Promoting pedestrian safety in Bangladesh: Identifying factors for drivers' yielding behavior at designated crossings using behavior change theories.

OBJECTIVE: In Bangladesh, drivers' failure to yield to pedestrians at designated crossings poses a significant safety risk and discourages their use of such crossings. The use of behavior change theories could be more appropriate in such complex situations where the interdependent behaviors of drivers and pedestrians interact. While many studies have identified factors that affect drivers' yielding behavior in the literature, fewer efforts have been made to apply behavior change theories in exploring and validating these factors, and to reach a consensus among competing road users. This study is among the first to utilize behavior change theories in Bangladesh to identify pedestrians' safety factors that could promote drivers' yielding behavior, upon which a consensus between drivers and pedestrians could be established. METHODS: A self-reported attitudinal survey was administered to 202 drivers on two highways in Bangladesh with a questionnaire using the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior (COM-B) model for the comprehensive coverage of behavior change theories. The focus group interviews were also conducted with 40 pedestrians and 19 drivers who have experience with four crossing sites on the selected highways. The collected data were analyzed using a regression model to identify significant factors influencing the drivers' yielding behavior. These factors were then justified using a deductive thematic coding framework based on behavior change theories. RESULTS: The regression model explained the variance in drivers' yielding by 45.1% with eight factors. The model found seven positive significant contributory factors in the drivers' yielding that could promote pedestrian safety. Of them, the motivation factors were avoiding random crossing by pedestrians, vulnerable groups, assertiveness, and facial fear expressions; and the opportunity factors were traffic signs or advanced yield lines, crossing in groups at specific times, and enforcement. CONCLUSIONS: The study's findings have practical implications for policymakers, highway designers, and other stakeholders involved in promoting pedestrian safety by acknowledging their stake in making any decision that might impact them. Highway designers can use the thematic coding framework to recommend any contributory factors involved, where competing drivers' unwillingness to yield is the primary threat to pedestrians' safety.

A Qualitative Investigation on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Neurodivergent Communities.

Vaccine hesitancy is a major barrier to vaccination, hindering the success of vaccine efforts and thereby increasing public health risk to viral diseases, including COVID-19. Neurodivergent (ND) individuals, including individuals with an intellectual and/or developmental disability, have demonstrated a heightened risk of hospitalization and death due to COVID-19, highlighting the need for further research specifically on ND communities. We conducted a qualitative analysis using in-depth interviews with medical professionals, non-medical health professionals and communicators, and ND individuals or their caregivers. Using a thematic coding analysis methodology, trained coders identified major themes according to 24 distinct codes spanning across the categories of (1) barriers to vaccination; (2) facilitators to vaccination; and (3) suggestions for improving vaccine confidence. Qualitative findings identify misinformation, perception of vaccine risk, sensory sensitivities, and structural hardship as the most significant barriers to COVID-19 vaccination. We highlight the importance of accommodations to vaccination for the ND community alongside coordinated efforts by healthcare leaders to direct their communities to accurate sources of medical information. This work will inform the direction of future research on vaccine hesitancy, and the development of programs specific to the ND community's access to vaccines.

Do gender differences exist in letters of recommendation for reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship?

OBJECTIVE(S): To determine if gender differences exist in letters of recommendation (LORs) for reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: A cohort of applicants to a reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship program at a single Midwestern academic institution in a single year. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative measures included linguistics inquiry and word count analysis, with 4 summary variables and 25 word categories, to quantify tone and themes present by gender. Performing qualitative analysis in parallel to linguistic analysis allowed for the exploration of themes not conveyed in quantitative methods alone. Qualitative measures included the frequency of code themes in LOR by applicant gender. RESULTS: There were 272 letters from 72 applicants, 54 (76%) of which were women and 17 (24%) were men. One applicant was excluded because gender information was not specified; 269 letters were included in the quantitative linguistics and qualitative coding analysis. One hundred 10 letters (41%) were written by women and 159 (59%) by men. LOR written for men had a higher mean word count than those written for women (537 vs. 474, P=.04). Linguistics Inquiry and Word Count analysis exhibited more risk words used to describe men applicants (P=.01). When comparing word categories by letter writer gender, women letter writers more frequently used communal, affect, and home word categories whereas men writers more frequently used affiliation-related words. Qualitative analysis revealed that letters for men applicants described leadership, altruism, rapport with patients, and strong endorsements more frequently, whereas women applicants' letters more often mentioned doubt raisers and disclosures of personal life. In addition, letters for women applicants more often described candidates as drama free, not easy to "fluster," and not complainers. Furthermore, letters for women more frequently disclosed parenthood status. CONCLUSIONS: Gender differences exist among both letter writers and applicants. Qualitative analysis revealed that women applicants were more likely to be described with doubt raisers and personal life disclosures, whereas men were more likely to be described by their altruism and with a strong endorsement. Increasing bias awareness and implementing mitigation strategies would improve gender equity in LOR.

Potential of podcasting and blogging in cultivating Iranian advanced EFL learners' reading comprehension.

This study explores the potential of podcasting and blogging in cultivating advanced EFL learners' reading comprehension (RC) gains, as well as their perceptions of their effectiveness in improving their RC gains. For this purpose, three intact female classes (n = 20) were selected using a convenience sampling method from Pooyesh Language Center in Borujerd City, Iran. Then, they were randomly assigned into three groups, including the podcasting group, blogging group, and control group. Afterward, they went through a pre-test, an intervention (12 one-hour sessions held twice a week), and a post-test. For disclosing their perceptions, 10 students of the experimental groups were requested to fill out a reflective written statement about the potential of podcasting and blogging in improving their RC gains. A one-way ANOVA and a thematic coding analysis were used to analyze the collected data. Findings revealed that the podcasting and blogging groups outweighed the control group at the end of the treatments. Additionally, the results evidenced that there was no statistically significant difference between the podcasting and blogging groups. The qualitative findings disclosed that the participants had positive perceptions toward using podcasting and blogging in developing RC. Finally, the implications for L2 teachers and L2 learners are discussed.

Older Adults' Perceptions toward Walking: A Qualitative Study Using a Social-Ecological Model.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to investigate older adults' perceptions of their walking experiences, using the social-ecological model as a guiding framework and to propose future walking intervention content. METHODS: Thirty-eight participants (19 women; 47% from private elderly centers; mean age = 72.8 (SD = 7.4 years) took part in semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data analysis software QSR-NVivo was used for thematic coding. RESULTS: Thematic deductive analysis revealed pertinent themes at the individual level (health benefits and barriers, fall risk, perseverance, and walking as a suitable activity for older adults), social environment level (social support and social interaction), physical environment level (density, land-use mix, and connectivity; perceived safety, pedestrian facilities (benches, quality of walking paths and sidewalks, and aesthetics), other pedestrian behaviors, and weather, and policy level (lack of walking programs in the community, and supportive culture for an active lifestyle). DISCUSSION: Our findings provide insights for the planning of future multilevel walking intervention programs for older adults in Hong Kong. It is suggested that future walking intervention should include professionals (e.g., physiotherapist or coach) in a group setting, practical walking recommendations such as proper walking posture, and additional fun activities for older adults.

The manifestations of politics in evaluation: An exploratory study across the evaluation process.

Evaluation has been described as a political act. Programs and policies are generated from a political process, and the decision to evaluate and how to use the evaluation are manifestations of the political dynamic. This exploratory study was conducted with practicing evaluators to understand what they view as political situations in the evaluation process and how they responded to these situations. Findings suggest that, in relation to the potential evaluation phases in which each respondent has been involved, evaluations are susceptible to politics when initially attempting to identify stakeholders and when it's time to report the evaluation findings. Evaluators have also developed multiple strategies for dealing with these situations, including finding allies for the evaluation and working to explain the evaluation process and its implications. We hope that this study will help to inform novice and expert evaluators about the various political situations they may encounter in their practice.