A 52-week efficacy and safety study of enavogliflozin versus dapagliflozin as an add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: ENHANCE-M extension study.

AIM: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day added to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 24 weeks of a randomized, double-blind treatment period with enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day (n = 101) or dapagliflozin 10 mg/day (n = 99) added to metformin, all patients received enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day plus metformin for an additional 28 weeks during the open-label extension period. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients continued enavogliflozin (maintenance group), and 77 were switched from dapagliflozin to enavogliflozin (switch group). All adverse drug reactions (ADR) were mild in severity. In the maintenance group, ADRs (cystitis and vaginal infection) were reported in two patients (2.44%) during 52 weeks. In the switch group, ADR (hypoglycaemia) was reported in one patient (1.30%) during a 28-week open-label extension period. At week 52, glycated haemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose were significantly lower than at the baseline, by 0.85% and 29.08 mg/dl, respectively, in the maintenance group (p < .0001 for both), and by 0.81% and 32.77 mg/dl, respectively, in the switch group (p < .0001 for both). At week 52, 68.92% of patients from the maintenance group and 64.29% from the switch group achieved glycated haemoglobin <7%. A significant increase in the urine glucose-creatinine ratio was observed at week 52, by 58.81 g/g and 63.77 g/g in the maintenance and switch groups, respectively (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Enavogliflozin added to metformin was tolerated well for up to 52 weeks and provided continual glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, along with a significant increase in the urine glucose-creatinine ratio.

Do patients with prediabetes managed with metformin achieve better glycaemic control? A national study using primary care medical records.

AIMS: To estimate the effectiveness of metformin on glycaemic parameters among participants with incident prediabetes attending Australian general practices. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records of regular participants (3+ visits in two consecutive years) attending 383 Australian general practices (MedicineInsight). Participants with 'incident' prediabetes (newly recorded diagnosis between 2012 and 2017) and their glycaemic parameters (haemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] or fasting blood glucose [FBG]) at 6-, 12-, and 18-24 months post diagnosis (unexposed) or post-management with metformin (treatment) were identified from the database. We estimated the average treatment effect (ATE) of metformin management on glycaemic parameters using both linear regression and augmented inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: Of the 4770 investigated participants with 'incident' prediabetes, 10.2% were managed with metformin. Participants on metformin had higher HbA1c levels at the baseline than those unexposed (mean 45 mmol/mol [6.2%] and 41 mmol/mol [5.9%], respectively), but no differences were observed at 6-12 months (mmol/mol ATE 0.0, 95% CI -0.4; 0.7) or 12-18 months (ATE -0.3, 95% CI -1.2; 0.3). However, participants on metformin had lower mean HbA1c mmol/mol at 18-24 months (ATE -1.1, 95% CI -2.0; 0.1) than those unexposed. Consistent results were observed for FBG (ATE at 6-12 months -0.14 [95% CI -0.25; -0.04], 12-18 months 0.02 [95% CI -0.08; 0.13] and 18-24 months -0.07 [95% CI -0.25; 0.12]). CONCLUSION: The higher HbA1c and FBG baseline levels among participants with 'incident' prediabetes managed with metformin improved after 6-12 months of starting pharmacological management, and the effect persisted for up to 24 months. Management with metformin could prevent further deterioration of glycaemic levels.

Cardiovascular efficacy and safety of antidiabetic agents: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIM: An important characteristic of glucose-lowering therapies (GLTs) is their ability to prevent cardiovascular complications. We aimed to investigate the cardiorenal efficacy and general safety of GLTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicentre, randomized, clinical trials that included over 100 participants comparing antidiabetic agents with a placebo or a different antidiabetic agent and reporting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), or primarily reporting heart failure, were searched in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Data were extracted independently for random-effects network meta-analyses to calculate the hazard ratio estimates. RESULTS: Forty-three trials that compared nine types of GLTs were included in the present analysis. The risk of three-point MACE was reduced in the presence of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and thiazolidinedione therapy compared with the placebo, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, or insulin therapy. GLP-1 RAs were favourable for cardiovascular and renal outcomes. SGLT-2is reduced renal outcomes by ~40%, which was superior to other GLTs. Thiazolidinedione therapy increased the risks of hospitalization for heart failure and had no benefits on mortality. Adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were higher with GLP-1 RAs and thiazolidinediones than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1 RAs, SGLT-2is and thiazolidinediones reduced three-point MACE compared with other GLTs. Each drug class had unique advantages and disadvantages.

Association of Hepcidin levels in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus treated with metformin or combined anti-diabetic agents in Pakistani population.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of hepcidin and ferritin in pathogenesis and prognosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects taking only metformin or combined anti-glycaemic agents. METHODS: The observational case-control study was conducted at the Department of Physiology, Baqai Medical University, Karachi, from August 2019 to October 2020, and comprised subjects from both genders who categorised into equal groups as non-diabetic controls, newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus patients without any treatment, type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with exposure to metformin only, type 2 diabetes mellitus patients taking oral hypoglycaemic agents along with metformin, type 2 diabetes mellitus patients taking only insulin, and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients taking insulin and oral hypoglycaemic agents. Fasting plasma glucose was determined using glucose oxidase-peroxidase method, glycated haemoglobin by high performance liquid chromatography, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein by direct methods, cholesterol by cholesterol oxidase phenol 4-amino antipyrine peroxidase and triglycerides by glycerol phosphate oxidase-phenol 4-amino antipyrine peroxidase method. Serum levels of ferritin, insulin and hepcidin were evaluated using Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Insulin resistance was assessed using homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: Of the 300 subjects, there were 50(16.66%) in each of the 6 groups. Overall, there were 144(48%) males and 155(51.66%) females. The mean age was significantly lower in the control group 34.72±7.87 compared to all the diabetic groups (p<0.05), and the same was the case with respect to all the parameters (p<0.05) except high-density lipoprotein (p>0.05). Besides, hepcidin level was significantly higher in the control group (p<0.05). Ferritin levels were significantly increased in newly-diagnosed T2DM subjects compared to the controls (p<0.05) while all other groups showed decreased ferritin levels (p<0.05). Hepcidin gave inverse correlation with glycated haemoglobin only in diabetics taking only metformin (r = -0.27, p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-diabetes drugs not only addressed type 2 diabetes mellitus, but also reduced levels of ferritin and hepcidin that are found to play a role in diabetes development.

Prescribing costs of hypoglycaemic agents and associations with metabolic control in Wales; a national analysis of primary care data.

AIMS: There has been a dramatic increase in hypoglycaemic agent expenditure. We assessed the variability in prescribing costs at the practice level and the relationship between expenditure and the proportion of patients achieving target glycaemic control. METHODS: We utilized national prescribing data from 406 general practices in Wales. This was compared against glycaemic control (percentage of patients achieving a HbA1c level < 59 mmol/mol in the preceding 12 months). Analyses were adjusted for the number of patients with diabetes in each general practice and the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation. RESULTS: There was considerable heterogeneity in hypoglycaemic agent spend per patient with diabetes, Median = £289 (IQR 247-343) range £31.1-£1713. Higher total expenditure was not associated with improved glycaemic control B(std)  = -0.01 (95%CI -0.01, 0.002) p = 0.13. High-spend practices spent more on SGLT2 inhibitors (16 vs. 9% p < 0.001) and GLP-1 agonists (13 vs. 11% p < 0.001) and less on insulin (34 vs. 42% p < 0.001), biguanides (9 vs. 11% p = 0.001) and sulphonylureas (2 vs. 3% p < 0.001) than low spend practices. There were no differences in the pattern of drug prescribing between high spend practices with better glycaemic control (mean 68% of patients HbA1c <59 mmol/mol) and those with less good metabolic control (mean 58% of patients HbA1c <59 mmol/mol). CONCLUSIONS: Spend on hypoglycaemic agents is highly variable between practices and increased expenditure per patient is not associated with better glycaemic control. Whilst newer, more expensive agents have additional benefits, in individuals where these advantages are more marginal widespread use of these agents has important cost implications.

Effects of first-line diabetes therapy with biguanides, sulphonylurea and thiazolidinediones on the differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis of islet cell populations.

AIMS: Metformin, rosiglitazone and sulfonylureas enhance either insulin action or secretion and thus have been used extensively as early stage anti-diabetic medication, independently of the aetiology of the disease. When administered to newly diagnosed diabetes patients, these drugs produce variable results. Here, we examined the effects of the three early stage oral hypoglycaemic agents in mice with diabetes induced by multiple low doses of streptozotocin, focusing specifically on the developmental biology of pancreatic islets. METHODS: Streptozotocin-treated diabetic mice expressing a fluorescent reporter specifically in pancreatic islet α-cells were administered the biguanide metformin (100 mg/kg), thiazolidinedione rosiglitazone (10 mg/kg), or sulfonylurea tolbutamide (20 mg/kg) for 10 days. We assessed the impact of the treatment on metabolic status of the animals as well as on the morphology, proliferative potential and transdifferentiation of pancreatic islet cells, using immunofluorescence. RESULTS: The effect of the therapy on the islet cells varied depending on the drug and included enhanced pancreatic islet ß-cell proliferation, in case of metformin and rosiglitazone; de-differentiation of α-cells and ß-cell apoptosis with tolbutamide; increased relative number of ß-cells and bi-hormonal insulin + glucagon + cells with metformin. These effects were accompanied by normalisation of food and fluid intake with only minor effects on glycaemia at the low doses of the agents employed. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that metformin and rosiglitazone attenuate the depletion of the ß-cell pool in the streptozotocin-induced diabetes, whereas tolbutamide exacerbates the ß-cell apoptosis, but is likely to protect ß-cells from chronic hyperglycaemia by directly elevating insulin secretion.

First-line pharmacotherapy for incident type 2 diabetes: Prescription patterns, adherence and associated costs.

AIMS: To use real-world prescription data from Alberta, Canada to: (a) describe the prescribing patterns for initial pharmacotherapy for those with newly diagnosed uncomplicated type 2 diabetes; (b) describe medication-taking behaviours (adherence and persistence) in the first year after initiating pharmacotherapy; and (c) explore healthcare system costs associated with prescribing patterns. METHODS: We employed a retrospective cohort design using linked administrative datasets from 2012 to 2017 to define a cohort of those with uncomplicated incident diabetes. We summarized the initial prescription patterns, adherence and costs (healthcare and pharmaceutical) over the first year after initiation of pharmacotherapy. Using multivariable regression, we determined the association of these outcomes with various sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: The majority of individuals for whom metformin was indicated as first-line therapy received a prescription for metformin monotherapy (89%). Older individuals, those with higher baseline A1C and those with no comorbidities, were most likely to be started on non-metformin agents. Adherence with the initially prescribed regimen was suboptimal overall, with nearly half (48%) being non-adherent over the first year. One-third of those who started metformin discontinued it in the first 3 months. Those started on non-metformin agents had roughly twice the healthcare costs, and five to seven times higher medication costs, compared to those started on metformin, in the first year after starting therapy. CONCLUSIONS: With the addition of new classes of medications, healthcare providers who look after those with type 2 diabetes have more pharmaceutical options than ever. Most individuals continue to be prescribed metformin monotherapy. However, adherence is suboptimal, and drops off considerably within the first 3 months.

Efficacy of metformin monotherapy in US veterans with type 2 diabetes and preexisting chronic kidney disease stage 3.

AIM: To evaluate the glycaemic efficacy of metformin in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD3). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study including 145980 US veterans with T2D and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 who initiated metformin monotherapy between November 1999 and July 2017. Propensity-score-matched cohorts were generated based on baseline variables associated with CKD3 (eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) to evaluate the independent association between CKD3 and metformin discontinuation, the addition of a second hypoglycaemic agent, and changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline in those with and without CKD3. Associations were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable regression models, adjusted for baseline and 12-month average metformin dose. RESULTS: The mean age of the entire cohort was 60.7 years, and 95% of the cohort were men, 21% were African American and 9% had CKD3. In the adjusted analyses, patients with CKD3 had a higher risk of metformin discontinuation or addition of a second hypoglycaemic agent, as compared with patients without CKD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.26, and HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.40, respectively). Among metformin monotherapy users, there were no differences in the average HbA1c reduction from baseline to 12 or 24 months between patients with and without CKD3. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with CKD3 and T2D were at increased risk of metformin monotherapy failure. However, the HbA1c-lowering efficacy of metformin was similar in patients with and without CKD3, highlighting that metformin is a valuable treatment option for newly treated individuals with T2D and CKD3.

Follow-up at 1 year and beyond of women with gestational diabetes treated with insulin and/or oral glucose-lowering agents: a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is linked with a higher lifetime risk for the development of impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, postpartum depression and tumours. Despite this, there is no consistency in the long-term follow-up of women with a previous diagnosis of GDM. Further, the outcomes selected and reported in the research involving this population are heterogeneous and lack standardisation. This amplifies the risk of reporting bias and diminishes the likelihood of significant comparisons between studies. The aim of this study is to develop a core outcome set (COS) for RCTs and other studies evaluating the long-term follow-up at 1 year and beyond of women with previous GDM treated with insulin and/oral glucose-lowering agents. METHODS: The study consisted of three work packages: (1) a systematic review of the outcomes reported in previous RCTs of the follow-up at 1 year and beyond of women with GDM treated with insulin and/or oral glucose-lowering agents; (2) a three-round online Delphi survey with key stakeholders to prioritise these outcomes; and (3) a consensus meeting where the final COS was decided. RESULTS: Of 3344 abstracts identified and evaluated, 62 papers were retrieved and 25/62 papers were included in this review. A total of 121 outcomes were identified and included in the Delphi survey. Delphi round 1 was emailed to 835 participants and 288 (34.5%) responded. In round 2, 190 of 288 (65.9%) participants responded and in round 3, 165 of 190 (86.8%) participants responded. In total, nine outcomes were selected and agreed for inclusion in the final COS: assessment of glycaemic status; diagnosis of type 2 diabetes since the index pregnancy; number of pregnancies since the index pregnancy; number of pregnancies with a diagnosis of GDM since the index pregnancy; diagnosis of prediabetes since the index pregnancy; BMI; post-pregnancy weight retention; resting blood pressure; and breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: This study identified a COS that will help bring consistency and uniformity to outcome selection and reporting in clinical trials and other studies involving the follow-up at 1 year and beyond of women diagnosed with GDM treated with insulin and/or oral glucose-lowering agents during pregnancy.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of fractures of the upper or lower limbs in patients with type 2 diabetes: A nested case-control study.

AIMS: To investigate whether the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors is associated with an increased risk of fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a cohort study with nested case-control analysis based on the InGef database between November 2011 and December 2016 among patients with type 2 diabetes who were initiating treatment with, switching to, or adding a new class of non-insulin antidiabetic drug. Patients with a hospital or ambulatory diagnosis of fractures of the upper or lower limbs were included and were matched to up to 40 randomly sampled control subjects. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate confounder adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of fractures, comparing current use of metformin plus SGLT-2 inhibitor or metformin plus another antidiabetic drug class to metformin plus DPP-4 inhibitor as reference. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 210 042 new users of non-insulin antidiabetic drugs. For the nested case-control analysis, 7522 patients with fractures were matched to 296 845 control subjects. In the crude and confounder adjusted analyses, current use of metformin plus SGLT-2 inhibitor compared to current use of metformin plus DPP-4 inhibitor was not associated with fractures (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.72-1.39 and OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.71-1.37, respectively). Similarly, no statistically significant association was found for current use of metformin plus another antidiabetic drug class. No treatment effect modification was observed after stratification by number of documented risk factors for falls and fractures (< 4 vs ≥ 4) and age (< 75 vs ≥ 75 years). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and other antidiabetic drug classes are not associated with an increased risk of fractures of the upper or lower limbs compared to use of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Long-term effects on glycaemic control and ß-cell preservation of early intensive treatment in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: A multicentre randomized trial.

AIM: To determine the effects of early intensive glycaemic control with intensive insulin treatment (IIT) or initial combined oral antidiabetic drug (COAD) therapy on long-term glycaemic control and the preservation of ß-cell function in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Newly diagnosed drug-naïve patients with T2DM from 8 outpatient diabetes centres were randomized to receive either IIT (n = 50; glargine/glulisine) or COAD (n = 47; glimepiride/metformin) as intensive treatment until the termination criteria to ensure euglycaemia were met. After intensive treatment, the patients completed a follow-up period with either lifestyle modification (LSM) alone or rescue therapy to maintain target glycated haemoglobin levels of <7% (53 mmol/mol) up to week 104. The primary outcomes were analysed after excluding participants who were anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody-positive. RESULTS: Both intensive treatment methods were effective for short-term glycaemic control, but improvements in the disposition index (DI) were significantly greater in the IIT group than in the COAD group (P = .021). During the follow-up period after intensive treatment, the two groups significantly differed in rescue method regarding the maintenance of comparable levels of glycaemic control (P = .010) and more participants who received IIT exhibited well-controlled glycaemia with LSM alone. Additionally, the IIT group maintained a higher DI than the COAD group during the follow-up period. Cox regression analysis showed that the IIT method was associated with a 52.5% lower risk of failing to maintain drug-free glycaemic remission compared with the COAD method (P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that outpatient clinic-based IIT to ensure euglycaemia in newly diagnosed patients with T2DM might be an effective initial therapeutic option for improvements in ß-cell function and glycaemic control over the long term, without serious adverse events.

Molecular modelling and synthesis of spiroimidazolidine-2,4-diones with dual activities as hypoglycemic agents and selective inhibitors of aldose reductase.

Novel derivatives of spiroimidazolidinedione were synthesized and evaluated as hypoglycemic agents through binding to sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) in pancreatic beta-cells. Their selectivity index was calculated against both aldehyde reductase (ALR1) and aldose reductase (ALR2). Aldehyde reductase is a key enzyme in the polyol pathway that is involved in the etiology of the secondary diabetic complications. All structures were confirmed by microanalysis and by IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and EI-MS spectroscopy. The investigated compounds were subjected to molecular docking and an in silico prediction study to determine their free energy of binding (ΔG) values and predict their physicochemical properties and drug-likeness scores. Compound 1'-(5-chlorothiophene-2-ylsulfonyl)spiro[cyclohexane-1,5'-imidazolidine]-2',4'-dione showed IC50 0.47 µM and 79% reduction in blood glucose level with a selectivity index 127 for ALR2.

Temporal changes in glycaemic thresholds for treatment intensification in type 2 diabetes in an urban Australian setting: the Fremantle Diabetes Study.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy and supportive care for diabetes in Australia are improving, with potential beneficial effects on therapeutic procrastination. AIM: To determine whether glycaemic thresholds for therapeutic intensification in type 2 diabetes changed over the 15 years between phases of the community-based Fremantle Diabetes Study (FDS). METHODS: We studied 531 Phase 1 participants (mean age 62.4 years, 54.2% males, median diabetes duration 3.0 years) with valid data from baseline assessment and five subsequent annual reviews between 1993 and 2001 and 930 Phase 2 participants (mean age 65.3 years, 53.8% males, median diabetes duration 8.0 years) with valid data from baseline and two subsequent biennial reviews between 2008 and 2015. The main outcome measure was HbA1c at assessments before and after change in blood glucose-lowering therapy (average 6 months in Phase 1, 12 months in Phase 2). RESULTS: Ninety-seven participants in Phase 1 and 84 in Phase 2 progressed from diet-based management to oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA) and 45 and 85 participants, respectively, progressed from diet/OHA to insulin. The median HbA1c was 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) and 6.9% (52 mmol/mol) before OHA initiation in Phases 1 and 2, respectively, and 9.1% (76 mmol/mol) and 7.8% (62 mmol/mol), respectively, before insulin initiation. There were median HbA1c falls of 0.3% (3 mmol/mol) and 1.5% (16 mmol/mol) after OHA and insulin initiation in Phase 1, but no statistically significant changes in Phase 2. CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c thresholds triggering treatment intensification fell between FDS phases, suggesting a more proactive approach to management of glycaemia over time.

Diabetes and risk of cancer incidence: results from a population-based cohort study in northern Italy.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to compare cancer incidence in populations with and without diabetes by cancer site. Furthermore, we aimed at comparing excess risk of cancer according to diabetes type, diabetes duration and treatment, the latter as regards Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: By use of the Reggio Emilia diabetes registry we classified the resident population aged 20-84 at December 31st 2009 into two groups: with and without diabetes. By linking with the cancer registry we calculated the 2010-2013 cancer incidence in both groups. The incidence rate ratios (IRR) by cancer site, type of diabetes, diabetes duration, and as concerns Type 2 diabetes, by treatment regimen were computed using Poisson regression model and non-diabetic group as reference. RESULTS: The cohort included 383,799 subjects without diabetes and 23,358 with diabetes. During follow-up, we identified 1464 cancer cases in subjects with diabetes and 9858 in the remaining population. Overall cancer incidence was higher in subjects with diabetes than in those without diabetes (IRR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.15-1.29), with similar results focusing on subjects with at least 2-year diabetes duration. Cancer sites driving overall increased risk were liver, pancreas, Colon rectum, and bladder in both sexes, corpus uteri for females. There was also suggestion of an increased risk for kidney cancer in females and a decreased risk for prostate cancer. Excess risk was found in patients with Type 2 diabetes, more marked among insulin users, especially with combined therapy. We observed an increasing risk for diabetes duration up to 10 years from diagnosis (IRR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.29-1.61) and a subsequent decrease to moderate-higher risk (IRR = 1.15, 95%CI 1.04-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the strength of association depends on specific cancer site. Insulin, monotherapy or combined therapy, per se or as an indication of poor blood glucose control, in addition to diabetes duration, may play a role in the association of diabetes and cancer.

Euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis in patients using sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are an increasingly prescribed class of medication for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Euglycaemic diabetic ketoacidosis (euDKA) has been reported in association with SGLT2i use. Clinicians need to understand how to recognise and treat this complication. We describe three cases of euDKA in patients treated with SGLT2i.

The A1C Prandial Product: An objective tool to decision making in diabetes.

This brief article describes a numerical index designed to assess the relative contribution of fasting and postprandial glucose to hyperglycaemia. This helps plan appropriate insulin and oral glucose-lowering therapy in an objective manner. It also reviews three similar indices described earlier in literature. Such indices need to be validated in large, multicentric trials, and have the potential to bring objectivity to choice of treatment of diabetes.

Early glycaemic control in metformin users receiving their first add-on therapy: a population-based study of 4,734 people with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aims of this work were to assess glycaemic control in metformin users receiving their first add-on glucose-lowering therapy and to examine the real-life effectiveness of different add-on drugs. METHODS: We carried out a population-based cohort study using healthcare databases in northern Denmark during 2000-2012. We included 4,734 persons who initiated metformin monotherapy and added another glucose-lowering drug within 3 years. Attainment of recommended HbA1c goals within 6 months of add-on was investigated, using Poisson regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, baseline HbA(1c), diabetes duration, complications and Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: Median metformin treatment duration at intensification was 12 months (interquartile range [IQR] 4-23 months) and pre-intensification HbA(1c) was 8.0% (IQR 7.2-9.2%) (64 [IQR 55-77] mmol/mol). Median HbA(1c) dropped 1.2% (13 mmol/mol) with a sulfonylurea (SU) add-on, 0.8% (9 mmol/mol) with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, 1.3% (14 mmol/mol) with a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, 0.9% (10 mmol/mol) with other non-insulin drugs and 2.4% (26 mmol/mol) with insulin. Compared with SU add-on, attainment of HbA(1c) <7% (<53 mmol/mol) was higher with GLP-1 receptor agonists (adjusted RR [aRR] 1.10; 95% CI 1.01, 1.19) and lower with DPP-4 inhibitors (aRR 0.94; 95% CI 0.89, 0.99), other drugs (aRR 0.86; 95% CI 0.77, 0.96) and insulin (aRR 0.88; 95% CI 0.77, 0.99). The proportion of metformin add-on users who attained HbA(1c) <7% (<53 mmol/mol) increased from 46% in 2000-2003 to 59% in 2010-2012, whereas attainment of HbA(1c) <6.5% (<48 mmol/mol) remained 30% among patients aged <65 years without comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Among early type 2 diabetes patients receiving their first metformin add-on treatment, HbA(1c) reduction with different non-insulin drugs is similar to, and comparable with, that observed in randomised trials, yet 41% do not achieve HbA(1c) <7% (<53 mmol/mol) within 6 months.

Understanding medication adherence among patients of Turkish descent with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore perspectives of Turkish migrants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on adherence to oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA). DESIGN: In-depth interviews with 21 T2DM patients of Turkish descent recruited from primary care and community sources in Ghent, Belgium, using a theoretical sampling procedure. Analysis was guided by a grounded theory approach, using Nvivo 8. RESULTS: Respondents reported a multitude of barriers and facilitators of adherence to OHA. Some of these barriers are distinctive for T2DM patients of Turkish descent. Respondents' causal beliefs about stress and the Belgian climate often led to non-adherence during less stressful periods, like summer holidays in Turkey. Some respondents adjusted their medication use to food intake or during Ramadan fasting. Concerns about OHA were the main reason for the widespread use of herbal medicine in this sample. The religious framework used to interpret diabetes led, in combination with feelings of depression, to non-adherence in some respondents while it facilitated medication adherence in others. A potential gender effect with respect to the self-management of OHA was observed. Non-distinctive factors include: beliefs about OHA, polypharmacy, beliefs about the course of diabetes, forgetfulness, the perception of the doctor's medical expertise, feelings of depression and social support. CONCLUSION: Health care providers should explore in detail and regularly patients' perspectives on illness beliefs, medication beliefs and their trust in doctors' medical expertise as this will provide useful starting points for promoting medication adherence. Whenever possible health care workers should engage with their patients in therapeutic alliances.

Evaluation of microalbuminuria in type-2 diabetes mellitus under oral hypoglycemic agents: Association with age, sex, BMI, and renal clearance.

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing drastically and affecting the individuals globally, especially in the low- and middle-income countries like India. The poor glycaemic control results in micro-vascular and macro-vascular complications, leading to dysfunction of multiple organs. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the risk factors and microalbuminuria levels among patients with type 2 DM on oral hypoglycaemic agents. Materials and Methods: Hundred type 2 DM patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected by convenient random sampling. Demographic details, biochemical markers, and anti-diabetic medication details were collected. The findings were analyzed statistically using Chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS software 21.0. Results: Among the different combination therapies, 59% were commonly using metformin and teneligliptin. There was a significant association noted between microalbuminuria and risk factors like age, duration of disease, body mass index (BMI) (25.5 ± 2.9), fasting blood sugar (151 ± 53.2 mg/dL), post prandial blood sugar (227.01 ± 70.9 mg/dL), blood urea (24.42 ± 9.3 mg/dL), and serum creatinine (1.5 ± 0.2 mg/dL) (P < 0.001). One-way ANOVA showed statistical significance between microalbuminuria and the different treatment groups (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Microalbuminuria was associated with age, duration of diabetes, glycaemic control, and BMI. In contrast, there was no significant difference noted between the genders and microalbuminuria. Microalbuminuria is an early indication of nephropathy in diabetes patients. The early identification of the risk factors is important, and it is always recommended to screen for microalbuminuria in all the diabetic patients for early detection and prevention of diabetic nephropathy and their associated complications.

National trends in utilisation of glucose lowering medicines by older people with diabetes in long-term care facilities.

AIMS: To examine national trends in glucose lowering medicine (GLM) use among older people with diabetes in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) during 2009-2019. METHODS: A repeated cross-sectional study of individuals ≥65 years with diabetes in Australian LTCFs (n = 140,322) was conducted. Annual age-sex standardised prevalence of GLM use and number of defined daily doses (DDDs)/1000 resident-days were estimated. Multivariable Poisson or Negative binomial regression models were used to estimate adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Prevalence of GLM use remained steady between 2009 (63.9%, 95 %CI 63.3-64.4) and 2019 (64.3%, 95 %CI 63.9-64.8) (aRR 1.00, 95 %CI 1.00-1.00). The percentage of residents receiving metformin increased from 36.0% (95 %CI 35.3-36.7) to 43.5% (95 %CI 42.9-44.1) (aRR 1.01, 95 %CI 1.01-1.01). Insulin use also increased from 21.5% (95 %CI 21.0-22.0) to 27.0% (95 %CI 26.5-27.5) (aRR 1.02, 95 %CI 1.02-1.02). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor use increased from 1.0% (95 %CI 0.9-1.1) to 21.1% (95 %CI 20.7-21.5) (aRR 1.24, 95 %CI 1.24-1.25), while sulfonylurea use decreased from 34.4% (95 %CI 33.8-35.1) to 19.3% (95 %CI 18.9-19.7) (aRR 0.93, 95 %CI 0.93-0.94). Similar trends were observed in DDDs/1000 resident days. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing use of insulin and ongoing use of sulfonylureas suggests a need to implement evidence-based strategies to optimise diabetes care in LTCFs.