Ofatumumab in Rituximab-Resistant and Rituximab-Intolerant Patients With Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Case Series.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Rituximab is the first-choice therapy for patients with primary membranous nephropathy (MN) and nephrotic syndrome. However, approximately 30% of patients are treatment-resistant or become treatment-intolerant with hypersensitivity reactions upon repeated drug exposures. We aimed to assess whether ofatumumab, a fully human second-generation anti-CD20 antibody, could be a valuable alternative to rituximab in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 7 rituximab-intolerant and 10 rituximab-resistant patients with MN who consented to receive ofatumumab (50-300mg, single intravenous infusion) and were followed at the nephrology unit of Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII (Bergamo, Italy) between September 2015 and January 2019. FINDINGS: Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 5.0 (3.0-9.8) months, all 7 rituximab-intolerant and 3 of the 10 rituximab-resistant patients exhibited complete (proteinuria<0.3g/d) or partial (proteinuria<3.5g/d with≥50% reduction vs baseline) remission of nephrotic syndrome. Circulating B cells were similarly depleted in all patients by 1 week, and serum anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody concentrations decreased to<2.7 relative units/mL in 3 of 4 rituximab-intolerant and 4 of 8 rituximab-resistant patients with phospholipase A2 receptor-related disease. Ofatumumab significantly reduced 24-hour urinary protein and immunoglobulin G excretion and increased serum albumin and immunoglobulin G levels. These effects were greater in rituximab-intolerant than in rituximab-resistant patients. Measured glomerular filtration rate significantly increased by an average of 13.4% at 24 months compared with baseline (P=0.036) among all patients in the series. There were 14 nonserious infusion-related adverse events in 9 patients that recovered with temporary infusion interruption. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, limited number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ofatumumab may represent an effective and safe treatment for rituximab-intolerant cases of MN. Larger prospective studies will be needed to validate these preliminary findings and explore the effectiveness of other second-generation anti-CD20 antibodies in this clinical setting. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is one of the most frequent causes of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults. In this case series, we explored the efficacy of ofatumumab, a fully human second-generation anti-CD20 antibody, in 17 patients with MN and NS who were intolerant or unresponsive to rituximab. All 7 rituximab-intolerant patients exhibited complete or partial clinical remission, compared with only 3 of the 10 rituximab-resistant patients. Autoantibody levels decreased in all patients with phospholipase A2 receptor-related disease. Ofatumumab achieved a significant reduction in urinary protein and immunoglobulin G excretion while increasing serum albumin and immunoglobulin G levels. Ofatumumab may be a promising option for patients with MN who are rituximab-intolerant. Further investigations are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.

Efficacy and safety of four-year ofatumumab treatment in relapsing multiple sclerosis: The ALITHIOS open-label extension.

BACKGROUND: Ofatumumab has demonstrated superior efficacy and favorable safety for up to 2.5 years versus teriflunomide in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). OBJECTIVE: Further characterize efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in RMS. METHODS: Efficacy set: patients randomized to ofatumumab/teriflunomide in ASCLEPIOS I/II (core). Safety set: patients who received ⩾ 1 dose of ofatumumab in ASCLEPIOS I/II, APLIOS, APOLITOS (all core), or ALITHIOS (umbrella open-label extension). Patients received continuous ofatumumab or were newly switched from teriflunomide. Data cut-off: 25 September 2021. RESULTS: In the efficacy set (n = 1882), the continuous ofatumumab group had a low annualized relapse rate (ARR 0.05 (95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.07)), low numbers of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesions (0.01 lesions/scan) and fewer new/enlarging T2 lesions (annualized rate 0.08). Overall, 78.8% met three-parameter "no evidence of disease activity" criteria through 4 years. Switching from teriflunomide led to reduced ARR, risk of confirmed disability worsening (CDW), new/enlarging T2 lesions, Gd+ T1 lesions, and serum neurofilament light chain. In the continuous and newly switched ofatumumab groups, cumulative 3- and 6-month CDW rates remained low. In the safety set (n = 1969), the most frequently reported adverse events were infections and infestations (58.35%). No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: Ofatumumab has a favorable longer-term benefit-risk profile in RMS. TRIAL REGISTRY: ALITHIOS (NCT03650114): https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03650114.

Ofatumumab regimens in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a meta-analysis.

Ofatumumab's therapeutic impact on patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been the subject of increasing clinical research. However, in recent years, no studies have yet provided a pooled assessment of the treatment effect of ofatumumab vs. non-ofatumumab regimens. Therefore, we conducted a progression meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of ofatumumab-based treatment in CLL patients using data from clinical studies. Relevant publications from PubMed, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. The efficacy outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The articles reviewed in the mentioned databases and matching the specified keywords were searched until January 2023. The pooled efficacy analysis showed that there was a significant difference in PFS [hazard ratios (HR) = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.52-0.74] and no significant difference in OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.71-1.03) between ofatumumab-based therapy and non-ofatumumab therapy. Our analysis showed the pooled efficacy for PFS was statistically significantly improved with ofatumumab-based treatments for CLL compared with other groups. Also, ofatumumab had no statistically significant improvement in the OS of patients with CLL. Thus, ofatumumab-based therapies for CLL patients could be improved by other combinational-based regimens.

Patient and nurse preference for Sensoready autoinjector pen versus other autoinjectors in multiple sclerosis: results from a pilot multicenter survey.

BACKGROUND: Sensoready® autoinjector pen facilitates self-administration of subcutaneous ofatumumab injections at home. We aim to investigate patient and nurse preference for using Sensoready® versus comparator autoinjectors in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: A pilot survey was conducted in Germany followed by in-field interviews across United States, Germany, France, and Italy. The survey recruited 80 MS patients and 50 MS nurses. Respondents were interviewed for 45-min on qualitative open-ended and quantitative close-ended survey consisting of 31 questions for patients and 41 for nurses. Ratings were measured on Likert scale from 1 (not at all important) to 10 (extremely important). RESULTS: "Easy to perform self-injection with the pen" and "Patient able to use independently" (both, mean overall score 9.4) were the most important attributes for both patients and nurses. Sensoready® scored high across most important attributes for both patients and nurses (p < 0.05). Sensoready® was preferred over comparator devices across majority of the important attributes (84%; p < 0.05), especially ease of use of the pen (mean overall score 9.4). Sensoready® was preferred over their current device by 9/10 nurses and 8/10 patients if they had to choose a treatment based on the device alone. CONCLUSION: Both MS patients and nurses preferred the Sensoready® (ofatumumab) over comparator autoinjectors for their treatment, mostly driven by ease of administration.

Assessment of the treating physicians' first-hand experience with handling and satisfaction of ofatumumab therapy: findings from the PERITIA survey conducted in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence on experience and satisfaction of ofatumumab as a treatment option for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is limited. OBJECTIVE: To present cumulative responses from a questionnaire related to first-hand experience of treating physicians on handling and convenience of ofatumumab therapy along with concerns related to COVID-19. METHODS: PERITIA was a multicentre survey conducted to collect responses from the ASCLEPIOS I/II trial investigators from Europe via an online questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-six physicians (Germany, n = 14; Spain, n = 12; Portugal, n = 10; Italy, n = 10) completed the survey. Overall, 43% of the physicians considered the benefit-risk ratio of ofatumumab as very good. Over 93% were in favour of ofatumumab self-administration at home and the majority (83%) believed it to be completely true that self-administration of ofatumumab eases the burden for patients in terms of time. All investigators would like to potentially use anti-CD20 therapy as a long-term strategy. Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, physicians were in favour of a self-administration of MS therapy at home over other anti-CD20 therapy infusions. CONCLUSION: European neurologists who were part of this survey considered the benefit-risk-ratio of ofatumumab as favourable and the monthly self-administered subcutaneous injections offering convenience for patients in the clinical practice.

Construction and evaluation of wild and mutant ofatumumab scFvs against the human CD20 antigen.

Several monoclonal antibodies targeting the CD20 have been produced and Ofatumumab is a case in point. Although whole antibodies target cancer cells effectively, their applications are restricted in some ways. Single-chain fragment variable antibodies, rather than employing the entire structure of antibodies, have proven a practical approach for creating completely functional antigen-binding fragments. In current research, the DNA coding sequence of VL and VH of the wild and mutant forms of ofatumumab were joined with a flexible linker (GGGGS)3 separately. Using the E. coli BL21 (DE3) expression system, the VL-linker-VH genes were cloned into the pET-28 a (+), and the associated recombinant proteins were produced. Purified and refolded scFvs (scFv-C and scFv-V3) represented a concentration of around 0.7 mg/ml from 1 L of initial E. coli culture with a molecular weight of about 27 kDa. Affinity measurement disclosed anti-CD20 scFv-V3 possesses a higher affinity constant compared to anti-CD20 scFv-C. The recombinant scFvs exclusively attach to Raji cells but not to Jurkat cells, according to a cell-ELISA analysis. The MTT test signified anti-CD20 scFvs could affect cell viability in Raji cells but had no impact on Jurkat cells and also, Raji cells viability was affected more significantly by anti-CD20 scFv-V3.

Targeting CD20 in multiple sclerosis - review of current treatment strategies.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that mostly manifests as irreversible disability. The aetiopathogenesis of MS is still unclear, although it was initially thought to be primarily mediated by T-cells. Research into the immune concepts of MS pathophysiology in recent years has led to a shift in the understanding of its origin i.e. from a T-cell-mediated to a B-cell-mediated molecular background. Thus, the use of B-cell-selective therapies, such as anti- -CD20 antibody therapy, as expanded therapeutic options for MS is now strongly supported. This review provides an up-to-date discussion on the use of anti-CD20 targeted therapy in MS treatment. We present a rationale for its use and summarise the results of the main clinical trials showing the efficacy and safety of rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab. Future directions that show selectivity to a broader population of lymphocytes, such as the use of anti-CD19 targeted antibodies, as well as the concept of extended interval dosing (EID) of anti-CD20 drugs, are also discussed in this review.

The use of obinutuzumab and ofatumumab in the treatment of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, can be used to treat immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) during acute presentation or disease relapse. Undesirable side-effects include severe hypersensitivity reactions, particularly anaphylaxis and rituximab-induced serum sickness, with a minority not maintaining a response to treatment. Alternative humanised anti-CD20 treatments, obinutuzumab and ofatumumab, have been used. A review of the UK TTP Registry showed 15 patients received these drugs over 26 treatment episodes (eight obinutuzumab and 18 ofatumumab). Indications for alternative anti-CD20 treatment were severe infusion-related reactions, acute rituximab-induced serum sickness and a short duration of disease remission. All patients achieved disease remission (ADAMTS13 [A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13] activity ≥30 iu/dl) after a median 15 days and 92% of episodes achieved complete remission (≥60 iu/dl). Seven patients required further treatment for disease relapse with a median relapse-free survival of 17.4 months. All patients continued to respond to re-treatment with the preceding drug when relapse occurred. There were four adverse events in 26 treatment episodes (15%) - two infections and two infusion reactions. These results suggest that obinutuzumab and ofatumumab may be considered as an alternative option to rituximab in the treatment of iTTP with a comparable safety profile, absence of significant hypersensitivity reactions and sustained normalisation of ADAMTS13.

Ofatumumab with iphosphamide, etoposide and cytarabine for patients with transplantation-ineligible relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The efficacy of salvage treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who relapse or progress (rrDLBCL) after initial therapy is limited. Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab with iphosphamide, etoposide and cytarabine (O-IVAC) was evaluated in a single-arm study. Dosing was modified for elderly patients. Patients received up to six cycles of treatment. The primary end-point was the overall response rate (ORR). Patients were evaluated every two cycles and then six and 12 months after treatment. Other end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Seventy-seven patients received salvage treatment with O-IVAC. The average age was 56.8 years; 39% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of at least 3; 78% had disease of Ann Arbor stage 3 or 4; 58% received one or more prior salvage therapies. The ORR for O-IVAC was 54.5%. The median duration of study follow-up was 70 months. The median PFS and EFS were 16.3 months each. The median OS was 22.7 months. Age, ECOG performance status and the number of prior therapy lines were independent predictors of survival. Treatment-related mortality was 15.5%. O-IVAC showed a high response rate in a difficult-to-treat population and is an attractive treatment to bridge to potentially curative therapies.

Safety experience with continued exposure to ofatumumab in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis for up to 3.5 years.

BACKGROUND: Ofatumumab is approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Ongoing safety reporting is crucial to understand its long-term benefit-risk profile. OBJECTIVE: Report the safety and tolerability of ofatumumab in RMS after extended treatment up to 3.5 years. METHODS: Patients completing ASCLEPIOS I/II (phase 3), APLIOS, or APOLITOS (phase 2) trials could enter ALITHIOS, a phase 3b, open-label, long-term safety study. We analyzed cumulative data of continuous ofatumumab treatment and of patients newly switched from teriflunomide. RESULTS: The safety population had 1969 patients: 1292 continuously treated with ofatumumab (median time-at-risk 35.5 months, 3253 patient-years) and 677 newly switched (median time-at-risk 18.3 months, 986 patient-years). A total of 1650 patients (83.8%) had ⩾1 adverse events and 191 (9.7%) had ⩾1 serious adverse events. No opportunistic infections or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy events were identified; the risk of malignancies was low. Mean serum immunoglobulin (Ig) G levels remained stable. Mean IgM levels decreased but remained above the lower limit of normal in most. Serious infection incidence was low; decreased Ig levels were not associated with serious infections. CONCLUSION: In patients with up to 3.5 years' exposure, ofatumumab was well tolerated, with no new safety risks identified. These findings, with its established effectiveness, support a favorable benefit-risk profile of ofatumumab in RMS.

Rapid and sustained B-cell depletion with subcutaneous ofatumumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: APLIOS, a randomized phase-2 study.

BACKGROUND: Ofatumumab, the first fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is approved in several countries for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the bioequivalence of ofatumumab administered by an autoinjector versus a pre-filled syringe (PFS) and to explore the effect of ofatumumab on B-cell depletion. METHODS: APLIOS (NCT03560739) is a 12-week, open-label, parallel-group, phase-2 study in patients with RMS receiving subcutaneous ofatumumab 20 mg every 4 weeks (q4w) (from Week 4, after initial doses on Days 1, 7, and 14). Patients were randomized 10:10:1:1 to autoinjector or PFS in the abdomen, or autoinjector or PFS in the thigh, respectively. Bioequivalence was determined by area under the curve (AUCτ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for Weeks 8-12. B-cell depletion and safety/tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients contributed to the bioequivalence analyses (autoinjector-abdomen, n = 128; PFS-abdomen, n = 128). Abdominal ofatumumab pharmacokinetic exposure was bioequivalent for autoinjector and PFS (geometric mean AUCτ, 487.7 vs 474.1 h × µg/mL (ratio 1.03); Cmax, 1.409 vs 1.409 µg/mL (ratio 1.00)). B-cell counts (median cells/µL) depleted rapidly in all groups from 214.0 (baseline) to 2.0 (Day 14). Ofatumumab was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Ofatumumab 20 mg q4w self-administered subcutaneously via autoinjector is bioequivalent to PFS administration and provides rapid B-cell depletion.

Effect of ofatumumab versus placebo in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients from Japan and Russia: Phase 2 APOLITOS study.

BACKGROUND: Ofatumumab, the first fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has been developed as a treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) which can be self-administered at home. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in RMS patients from Japan and Russia. METHODS: APOLITOS included a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled core-part followed by an open-label extension-part. Patients were randomized (2:1) to subcutaneous ofatumumab 20 mg or placebo. Primary outcome was the number of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesions per scan over 24 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were randomized (ofatumumab, n = 43; placebo, n = 21). Primary endpoint was met; ofatumumab reduced Gd + T1 lesions versus placebo by 93.6% (p < 0.001) and the results were consistent across regions (Japan/Russia). Ofatumumab reduced annualized T2 lesion and relapse rate versus placebo by week 24. Both groups showed benefit from ofatumumab in the extension-part. Incidence of adverse events was lower with ofatumumab versus placebo (69.8% vs 81.0%); injection-related reactions were most common. No deaths, opportunistic infections, or malignancies were reported. CONCLUSION: Ofatumumab demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo, with sustained effect through 48 weeks in RMS patients from Japan/Russia. Switching to ofatumumab after 24 weeks led to rapid radiological and clinical benefits. Safety findings were consistent with pivotal trials.

Use of ofatumumab and eplerenone in post-transplant recurrence of FSGS.

BACKGROUND: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) predisposes patients for risk of recurrent disease in allografts. METHODS: We report a case of a recipient of an unrelated living donor renal transplant and discuss considerations for utilization of ofatumumab and eplerenone in treatment for recurrent FSGS. RESULTS: The recipient was initially managed with scheduled plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and rituximab post-transplant during index hospitalization. With notable recurrence of FSGS noted on kidney transplant biopsy, she was initially treated with additional plasmapheresis sessions leading to downtrend in proteinuria. The patient was then transitioned to LDL-A pheresis, which resulted again in uptrend in proteinuria. This prompted return to scheduled plasmapheresis sessions weekly, leading again to a downtrend in proteinuria. Albumin levels remained within normal range throughout her course. Following initiation of eplerenone and ofatumumab, the patient demonstrated normalization of urine protein:creatinine ratio and remission of FSGS recurrence without need for additional apheresis. CONCLUSIONS: With notable risk of recurrence of FSGS in kidney transplants leading to allograft failure, the use of ofatumumab and eplerenone in conjunction should be considered for management to induce remission.

Human or Chimeric Monoclonal Anti-CD20 Antibodies for Children with Nephrotic Syndrome: A Superiority Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: The chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is effective in steroid-dependent and calcineurin inhibitor-dependent forms of nephrotic syndrome, but many patients relapse at 1 year. Because ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has a more extended binding site and higher affinity to CD20 compared with rituximab, it might offer superior efficacy in these patients. METHODS: We designed a single-center randomized clinical trial to compare the long-term efficacy of ofatumumab versus rituximab in children and young adults with nephrotic syndrome maintained in remission with prednisone and calcineurin inhibitors. We randomized 140 children and young adults (aged 2-24 years) to receive intravenous ofatumumab (1.50 mg/1.73 m2) or rituximab (375 mg/m2). After infusions, oral drugs were tapered and withdrawn within 60 days. The primary outcome was relapse at 1 year, which was analyzed following the intent-to-treat principle. The secondary endpoint was relapse within 24 months from infusion, on the basis of urine dipstick and confirmed by a urine protein-to-creatinine ratio <200. RESULTS: At 12 months, 37 of 70 (53%) participants who received ofatumumab experienced relapse versus 36 of 70 (51%) who received rituximab (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.55 to 2.06). At 24 months, 53 of 70 (76%) participants who received ofatumumab experienced relapse, versus 46 of 70 (66%) who received rituximab (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.8 to 3.3). The two groups exhibited comparable B cell subpopulation reconstitution and did not differ in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of ofatumumab was not superior to a single dose of rituximab in maintaining remission in children with steroid-dependent and calcineurin inhibitor-dependent nephrotic syndrome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02394119) and https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search (2015-000624-28).

[B-cell depletion in the therapy of multiple sclerosis: ofatumumab is a new player]. / B-sejt-depletio a sclerosis mulitplex terápiájában: új szereplo az ofatumumab.

Research results in recent years have demonstrated that B-lymphocytes play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). The increased understanding of the disease process has resulted in the development of B cell-targeting antibodies as potential drugs for both relapsing and progressive forms of MS. Therefore, B-cell depletion therapies are becoming more prominent and determining in reducing disease progression. The first B-cell depleting anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody was rituximab, which has also been studied in MS and, following favourable results, new drugs have been developed with a similar point of attack. In 2017, the FDA and in 2018, the EMA approved ocrelizumab, another anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). This was a particularly significant advance in the treatment of PPMS, as it was the first medication with a proven effect of reducing progression in PPMS. Ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has emerged recently as a new player in B-cell depletion therapy. The drug has also recently been approved by the EMA in March 2021 for use in relapsing forms of MS. In this review, we detail the mechanism of action and efficacy of anti-CD20 therapies currently used in MS.

Hyper-CVAD plus ofatumumab versus hyper-CVAD plus rituximab as frontline therapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone plus ofatumumab hyper-CVAD + ofatumumab (hyper-CVAD + ofatumumab) has not been compared with the outcome of hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone plus ofatumumab hyper-CVAD plus rituximab (hyper-CVAD + Rituximab) in Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: The authors compared the outcomes of 69 patients treated with hyper-CVAD + ofatumumab and 95 historical-control patients treated with hyper-CVAD + Rituximab. Historical-control patients were treated with hyper-CVAD + Rituximab if they had CD20 expression ≥ 20%. Ofatumumab (day 1 of course 1, 300 mg intravenously; subsequent doses, 2000 mg intravenously) was administered on days 1 and 11 of courses 1 and 3 and on days 1 and 8 of courses 2 and 4 for a total of 8 doses. A propensity score analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to adjust for baseline covariates between groups. RESULTS: The median event-free survival with stem cell transplantation (SCT) censoring was 33 and 65 months with hyper-CVAD + Rituximab and hyper-CVAD + ofatumumab, respectively (crude P = .064; IPTW P = .054). The median overall survival with SCT censoring was 52 months and not reached, respectively (crude P = .087; IPTW P = .097). CONCLUSIONS: Hyper-CVAD + ofatumumab was associated with better outcomes than hyper-CVAD + Rituximab among patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL.

A phase 3, randomized study of ofatumumab combined with bendamustine in rituximab-refractory iNHL (COMPLEMENT A + B study).

The standard of care for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) is rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, with/without chemotherapy. However, multiple relapses are common in these patients. This phase 3, randomized study compared outcomes of a combination of ofatumumab (a second-generation anti-CD20 antibody) and bendamustine, with bendamustine alone in patients unresponsive to prior rituximab-based treatment. Overall, 346 patients were randomized to receive either the combination or bendamustine alone. Bendamustine was given for ≤8 cycles and ofatumumab for ≤12 cycles. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) after 215 protocol-defined events assessed by independent review committee (IRC). Median IRC-assessed PFS was 16·7 and 13·8 months in the combination and monotherapy arms respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 0·82; P = 0·1390]. Median overall survival (OS) was 58·2 and 51·8 months in the combination and monotherapy arms respectively (HR = 0·89, P = 0·4968). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Overall, 73% and 80% of patients in the combination and monotherapy arms, respectively, experienced a ≥grade 3 adverse event. The study did not meet its primary end-point. No significant improvement in PFS and OS was seen with the combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine as compared with bendamustine alone in rituximab-refractory iNHL (NCT01077518).

A phase II trial of bendamustine in combination with ofatumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory marginal zone B-cell lymphomas.

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) are indolent yet incurable lymphomas with frequent relapses following therapy. For patients with relapsed/refractory disease, no standard therapies exist. Here we report results of an exploratory phase II study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of the alkylator agent bendamustine in combination with the second-generation anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, ofatumumab, in patients with relapsed or refractory MZL. Patients with MZL and previously treated with at least one line of systemic therapy were eligible. Treatment consisted in bendamustine (90 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2) and ofatumumab (1000 mg on day 1) in 28-day cycles for up to six cycles. Sixteen patients were included in the trial. In one patient, the diagnosis was revised after two cycles of treatment and was excluded from the efficacy analysis. Among 15 patients with MZL, 14 were evaluable for response: the overall and complete response rates were 92.9% and 57.1%, respectively. The median duration of response was 30.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.5 -not estimable) and 2-years progression-free survival 77% (95% CI, 43%-92%). Fifteen patients (94%) experienced grade 3-4 adverse events. Toxicity was mostly hematological. Neutropenia grade ≥3 was recorded in 27% of patients, lymphocytopenia in 93%, and infections and febrile neutropenia each in 13%. One patient discontinued treatment due to myocardial infarction; no treatment-related deaths occurred. The combination of bendamustine with ofatumumab was active with an acceptable toxicity profile in this small phase II trial and can be considered for further investigation in relapsed/refractory MZL patients.

Five-year survival follow-up of a phase III randomised trial comparing ofatumumab versus physicians' choice for bulky fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a short report.

In 2014, an interim analysis of a phase 3 study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of ofatumumab in patients with bulky fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (BFR CLL) as compared to physician's choice. The five-year follow-up of this phase 3 trial showed that ofatumumab therapy resulted in a numerically but not significantly longer overall survival. As only few patients had the chance to receive a kinase inhibitor later, the study displays the survival of BFR CLL patients in the period prior to receiving small-molecule inhibitors. Ofatumumab is a well-tolerable treatment option in multiresistant advanced CLL.

A five-year follow-up of untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with ofatumumab and chlorambucil: final analysis of the Complement 1 phase 3 trial.

The Complement 1 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab + chlorambucil with chlorambucil monotherapy in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). On long-term follow-up in the chemoimmunotherapy arm vs. the chemotherapy arm there was an estimated 12% (not significant) and 39% risk reduction in overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively. A high rate (61%) of treatment with next-line therapies in both the treatment arms may dilute any potential OS difference and confound the interpretation of the OS results. Addition of ofatumumab to chlorambucil demonstrated clinical benefit and tolerability as a frontline treatment option in patients unfit for fludarabine-containing therapy, with no new safety concerns.