Periorbital skin cancers subjected to mTHPC-photodynamic therapy: A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a relatively new method of treating skin cancers. This prospective study highlights the use of PDT in the management of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and T1N0 cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) involving the periorbital area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surface illumination PDT was offered under local anaesthesia. mTHPC was administered intravenously. A single-channel 652 nm diode laser was used for illumination, and light was delivered at 20 J/cm2 per site. Lesion response evaluation was carried out according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST). RESULTS: After the first round of treatment, all cutaneous T1N0 SCC patients had complete response (CR) and continued to be in remission until last clinic review. For BCC patients, 12/14 patients had CR. The two remaining patients underwent a second round of treatment and also achieved a CR. All BCC patients were in remission at the last clinic review. Using visual analogue scale (VAS), 15 patients reported that this treatment gave them "excellent" cosmetic outcome (VAS 9-10). CONCLUSION: Photodynamic therapy achieved high efficacy in the treatment of periorbital BCCs and cutaneous SCCs with greatly reduced morbidity and disfigurement.

Evaluation for Synergistic Effects by Combinations of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) with Temoporfin (mTHPC) and Pt(II) Complexes Carboplatin, Cisplatin or Oxaliplatin in a Set of Five Human Cancer Cell Lines.

The platinum(II) complexes carboplatin (CBDCA), cisplatin (CDDP) and oxaliplatin (1-OHP) are used as anticancer drugs in a large number of tumour chemotherapy regimens. Many attempts have been made to combine Pt(II)-based chemotherapy with alternative treatment strategies. One such alternative anticancer approach is known as photodynamic therapy (PDT), where a non-toxic photosensitizer (PS) produces oxidative stress via the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) after local illumination of the affected tissue. A very promising PS is 5,10,15,20-tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC, Temoporfin), which is approved for the treatment of head and neck cancer in Europe. In the present study, a combination of mTHPC-mediated PDT and either CBDCA, CDDP, or 1-OHP was applied to five human cancer cell lines from different tumour origins. Cytotoxicity was determined by the MTT assay and synergistic effects on cytotoxicity were evaluated by calculation of Combination Indices (CI). Synergy was identified in some of the combinations, for example, with 1-OHP in three of the tested cell lines but antagonism was also observed for a number of combinations in certain cell lines. In cases of synergy, elevated ROS levels were observed after combination but apoptosis induction was not necessarily increased compared to a treatment with a single compound. Cell cycle analysis revealed a formation of apoptotic subG1 populations and S phase as well as G2/M phase arrests after combination. In conclusion, pre-treatment with mTHPC-PDT has the potential to sensitize some types of tumour cells towards Pt(II) complexes, in particular 1-OHP but synergy is highly dependent on the type of cancer.

Lipid nanoemulsions and liposomes improve photodynamic treatment efficacy and tolerance in CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) as promising alternative to conventional cancer treatments works by irradiation of a photosensitizer (PS) with light, which creates reactive oxygen species and singlet oxygen (1O2), that damage the tumor. However, a routine use is hindered by the PS's poor water solubility and extended cutaneous photosensitivity of patients after treatment. In our study we sought to overcome these limitations by encapsulation of the PS m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) into a biocompatible nanoemulsion (Lipidots). RESULTS: In CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice we compared the Lipidots to the existing liposomal mTHPC nanoformulation Foslip and the approved mTHPC formulation Foscan. We established biodistribution profiles via fluorescence measurements in vivo and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. All formulations accumulated in the tumors and we could determine the optimum treatment time point for each substance (8 h for mTHPC, 24 h for Foslip and 72 h for the Lipidots). We used two different light doses (10  and 20 J/cm2) and evaluated immediate PDT effects 48 h after treatment and long term effects 14 days later. We also analyzed tumors by histological analysis and performing reverse transcription real-time PCR with RNA extracts. Concerning tumor destruction Foslip was superior to Lipidots and Foscan while with regard to tolerance and side effects Lipidots were giving the best results. CONCLUSIONS: We could demonstrate in our study that nanoformulations are superior to the free PS mTHPC. The development of a potent nanoformulation is of major importance because the free PS is related to several issues such as poor bioavailability, solubility and increased photosensibility of patients. We could show in this study that Foslip is very potent in destroying the tumors itself. However, because the Lipidots' biocompatibility is outstanding and superior to the liposomes we plan to carry out further investigations and protocol optimization. Both nanoformulations show great potential to revolutionize PDT in the future.

Photoinduced effects of m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin loaded lipid nanoemulsions on multicellular tumor spheroids.

BACKGROUND: Photosensitizers are used in photodynamic therapy (PDT) to destruct tumor cells, however, their limited solubility and specificity hampers routine use, which may be overcome by encapsulation. Several promising novel nanoparticulate drug carriers including liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, metallic nanoparticles and lipid nanocomposites have been developed. However, many of them contain components that would not meet safety standards of regulatory bodies and due to difficulties of the manufacturing processes, reproducibility and scale up procedures these drugs may eventually not reach the clinics. Recently, we have designed a novel lipid nanostructured carrier, namely Lipidots, consisting of nontoxic and FDA approved ingredients as promising vehicle for the approved photosensitizer m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC). RESULTS: In this study we tested Lipidots of two different sizes (50 and 120 nm) and assessed their photodynamic potential in 3-dimensional multicellular cancer spheroids. Microscopically, the intracellular accumulation kinetics of mTHPC were retarded after encapsulation. However, after activation mTHPC entrapped into 50 nm particles destroyed cancer spheroids as efficiently as the free drug. Cell death and gene expression studies provide evidence that encapsulation may lead to different cell killing modes in PDT. CONCLUSIONS: Since ATP viability assays showed that the carriers were nontoxic and that encapsulation reduced dark toxicity of mTHPC we conclude that our 50 nm photosensitizer carriers may be beneficial for clinical PDT applications.

mTHPC mediated, systemic photodynamic therapy (PDT) for nonmelanoma skin cancers: Case and literature review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with multiple nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), like immunosuppressed or nevoid basal cell carcinomas, offer a therapeutic challenge. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using the systemic photosensitizer meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) has the ability to treat multiple NMSCs up to a depth of 10 mm in a single session. These unique properties offer an attractive alternative to regular therapies (e.g., surgery or radiation) to these patients. STUDY DESIGN: A systemic search was carried out that focused on the main clinical studies using mTHPC-PDT on NMSCs in humans. This review describes some of the basic principles of the treatment, the most effective treatment parameters as well as its possible adverse outcomes, which is illustrated with a short description of our own experiences using this treatment modality on four patients with multiple NMSCs. RESULTS: To date, only four clinical studies have been published. It was demonstrated that mTHPC-PDT could be highly effective. On illuminating 1-2 days after drug administration, plasma drug levels were high and the tumor clearance rates were high (up to 100%), with relative few side effects and excellent cosmetic and functional outcomes. These results were obtained with a relatively low, patient friendly photosensitizer dose (0.04-0.05 mg/kg) as skin photosensitivity was shorter after the procedure. Although the patients personally experienced consistently good cure rates, the healing times varied greatly between anatomical areas. The head and neck areas heal well with good cosmesis, while the lower leg and foot areas show delayed, at times compromised, healing with scarring. CONCLUSIONS: Although mTHPC-PDT is described in the literature as an interesting and promising therapeutic option, especially for multiple NMSCs, a randomized clinical trial is lacking and personal experiences warrant too much skepticism. With the recent introduction of the hedgehog pathway inhibitor vismodegib, mTHPC-PDT seems to be less suitable as a first line of treatment; it should be considered as a last resort therapy.

Photochemical internalization (PCI)-mediated enhancement of bleomycin cytotoxicity by liposomal mTHPC formulations in human head and neck cancer cells.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with photosensitizers that locate in endocytic vesicles of cancer cells can be exploited to promote the intracellular release of anticancer drugs entrapped in endolysosomal vesicles. This new approach is commonly referred to as Photochemical Internalization (PCI). Here we report on the PCI effects of three different formulations (Foscan, Foslip, and Fospeg) of the clinically approved photosensitizer, meta-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorin (mTHPC) on the anticancer drug bleomycin (BLM) in the head and neck cancer cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Uptake and localization of Foscan, Foslip, and Fospeg in head and neck cancer cells were evaluated by fluorescence spectrophotometry and fluorescence microscopy. Photodynamic efficacy of Foscan, Foslip, and Fospeg were compared with cell proliferation assay. Moreover, PCI effects of Foscan, Foslip, and Fospeg on BLM were compared using protocols in which PDT was applied after or before BLM treatment. RESULTS: Cellular uptake of Foscan, Foslip, and Fospeg increased in a dose-dependent fashion with consistent higher uptakes of Foslip and Fospeg than Foscan. Fluorescence microscopy showed diffuse intracellular localization pattern for Foscan, Foslip, and Fospeg similar to that of a specific ER probe. However, the subcellular localization pattern of the Rhodamine-labelled same type of pegylated liposomes as Fospeg was similar to that of a specific endolysosomal probe, suggesting that Fospeg uptake appeared to initially proceed via endolysosomal trafficking. Foscan, Foslip, and Fospeg showed no apparent PCI-mediated cytotoxicity when PDT was performed after BLM treatment. However, significantly increased cytotoxicity of BLM (P < 0.05) was observed for both Foslip and Fospeg when PDT was performed before BLM treatment. The observed differences of PCI-mediated cytotoxicity between these two timing protocols appears to be related to the differential intracellular trafficking and localization of Foscan, Foslip, and Fospeg. CONCLUSION: Liposomal formulations of mTHPC may be candidates for developing mTHPC-based PCI protocols to enhance the efficacy of anticancer drugs entrapped in endolysosomal vesicles.

Suppression of tumour growth from transplanted astrocytoma cells transfected with luciferase in mice by bioluminescence mediated, systemic, photodynamic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Grade 4 astrocytomas are usually incurable due to their diffusely infiltrative nature. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising therapeutic option, but external light delivery is impractical when cancer cells infiltrate unknown areas of normal brain. Hence the search for endogenous sources to generate light at cancer cells. In vitro, astrocytoma cells, transfected with firefly luciferase, can be killed by bioluminescence-mediated PDT (bPDT). This study asks if bPDT can suppress tumour growth In vivo, when all components of treatment are administered systemically. METHODS: Transfected astrocytoma cells were injected subcutaneously or intra-cranially in athymic CD1 nu/nu mice. bPDT required ip bolus of mTHPC (photosensitiser) and delivery of the d-luciferin substrate over 7 days via an implanted osmotic pump. Control animals had no treatment, photosensitiser only or d-luciferin only. For subcutaneous tumours, size and BLI (light emitted after d-luciferin bolus) were measured before and every 2 days after PDT. For intracranial tumours, monitoring was weekly BLI. RESULTS: For subcutaneous tumours, there was significant suppression of the tumour growth rate (P<0.05), and absolute tumour size (P<0.01) after bPDT. Proliferation of subcutaneous and intracranial tumours (monitored by BrdU uptake) was significantly reduced in treated mice. (P<0.001) CONCLUSIONS: This study reports bPDT suppression of tumour growth from luciferase transfected astrocytoma cells with all components of treatment given systemically, as required for effective management of recurrent astrocytomas in unknown sites. However, research on systemic bPDT is needed to establish whether effects on non-transfected tumours can be achieved without any unacceptable effects on normal tissues.

Identification of Blood Transport Proteins to Carry Temoporfin: A Domino Approach from Virtual Screening to Synthesis and In Vitro PDT Testing.

Temoporfin (mTHPC) is one of the most promising photosensitizers used in photodynamic therapy (PDT). Despite its clinical use, the lipophilic character of mTHPC still hampers the full exploitation of its potential. Low solubility in water, high tendency to aggregate, and low biocompatibility are the main limitations because they cause poor stability in physiological environments, dark toxicity, and ultimately reduce the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Applying a reverse docking approach, here, we identified a number of blood transport proteins able to bind and disperse monomolecularly mTHPC, namely apohemoglobin, apomyoglobin, hemopexin, and afamin. We validated the computational results synthesizing the mTHPC-apomyoglobin complex (mTHPC@apoMb) and demonstrated that the protein monodisperses mTHPC in a physiological environment. The mTHPC@apoMb complex preserves the imaging properties of the molecule and improves its ability to produce ROS via both type I and type II mechanisms. The effectiveness of photodynamic treatment using the mTHPC@apoMb complex was then demonstrated in vitro. Blood transport proteins can be used as molecular "Trojan horses" in cancer cells by conferring mTHPC (i) water solubility, (ii) monodispersity, and (iii) biocompatibility, ultimately bypassing the current limitations of mTHPC.

Bioluminescence-activated photodynamic therapy for luciferase transfected, grade 4 astrocytoma cells in vitro.

BACKGROUND: . Grade 4 astrocytoma is incurable due to the diffusely infiltrative nature of the disease. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising therapeutic option, but external light delivery is not feasible when cancer cells infiltrate unknown areas of normal brain. Hence the search for endogenous sources such as bioluminescence that can generate light at cancer cells. This requires a substrate (a luciferin) and an enabling enzyme (a luciferase), neither seen in mammalian cells. METHODS: . Preliminary studies confirmed that U87 cells (derived from a human grade 4 astrocytoma) could be killed by conventional PDT using the photosensitizers hypericin or mTHPC. U87 cells were then transfected with firefly and other luciferases and light generating cell lines (U87-luc, U87-hRluc, U87-CBG68luc) identified using the appropriate substrate. Reagent doses and conditions were optimized and U87-luc cells incubated with hypericin or mTHPC with d-luciferin added to initiate bioluminescence activated PDT (bPDT). Cell survival was assessed by MTT assay, haemocytometry and growth assay. Control groups included U87-luc cells with no added active reagents, substrate only, photosensitizer only and non-transfected U87 cells. Results were expressed as a percentage of surviving cells compared with untreated U87-luc controls. RESULTS: . There was no bPDT effect on non-transfected cells. The mean survival of treated transfected cells was 36%, (P<0.001) using hypericin and 35% (P<0.001) using mTHPC, compared with untreated U87-luc cells. bPDT effects were suppressed by the anti-oxidant, lycopene. CONCLUSIONS: . bPDT can kill Grade 4 astrocytoma cells transfected with luciferase in vitro. This justifies progression to in vivo studies.

Quality of life following photodynamic therapy for head and neck pathologies: An exploratory study.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare related quality of life (QoL) is defined as the impact one's level of health and wellbeing has on a number of domains, including physical, mental, spiritual and social functions. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a cancer treatment modality, is increasingly used to treat or palliate head and neck pathologies. Due to the complex nature of this area of the body, both the pathology and the treatment of it can severely affect the quality of life. Thus far, no questionnaire has been developed which focuses on quality-of-life post-PDT of head and neck pathologies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have developed the University College London Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients undergoing PDT in the Head and Neck, using meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC) as the photosensitiser. This was modified from the University of Washington quality of life (UW-QOL) questionnaire. Thirty-eight patients who received mTHPC-PDT for various head and neck pathologies completed the questionnaire, with a mean follow-up of 56 days. RESULTS: All patients reported improved QoL following mTHPC-PDT. The main problem that was reported was post-PDT pain, which is a common side effect. Visual symptoms, breathing, speaking and swallowing problems improved significantly in the 4th week following treatment and significant improvement in activities of daily living, social life, mood and anxiety were reported in the subsequent weeks. CONCLUSIONS: mTHPC-PDT confers improvement in QoL score in selected head and neck cancer patients with figures comparable to other treatment modalities. This exploratory study demonstrated patterns of QoL outcome. Further work needs to be done for survey validation and inclusion of a larger cohort which will allow optimal sub-group analysis and help guide further interventions.

Carrying Temoporfin with Human Serum Albumin: A New Perspective for Photodynamic Application in Head and Neck Cancer.

Temoporfin (mTHPC) is approved in Europe for the photodynamic treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Although it has a promising profile, its lipophilic character hampers the full exploitation of its potential due to high tendency of aggregation and a reduced ROS generation that compromise photodynamic therapy (PDT) efficacy. Moreover, for its clinical administration, mTHPC requires the presence of ethanol and propylene glycol as solvents, often causing adverse effects in the site of injection. In this paper we explored the efficiency of a new mTHPC formulation that uses human serum albumin (HSA) to disperse the photosensitizer in solution (mTHPC@HSA), investigating its anticancer potential in two HNSCC cell lines. Through a comprehensive characterization, we demonstrated that mTHPC@HSA is stable in physiological environment, does not aggregate, and is extremely efficient in PDT performance, due to its high singlet oxygen generation and the high dispersion as monomolecular form in HSA. This is supported by the computational identification of the specific binding pocket of mTHPC in HSA. Moreover, mTHPC@HSA-PDT induces cytotoxicity in both HNSCC cell lines, increasing intracellular ROS generation and the number of γ-H2AX foci, a cellular event involved in the global response to cellular stress. Taken together these results highlight the promising phototoxic profile of the complex, prompting further studies to assess its clinical potential.

In vitro assessment of synergistic effects in combinations of a temoporfin-based photodynamic therapy with glutathione peroxidase 1 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Due to an increased elimination of reactive oxygen species (ROS), in particular hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), overexpression of glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1) can lead to an attenuation of apoptosis and development of resistance in cancer cells, thereby promoting tumor cell survival. Consequently, GPX1 inhibitors have the potential to be used in cancer therapy as they support oxidative stress in cancer cells. Similarly, photodynamic therapy (PDT) induces oxidative stress in cancer cells by the formation of ROS upon illumination. Thus, both methods of treatment might act in synergy when used in combination. METHODS: To investigate this hypothesis, combinations of the known GPX1 inhibitors 9-chloro-6-ethyl-6H-[1,2,3,4,5]pentathiepino[6,7-b]indole (CEPI) or mercaptosuccinic acid (MSA) with PDT induced by the photosensitizer (PS) temoporfin (5,10,15,20-tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin, mTHPC) were studied in vitro. This new combinatory approach was intended to accumulate ROS formed during PDT via blockage of GPX1-catalyzed H2O2 degradation, and thus to enhance PDT-induced phototoxicity. Five human cancer cell lines from tumor origins treatable with PDT were utilized to investigate ROS generation, apoptosis induction, and cell cycle distribution. RESULTS: Synergy was identified with both GPX1 inhibitors, but not in all cell lines. ROS levels were increased after combined treatment with mTHPC and CEPI, but not MSA, in some cell lines, indicating that oxidative stress and ROS accumulation were enhanced by CEPI. Surprisingly, enhanced apoptosis induction was also observed with MSA afterwards, suggesting that other pathways contributed to the initiation of apoptosis. Cell cycle analysis confirmed apoptosis induction via the detection of DNA fragmentation. CONCLUSION: A combination of GPX1 inhibitors with mTHPC-PDT has the potential to generate synergistic effects and to increase overall phototoxicity, but the success of this combination approach was dependent on cancer type, and even antagonistic effects can occur.

Lysosome-targeted photodynamic treatment induces primary keratinocyte differentiation.

Photodynamic therapy is an attractive technique for various skin tumors and non-cancerous skin lesions. However, while the aim of photodynamic therapy is to target and damage only the malignant cells, it unavoidably affects some of the healthy cells surrounding the tumor as well. However, data on the effects of PDT to normal cells are scarce, and the characterization of the pathways activated after the photodamage of normal cells may help to improve clinical photodynamic therapy. In our study, primary human epidermal keratinocytes were used to evaluate photodynamic treatment effects of photosensitizers with different subcellular localization. We compared the response of keratinocytes to lysosomal photodamage induced by phthalocyanines, aluminum phthalocyanine disulfonate (AlPcS2a) or aluminum phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate (AlPcS4), and cellular membrane photodamage by m-tetra(3-hydroxyphenyl)-chlorin (mTHPC). Our data showed that mTHPC-PDT promoted autophagic flux, whereas lysosomal photodamage induced by aluminum phthalocyanines evoked differentiation and apoptosis. Photodamage by AlPcS2a, which is targeted to lysosomal membranes, induced keratinocyte differentiation and apoptosis more efficiently than AlPcS4, which is targeted to lysosomal lumen. Computational analysis of the interplay between these molecular pathways revealed that keratin 10 is the coordinating molecular hub of primary keratinocyte differentiation, apoptosis and autophagy.

mTHPC-Loaded Extracellular Vesicles Significantly Improve mTHPC Diffusion and Photodynamic Activity in Preclinical Models.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), derived from the cell, display a phospholipid bilayer membrane that protects the cargo molecules from degradation and contributes to increasing their stability in the bloodstream and tumor targeting. EVs are interesting in regard to the delivery of photosensitizers (PSs) used in the photodynamic therapy (PDT), as they allow us to overcome the limitations observed with liposomes. In fact, liposomal formulation of meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC) (Foslip®), one of the most potent clinically approved PSs, is rapidly destroyed in circulation, thus decreasing in vivo PDT efficacy. mTHPC-EV uptake was evaluated in vitro in a 3D human colon HT-29 microtumor and in vivo study was performed in HT-29 xenografted mice. The obtained data were compared with Foslip®. After intravenous injection of the mTHPC formulations, biodistribution, pharmacokinetics and PDT-induced tumor regrowth were evaluated. In a 3D model of cells, mTHPC-EV uptake featured a deeper penetration after 24h incubation compared to liposomal mTHPC. In vivo results showed a considerable improvement of 33% tumor cure with PDT treatment applied 24h after injection, while 0% was observed after Foslip®/PDT. Moreover, 47 days were required to obtain ten times the initial tumor volume after mTHPC-EVs/PDT compared to 30 days for liposomal mTHPC. In conclusion, compared to Foslip®, mTHPC-EVs improved mTHPC biodistribution and PDT efficacy in vivo. We deduced that a major determinant factor for the improved in vivo PDT efficacy is the deep mTHPC intratumor penetration.

Nanoparticle albumin-bound mTHPC for photodynamic therapy: Preparation and comprehensive characterization of a promising drug delivery system.

Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-technology is an industrial applicable manufacturing method for the preparation of albumin-based drug carriers of poorly water-soluble drugs. In the present study the advantages of nanotechnology, albumin as an endogenous protein with the capability of high tumor enrichment and the selective light activation of the photosensitizer Temoporfin (mTHPC) were combined to a new delivery system for oncological use. The herewith provided well-established photodynamic therapy may enable a beneficial alternative for the treatment of solid tumors. In the present study a reproducible method for the preparation of stable mTHPC-albumin nanoparticles via nab-technology was established. The nanoparticles were physicochemically characterized with regard to particle size and size distribution and the impact of this preparation method on nanoparticle as well as mTHPC stability was investigated. Nanoparticles with improved colloidal stability over a broad pH range and in the presence of physiological NaCl concentrations were achieved in high yield. Due to high pressure homogenization a certain oxidative decay of mTHPC was observed. Cell culture experiments revealed an effective cellular uptake of mTHPC in a cholangiocarcinoma cell line (TFK-1). After light-activation high cytotoxicity was shown for photosensitizer loaded nanoparticles enabling the application of the proposed formulation in photodynamic therapy.

Predicting human pharmacokinetics of liposomal temoporfin using a hybrid in silico model.

Over the years, the performance of the liposomal formulations of temoporfin, Foslip® and Fospeg®, was investigated in a broad array of cell-based assays and preclinical animal models. So far, little attention has been paid to the influence of drug release and liposomal stability on the plasma concentration-time profile. The drug release is a key attribute which impacts product quality and the in vivo efficacy of nanocarrier formulations. In the present approach, the in vitro drug release and the drug-protein transfer of Foslip® and Fospeg® was determined using the dispersion releaser technology. To analyze the stability of both formulations in physiological fluids, nanoparticle tracking analysis was applied. A comparable drug release behavior and a high physical stability with a vesicle size of approximately 92 ± 2 nm for Foslip® and at 111 ± 5 nm for Fospeg® were measured. The development of a novel hybrid in silico model resulted in an optimal representation of the in vivo data. Based on the information available for previous formulations, the model enabled a prediction of the performance of Foslip® in humans. To verify the simulations, plasma concentration-time profiles of a phase I clinical trial were used. An absolute average fold error of 1.4 was achieved. Moreover, a deconvolution of the pharmacokinetic profile into different fractions relevant for the in vivo efficacy and safety was achieved. While the total plasma concentration reached a cmax of 2298 ng/mL after 0.72 h, the monomolecular drug accounted for a small fraction of the photosensitizer with a cmax of 321 ng/mL only.

Evaluation of mTHPC-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for in vitro photodynamic therapy on C6 glioma cell line.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a very attractive strategy to complement or replace common cancer treatments such as radiotherapy, surgery, and chemotherapy. Some molecules have shown their efficiency as photosensitizers (PS), still many issues have to be solved such as the inherent cytotoxicity of the PS or its hydrophobic properties causing limitation in their solubility, leading to side effects. In this study, the encapsulation of an approved PS, the meso-tetra hydroxyphenylchlorine (mTHPC, Foscan®) within biocompatible and biodegradable poly(D, l-lactide-co-glycolide) acid (PLGA) NPs prepared by the nanoprecipitation method was studied. The mTHPC-loaded NPs (mTHPC ⊂ PLGA NPs) were analyzed by UV-vis spectroscopy to determine the efficiency of mTHPC encapsulation, and by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to determine mTHPC ⊂ PLGA NPs sizes, morphologies and surface charges. The longitudinal follow-up of mTHPC release from the NPs indicated that 50% of the encapsulated PS was retained within the NP matrix after a period of five days. Finally, the cytotoxicity and the phototoxicity of the mTHPC ⊂ PLGA NPs were determined in murine C6 glioma cell lines and compared to the ones of mTHPC alone. The studies showed a strong decrease of mTHPC cytotoxicity and an increase of mTHPC photo-cytotoxicity when mTHPC was encapsulated. In order to have a better insight of the underlying cellular mechanisms that governed cell death after mTHPC ⊂ PLGA NPs incubation and irradiation, annexin V staining tests were performed. The results indicated that apoptosis was the main cell death mechanism.

Comparison of Cellular Death Pathways after mTHPC-mediated Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) in Five Human Cancer Cell Lines.

One of the most promising photosensitizers (PS) used in photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the porphyrin derivative 5,10,15,20-tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC, temoporfin), marketed in Europe under the trade name Foscan®. A set of five human cancer cell lines from head and neck and other PDT-relevant tissues was used to investigate oxidative stress and underlying cell death mechanisms of mTHPC-mediated PDT in vitro. Cells were treated with mTHPC in equitoxic concentrations and illuminated with light doses of 1.8-7.0 J/cm2 and harvested immediately, 6, 24, or 48 h post illumination for analyses. Our results confirm the induction of oxidative stress after mTHPC-based PDT by detecting a total loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) and increased formation of ROS. However, lipid peroxidation (LPO) and loss of cell membrane integrity play only a minor role in cell death in most cell lines. Based on our results, apoptosis is the predominant death mechanism following mTHPC-mediated PDT. Autophagy can occur in parallel to apoptosis or the former can be dominant first, yet ultimately leading to autophagy-associated apoptosis. The death of the cells is in some cases accompanied by DNA fragmentation and a G2/M phase arrest. In general, the overall phototoxic effects and the concentrations as well as the time to establish these effects varies between cell lines, suggesting that the cancer cells are not all dying by one defined mechanism, but rather succumb to an individual interplay of different cell death mechanisms. Besides the evaluation of the underlying cell death mechanisms, we focused on the comparison of results in a set of five identically treated cell lines in this study. Although cells were treated under equitoxic conditions and PDT acts via a rather unspecific ROS formation, very heterogeneous results were obtained with different cell lines. This study shows that general conclusions after PDT in vitro require testing on several cell lines to be reliable, which has too often been ignored in the past.

Non-metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with photodynamic therapy using intravenous mTHPC.

INTRODUCTION: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a method of treating various pathologies. In this retrospective study with prospective intent, a total of 22 patients with T1/T2 N0 cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were treated with intravenous mTHPC (meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin) and surface illumination PDT. Comparisons with the clinical features, rate of recurrence and overall outcome were made. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surface illumination PDT was offered under local anaesthesia. 0.05 mg/kg mTHPC was administered intravenously into the midcubital vein 48 h prior to tissue illumination. A single-channel 652 nm diode laser was used for illumination and light was delivered at 20 J/cm2 per site. Lesion response evaluation was carried out according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). RESULTS: Clinical assessment revealed that 16 patients had lesions of <2 cm in size (T1), while the rest were T2. No nodal involvement was identified in any of the patients. None of the patients had a locally recurrent lesion. During the 3-year follow-up, 20/22 patients had complete response (CR) and this was after one round of treatment. Two patients suffered from recurrent disease within 3 years of the follow-up, and they underwent surgical resection. CONCLUSION: PDT achieved high efficacy in the treatment of T1N0 cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with greatly reduced morbidity and disfigurement. The technique is simple, can commonly be carried out in outpatient clinics, and is highly acceptable to patients.

A dialysis-based in vitro drug release assay to study dynamics of the drug-protein transfer of temoporfin liposomes.

Today, a growing number of nanotherapeutics is utilized to deliver poorly soluble compounds using the intravenous route of administration. The drug release and the direct transfer of the active pharmaceutical ingredient to serum proteins plays an important role in bioavailability and accumulation of the drug at the target site. It is closely related to the formation of a protein corona as well as the plasma protein binding of the compound. In the present study, two in vitro drug release methods, the flow-through cell and the dispersion releaser technology, were evaluated with regards to their capability to measure a time-resolved profile of the serum protein binding. In this context, the photosensitizer temoporfin and temoporfin-loaded liposomes were tested. While in the fine capillaries of the flow-through cell a rapid agglomeration of proteins occurred, the dispersion releaser technology in combination with the four-step model enabled the measurement of the transfer of drugs from liposomes to proteins. In presence of 10% of fetal calf serum approximately 20% of the model compound temoporfin were bound to serum proteins within the first 3 h. At higher serum concentration this binding remained stable for approximately 10 h.