1975 cells were exposed to control, 10 µM gefitinib, 3.2 mg/mL YYJDD or combination treatment. Cell viability was detected by MTT during 0-96 h. Apoptosis and the PI3K/Akt proteins were tested by flow cytometry and western-blot at 24 h. LY294002 was applied to further determine the role of the PI3K/Akt. 23 BALB/c nude xenograft mice received normal saline (n = 5), 80 mg/kg gefitinib (n = 6), 2.35 g/kg lyophilised powder of YYJDD (n = 6) or combination treatment (n = 6) by gavage for 4 weeks and submitted to TUNEL, immunohistochemistry, and western-blot. RESULTS: In vitro, gefitinib (IC50: 20.68 ± 2.06 µM) and YYJDD (IC50: 6.6 ± 0.21 mg/mL) acted in a moderate synergistic way. Combination treatment inhibited cell viability from 100% to 25.66%. Compared to gefitinb (33.23 ± 3.99%), cell apoptosis was increased with combination treatment (54.11 ± 7.32%), accompanied by down-regulation of the PI3K/Akt. LY294002 further inhibited cell viability, increased apoptosis, and down-regulated p-Akt/Akt. In vivo, the tumour sizes in the combination group (1165.13 ± 157.79 mm3) were smaller than gefitinib alone (1630.66 ± 208.30 mm3). The positive rate of TUNEL staining was increased by combination treatment (22.33 ± 2.75%) versus gefitinib (7.37 ± 0.87%), while the PI3K/Akt was down-regulated. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: YYJDD has potential to overcome gefitinib resistance. Future investigations should be focussed on its specific targets.