Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Skin Res Technol ; 24(4): 630-635, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29707828

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The intradermal (ID) route for vaccination represents an effective alternative to subcutaneous (SC)/intramuscular administration to induce protective immunity. However, a critical issue associated with ID vaccination is the precise delivery of solution in the upper dermis, which ensures enhanced immunity. METHODS: We fabricated a hollow microneedle unit made of poly-glycolic acid by injection molding and bonding, and created a dedicated prototype injector. To ensure ID delivery of solution, the injected site was macroscopically and microscopically examined. Serum immunoglobulin G antibody production was measured by enzyme immunoassay and compared in groups of rats following either ID delivery with microneedles or SC administration with a 27-G stainless needle of graded vaccine doses. RESULTS: The unit used a tandem array of six microneedles, each with a side delivery hole, and a conduit inside for solution. Microneedles installed in the injector punctured the skin with the aid of a spring. Injection of solution formed a wheal due to ID distribution. Histologically, a wedge-shaped skin defect in the upper skin corresponded to each puncture site. Antibody titers following vaccinations on days 1 and 8 were significantly higher with ID injection than with SC delivery on day 15 and every 7 days thereafter until day 36 with mumps vaccination, and until day 36 with varicella vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The microneedle unit presented here delivered solution intradermally without any difficulty and evoked antibody responses against viruses even with the reduced vaccine volume. Our findings confirm promising results of ID delivery as an immunogenic option to enhance vaccination efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Inyecciones Intradérmicas/instrumentación , Vacuna contra la Parotiditis/inmunología , Agujas , Vacunación/instrumentación , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Diseño de Equipo , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Modelos Animales , Vacuna contra la Parotiditis/administración & dosificación , Ácido Poliglicólico , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley
2.
Haemophilia ; 23(6): 904-909, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28780770

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous (SQ) vaccination has emerged as standard of care in children with severe bleeding disorders to reduce unnecessary factor exposure and avoid provoking an intramuscular bleed, but little is known about comparative immunogenicity to intramuscular (IM) vaccination. AIM: To confirm immunogenicity of Diphtheria Tetanus acellular Pertussis (DTaP) vaccines administered SQ to individuals <6 years old with haemophilia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective and prospective pilot study of tetanus and diphtheria antibody titres among patients evaluated at our Haemophilia Treatment Centre between 2015-2016. Children with haemophilia who had received three to four doses of DTaP containing vaccine administered SQ were eligible. RESULTS: Eight children met inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of diphtheria and tetanus antibody testing was 21.1±17.8 months. All children who received SQ diphtheria and tetanus developed a positive antibody titre to both antigens. There was no statistically significant difference in distribution of titre values. The average time between the last dose of vaccine and antibody testing was 6.6±3.9 months among SQ vaccinated subjects. Minor injection site reactions were common with SQ vaccines. CONCLUSION: SQ administration of diphtheria and tetanus vaccination appears to be immunogenic in a pilot study of Haemophilia patients and supports this practice as the standard of care for this population.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/inmunología , Hemofilia A/inmunología , Hemofilia B/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/inmunología , Preescolar , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Lactante , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto
3.
Microbiol Immunol ; 59(9): 533-44, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26249788

RESUMEN

Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a major threat to human health and to the mink industry. Thus, development of vaccines that elicit robust humoral and cellular immunity against P. aeruginosa is greatly needed. In this study, a recombinant attenuated Salmonella vaccine (RASV) that expresses the outer membrane proteins fusion OprF190-342 -OprI21-83 (F1I2) from P. aeruginosa was constructed and the potency of this vaccine candidate assessed by measuring F1I2-specific humoral immune responses upon vaccination through s.c. or oral routes. S.C. administration achieved higher serum IgG titers and IgA titers in the intestine and induced stronger F1I2-specific IgG and IgA titers in lung homogenate than did oral administration, which resulted in low IgG titers and no local IgA production. High titers of IFN-γ, IL-4, and T-lymphocyte subsets induced a mixed Th1/Th2 response in mice immunized s.c., indicating elicitation of cellular immunity. Importantly, when immunized mice were challenged with P. aeruginosa by the intranasal route 30 days after the initial immunization, s.c. vaccination achieved 77.78% protection, in contrast to 41.18% via oral administration and 66.67% via Escherichia coli-expressed F1I2 (His-F1I2) vaccination. These results indicate that s.c. vaccination provides a better protective response against P. aeruginosa infection than do oral administration and the His-F1I2 vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/inmunología , Portadores de Fármacos , Lipoproteínas/inmunología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la Infección por Pseudomonas/inmunología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/inmunología , Salmonella typhimurium/genética , Administración Oral , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/análisis , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Escherichia coli , Femenino , Inmunoglobulina A/análisis , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Interferón gamma/metabolismo , Interleucina-4/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/inmunología , Lipoproteínas/genética , Pulmón/inmunología , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Visón , Vacunas contra la Infección por Pseudomonas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Infección por Pseudomonas/genética , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Salmonella/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Salmonella/genética , Salmonella typhimurium/crecimiento & desarrollo , Suero/inmunología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Atenuadas/genética , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología
4.
JMA J ; 7(1): 111-113, 2024 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38314405

RESUMEN

In Japan, inactivated vaccines, including the influenza vaccine, are administered subcutaneously, which is contrary to global recommendations for intramuscular injections. This practice is attributed to historical medical incidents and unchallenged conventions. However, this outdated method, which differs from that of international standards and is linked with less immunogenicity and more adverse reactions, may contribute to vaccination hesitancy. Therefore, with the adoption of intramuscular vaccination administration, which was widely adopted in the coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination, a shift in the Japanese health policy to conform to international standards potentially improves vaccine acceptance and effectiveness.

5.
Front Microbiol ; 14: 1212179, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37293233

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has resulted in over 6.7 million deaths worldwide. COVID-19 vaccines administered parenterally via intramuscular or subcutaneous (SC) routes have reduced the severity of respiratory infections, hospitalization rates, and overall mortality. However, there is a growing interest in developing mucosally delivered vaccines to further enhance the ease and durability of vaccination. This study compared the immune response in hamsters immunized with live SARS-CoV-2 virus via SC or intranasal (IN) routes and assessed the outcome of a subsequent IN SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Results showed that SC-immunized hamsters elicited a dose-dependent neutralizing antibody response but of a significantly lower magnitude than that observed in IN-immunized hamsters. The IN challenge with SARS-CoV-2 in SC-immunized hamsters resulted in body weight loss, increased viral load, and lung pathology than that observed in IN-immunized and IN-challenged counterparts. These results demonstrate that while SC immunization renders some degree of protection, IN immunization induces a stronger immune response and better protection against respiratory SARS-CoV-2 infection. Overall, this study provides evidence that the route of primary immunization plays a critical role in determining the severity of a subsequent respiratory infection caused by SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, the findings suggest that IN route of immunization may be a more effective option for COVID-19 vaccines than the currently used parenteral routes. Understanding the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 elicited via different immunization routes may help guide more effective and long-lasting vaccination strategies.

6.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 8(2)2020 Apr 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32268574

RESUMEN

Following the successful eradication of rinderpest, the World Organization of Animal Health (OIE) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) have set a goal to eradicate peste des petits ruminants (PPR) globally by 2030. Vaccination is being taken forward as the key strategy along with epidemiological surveillance to target vaccination efforts and eradicate the disease. PPR is highly contagious and is generally spread by aerosolized droplets and close contact. Currently, two live attenuated vaccines (Nigeria 75/1 and Sungri 96) are in use, and administered subcutaneously to prevent transmission of PPR and protect vaccinated animals. Though the target cells that support primary replication of PPR vaccine strains are largely unknown, it is hypothesized that the immune response could be intensified following intranasal vaccine delivery as this route mimics the natural route of infection. This study aims to compare the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of the two currently available live attenuated PPR vaccines following subcutaneous and intranasal routes of vaccination in target species. Groups of five goats were vaccinated with live attenuated PPR vaccines (Nigeria 75/1 and Sungri 96) by either the subcutaneous or intranasal route, and 28 days later challenged intranasally with virulent PPR virus. All vaccinated animals regardless of vaccination route produced PPRV-specific antibodies post-vaccination. Following challenge, all goats were protected from clinical disease, and vaccination was considered to have induced sterilizing immunity. This study demonstrates that the intranasal route of vaccination is as effective as the subcutaneous route of vaccination when using available live attenuated PPR vaccines.

7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 12(9): 2447-55, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27135736

RESUMEN

Intradermal (ID) vaccination induces a more potent immune response and requires lower vaccine doses as compared with standard vaccination routes. To deliver ID vaccines effectively and consistently, an ID delivery device has been developed and is commercially available for adults. The clinical application of ID vaccines for infants and children is much anticipated because children receive several vaccines, on multiple occasions, during infancy and childhood. However, experience with ID vaccines is limited and present evidence is sparse and inconsistent. ID delivery devices are not currently available for infants and children, but recent studies have examined skin thickness in this population and reported that it did not differ in proportion to body size in infants, children, and adults. These results are helpful in developing new ID devices and for preparing new vaccines in infants and children.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/instrumentación , Inyecciones Intradérmicas/instrumentación , Inyecciones Intradérmicas/métodos , Vacunación/instrumentación , Vacunación/métodos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Equipos y Suministros , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda