Entrustment Checkpoint: Clinical Supervisors' Perceptions of the Emergency Department Oral Case Presentation.

Phenomenon: The oral case presentation represents a unique method of communication and forms the foundation for trainee-supervisor interactions in the clinical setting. Recently, entrustment has been highlighted as an essential element of trainee-supervisor interactions. Despite the growing body of knowledge concerning entrustment in medical education, how supervisors conceptualize the oral case presentation as a contributor to entrustment decision making during clinical supervision remains unknown. Given their widespread use, oral case presentations may represent a potential tool for future frameworks of workplace-based assessment. This study sought to explore what factors influence supervisors' expectations of oral case presentation content and how the oral case presentation may contribute to entrustment decision making. Approach: Using qualitative methodology, semistructured interviews were conducted from a purposive sample of attending emergency medicine physicians at an academic medical center from 2015 to 2016. Thematic analysis of the semistructured interview transcripts was conducted by 2 investigators using line-by-line coding and constant comparative analysis. Key themes were identified through consensus. Theoretical sampling occurred until thematic saturation was reached. Findings: Twenty-one attending physicians were interviewed. Four factors were found to influence supervisor expectations pertaining to oral case presentation content (trainee level, trainee familiarity, clinical context, and clinical task). Further, the oral case presentation was found to serve as a means of indirect observation and an entrustment check point informing future decisions relating to trainee supervision. Insights: The oral case presentation represents a core activity within the trainee-supervisor relationship in which entrustment plays a central role. Given the numerous factors influencing oral case presentation content, we caution supervisors against relying solely on the oral case presentation as an entrustment check point, as this may lead to inaccurate judgments of trainee competence. We recommend that the oral case presentation be used in conjunction with other means of direct and indirect observation to assist with entrustment decisions relating to trainee supervision.

Medical student perceptions on the instruction of the emergency medicine oral case presentation.

BACKGROUND: The emergency medicine oral case presentation (EM OCP) is the clinician's communication tool to justify whether urgent intervention is required, to argue for ruling out emergent disease states, and to propose safe disposition plans in the context of triaging patients for medical care and prioritization of resources. The EM OCP provides the representation of the practice of emergency medicine, yet we do not know the current level of effectiveness of its instruction. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to document medical student perceptions and expectations of the instruction of the EM OCP. METHODS: We surveyed medical students from five institutions after their emergency medicine clerkship on their instruction of the EM OCP. Analysis included univariate descriptive statistics and chi-squared analyses for interactions. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five medical students (82%) completed the survey. Most medical students reported the EM OCP to be unique compared to that of other disciplines (86%), integral to their clerkship evaluation (77%), and felt that additional teaching was required beyond their current medical school instruction (78%). A minority report being specifically taught the EM OCP (37%), that their instruction was consistent (29%), or that expectations of the EM OCP were clear (21%). Respondents felt that brief instruction during their orientation (65%) and reading with a portable summary card (45%) would improve their EM OCP skills, whereas other modalities would be less helpful. CONCLUSION: This study identifies a need for additional specific and consistent teaching of the EM OCP to medical students and their preference on how to receive this instruction.

Acting like a doctor: oral case presentation curriculum for medical students.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Background Verbal communication is an important element to clinical practice and an integral part of undergraduate medical education. The oral case presentation (OCP) is often used in professional verbal communication and remains commonplace in the clinical setting. The OCP additionally has a complex role in undergraduate teaching. Methods We designed a OCP curriculum taking into account reasoning, rhetorical and linguistic mechanisms. Delivered through a content and drama workshop involving a trained theatre actor to 45 pre-clinical, undergraduate medical students at our U.K. institution. Students were assessed objectively at weekly intervals by trained faculty. A paired t-test was performed to determine if the curriculum was effective in increasing OCP scores. Students' confidence was assessed using Likert scales. Findings An overall mean score improvement (M=20.3, SD 14.6, N=45) was significantly greater than zero, t (44) =9.3, two tail p <0.05, providing evidence that the curriculum was effective. A 95% confidence interval around the mean difference in score was 15.9-24.7. Confidence scores for both non-verbal and verbal elements of the OCP improved. Conclusion This curriculum led to an improvement in OCP scores and increased our students 'confidence with this modality of communication. Consideration should be given to incorporating dedicated teaching of the OCP in undergraduate education.

The oral case presentation: toward a performance-based rhetorical model for teaching and learning.

The oral case presentation is an important communicative activity in the teaching and assessment of students. Despite its importance, not much attention has been paid to providing support for teachers to teach this difficult task to medical students who are novices to this form of communication. As a formalized piece of talk that takes a regularized form and used for a specific communicative goal, the case presentation is regarded as a rhetorical activity and awareness of its rhetorical and linguistic characteristics should be given due consideration in teaching. This paper reviews practitioners' and the limited research literature that relates to expectations of medical educators about what makes a good case presentation, and explains the rhetorical aspect of the activity. It is found there is currently a lack of a comprehensive model of the case presentation that projects the rhetorical and linguistic skills needed to produce and deliver a good presentation. Attempts to describe the structure of the case presentation have used predominantly opinion-based methodologies. In this paper, I argue for a performance-based model that would not only allow a description of the rhetorical structure of the oral case presentation, but also enable a systematic examination of the tacit genre knowledge that differentiates the expert from the novice. Such a model will be a useful resource for medical educators to provide more structured feedback and teaching support to medical students in learning this important genre.