Biportal endoscopic paraspinal decompressive foraminotomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis: clinical outcomes and factors influencing unsatisfactory outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) is an important pathologic entity that causes lumbar radiculopathies. Unrecognized LFS may be associated with surgical failure, and LFS remains challenging to treat surgically. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of decompressive foraminotomy performed using the biportal endoscopic paraspinal approach for LFS. METHODS: A total of 102 consecutive patients with single-level unilateral LFS who underwent biportal endoscopic paraspinal decompressive foraminotomy were included. We evaluated the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before and after surgery. Demographic, preoperative data, and radiologic parameters, including the coronal root angle (CRA), were investigated. The patients were divided into Group A (satisfaction group) and Group B (unsatisfaction group). Parameters were compared between these two groups to identify the factors influencing unsatisfactory outcomes. RESULTS: In Group A (78.8% of patients), VAS and ODI scores significantly improved after biportal endoscopic paraspinal decompressive foraminotomy (p < 0.001). However, Group B (21.2% of patients) showed higher incidences of stenosis at the lower lumbar level (p = 0.009), wide segmental lordosis (p = 0.021), and narrow ipsilateral CRA (p = 0.009). In the logistic regression analysis, lower lumbar level (OR = 13.82, 95% CI: 1.33-143.48, p = 0.028) and narrow ipsilateral CRA (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-1.00, p = 0.047) were associated with unsatisfactory outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement in clinical outcomes was observed for a year after biportal endoscopic paraspinal decompressive foraminotomy. However, clinical outcomes were unsatisfactory in 21.2% of patients, and lower lumbar level and narrow ipsilateral CRA were independent risk factors for unsatisfactory outcomes.

Long-term follow-up results of surgically treated patients with foraminal and far lateral disc herniations.

PURPOSE: Foraminal and far lateral disc herniations are rarer cause of nerve root compression. There are reports regarding the outcome, however long-term follow-up results of surgically treated patients are few. The purpose of this retrospective study is to analyze the clinical characteristics and long-term surgical outcomes of the foraminal and far lateral disc herniations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 114 patients who underwent an operation for foraminal and far lateral disc herniaitions were reviewed. Visual analogue scale of back and leg pain, the ocurrence of motor deficit and sensory dysesthesia before and after operations were used to compare the results of early and long-term outcome. RESULTS: A total of 114 telephone interviews were conducted. The mean follow up was 134 months. Complete relief of symptoms were reported by 77 patients (67.1%). The average VAS of radicular leg pain was 7.5 Post-operatively the average VAS of radicular pain decreased to 2.2. Preoperatively, 9 patients (7.6%) had motor deficit and 17 (14.4%) patients had sensory dysesthesia. Post-operatively 9 (100%) of the patients showed motor, and 12 (70.6%) of the patients showed sensory improvement. In 17 patients with hypoesthesia the complaints continued during 2 weeks to 6 months. They were given gabapentin as medical treatment, however 5 of these patients still have sensory dysesthesia. The outcome was: 67.1% excellent (77 patients), 26.3% good (30 patients), 6.1% fair (7 patients). CONCLUSION: The far lateral approach is a minimally invasive and safe procedure with low complication rates.

How I do it: biportal endoscopic paraspinal approach for recurrent lumbar disc herniation following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

BACKGROUND: Although percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has been popularized as an alternative to microscopic lumbar discectomy, it has been reported to be associated with a re-herniation rate of 5-11%. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) might occur not only at the same level previously operated upon but also at the annular penetration site created during PELD procedures. METHOD: Biportal endoscopic paraspinal approach (BE-Para) was used for revisional foraminal lumbar discectomy. Procedures and some discussions regarding indications, advantages, potential complications, and ways to avoid complications were described. CONCLUSION: BE-Para may be an effective modality for RLDH after PELD.

A Comparison of Outcomes between the Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation and the Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Multi-Segmental Thoracolumbar Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: Multi-segmental thoracolumbar fracture (MSF) generally refers to fractures occurring in two or more segments of the thoracolumbar spine. With the development of minimally invasive concept, there is little research on its application in the field of MSF. The purpose of this study is to compare two minimally invasive surgical techniques and determine which one is more suitable for treating patients with neurologically intact MSF. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 49 MSF patients with intact nerves who were admitted from January 2017 to February 2019. Among them, 25 cases underwent percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF), and 24 cases underwent Wiltse approach pedicle screw fixation (WAPSF). The operation time, number of fixed segments, blood loss, length of incision, postoperative ambulation time, accuracy of pedicle screw placement, facet joint violation (FJV), number of C-arm exposures, as well as pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), local Cobb's angle (LCA), and percentage of anterior vertebral body height (PAVBH) were recorded for both groups. Paired sample t-test was used for intra-group comparison before and after surgery while independent sample t-test was used for inter-group comparison. RESULTS: The differences in the number of fixed segments, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative bed time, accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement, VAS, and ODI between the two groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, the operative time and total surgical incision length were significantly shorter in the WAPSF group than in the PPSF group (p < 0.05), and the FJV was significantly higher in the PPSF group than in the WAPSF group (p < 0.05). Also, the PPSF group received more intraoperative fluoroscopy (p < 0.05). The result of LCA and PAVBH in the WAPSF group were significantly better than in the PPSF group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both PPSF and WAPSF were found to be safe and effective in the treatment of MSF without neurological deficits through our study. However, considering radiation exposure, FJV, vertebral height restoration, correction of kyphosis, and learning curve, WAPSF may be a better choice for neurologically intact MSF.

Paraspinal muscle approach for neuromuscular scoliosis: A comparative study evaluating deformity correction and perioperative morbidity in 91 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up.

Purpose: We present the paraspinal approach use for neuromuscular scoliosis with focus on deformity correction, perioperative (≤30 days) morbidity and outcome at a minimal follow-up length of 2 years. Methods: We prospectively collected data of 61 neuromuscular scoliosis patients operated using a paraspinal (Wiltse) approach between 2013 and 2019. We additionally collected data of 104 control cases, operated using a midline approach between 2005 and 2016. Fifteen Wiltse, respectively 37 control patients were excluded due to a short follow-up (<2 years), and 22 controls were excluded secondary to lacking follow-up data. Hence, 46 Wiltse and 45 control patients were compared. Results: Wiltse and control patients had comparable follow-up lengths, demographics, deformity corrections, complication rates, number of levels fused, and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay. Wiltse cases had a lower estimated blood loss (535 vs 1187 mL; p-value < 0.001), allogenic transfusion rate (48% vs 96%; p-value < 0.001), and operating time (ORT) (337 vs 428 min; p-value < 0.001) than controls. This was also the case when selecting for patients without pelvic fixation (p-values < 0.001). When selecting the cases with pelvic fixation (20 among 91 cases), only the number of levels fused and the ORT differed significantly according to the approach (p-value <0.015 and <0.041). Conclusion: The paraspinal approach for neuromuscular scoliosis is safe, associated with significant deformity correction, reduced estimated blood loss, and allogenic transfusion rate. These potential benefits still need to be evaluated, especially for cases with pelvic fixation, with further follow-up of larger cohorts. Level of evidence: level III.

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Decompression of Extraforaminal Stenosis at the Lumbosacral Junction: Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe the unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique for decompression of extraforaminal stenosis at L5-S1 and evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes. Especially, we evaluated compression factors of extraforaminal stenosis at L5-S1 and described the surgical technique for decompression in detail. METHODS: Thirty-five patients who underwent UBE decompression for extraforaminal stenosis at L5-S1 between March 2018 and February 2019 were enrolled. Clinical results were analyzed using the MacNab criteria, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Compression factors evaluated pseudoarthrosis within the transverse process of L5 and ala of sacrum, disc bulging with or without osteophytes, and the thickened lumbosacral and extraforaminal ligament. RESULTS: The mean back VAS was 3.7 ± 1.8 before surgery, which dropped to 2.3 ± 0.8 at 1-year postoperative follow-up (p < 0.001). There was a significant drop in postoperative mean VAS for leg pain from 7.2 ± 1.1 to 2.3 ± 1.2 at 1 year (p < 0.001). The ODI was 61.5 before surgery and 28.6 (p < 0.001). Pseudoarthrosis between the transverse process and the ala was noted in all cases (35 of 35, 100%). Pure disc bulging was seen in 12 patients (34.3%), and disc bulging with osteophytes was demonstrated in 23 patients. The thickened lumbosacral and extraforaminal ligament were identified in 19 cases (51.4%). No complications occurred in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: In the current study, good surgical outcomes without complications were achieved after UBE decompression for extraforaminal stenosis at L5-S1.

Comparison of the modified Wiltse's approach with spinal minimally invasive system and traditional approach for the therapy of thoracolumbar fracture.

Thoracolumbar fractures are usually treated by open posterior pedicle screw fixation. However, this procedure involves massive paraspinal muscle stripping, inflicting surgical trauma, and prolonged X-ray exposure. In this study, we observed 127 patients with single-segment injury thoracolumbar fractures. Thirty-six patients were treated by the modified Wiltse's paraspinal approach with minimally invasive channel system, while 91 patients were treated via traditional posterior approach. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, screw placement accuracy, visual analogue scale score, and Cobb's angle of two groups were compared. The X-ray exposure times were notably reduced (4.2±1.6) in the new approach group (P<0.05). The pedicle screw placement accuracy and Cobb's angle after surgery were similar in the two groups. We conclude that modified Wiltse's paraspinal approach with spinal minimally invasive channel system surgery can significantly reduce the X-ray exposure times and is an alternative therapy for the thoracolumbar fracture.

A Novel, Minimally Invasive Hybrid Technique to Approach Intracanal Herniated Thoracic Discs.

BACKGROUND: Multiple options exist for thoracic disc herniation (TDH). However, when a specific technique is chosen, the goal is to avoid the manipulation of the spinal cord, which is already compressed. OBJECTIVE: To describe a hybrid endoscopic technique for intracanal TDH by combining an oblique paraspinal approach (OPA) and transforaminal full-endoscopic discectomy. METHODS: We describe the step-by-step operative technique and present the clinical and radiological outcomes of a case series of hybrid endoscopic thoracic discectomy. RESULTS: A total of 3 patients were treated. We observed the usefulness of an OPA to enlarge the intervertebral foramen through the rigid tubular retractor and the feasibility of a full-endoscopic transforaminal approach to reach intracanal TDHs. CONCLUSION: Early experience with the hybrid endoscopic technique for TDHs demonstrated acceptable clinical and radiological outcomes in the 3 patients treated; however, a larger sample size and a methodologically advantageous study to compare this procedure with conventional options are necessary to probe the full benefits of the hybrid technique.

Biportal Endoscopic Excision of Facetal Cyst in the Far Lateral Region of L5S1: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is a recently introduced technique that utilizes 2 portals, one for endoscopy and one as a working portal, in contrast to full endoscopy, which utilizes a single portal. The advantages are a favorable learning curve and free mobility of instruments in the operative field. UBE is successful in addressing cervical and lumbar disc herniations, lumbar stenosis, and foraminal/extraforaminal pathologies, such as herniations and foraminal stenosis. However, there is no report of UBE for a far-lateral L5S1 facet cyst. The patient was an 85-yr-old female with a left lower limb radicular pain with magnetic resonance imaging evidence of the facet cyst compressing the L5 nerve root. Conventional treatment of such a condition would either be an L5S1 fusion procedure or a standalone decompression via the Wiltse paramedian approach. Because the patient had no instability, we decided to do a standalone decompression using the UBE technique. The UBE technique has the advantages of any minimal access procedure, including small incisions, minimal tissue dissection, good magnification, and preservation of anatomic structures. A written informed consent was obtained from the patient before the procedure. The procedure was done under general anesthesia using a 30° endoscope, a radiofrequency probe, and standard lumbar spine surgery instruments. The initial landing point of the endoscope and instruments is via triangulation at the lateral border of the isthmus of L5. The postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes were satisfactory (VAS Back and Leg, 0; Oswestry disability index, 15 at 3 mo).

Comparison of Hidden Blood Loss Between Three Different Surgical Approaches for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fracture.

Purpose: To examine the hidden blood loss (HBL) in treatment of AO type A1-A3 thoracolumbar fractures with three different approaches and to explore the influential factors of HBL among patients after the surgery of internal fixation for thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: We retrospectively studied 85 patients in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: 25 patients via percutaneous approach (Group A), 33 patients via paraspinal approach (Group B), and 27 patients via conventional open approach (Group C). The demographic information of the patients was collected. Each patient's preoperative and postoperative hematocrit were recorded and used for calculating the blood loss according to the Gross's formula. The difference of blood loss between the three groups was measured by ANOVA. And influential factors were further analyzed by multivariate linear regression analysis in each group. Results: The average HBL was 240.0 ± 65.1 mL in Group A, 313.7 ± 138.1 mL in Group B, and 382 ± 153.8 mL in Group C. There was statistical difference in the HBL between three groups (P = 0.000). However, multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that HBL of three approaches was not associated with age, gender, body mass index (BMI), percentage of height loss, percentage of height restoration, fracture type, or operation time. Conclusion: There was a substantial HBL in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, which was neglected by surgeons. Further investigation is necessary to study the risk factors for surgery on HBL in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

How to perform the Wiltse posterolateral spinal approach: Technical note.

BACKGROUND: The paraspinal, posterolateral, or Wiltse approach is an old technique that observes the principles of an MIS procedure. The aim of this study was to provide a step-by-step description from the literature of the Wiltse paraspinal approach and analyze its main advantages and limitations. METHODS: Here, we provide a step-by-step description of the Wiltse approach. Utilizing PubMed and Lilacs and the Mesh terms "Wiltse approach," "paraspinal approach," "muscle sparing approach," and "lumbar spine," we identified 10 papers. We then put together, based on these publications, a step-by-step analysis of the preparation, patient positioning, skin incision, fascial opening, dissection, bone identification, retractors, deperiostization, decompression, discectomy, instrumentation, arthrodesis, and closure for the Wiltse technique. RESULTS: Most papers underscored the minimally invasive aspects of the typical Wiltse approach. Advantages included minimal intraoperative bleeding, a shorter hospital length of stay, and a low infection rate. CONCLUSION: The classical approach described by Wiltse is essentially minimally invasive, sparing both the muscle planes and soft tissues, allowing for ample far lateral lumbar decompression, including discectomy and fusion, with a low complication rate.

Total En Bloc Spondylectomy for Lumbar Spinal Tumors by Paraspinal Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To report and describe a modified posterior-only approach (paraspinal approach) for total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of lumbar spinal tumors. METHODS: From February 2013 to June 2014, 5 patients with lumbar spinal tumors who underwent TES through a posterior-only paraspinal approach were studied retrospectively; operative time, blood loss, complications, neurologic outcomes, and degree of resection were recorded to evaluate the efficacy of this surgical method. RESULTS: Patients included 3 men and 2 women with a mean age of 48.4 years (range, 46-52 years). Two lesions were located in L2, 2 lesions were located in L3, and 1 lesion was located in L4. Three patients had solitary metastatic tumors (lung cancer in 2 cases, breast cancer in 1 case), and 2 patients had primary tumors (osteosarcoma and plasma cell tumor). According to the surgical classification of spinal tumors by Tomita et al., 4 cases were type 4 and 1 case was type 1. Mean operative time was 464 minutes (range, 420-510 minutes), and mean blood loss was 1280 mL (range, 1000-1500 mL). One patient had cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and 1 had transient motor weakness because of nerve root traction. Mean follow-up time was 20.6 months (range, 12-30 months), and all patients had improved or stable neurologic function. No local recurrence was observed at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior-only paraspinal approach is a valid alternative for TES of lumbar spinal tumors, especially for overweight or muscular patients.

Comparison of Wiltse's paraspinal approach and open book laminectomy for thoracolumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Posterior short-segment pedicle screw fixation is used to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. However, no randomized controlled studies have compared the efficacy of the two approaches--the Wiltse's paraspinal approach and open book laminectomy in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine without neurological deficit were randomized to receive either the Wiltse's paraspinal approach (group A, 24 patients) or open book laminectomy (group B, 23 patients). Patients were followed postoperatively for average of 27.4 months. Clinical and radiographic data of the two approaches were collected and compared. RESULTS: Our results showed the anterior segmental height, kyphotic angle, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and Smiley-Webster Scale (SWS) score significantly improved postoperatively in both groups, indicating that both the Wiltse's paraspinal approach and open book laminectomy can effectively treat thoracolumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures. The Wiltse's paraspinal approach was found to have significantly shorter operating time, less blood loss, and shorter length of hospital stay compared to open book laminectomy. However, there were two (2/24) patients in group A that had neurological deficits postoperatively and required a second exploratory operation. Dural tears and/or cauda equina entrapment were subsequently found in four patients in group B and all two patients of neurological deficits in group A during operation. No screw loosening, plate breakage, or other internal fixation failures were found at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that either of the two surgical approaches can achieve satisfactory results in treating thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients with greenstick lamina fractures. However, if there is any clinical or radiographic suspicion of a dural tear and/or cauda equina entrapment pre-operation, patients should receive an open book laminectomy to avoid a second exploratory operation. More research is still needed to optimize clinical decision-making regarding surgical approach.

Clinical Outcome of Minimally Invasive Decompression Without Discectomy in Contained Foraminal Disc Herniation: A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Foraminal disc herniation is rare. When conservative treatment fails, it is often treated with discectomy via a paraspinal or Wiltse approach. In contained foraminal disc herniation, more symptoms arise from the foraminal compression of the exiting nerve root, including the dorsal root ganglion, than from the herniation itself. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of stand-alone decompression without discectomy for patients with contained foraminal disc herniation. METHODS: This study included 17 patients with unilateral single-level foraminal disc herniation (14 women and 3 men; mean age, 62.8 ± 14.6 years, range, 37-86 years). Disc herniation was confirmed as contained by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography and by intraoperative exploration. All patients underwent thorough decompression without discectomy, via a paraspinal approach. Pain was evaluated preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively using a visual analog scale (VAS). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Macnab criteria were used to evaluate final outcomes. RESULTS: The most commonly affected level was L5-S1. All 17 patients showed significant improvements in VAS and ODI scores at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. According to the Macnab criteria, outcome results were excellent in 13 patients and good in 4. The mean duration of follow-up was 18.4 ± 2.4 months, with no recurrences or lumbar instability at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Stand-alone decompression without discectomy is an effective method for relieving symptoms and preserving the disc in contained foraminal disc herniation. A minimally invasive approach with thorough decompression techniques yields good results.

Postoperative Clinical Outcome and Risk Factors for Poor Outcome of Foraminal and Extraforaminal Lumbar Disc Herniation.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated postoperative outcomes in patients who have lumbar foraminal or extraforaminal disc herniation (FELDH) and suggested the risk factors for poor outcomes. METHODS: A total of 234 patients were selected for this study. Pre- and post-operative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Korean version Oswestry Disability Index (KODI) were evaluated and the changes of both score were calculated. Outcome was defined as excellent, good, fair, and poor based on Mcnab classification. The percentage of superior facetectomy was calculated by using the Maro-view 5.4 Picture Archiving Communication System (PACS). RESULTS: Paramedian lumbar discectomy was performed in 180 patients and combined lumbar discectomy was performed in 54 patients. Paramedian lumbar discectomy group showed better outcome compared with combined discectomy group. p value of VAS change was 0.009 and KODI was 0.013. The average percentage of superior facetectomy was 33% (range, 0-79%) and it showed negative correlation with VAS and KODI changes (Pearson coefficient : -0.446 and -0.498, respectively). Excellent or good outcome cases (Group I) were 136 (58.1%) and fair or poor outcome cases (Group II) were 98 (41.9%). The percentage of superior facetectomy was 26.5% at Group I and 42.5% at Group II. There was significant difference in superior facetectomy percentage between Group I and II (p=0.000). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that paramedian lumbar discectomy with preservation of facet joints is an effective and good procedure for FELDH. At least 60% of facet should be preserved for excellent or good outcomes.

Three-Years Outcome of Microdiscectomy via Paramedian Approach for Lumbar Foraminal or Extraforaminal Disc Herniations in Elderly Patients over 65 Years Old.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar foraminal or extraforaminal disc herniations (FEFDH) have unusual clinical features and higher incidence in elderly patients compared to usual intraspinal canal disc herniations. We evaluated the efficacy of microdiscectomy via paramedian approach for lumbar FEFDH in elderly patients over the age of 65. METHODS: Retrospective study was performed in 68 patients over the age of 65 (23 male and 45 female patients; 71.46±3.87 years) who underwent microdiscectomy via paramedian approach for unilateral lumbar FEFDH causing sciatica. The radiological factors including degree of slippage, presence of instability, disc height, and degree of disc degeneration; pain and functional status by the means of visual analogue scale score, Oswestry Disability Index score, and Macnab classification were analyzed preoperatively and during the postoperative follow-up period of 3 years to evaluate the efficacy of the surgical treatment. RESULTS: Pain and functional status improved according to short- and long-term follow-up evaluations after surgery. Radiological changes following surgery, which can be understood as structural deteriorations and deformations, did not represent patient condition. Nine patients underwent additional surgery due to sustained or recurring leg pain of aggravation of back pain, and fusion surgery was required for 3 patients. Degree of preoperative slippage was the only statistically significant factor related to additional surgery (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Microdiscectomy via paramedian approach for FEFDH may be a good surgical alternative in elderly patients. Radiological changes after surgery did not show a concordance with patients' actual functional status. The excessive preoperative slippage tended to lead to unfavorable result after surgery and was associated with additional surgery.

Transpedicular bone grafting and pedicle screw fixation in injured vertebrae using a paraspinal approach for thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Complications in posterior pedicle screw fixation using a conventional posterior approach for thoracolumbar fractures include vertebral height loss, kyphosis relapse and breakage, or loosening of instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effects of transpedicular bone grafting and pedicle screw fixation in injured vertebrae using a paraspinal approach for thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 50 patients with thoracolumbar fractures treated with transpedicular bone grafting and pedicle screw fixation in injured vertebrae using a paraspinal approach. Operative time, blood loss, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back pain, and the relative height and Cobb angle of the fractured vertebrae were measured. RESULTS: The average operative time was 71.8 min, and the blood loss was 155 ml. Postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower than preoperative scores (P = 0.08), but there was no difference between 1 week and 1 year postoperatively (P = 0.18). The postoperative relative heights of the fractured vertebrae were higher than the preoperative heights (P = 0.001, 0.005, 0.001), but there were no differences between 1 week and 1 or 2 years postoperatively (P = 0.24/0.16). The postoperative Cobb angles were larger than the preoperative angles (P = 0.002, 0.007, 0.001), but there were no differences between 1 week and 1 or 2 years postoperatively (P = 0.19/0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Transpedicular bone grafting and pedicle screw fixation in injured vertebrae using a paraspinal approach for thoracolumbar fractures achieved satisfactory results and can restore vertebral height, increase the stability of the anterior and middle columns of injured vertebrae, and decrease the risk of back pain.

Abordaje paraespinal de Wiltse: nota técnica y revisión de sus ventajas y limitaciones / Wiltse paraspinal approach: technical note and review of its advantages and limitations

Objetivo: Describir paso a paso el abordaje paraespinal de Wiltse y resaltar las principales ventajas y limitaciones relatadas en la literatura. Material y métodos: Se realizó una descripción del abordaje de Wiltse paso a paso y detalladamente paso a paso, haciendo hincapié en algunos trucos y limitaciones adquiridos con la práctica. Se revisó la literatura disponible con una búsqueda en PubMed y Lilacs bajo los términos Mesh: "Wiltse approach", "paraspinal approach", "muscle sparing approach", "lumbar spine", para destacar ventajas y desventajas de la técnica. Se analizaron 10 trabajos que tenían relación con el objetivo de esta publicación. Ninguno de los trabajos hallados en la búsqueda describía en detalle los pasos del abordaje paraespinal. Se describió: preparación, posicionamiento, incisión, apertura fascial, disección, identificación ósea, desperiostización, descompresión, discectomía, instrumentación, artrodesis y cierre. Resultados: La mayoría de los trabajos resaltaron la utilidad del abordaje como técnica de mínima invasión, con sangrado intraoperatorio mínimo, cortas estadías hospitalarias y bajo índice de infecciones. Conclusión: El abordaje clásico descripto por Wiltse sigue los principios de cirugía de mínima invasión, respetando los planos musculares y tejidos blandos paraespinales, permitiendo amplias descompresiones, discectomías y fusiones con bajos índices de complicaciones.

Objective: To provide a step-by-step description of the Wiltse paraspinal approach, and analyze the main advantages and limitations described in the literature. Methods: We provide a detailed step-by-step description of the Wiltse approach, focusing on some of the strategies we have learned and limitations we have seen in daily clinical practice. A literature review was conducted, consisting of Pub Med and Lilacs searches using the Mesh terms: "Wiltse approach", "paraspinal approach", "muscle sparing approach", and "lumbar spine". Ten papers related to our objectives were assessed, step by step considering patient preparation and positioning, skin incisions, fascial opening, dissection, bone identification, retraction, deperiostization, decompression, discectomy, instrumentation, arthrodesis, and closure. Results: Most papers underline the usefulness of the Wiltse paraspinal approach as a minimally-invasive procedure, emphasizing the minimal intra-operative bleeding, short hospital stays, and low infection rates. However, none of the identified papers thoroughly described specific steps taken using this approach. Conclusion: The classical approach described by Wiltse observes the principles of minimally-invasive surgical procedures, sparing both the muscle planes and soft tissues, thereby allowing for ample decompression, discectomies, and spinal fusions with low complication rates.

Paraspinal Lumbar Spine Approach - Wiltse Access

Introduction Technical developments in spinal surgery have reduced the number of surgical incisions and of the length of time for the procedure. Objective Describe topographical landmarks, anatomy and characteristics of the Wiltse access, a paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Methods A review of the literature was performed using as databases: PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, the Cochran Database and Google Scholar. Total 22 papers met the inclusion criteria, and they were all published between 1959 and 2016. Discussion The Wiltse approach is performed by median skin incision with lateral muscle dissection between the multifidus and the longissimus muscles, in a natural pathway. This approach allows access to the pedicles and to the lateral recess, enabling the performance of posterior spinal fusion and decompression and minimally invasive discectomy techniques. This access is less traumatic than the median approach, and it is ideal for lower levels, like L4­5 and L5-S1. Conclusion The authors strongly encourage this approach because they believe that, when well-indicated, the benefits outweigh the disadvantages and complications due to the fact that it is a less invasive procedure.

Introdução Os desenvolvimentos técnicos na cirurgia da coluna vertebral têm proporcionado a redução das incisões cirúrgicas e da duração do procedimento. Objetivo Descrever marcos topográficos, anatômicos e características do acesso de Wiltse, uma abordagem da coluna vertebral lombar. Métodos A revisão bibliográfica foi realizada utilizando como banco de dados: PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, banco de dados Cochran e Google Scholar. Foram encontrados 22 trabalhos que atenderam aos critérios de inclusão, todos publicados entre 1959 e 2016. Discussão A abordagem de Wiltse é realizada pela incisão cutânea mediana com dissecção muscular lateral entre o músculo multifidus e o músculo longissimus, na via natural. Esta abordagem permite o acesso aos pedículos e ao recesso lateral, e a realização de fusão posterior e descompressão de fratura da coluna vertebral e técnicas de discectomia minimamente invasivas. Este acesso é menos traumático do que a abordagem mediana, e é ideal para níveis mais baixos, como L4­5 e L5-S1. Conclusão Os autores recomendam esta abordagem, pois acreditam que os benefícios desta técnica, quando bem indicada, superam as desvantagens e complicações por ser esta menos invasiva.

Wiltse paraspinal muscle splitting approach for treatment of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis / 中华全科医师杂志

Forty three patients with L5-S1 spondylolisthesis undergoing surgical treatment from April 2012 to November 2014 were included for analysis,including 20 cases received transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF group) and 23 cased received posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF group).The incision length,operative time were shorter and blood loss was less in TLIF group than those in PLIF group [(9.6±0.9) vs.(16.1±1.5) cm,(125.6±13.0) vs.(156.4±11.8) minand (218.7±22.5)ml vs.(326.5 ±20.1) ml,respectively,all P =0.000].There was no statistical difference in the S1 pedicle screw (S1PS) insertion point between two approaches[(29.4 ± 1.9) vs.(28.5 ± 1.0) mm,P =0.069],but the distance from the midline to the lateral edge of the screw (12.9 ±3.6) mm,S1PS angle (23.3 ±2.1) ° and length of S1PS length with the sacral body (40.9 ± 2.6) mm in the TLIF group were better than those in PLIF group (P =0.000).Our results demonstrate that the paraspinal muscle approach for the treatment of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis may be superior with less trauma,better functional recovery and stable screw placement.