RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rickettsial disease has been commonly associated with retinitis, retinal vasculitis, and optic nerve involvement, but the development of retinal neovascularization has been very rarely reported. We herein describe a case of rickettsial retinitis complicated with the development of sea-fan retinal neovascularization documented with multimodal imaging, including fundus photography, SS-OCT, fluorescein angiography, and SS-OCT angiography. CASE PRESENTATION: A 26-year-old female with a history of fever one week earlier presented with sudden decreased vision in the left eye. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/2000 and the patient was diagnosed with rickettsial retinitis along the superotemporal retinal vascular arcade associated with serous retinal detachment and retinal hard exudates. The indirect immunofluorescence test was positive for Rickettsia conorii, and the patient was treated with oral doxycycline (200 mg/day) and oral prednisone (0.75 mg/kg/day, with gradual tapering). Four weeks after presentation, the retinal infiltrate and associated serous retinal detachment had resolved, but retinal hard exudates had increased. A large sea-fan preretinal fibrovascular neovascularization became apparent along the superotemporal retinal vascular arcade, but there was no associated retinal ischemia on fluorescein angiography. The patient received an adjunctive single intravitreal injection of 1.25 bevacizumab. Sequential follow-up examinations showed shrinking of sea-fan retinal neovascularization, a complete resolution of retinal hard exudates, and the development of a self-limited vitreous hemorrhage. On last follow-up, 30 months after intravitreal bevacizumab injection, BCVA was 20/25. CONCLUSION: Patients with rickettsial retinitis may develop a sea-fan retinal neovascularization, with subsequent vitreous hemorrhage, putatively through inflammatory mechanisms. Multimodal imaging including OCT, fluorescein angiography, and OCT-angiography, is highly useful for accurate diagnosis and reliable monitoring of the evolution of retinitis, retinal neovascularization, and other retinal changes. The use of a combination therapy with oral doxycycline and corticosteroids and intravitreal anti-VEGF can improve outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Neovascularización Retiniana , Retinitis , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Neovascularización Retiniana/diagnóstico , Neovascularización Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neovascularización Retiniana/etiología , Retinitis/diagnóstico , Retinitis/microbiología , Retinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Angiografía con Fluoresceína/métodos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Rickettsia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Rickettsia/complicaciones , Infecciones por Rickettsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Rickettsia/microbiología , Rickettsia conorii , Fondo de Ojo , Agudeza Visual , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The cardiovascular (CV) toxicity profiles of traditional cancer therapies such as anthracyclines and radiation therapy are familiar to many cardiologists. With the development and widespread use of additional cancer therapeutics, CV toxicities related to these agents are becoming more common. Cardiovascular specialists are often integrated into the care team for individuals with cancer and knowledge of the CV toxicities of cancer therapeutics has become essential. In this review, we provide a clinically focused summary of the current data regarding CV toxicities of common cancer therapies and identify potential management strategies for the CV specialist.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
The use of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors has revolutionised the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) since the pivotal Phase III studies demonstrated their efficacy more than 10 years ago. The Fight Retinal Blindness! project was developed to track the treatment outcomes of patients with nAMD in real-world practice. Data from this registry have been used to answer several clinically relevant questions related to the treatment of nAMD including the effect of under-treatment, the comparative effectiveness of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents, long-term treatment outcomes, identifying optimal treatment regimens and the rate and outcomes of rare adverse events. Observational studies are a valuable complement to the shortcomings of clinical trials and a combination of data from real-world settings and clinical trials are necessary to provide evidence on how to achieve the best outcomes for individual patients with nAMD.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Degeneración Macular Húmeda , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Ceguera/epidemiología , Ceguera/etiología , Ceguera/prevención & control , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular/epidemiología , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Agudeza Visual , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a predominant malignancy worldwide, being the fourth most common cause of mortality and morbidity. The CRC incidence in adolescents, young adults, and adult populations is increasing every year. In the pathogenesis of CRC, various factors are involved including diet, sedentary life, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, obesity, gut microbiota, diabetes, and genetic mutations. The CRC tumor microenvironment (TME) involves the complex cooperation between tumoral cells with stroma, immune, and endothelial cells. Cytokines and several growth factors (GFs) will sustain CRC cell proliferation, survival, motility, and invasion. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Insulin-like growth factor -1 receptor (IGF-1R), and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor -A (VEGF-A) are overexpressed in various human cancers including CRC. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and all the three major subfamilies of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways may be activated by GFs and will further play key roles in CRC development. The main aim of this review is to present the CRC incidence, risk factors, pathogenesis, and the impact of GFs during its development. Moreover, the article describes the relationship between EGF, IGF, VEGF, GFs inhibitors, PI3K/AKT/mTOR-MAPK signaling pathways, and CRC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/metabolismo , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intercelular/metabolismo , Proteínas Quinasas Activadas por Mitógenos/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/fisiología , Animales , Humanos , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/metabolismo , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/metabolismoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate the main direct health costs, in routine clinical practice, of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients, from hospital perspective, in Spain. METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter, and observational study conducted on five third-level Spanish hospitals, between December 2018 and December 2019. The study included patients who were diagnosed of AMD before December 2018. Direct healthcare costs were obtained from a Spanish database. Study variables included demographic and clinical variables, and resources, such as treatment, diagnostic tests, medical examination, and surgery. Among the 1414 screened AMD patients, 1164 patients were included. In the overall study patients, the total cost was 5,386,511.0, with a mean cost per patient of 4627.6 ± 2383.9. The largest cost items were diagnostic examinations (2.832.902,0) and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGF) treatment (2.038.257,2). Bevacizumab was administered to 325 (27.9%) patients, ranibizumab to 328 (28.2%), and aflibercept to 626 (53.8%); 115 (10.7%) patients received two anti-VEGF treatments, while 90 (7.7%) did not receive any. Over the course of the study, a total of 6,057 anti-VEGF injections were administered, with a mean (95% confidence interval) of 4.8 (4.4-5.2) injections per patient. Regarding safety, 29 patients experience injection-related adverse events, among them 12 patients had cataract and 11 ones elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). The incidence of endophthalmitis was 0.5% (6/1164). CONCLUSIONS: AMD was associated with considerable healthcare costs for regional healthcare systems. Diagnostic examinations, particularly OCT examinations, and anti-VEGF treatment represented the largest cost items.
Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Costo de Enfermedad , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular/epidemiología , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Agudeza VisualRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a treat-and-extend protocol of aflibercept for cystoid macular oedema (CMO) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: Twenty patients with CMO secondary to CRVO were included in this prospective cohort study. After 3 loading 4-weekly injections, treatment intervals were increased by 2 weeks if there was no clinical activity, to a maximum of 12 weeks. If clinical activity recurred or persisted, the interval between injections was shortened by 2 weeks, to a minimum of 4 weeks. Main outcome measures were change in visual acuity and the proportion of patients gaining 15 or more Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters from baseline at 6, 12 and 18 months. RESULTS: Mean BCVA gain from baseline was 19.7 ± 13.8, 22.2 ± 13.9 and 21.9 ± 15.8 ETDRS letters at 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively. Sixty-five percent of patients gained 15 or more ETDRS letters at 6 months, increasing to 70.6% at 12 and 18 months. Patients received 5.0 [4.0 to 6.0], 8.5 [8.0 to 10.3] and 11.0 [9.0 to 12.5] injections by 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The visual outcomes achieved with a treat-and-extend protocol in this study were similar to the pivotal trials of aflibercept for CMO secondary to CRVO, which used monthly and then as-needed protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, registration number ACTRN12615000417583, 01/05/2015.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/etiología , Edema Macular/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/complicaciones , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/diagnóstico , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/fisiopatología , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Until the past decade, therapeutic options for unresectable and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma were limited. Renal cell carcinoma is generally resistant to conventional chemotherapy, and only a small percentage of patients with renal cell carcinoma benefit from cytokine treatment. Since 2005, the advances in target-based therapy and immunotherapy modalities have created a paradigm shift in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Herein, we review the most up-to-date practices and emerging therapies for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and focus on the threrapy caused side-effects and side-effect management. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(38): 1488-1502.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The review presents data of clinical and pharmacogenetic research by Russian and foreign authors conducted within the last three years on the effectiveness of anti-angiogenic treatment against wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Scientific results on the association between angiogenesis-related gene polymorphisms responsible for predisposition to AMD on the one hand and a positive response to anti-VEGF therapy on the other are presented. Particular attention is paid to the main regulator of angiogenesis - the VEGF-A gene.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Degeneración Macular , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/clasificación , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/farmacología , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular/genética , Neovascularización Patológica/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de FarmacogenómicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Studies suggest nerve growth factor inhibitors (NGFi) relieve pain but may accelerate disease progression in some patients with osteoarthritis (OA). We sought cost and toxicity thresholds that would make NGFi a cost-effective treatment for moderate-to-severe knee OA. DESIGN: We used the Osteoarthritis Policy (OAPol) model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of NGFi compared to standard of care (SOC) in OA, using Tanezumab as an example. Efficacy and rates of accelerated OA progression were based on published studies. We varied the price/dose from $200 to $1000. We considered self-administered subcutaneous (SC) injections (no administration cost) vs provider-administered intravenous (IV) infusion ($69-$433/dose). Strategies were defined as cost-effective if their incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was less than $100,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). In sensitivity analyses we varied efficacy, toxicity, and costs. RESULTS: SOC in patients with high levels of pain led to an average discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 11.15 QALYs, a lifetime risk of total knee replacement surgery (TKR) of 74%, and cumulative discounted direct medical costs of $148,700. Adding Tanezumab increased QALYs to 11.42, reduced primary TKR utilization to 63%, and increased costs to between $155,400 and $199,500. In the base-case analysis, Tanezumab at $600/dose was cost-effective when delivered outside of a hospital. At $1000/dose, Tanezumab was not cost-effective in all but the most optimistic scenario. Only at rates of accelerated OA progression of 10% or more (10-fold higher than reported values) did Tanezumab decrease QALYs and fail to represent a viable option. CONCLUSIONS: At $100,000/QALY, Tanezumab would be cost effective if priced ≤$400/dose in all settings except IV hospital delivery.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factor de Crecimiento Nervioso/antagonistas & inhibidores , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Econométricos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/economía , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Autoadministración/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This review provides a perspective on published and ongoing clinical trials of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGF agents) combined with laser therapy for diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Although there was little short-term benefit in combining prompt macular laser with anti-VEGF therapy for centre-involving DMO in the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCRnet) Protocol I study, deferred macular laser was still required in over 40% of study eyes in DRCRnet Protocol T. Macular laser was applied in more than 30% of eyes with centre-involving DMO receiving ranibizumab in the RISE and RIDE studies. For non centre-involving DMO the evidence-base still supports use of focal macular laser alone, although clinicians should be cautious about applying laser too close to the foveal avascular zone with the availability of pharmacotherapy. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing whether selectively targeting areas of peripheral retinal ischaemia with laser reduces the number of anti-VEGF injections to stabilise DMO and whether combining macular micropulse laser with anti-VEGF therapy is beneficial in DMO.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Retinopatía Diabética/terapia , Terapia por Láser , Edema Macular/terapia , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Terapia Combinada , HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Cetuximab and panitumumab are monoclonal antibodies that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Most patients develop a papulopustular rash, which may predict tumor response. We studied whether the other adverse cutaneous effects associated with these monoclonal antibodies are also clinical predictors of response. We also reviewed publications describing approaches to treating the papulopustular rash since no evidence-based guidelines have yet been published. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 116 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving anti-EGRF therapy with cetuximab or panitumumab at Hospital Universitario Donostia. RESULTS: In total, 81.9% of the patients developed a papulopustular rash. Patients who received the most cycles of treatment with the EGFR inhibitor were at the highest risk of developing the rash, and these patients also had the most severe rash reactions (P=.03). All of the patients who exhibited a complete tumor response had the rash, and the incidence of rash was lower in patients with poor tumor response (P=.03). We also observed an association between tumor response and xerosis (53.4% of the patients who developed xerosis also exhibited tumor response, P=.002). The papulopustular rash was managed according to an algorithm developed by our department. CONCLUSIONS: Severe papulopustular rash and xerosis may be clinical predictors of good response to anti-EGFR therapy. Patients who develop a papulopustular rash should be treated promptly because suboptimal treatment of this and other adverse effects can lead to delays in taking the prescribed anti-EGFR dose or to interruption of therapy.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cutáneas Papuloescamosas/inducido químicamente , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Anciano , Algoritmos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Antipruriginosos/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Cetuximab/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas de Neoplasias/antagonistas & inhibidores , Panitumumab , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Cutáneas Papuloescamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Purpose: Controversy exists regarding the systemic safety of intravitreal VEGF inhibitors in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). We aimed to investigate the potential impact of VEGF inhibitor treatment on the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients with nAMD. Design: A nationwide register-based cohort study with 16 years follow-up. Participants: Patients with nAMD exposed with VEGF inhibitors (n = 37 733) and unexposed individuals without nAMD (n = 1 897 073) aged ≥ 65 years residing in Denmark between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2022. Methods: Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to assess the effect of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor treatment on all-cause mortality and incident CVD. Main Outcome Measures: In a predefined analysis plan we defined primary outcomes as hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality and a composite CVD endpoint in patients with nAMD treated with VEGF inhibitors compared with individuals without nAMD. The secondary outcomes encompassed analyses that explored the impact of the number of doses and the association between exposure and outcome over a specific time period. Results: Overall, 63.7% of patients with nAMD were women with an average age of 69.9 years (interquartile range 65.0-76.0 years). Patients exposed to VEGF inhibitors demonstrated a reduced risk of all-cause mortality compared with individuals without nAMD (HR, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.81), and an increased risk of composite CVD (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07). The decreased risk of all-cause mortality persisted, but there was no significant association between VEGF inhibitor treatment and CVD when patients with nAMD were grouped by the number of doses or considered exposed within 60 days postinjection. Conclusions: Our study revealed a decreased risk of all-cause mortality and a 4% increased risk of CVD among patients with nAMD exposed with VEGF inhibitors. The decreased risk of mortality is unlikely to be directly pathophysiologically related to VEGF inhibitor treatment. Instead, we speculate that patients undergoing VEGF inhibitor treatment are, on average, individuals in good health with adequate personal resources. Therefore, they also have a higher likelihood of overall survival. These findings strongly support the safety of VEGF inhibitor treatment in terms of all-cause mortality and CVD among patients with nAMD. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEXI) has been placed as an effective option to treat diabetic macular edema (DME). However, there is no consensus on the best time to introduce it. We conducted a study to evaluate anatomical and functional behavior after the first DEXI according to previous treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective, real-world study between 2013 and 2020 investigated changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT at months 2 and 6 after the first DEXI in DME. Patients were divided into naive, early switch (≤3 anti-VEGF injections), or late switch (>3 anti-VEGF injections) groups. RESULTS: Among 112 consecutive eyes, mean BCVA and CMT improved significantly in all groups at month 2, with no difference between them. However, this improvement was not maintained at 6 months. The Naíve group presented better BCVA all over the study period. The previously treated groups, which started with worse initial visual acuity, showed more visual gain without reaching the BCVA of the naive group. CMT performance was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was similar anatomical and functional behavior in all groups. Poorer visual acuity at baseline was associated with worse functional outcome despite good anatomic response.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatía Diabética , Edema Macular , Humanos , Dexametasona , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Implantes de Medicamentos/uso terapéutico , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Protocolos Clínicos , Glucocorticoides , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de la AngiogénesisRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The global prevalence of colorectal cancer highlights the need to enhance treatment strategies for improved patient outcomes. The pivotal role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in regulating cellular processes for this disease pinpoints its value as a therapeutic target, despite the emergence of resistance mechanisms over time. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR inhibitors in molecularly-selected patients based on molecular characteristics (notably BRAF V600E and KRAS G12C) including combination approaches targeting different points in in the signaling pathway, as well as strategies such as EGFR inhibitor rechallenge. The role of HER2 inhibitors and emerging approaches such as bispecific antibodies are also reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Recently, inhibitors targeting the KRAS G12C variant have emerged, albeit with modest monotherapy activity compared to other tumor types, emphasizing the influence of histologic origins on the EGFR signaling pathway. Integration of EGFR inhibitors into precision medicine has facilitated tailored therapies addressing resistance mechanisms. Patient selection for EGFR inhibitor rechallenge guided by ctDNA findings is crucial, with ongoing investigations exploring novel combinations to enhance EGFR blockade, highlighting the transformative potential of precision medicine in shaping the future of mCRC treatment toward personalized and targeted approaches.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Receptores ErbB , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Medicina de Precisión , Transducción de Señal , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores ErbB/genética , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Selección de Paciente , Animales , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
Excessive fibrosis and resultant poor control of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduce the efficacy of glaucoma surgeries. Historically, corticosteroids and anti-fibrotic agents, such as mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have been used to mitigate post-surgical fibrosis, but these have unpredictable outcomes. Therefore, there is a need to develop novel treatments which provide increased effectiveness and specificity. This review aims to provide insight into the pathophysiology behind wound healing in glaucoma surgery, as well as the current and promising future wound healing agents that are less toxic and may provide better IOP control.
RESUMEN
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) contributes to angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. The occurrence and progression of tumors are accompanied by angiogenesis. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFI) have been used in anti-tumor treatment. However, aortic dissection (AD) is one of the VEGFI-associated adverse reactions with cute onset, rapid progression, and high case fatality rate. We collected case reports of VEGFI related to aortic dissection in PubMed and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from inception to 28 April 2022. Seventeen case reports were selected. The medication included sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, axitinib, apatinib, anlotinib, bevacizumab, and ramucirumab. This review discusses the pathology, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment of AD. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors are related to aortic dissection. Although current literature lacks clear statistical evidence on the population, we offer points to encourage further confirmation of the best methods of care for these patients.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Intravitreal treatment with VEGF inhibitors has proven safe in clinical trials, but often on selected patient groups and without statistical power to investigate rare safety events. Data on anti-VEGF treatment in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) are sparsely represented, and studies providing population-based, long-term follow-up are needed to assess the risks in routine clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the association between treatment with anti-VEGF and the risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality in patients with RVO, and whether this association was affected by selected risk factors. DESIGN: A cohort study from January 2012 to December 2018 using Danish nationwide registries linked on an individual level. SUBJECTS: Patients with RVO (n = 7235), exposed (n = 3508), and unexposed (n = 3727) to anti-VEGF, aged ≥ 40 years, alive, and living in Denmark. METHODS: Cox proportional hazards analysis evaluating the effect of intravitreal VEGF inhibitory treatment on incident CVD and all-cause mortality. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A predefined analysis plan specified primary outcomes as hazard ratios (HRs) of a composite CVD endpoint and all-cause mortality in patients treated with anti-VEGF compared with untreated. Secondary outcomes included cumulative dose analysis, HRs on subgroups of CVD, and stratified analyses evaluating the effect of sex, age, diabetes, intensive treatment, and preexisting CVD on the HRs. RESULTS: We found no increased risk of composite CVD (HR, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.29) or all-cause mortality (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.00) in patients with RVO treated with anti-VEGF. In the secondary analyses, we found no dose-response relationship. We found an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.02-2.71), but no increased risks in remaining subgroups of CVD. We found no increased risk associated with selected predisposing risk factors, and no increased risk in patients with preexisting CVD. CONCLUSION: Treatment with anti-VEGF in patients with RVO is safe, when evaluated in a nationwide, population-based setting. An increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage might be present, but cannot be reliably quantified and should be further elucidated by larger population-based studies including all indications for anti-VEGF treatment. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Asunto(s)
Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana , Humanos , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/complicaciones , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/diagnóstico , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Riesgo , Hemorragias Intracraneales/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While cancer is a risk factor for developing thromboembolism, so is the use of molecularly targeted therapies. This study aimed to determine whether thromboembolism incidence differed between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor use in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer, and to compare the risk of thromboembolism caused by cancer and the use of molecular targeted therapy drugs. MAIN BODY: We retrospectively evaluated patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer who were treated with a cytotoxic anticancer drug and a VEGF or EGFR inhibitor combination between April 2016 and October 2021. Patients were compared in terms of the regimen administered, thromboembolism occurrence during the first-line treatment period, patient background, and clinical laboratory values. Of the 179 included patients, 12 of 134 (8.9%) in the VEGF-inhibitor group and 8 of 45 (17.8%) in the EGFR-inhibitor group developed thromboembolism, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.11). There was no significant difference in time to thromboembolism between patients in the VEGF- inhibitor group and patients in the EGFR-inhibitor group (P = 0.206). The cutoff value determined by a receiver operating characteristic analysis for the occurrence of thromboembolism was one point. Multivariate analysis using the occurrence of thromboembolism as the response variable identified at least one risk factor for thromboembolism (odds ratio = 4.17, P = 0.006, 95% confidence interval = 1.51-11.50). Molecular targeted therapies were not identified as a risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Although the small sample size, there was no difference in the incidence of thromboembolism between the two molecular-targeted therapies in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Our results suggest that risk factors for thromboembolism may be more strongly influenced by cancer itself than by the use of molecularly targeted therapies.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Severe pulmonary hemorrhage can occur in patients treated with thoracic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFis). There is limited understanding of which patients are at risk for toxicity with the combination of thoracic SABR and VEGFis or how the risk differs over either therapy alone. METHODS: We evaluated a prospectively maintained cohort of 690 patients with 818 pulmonary tumors treated with highly conformal SABR. Rates of any-grade and grade 3 plus (G3+) pulmonary hemorrhage were compared between patients treated with or without VEGFi therapy across tumor locations. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with SABR plus VEGFi and a propensity-matched cohort of those treated with VEGFi therapy alone. RESULTS: Treatment with VEGFi plus SABR was associated with higher rates of G3+ pulmonary hemorrhage compared with those treated with SABR alone for the overall cohort (3-y incidence: 7.9% versus 0.6%, p < 0.01) and those with central tumors (19.1% versus 3.3%, p = 0.04). When further subdivided, there were significantly higher toxicity rates with VEGFi for the ultracentral (9.0% versus 45.0%, p = 0.044), but not central nonabutting tumors (0.0% versus 1.3%, p = 0.69). There was an increased incidence of G3+ hemorrhage in patients treated with VEGFi plus SABR compared with VEGFi alone (9.6% versus 1.3%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of VEGFi and SABR was associated with an increased risk of high-grade pulmonary hemorrhage over either therapy alone. Low rates of toxicity were observed when excluding patients with SABR to ultracentral tumors and applying highly conformal SABR techniques.