Medical emergencies in a dental school clinic - A 12-year review and lessons learned.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to estimate the type and frequency of different medical emergencies that occurred over the study period (twelve years) and discuss the lessons learned and the modifications made in the curriculum to better equip dental students and faculty in their management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate all medical emergencies that needed activation of the response team at our school from 2008 to 2020. RESULTS: The emergency response system was activated 250 times during the 12-year period. There were 132 medical emergencies in the pre-doctoral clinic and 105 events in the post-doctoral clinic (p 0.0680). Most of the emergencies occurred in patients between 45 and 64 years of age. Syncope occurs most often followed by adverse cardiovascular, respiratory, anxiety, and hypoglycemic events. CONCLUSIONS: Medical emergencies occurring in a dental school provide a unique opportunity for students to gain experience in their management. The key lies in preparing the students and faculty to prevent them from occurring, but should these occur, then they should be able to promptly recognize symptoms and institute prompt intervention.

Variation in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at US dental school clinics.

PURPOSE: Although the threat of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was the same at different US dental schools, the response wasn't. There is no study that documents the variation in mitigation strategies, COVID-19 transmission, and clinical educational changes at US Dental schools during the ongoing pandemic that began in 2020 in the US. METHODS: The current study was approved as exempt research (project number HUM00199261). Our survey of Associate Dean's of Clinical Operations was individually emailed in July 2021. There were no reminders and descriptive statistics were calculated using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: We received 46 completed surveys from the 68 sent out. Note that 65.2% of respondents reported requiring N95 masks for aerosol-generating procedures. Note that 38.9% of respondents said they required student partnering as chairside dental assistants for aerosol-generating procedures. Note that 37.7% of respondents began using alternate cubicles. A total of 6.52% of schools reported a transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus from patient to provider. There were no reported transmissions from provider to patient or from patient to patient. CONCLUSION: In our study, we found a lot of similarities between the approach taken by Dental School Clinics across the US to mitigate the risks of COVID-19, however, we also observed many differences.

CODA standard 2-24 h-"replacement of teeth" dilemma: Unintended consequences and proposed solutions.

BACKGROUND: The Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) was established in 1975 with the goal of serving the public and the dental profession by developing and implementing standards that guide and maintain the quality of dental educational programs. These standards are defined broadly around competencies reflective of an evidence-based definition of general dentistry and that should be met by the new graduates to function as an entry level provider. Consequently, CODA "expects each school to develop specific competency definitions and assessment methods in the context of the broad scope of general dental practice". CODA Standard 2-24 h was implemented a decade ago to address concerns that dental schools are not sufficiently proactive in incorporating implant-related curricula and clinical competencies. When the standard was implemented, most patients already preferred dental implants over FPDs. This market trend, together with the prescriptive format of the standard, had the unintended consequence of creating pressure on programs that struggled to find enough patients who will chose FPDs as a treatment option. DISCUSSION: As a short term solution, we suggest a tooth replacement competency construct that has the potential to alleviate this burden. This solution incorporates principles of ethical decision making, patient-centered care, and evidence-based dentistry, without compromising educational aspects and competency development. For the longer term, we suggested to revise and rephrase the standard so that it will be clinically-centered rather than focused on technical tools that may evolve, change, or disappear as a result of technological progress and other market trends. This, in turn, will be conducive to fulfill the intent of Standard 2-24 to allow the schools to identify "competencies that will be included in the curriculum based on the school's goals, resources, accepted general practitioner responsibilities and other influencing factors."

The fear of letting go and the Ivory Tower of dental educational training.

ISSUE: Clinical training in dental education is complex and happens mostly within a well-controlled environment such as a university dental clinic where oral health care services are delivered; it is mostly student-centered. While such training is important, it is also possible to augment and enhance it by training predoctoral dental students outside such a clinic within off-site community-based placements using a more person-centered approach. However, there seems to exist a reluctance in recognizing and utilizing the work produced in these off-site placements holistically as an integral part of students' clinical assessment. APPROACH: Community-based clinical experience adds value to the training of our predoctoral dental students. This perspective describes the benefits of community placements and recognizes their importance in the clinical and professional development of a future graduate. It also presents a way to assess students' performance that by-and-large mirrors that of the university dental clinic while striking a balance between student-centered education and person-centered care. IMPACT: In this perspective, we argue that the clinical work delivered at a community placement ought to be weighted equitably with the clinical work delivered at a university clinic when assessing students' competency as a whole. Our message is to keep a balance of student-centered education and person-centered care to the benefit of all those involved.

Simulation design and students' satisfaction with home-based simulation learning in oral health therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic presents a challenging situation for dental education, with school closures worldwide. While practical sessions are important for the acquisition of clinical skills, few studies have examined the role of home-based simulation learning (HBSL). This study aims to identify key aspects of simulation design and factors associated with students' satisfaction with HBSL. METHODS: During a "circuit-breaker" period in Singapore, the Nanyang Polytechnic School of Health & Social Sciences (Oral Health Therapy) distributed portable manikins and instruments to students and staff for use at home. Synchronous teaching sessions with real-time feedback were carried out over the Zoom teleconferencing platform. A cross-sectional survey of students was conducted after 3 weeks of the HBSL program. Multiple linear regression analyses were carried out to assess the association between satisfaction with domains of simulation design and overall satisfaction with HBSL. RESULTS: The top three factors of importance to students in HBSL were feedback and guided reflection, support, and objectives and information. Final-year students expressed higher levels of overall satisfaction and self-confidence following HBSL than first-year students. Satisfaction with the objectives (ß = 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.57), support (ß = 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.42), and problem-solving (ß = 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.46) domains in the Simulation Design Scale were positively associated with overall student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. CONCLUSION: The findings can aid educators in the design of future HBSL programs, with a focus on areas of simulation design that are of importance to students.

Pre-doctoral special healthcare needs education: Lost in a crowded curriculum.

We explored academicians' experiences with pre-doctoral special healthcare needs (SHCN) education using one-on-one interviews with academic leaders. We assessed their personal experience with SHCN, the current state of SHCN education at their institution, and their opinions about SHCN education in the pre-doctoral curriculum. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive framework to identify emerging themes. Twelve faculty members were interviewed from 10 institutions. All participants acknowledged that the bulk of their training and experience treating patients with SHCN occurred during residency. Participants identified inconsistent pre-doctoral SHCN curricular experiences attributed to time constraints imposed by an increasingly crowded curriculum. Questions remain regarding the place of SHCN education in future pre-doctoral curricula, as well as how to create sustainable systems and programs for dental graduates to gain this experience.