Effect of maternal age, height, BMI and ethnicity on birth weight: an Italian multicenter study.

AIM: To assess the effect of maternal age, height, early pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and ethnicity on birth weight. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on more than 42,000 newborns. Ethnicity was defined by maternal country of birth or, when missing (<0.6% of records), by citizenship. The effect of maternal characteristics on birth weight was evaluated with general linear models. RESULTS: Maternal height and BMI, although not age, significantly affected birth weight. Among Italian babies, 4.7% of newborns were classified as appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) (birth weight between the 10th and the 90th centile) according to the country-specific Italian Neonatal Study (INeS) charts and were re-classified as either large-(LGA) (birth weight >90th centile) or small-(SGA) (birth weight <10th centile) for gestational age (GA) after adjustment for maternal characteristics. On the contrary, 1.6% of Italian newborns were classified as SGA or LGA according to the INeS charts and re-classified as AGA after adjustment. Maternal ethnicity had a significant impact on birth weight. Specifically, babies born to Senegalese mothers were the lightest, whilst babies born to Chinese mothers were the heaviest. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal height and early pregnancy BMI, should be considered in the evaluation of birth weight. The effect of ethnicity suggests the appropriateness of ethnic-specific charts. Further studies are necessary to determine if changes in birth weight classification, may translate into improved detection of subjects at risk of adverse outcomes.

Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.

BACKGROUND: Primary cesarean deliveries are a major contributor to the large increase in cesarean delivery rates in the United States over the past 2 decades and are an essential focus for the reduction of related morbidity and costs. Studies have shown that primary cesarean delivery rates among low-risk women in the United States vary 3-fold across hospitals and are not explained by differences in patient case-mix. However, the extent to which maternal vs hospital characteristics contribute to this variation remains poorly understood because previous studies were limited in scope and did not assess the influence of factors such as maternal ethnicity subgroups or prepregnancy obesity. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the contribution of individual- and hospital-level risk factors to the hospital variation in primary cesarean delivery rates among low-risk women in Florida. STUDY DESIGN: Our population-based retrospective cohort study used Florida's linked birth certificate and hospital discharge records for the period of 2004-2011. The study population was comprised of 412,192 nulliparous, singleton, vertex, live births with labor at 37-40 weeks gestation in 122 nonmilitary delivery hospitals. Data were analyzed with logistic mixed-effects regression with cesarean delivery as the outcome. This approach provided adjusted risk estimates at an individual and hospital level and the estimated percent of hospital variation statewide that was explained by these factors. RESULTS: The primary cesarean delivery rate in the study population was 23.9%, with hospital-specific estimates that ranged from 12.8-47.3%. Leading risk factors for cesarean delivery were maternal age ≥35 years (adjusted relative risk, 2.22), prepregnancy obesity (body mass index, ≥30 kg/m(2); adjusted relative risk, 1.73), medical risk conditions (adjusted relative risk, 1.72), labor induction (adjusted relative risk, 1.52), and delivery in hospitals located in Miami-Dade County (adjusted relative risk, 1.73). Hospital geographic location was a significant effect modifier for prepregnancy obesity, medical conditions, and labor induction (P < .05), with a tendency towards lower adjusted relative risks for these factors in Miami-Dade County relative to other Florida regions. Conversely, Miami-Dade County had an increased prevalence of higher-risk ethnic subgroups, such as Cuban or Puerto Rican mothers, and also substantially higher adjusted relative risks that were associated with practice-related factors, such as delivery during weekday hours. Whereas hospital geographic location contributed to 39.6% of the observed variation statewide, the estimated contribution of maternal ethnicity ranged from 1.6-15.7% among Florida regions. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital geographic location contributes to hospital variation in primary cesarean delivery rates among low-risk women in Florida. In contrast to previous studies, our findings suggest that individual level risk factors such as maternal ethnicity also contribute to some of this variation, with differing extent by region. These individual factors likely interact with practice factors and add to the variation. This study was limited by not including maternal Bishop score before induction or obstetrics provider in the analysis. These were not available on the dataset but likely contribute to the variation. Our findings suggest potential issues to consider in quality improvement efforts, such as the need for future qualitative research that focuses on mothers in higher-risk ethnic subgroups and providers in high-rate hospitals, particularly those in Miami-Dade County. These studies may help to identify potential cultural differences in maternal beliefs and expectations for delivery and maternal reasons for differences in obstetrics practices.

Maternal Asian ethnicity and the risk of anal sphincter injury.

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between maternal Asian ethnicity (South Asian and South East/East Asian) and anal sphincter injury. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study, comparing outcomes for Asian women with those of Australian and New Zealand women. SETTING: A large metropolitan maternity service in Victoria, Australia. POPULATION: Australian/New Zealand, South Asian and South East/East Asian women who had a singleton vaginal birth from 2006 to 2012. METHODS: The relation between maternal ethnicity and anal sphincter injury was assessed by logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anal sphincter injury was defined as a third or fourth degree tear (with or without episiotomy). RESULTS: Among 32,653 vaginal births there was a significant difference in the rate of anal sphincter injury by maternal region of birth (p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounders, nulliparous women born in South Asian and South East/East Asia were 2.6 (95% confidence interval 2.2-3.3; p < 0.001) and 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.7-2.5; p < 0.001) times more likely to sustain an anal sphincter injury than Australian/New Zealand women, respectively. Parous women born in South Asian and South East/East Asia were 2.4 (95% confidence interval 1.8-3.2; p < 0.001) and 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.5-2.7; p < 0.001) times more likely to sustain an anal sphincter injury than Australian/New Zealand women, respectively. CONCLUSION: There are ethnic differences in the rates of anal sphincter injury not fully explained by known risk factors for such trauma. This may have implications for care provision.

Observed Versus Expected Distribution of Patient Self-Reported Race and Ethnicity in Quality Improvement Review Processes at a Single Safety Net Academic Institution.

Background While there is a plethora of evidence describing racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric care and outcomes, little has been published evaluating potential inequities in departmental Patient Safety and Quality Improvement (PSQI) processes.  Objective The study aims to describe the distribution of patient-reported race or ethnicity for safety events at a single safety net teaching hospital. We hypothesized that the observed versus expected case distribution for each racial or ethnic group would be similar, signifying proportional representation in the PSQI reporting and review process.  Study design We performed a cross-sectional study including all Safety Intelligence (SI) events filed on obstetric and gynecologic patients and all cases reviewed at monthly PSQI multidisciplinary departmental meetings from May 2016 to December 2021. We compared the distribution of patients' self-reported race or ethnicity as documented in the medical record to our patient population's expected race or ethnicity distribution based on historical institutional data. Results Two thousand and five SI events were filed on obstetric and gynecologic patients. Of those, 411 cases were selected for review by the departmental multidisciplinary PSQI committee, which meets once monthly. Of the 411 cases reviewed by the PSQI committee, 132 met Severe Maternal Morbidity (SMM) criteria defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Fewer SI reports were filed on Asian patients and those who declined to provide race or ethnicity (observed 4.3% versus expected 5.5%, p=0.0088 and 2.9% versus expected 1%, p<0.0001, respectively). For cases reviewed by the departmental PSQI committee and for those which met SMM criteria, there was no significant difference in race/ethnicity distribution. Conclusions There was a disparity between fewer safety events filed for Asian patients and those not reporting race/ethnicity. It was reassuring that our process did not identify other racial/ethnic disparities. However, given the widespread systemic inequities in healthcare, further evaluation of our PSQI process, and PSQI processes beyond our institution, is needed.