RESUMEN
Assessment of genotoxic and carcinogenic potential is considered one of the basic requirements when evaluating possible human health risks associated with exposure to chemicals. Test strategies currently in place focus primarily on identifying genotoxic potential due to the strong association between the accumulation of genetic damage and cancer. Using genotoxicity assays to predict carcinogenic potential has the significant drawback that risks from non-genotoxic carcinogens remain largely undetected unless carcinogenicity studies are performed. Furthermore, test systems already developed to reduce animal use are not easily accepted and implemented by either industries or regulators. This manuscript reviews the test methods for cancer hazard identification that have been adopted by the regulatory authorities, and discusses the most promising alternative methods that have been developed to date. Based on these findings, a generally applicable tiered test strategy is proposed that can be considered capable of detecting both genotoxic as well as non-genotoxic carcinogens and will improve understanding of the underlying mode of action. Finally, strengths and weaknesses of this new integrative test strategy for cancer hazard identification are presented.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad/métodos , Animales , Bioensayo , Pruebas de Carcinogenicidad/normas , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Daño del ADN , Humanos , Pruebas de Mutagenicidad/métodos , Pruebas de Mutagenicidad/normas , Mutágenos/toxicidad , Neoplasias , Medición de Riesgo/métodosRESUMEN
Regulatory toxicology urgently needs applicable alternative test systems that reduce animal use, testing time, and cost. European regulation on cosmetic ingredients has already banned animal experimentation for hazard identification, and public awareness drives toward additional restrictions in other regulatory frameworks as well. In addition, scientific progress stimulates a more mechanistic approach of hazard identification. Nevertheless, the implementation of alternative methods is lagging far behind their development. In search for general bottlenecks for the implementation of alternative methods, this manuscript reviews the state of the art as to the development and implementation of 10 diverse test systems in various areas of toxicological hazard assessment. They vary widely in complexity and regulatory acceptance status. The assays are reviewed as to parameters assessed, biological system involved, standardization, interpretation of results, extrapolation to human hazard, position in testing strategies, and current regulatory acceptance status. Given the diversity of alternative methods in many aspects, no common bottlenecks could be identified that hamper implementation of individual alternative assays in general. However, specific issues for the regulatory acceptance and application were identified for each assay. Acceptance of one-in-one replacement of complex in vivo tests by relatively simple in vitro assays is not feasible. Rather, innovative approaches using test batteries are required together with metabolic information and in vitro to in vivo dose extrapolation to convincingly provide the same level of information of current in vivo tests. A mechanistically based alternative approach using the Adverse Outcome Pathway concept could stimulate further (regulatory) acceptance of non-animal tests.
Asunto(s)
Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/métodos , Sustancias Peligrosas/toxicidad , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Humanos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
Organs-on-chip (OC) have gained much interest as animal-free toxicity testing methods due to their closer resemblance to human tissues and longer culture viability than conventional in vitro methods. The current paper discusses where and how OCs may take a role in the transition to a more predictive, animal-free safety assessment for regulatory purposes. From a preliminary analysis of a repeated dose toxicity database, ten organs of priority for OC development for regulatory use have been identified. For a number of these organs (lung, skin, liver, kidney, heart, and intestine), OCs are already at rather advanced stages of development, such that involvement of regulators becomes of value in the optimization towards fitness-for-purpose of these methods. For organs such as testis, spleen, brain, and stomach, OCs are much more premature, if existing at all. Therefore, developmental work on OCs for these latter organs is expected to stay in the academic arena for the coming time. A number of technical recommendations and some challenges to reaching final implementation are discussed. We recommend that the development of OCs goes forward together with the development of adverse outcome pathways (AOP) and that they are combined with other methods into integrated testing strategies. Overall, opportunities exist, but much still needs to be done. In our view, regular interactions in multi-stakeholder workshops on the application of animal-free innovations such as OCs will be beneficial.
Asunto(s)
Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales , Técnicas In Vitro , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Animales , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con MedicamentosRESUMEN
Assessment of genotoxic potential is an important step in the safety evaluation of chemical substances. Under most regulatory jurisdictions, the first tier of testing comprises a standard battery of in vitro genotoxicity tests in bacterial and mammalian cells. However, the mammalian cell tests commonly used exhibit a relatively high rate of misleading positive results, which may lead to unnecessary in vivo testing. We previously established a proof-of-concept for the LacZ reporter assay in proliferating primary hepatocytes as a promising alternative genotoxicity test. Here, cryopreserved instead of freshly isolated hepatocytes were used and the assay was evaluated in more detail. We examined the effect of cryopreservation on phenotype and metabolic capacity of the LacZ hepatocytes, and assessed the predictive performance of the assay by testing a set of substances comprising true positive, true negative, and misleading positive substances. Additionally, a historical negative control database was created and the type of mutations induced was analyzed for two of the substances tested. Our findings indicate that proliferating cryopreserved primary hepatocytes derived from LacZ plasmid mice retain their hepatocyte-specific characteristics and metabolic competence. Furthermore, we demonstrate that both gene mutations and genome rearrangements due to large deletions can be detected with the LacZ reporter assay. The assay seems to have a lower rate of misleading positive test results compared to the assays currently used. Together, our findings strongly support the use of the LacZ reporter assay in cryopreserved primary hepatocytes as follow-up to the standard in vitro test battery for genotoxicity testing. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 57:643-655, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.