Interim [18F]FDG PET/CT can predict response to anti-PD-1 treatment in metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: In an attempt to identify biomarkers that can reliably predict long-term outcomes to immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma, we investigated the prognostic role of [18F]FDG PET/CT, performed at baseline and early during the course of anti-PD-1 treatment. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with stage IV melanoma, scheduled for treatment with PD-1 inhibitors, were enrolled in the study (pembrolizumab, n = 8 patients; nivolumab, n = 4 patients; nivolumab/ipilimumab, 13 patients). [18F]FDG PET/CT was performed before the start of treatment (baseline PET/CT) and after the initial two cycles of PD-1 blockade administration (interim PET/CT). Seventeen patients underwent also a third PET/CT scan after administration of four cycles of treatment. Evaluation of patients' response by means of PET/CT was performed after application of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1999 criteria and the PET Response Evaluation Criteria for IMmunoTherapy (PERCIMT). Response to treatment was classified into 4 categories: complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), stable metabolic disease (SMD), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD). Patients were further grouped into two groups: those demonstrating metabolic benefit (MB), including patients with SMD, PMR, and CMR, and those demonstrating no MB (no-MB), including patients with PMD. Moreover, patterns of [18F]FDG uptake suggestive of radiologic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were documented. Progression-free survival (PFS) was measured from the date of interim PET/CT until disease progression or death from any cause. RESULTS: Median follow-up from interim PET/CT was 24.2 months (19.3-41.7 months). According to the EORTC criteria, 14 patients showed MB (1 CMR, 6 PMR, and 7 SMD), while 11 patients showed no-MB (PMD). Respectively, the application of the PERCIMT criteria revealed that 19 patients had MB (1 CMR, 6 PMR, and 12 SMD), and 6 of them had no-MB (PMD). With regard to PFS, no significant difference was observed between patients with MB and no-MB on interim PET/CT according to the EORTC criteria (p = 0.088). In contrary, according to the PERCIMT criteria, patients demonstrating MB had a significantly longer PFS than those showing no-MB (p = 0.045). The emergence of radiologic irAEs (n = 11 patients) was not associated with a significant survival benefit. Regarding the sub-cohort undergoing also a third PET/CT, 14/17 patients (82%) showed concordant responses and 3/17 (18%) had a mismatch of response assessment between interim and late PET/CT. CONCLUSION: PET/CT-based response of metastatic melanoma to PD-1 blockade after application of the recently proposed PERCIMT criteria is significantly correlated with PFS. This highlights the potential ability of [18F]FDG PET/CT for early stratification of response to anti-PD-1 agents, a finding with possible significant clinical and financial implications. Further studies including larger numbers of patients are necessary to validate these results.

Prognostic impact of interim positron emission tomography in mantle cell lymphoma patients treated with frontline R-CHOP.

Although 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18 F-FDG PET) is commonly used for initial staging and therapeutic response evaluation in aggressive lymphomas, its prognostic utility for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the correlations of interim PET (iPET) and end-of-treatment PET (ePET) response with survival outcomes in 89 consecutive advanced MCL patients treated with frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone). iPET positivity was strongly associated with inferior five-year overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 7·84, P < 0·0001] and poor five-year progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 3·34, P < 0·0001). OS and PFS were more favourable in the order early metabolic responder (iPETneg  â†’ ePETneg ), delayed responder (iPETpos  â†’ ePETneg ), loss-metabolic responder (iPETneg  â†’ ePETpos ), and never-metabolic responder (iPETpos  â†’ ePETpos ). In the autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT)-fit subgroup, OS was more favourable in the order early metabolic responders, delayed metabolic responders, and non-metabolic responders, with a marginal trend toward statistical significance (HR 3·41, P = 0·051), and PFS was significantly superior in early metabolic responders (HR 4·43, P = 0·002). In a group that was ineligible for auto-HSCT, OS and PFS were significantly superior in early metabolic responders. Our results suggested that iPET is of prognostic value and an independent predictor of survival in MCL patients receiving frontline R-CHOP. Therefore, prospective clinical trials of iPET-guided treatment strategies for these patients are warranted.

Prognostic analysis of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is routinely used in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) for staging, assessment of remission and recurrence, and estimation of therapeutic efficacy. In this study, we aimed to assess the role of an early interim PET/computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of response in DLBCL. METHODS: Sixty primary DLBCL patients (31 females) were analyzed. Baseline and follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in patients after one cycle (n = 30) and two cycles (n = 30) of chemotherapy. The ΔSUVmax% was calculated. Patients were additionally evaluated using the conventional Deauville five-point scale (D-5PS) system. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was employed to characterize the MYC gene status. We determined the optimum cutoff value of ΔSUVmax% using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to test for the influence of prognostic values. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff for the prediction of treatment outcome was a ΔSUVmax% of 57% (after one cycle) and 63% (after two cycles); we could not detect a difference in accuracy with respect to a PET scan performed after one cycle and two cycles of chemotherapy (P > 0.05). The ΔSUVmax% and the D-5PS (score 5) showed the highest prognostic value compared to a score of 3 and/or 4 (both after one cycle and two cycles). No significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or the area of under the curve (AUC) of ΔSUVmax% and D-5PS (score 5) was observed between PETs performed after one cycle or two cycles of therapy (P > 0.05). ΔSUVmax%, D-5PS (score 5), and MYC gene rearrangement correlated significantly (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Interim 18F-FDG PET/CT after one cycle of chemotherapy is feasible and yields similar predictive results as compared to an interim 18F-FDG PET/CT after two cycles of chemotherapy in patients suffering from DLBCL. The combination of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT with the MYC gene diagnosis might provide increased prognostic value for DLBCL.

The role of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in prediction of response to ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to assess the value of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT performed after the first two cycles of ipilimumab treatment in the prediction of the final clinical response to this type of immunotherapy. METHODS: The study group comprised 41 patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma scheduled for ipilimumab therapy. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed before the start of ipilimumab treatment (baseline PET/CT) and after the initial two cycles of ipilimumab treatment (interim PET/CT). Evaluation of patient response to treatment was based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1999 criteria for PET as well as the recently proposed PET Response Evaluation Criteria for Immunotherapy (PERCIMT). The patients' best clinical response, assessed at a median of 21.4 months (range 6.3-41.9 months) was used as reference. RESULTS: According to their best clinical response, the patients were divided into two groups: those showing clinical benefit (CB) including stable disease, partial response and complete response (31 patients), and those showing no clinical benefit (no-CB including progressive disease (10 patients). According to the EORTC criteria, interim PET/CT demonstrated progressive metabolic disease (PMD) in 20 patients, stable metabolic disease (SMD) in 11 patients, partial metabolic response (PMR) in 8 patients, and complete metabolic response (CMR) in 2 patients. According to the PERCIMT, interim PET/CT demonstrated PMD in 9 patients, SMD in 24 patients, PMR in 6 patients and CMR in 2 patients. On the basis of the interim PET, the patients were divided in a similar manner to the division according to clinical response into those showing metabolic benefit (MB) including SMD, PMR and CMR, and those showing no metabolic benefit (no-MB) including PMD. According to this dichotomization, the EORTC criteria showed a sensitivity (correctly predicting CB) of 64.5%, a specificity (correctly predicting no-CB) of 90.0%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95.2%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 45.0% and an accuracy of 70.7% in predicting best clinical response. The PERCIMT showed a sensitivity of 93.6%, a specificity of 70.0%, a PPV of 90.6%, a NPV of 77.8% and an accuracy of 87.8%. The McNemar test showed that the PERCIMT had a significantly higher sensitivity than EORTC criteria (p = 0.004), while there was no significant difference in specificity (p = 0.5). The agreement between the two sets of criteria was poor (McNemar test p = 0.001, and accordingly kappa = 0.46). CONCLUSION: The application of the recently proposed PERCIMT to interim 18F-FDG PET/CT provides a more sensitive predictor of final clinical response to immunotherapy than the application of the EORTC criteria in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Validation of the ΔSUVmax for Interim PET Interpretation in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma on the Basis of the GAINED Clinical Trial.

The GAINED phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01659099) evaluated a PET-driven consolidative strategy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In this post hoc analysis, we aimed to compare the prognostic value of the per-protocol PET interpretation criteria (Menton 2011 consensus) with the change in the SUVmax (ΔSUVmax) alone. Methods: Real-time central review of 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 581 patients after 2 cycles (PET2) and 4 cycles (PET4) of immunochemotherapy using the Menton 2011 criteria, combining the ΔSUVmax (cutoffs of 66% and 70% at PET2 and PET4, respectively) and the Deauville scale. In "special cases," when the baseline SUVmax was less than 10.0 or the interim residual tumor SUVmax was greater than 5.0, the Menton 2011 experts' consensus agreed that the ΔSUVmax may not be reliable and that the Deauville score is preferable. Prognostic values of Menton 2011 and ΔSUVmax were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analyses in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Seventeen percent of patients at PET2 (100/581) and 8% at PET4 (49/581) had PET-negative results by ΔSUVmax but were considered to have PET-positive results according to Menton 2011 with residual SUVmax of greater than 5.0. For the population with PET2-positive results, 2-y PFS was 70% (range, 58%-80%) with ΔSUVmax alone, whereas the outcome tended to be better for those who were considered to have PET-positive results by Menton 2011, 81% (range, 72%-87%). Conversely, all 10 patients with baseline SUVmax of less than 10.0 had PET2-positive results by ΔSUVmax but were considered to have PET2-negative results by Menton 2011. These patients had the same 2-y PFS as patients with PET2-negative/PET4-negative results, indicating that the ΔSUVmax yielded false-positive results in this situation. Conclusion: We recommend the use of the ΔSUVmax alone rather than the Menton 2011 criteria for assessing the interim metabolic response in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, except when the baseline SUVmax is less than 10.0.

The Prognostic Utility of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography-Based Analyses of Metabolic Response Rates in Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Patients.

Background: Roughly one third of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients experience relapsed or refractory disease, and their prognosis is unsatisfactory. It is thus important to identify patients who respond poorly to first-line treatment. Some studies have evaluated the prognostic value of interim PET-CT (iPET-CT) or end-of-treatment PET-CT (ePET-CT) in lymphoma patients, but there have been few studies exploring the prognostic value of metabolic response rates in the evaluation of DLBCL patients. Methods: Consecutive newly diagnosed DLBCL patients were screened from March 2013 to June 2020. Patients received at least four cycles of chemotherapy, and underwent baseline, iPET-CT and ePET-CT scanning. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank tests were employed to assess survival outcomes including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Independent predictors of survival were identified through univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Results: 307 patients were evaluated. At the time of iPET-CT scanning, 250, 45, and 12 patients exhibited complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD)/progressive disease (PD), respectively. The percentage of negative iPET-CT was 81.4% (250/307). Among 295 patients with ePET-CT, 262 (88.8%) achieved negativity and 33 (11.2%) exhibited positivity including 26 PR and 7 PD. The 2-year PFS and 2-year OS for patients with iPET-CT positivity were 50.7% and 76.5%, respectively, and were significantly shorter than those for patients with iPET-CT negativity (2-year PFS 82.7%, p<0.001; 2-year OS 94.2%, p<0.001). Patients with ePET-CT positivity had significant poorer 2-year PFS (48.1%) and 2-year OS (78.5%) compared with those ePET-CT negativity (2-year PFS 83.8%, p<0.001; 2-year OS 94.9%, p<0.001). The positivity rates on iPET-CT and ePET-CT evaluation were significantly higher in patients in the high/high-intermediate risk group compared with patients in the low/low-intermediate group. In a multivariable analysis, high/high-intermediate international prognostic index (IPI) and ePET-CT positivity were independently associated with poor PFS and OS. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the speed of metabolic response to treatment is of limited prognostic value in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. Patients exhibiting PR at iPET-CT evaluation should carefully consider whether to change chemotherapy regimen.

Prognostic significance of interim 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography volumetric parameters in metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer.

AIM: To evaluate the prognostic role of interim analysis of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) volumetric parameters in patients with recurrent or metastatic advanced gastric cancer (AGC) treated with fluoropyrimidine-based palliative chemotherapy. METHODS: Forty-four patients who underwent baseline and interim PET/CT scanning during palliative chemotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. Initial and change of metabolic parameters (MP) - metabolic tumor volume (MTV), tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG) and maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUV) were measured with PET/CT. Metabolic change was measured by ∆MP (%)  =  (MPinterim  - MPinitial )/MP initial   ×  100. Independent t-test was employed to compare values of initial, interim and change of metabolic parameters between each response group. Log-rank test was employed for univariate analysis, and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model to determine independently significant prognostic factors. RESULTS: Reduced percentage values of maximum and mean SUV on interim PET/CT and initial values of volumetric parameters (MTV and TLG) were significant predicting factors to response to fluoropyrimidine-based palliative chemotherapy. The decreased percentage values of metabolic parameters as well as maximum and mean SUV with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined cut-off points were significant prognostic factors for overall survival and progression-free survival in univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Measurement of metabolic decrease of volumetric parameters by interim PET/CT analysis is useful to determine the prognosis of patients with recurrent or metastatic AGC.