Comparing different analysis methods for quantifying the MRI amide proton transfer (APT) effect in hyperacute stroke patients.

Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging is a pH mapping method based on the chemical exchange saturation transfer phenomenon that has potential for penumbra identification following stroke. The majority of the literature thus far has focused on generating pH-weighted contrast using magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry analysis instead of quantitative pH mapping. In this study, the widely used asymmetry analysis and a model-based analysis were both assessed on APT data collected from healthy subjects (n = 2) and hyperacute stroke patients (n = 6, median imaging time after onset = 2 hours 59 minutes). It was found that the model-based approach was able to quantify the APT effect with the lowest variation in grey and white matter (≤ 13.8 %) and the smallest average contrast between these two tissue types (3.48 %) in the healthy volunteers. The model-based approach also performed quantitatively better than the other measures in the hyperacute stroke patient APT data, where the quantified APT effect in the infarct core was consistently lower than in the contralateral normal appearing tissue for all the patients recruited, with the group average of the quantified APT effect being 1.5 ± 0.3 % (infarct core) and 1.9 ± 0.4 % (contralateral). Based on the fitted parameters from the model-based analysis and a previously published pH and amide proton exchange rate relationship, quantitative pH maps for hyperacute stroke patients were generated, for the first time, using APT imaging.

Quantification of amide proton transfer effect pre- and post-gadolinium contrast agent administration.

PURPOSE: To compare quantification of the amide proton transfer (APT) effect pre- and post-gadolinium contrast agent (Gd) administration in order to establish to what extent Gd alters quantification of the APT effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients with internal carotid stenosis were recruited. APT imaging was acquired pre- and post-contrast in two sessions (before and after surgery) to assess the extent of relaxation time, T1 , change on APT effect calculated using magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry analysis at offsets of ±3.5 ppm relative to water resonance. Statistical and modeling evaluations were performed on the pre- and post-contrast APT effect to study the sensitivity to contrast administration. RESULTS: Before surgery, the post-contrast T1 was estimated to drop <10% of the pre-value for the majority of the patients. After surgery, higher post-contrast T1 reductions were observed in all the patients (maximum decrease was about 20% of the pre-value). Consistent differences between pre- and post-contrast were seen in the APT effect quantified using the asymmetry measure in most regions of the brain, with significant differences found in the white matter at the group level and in 25% of the individual patient results. CONCLUSION: APT imaging should be performed prior to Gd administration to avoid potential misinterpretation of the APT effect.