The effect of the number of hepatic inflow occlusion times on the prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It has been previously reported that inflow occlusion does not affect postoperative outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. However, for patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma(rHCC), the effect of hepatic inflow occlusion and the number of occlusion times on the prognosis is unknown. METHODS: 203 patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in this study. They were first divided into the non-hepatic inflow occlusion (non-HIO) group and the hepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) group. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the recurrence-free survival and overall survival between the two groups. Patients in the HIO group were further divided into one-time HIO and two times HIO groups. KM method was also used to compare the two groups. Finally, independent risk factors affecting RFS and OS were determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULT: In the non-HIO group, 1-,3- and 5-year OS rates were 67.0%, 41.0%, and 22.0%respectively, and RFS rates were 45.0%, 31.0%, and 20.0% respectively; In the one-HIO group, the 1-,3-, and 5-year OS rates were 55.1%, 32.1%, and 19.2% respectively, and RFS rates were 33.3%, 16.7%, and 7.7% respectively; In the two-HIO group, 1-,3-, and 5-year OS rates were 24.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively, and RFS rates were 8.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% respectively. By Cox regression analysis, HIO was an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis in rHCC patients. CONCLUSION: One time hepatic inflow occlusion did not affect postoperative OS, but negatively affected the RFS of rHCC patients; two times hepatic inflow occlusion negatively affected the postoperative OS and RFS in patients with rHCC.

A novel very simple laparoscopic hepatic inflow occlusion apparatus for laparoscopic liver surgery.

BACKGROUND: Control of bleeding is extremely important for laparoscopic liver resection. We introduce a new and operationally simple laparoscopic hepatic inflow occlusion apparatus (LHIOA) and its successful application in laparoscopic surgery for patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: The self-designed LHIOA was constructed using a tracheal catheter (7.5#) and infusion set. The tracheal catheter and infusion set were trimmed to 30 and 70 cm, to serve as an occlusion tube and occlusion tape, respectively. After establishment of pneumoperitoneum, the occlusion tape was inserted to encircle the hepatoduodenal ligament. The occlusion tube was then introduced and the ends of the occlusion tape were pulled out of it to occlude the hepatic inflow. Under intermittent vascular occlusion with the LHIOA, the liver parenchyma was transected using an ultrasonic scalpel and monopolar electrocoagulation. Outcomes of the application of the LHIOA in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with cirrhosis (LHIOA group, n = 46) were compared with patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy without LHIOA (non-LHIOA group, n = 46), using one-to-one propensity case-matched analysis. RESULTS: The LHIOA effectively occluded the hepatic inflow while showing no damage to the hepatoduodenal ligament. The time required for presetting the LHIOA is 6.8 ± 0.6 min. The conversion rate in the non-LHIOA group was 13.0% while there was no conversion in the occlusion group (P < 0.001). The median blood loss of patients in the LHIOA group (60 ml, range 50-200 ml) was significantly less than that of patients in the non-LHIOA group (250 ml, range 100-800) (P < 0.001). Transfusion was required in 8 patients in the non-LHIOA group while no transfusion was required in the LHIOA group. The median operative time in the LHIOA group (157 min, range 80-217 min) was significantly shorter than that in the non-LHIOA group (204 min, range 105-278 min) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The new LHIOA is effective, safe, and simple. It can significantly reduce conversion rate, blood loss, and operative time. It facilitates laparoscopic liver resection and is recommended for use.

Preserving hepatic artery flow during portal triad blood inflow occlusion reduces the outgrowth of hepatocarcinoma in mice after ischemia-reperfusion.

AIM: To investigate the effect of different hepatic vascular occlusion maneuvers on the growth of hepatocarcinoma after liver ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. METHODS: A mice hepatocarcinoma model was established by portal vein injection of H22 hepatoma cells. After 3 days, the mice underwent sham operation, occlusion of portal triad (OPT), portal vein (OPV), or intermittent clamping (INT) operation. The hepatic I/R injury, pathological changes, hepatic replacement area, proliferative cell nuclear antigen expression, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 activation were assessed 5 days after reperfusion. RESULTS: Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels in the OPV group were significantly lower than those in the OPT and INT groups at 24 h after reperfusion. The hepatic injury of clamped liver lobes in the OPV group, represented by histopathological alterations and myeloperoxidase activity, was much slighter than that in the OPT and INT groups. The values of hepatic replacement area in the sham operation, OPT, OPV, and INT groups were 7.661 2.55%, 35.61 1 4.23%, 9.02 1 3.01%, and 19.95 1 4.10%, respectively. Proliferative cell nuclear antigen expression and ERK1/2 activation of tumor cells were the highest in the OPT group, and the lowest in the OPV and INT groups. CONCLUSION: Preserving hepatic artery flow during portal triad blood inflow occlusion substantially inhibits the outgrowth of hepatocarcinoma via attenuating hepatic I/R injury in a murine liver tumor model. These results suggest a better prevention of hepatic tumor outgrowth after hepatectomy by using the selective portal vein clamping method in liver cancer patients.

Comparison of the benefits and risks of hemihepatic inflow occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Application of hemihepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) and total hepatic inflow occlusion (TIO) are two common approaches for hepatectomy. However, their efficacy and safety remain controversial. Methods: Randomized control trials (RCTs) published before 15t January 2023 were included by a systematic literature search, which compared the clinical outcomes between HIO and TIO. The primary outcome was the estimated blood loss (EBL). Three independent authors screened and extracted the data and resolved disagreements by consensus. The ROB2.0 tool was used for evaluating the risk of bias. Results: A total of 1026 patients (511 TIO and 515 HIO) from 9 studies were analyzed in the meta-analyses. The EBL between TIO and HIO group was similar, while HIO was associated with a lower proportion of patients required transfusion (P=0.002), less units of blood transferred (P<0.001) and a lower overall complication rate (P=0.008). There were no significant differences between TIO and HIO in mortality (P=0.37), length of stay (P=0.97), bile leak rate (P=0.58), liver failure rate (P=0.96), reoperation rate (P=0.48), postoperative haemorrhage rate (P=0.93) and incidence of postoperative ascites (P=0.96). The operative time of HIO was usually no more than 15 min longer than that of TIO (P<0.001). Conclusions: Comparing with the TIO, HIO increased the operative time and failed to further reduce the EBL in patients with liver surgery. However, despite the complexity of the operation, HIO was recommended due to the similar effect on the consumption of blood products and the postoperative complications.

Total hepatic inflow occlusion vs. hemihepatic inflow occlusion for laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The control of bleeding during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is still a focus of research. However, the advantages of the main bleeding control methods, including total hepatic inflow occlusion (TIO) vs. hemihepatic inflow occlusion (HIO), during LLR remain controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who received TIO and patients who received HIO. This meta-analysis searched the Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane Library databases. The language of the studies was restricted to English, and comparative studies of patients treated with TIO and HIO during LLR were included. The primary outcome was to compare the intraoperative details, such as the operative time, occlusion time, and volume of blood loss, between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included conversion, overall complications, liver failure, biliary leakage, ascites, pleural effusion, and hospital stay. Five studies including 667 patients, 419 (62.82%) of whom received TIO and 248 (37.18%) of whom received HIO, were included in the analysis. The demographic data, including age, sex, hemoglobin, total bilirubin, albumin, and alpha-fetoprotein, were comparable. No significant differences noted in operative time, occlusion time, volume of blood loss, conversion, overall complications, liver failure, biliary leakage, hemorrhage, ascites, or pleural effusion. The hospital stay in patients who received HIO was significantly shorter than that for patients who received TIO [mean difference (MD), 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.87; p < 0.0001; I 2 = 54%]. The blood loss of patients with liver cirrhosis in the TIO group was significantly less than that in the HIO group (MD, -107.63; 95% CI, -152.63 to -62.63; p < 0.01; I 2 = 27%). Both the TIO and HIO methods are safe and feasible for LLR. Compared with HIO, TIO seems to have less blood loss in cirrhotic patients. However, this result demands further research, especially multicenter randomized controlled trials, for verification in the future. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, Identifier PROSPERO (CRD42022382334).

Does repeat laparoscopic hepatectomy without extracorporeal Pringle manoeuvre worsen treatment outcomes?

Introduction: The Pringle manoeuvre is used in most hospitals to counteract intraoperative haemorrhage in laparoscopic hepatectomy by occluding the flow of blood to the liver. However, in laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH), outcomes of previous surgery and the influence of other factors frequently make it difficult to occlude the inflow of blood. Aim: To discuss the value of inflow occlusion during LRH and provide tips for its performance. Material and methods: Sixty-three patients who underwent LRH with or without the Pringle manoeuvre were analysed retrospectively. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the Pringle manoeuvre in LRH. Student's t and χ2 tests, Mann-Whitney's U test, Wilcoxon's signed-rank test, and Fisher's exact test were used in the statistical analysis. Results: Nineteen patients underwent LRH with the Pringle manoeuvre, and 44 patients underwent LHR without the Pringle manoeuvre. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complication rate (p = 0.973, 0.120, and not applicable, respectively). However, the rate of conversion to open repeat hepatectomy (ORH) was significantly lower in the Pringle manoeuvre group (p = 0.034). In many cases, the cause of conversion to ORH was the non-use of inflow occlusion and the resulting inability to control intraoperative haemorrhage. Laboratory data collected after surgery showed no significant difference between the 2 groups regardless of whether blood flow was occluded or not. Conclusions: LRH with the Pringle manoeuvre can be performed safely using various surgical devices. However, it is often challenging to perform the Pringle manoeuvre in patients with a history of cholecystectomy or segment 5 resection of the liver, and caution is required.

Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion performed during hepatectomy on postoperative tumor-free survival (TFS) in patients treated with R0 resection. METHODS: In total, 343 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy (R0) with different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In total, 68.80% of the patients underwent hepatic inflow occlusion, including 46.65% with a routine Pringle maneuver and 22.16% with selective hemi-hepatic vascular exclusion (SHVE), during surgery. The TFS did not significantly differ among the Pringle group, the SHVE group and the no hepatic inflow occlusion group. After further stratifying the patients according to the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging system, the patients with BCLC stage A disease in the SHVE group and no hepatic inflow occlusion group displayed better TFS than those in the Pringle maneuver group (P=0.04; P=0.002), but the patients with BCLC stage B-C disease did not show significant differences among the groups. Furthermore, all 214 patients with BCLC stage A disease were classified into two subgroups according to the microvascular invasion (MVI) status. Interestingly, among the patients with MVI, those in the SHVE group and no hepatic inflow occlusion group had significantly longer TFS than those in the Pringle group (P=0.025; P=0.006); however, the patients without MVI did not show differences among the groups. Additionally, the multivariate analysis revealed that a tumor size ≥5 cm, an absent capsule, a low Edmondson grade, MVI positivity and performance of the Pringle maneuver were independent risk factors of the prognosis in patients with BCLC stage A disease. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic inflow occlusion and the surgical approach used to address this issue may have an impact on HCC prognosis in patients with BCLC stage A disease, especially among those with MVI positivity. No hepatic inflow occlusion or an SHVE approach rather than the Pringle maneuver should be considered first during hepatectomy for patients with BCLC stage A disease.

The impact of different hepatic vascular occlusion methods on hepatic parenchymal function in partial hepatectomy / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective To investigate the impact of different hepatic vascular inflow occlusion methods on hepatic parenchymal function in partial hepatectomy.Methods Between 2009 and 2010,62 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients underwent partial hepatectomy.In 13 patients,partial hepatectomy was carried out without using any inflow occlusion (group A).In 29 patients intermittent Pringle's maneuver (group B) while in 20 patients selective hepatic inflow occlusion (group C) were used.Intraoperative indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes (ICGR15) was measured using pulse spectrophotometry before and during hepatectomy. Results (1) Blood loss in group A was greater than group B and C (P=0.016,P=0.001).(2) There was no significant difference in the preoperative ICGR15 values among group A,B and C.The intraoperative ICGR15 for group B was significantly higher than group A and C (P=0.011,P=0.030).(3) A significant correlation was found between the level of ICGR15 and total inflow clamp time (r =0.484,P =0.001) and blood loss (r=0.349,P=0.005),respectively.(4) Compared with group A and B,postoperative liver function recovered significantly faster in group C.Conclusion Selective hepatic inflow occlusion was useful in controlling blood loss and it was beneficial to the hepatic functional reserve in the liver remnant.

Application of Selective Hepatic Vascular Occlusion to Laparoscopic Hepatectomy / 中国微创外科杂志

0.05).Conclusion Selective hepatic vascular occlusion is superior to complete hepatic vascular occlusion,and is worth being widely used.