Clinical frailty is a risk factor of adverse outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy: analysis of 2011-2017 US hospitals.

Frailty is an aggregate of medical and geriatric conditions that affect elderly and vulnerable patients; as frailty is known to affect postoperative outcomes, we evaluate the effects of frailty in patients undergoing esophageal resection surgery for esophageal cancer. 2011-2017 National Inpatient Sample was used to isolate younger (18 to <65) and older (65 or greater) patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, substratified using frailty (defined by Johns-Hopkins ACG frailty indicator) into frail patients and non-frail controls; the controls were 1:1 matched with frail patients using propensity score. Endpoints included mortality, length of stay (LOS), costs, discharge disposition, and postsurgical complications. Following the match, there were 363 and equal number controls in younger cohort; 383 and equal number controls in older cohort. For younger cohort, frail patients had higher mortality (odds ratio [OR] 3.14 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-7.09), LOS (20.5 vs. 13.6 days), costs ($320,074 vs. $190,235) and were likely to be discharged to skilled nursing facilities; however, there was no difference in postsurgical complications. In multivariate, frail patients had higher mortality (aOR 3.00 95%CI 1.29-6.99). In older cohort, frail patients had higher mortality (OR 1.96 95%CI 1.07-3.60), LOS (19.9 vs. 14.3 days), costs ($301,335 vs. $206,648) and were more likely to be discharged to short-term hospitals or skilled nursing facilities; the frail patients were more likely to suffer postsurgical respiratory failure (OR 2.03 95%CI 1.31-3.15). In multivariate, frail patients had higher mortality (aOR 1.93 95%CI 1.04-3.58). Clinical frailty adversely affects both younger and older patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Long-term survival outcomes of esophageal cancer after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the long-term overall and disease-free survival and factors associated with overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing a totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MILE) at a safety-net hospital. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent MILE from September 2013 to November 2017. Overall and disease-free survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimates, and hazard ratios (HR) were derived from multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients underwent MILE during the study period. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 83.2%, 61.9%, and 55.9%, respectively. Disease-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 83.2%, 60.6%, and 47.5%, respectively. Overall survival (p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (p < 0.001) differed across pathological stages. By multivariable analysis, increasing age (HR, 1.06; p = 0.02), decreasing Karnofsky performance status score (HR, 0.94; p = 0.002), presence of stage IV disease (HR, 5.62; p = 0.002), locoregional recurrence (HR, 2.94; p = 0.03), and distant recurrence (HR, 4.78; p < 0.001) were negatively associated with overall survival. Overall survival significantly declined within 2 years and was independently associated with stage IV disease (HR, 3.29; p = 0.04) and distant recurrence (HR, 5.78; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MILE offers favorable long-term overall and disease-free survival outcomes. Age, Karnofsky performance status score, stage IV, and disease recurrence are shown to be prognostic factors of overall survival. Prospective studies comparing long-term outcomes after different MIE approaches are warranted to validate survival outcomes after MILE.

Use of esophageal stents to relieve dysphagia during neoadjuvant therapy prior to esophageal resection: a systematic review.

Esophageal cancer stenting offers symptomatic relief for patients suffering from dysphagia. There are limited data to support their use to relieve dysphagia and improve nutrition during neoadjuvant therapy with some concern that they may negatively impact oncological outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the impact of esophageal stents on outcomes prior to resection with curative intent. A literature search was performed using Embase, Medline, PubMed, PubMed Central, the Cochrane library for articles pertaining to esophageal stent use prior to or during neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients planned for curative esophagectomy. Data extracted included basic demographics, clinical, nutritional and oncologic outcomes. A total of 9 studies involving 465 patients were included. Esophageal stent use resulted in a significant improvement in mean dysphagia scores in the immediate post stent period but failed to demonstrate any positive changes in weight, body mass index (BMI) or albumin. Only 33% of stented patients ultimately progressed to potential curative surgical resection and stents were associated with reduced R0 resection rates and lower overall survival. This systematic review shows that, although esophageal stenting is associated with improvements in dysphagia during neoadjuvant therapy, their effect on improving patient nutritional status is less clear and they may be associated with poorer long-term oncological outcomes. Stents should be used with caution in patients who are being considered for potentially curative resection of esophageal malignancies and other strategies of nutritional supplementation should be considered.

Barrett's Registry Collaboration of academic centers in Ireland reveals high progression rate of low-grade dysplasia and low risk from nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus: report of the RIBBON network.

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the main pathological precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or EAC from nondysplastic BE (NDBE), low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and indefinite for dysplasia (IND) varies widely between population-based studies and specialized centers for many reasons, principally the rigor of the biopsy protocol and the accuracy of pathologic definition. In the Republic of Ireland, a multicenter prospective registry and bioresource (RIBBON) was established in 2011 involving six academic medical centers, and this paper represents the first report from this network. A detailed clinical, endoscopic and pathologic database registered 3,557 patients. BE was defined strictly by both endoscopic evidence of Barrett's epithelium and the presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM). A prospective web-based database was used to gather information with initial and follow-up data abstracted by a data manager at each site. A total of 2,244 patients, 1,925 with no dysplasia, were included with complete follow-up. The median age at diagnosis was 60.5 with a 2.1:1 male to female ratio and a median follow-up time of 2.7 years (IQR 1.19-4.04), and 6609.25 person years. In this time period, 125 (5.57%) progressed to HGD/EAC, with 74 (3.3%) after 1 year of follow-up and 38 (1.69%) developed EAC, with 20 (0.89%) beyond 1 year. The overall incidence of HGD/EAC was 1.89% per year; 1.16% if the first year is excluded. The risk of progression to EAC alone overall was 0.57% per year, 0.31% excluding the first year, and 0.21% in the 1,925 patients who had SIM alone at diagnosis. Low-grade dysplasia (LGD) progressed to HGD/EAC in 31% of patients, a progression rate of 12.96% per year, 6.71% with the first year excluded. In a national collaboration of academic centers in Ireland, the progression rate for NDBE was similar to recent population studies. Almost one in two who progressed was evident within 1 year. Crucially, LGD diagnosed and confirmed by specialist gastrointestinal pathologists represents truly high-risk disease, highlighting the importance of expertise in diagnosis and management, and providing indirect support for ablative therapies in this context.

Esophageal reconstruction by colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer analysis of current indications, operative outcomes, and long-term survival.

INTRODUCTION: Colon interposition is an alternative solution for esophageal reconstruction if the stomach cannot be used. The study reviews current indications and results of coloplasty for cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent colon interposition for gastro-esophageal malignancy were included. Primary coloplasty was defined as upfront colon interposition. Salvage coloplasty was defined as colon interposition after primary reconstruction failure. Mortality, morbidity, function, and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: We included 28 patients (24 men, median age 61 years). Ten (36%) patients underwent primary coloplasty due to previous gastrectomy (n = 5), conduit gastric cancer (n = 2), extensive gastroesophageal involvement (n = 2), and gastric cancer recurrence (n = 1). Salvage coloplasty was performed in 18 (64%) patients for postoperative graft necrosis (n = 5) and intractable strictures (n = 3). Operative mortality, morbidity, and graft necrosis rates were 14% (4/28), 86% (24/28), and 14% (4/28), respectively; there were no significant differences between primary and salvage coloplasty. Survival rates at 1-, 3-, and 5 years were 81%, 51%, and 38%, respectively. Survival was decreased after primary coloplasty when compared to salvage coloplasty (P = 0.03). Nine patients experienced tumor recurrence (primary: n = 6, salvage: n = 3) after coloplasty and eight of them died. CONCLUSION: Colon interposition after esophagectomy is a useful but morbid endeavor. Colon interposition as salvage therapy is associated with improved survival compared to its use as primary esophageal replacement, and colon interposition in the latter cohort should be used with caution due to poor cancer-specific survival in this patient population.

Recommendations for clinical staging (cTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals.

We report analytic and consensus processes that produced recommendations for clinical stage groups (cTNM) of esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer for the AJCC/UICC cancer staging manuals, 8th edition. The Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration (WECC) provided data on 22,123 clinically staged patients with epithelial esophageal cancers. Risk-adjusted survival for each patient was developed using random survival forest analysis from which (1) data-driven clinical stage groups were identified wherein survival decreased monotonically and was distinctive between and homogeneous within groups and (2) data-driven anatomic clinical stage groups based only on cTNM. The AJCC Upper GI Task Force, by smoothing, simplifying, expanding, and assessing clinical applicability, produced (3) consensus clinical stage groups. Compared with pTNM, cTNM survival was "pinched," with poorer survival for early cStage groups and better survival for advanced ones. Histologic grade was distinctive for data-driven grouping of cT2N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and cT1-2N0M0 adenocarcinoma, but consensus removed it. Grouping was different by histopathologic cell type. For SCC, cN0-1 was distinctive for cT3 but not cT1-2, and consensus removed cT4 subclassification and added subgroups 0, IVA, and IVB. For adenocarcinoma, N0-1 was distinctive for cT1-2 but not cT3-4a, cStage II subgrouping was necessary (T1N1M0 [IIA] and T2N0M0 [IIB]), advanced cancers cT3-4aN0-1M0 plus cT2N1M0 comprised cStage III, and consensus added subgroups 0, IVA, and IVB. Treatment decisions require accurate cStage, which differs from pStage. Understaging and overstaging are problematic, and additional factors, such as grade, may facilitate treatment decisions and prognostication until clinical staging techniques are uniformly applied and improved.

Imaging of uncommon esophageal malignancies.

Malignant esophageal neoplasms other than squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma are uncommon and include endocrine tumors, lymphoid malignancies, melanoma, malignant stromal tumors, and secondary tumors (metastases). Imaging, though not diagnostic in many cases, helps in selecting the appropriate treatment strategy by determining the anatomic extent of the tumor and locoregional and distant spread. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the imaging features of these uncommon esophageal malignancies.

Swallowing the Unexpected: A Case Report on an Unusual Presentation of Esophageal Malignancy.

Head and neck malignancies presenting with a neck abscess as the primary symptom are uncommon and may result in a misdiagnosis or delay in diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Here we report on a rare case where a young adult presented with signs and symptoms of a retropharyngeal abscess, which was later identified as an esophageal malignancy.

Synchronous multiple primary neoplasms of the esophagus, rectosigmoid and central nervous system.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple primary neoplasms (MPN) are rare and can affect any system especially the upper aero-digestive system. They can be simultaneous, synchronous or metachronous. Their management depends on the individual organ system affected and simultaneous resection is possible as shown by T. Suzuki. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We encountered a 77-year-old male who had had malena and constipation for 2 months and on investigation was found to have a rectosigmoid and an esophageal adenocarcinoma as well as a calcified lesion in the brain. He underwent surgery for the rectosigmoid growth only (according to the patient's preference) and received chemotherapy. Unfortunately, he developed acute intestinal obstruction after 2 cycles of chemotherapy and died. DISCUSSION: MPNS are defined as presence of two or more histologically distinct tumours in the same individual. It can be synchronous or metachronous. Various factors like genetic and environmental play crucial role in its development. Management of these depends up on the status of the patient, stage of disease. CONCLUSION: MPNS are rare but their rising trend suggests it should be kept in mind while working up a patient with any malignancy.

Causal Relationships of Chronic Constipation and Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Digestive Tract Cancers: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) manifest as prevalent gastrointestinal disorders, while digestive tract cancers (DTCs) present formidable challenges to global well-being. However, extant observational studies proffer uncertain insights into potential causal relationships of constipation and IBS with susceptibility to DTCs. METHODS: We executed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to establish causal connections between these conditions and seven distinct categories of DTCs, including colorectal carcinoma (CRC), hepatocellular cancer (HCC), esophageal malignancy (ESCA), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD), biliary tract carcinoma (BTCs), gastric carcinoma (GC), and small intestine neoplasm (SIC). Leveraging instrumental variables (IVs) obtained from GWAS data of the FinnGen database, we employed a range of analytical methodologies, including inverse-variance weighting multiplicative random effects (IVW_MRE), inverse-variance weighting fixed effects (IVW_FE), maximum likelihood (ML), weighted median (WM), MR‒Egger regression, and the MR-PRESSO test. RESULTS: We observed a substantial linkage between genetically predicted constipation and increased vulnerability to PAAD (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.422-3.69, P = 0.001) via the IVW method. Following the removal of outlier SNPs through MR-PRESSO, genetically predicted IBS was affiliated with an increased risk of CRC (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1-1.37, P = 0.05). Nonetheless, decisive causal correlations of constipation or IBS with other DTCs remain elusive. CONCLUSION: In summary, genetically predicted constipation was associated with an augmented PAAD risk, and IBS was associated with an increased CRC susceptibility within European cohorts, in agreement with some observational studies. Nevertheless, the causal associations of constipation and IBS with other DTCs remain inconclusive.

Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution.

OBJECTIVE: Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy accounts for a growing proportion of esophagectomies, potentially due to improved technical capabilities simplifying the challenging aspects of standard minimally invasive esophagectomy. However, there is limited evidence directly comparing both operations. The objective is to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison with the minimally invasive esophagectomy approach for patients with esophageal cancer over a 7-year period at a high-volume center. The primary end points of this study were overall survival and disease-free survival. Secondary end points included operation-specific morbidity, lymph node yield, readmission status, and in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality. METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy or standard minimally invasive esophagectomy over a 7-year period were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Inclusion criteria were patients with stage I to III disease, operations performed past the learning curve, and no evidence of scleroderma or cirrhosis. A 1:3 propensity match (robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy:minimally invasive esophagectomy) for multiple clinical covariates was performed to identify the final study cohort. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the 2 operations. RESULTS: A total of 734 patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (n = 630) or robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (n = 104) for esophageal cancer were identified. After exclusions and matching, a total cohort of 246 patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (n = 65) or minimally invasive esophagectomy (n = 181) were identified. There was no difference in overall survival (P = .69) or disease-free survival (P = .70). There were no significant differences in rates of major morbidity: pneumonia (17% vs 17%, P = .34), chylothorax (8% vs 9%, P = .95), recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (0% vs 1.5%, P = 1), anastomotic leak (5% vs 4%, P = .49), intraoperative complications (9% vs 8%, P = .73), or complete resection rates (99% vs 96%, P = .68). There was no difference in in-hospital (P = .89), 30-day (P = .66) or 90-day mortality (P = .73) between both cohorts. The robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy cohort yielded a higher median lymph node harvest in comparison with the minimally invasive esophagectomy cohort (32 vs 29, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy may improve lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy and robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy are otherwise associated with similar mortality, morbidity, and perioperative outcomes. Further prospective study is required to investigate whether improved lymph node resection may translate to improved oncologic outcomes.

Recommendations for Surveillance and Management of Recurrent Esophageal Cancer Following Endoscopic Therapies.

With advancing endoscopic technology and screening protocols for Barrett disease, more patients are being diagnosed with early-stage esophageal cancer. These early-stage patients may be amendable to endoscopic therapies, such as endomucosal resection and ablation. These therapies may minimize morbidity, but the elevated risk of recurrence cannot be overlooked. This article reports outcomes and recommendations for surveillance and management of recurrent esophageal cancer following endoscopic therapies.

Clinical impact of FDG PET/CT in alimentary tract malignancies: an updated review.

The use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) is well established in the evaluation of alimentary tract malignancies. This review of the literature and demonstration of correlative images focuses on the current role of PET/CT in the diagnosis (including pathologic/clinical staging) and post-therapy follow-up of esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers. PET/CT provides utility in the management of esophageal cancer, including detection of distant disease prior to resection. In gastric cancer, PET/CT is useful in detecting solid organ metastases and in characterizing responders vs. non-responders after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the latter of which have poorer overall survival. In patients with GIST tumors, PET/CT also determines response to imatinib therapy with greater expedience as compared to CECT. For colorectal cancer, PET/CT has proven helpful in detecting hepatic and other distant metastases, treatment response, and differentiating post-radiation changes from tumor recurrence. Our review also highlights several pitfalls in PET/CT interpretation of alimentary tract lesions.

A Pseudo-Infarction Pattern in the Setting of Esophageal Malignancy.

A 57-year-old African American male was admitted for workup of unintentional weight loss. He was found to have an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Electrocardiogram (ECG) readings demonstrated deep Q waves in leads V1-V2 with T wave flattening, which raised concern for a septal infarct. Myocardial infarction (MI) was subsequently ruled out through clinical, imaging, and laboratory analysis. The ECG findings were deemed as a pseudo-infarct pattern in the setting of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Literature Review.

Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the esophagus is an uncommon type of esophageal cancer that contains both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma elements. Data on this biologically unique type of cancer are limited and mainly stem from case reports and small case series. We performed an audit of the available literature and synthesized a review on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, histopathology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of ASCs. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the esophagus is a rare type of esophageal cancer. Histological examination is necessary to confirm the diagnosis of ASC and patients usually receive multimodal treatment. Patient outcomes are not well defined and further research could help us better understand the pathophysiology and unique needs of patients with this rare malignancy.