Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Respirology ; 22(3): 567-574, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28225162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Mandibular movements (MMs) and position during sleep reflect respiratory efforts related to increases in upper airway resistance and micro-arousals. The study objective was to assess whether MM identifies sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with moderate to high pre-test probability. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 87 consecutive patients referred for an in-laboratory sleep test. Magnetometer-derived MM signals were incorporated into standard polysomnography (PSG). Respiratory events detected with MM analysis were compared with PSG for respiratory disturbance index (RDI) with a blinded scoring. All records were scored manually according to American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules. Primary outcome was to rule-in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) defined as RDI cut-off value ≥5 or 15/h total sleep time (TST). RESULTS: High concordance emerged between MM and PSG-derived RDI with high temporal coincidence between events (R2 = 0.906; P < 0.001). The mean diagnostic accuracy of MM for OSAS using RDI MM cut-off values of 5.9 and 13.5 was 0.935 (0.86-0.97) and 0.913 (0.84-0.95), with a mean positive likelihood ratio (LLR+) of 3.73 (2.7-20.4) and 8.46 (2.3-31.5), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves at PSG cut-off values of 5 and 15/h TST had areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.89-0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99) (P < 0.001), respectively. MM analysis accurately identified SDB at different levels of severity. CONCLUSION: RDI assessed by MM is highly concordant with PSG, suggesting a role of ambulatory MM recordings to screen for SDB in patients with moderate to high pre-test probability.


Asunto(s)
Mandíbula/fisiopatología , Movimiento , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Área Bajo la Curva , Femenino , Humanos , Magnetometría , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Ambulatorio , Polisomnografía , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sueño/fisiología , Adulto Joven
2.
Front Neurol ; 13: 1043413, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36619927

RESUMEN

Introduction: Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a common and serious comorbidity mainly occurring in patients with heart failure (HF), which tends to be underdiagnosed and has not been widely studied. Overnight polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for diagnosing CSA; however, the time and expense of the procedure limit its applicability. Portable monitoring (PM) devices are convenient and easy to use; however, they have not been widely studied as to their effectiveness in detecting CSA in patients with HF. In the current study, we examined the diagnostic value of PM as a screening tool to identify instances of CSA among patients with HF. Methods: A total of 22 patients under stable heart failure conditions with an ejection fraction of <50% were enrolled. All patients underwent PM and overnight PSG within a narrow time frame. The measurements of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), hypopnea index (HI), central apnea index (CAI), and obstructive apnea index (OAI) obtained from PSG, automatic scoring, and manual scoring of PM were recorded. The results obtained from PSG and those from PM (automatic and manual scoring) were compared to assess the accuracy of PM. Results: Among the patients, CSA in 11 patients was found by PSG. The AHI measurements performed using manual scoring of PM showed a significant correlation with those performed using PSG (r = 0.69; P = 0.01). Nonetheless, mean AHI measurements showed statistically significant differences between PSG and automatic scoring of PM (40.0 vs. 23.7 events/hour, respectively; P < 0.001), as well as between automatic and manual scoring of PM (23.7 vs. 29.5 events/hour; P < 0.001). Central sleep apnea was detected by PM; however, the results were easily misread as obstructive apnea, particularly in automatic scoring. Conclusion: PM devices could be used to identify instances of central sleep apnea among patients with HF. The results from PM were well-correlated with standard PSG results, and manual scoring was preferable to automated scoring.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda