Validation of an in vivo transit dosimetry algorithm using Monte Carlo simulations and ionization chamber measurements.

PURPOSE: Transit dosimetry is a safety tool based on the transit images acquired during treatment. Forward-projection transit dosimetry software, as PerFRACTION, compares the transit images acquired with an expected image calculated from the DICOM plan, the CT, and the structure set. This work aims to validate PerFRACTION expected transit dose using PRIMO Monte Carlo simulations and ionization chamber measurements, and propose a methodology based on MPPG5a report. METHODS: The validation process was divided into three groups of tests according to MPPG5a: basic dose validation, IMRT dose validation, and heterogeneity correction validation. For the basic dose validation, the fields used were the nine fields needed to calibrate PerFRACTION and three jaws-defined. For the IMRT dose validation, seven sweeping gaps fields, the MLC transmission and 29 IMRT fields from 10 breast treatment plans were measured. For the heterogeneity validation, the transit dose of these fields was studied using three phantoms: 10 , 30 , and a 3 cm cork slab placed between 10 cm of solid water. The PerFRACTION expected doses were compared with PRIMO Monte Carlo simulation results and ionization chamber measurements. RESULTS: Using the 10 cm solid water phantom, for the basic validation fields, the root mean square (RMS) of the difference between PerFRACTION and PRIMO simulations was 0.6%. In the IMRT fields, the RMS of the difference was 1.2%. When comparing respect ionization chamber measurements, the RMS of the difference was 1.0% both for the basic and the IMRT validation. The average passing rate with a γ(2%/2 mm, TH = 20%) criterion between PRIMO dose distribution and PerFRACTION expected dose was 96.0% ± 5.8%. CONCLUSION: We validated PerFRACTION calculated transit dose with PRIMO Monte Carlo and ionization chamber measurements adapting the methodology of the MMPG5a report. The methodology presented can be applied to validate other forward-projection transit dosimetry software.

Gamma passing rates of daily EPID transit images correlate to PTV coverage for breast cancer IMRT treatment plans.

PURPOSE: The use of the transit image obtained with the electronic portal-imaging device (EPID) is becoming an extended method to perform in-vivo dosimetry. The transit images acquired during each fraction can be compared with a predicted image, if available, or with a baseline image, usually the obtained in the first fraction. This work aims to study the dosimetric impact of the failing fractions and to evaluate the appropriateness of using a baseline image in breast plans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty breast patients treated in a Halcyon were retrospectively selected. For each patient and fraction, the treatment plan was calculated over the daily CBCT image. For each fraction, the differences respect to the treatment plan values of OARs and PTV dosimetric parameters were analyzed: ΔDmean , ΔD95%, ΔD98%, ΔD2%, ΔV36Gy, ΔV38.5Gy, and ΔV43.5Gy. Daily fractions were ranked according to the differences found in the dosimetric parameters between the treatment plan and the daily CBCT to establish the best fraction. The daily transit images acquired in every fraction were compared to the first fraction using the global gamma index with the Portal Dosimetry tool. The comparison was repeated using the best fraction image as a baseline. We assessed the correlation of the dosimetric differences obtained from the CBCT images-based treatment plans with the gamma index passing rates obtained using first fraction and best fraction as baseline. RESULTS: Average values of -11.6% [-21.4%, -3.3%] and -3.2% [-1.0%, -10.3%] for the ∆PTVD98% and ∆PTVD95% per every 10% decrease in the passing rate were found, respectively. When using the best fraction as baseline patients were detected with failing fractions that were not detected with the first fraction as baseline. CONCLUSION: The gamma passing rates of daily transit images correlate with the coverage loss parameters in breast IMRT plans. Using first fraction image as baseline can lead to the non-detectability of failing fractions.

The fast calibration model for dosimetry with an electronic portal imaging device.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop an algorithm that corrects the image of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) of a linear accelerator so that it can be used for dosimetric purposes, such as in vivo dosimetry or quality assurance for photon radiotherapy. For that purpose, the impact of the field size, phantom thickness, and the varying spectral photon distribution within the irradiation field on the EPID image was investigated. METHODS: The EPID measurements were verified using reference measurements with ionization chambers. Therefore, absolute dose measurements with an ionization chamber and relative dose measurements with a detector array were performed. An EPID calibration and correction algorithm was developed to convert the EPID image to a dose distribution. The algorithm was validated by irradiating inhomogeneous phantoms using square fields as well as irregular IMRT fields. RESULTS: It was possible to correct the influence of the field size, phantom thickness on the EPID signal as well as the homogenization of the image profile by several correction factors within 0.6%. A gamma index analysis (3%, 3 mm) of IMRT fields showed a pass rate of above 99%, when comparing to the planning system. CONCLUSION: The developed algorithm enables an online dose measurement with the EPID during the radiation treatment. The algorithm is characterized by a robust, non-iterative, and thus real-time capable procedure with little measuring effort and does not depend on system-specific parameters. The EPID image is corrected by multiplying three independent correction factors. Therefore, it can easily be extent by further correction factors for other influencing variables, so it can be transferred to other linear accelerators and EPID configurations.

Portal dosimetry in radiotherapy repeatability evaluation.

The accuracy of radiotherapy is the subject of continuous discussion, and dosimetry methods, particularly in dynamic techniques, are being developed. At the same time, many oncology centers develop quality procedures, including pretreatment and online dose verification and proper patient tracking methods. This work aims to present the possibility of using portal dosimetry in the assessment of radiotherapy repeatability. The analysis was conducted on 74 cases treated with dynamic techniques. Transit dosimetry was made for each collision-free radiation beam. It allowed the comparison of summary fluence maps, obtained for fractions with the corresponding summary maps from all other treatment fractions. For evaluation of the compatibility in the fluence map pairs (6798), the gamma coefficient was calculated. The results were considered in four groups, depending on the used radiotherapy technique: stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy, breath-hold, free-breathing, and conventionally fractionated other cases. The chi2 or Fisher's exact test was made depending on the size of the analyzed set and also Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare treatment repeatability of different techniques. The aim was to test whether the null hypothesis of error-free therapy was met. The patient is treated repeatedly if the P-value in all the fluence maps sets is higher than the level of 0.01. The best compatibility between treatment fractions was obtained for the stereotactic technique. The technique with breath-holding gave the lowest percentage of compliance of the analyzed fluence pairs. The results indicate that the repeatability of the treatment is associated with the radiotherapy technique. Treated volume location is also an essential factor found in the evaluation of treatment accuracy. The EPID device is a useful tool in assessing the repeatability of radiotherapy. The proposed method of fluence maps comparison also allows us to assess in which therapeutic session the patient was treated differently from the other fractions.

A novel approach to SBRT patient quality assurance using EPID-based real-time transit dosimetry : A step to QA with in vivo EPID dosimetry.

PURPOSE: Intra- and inter-fraction organ motion is a major concern in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). It may cause substantial differences between the planned and delivered dose distribution. Such delivery errors may lead to medical harm and reduce life expectancy for patients. The project presented here investigates and improves a rapid method to detect such errors by performing online dose verification through the analysis of electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images. METHODS: To validate the method, a respiratory phantom with inhomogeneous insert was examined under various scenarios: no-error and error-simulated measurements. Simulation of respiratory motions was practiced for target ranges up to 2 cm. Three types of treatment planning technique - 3DCRT (three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy), IMRT (intensity modulated radiation therapy), and VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy - were generated for lung SBRT. A total of 54 plans were generated to assess the influence of techniques on the performance of portal dose images. Subsequently, EPID images of 52 SBRT patients were verified. Both for phantom and patient cases, dose distributions were compared using the gamma index method according to analysis protocols in the target volume. RESULTS: The comparison of error-introduced EPID-measured images to reference images showed no significant differences with 3%/3 mm gamma evaluation, though target coverage was strongly underestimated. Gamma tolerance of 2%/2 mm reported noticeable detection in EPID sensitivity for simulated errors in 3DCRT and IMRT techniques. The passing rates for 3DCRT, IMRT, and VMAT with 1%/1 mm in open field were 84.86%, 92.91%, and 98.75%, and by considering MLC-CIAO + 1 cm (threshold 5%), were 68.25%, 83.19%, and 95.29%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of EPID for detecting the interplay effects. We recommend using thin computed tomography slices and adding sufficient tumor margin in order to limit the dosimetric organ motion in hypofractionated irradiation with preserved plan quality. In the presence of respiratory and gastrointestinal motion, tighter criteria and consequently using local gamma evaluation should be considered, especially for VMAT. This methodology offers a substantial step forward in in vivo dosimetry and the potential to distinguish errors depending on the gamma tolerances. Thus, the approach/prototype provides a fast and easy quality assurance procedure for treatment delivery verification.

EPID-based in vivo dosimetry using Dosimetry Check™: Overview and clinical experience in a 5-yr study including breast, lung, prostate, and head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Independent verification of the dose delivered by complex radiotherapy can be performed by electronic portal imaging device (EPID) dosimetry. This paper presents 5-yr EPID in vivo dosimetry (IVD) data obtained using the Dosimetry Check (DC) software on a large cohort including breast, lung, prostate, and head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The difference between in vivo dose measurements obtained by DC and point doses calculated by the Eclipse treatment planning system was obtained on 3795 radiotherapy patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (n = 842) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) (n = 2953) at 6, 10, and 15 MV. In cases where the dose difference exceeded ±10% further inspection and additional phantom measurements were performed. RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation ( µ ± σ ) of the percentage difference in dose obtained by DC and calculated by Eclipse in VMAT was: 0.19 ± 3.89 % in brain, 1.54 ± 4.87 % in H&N, and 1.23 ± 4.61 % in prostate cancer. In 3DCRT, this was 1.79 ± 3.51 % in brain, - 2.95 ± 5.67 % in breast, - 1.43 ± 4.38 % in bladder, 1.66 ± 4.77 % in H&N, 2.60 ± 5.35% in lung and - 3.62 ± 4.00 % in prostate cancer. A total of 153 plans exceeded the ±10% alert criteria, which included: 88 breast plans accounting for 7.9% of all breast treatments; 28 H&N plans accounting for 4.4% of all H&N treatments; and 12 prostate plans accounting for 3.5% of all prostate treatments. All deviations were found to be as a result of patient-related anatomical deviations and not from procedural errors. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary data shows that EPID-based IVD with DC may not only be useful in detecting errors but has the potential to be used to establish site-specific dose action levels. The approach is straightforward and has been implemented as a radiographer-led service with no disruption to the patient and no impact on treatment time.

Sensitivity study of an automated system for daily patient QA using EPID exit dose images.

The dosimetric consequences of errors in patient setup or beam delivery and anatomical changes are not readily known. A new product, PerFRACTION (Sun Nuclear Corporation), is designed to identify these errors by comparing the exit dose image measured on an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) from each field of each fraction to those from baseline fraction images. This work investigates the sensitivity of PerFRACTION to detect the deviation caused by these errors in a variety of realistic scenarios. Integrated EPID images were acquired in clinical mode and saved in ARIA. PerFRACTION automatically pulled the images into its database and performed the user-defined comparison. We induced errors of 1 mm and greater in jaw, multileaf collimator (MLC), and couch position, 1° and greater in collimation rotation (patient yaw), 0.5-1.5% in machine output, rail position, and setup errors of 1-2 mm shifts and 0.5-1° roll rotation. The planning techniques included static, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and VMAT fields. Rectangular solid water phantom or anthropomorphic head phantom were used in the beam path in the delivery of some fields. PerFRACTION detected position errors of the jaws, MLC, and couch with an accuracy of better than 0.4 mm, and 0.5° for collimator rotation error and detected the machine output error within 0.2%. The rail position error resulted in PerFRACTION detected dose deviations up to 8% and 3% in open field and VMAT field delivery, respectively. PerFRACTION detected induced errors in IMRT fields within 2.2% of the gamma passing rate using an independent conventional analysis. Using an anthropomorphic phantom, setup errors as small as 1 mm and 0.5° were detected. Our work demonstrates that PerFRACTION, using integrated EPID image, is sensitive enough to identify positional, angular, and dosimetric errors.

Radiotherapy planning in a prostate cancer phantom model with intraprostatic dominant lesions using stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arcs and a simultaneous integrated boost.

Aim: In the treatment of prostate cancer with radiation therapy, the addition of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL) may improve local control. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal radiation strategy in a phantom model of prostate cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT-VMAT) with a SIB of 1-4 DILs. Methods: We designed and printed a three-dimensional anthropomorphic phantom pelvis to simulate individual patient structures, including the prostate gland. A total of 36.25 Gy (SBRT) was delivered to the whole prostate. The DILs were irradiated with four different doses (40, 45, 47.5, and 50 Gy) to assess the influence of different SIB doses on dose distribution. The doses were calculated, verified, and measured using both transit and non-transit dosimetry for patient-specific quality assurance using a phantom model. Results: The dose coverage met protocol requirements for all targets. However, the dose was close to violating risk constraints to the rectum when four DILs were treated simultaneously or when the DILs were located in the posterior segments of the prostate. All verification plans passed the assumed tolerance criteria. Conclusions: Moderate dose escalation up to 45 Gy seems appropriate in cases with DILs located in posterior prostate segments or if there are three or more DILs located in other segments.

Assessing the impact of adaptations to the clinical workflow in radiotherapy using transit in vivo dosimetry.

Background and Purpose: Currently in-vivo dosimetry (IVD) is primarily used to identify individual patient errors in radiotherapy. This study investigated possible correlations of observed trends in transit IVD results, with adaptations to the clinical workflow, aiming to demonstrate the possibility of using the bulk data for continuous quality improvement. Materials and methods: In total 84,100 transit IVD measurements were analyzed of all patients treated between 2018 and 2022, divided into four yearly periods. Failed measurements (FM) were divided per pathology and into four categories of causes of failure: technical, planning and positioning problems, and anatomic changes. Results: The number of FM due to patient related problems gradually decreased from 9.5% to 6.6%, 6.1% and 5.6% over the study period. FM attributed to positioning problems decreased from 10.0% to 4.9% in boost breast cancer patients after introduction of extra imaging, from 9.1% to 3.9% in Head&Neck patients following education of radiation therapists on positioning of patients' shoulders, from 6.1% to 2.8% in breast cancer patients after introduction of ultrahypofractionated breast radiotherapy with daily online pre-treatment imaging and from 11.2% to 4.3% in extremities following introduction of immobilization with calculated couch parameters and a Surface Guided Radiation Therapy solution. FM related to anatomic changes decreased from 10.2% to 4.0% in rectum patients and from 6.7% to 3.3% in prostate patients following more patient education from dieticians. Conclusions: Our study suggests that IVD can be a powerful tool to assess the impact of adaptations to the clinical workflow and its use for continuous quality improvement.

A novel TPS toolkit to assess correlation between transit fluence dosimetry and DVH metrics for adaptive head and neck radiotherapy.

Inter-fractional anatomical variations in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients can lead to clinically significant dosimetric changes. Adaptive re-planning should thus commence to negate any potential over-dosage to organs-at-risk (OAR), as well as potential under-dosage to target lesions. The aim of this study is to explore the correlation between transit fluence, as measured at an electronic portal imaging device (EPID), and dose volume histogram (DVH) metrics to target and OAR structures in a simulated environment. Planning data of eight patients that have previously undergone adaptive radiotherapy for H&N cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) at the Royal Adelaide Hospital were selected for this study. Through delivering the original treatment plan to both the planning and rescan CTs of these eight patients, predicted electronic portal images (EPIs) and DVH metrics corresponding to each data set were extracted using a novel RayStation script. A weighted projection mask was developed for target and OAR structures through considering the intra-angle overlap between fluence and structure contours projected onto the EPIs. The correlation between change in transit fluence and planning target volume (PTV) D98 and spinal cord D0.03cc with and without the weighting mask applied was investigated. PTV D98 was strongly correlated with mean fluence percentage difference both with and without the weighting mask applied (RMask = 0.69, RNo Mask = 0.79, N = 14, p < 0.05), where spinal cord D0.03cc exhibited a weak correlation (RMask = 0.35, RNo Mask = 0.53, N = 7, p > 0.05) however this result was not statistically significant. The simulation toolkit developed in this work provided a useful means to investigate the relationship between change in transit fluence and change in key dosimetric parameters for H&N cancer patients.

Evaluation of automated pre-treatment and transit in-vivo dosimetry in radiotherapy using empirically determined parameters.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: First reports on clinical use of commercially automated systems for Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID)-based dosimetry in radiotherapy showed the capability to detect important changes in patient setup, anatomy and external device position. For this study, results for more than 3000 patients, for both pre-treatment verification and in-vivo transit dosimetry were analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For all Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans, pre-treatment quality assurance (QA) with EPID images was performed. In-vivo dosimetry using transit EPID images was analyzed, including causes and actions for failed fractions for all patients receiving photon treatment (2018-2019). In total 3136 and 32,632 fractions were analyzed with pre-treatment and transit images respectively. Parameters for gamma analysis were empirically determined, balancing the rate between detection of clinically relevant problems and the number of false positive results. RESULTS: Pre-treatment and in-vivo results depended on machine type. Causes for failed in-vivo analysis included deviations in patient positioning (32%) and anatomy change (28%). In addition, errors in planning, imaging, treatment delivery, simulation, breath hold and with immobilization devices were detected. Actions for failed fractions were mostly to repeat the measurement while taking extra care in positioning (54%) and to intensify imaging procedures (14%). Four percent initiated plan adjustments, showing the potential of the system as a basis for adaptive planning. CONCLUSIONS: EPID-based pre-treatment and in-vivo transit dosimetry using a commercially available automated system efficiently revealed a wide variety of deviations and showed potential to serve as a basis for adaptive planning.

Optimising the use of EPIgray for 3DCRT breast treatments.

EPIgray is an in-vivo dosimetry system which uses electronic portal images to calculate dose delivered to a point of interest (POI) and the percentage dose difference (%DDiff) from expected dose. For 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) of breasts, a small shift between patient position on treatment compared to the planning CT is often clinically accepted. However due to the use of the planning CT in the EPIgray back-projection algorithm, acceptable shifts can have undue impact on EPIgray dose so it does not reflect true POI dose. At our centre ± 5.0% %DDiff tolerance is used for all treatment sites, however for breast treatments this effect causes false positive (FP) results, which may mean an actual treatment error is not detected. Patient position can be better represented within EPIgray using a contour correction (CC) method, increasing dose calculation accuracy. A custom breast-lung phantom was developed to validate use of CC, then EPIgray data of 30 breast patients were retrospectively analysed with CC. %DDiff before and after CC identified a FP rate. A process to determine optimal EPIgray tolerances for breast 3DCRT to reduce incidence of FP results is presented, based on analysis of factors influencing %DDiff and a receiver operator characteristic curve analysis of the retrospective study data. This process determined that a reduced tolerance of ± 3.5% would optimise utility of the EPIgray results, but this would require additional clinical resources to investigate the correspondingly increased rate of false negative results. Choice of tolerance requires consideration of workload and aims of the IVD program.

Simultaneous Measurement of In vivo and Transit Mid-Plane Doses with Ionization Chambers in Gynecological Malignancy Patients Undergoing Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to estimate delivered radiation doses inside planning tumor volume (PTV) using the in vivo (mid-plane dose) measurement and transit measurement methods in gynecological malignancy patients undergoing three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) using calibrated ionization chambers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with histopathologically proven carcinoma of the cervix or endometrium were planned with four-field 3DCRT to the pelvic site. Isocenter was at the geometric mid-plane of PTV with a dose prescription of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Clinical mid-plane dose (D iso, Transit) estimates were done in one method (transit) using the FC-65 positioned at electronic portal imaging device level. In another method, a repeat computerized tomography scan was performed (at the 11th fraction) using CC-13 having a protective cap in the vaginal cavity for in vivo measurements (D in vivo ). Simultaneous measurements were performed with the two chambers from the 11th fraction onward at least 3-4 times during the remaining course of treatment. RESULTS: The agreement of mean doses from these two described methods and treatment planning system reference doses was in the range of -4.4 ± 1.1% (minimum) to -0.3 ± 2.0% (maximum) and -4.0 ± 1.7% (minimum) to 1.9 ± 2.4% for D in vivo and D iso, Transit , respectively, which are an acceptable range of daily radiation dose delivery. CONCLUSION: The fundamental importance of this study lies in simultaneous validation of delivered dose in real time with two methods. A study in this small number of patients has given the confidence to apply transit measurements for quality assurance on a routine basis as an accepted clinical dosimetry for the selected patients.

A collapsed-cone based transit EPID dosimetry method.

PURPOSE: To develop a transit-dose portal dosimetry method based on a commercial collapsed-cone algorithm. METHODS: A Varian Clinac21EX (Varian Medical Systems, USA), equipped with an amorphous-silicon EPID aS1000, was used. Dose calculations were performed with the collapsed-cone algorithm of Pinnacle3 v8.0 m (Philips Medical Systems, USA). A model for the energy of 6 MV was made in Pinnacle3 and afterwards validated for clinical use. A virtual phantom with different densities was contoured and superimposed on the patient images, simulating the presence of the EPID during the treatment. Corrections for photon spectral variations were introduced using Matlab (Mathworks, USA). Transit dosimetry was verified with an anthropomorphic phantom, on which different treatment fields were simulated in locations of skull, thorax and pelvis. In addition, a prostate treatment with IMRT was administered thereon. Dose distributions were compared with gamma index. RESULTS: The dose differences at the central point did not exceed 2%, except for the 20 x 20 cm2 field size centered in the skull. The model presented in this work, assumes that the dimensions of the solid water phantom, are infinite, except for the thickness. The mean values for the gamma index pass rates were 85.62% for (3%, 3 mm), 91.73% (4%, 3 mm) and 95.68% (5%, 3 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The value of 95% for γ (5%, 3 mm) can be established as the value below which the origin of the discrepancies should be investigated. It should be considered that the proposed method is complementary and not a substitute for pre-treatment dosimetry.

A simple model for transit dosimetry based on a water equivalent EPID.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate a new model for implementing a transit dosimetry system as a means of in vivo dose verification with a water equivalent electronic portal imaging device (WE-EPID) and a conventional treatment planning system (TPS). METHOD AND MATERIALS: A standard amorphous silicon (a-Si) EPID was modified to a WE-EPID configuration by replacing the metal-plate/phosphor screen situated above the photodiode detector with a 3 cm thick water equivalent plastic x ray converter material. A clinical TPS was used to calculate dose to the WE-EPID in its conventional EPID position behind the phantom/patient. The "extended phantom" concept was used to facilitate dose calculation at the EPID position, which is outside the CT field of view (FOV). The CT images were manipulated from 512 × 512 into 1024 × 1024 and padded pixels were assigned the density of air before importing to the TPS. The virtual WE-EPID was added as an RT structure of water density at the EPID plane. The accuracy of TPS dose calculations at the EPID plane in transit geometry was first evaluated for different field sizes and thickness of object in the beam by comparison with the dose measured using a 2D ion chamber array (ICA) and the WE-EPID. Following basic dose response tests, clinical fields including direct single fields (open and wedged) and modulated fields (integrated or control point by control point doses for VMAT) were measured for 6 MV photons with varying of solid water thickness or an anthropomorphic phantom present in beam. The EPID images were corrected for dark signal and pixel sensitivity and converted to dose using a single dose calibration factor. The 2D dose evaluation was conducted using 3%/3 and 2%/2 mm gamma-index criteria. RESULTS: The measured dose-response with the ICA and WE-EPID for all basic dose-response tests agreed with TPS dose calculations to within 1.5%. The maximum difference in dose profiles for the largest measured field size of 25 × 25 cm2 was 2.5%. Gamma evaluation showed at least 94% (3%/3 mm criteria) and 90% (2%/2 mm) agreement in both integrated and control-point doses for all clinical fields acquired by the WE-EPID and ICA when compared with TPS-calculated portal dose images. CONCLUSION: A new approach to transit dose verification has been demonstrated utilizing a water equivalent EPID and a commercial TPS. The accuracy of dose calculations at the EPID plane using a commercial TPS beam model was experimentally confirmed. The model proposed in this study provides an accurate method to directly verify doses delivered during treatment without the additional uncertainties inherent in modelling the complex dose-response of standard EPIDs.

TransitQA - A new method for transit dosimetry of Tomotherapy patients.

PURPOSE: TransitQA is an innovative method for Tomotherapy transit dosimetry using the on-board detector (OBD). Our previously published model for Tomotherapy treatment plan verification (AirQA) has been enhanced to take into account patient and couch transmission. AirQA estimates the OBD signal during irradiation with nothing in the beam path from the leaf control sinogram, allowing us to check whether the planned treatment is correctly delivered by the machine. TransitQA allows us to check the treatment delivery with the patient on the couch, potentially showing the effects of changes in the patient anatomy and delivery errors. METHODS: Patient and couch transmission have been added to the model using the OBD projections of pretreatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT). The difference in the energy spectra between the imaging and treatment beams has been corrected by an exponent from the MVCT projections consisting of the ratio of the mass attenuation coefficients. This exponent has been found to not vary significantly with the atomic number Z, allowing us to apply this procedure to heterogeneous media, such as patients. The attenuated OBD projections acquired during the treatment are compared to the model via a signed global γ-index analysis. The dose criterion was 5% of the 95th percentile of the dose distribution, and the distance to agreement (DTA) was 4 mm. RESULTS: Our method has been applied to a heterogeneous phantom with 98.1% of the points passing the γ-evaluation test, showing that the model can predict the attenuated OBD projection. The method has been applied to two representative patients throughout the whole treatment, highlighting variations in the signal transmission and γ-index. CONCLUSION: This paper establishes the proof-of-concept of transit dosimetry for all patients treated by Tomotherapy. Moreover, this method can be used as a surrogate for in vivo dosimetry.

Implementation and evaluation of a transit dosimetry system for treatment verification.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a formalism for transit dosimetry using a phantom study and prospectively evaluate the protocol on a patient population undergoing 3D conformal radiotherapy. METHODS: Amorphous silicon EPIDs were calibrated for dose and used to acquire images of delivered fields. The measured EPID dose map was back-projected using the planning CT images to calculate dose at pre-specified points within the patient using commercially available software, EPIgray (DOSIsoft, France). This software compared computed back-projected dose with treatment planning system dose. A series of tests were performed on solid water phantoms (linearity, field size effects, off-axis effects). 37 patients were enrolled in the prospective study. RESULTS: The EPID dose response was stable and linear with dose. For all tested field sizes the agreement was good between EPID-derived and treatment planning system dose in the central axis, with performance stability up to a measured depth of 18cm (agreement within -0.5% at 10cm depth on the central axis and within -1.4% at 2cm off-axis). 126 transit images were analysed of 37 3D-conformal patients. Patient results demonstrated the potential of EPIgray with 91% of all delivered fields achieved the initial set tolerance level of ΔD of 0±5-cGy or %ΔD of 0±5%. CONCLUSIONS: The in vivo dose verification method was simple to implement, with very few commissioning measurements needed. The system required no extra dose to the patient, and importantly was able to detect patient position errors that impacted on dose delivery in two of cases.

Clinical results of an EPID-based in-vivo dosimetry method for pelvic cancers treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

The purpose of our work was to investigate the feasibility of using an EPID-based in-vivo dosimetry method initially designed for conformal fields on pelvic dynamic IMRT fields. The method enables a point dose delivered to the patient to be calculated from the transit signal acquired with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). After defining a set of correction factors allowing EPID pixel values to be converted into absolute doses, several tests on homogeneous water-equivalent phantoms were performed to estimate the validity of the method in reference conditions. The effects of different treatment parameters, such as delivered dose, field size dependence and patient thickness were also studied. The model was first evaluated on a group of 53 patients treated by 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and then on 92 patients treated by IMRT, both for pelvic cancers. For each measurement, the dose was reconstructed at the isocenter (DREC) and compared with the dose calculated by our treatment planning system (DTPS). Excellent agreement was found between DREC and DTPS for both techniques. For 3DCRT treatments, the mean deviation between DREC and DTPS for the 211 in-vivo dose verifications was equal to -1.0  ±  2.2% (1SD). Concerning IMRT treatments, the averaged deviation for the 418 fields verified was equal to -0.3 ± 2.6% (1SD) proving that the method is able to reconstruct a dose for dynamic IMRT pelvic fields. Based on these results, tolerance criteria and action levels were established before its implementation in clinical routine.

Commissioning and initial experience with a commercial software for in vivo volumetric dosimetry.

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: Dosimetry Check (DC) (Math Resolutions) is a commercial EPID-based dosimetry software, which allows performing pre-treatment and transit dosimetry. DC provides an independent verification of the treatment, being potentially of great interest due to the high benefits of the in vivo volumetric dosimetry, which guarantee the treatment delivery and anatomy constancy. The aim of this work is to study the differences in dose between DC and the Treatment Planning System (TPS) to establish an accuracy level of the system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: DC v.3.8 was used along with Varian Clinac iX accelerator equipped with EPID aS1000 and Eclipse v.10.0 with AAA and Acuros XB calculation algorithms. The DC evaluated version is based on a pencil beam calculation algorithm. Various plans were generated over several homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms. Isocentre point doses and gamma analysis were evaluated. RESULTS: Total dose differences at the isocentre between DC and TPS for the studied plans are less than 2%, but single field contributions achieve greater values. In the presence of heterogeneities, the discrepancies can reach up to 15%. In transit mode, DC does not consider properly the couch attenuation, especially when there is an air gap between phantom and couch. CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of this in vivo evaluation and the potentiality of this new system have a very positive impact on improving patient QA. But improvements are required in both calculation algorithm and integration with the record and verify system.

[Evaluation of transit in vivo dosimetry using portal imaging and comparison with measurements using diodes]. / Évaluation d'une dosimétrie in vivo de transit utilisant l'imageur portal et comparaison avec les mesures par diodes.

PURPOSE: In vivo dosimetry transit using portal imaging is a promising approach for quality assurance in radiotherapy. A comparative evaluation was conducted between a commercial solution, EPIgray(®) and an in vivo dosimetry control reference using semiconductors diodes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The performance of the two in vivo dosimetry methods was assessed. The primary endpoint was the dose deviation between the reconstructed dose at the prescription point and the measured dose using the ionization chamber in phantoms or the calculated predictive dose by the treatment planning system with patients. The deviation threshold was set to ±5%. In total, 107 patients were prospectively included and treated with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques for tumours of the brain, chest and head and neck. RESULTS: The dosimetric accuracy of EPIgray(®) in phantom were comparable to diodes in terms of repeatability (0.11%), reproducibility (0.29-0.51%) with a mean dose deviation of 0.17% (SD: 1.11). The rates of radiotherapy sessions out of the tolerance for the brain (3D-CRT and IMRT), thorax (3D-CRT) and the head and neck (IMRT) were respectively 0%, 9.6% and 5.3% with a mean dose deviation ranging between 0.49% and 1.53%. The mean of dose deviation between three consecutive sessions with EPIgray(®) validates 99.1% of treatments. CONCLUSION: The performance of EPIgray(®) in in vivo dosimetry is consistent with the recommendations of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and equivalent to semiconductor diodes for 3D-CRT. It also allows adequate control for IMRT, which is technically difficult to perform with the diodes.