Enrolling High-Acuity Emergency General Surgery Patients in a Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Over three million patients are admitted to hospitals annually with high-acuity conditions mandating emergency abdominal or skin/soft-tissue operation. Patients with these high-acuity emergency general surgery (HA-EGS) diseases experience significant morbidity/mortality, yet the quality of life (QOL) impact on survivors is not well studied. Acuity, transfer patterns, and adverse social determinants of health (SDOH) documented in epidemiologic studies are cited reasons for inability to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among HA-EGS survivors. We conducted a feasibility study to understand facilitators and barriers of conducting a prospective study of changes in QOL after surviving HA-EGS. From September 2019 to April 2021, we collected baseline (pre-admission) and 30/60-days post-surgery data on activities of daily living, depression, self-efficacy, resilience, pain, work limitations, social support, and substance use from patients who enrolled during index hospitalization. 100 patients were consented to participate in the study (71.9% enrollment rate). The retention rate was 65.9% for 30-day calls and 53.8% for 60-day calls. Median time to complete each time point remained under 25 minutes. Patients with a longer length of stay and nicotine users didn't complete their 30-day interview while those with systemic complications didn't complete their 60-day interview. These results set the foundation for future PRO studies.

MRI-based radiomic models to predict surgical margin status and infer tumor immune microenvironment in breast cancer patients with breast-conserving surgery: a multicenter validation study.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate preoperative estimation of the risk of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) resection margin positivity would be beneficial to surgical planning. In this multicenter validation study, we developed an MRI-based radiomic model to predict the surgical margin status. METHODS: We retrospectively collected preoperative breast MRI of patients undergoing BCS from three hospitals (SYMH, n = 296; SYSUCC, n = 131; TSPH, n = 143). Radiomic-based model for risk prediction of the margin positivity was trained on the SYMH patients (7:3 ratio split for the training and testing cohorts), and externally validated in the SYSUCC and TSPH cohorts. The model was able to stratify patients into different subgroups with varied risk of margin positivity. Moreover, we used the immune-radiomic models and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) signature to infer the distribution patterns of immune cells and tumor cell EMT status under different marginal status. RESULTS: The AUCs of the radiomic-based model were 0.78 (0.66-0.90), 0.88 (0.79-0.96), and 0.76 (0.68-0.84) in the testing cohort and two external validation cohorts, respectively. The actual margin positivity rates ranged between 0-10% and 27.3-87.2% in low-risk and high-risk subgroups, respectively. Positive surgical margin was associated with higher levels of EMT and B cell infiltration in the tumor area, as well as the enrichment of B cells, immature dendritic cells, and neutrophil infiltration in the peritumoral area. CONCLUSIONS: This MRI-based predictive model can be used as a reliable tool to predict the risk of margin positivity of BCS. Tumor immune-microenvironment alteration was associated with surgical margin status. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study can assist the pre-operative planning of BCS. Further research on the tumor immune microenvironment of different resection margin states is expected to develop new margin evaluation indicators and decipher the internal mechanism. KEY POINTS: • The MRI-based radiomic prediction model (CSS model) incorporating features extracted from multiple sequences and segments could estimate the margin positivity risk of breast-conserving surgery. • The radiomic score of the CSS model allows risk stratification of patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery, which could assist in surgical planning. • With the help of MRI-based radiomics to estimate the components of the immune microenvironment, for the first time, it is found that the margin status of breast-conserving surgery is associated with the infiltration of immune cells in the microenvironment and the EMT status of breast tumor cells.

Association of High BMI With Morbidity and Mortality in Common Emergency General Surgery Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients are at increased risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. Obesity is a risk factor for poor outcomes in this population. Our study aimed to explore the association of body mass index (BMI) with postoperative outcomes in patients requiring common EGS procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of the 2018-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database identified patients undergoing four common EGS procedures: large bowel resection, small bowel resection, cholecystectomy, and appendectomy. Patients were classified by BMI: normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), obesity classes I (30-34.9 kg/m2), II (35-39.9 kg/m2), III (40-49.9 kg/m2), and IV (≥50 kg/m2). Main outcomes of interest were major adverse event (MAE) and mortality. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2020, a total of 82,540 patients underwent one of four common EGS procedures. On unadjusted analysis, obesity class IV had higher mortality rates compared to classes I-III (6.2% vs 3.1%, P < 0.001). Patients in obesity classes I-III had lower odds of MAE and death relative to those of normal weight. Compared to other patients with obesity, those in obesity class IV were at increased risk of MAE (odds ratio 1.27; 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.44) and death (odds ratio 1.69; 95% confidence interval 1.34-2.13). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with varying degrees of obesity have different risk profiles following common EGS procedures. While patients in lower obesity classes had reduced odds of adverse outcomes, those with BMI ≥50 kg/m2 were particularly at greater risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. This vulnerable population warrants further investigation and increased vigilance to ensure high-quality care.

Adjusting the Split: Examining Complications After Emergency Exploratory Laparotomy in Older Adults.

INTRODUCTION: Older adults experience higher rates of complications after an emergency exploratory laparotomy (EEL). To better understand the shift to an aging population in the United States, identifying how age may influence these complications in older patients is important. The current standard age category for older adult patients is ≥65. We analyzed postlaparotomy complications using a lower age split. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done on patients who required an EEL from October 2015 to December 2019 at an academic medical center. Patient demographics and hospital course variables were collected. Differences in complications in patients aged ≥/<55 y and ≥/<65 y were measured using univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: A total of 481 patients were reviewed. Both patient groups of ≥55 and ≥65 were typically male, White, had 3+ comorbidities, Medicare insurance, were retired, and presented in extremis to the emergency department. Patients aged ≥55 y had significant rates of pulmonary complications and inpatient mortality (odds ratio 2.2, 2.7, respectively). Patients aged ≥65 y had significant rates of genitourinary and cardiac complications (odds ratio 2.3, 1.8, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged ≥55 y undergoing EEL had higher odds of experiencing pulmonary complications and death during their index hospitalizations, which was not present with the standard ≥/<65-y-old patient analysis. Those aged ≥65 y experienced index genitourinary and cardiac complications. The ≥/<55 age split has a unique set of complications that should be considered. Given the increased odds of inpatient mortality and types of complications in patients aged ≥55 y, the current age split for older adults should be reconsidered.

Performance of ChatGPT on American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Preparation Questions.

INTRODUCTION: Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a large language model capable of generating human-like text. This study sought to evaluate ChatGPT's performance on Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE) self-assessment questions. METHODS: General surgery multiple choice questions were randomly selected from the SCORE question bank. ChatGPT (GPT-3.5, April-May 2023) evaluated questions and responses were recorded. RESULTS: ChatGPT correctly answered 123 of 200 questions (62%). ChatGPT scored lowest on biliary (2/8 questions correct, 25%), surgical critical care (3/10, 30%), general abdomen (1/3, 33%), and pancreas (1/3, 33%) topics. ChatGPT scored higher on biostatistics (4/4 correct, 100%), fluid/electrolytes/acid-base (4/4, 100%), and small intestine (8/9, 89%) questions. ChatGPT answered questions with thorough and structured support for its answers. It scored 56% on ethics questions and provided coherent explanations regarding end-of-life discussions, communication with coworkers and patients, and informed consent. For many questions answered incorrectly, ChatGPT provided cogent, yet factually incorrect descriptions, including anatomy and steps of operations. In two instances, it gave a correct explanation but chose the wrong answer. It did not answer two questions, stating it needed additional information to determine the next best step in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT answered 62% of SCORE questions correctly. It performed better at questions requiring standard recall but struggled with higher-level questions that required complex clinical decision making, despite providing detailed responses behind its rationale. Due to its mediocre performance on this question set and sometimes confidently-worded, yet factually inaccurate responses, caution should be used when interpreting ChatGPT's answers to general surgery questions.

A Gravid Situation: General Surgery Faculty Support for Pregnant Surgical Residents.

INTRODUCTION: The perceptions of teaching faculty toward pregnant general surgery residents have been overlooked despite the daily interactions amongst these groups. METHODS: A 32-question survey designed to measure general surgery teaching faculty perceptions toward pregnant residents was distributed electronically from March 2022 to April 2022 to general surgery teaching faculty in the United States. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize responses and differences in perceptions, and qualitative analysis identified recurring themes from free-text responses. RESULTS: Among 163 respondents included in the final analysis, 58.5% were male and 41.5% were female. Despite 99.4% of surgeons feeling comfortable if a resident told them they were pregnant, 22.4% of surgeons disagreed that their institutions have supportive cultures toward pregnancy. Almost half (45.4%) have witnessed negative comments about pregnant residents and half (50.3%) believe that pregnant surgical residents are discriminated against by their coresidents. Nearly two-thirds of surgeons (64.8%) believe that someone should have a child whenever they wish during training. Given recent reports, 80.2% of surgeons recognized that female surgeons have increased risks of infertility and pregnancy complications. Recurring themes of normalizing pregnancy, improving policies, and creating a culture change were expressed. CONCLUSIONS: In this national survey, although there appears to be positive perceptions of pregnancy in surgical training amongst those surveyed, there is acknowledged necessity of further normalizing pregnancy and improving policies to better support pregnant residents. These data provide further evidence that though perceptions may be improving, changes are still needed to better support pregnancy during training.

The Open Abdomen After Intra-abdominal Contamination in Emergency General Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Delayed fascial closure (DFC) is an increasingly utilized technique in emergency general surgery (EGS), despite a lack of data regarding its benefits. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of DFC versus immediate fascial closure (IFC) in EGS patients with intra-abdominal contamination. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using the 2013-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Adult EGS patients who underwent an exploratory laparotomy with intra-abdominal contamination [wound classification III (contaminated) or IV (dirty)] were included. Patients with agreed upon indications for DFC were excluded. A propensity-matched analysis was performed. The primary outcome was 30-d mortality. RESULTS: We identified 36,974 eligible patients. 16.8% underwent DFC, of which 51.7% were female, and the median age was 64 y. After matching, there were 6213 pairs. DFC was associated with a higher risk of mortality (15.8% versus 14.2%, P = 0.016), pneumonia (11.7% versus 10.1%, P = 0.007), pulmonary embolism (1.9% versus 1.6%, P = 0.03), and longer hospital stay (11 versus 10 d, P < 0.001). No significant differences in postoperative sepsis and deep surgical site infection rates between the two groups were observed. Subgroup analyses by preoperative diagnosis (diverticulitis, perforation, and undifferentiated sepsis) showed that DFC was associated with longer hospital stay in all subgroups, with a higher mortality rate in patients with diverticulitis (8.1% versus 6.1%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of intra-abdominal contamination, DFC is associated with longer hospital stay and higher rates of mortality and morbidity. DFC was not associated with decreased risk of infectious complications. Further studies are needed to clearly define the indications of DFC.

General Surgery Resident Participation in a Mandatory Wellness Program: Six Years Later.

INTRODUCTION: Following the approval of a resident-created physician wellness program in 2016, an initial survey demonstrated majority support for the implementation of a mandatory curriculum. The purpose of this study is to survey surgical residents about the wellness curriculum six years after implementation and re-evaluate preference for mandatory participation. METHODS: In 2016, the CORE7 Wellness Program didactic sessions were integrated into the general surgery resident education curriculum. A comparison between 2016 and 2022 resident survey results was done to examine overall approval and resident experience. RESULTS: A total of 25 general surgery residents responded to the 2022 survey which equaled to a response rate of 67.5% compared to a response rate of 87.1% in 2016. Similar to the results in 2016, there was unanimous support (100%, n = 25) in favor of the ongoing development of a general surgery wellness program. The majority of residents (88% versus 85.2% in 2016) preferred quarterly "wellness half-days" remain a mandatory component of the program. In 2016, most of the residents (50%) stated that the reason for mandatory preference for wellness half-days was ease of explanation to faculty. In 2022, the reason changed to a combination of reasons with most residents (59%) selecting ease of explanation to attendings, feeling too guilty otherwise to leave the shift, and forcing the resident to think about self-care. Complaints about taking a wellness half-day from other team members increased from 29% in 2016 to 48% in 2022. CONCLUSIONS: Six years after implementation, there is unanimous support for the mandatory components of a general surgery residency wellness curriculum. Increased perceived complaints from faculty and staff about resident wellness present an opportunity for improvement.

The Gender Gap in Surgical Literature: Are We Making Progress?

INTRODUCTION: The percentage of women in surgical leadership roles is not commensurate with percent of women in field of surgery. Citation indexes are used as proxy for scholarly impact and may serve as an indicator of women's progress in academic surgery. We aimed to evaluate gender disparities in authorship of surgery manuscripts in high-impact journals. METHODS: In this bibliometric analysis of original research articles from four high-impact surgical journals from 2008 to 2010 (period A) and 2018-2020 (period B), the gender of primary and senior authors was assigned by Genderize.io. Number of citations per article was identified via Web of Science. Number of citations by gender of authors was compared across time periods. RESULTS: Of the 3575 articles (Period A = 1915; Period B = 1660), 962 (26.9%) had women as primary authors and 590 (17.2%) as senior authors. Over time, significant increases in women primary and senior authorship were noted from 22.8% to 31.7% (P < 0.001) and 13.9% (254/11,915) to 21% (336/1660), respectively (P < 0.001). Articles written with women primary authors had fewer median (interquartile range) citations than those by men as primary author in period A (39 [17-69.5] versus 42 [20.0-84.0]; P = 0.005). Gender parity was noted in period B (9 [4-19] versus 9 [4-20] citations; P = 0.307). In period A, articles written by women as both primary and senior authors had approximately 25% fewer median citations compared with those by men (34 [17-62] versus 44 [21-86]); P < 0.011), and this reached parity in period B (9 [4-20] versus 9 [4-21]); P < 0.658). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, gender authorship and citations parity are improving in high-impact surgery journals.

Identifying Factors Associated With Code Status Changes After Emergency General Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical emergencies are time sensitive. Identifying patients who may benefit from preoperative goals of care discussions is critical to ensuring that operative intervention aligns with the patient's values. We sought to identify patient factors associated with acute changes in a patient's goals using code status change (CSC) as proxy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of single-institution data for patients undergoing urgent laparotomy was performed. Patients were stratified based on whether a postoperative CSC occurred. Parametric, nonparametric, and regression analyses were used to identify variables associated with CSC. RESULTS: Of 484 patients, 13.8% (n = 67) had a postoperative CSC. Patients with postoperative CSC were older (65 versus 60 years, P < 0.001). Odds of CSC were significantly higher in patients who were transferred between facilities (odds ratio [OR] 2.1), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3-4: OR 3.9, 5+: OR 6.8), and had a higher quick sequential organ failure assessment score (2: OR 5.0; 3: OR 38.7). Patients with anemia (OR 1.9) and active cancer (OR 3.0) had higher odds of CSC. CONCLUSIONS: Timely intervention in emergency general surgery may result in high-risk interventions and subsequent complications that do not align with a patient's goals and values. Our analysis identified a subset of patients who undergo surgery and have a postoperative CSC leading to transition to comfort-focused care. In these patients, a pause in clinical momentum may help ensure operative intervention remains goal concordant.

A National Analysis of Racial and Sex Disparities Among Interhospital Transfers for Emergency General Surgery Patients and Associated Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Studies focusing on Emergency General Surgery (EGS) and Interhospital Transfer (IHT) and the association of race and sex and morbidity and mortality are yet to be conducted. We aim to investigate the association of race and sex and outcomes among IHT patients who underwent emergency general surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult patients who were transferred prior to EGS procedures using the National Surgery Quality Improvement Project from 2014 to 2020. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare outcomes (readmission, major and minor postoperative complications, and reoperation) between interhospital transfer and direct admit patients and to investigate the association of race and sex for adverse outcomes for all EGS procedures. A secondary analysis was performed for each individual EGS procedure. RESULTS: Compared to patients transferred directly from home, IHT patients (n = 28,517) had higher odds of readmission [odds ratio (OR): 1.004, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.002-1.006), P < 0.001], major complication [adjusted OR: 1.119, 95% CI (1.117-1.121), P < 0.001), minor complication [OR: 1.078, 95% CI (1.075-1.080), P < 0.001], and reoperation [OR: 1.014, 95% CI (1.013-1.015), P < 0.001]. In all EGS procedures, Black patients had greater odds of minor complication [OR 1.041, 95% CI (1.023-1.060), P < 0.001], Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander patients had greater odds of readmission [OR 1.081, 95% CI (1.008-1.160), P = 0.030], while Asian and Hispanic patients had lower odds of adverse outcome, and female patients had greater odds of minor complication [OR 1.017, 95% CI (1.008-1.027), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure-specific racial and sex-related disparities exist in emergency general surgery patients who underwent interhospital transfer. Specific interventions should be implemented to address these disparities to improve the safety of emergency procedures.

Using the Social Vulnerability Index to Analyze Statewide Health Disparities in Cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Addressing the effects of social determinants of health in surgery has become a national priority. We evaluated the utility of the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) in determining the likelihood of receiving cholecystectomy for cholecystitis in Texas. METHODS: A retrospective study of adults with cholecystitis in the Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Public Use Data File and Texas Outpatient Surgical and Radiological Procedure Data Public Use Data File from 2016 to 2019. Patients were stratified into SVI quartiles, with the lowest quartile as low vulnerability, the middle two as average vulnerability, and the highest as high vulnerability. The relative risk (RR) of undergoing surgery was calculated using average vulnerability as the reference category and subgroup sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: A total of 67,548 cases were assessed, of which 48,603 (72.0%) had surgery. Compared with the average SVI groups, the low vulnerability groups were 21% more likely to undergo cholecystectomy (RR = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.24), whereas the high vulnerability groups were 9% less likely to undergo cholecystectomy (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.93). The adjusted model showed similar results (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.06 and RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, for low and high vulnerability groups, respectively). These results remained significant after stratifying for age, sex, ethnicity, and insurance status. However, the differences between low, average, and high vulnerability groups diminished in rural settings, with lower surgery rates in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with higher SVI were less likely to receive an elective cholecystectomy. SVI is an effective method of identifying social determinants impacting access to and receipt of surgical care.

The Intersection of Family Planning and Perception of Career Advancement in General Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Women in surgery face unique challenges, particularly as it relates to family planning, parental leave, infant feeding, and career advancement. This study highlights disparities in present day general surgery training to tackle longstanding gender inequities. METHODS: An open, anonymous online survey was distributed to Canadian residents, fellows, and practicing general surgeons through the Canadian Association of General Surgeons e-mail list from November 2021-March 2022. Data were analyzed descriptively and chi-square tests were performed to examine categorical outcomes across gender. RESULTS: A total of 89 general surgery respondents (13.8% response rate) completed the survey (22 cisgender men; 65 cisgender women). Twenty six percent of participants had accessed fertility services or used assistive reproductive technologies. Of the participants with children, 36.4% of men and 100.0% of women took at least one parental leave during residency or clinical practice. A greater proportion of women compared to men agreed that their training/practice influenced their decision to have children (P = 0.002) and when to have children (P < 0.001). Similarly, a greater proportion of women indicated they had concerns about future family planning (P = 0.008), future fertility (P = 0.002), and future parental leave (P = 0.026). Fifty nine percent of women and zero men agreed that taking parental leave impacted their career advancement (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Women surgeons and surgical trainees continue to face challenges with respect to family planning, parental leave, infant feeding, and career advancement. Further research is needed to explore the experiences of women surgeons. By providing surgeons with the support required to achieve their family planning goals, surgeons can accomplish their family and career goals with less conflict.

Evaluation of geographic variations in appendicectomy outcomes within Western Australia assessing the impact of surgical wait times and rate of negative appendicectomies in both urban and rural locations statewide.

PURPOSE: Surgery wait times after diagnosis of appendicitis are an important factor influencing the success of a patient's treatment. The proposed study will be a quantitative multicenter retrospective cohort design with the primary aim of assessing the difference between appendicectomy wait times between rural and urban hospitals in Western Australia and the effect of this on operative outcomes. Selected outcome measures will be examined by time from initial presentation at an emergency department to the patient being diagnosed and then time of diagnosis to surgery being performed. The secondary aim is to compare rates of negative appendicectomies between hospitals. METHODS: Appendicectomy patients will be identified from operating room register by medical student data collectors; then, each respective hospital's emergency room data collection will subsequently be accessed to complete case report forms based on demographics and clinical findings, pre-operative investigations, and management and follow-up. Case report forms with > 95% completeness will be accepted for pooled analysis. The expected duration of retrospective data collection will be 8 months. This study RGS6483 has received HREC approval by the Royal Perth Hospital HREC Ethics Committee, with a waiver of consent obtained and the HREC was notified of amendments to the protocol made on April 21, 2024. Dissemination of results. Data will be collected and stored online through a secure server running the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) web application. No patient-identifiable data will be entered into the system. Results will subsequently be shared via scientific journal publication and presentation at relevant meetings.

Efficiency of hospitals in COVID-19 era: a case study of an affected country.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of human life and society and has damaged the global economy. Health systems and hospitals were not exempted from this situation. The performance of hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic was affected by policies related to the pandemic and other factors. This study aimed to investigate hospital performance indicators such as admissions and revenue. METHODS: The medical records of patients with selected orthopedic and general surgical diseases were studied in two government hospitals in the capital city of Urmia in the second quarter of 2019, with the same period in 2020. Data were extracted based on the number of medical records, including length of stay, hospitalization type, sex, age, insurance, number of deaths, and readmissions from the medical records department. Payment amounts were collected from the revenue department and Hospital Information System. Two performance indicators, two result indicators, and two control indicators were used. Mean disease-specific revenue, total revenue, length of stay, and bed occupancy rate were calculated for both periods. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 16) and the Mann-Whitney statistical test. RESULTS: 2140 cases were studied in the two disease groups. An increase was observed in the number of hospitalizations and average length of stay during the pandemic. The mean disease-specific revenue in the quarter of 2020 was higher than in 2019. However, total revenue decreased, and the difference in the mean of total revenue was significant for the two years (P = 0.00) in teaching center. The number of readmissions remained unchanged throughout in the pandemic. The number of deaths due to general surgery diseases in 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 was associated with a relative increase. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the slope of health care costs. The analysis of the studied variables as performance, result, and control indicators showed that hospitalization rate, bed occupancy rate, and total revenue followed a similar and decreasing pattern in the selected hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hospitals should adopt appropriate strategies so that, in conditions identical to the COVID-19 pandemic, their performance is accompanied by proper management of resources, efficiency, and minimal reduction in revenue.

The provision of general surgery in rural Australia: a narrative review.

Rural surgery is most commonly provided by general surgeons to the 29% of people (7 million) living in rural Australia. The provision of rural general surgery to enable equitable and safe surgical care for rural Australians is a multifaceted issue concerning recruitment, training, retention, surgical procedures and surgical outcomes. Sustaining the rural general surgical workforce will be dependent upon growing an increased number of resident rural general surgeons, as well as changed models of care, with a need for ongoing review to track the outcomes of these changes. To increase recruitment, rural general surgical training must improve to be less stressful for trainees and to be incorporated alongside a rural-facing generalist curriculum. Rural general surgical outcomes (excluding some oncology conditions) achieve comparable results to metropolitan centres. Access to, and outcomes of, surgical oncology services continues to be inequitable for rural Australians and should be a major focus for improved service delivery.

Improving the management and outcomes of complex non-pedunculated colorectal polyps at a regional hospital in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer arises from precancerous lesions, primarily adenomatous and serrated polyps. Some polyps pose significant technical endoscopic challenges due to their size, location, and/or morphology. A standardized protocol for documentation and management of these polyps can optimize clinical outcomes. METHODS: A Quality Improvement project compared patients with a complex polyp (non-pedunculated, > 2 cm), for 12 months prior and 12 months after protocol introduction. Documentation and polyp management details were compared pre- and post-implementation using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: 69 patients were diagnosed with complex polyps prior to the protocol introduction and 72 after. 79% (112/141) of patients underwent endoscopic mucosal resections (EMR) locally, and 14.9% (21/141) underwent surgery locally. After protocol introduction, there was significant improvement in documentation of suspicious appearing polyps (21.7% to 47.2%, P = 0.001), luminal circumference (14.5% to 34.7%, P = 0.005), and management plans (87.0% to 97.2%, P = 0.023); other elements of documentation were similar. The number of patients reviewed at multidisciplinary conference (MDC) increased from 1 to 61% (P < 0.005). Patients rebooked in a 1 h endoscopy time slot increased from 19 to 58% (P < 0.005), as did specific consent for EMR from 22 to 57% (P < 0.005). Among patients with polyps 3 cm or greater (23 pre, 36 post), MDC review increased from 4 to 67% (P < 0.005), primary polypectomy decreased from 72 to 23% (P = 0.001), patients rebooked in a double endoscopy slot increased from 33 to 75% (P = 0.005), and specific consent increased from 39 to 75% (P = 0.014). There were less polyp recurrences (12/42 pre and 1/50 post) among the post-protocol cohort (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a formalized protocol for complex polyp adjudication and management has led to improved documentation, multidisciplinary discussion, and optimal complex polyp management with dedicated time for EMR, particularly for polyps over 3 cm. There is room for improvement, and this can be approached in a collaborative manner.

Establishment of a 24/7 robotic acute care surgery program at a large academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: For many years, robotic surgery has been an option for various elective surgical procedures. Though robotic surgery has not traditionally been the first choice for acute surgical patients, recent work has shown promise in broader applications. However, there are limited data regarding how to establish an institutional robotics program for higher acuity patients. This project aimed to map a pathway for the creation of an acute care surgery robotic program at a large academic medical center. METHODS: Various stakeholders were gathered jointly with our surgical faculty: anesthesia, operating room leadership, surgical technologists, circulating nurses, Central Sterile Supply, and Intuitive Surgical Inc. representatives. Staff underwent robotics training, and surgical technologists were trained as bedside first assistants. Nontraditional robotic operating rooms were allocated for coordinated placement of appropriate cases, and pre-made case carts were arranged with staff to be available at all hours. A workflow was created between surgical faculty and staff to streamline add-on robotic cases to the daily schedule. RESULTS: Six faculty and two fellows are now credentialed in robotics surgery, and additional surgeons are undergoing training. Numerous staff have completed training to perform operative assistant duties. The operating capacity of robotic acute care surgeries has more than doubled in just one year, from 77 to 172 cases between 2022 and 2023, respectively. Two add-on cases can be accommodated per day. Select patients are being offered robotic surgeries in the acute surgical setting, and ongoing efforts are being made to create guidelines for which patients would best benefit from robotic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Launching a successful robotic surgery program requires a coordinated, multidisciplinary effort to ensure seamless integration into daily operations. Additional assistance from outside technology representatives can help to ensure comfort with procedures. Further studies are needed to determine the acute patient population that may benefit most from robotic surgery.

Race and sex diversity in Canadian academic surgical societies.

BACKGROUND: It is vital for national professional surgical societies to embrace diversity, inclusion, and equity. This study examines race and sex diversity in two Canadian surgical societies. METHODS: Websites of the Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgeons (CSCS) and the Canadian Association of General Surgeons (CAGS) and previous programs of their annual meetings were reviewed. Leadership positions, conference speakers, and award winners were categorized by race and sex. RESULTS: White males made up the largest category of Cardiac Surgery meeting speakers (73/142 [51%]), CAGS committee members (89/198 [45%]), CAGS past presidents (38/43 [88%]), and General Surgery meeting speakers (841/1472 [57%]). Of the 17 members that made up the CSCS board of directors and officers, 8 were White males (47%), 5 were BIPOC males (29%), 3 were White females (18%), and 1 was a BIPOC female (6%). Of the 42 members of the CAGS board of directors and advisory committee, 16 were White males (38%), 5 were BIPOC males (12%), 17 were White females (40%), and 4 were BIPOC females (10%). CONCLUSIONS: BIPOC individuals and females are underrepresented in both societies compared to White males. However, in CAGS, improvements in representation can be seen in recent years. It is important that both of these organizations continue to embrace diversity.

Sex differences in altmetric attention scores and traditional impact metrics of top-cited general surgery literature: Cracks in the ceiling?

BACKGROUND: Sex disparities have previously been identified in surgical academia. This study examines sex differences in the top-cited contemporary general surgery articles and compares Altimetric Attention Score (AAS) and other impact metrics between male and female corresponding authors (CAs). METHODS: We conducted a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles published between 2019 and 2021 in each of the top 10 general surgery journals based on the 2021 Journal Impact Factor. Impact metrics included AAS, citation count, and H-index of the CA. We used multivariable regression analyses to investigate whether the sex of the CA or first author (FA) was independently associated with AAS and citation count. RESULTS: Among 1000 articles, 23.1% had female CAs and 27.4% female FAs. Female CA articles had higher AAS (13.0 [2.0-63.0] vs. 8.0 [1.0-28.5]; p < 0.001) and lower H-indices (24.0 [11.0-45.0] vs. 31.0 [17.0-50.0]; p = 0.015). Although median citation count did not differ by CA sex, articles with Level 1 evidence and a female CA were cited more often (35.5 [24.0-85.0] vs. 25.0 [16.0 vs. 46.0]; p < 0.05). In multivariable regression, female CA articles had higher AAS (OR: 1.002 [95% CI: 1.001-1.004]) and lower H-index (OR: 0.987 [95% CI: 0.977-0.997]). CONCLUSION: Despite having similar citation counts, articles authored by female CAs exhibit higher AAS scores compared to those authored by their male counterparts. While it is heartening that research authored by female surgeons achieves significant visibility, it remains to be understood how this translates into academic impact and scholarly recognition.