Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is effective for long-term management of adenomyosis.

BACKGROUD: Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy combined with intraoperative placement of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS) is a novel conservative surgical procedure for adenomyosis. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of surgery with or without intraoperative placement of LNG-IUS treatment in adenomyosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of adenomyosis patients who received laparoscopic adenomyomectomy from January 2014 to April 2020, finally including 70 patients undergoing surgery-LNG-IUS as group A and 69 patients undegoing surgery only as group B. Risk factors for three-year relapse were analyzed using Cox's multivariate proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: Visual analog scale and Mansfield-Voda-Jorgensen Menstrual Bleeding Scale scores of group A at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were significantly lower than those of group B at the corresponding points (P < .001 for both scales). Individuals in both groups showed statistically significant symptom relief. The recurrence rate in group A was significantly lower than that in group B at 36 months after the surgery (2.94% vs. 32.84%, P < .001). A cox proportional hazard model showed that relapse was significantly associated with coexisting ovarian endometriosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-7.02, P = .015). Patients who received surgery-LNG-IUS had a lower risk of recurrence than those with surgery-alone (aHR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.016-0.31, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Conservative surgery with intraoperative placement of LNG-IUS is effective and well-accepted for long-term therapy with a lower recurrence rate for adenomyosis. Coexistent ovarian endometriosis is a major factor for adenomyosis relapse.

Evaluating resectoscopy and the levonorgestrel intrauterine system for intermenstrual bleeding associated with cesarean scar defects: A retrospective study of treatment outcomes.

AIM: To compare and evaluate the efficacy of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUD) and resectoscopy remodeling procedure for intermenstrual bleeding associated with previous cesarean delivery scar defect (PCDS). METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients with PCDS receiving LNG-IUD (levonorgestrel 20 µg/24 h, N = 33) or resectoscopy remodeling (N = 27). Treatment outcomes were compared over 1, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes in patients with a retroverted or large uterus size, defect size, and local vascularization also were evaluated. RESULTS: At 12 months post-treatment, there were no significant differences between groups in efficacy rate; however, the reduction of intermenstrual bleeding days was higher in the LNG-IUD group than in the resectoscopy group (13.6 vs. 8.5 days, p = 0.015). Within the first year, both groups experienced a reduction in bleeding days, but the decrease was greater in the LNG-IUD group. Individuals exhibiting increased local vascularization at the defect site experienced more favorable outcomes in the LNG-IUD group than the resectoscopy group (p = 0.016), and who responded poorly tended to have a significantly larger uterus in the LNG-IUD group (p = 0.019). No significant differences were observed in treatment outcomes for patients with a retroverted uterus or large defect in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that the LNG-IUD is as effective as resectoscopy in reducing intermenstrual bleeding days associated with PCDS and can be safely applied to patients without recent fertility aspirations. Patients with increased local vascularization observed during hysteroscopy may benefit more from LNG-IUD intervention than resectoscopy.

A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing megestrol acetate to levonorgestrel-intrauterine system in fertility sparing treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: The objective of the trial was to compare the regression rate of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) in patients treated with megestrol acetate (MA) vs. levonorgestrel-intrauterine device (LNG-IUS). We also aimed to assess the fertility and pregnancy outcomes in these patients. METHODS: The study was a phase II multi-centre randomised controlled trial on the use of MA compared to LNG-IUS in the treatment of AEH conducted from January 2020 to January 2024 in Singapore. Women who were diagnosed with AEH and between 21 and 40 years old were included. The patients were randomised to receive either MA (160 mg orally daily) or LNG-IUS. The primary outcomes assessed were the regression rates at 3 months, 6 months and 9 months of treatment. The secondary outcomes assessed were the side effects, patient acceptability and fertility outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients completed the trial. The overall regression rate was 88.9% by 9 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the 9-month complete regression rate between MA vs. LNG-IUS. There was also no significant difference in side effects and weight change between both arms. Nineteen patients were actively pursuing fertility after complete regression. There were 8 pregnancies achieved, with resultant 4 live births and 4 miscarriages. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms a high regression rate of AH with medical treatment. LNG-IUS is a non-inferior treatment compared to megestrol acetate. Successful pregnancy outcomes can be achieved after regression of AEH. Long-term studies of sufficient sample-size are needed to assess for fertility and pregnancy outcomes, risk of recurrence and long-term risk of malignancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered with the Health Science Authority (HSA) (License No.: CTA1900087) on September 5, 2019: https://eservice.hsa.gov.sg/prism/ct_r/enquiry.do?action=loadSpecificDetail . The trial was registered retrospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05492487) on April 7, 2022: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05492487 .

The use of LNG-IUS-19.5 mg in daily gynecological routine practice in Germany: data from the Kyleena™ Satisfaction Study (KYSS).

PURPOSE: The Kyleena™ Satisfaction Study (KYSS) provided the first data on 19.5 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS-19.5 mg) use in routine clinical practice. Here we report results from the German participants in KYSS. METHODS: This prospective, observational, single-arm cohort study recruited women who independently chose to use LNG-IUS-19.5 mg during routine counseling in Germany. Overall satisfaction and bleeding profile satisfaction, continuation rates, and safety profile were evaluated at 12 months or premature end of observation (EoO). RESULTS: In the German study population, LNG-IUS-19.5 mg placement was attempted in 508 women and successful in 506 women. Mean age was 32.3 years, and 60.0% (n = 305/508) were parous. Placement was considered easy and associated with no more than mild pain, even in younger and nulliparous participants. Of those with satisfaction data available, 87.6% (n = 388/443) were satisfied with LNG-IUS-19.5 mg at 12 months/EoO. Satisfaction was similar for parous (86.9%, n = 238/274) and nulliparous (88.8%, n = 150/169) women, and was independent of age, prior contraceptive method, or reason for choosing LNG-IUS-19.5 mg. Most participants (73.6%, n = 299/406) were also satisfied with their bleeding profile at 12 months/EoO, independent of parity, age, prior contraceptive method, presence of amenorrhea or dysmenorrhea severity. The 12-month continuation rate was 84.1% (n = 427/508). Most discontinuations were due to loss to follow-up (8.5%, n = 43/508) or treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (4.7%, n = 24/508). TEAEs were reported in 12.6% (n = 64) of participants, with 9.3% (n = 47) considered to have an LNG-IUS-19.5 mg-related TEAE. CONCLUSION: Our real-world findings on LNG-IUS-19.5 mg use in German KYSS participants reflected its suitability for a broad population, including young and nulliparous women. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03182140 (date of registration: June 2017).

Comparative effects of different treatments based on the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in endometrial carcinoma and endometrial hyperplasia patients: a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) has been widely used in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC), endometrial hyperplasia without atypical (EH), and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). The purpose of our Network meta-analysis (NMA) is to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments based on the LNG-IUS in patients with EC and EH with or without atypical. METHODS: We examined PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library up to 22 April 2024 to determine studies reporting treatment outcomes in EC and EH patients receiving LNG-IUS therapy, LNG-IUS + metformin (MET), oral progestins (OP), etc. We used EndNote 9 to select studies, Jadad scale and NOS scale to assess quality, stata(16.0) and R (4.3.1) to analysis the data. RESULTS: Overall, 28 studies involving 3752 patients were included in our NMA. As for EH patients, LNG-IUS (RR 1.21; 95% CrI [1.11, 1.34]) and LNG-IUS + MET (RR 323.57; 95% CrI [1.61, 214,223,188.1])] significantly increased CR rate in comparison with OP. Based on SUCRA, LNG-IUS + OP was the best treatment to improve CR(SUCRA = 67.2%) in patients with EC, whereas LNG-IUS + MET was superior in increasing CR (SUCRA = 99.8%) than any other treatments for EH patients. Besides, the ranking based on SUCRA illustrated that LNG-IUS alone was the best choice to raise CR rates (SUCRA = 76.7%) for AEH patients. In head-to-head meta-analysis, OP has a higher progression rate (RR 4, 95% CI 1.89-8.46, p = 0.062; I2 = 71.3%), a higher nausea rate (RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.24-3.01, p = 0.187; I2 = 40.4%) than LNG-IUS in patients with EH. In contrast, LNG-IUS had a irregular vaginal bleeding rates (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.90, p = 0.034; I2 = 77.7%) than OP in EH patients. In addition, as for AEH patients, OP has a higher persistence rate (RR 4.31, 95% CI 1.43-13.00, p = 0.93; I2 = 0.0%) than LNG-IUS. CONCLUSION: According to the NMA, LNG-IUS related studies are feasible for conservative therapy in patients with EC and EH with or without atypical. Therefore, concerning the curative effect, we recommend LNG-IUS-based treatments as the best conservative therapy for EC and EH patients. However, future studies require large sample sizes and more outcomes to further evaluate the differences of treatment selections based on LNG-IUS.

The impact of using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device on the incidence of acne in adolescents and young women.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) use on the incidence of acne in adolescents and young women. METHODS: A narrative review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and SciELO assessing the incidence of acne in adolescents and young women using LNG-IUD (13.5, or 19.5 mg, or 52 mg). Cohort, cross-sectional studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses were included, without a date limit. Studies that didn't evaluate women in the age of interest were excluded. Only articles in English were selected. RESULTS: Nine articles were included in this narrative review. Only clinical trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies were evaluated. Two cross-sectional studies evaluated the incidence of acne in women using any contraceptive methods, with the incidence of acne being 36% in women aged 17 to 47 using LNG-IUD in one study. In another study, acne incidence ranged from 2 to 8% in women using any contraceptive methods, with higher rates in younger women and LNG-IUD users. The incidence of acne varies and participants between 16 to 35 years were more likely to report new acne or worsening of pre-existing acne. In a prospective cohort study of women between 16 and 24 years, acne was a common adverse effect, with 44% in the first year. CONCLUSION: The data indicate variability in the incidence of acne among LNG-IUD users, with a higher prevalence observed in younger women. Further research should focus on the effects of LNG-IUD on acne in young populations, with rigorous study designs and consideration of previous contraceptive use.

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) is an important tool in the prevention of unplanned pregnancies in adolescents and young women. Acne is a possible adverse effect that could lead to discontinuation of the method.

Improvement of laboratory markers of anaemia in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding with a 19.5-mg intrauterine device: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate improvements in laboratory markers of anaemia (haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum iron, and ferritin) in women with subjective heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) treated with the levonorgestrel 19.5-mg intrauterine device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a pilot study at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campinas, SP, Brazil. We compared anaemia markers in 73 women aged 18-48 years suffering from HMB, one year after placement of the IUD. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 30.0 years (range 24-38); more than half were white, and the mean body mass index (kg/m2) was 27.0. Twenty (27.4%) participants exited the study due to loss to follow-up (n = 12; 16.4%), expulsion (n = 7; 9.6%) and uterine perforation (n = 1; 1.4%). One-year post-IUD placement, amenorrhoea was reported by 10 (13.7%) women. According to intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, the proportion of women with normal haemoglobin levels significantly improved (p = 0.014 in both analyses), as did haematocrit (p < 0.001 in both analyses) and serum iron (p = 0.003 in both analyses) compared to baseline evaluations. The proportion of women with normal ferritin levels also improved (p < 0.001) in both analyses using a cut-off of 15 ng/ml, though no significant difference was observed using a 30 ng/ml cut-off (p = 0.083 in both analyses). CONCLUSION: The levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD effectively improved laboratory markers of anaemia one year after placement in women with HMB.

Our results show that the levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD significantly improved anaemia markers in subjects with subjective HMB one year after insertion. The occurrence of expulsions emerged as a notable concern in this treatment group.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 52 mg versus other long-acting reversible contraceptives for contraception in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Condoms and combined oral contraceptive pills are widely used in Spain with high failure rates. Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) methods offer better efficacy and adherence and reduce unintended pregnancies (UP) compared with short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) versus other LARC for contraception in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model with annual cycles and an eight-year time horizon was developed from the Spanish national healthcare system (NHS) perspective, considering costs for contraceptive method acquisition, health care resources (HCR) and UP. Effectiveness was based on failure and discontinuation rates. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the model's robustness. RESULTS: LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) resulted in lower costs and fewer UP versus LNG-IUS 13.5 mg (Jaydess®), Implant (Implanon®) and Copper IUD. LNG-IUS 52 mg (Levosert®) prevented the same UP events at a higher cost. LNG-IUS 19.5 mg (Kyleena®) was the most effective option, due to a lower discontinuation rate. CONCLUSIONS: LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) is the least costly LARC, driven by lower acquisition costs and reduced HCR utilisation. Increasing LNG-IUS 52 mg (Mirena®) uptake in contraception could generate further cost savings for the Spanish NHS and reduce economic burden of UP.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; Mirena^®) is an effective and cost-saving long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method compared with other similar methods in Spain over an eight-year time horizon, and Kyleena^® was the most effective option.

Usage of the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system in perimenopause.

Levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system have excellent contraceptive efficacy with simultaneous lowering of menstruation's blood loss. It could be used for therapy of endometrial hyperplasia in perimenopause. In position of gestagen part of the hormone replacement therapy it has high control of endometrial proliferation. It is conjoined with the zero increasing of risk of thromboembolic disease in combination with transdermal oestrogen's application.

Transcriptomic identification of differentially expressed genes in Levonorgestrel resistant endometrial cancer cell lines.

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the world and incidence is steadily increasing. The Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) is an alternative conservative treatment for early-stage EC, however, Levonorgestrel (LNG) resistance occurs for 1 in 3 people. This study aimed to present potential LNG resistance mechanisms and identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in EC cell lines. Two LNG resistant cell lines were developed through long term culture in LNG (MFE296R and MFE319R ). Whole transcriptome sequencing was carried out on triplicate RNA samples. EdgeR v3.32.1 was used to identify differentially DEGs. Blast2go V6.0 (BioBam software) was used for functional annotation and analysis of genomic datasets. Protein interactions were investigated using the STRING database, including the identification of genes with high levels of interaction (HUB genes). Select DEGs and HUB genes were validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blot. Fifteen DEGs were identified according to FDR < 0.05 and logFC < 2. Protein analysis identified six HUB genes with a degree of connectivity > 10. Relative mRNA expression of MAOA, MAOB, THRSP, CD80, NDP, LINC01474, DUSP2 and CXCL8 was significantly upregulated in both LNGR cell lines. Relative protein expression of GNAO1 and MAOA were significantly upregulated in both LNGR cell lines. This research identified novel markers of resistance in LNGR cell lines. We discussed potential mechanisms of LNG resistance including dedifferentiation and immunostimulation. The next step for this research is to validate these findings further in both translational and clinical settings.

Comparison of the effect of levonorgestrel-intrauterine system with or without oral megestrol acetate on fertility-preserving treatment in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia: A prospective, open-label, randomized controlled phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of levonorgestrel-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with or without oral megestrol acetate (MA) versus MA alone on fertility-preserving treatment in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). METHODS: This was a single-center phase II study with an open-label, randomized, controlled trial conducted between July 2017 and June 2020 at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. A total of 180 patients (18-45 years) with primary AEH were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to the MA (N = 60), LNG-IUS (N = 60), or MA + LNG-IUS (N = 60) groups, in which the patients received MA (160 mg orally daily), LNG-IUS, or MA + LNG-IUS (MA 160 mg orally daily plus LNG-IUS), respectively. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate at 16 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoints were CR rate at 32 weeks of treatment, adverse events, and recurrence and pregnancy rates. All analyses were conducted in a modified intention to treat (ITT) population who underwent randomization and in whom treatment was initiated. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 16-week CR rates (with 95% confidence interval) were 19.2% (9.0-29.4%) in the MA group, 35.0% (22.8-47.2%) in the LNG-IUS group, and 29.4% (17.2-41.6%) in the MA + LNG-IUS groups. Side effects such as weight gain, increased nocturnal urine, night sweat, insomnia and edema face seemed to occur less frequently in LNG-IUS group compared with MA group. No difference was found among groups regarding second endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: LNG-IUS or LNG-IUS plus MA did not show significant therapeutic benefit compared with MA alone. Further studies including sufficient sample-size are needed to validate these findings due to the underpowered design of this trial. FUNDING: This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No 2019YFC1005200 and 2019YFC1005204), Shanghai Medical Centre of Key Programs for Female Reproductive Diseases (Grant No. 2017ZZ010616), Shanghai sailing program (Grant No. 19YF1404200), and Shen Kang clinical project (SHDC22021219). Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT03241888. https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT03241888?term=NCT03241888&draw=2&rank=1.

Comparing levonorgestrel intrauterine system with hysteroscopic niche resection in women with postmenstrual spotting related to a niche in the uterine cesarean scar: a randomized, open-label, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postmenstrual spotting and chronic pelvic pain after cesarean delivery are associated with the presence of niches. Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (52 mg) and hysteroscopic niche resection have been shown to relieve niche-related symptoms at 6 months after the intervention. OBJECTIVE: This trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system with that of hysteroscopic niche resection in reducing niche-related postmenstrual spotting. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted at a medical center in Shanghai, China. Women with symptoms of postmenstrual spotting after cesarean delivery, with a niche depth of at least 2 mm and residual myometrium of at least 2.2 mm on magnetic resonance imaging, and no intention to conceive within the next year were randomly assigned to receive treatment with 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system or hysteroscopic niche resection. The primary outcome was the reduction in postmenstrual spotting at 6 months after randomization, defined as the percentage of women with a reduction of at least 50% in spotting days relative to baseline. Efficacy and safety were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Between September 2019 and January 2022, 208 women were randomized into the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group (N=104) or the hysteroscopic niche resection group (N=104). At the 6-month follow-up, a 50% reduction in spotting had occurred in 78.4% (80/102) of women in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group and in 73.1% (76/104) of women in the hysteroscopic niche resection group (relative risk, 1.07 [95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.25]; P=.370). Spotting decreased over time (Ptrend=.001), with a stronger reduction observed in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group (P=.001). There was also a significant interaction between time and treatment (P=.007). From 9 months onward, a more significant reduction in spotting was observed in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group than in the hysteroscopic niche resection group (9 months, 89.2% vs 72.1%; relative risk, 1.24 [95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.42]; 12 months, 90.2% vs 70.2%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.48]). Moreover, compared with the hysteroscopic niche resection group, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group had significantly fewer postmenstrual spotting days and total bleeding days from 6 months onward (all P<.001), and less pelvic pain from 3 months onward (all P<.010). No intervention-related complications were reported in any group. During follow-up, 11 (10.8%) women reported hormone-related side effects, and 2 women (2.0%) in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group had spontaneous partial expulsion. Meanwhile, 3 unintended pregnancies were reported in the hysteroscopic niche resection group. CONCLUSION: In women with niche-related postmenstrual spotting, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was not more effective than hysteroscopic niche resection in reducing the number of spotting days by at least 50% at 6 months. However, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was superior in reducing spotting from 9 months onward, and it reduced the absolute number of spotting days from 6 months onward and pelvic pain from 3 months onward.

A randomized trial comparing the 52-mg levonorgestrel system with combination oral contraceptives for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.

BACKGROUND: The levonorgestrel intrauterine system and combined oral contraceptives are the 2 most commonly used nonsurgical treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding in the United States. However, there are limited data on their relative effectiveness and on their impact on bleeding-specific quality of life. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system with that of combined oral contraceptives for improving quality of life among individuals who self-report heavy menstrual bleeding. We hypothesized that the levonorgestrel intrauterine system would be more effective than combined oral contraceptives at 6 and 12 months after treatment. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a pragmatic randomized trial of individuals who self-reported heavy menstrual bleeding. Individuals were eligible if they did not have contraindications to either the levonorgestrel intrauterine system or combined oral contraceptives and were determined to have a nonstructural cause of heavy menstrual bleeding. Eligible and consenting participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system or a monophasic 30- or 35-µg ethinyl estradiol-containing combined oral contraceptive. The main outcome was mean change in bleeding-related quality of life, measured by the 20-question Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (score range, 0-75) at 6 and 12 months. Differences in group means and confidence intervals for the Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire score were computed by multivariable linear mixed-effects regression; 24 participants per group were needed to detect a 10-point difference in change in mean Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire score between individuals treated with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and those treated with combined oral contraceptives at each follow-up time point. RESULTS: A total of 62 individuals were randomly assigned to treatment (n=29 allocated to levonorgestrel intrauterine system and n=33 allocated to combined oral contraceptives) and included in the intention-to-treat analyses; 19 of 29 received the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and 31 of 33 received combined oral contraceptives. Eleven percent identified as Black or African American and 44% identified as Hispanic or Latina. Participant characteristics were similar among study groups. Bleeding-related quality of life increased in both study arms, as reflected by a significant decrease in Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire scores beginning at 6-week follow-up. In the main intention-to-treat analyses (n=62), there were no differences in mean change in Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire scores at 6 months (difference=-2.5; 95% confidence interval, -10.0 to +5.0) or 12 months (difference=-1.1; 95% confidence interval, -8.7 to +6.5). Findings were similar in the subsets of participants with any follow-up visits (n=52) and who completed all follow-up visits (n=42). In the per-protocol analyses (n=47), a significantly greater decrease in Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire score was observed in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system arm at 6 months after treatment (difference=-7.0; 95% confidence interval, -13.8 to -0.2) but not at 12 months (difference=-4.8; 95% confidence interval, -11.8 to 2.3) compared with the combined oral contraceptive arm. CONCLUSION: No differences in change of bleeding-related quality of life were observed between the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and combined oral contraceptives at 6 or 12 months. Patients should be counseled that the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and combined oral contraceptives are both effective options for improving bleeding-related quality of life.

The effect of a combined indomethacin and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on short-term postplacement bleeding profile: a randomized proof-of-concept trial.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible contraceptives, including hormonal levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems, are the most effective methods of reversible contraception. However, unfavorable bleeding, particularly during the first months of use, is one of the most important reasons for discontinuation or avoidance. Minimizing this as early as possible would be highly beneficial. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis are known to reduce bleeding and pain at time of menses. A levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system has been developed with an additional reservoir containing indomethacin, designed to be released during the initial postplacement period. OBJECTIVE: This proof-of-concept study aimed to establish whether the addition of indomethacin to the currently available levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (average in vivo levonorgestrel release rate of 8 µg/24 h during the first year of use) reduces the number of bleeding and spotting days during the first 90 days of use compared with the unmodified system. The dose-finding analysis included 3 doses of indomethacin-low (6.5 mg), middle (12.5 mg), and high (15.4 mg)-to determine the ideal dose of indomethacin to reduce bleeding and spotting days with minimal side-effects. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized, controlled phase II trial conducted between June 2018 and June 2019 at 6 centers in Europe. Three indomethacin dose-ranging treatment groups (low-, middle-, and high-dose indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) were compared with the unmodified levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system group, with participants randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the number of uterine bleeding and spotting days over a 90-day reference (treatment) period. Secondary outcomes were the number of women showing endometrial histology expected for intrauterine levonorgestrel application and the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events. Point estimates and 2-sided 90% credible intervals were calculated for mean and median differences between treatment groups and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin. Point and interval estimates were determined using a Bayesian analysis. RESULTS: A total of 174 healthy, premenopausal women, aged 18 to 45 years, were randomized, with 160 women eligible for the per-protocol analysis set. Fewer bleeding and spotting days were observed in the 90-day reference period for the 3 indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system dose groups than for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin group. The largest reduction in bleeding and spotting days was achieved with low-dose indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, which demonstrated a point estimate difference of -32% (90% credible interval, -45% to -19%) compared with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin. Differences for high- and middle-dose indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system groups relative to levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin were -19% and -16%, respectively. Overall, 97 women (58.1%) experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event considered related to the study drug, with similar incidence across all treatment groups including the unmodified levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. These were all mild or moderate in intensity, with 6 leading to discontinuation. Endometrial biopsy findings were consistent with effects expected for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. CONCLUSION: All 3 doses of indomethacin substantially reduced the number of bleeding and spotting days in the first 90 days after placement of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, thus providing proof of concept. Adding indomethacin to the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system can reduce the number of bleeding and spotting days in the initial 90 days postplacement, without affecting the safety profile, and potentially improving patient acceptability and satisfaction.

Clinical evaluation of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation combined with mifepristone and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system to treat symptomatic adenomyosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the combination of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), mifepristone, and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in adenomyosis treatment. METHODS: HIFU treatment was performed in 123 patients with symptomatic adenomyosis who had refused treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) at Anyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital. In the control group, 34 patients were treated with HIFU alone, 29 patients with HIFU combined with mifepristone, 10 patients with HIFU combined with LNG-IUS. In the study group, 50 patients were treated with HIFU combined with mifepristone and LNG-IUS. RESULTS: Uterine volume, dysmenorrhea pain score, menstruation volume score, and serum CA125 level were significantly lower after treatment with HIFU combined with mifepristone and LNG-IUS than before treatment (p < .05). Moreover, hemoglobin level was significantly higher than that before treatment (p < .05). After 24 months, the efficacy of HIFU combined with mifepristone and LNG-IUS was significantly higher than that of HIFU alone, HIFU combined with mifepristone or HIFU with LNG-IUS (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy of HIFU, mifepristone, and LNG-IUS is an effective, safe, and inexpensive treatment for patients with symptomatic adenomyosis. This combination therapy demonstrates superior efficacy to treatment with HIFU alone, HIFU combined with mifepristone, and HIFU combined with LNG-IUS.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system effects on metabolic variables in PCOS.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine and compare the reproductive hormone level and metabolic of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) when treated with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). OBJECTIVES: Sixty-four women with PCOS (Group A) and sixty-six healthy women inserted with a LNG-IUS for conception (Group B) were recruited from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Jinhua Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine. METHOD: We compared the general characteristics of the cases between the two groups, including age, body mass index (BMI), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), abdominal circumference (AC) and waist circumference (WC). Each patient was evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) to determine the number of oocytes and ovarian volume, and the intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery was measured on an ECG image from the left common carotid artery before and six months, 12 months and 24 months after patients were inserted with the LNG-IUS. Hormone levels (follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, serum estradiol and total testosterone), serum insulin, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglyceride (TG), were evaluated before and six months, 12 months and 24 months after patients were inserted with an LNG-IUS. The levels of testosterone (T) in the non-HA (hyperandrogenemia) group and HA group in PCOS group were compared with the baseline. We also compared cases without insulin resistance in the PCOS group with their baseline. RESULTS: Prior to LNG-IUS insertion, the PCOS group had significantly higher total testosterone levels (p < 0.05), lower HDL levels (p < 0.05), and a greater ovarian volume (p < 0.05) than the control group. Compared to baseline values, there was a significant increase in fasting glycemia at six months after LNG-IUS insertion (p < 0.05). Mean ovarian volume was significantly smaller than the volume prior to LNG-IUS insertion (p < 0.05); LDL and TC were significantly reduced when compared to baseline evaluation in the PCOS group. The remaining variables did not differ significantly during the 24 months follow-up period. The control group did not show any significant changes when compared to the period before LNG-IUS insertion. When the groups were compared after the 24-month follow-up, WC, AC, FSH, LH, T, SHBG, HDL, FINs, FAI and ovarian volume were significantly different when compared between the two groups (p < 0.05) . CONCLUSION: The LNG-IUS is an effective and safe non-surgical device and the use of this system for 24 months did not result in significant changes in the clinical and metabolic variables in women with PCOS and healthy control females.

Influence of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The intention of this systematic review was to analyze the literature on breast cancer (BC) and the use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). METHODS: The literature was searched in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.com and included search terms related to breast cancer and LNG-IUS. After elimination of duplicates, 326 studies could be identified and were assessed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the end, 10 studies met the defined criteria and were included in the systematic review. RESULTS: 6 out of the 10 selected studies were cohort studies, three were case-control studies and one a systematic review/meta-analysis. 6 found a positive association between BC and the use of LNG-IUS. One study only found an increased risk for invasive BC in the subgroup of women aged 40-45 years. In contrast, three studies showed no indication of a higher BC risk. CONCLUSION: The results imply an increased BC risk in LNG-IUS users, especially in postmenopausal women and with longer duration of use. Positive effects of the LNG-IUS such as reduced risks for other hormonal cancers have been observed, were, however, not focus of this systematic review. The heterogeneity of the analyzed studies and vast number of confounding factors call for further investigations in this issue. Patients should be advised according to their individual risk profile and hormone-free alternatives may be considered for women with a history of BC.

User satisfaction with an intrauterine system containing 52 mg levonorgestrel: a Portuguese study.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise patient satisfaction 6 and 12 months after insertion of a 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in Portuguese women. STUDY DESIGN: A non-interventional and prospective study was conducted in Portuguese women of reproductive age who had Levosert® inserted. Two questionnaires (administered 6 and 12 months after 52 mg LNG-IUS insertion) were used to collect information on the patients' menstrual pattern, discontinuation rate, and satisfaction rate with Levosert®. RESULTS: A total of 102 women were enrolled, of which only 94 (92.2%) completed the study. Seven participants discontinued the use of the 52 mg LNG-IUS. At 6 and 12 months, 90.7% and 90.4% of participants, respectively, were either satisfied or very satisfied with the 52 mg LNG-IUS. At 6 and 12 months, 73.2% and 72.3% of participants, respectively, indicated that they were very likely to recommend the 52 mg LNG-IUS to a friend or family member. Most women (92.2%) continued to use the 52 mg LNG-IUS for the first year. The percentage of women who were 'much more satisfied' with Levosert® than with their previous contraceptive methods was 55.9% and 57.8% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, per questionnaire assessment. Satisfaction was associated with age (p = 0.004), amenorrhoea (p < 0.003) and absence of dysmenorrhoea (p = 0.003), but not with parity (p = 0.922). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the continuation and satisfaction rates with Levosert® were very high, and that this system is well accepted among Portuguese women. Patient satisfaction was driven by a favourable bleeding pattern and absence of dysmenorrhoea.

Satisfaction with the 52 mg levonorgestrel­releasing intrauterine system was high among Portuguese women. Patient satisfaction was mainly driven by a favourable bleeding pattern and absence of dysmenorrhoea.

Levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system efficacy and safety through 8 years of use.

BACKGROUND: Extending hormonal intrauterine system duration will allow users to have less need for procedures to provide long-term contraception. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system during years 7 and 8 of use. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1751 nulliparous and multiparous participants aged 16 to 45 years enrolled in a phase 3, multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of the Liletta levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system for up to 10 years. Participants aged 36 to 45 years at enrollment underwent safety evaluation only. After the first year, we evaluated participants every 6 months for intrauterine system location confirmation and urine pregnancy testing at each visit. We assessed the Pearl Indices in years 7 and 8 and the life-table analysis for cumulative pregnancy rates through 8 years of use. For the primary efficacy analyses, all participants aged 16 to 35 years at enrollment were included through year 6; years 7 and 8 included only users aged ≤39 years at the start of each use year. Safety outcomes were assessed in all participants regardless of duration of use. We assessed amenorrhea rates, defined as no bleeding or spotting in the 90 days before the end of the year. RESULTS: After intrauterine system placement, we followed 1568 participants aged 16 to 35 years and 146 participants aged 36 to 45 years. The 16- to 35-year-old participants included 986 (57.5%) nulliparous and 433 (25.3%) obese users. Overall, 569 participants started year 7, 478 completed year 7 (380 aged ≤39 years at beginning of year) and 343 completed year 8 (257 aged ≤39 years at beginning of year); 77 completed 10 years of use. Eleven pregnancies occurred over 8 years, 7 (64%) of which were ectopic. Two pregnancies occurred in year 7 (Pearl Index, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-1.78), 1 in a participant with implantation 4 days after a desired removal; no pregnancies occurred in year 8. The cumulative life-table pregnancy rate in the primary efficacy population through year 8 was 1.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-2.51); without the postremoval pregnancy, the rate was 1.09 (95% confidence interval, 0.56-2.13). Two perforations (0.1%) occurred, none noted after year 1. Expulsion occurred in 71 (4.1%) participants overall, with 3 in year 7 and 2 in year 8. Pelvic infection was diagnosed in 16 (0.9%) participants during intrauterine system use, 1 each in years 7 and 8. Only 44 (2.6%) participants overall discontinued because of bleeding complaints (4 total in years 7 and 8) with rates per year of 0.1% to 0.5% for years 3 to 8. Amenorrhea rates were 39% at both years 7 and 8. CONCLUSION: The levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system is highly effective over 8 years of use and has an excellent extended safety profile. This report details the longest period of efficacy and safety data for continuous use of a levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system for contraception.

Contraceptive efficacy and safety of the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system for up to 8 years: findings from the Mirena Extension Trial.

BACKGROUND: The 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is an established, long-acting contraceptive option with approved use for up to 7 years. OBJECTIVE: The Mirena Extension Trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system during extended use beyond 5 and up to 8 years. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, single-arm study in the United States, enrolling existing users of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, aged 18 to 35 years, who have had the system for 4.5 to 5 years. We assessed the contraceptive efficacy (Pearl Index) and cumulative failure rate (using the Kaplan-Meier method) of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system during extended use. We also evaluated bleeding outcomes and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 362 participants starting year 6, 243 entered and 223 completed 8 years of 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use. Just more than half the participants were parous. The mean (standard deviation) age was 29.2 (±2.9) years, and all participants were aged ≤36 years at the end of year 8. Two pregnancies occurred, both with the device in situ. The year 6 pregnancy was of undetermined location and resolved spontaneously. The pregnancy in year 7 was ectopic and resolved with methotrexate treatment. In both cases, the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was removed and the participants left the trial. For years 6 to 8, the 3-year Pearl Index (95% confidence interval) was 0.28 (0.03-1.00) with a 3-year cumulative failure rate of 0.68% (0.17-2.71). Pearl Indexes for years 6, 7, and 8 were 0.34 (0.01-1.88), 0.40 (0.01-2.25), and 0.00 (0.00-1.90), respectively. The 3-year (years 6-8) ectopic pregnancy Pearl Index was 0.14 (0.00-0.77). We found treatment-emergent adverse events in 249 of 362 participants (68.8%), with 65 (18.0%) events considered to be related to the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. The discontinuation rate was 38.4% (139/362), most commonly because of desire for pregnancy (12.2%, 44/362). During extended use beyond 5 years and up to 8 years, participants reported a decrease in the mean number of bleeding or spotting days with approximately half of the women experiencing amenorrhea or infrequent bleeding. We did not enroll a sufficient number of women using the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for contraception and heavy menstrual bleeding to assess extended use for that indication. At the end of year 8, most (98.7%, 220/223) of the participants who completed the study remained satisfied with the continued use of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Of the 31 women who discontinued early because of desire for pregnancy with evaluable data for return-to-fertility analysis, 24 reported a posttreatment pregnancy within 1 year, giving a 12-month return-to-fertility rate of 77.4%. CONCLUSION: The 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, initially approved for 5 years, maintains high contraceptive efficacy, user satisfaction, and a favorable safety profile through 8 years of use. Participants reported 26 posttreatment pregnancies in total, of which 24 occurred in women who had discontinued the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system because of a desire for pregnancy. Of note, among women who elected to continue use through 8 years, bleeding patterns remained highly favorable. These findings support continued 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use for up to 8 years in women who wish to continue treatment.