Interactions between eosinophils and IL-5Rα-positive mast cells in nonadvanced systemic mastocytosis.

BACKGROUND: Bidirectional interactions between eosinophils and mast cells (MCs) have been reported in various allergic diseases. Bone marrow (BM) eosinophilia, and to a lesser extent blood eosinophilia, is common in systemic mastocytosis (SM), but its significance remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: We described blood and BM eosinophil characteristics in SM. METHODS: A large collection of BM biopsy samples was analyzed using immunohistochemical staining and whole-slide imaging. Eosinophil and extracellular granules were detected by eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) staining and MCs by KIT staining. Complementary analyses were conducted using flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. RESULTS: Eosinophil infiltrates and large areas of eosinophil degranulation were observed within or around BM MC infiltrates in SM. EPX staining surface, highlighting intact eosinophils and eosinophil degranulation, was higher in nonadvanced SM (n = 37 BM biopsy samples) compared with both controls (n = 8, P = .0003) and advanced SM (n = 24, P = .014). In nonadvanced SM, positive correlations were observed between serum tryptase levels and percentages of eosinophil counts in BM aspirations (Spearman r coefficient r = 0.38, P = .038), eosinophils count in BM biopsy samples (r = 0.45, P = .007), EPX staining (r = 0.37, P = .035), and eosinophil degranulation (r = 0.39, P = .023). Eosinophil counts in BM biopsy samples also correlated with MC counts (r = 0.47, P = .006) and KIT staining surface (r = 0.49, P = .003). BM MCs expressed IL-5 receptor and other usual eosinophil cytokine/chemokine receptors, and blood eosinophils displayed several increased surface markers compared with controls, suggesting an activated state. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest possible cross talk between MCs and eosinophils, supporting MC tryptase release and MC activation-related symptoms. This suggests a rationale for targeting eosinophils in nonadvanced SM not fully controlled by other therapies.

T-cell immune profile in blood of systemic mastocytosis: Association with disease features.

BACKGROUND: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by an expansion of KIT-mutated mast cells (MC). KIT-mutated MC display activated features and release MC mediators that might act on the tumour microenvironment and other immune cells. Here, we investigated the distribution of lymphocyte subsets in blood of patients with distinct subtypes of SM and determined its association with other disease features. METHODS: We studied the distribution of TCD4+ and TCD4- cytotoxic cells and their subsets, as well as total NK- and B cells, in blood of 115 SM patients-38 bone marrow mastocytosis (BMM), 67 indolent SM (ISM), 10 aggressive SM (ASM)- and 83 age-matched healthy donors (HD), using spectral flow cytometry and the EuroFlow Immunomonitoring panel, and correlated it with multilineage KITD816V, the alpha-tryptasemia genotype (HαT) and the clinical manifestations of the disease. RESULTS: SM patients showed decreased counts (vs. HD) of TCD4- cytotoxic cells, NK cells and several functional subsets of TCD4+ cells (total Th1, Th2-effector memory, Th22-terminal effector and Th1-like Tregs), together with increased T-follicular-helper and Th1/Th17-like Treg counts, associated with different immune profiles per diagnostic subtype of SM, in multilineal versus MC-restricted KITD816V and in cases with a HαT+ versus HαT- genotype. Unique immune profiles were found among BMM and ISM patients with MC-restricted KITD816V who displayed HαT, anaphylaxis, hymenoptera venom allergy, bone disease, pruritus, flushing and GI symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our results reveal altered T- and NK-cell immune profiles in blood of SM, which vary per disease subtype, the pattern of involvement of haematopoiesis by KITD816V, the HαT genotype and specific clinical manifestations of the disease.

Histological characterization of liver involvement in systemic mastocytosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is characterized by the accumulation of atypical mast cells (MCs) in organs. Liver histology of SM has been marginally described and accurate histological classification is critical, given the consequences of aggressive SM diagnosis. We aimed to describe the histological features associated with liver SM using updated tools. METHODS: Using the database of the French Reference Centre for Mastocytosis, we retrospectively identified patients with a liver biopsy (LB) and a diagnosis of SM. All LB procedures were performed according to the local physician in charge and centrally reviewed by an expert pathologist. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included: 6 had indolent SM, 9 had aggressive SM, and 13 had SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm. Twenty-five (89%) patients presented hepatomegaly, and 19 (68%) had portal hypertension. The LB frequently showed slight sinusoid dilatation (82%). Fibrosis was observed in 3/6 indolent SM and in almost all advanced SM cases (21/22), but none of them showed cirrhosis. A high MC burden (>50 MCs/high-power field) was correlated with elevated blood alkaline phosphatase levels (p = .030). The presence of portal hypertension was associated with a higher mean fibrosis grade (1.6 vs. 0.8 in its absence; p = .026). In advanced SM, the presence of nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) was associated with decreased overall survival (9.5 vs. 46.3 months, p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: MC infiltration induced polymorphic hepatic lesions and the degree of fibrosis is associated with portal hypertension. NRH identifies a poor prognosis subgroup of patients with advanced SM. Assessing liver histology can aid in SM prognostic evaluation.

Unraveling wasp sensitization in a patient with systemic mastocytosis by CAP-inhibition assay.

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a clonal mast cell disorder that can lead to potentially severe anaphylactic reactions. Hymenoptera sting is one of the most frequent triggers of anaphylaxis in these patients, and diagnosis of indolent SM (ISM) without skin involvement (ISMs) is not rare. In this subgroup of patients, venom immunotherapy (VIT) is an effective treatment decreasing subsequent systemic reactions, and lifelong administration is recommended. An individualized diagnosis is necessary to offer the most adequate VIT, and molecular diagnosis (MD) may be useful to discriminate between primary sensitization and cross-reactivity. Nevertheless, other techniques such as ImmunoCAP inhibition assays may be necessary to identify the genuine sensitization to offer the most suitable VIT. We present a male patient with an anaphylactic reaction following several wasp stings. The patient was diagnosed with ISM, and allergy to both Polistes dominula and Vespula sp venom was confirmed. In this scenario, MD did not discriminate between a genuine double sensitization and venom cross-reactivity between both vespids. Thus, CAP-inhibition assay was performed. This case indicated the importance of an accurate diagnosis of hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA). It also highlights the usefulness of CAP-inhibition assays when MD fails to distinguish between genuine double Polistes-Vespula sensitization and cross-reactivity.

Proteomic and transcriptomic screening demonstrates increased mast cell-derived CCL23 in systemic mastocytosis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a heterogeneous group of mast cell-driven diseases diagnosed by bone marrow sampling. However, there are a limited number of available blood disease biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to identify mast cell-derived proteins that could potentially serve as blood biomarkers for indolent and advanced forms of SM. METHODS: We performed a plasma proteomics screening coupled with single-cell transcriptomic analysis in SM patients and healthy subjects. RESULTS: Plasma proteomics screening identified 19 proteins upregulated in indolent disease compared to healthy, and 16 proteins in advanced disease compared to indolent. Among these, 5 proteins, CCL19, CCL23, CXCL13, IL-10, and IL-12Rß1, were higher in indolent relative to healthy and in advanced disease compared to indolent. Single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrated that CCL23, IL-10, and IL-6 were selectively produced by mast cells. Notably, plasma CCL23 levels correlated positively with known markers of SM disease severity, namely tryptase levels, percentage bone marrow mast cell infiltration, and IL-6. CONCLUSION: CCL23 is produced predominantly by mast cells in SM, and CCL23 plasma levels are associated with disease severity, correlating positively with established markers of disease burden, thus suggesting that CCL23 is a specific SM biomarker. In addition, the combination of CCL19, CCL23, CXCL13, IL-10, and IL-12Rß1 may be useful for defining disease stage.

What Is the Value of Counting Mast Cells in Gastrointestinal Mucosal Biopsies?

Neoplastic and nonneoplastic mast cell disorders can cause diarrhea, nausea, and abdominal pain that result from heightened release of mast cell mediators. Systemic mastocytosis is characterized by neoplastic mast cell aggregates in the bone marrow and other sites, particularly the skin and gastrointestinal tract. In this situation, extramedullary mast cell aggregates display atypical morphology, with aberrant immunostaining for CD25 in addition to staining for other mast cell markers, such as mast cell tryptase and CD117. Morphologically normal mast cells have also been implicated in nonneoplastic conditions. For example, increased mast cell numbers have been reported in the mucosal biopsy samples from patients with irritable bowel syndrome and hereditary alpha-tryptasemia. Patients with mast cell activation syndrome presumably experience symptoms related to the aberrant elaboration of histamine and other mediators from normal-appearing mast cells present in normal numbers. Unfortunately, similarities in terminology among these biologically distinct clinical conditions have caused considerable diagnostic confusion among clinical colleagues, resulting in frequent requests for pathologists to quantify and characterize mast cells in normal gastrointestinal biopsy samples from patients with diarrheal symptoms. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available data related to mast cell assessment in the gastrointestinal tract and provide pathologists with practical information so that they can help their clinical colleagues manage patients with presumed mast cell disorders.

Mast cell evaluation in gastrointestinal biopsies: should we be counting? A critical review and practical guide for the surgical pathologist.

Mast cells are residents of the tubular gastrointestinal (GI) tract, where they play an important role in host defence and other vital functions. Dysregulation of mast cells has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several neoplastic, inflammatory, and functional disorders, some of which may manifest with GI symptoms. Surgical pathologists must therefore confront when and how to evaluate GI biopsies for mast cells, and whether such decisions should be based on morphologic criteria, clinical context, or direct request from clinical colleagues. The pathologist's role in evaluation of mast cell infiltrates is best defined in the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis, where the utility of morphologic assessment coupled with ancillary studies is well established. In contrast, in nonneoplastic mast cell disorders such as mast cell activation syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, or so-called 'mastocytic enterocolitis', a role for histopathology, if any, is controversial. Despite this, pathologists have seen a sharp increase in requests for mast cell quantification in the latter setting, despite these requests not being supported by published evidence. Moreover, what constitutes a 'normal' number of mast cells in a luminal GI biopsy is not well established. As a result, there is considerable variation in how these requests are handled in practice. This review evaluates and summarizes the published evidence relating to mast cell evaluation in endoscopic GI biopsies in various clinical scenarios, with a goal of providing practical, evidence-based guidance for the surgical pathologist when approached with requests for mast cell quantification in GI biopsies.

Capitalizing on paradoxical activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway for treatment of Imatinib-resistant mast cell leukemia.

Prevention of fatal side effects during cancer therapy of cancer patients with high-dosed pharmacological inhibitors is to date a major challenge. Moreover, the development of drug resistance poses severe problems for the treatment of patients with leukemia or solid tumors. Particularly drug-mediated dimerization of RAF kinases can be the cause of acquired resistance, also called "paradoxical activation." In the present work we re-analyzed the effects of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on the proliferation, metabolic activity, and survival of the Imatinib-resistant, KIT V560G, D816V-expressing human mast cell (MC) leukemia (MCL) cell line HMC-1.2. We observed that low concentrations of the TKIs Nilotinib and Ponatinib resulted in enhanced proliferation, suggesting paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway. Indeed, these TKIs caused BRAF-CRAF dimerization, resulting in ERK1/2 activation. The combination of Ponatinib with the MEK inhibitor Trametinib, at nanomolar concentrations, effectively suppressed HMC-1.2 proliferation, metabolic activity, and induced apoptotic cell death. Effectiveness of this drug combination was recapitulated in the human KIT D816V MC line ROSAKIT D816V and in KIT D816V hematopoietic progenitors obtained from patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) and systemic mastocytosis patient samples. In conclusion, mutated KIT-driven Imatinib resistance and possible TKI-induced paradoxical activation can be efficiently overcome by a low concentration Ponatinib and Trametinib co-treatment, potentially reducing the negative side effects associated with MCL therapy.

Response and resistance to cladribine in patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis: a registry-based analysis.

We sought to evaluate the efficacy of the purine analogue cladribine in 79 patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) using data from the 'German Registry on Disorders of Eosinophils and Mast Cells (GREM)'. The overall response rate according to modified Valent criteria (46 evaluable patients) for first- (1L) and second-line (2L) cladribine treatment was 41% (12/29) and 35% (6/17, P = 0.690), respectively, and the median overall survival (OS, all patients evaluable) was 1.9 years (n = 48) and 1.2 years (n = 31; P = 0.311). Univariate and multivariable analyses of baseline and on-treatment parameters identified diagnosis of mast cell leukemia (hazard ratio [HR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI, 1.3-9.1], P = 0.012), eosinophilia ≥ 1.5 × 109/L (HR 2.9 [CI 1.4-6.2], P = 0.006) and < 3 cycles of cladribine (HR 0.4 [CI 0.2-0.8], P = 0.008) as independent adverse prognostic parameters for OS. There was no impact of other laboratory (anemia, thrombocytopenia, serum tryptase) or genetic markers (mutations in SRSF2, ASXL1 or RUNX1) on OS. In consequence, none of the recently established prognostic scoring systems (MARS, IPSM, MAPS or GPSM) was predictive for OS. Modified Valent criteria were superior to a single factor-based response assessment (HR 2.9 [CI 1.3-6.6], P = 0.026). In conclusion, cladribine is effective in 1L and 2L treatment of AdvSM. Mast cell leukemia, eosinophilia, application of < 3 cycles and a lack of response are adverse prognostic markers.

Systemic mastocytosis: 2023 update on diagnosis and management in adults.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a complex and heterogeneous disease, characterized by the clonal accumulation of mast cells in one or more organs. In 2022 both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) modified the diagnostic and classification criteria of SM. Moreover, the identification of new clinical and molecular variables has improved prognostic tools and led to increasingly individualized therapeutic strategies. AREAS COVERED: The aim of this review is to present the updates introduced by the International Consensus Classification in diagnostic criteria of SM. In addition, we report the latest data available from the most important clinical trials in patients both with non-advanced and advanced disease, including elenestinib and bezuclastinib. EXPERT OPINION: Diagnosis and classification of SM has evolved over years. The most recent WHO and ICC classification improved SM diagnostic work-up, providing clinicians with a clear and simplified diagnostic scheme. New approved targeted therapies such as midostaurin and avapritinib modified the treatment paradigm in patients in advanced stage, and next-generation inhibitors actually investigated in clinical trials are expected in the next future.

Kidney and urinary tract involvement in systemic mastocytosis.

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a disorder of excessive mast cell accumulation in tissues due to a somatic gain-of-function mutation, commonly in the KIT gene, which prevents apoptosis of mast cells. Whereas bone marrow, skin, lymph nodes, spleen and gastrointestinal tract are commonly involved, kidneys are rarely involved directly by SM. However, there are increasing reports of indirect kidney involvement in patients with SM. Novel anti-neoplastic agents to treat advanced forms of SM include non-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which are reported to be associated with kidney dysfunction in some patients. SM is also associated with immune-mediated glomerulonephritis (GN) such as mesangioproliferative GN, membranous nephropathy and diffuse proliferative GN. Kidney injury, in the form of monoclonal deposition disease and primary light chain amyloidosis, is reported in SM associated with plasma cell dyscrasia. In this narrative review we discuss the various ways kidneys (and the urinary tract) are involved in patients with SM.

Cluster-Analytic Identification of Clinically Meaningful Subtypes in MCAS: The Relevance of Heat and Cold.

BACKGROUND: Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a clinically heterogeneous disease with allergy-like symptoms and abdominal complaints. Its etiology is only partially understood and it is often overlooked. AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify subgroups of MCAS patients to facilitate diagnosis and allow a personalized therapy. METHODS: Based on data from 250 MCAS patients, hierarchical and two-step cluster analyses as well as association analyses were performed. The data used included data from a MCAS checklist asking about symptoms and triggers and a set of diagnostically relevant laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Using a two-step cluster analysis, MCAS patients could be divided into three clusters. Physical trigger factors were particularly decisive for the classification as they showed remarkable differences between the three clusters. Cluster 1, labeled high responders, showed high values for the triggers heat and cold, whereas cluster 2, labeled intermediate responders, presented with high values for the trigger heat and low values for cold. The third cluster, labeled low responders, did not react to thermal triggers. The first two clusters showed more divers clinical symptoms especially with regard to dermatological and cardiological complaints. Subsequent association analyses revealed relationships between triggers and clinical complaints: Abdominal discomfort is mainly triggered by histamine consumption, dermatological discomfort by exercise, and neurological symptoms are related to physical exertion and periods of starvation. The reasons for the occurrence of cardiological complaints are manifold and triggers for respiratory complaints still need better identification. CONCLUSION: Our study identified three distinct clusters on the basis of physical triggers, which also differ significantly in their clinical symptoms. A trigger-related classification can be helpful in clinical practice for diagnosis and therapy. Longitudinal studies should be conducted to further understand the relationship between triggers and symptoms.

Diagnosis and management of systemic mastocytosis in a community hematology setting.

BACKGROUND: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare and potentially severe hematologic disorder characterized by the clonal proliferation of mast cells (MCs) into various organs. The clinical manifestations of advanced SM are caused by the uncontrolled release of cytokines and vasoactive amines from MC and disease-induced organ dysfunction. Patients with SM typically present with symptoms such as flushing, pruritus, diarrhea, and headaches, but outcomes following active treatment have not been well characterized. In this study, the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and natural history of an SM patient cohort diagnosed and treated within a community hematology network in the United States is described. METHODS: We identified 105 patients who were diagnosed and managed in one of 19 community hematology clinics up to an index date of 1 October 2022. Data collection included patient and disease characteristics, baseline biochemistry and hematology, SM diagnostic criteria being met, biomarkers tested, CD2 and/or CD25 expression in MCs as well as serum tryptase levels at presentation. Data abstraction also included supportive care drugs and anticancer therapy used, treatment response, reason for discontinuation, and overall survival by disease subtype. RESULTS: A total of 105 SM patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria. The specific SM subtypes were indolent (47.6%), aggressive (9.5%), SM with an associated hematological neoplasm (19.0%), MC leukemia (1.9%), and subtype not documented (21.9%). Regardless of subtype, approximately 62% of patients did not receive SM-directed active therapy. Only 26% of patients with indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) received treatment compared to 65.6% with advanced subtypes. Relative to ISM cohort, the relative risk of death in patients with the advanced SM subtypes was approximately 15 times greater (hazard ratio = 15.0; 95% confidence interval: 3.3 to 66.5). CONCLUSIONS: SM patients present with multiple underlying symptoms, within various disease subtypes that are difficult to diagnose in a timely manner. As a result, many patients do not receive active drug therapy for their disease. Therefore, greater disease awareness is required as well as new tools for earlier disease detection.

Advances in mast cell biology.

Mast cells (MCs) contribute prominently to all allergic diseases, yet are still poorly understood owing to their exclusive residence in tissues. Recently, the use of RNA-sequencing, proteomics, and other technological advances have accelerated the acquisition of new knowledge. This includes an expanded definition of MC heterogeneity and developmental origins, previously unrecognized functions for MCs, discoveries of genetic causes of MC-related disorders, the introduction of new therapies for clonal MC disease, and the identification of new potential target for treatments. This issue of Advances addresses key studies from 2020 to 2021.

KIT D816V Mast Cells Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Recapitulate Systemic Mastocytosis Transcriptional Profile.

Mast cells (MCs) represent a population of hematopoietic cells with a key role in innate and adaptive immunity and are well known for their detrimental role in allergic responses. Yet, MCs occur in low abundance, which hampers their detailed molecular analysis. Here, we capitalized on the potential of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells to give rise to all cells in the body and established a novel and robust protocol for human iPS cell differentiation toward MCs. Relying on a panel of systemic mastocytosis (SM) patient-specific iPS cell lines carrying the KIT D816V mutation, we generated functional MCs that recapitulate SM disease features: increased number of MCs, abnormal maturation kinetics and activated phenotype, CD25 and CD30 surface expression and a transcriptional signature characterized by upregulated expression of innate and inflammatory response genes. Therefore, human iPS cell-derived MCs are a reliable, inexhaustible, and close-to-human tool for disease modeling and pharmacological screening to explore novel MC therapeutics.

Perioperative management of mastocytosis.

PURPOSE: Patients with mastocytosis have an increased risk of anaphylaxis during surgical procedures with general anesthesia. Therefore, we reviewed the anesthesia course of a large cohort of patients with mastocytosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed adult and pediatric patients with mastocytosis who underwent surgical procedures with general anesthesia at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 2000, through June 30, 2021. We also included any procedures with general anesthesia that occurred during the 3-year period preceding mastocytosis diagnosis and designated the patients who underwent these procedures as having an unknown diagnosis at the time of their surgical procedure. We analyzed whether patients received chronic antimediator treatment for mastocytosis and/or prophylactic medications before the procedures. We also determined whether medications indicative of mastocytosis-related adverse events were intraoperatively administered. RESULTS: We identified 113 patients who underwent 219 procedures during the study period; 25 procedures were performed before mastocytosis diagnosis. Of 194 procedures in patients with known mastocytosis, patients received chronic antimediator therapy and/or perioperative prophylactic medications for 178 (91.8%) procedures. Among these procedures, 10 were potentially complicated by mast cell activation, which was inferred from administration of inhaled albuterol (n = 3) or intravenous diphenhydramine (n = 8). In addition, there was only one case of intraoperative anaphylaxis which occurred in a patient who underwent anesthesia before mastocytosis diagnosis and therefore did not receive prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative anaphylaxis can be the first presenting sign of mastocytosis. Patients with mastocytosis who received chronic antimediator therapy and/or preoperative prophylactic medications had an uneventful surgical course.

Patient-reported outcomes among patients with systemic mastocytosis in routine clinical practice: Results of the TouchStone SM Patient Survey.

BACKGROUND: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare clonal neoplasm driven by KIT D816V and other mutations. Data were collected from the patient perspective on disease burden and included an SM-specific symptom assessment tool. METHODS: US adults aged 18 years and older with a self-reported SM diagnosis completed an online TouchStone SM Patient Survey of 100 items, including the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey, the Indolent Systemic Mastocytosis Symptom Assessment Form, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, as well as questions about SM diagnosis, the impact of SM on daily activities, work impairment, and health care use. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Fifty-six individuals completed the survey (89% women; median age, 48 years; mean time since diagnosis, 6.7 years), reporting indolent SM (66%), aggressive SM (9%), smoldering SM (5%), and unknown SM subtype (18%). Over a 1-year recall, respondents reported seeking emergency care for anaphylaxis (30%) and taking three or more prescription medications (52%) for SM. Over one half of patients (54%) reduced their work hours because of SM, and 64% avoided leaving home because of symptoms. A majority of respondents (93%) had experienced ≥10 SM-related symptoms, noting that the most bothersome were anaphylactic episodes (18%), abdominal/stomach pain (16%), diarrhea/loose stools (13%), and fatigue (11%). Whereas an Indolent Systemic Mastocytosis Symptom Assessment Form-derived total symptom score of 28 is used to indicate moderate-to-severe symptoms, the mean total symptom score was 52.7. Mental and physical component summary scores from the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey were below population norms. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were surveyed reported substantial symptom burden and unmet needs because of SM, as evidenced by seeking emergency care and reporting bothersome symptoms, poor quality of life, and reduced work hours and productivity. LAY SUMMARY: The objective of this research was to understand the burden and unmet needs in the rare disease of systemic mastocytosis (SM) to guide future care. Fifty-six patients completed an online survey containing questions about their diagnosis, medications, health care use, quality of life, and SM symptoms. The results demonstrated that SM is associated with severe and burdensome symptoms, anaphylactic events, emergency department visits, use of multiple medications, reduced ability to work, and poor physical and psychological quality of life. These findings suggest the need for future advances to address unmet needs in patients affected by SM.

Perceptions of patient disease burden and management approaches in systemic mastocytosis: Results of the TouchStone Healthcare Provider Survey.

BACKGROUND: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare clonal neoplasm driven by the KIT D816V mutation and has a broad range of debilitating symptoms. In this study, the authors evaluated SM disease perceptions and management strategies among US health care providers (HCPs). METHODS: Hematologist/oncologist (H/O) HCPs and allergist/immunologist (A/I) HCPs who were treating four or more patients with SM completed an online, 51-item TouchStone HCP Survey, which queried provider characteristics, perceptions of disease burden, and current management. Descriptive analyses by specialty and SM subtype were performed. RESULTS: Of 304 HCPs contacted, 111 (37%) met eligibility criteria, including 51% A/I specialists and 49% H/O specialists. On average, the HCPs had 14 years of practice experience and cared for 20 patients with SM. A/I HCPs saw more patients with nonadvanced SM (78%) compared with H/O HCPs, who saw similar proportions of patients with nonadvanced SM (54%) and advanced SM (46%). HCPs reported testing 75% of patients for the KIT D816V mutation and found an estimated prevalence of 47%. On average, HCPs estimated 8 months between symptom onset and SM diagnosis. HCPs reported that 62% of patients with indolent SM felt depressed or discouraged because of symptoms. In terms of treatment goals for SM, both types of specialists prioritized symptom improvement for nonadvanced SM and improved survival for advanced SM while also prioritizing improving patient quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Both A/I and H/O specialists highlighted unmet needs for patients with SM. The HCPs surveyed reported a lower rate of KIT D816V mutations and a perceived shorter time between symptom onset and SM diagnosis compared with published estimates. LAY SUMMARY: Specialists treating systemic mastocytosis (SM) completed a 51-item questionnaire about their clinical practices and perceptions of disease impact. The study included 111 hematology, oncology, allergy, and immunology physicians. Physicians reported that most patients had nonadvanced disease, yet SM symptoms significantly disrupted their patients' lives. Physicians estimated that SM is diagnosed within months of symptom onset, in contrast with published reports of years' long delays reported by patients with SM. This study identified unmet needs that can inform educational and patient management priorities in this rare disease.

Perspective: Pivotal translational hematology and therapeutic insights in chronic myeloid hematopoietic stem cell malignancies.

Despite much of the past 2 years being engulfed by the devastating consequences of the SAR-CoV-2 pandemic, significant progress, even breathtaking, occurred in the field of chronic myeloid malignancies. Some of this was show-cased at the 15th Post-American Society of Hematology (ASH) and the 25th John Goldman workshops on myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) held on 9th-10th December 2020 and 7th-10th October 2021, respectively. The inaugural Post-ASH MPN workshop was set out in 2006 by John Goldman (deceased) and Tariq Mughal to answer emerging translational hematology and therapeutics of patients with these malignancies. Rather than present a resume of the discussions, this perspective focuses on some of the pivotal translational hematology and therapeutic insights in these diseases.

Therapeutic management and outcome of patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis treated with midostaurin: A comprehensive real-life study in the French national healthcare database.

Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis (Adv-SM) is rare and has a poor prognosis. Midostaurin (Rydapt® ) is one of the few treatments for Adv-SM in Europe. The study aims were to describe the characteristics of patients treated with midostaurin, their treatment modalities, outcomes, and serious events requiring hospitalization. This retrospective observational study was conducted using the French National Healthcare Database (SNDS) and included adult Adv-SM patients treated with midostaurin between 01-01-2012 and 09-30-2018. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess survival and treatment duration. Eighty-one patients were included: 37 with Aggressive Systemic Mastocytosis (SM) (46%), 31 with SM with an Associated Hematological Neoplasm (38%), and 4 with Mast Cell Leukemia (5%). The SM subtype was undetermined in 9 patients (11%). The median age was 67 years; 64% of patients were male. Over the mean follow-up of 11.4 months, median midostaurin treatment duration was 8.4 months and 28 patients (35%) were still under treatment at the end of the study. One-year and 5-year overall survival rates estimated since the time of diagnosis were 83% and 56%, respectively. Twelve serious events (among those frequently reported during clinical trials and compassionate use) requiring hospitalization were identified; a causal association with Adv-SM treatment could neither be excluded nor established. In this first real-life study on patients treated with midostaurin for Adv-SM, the patients' characteristics, their management, treatment discontinuation, and survival were in line with previous results (compassionate use and clinical trials).