Impact of ribavirin dosage in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with simeprevir, pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy.

The factors associated with sustained virologic response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) genotype 1 patients treated with simeprevir (SMV), pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) triple therapy have not been fully investigated. Two hundred and twenty-nine treatment-naïve CH-C patients treated with SMV triple therapy were enrolled in this study. The overall SVR rate was 87% in per-protocol analysis. In multivariate analysis, the interleukin (IL) 28B genotype (rs8099917, TT vs. non-TT, odds ratio [OR]: 0.044, P = 0.001) and RBV dose (< 10/10-12/ ≥ 12 mg/kg/day, OR: 4.513, P = 0.041) were significant factors associated with SVR. In patients with the IL28B non-TT genotype, RBV dose affected SVR dose-dependently in stratified analysis of RBV dose (P = 0.015); it was 44% (8/18) for patients administered <10 mg/kg/day of RBV, 78% (14/18) for those administered 10-12 mg/kg/day of RBV, and 100% (3/3) for those administered ≥12 mg/kg/day of RBV, whereas in patients with the IL28B TT genotype, a significant correlation between SVR and RBV dose was not observed (P = 0.229). Regarding RBV dose reduction of less than 10 mg/kg/day, the inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) genotype (rs1127354, CC vs. non-CC, OR: 0.239, P = 0.003) and age (by 1 y.o., OR: 1.084, P = 0.002) were significant independent factors. RBV dosage affected SVR dose-dependently in patients with the IL28B non-TT genotype treated with SMV triple therapy. Special attention to anemia progression and RBV dosage should be paid to aged patients with the ITPA CC genotype. J. Med. Virol. 88:1776-1784, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

In routine clinical practice, few physicians use early viral kinetics to guide HCV dual therapy treatment decisions.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: PROPHESYS is a large, multinational, non-interventional prospective cohort study of chronic hepatitis C patients treated with peginterferon alfa/ribavirin. This subanalysis assesses rates of premature treatment discontinuation stratified by on-treatment virological response (VR). METHODS: This PROPHESYS subanalysis is restricted to treatment-naive, hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (G)1/2/3 mono-infected patients who received peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD)/ribavirin with intended treatment duration of 48 (G1) or 24 weeks (G2/3). Early virological responses were classified into four mutually exclusive categories [rapid VR (RVR), complete early VR (cEVR), partial EVR (pEVR), no RVR/EVR], using standard criteria. RESULTS: The likelihood for shortening treatment owing to good efficacy was highest among patients with an RVR and HCV RNA≤400 000 IU/ml (G1 10.0%; G2/3 5.8%) whereas for poor efficacy, it was highest in G1 non-RVR/EVR patients with HCV RNA>400 000 IU/ml (56.6%). Factors significantly associated with early treatment discontinuation as a result of good efficacy in G1 patients included RVR vs. no RVR/EVR and, at baseline, lower HCV RNA, lower FIB-4 score, HCV infection via injection drug use. For G2/3 patients, factors included lower baseline HCV RNA and G2 vs. G3 infection. Most patients started with the recommended peginterferon alfa-2a dose, but a high proportion received a higher-than-recommended ribavirin dose. CONCLUSIONS: Despite international guidelines, few physicians used early viral kinetics to abbreviate treatment. Therefore, relatively few patients with an RVR and low baseline HCV RNA abbreviated treatment. In addition, there were deviations in ribavirin starting doses, suggesting that physicians tailor treatment according to local guidelines or previous experience.

Pharmacokinetics-Based Adjusted Versus Standard Dose of Ribavirin Does Not Improve Virologic Response Rates in Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 4 Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Optimal doses of Ribavirin (RBV) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment are not known. To assess the safety and efficacy of PegIFNalfa-2a in combination with an adjusted (ADJ) RBV dose based on early pharmacokinetics versus a fixed standard (STD) dose of RBV in chronic HCV genotype (GT) 4-naive patients in a randomized trial. One hundred eighty-one patients were randomized. The baseline variables were similar in both arms and females were 50.3% of the patients, 76.5% had minimal-moderate fibrosis (F0-2). Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 99 (54.7%) subjects. SVR was seen in 50/90 (55.6%) of ADJ dose of RBV and 49/91 (53.9%) of STD dose subjects. Prematurely withdrawal or discontinuation of treatment prematurely in the ADJ RBV arm occurred in 11/90 patients (12.2%) compared with 6/91 subjects (6.6%) in the STD arm (P = 0.214). Similarly, virologic relapse was seen in 14/90 (15.6%) patients of the ADJ arm and 12/91 (13.2%) of the STD arm. Anemia grade 3-4 was seen in 36.7% in ADJ versus 17.6% in STD arm (P = 0.003). Occurrence of rapid virologic response and absences of F4 fibrosis predicted SVR in a univariate analysis. However, age, gender, weight, presence of diabetes, baseline alanine aminotransferase, and vitamin D levels were not significantly different in patients achieving SVR. ADJ higher doses of RBV based on its early pharmacokinetics-based RBV do not improve SVR rates in HCV GT4 treated in combination with peg-IFN alpha-2-a versus STD therapy. Patients on ADJ higher doses of RBV experienced higher rates of anemia and require more erythropoietin without increasing SVR.

Predictive factors for 24 weeks sustained virologic response (SVR24) and viral relapse in patients treated with simeprevir plus peginterferon and ribavirin.

BACKGROUND: Simeprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin has been used for the treatment of chronic hepatitis caused by genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV). We explored the predictive factors for sustained virological response (SVR) and viral relapse using datasets from four Japanese phase 3 studies (CONCERTO). METHODS: We used a multiple logistic regression model. First, an integrated dataset comprising 357 patients was analyzed. Subsequently, prior treatment-naïve and relapser (223 patients) and nonresponder (134 patients) of interferon-based treatment subsets were analyzed to identify predictors of SVR. A subset of nonresponders (106 patients) who were treated ≥24 weeks was also analyzed to identify predictors for viral relapse. RESULTS: In the integrated dataset, prior treatment response was significantly associated with SVR. In subset analyses, interleukin-28B (IL28B) TT genotype and undetectable plasma HCV RNA level at week 4 were associated in treatment-naïve patients and relapsers [odds ratio (OR); 4.106 and 3.701, respectively]. In the nonresponders, the IL28B TT genotype population was very small, and inosine triphosphatase (ITPA) and undetectable plasma HCV RNA at week 4 were associated (OR; 2.506 and 3.333, respectively). Furthermore, ribavirin dose intensity (RBV-DI) and detectable plasma HCV RNA at week 4 were significantly associated with viral relapse (OR; 0.327 and 2.922, respectively). CONCLUSION: IL28B and plasma HCV RNA level at week 4 were clinically relevant predictive factors for SVR in treatment-naïve patients and relapsers. Moreover, RBV-DI and plasma HCV level at week 4 were identified as relevant predictive factors for viral relapse in nonresponders.