Prophylactic manual rotation of occiput posterior and transverse positions to decrease operative delivery: the PROPOP randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Persistent occiput posterior and occiput transverse positions are the most common malpositions of the fetal head during labor and are associated with prolonged second stage of labor, cesarean deliveries, instrumental deliveries, severe perineal tears, postpartum hemorrhage, and chorioamnionitis. Manual rotation is one of several strategies described to deal with these malpositions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if the trial of prophylactic manual rotation at the early second stage of labor is associated with a decrease in operative deliveries (instrumental and/or cesarean deliveries). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial in 4 French hospitals. Women with singleton term pregnancy and occiput posterior or occiput transverse position confirmed by ultrasound at the early second stage of labor and with epidural analgesia were eligible. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to either undergo a trial of prophylactic manual rotation of occiput posterior or occiput transverse position (intervention group) or no trial of prophylactic manual rotation (standard group). The primary outcome was operative delivery (instrumental and/or cesarean deliveries). The secondary outcomes were length of the second stage of labor, maternal complications (postpartum hemorrhage, operative complications during cesarean delivery, episiotomy and perineal tears), and neonatal complications (Apgar score of <5 at 10 minutes, arterial umbilical pH of <7.10, neonatal injuries, neonatal intensive care unit admission). The main analysis was focused on intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: From December 2015 to December 2019, a total of 257 women (mean age, 30.4 years; mean gestational age, 40.1 weeks) were randomized: 126 were assigned to the intervention group and 131 were assigned to the standard group. Operative delivery was significantly less frequent in the intervention group compared with the standard group (29.4% [37 of 126] vs 41.2% [54 of 131]; P=.047; differential [intervention-standard] [95% confidence interval] = -11.8 [-15.7 to -7.9]; unadjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.593 [0.353-0.995]). Women in the intervention group were more likely to have a significantly shorter second stage of labor. CONCLUSION: Trial of prophylactic manual rotation of occiput posterior or occiput transverse positions during the early second stage of labor was statistically associated with a reduced risk of operative delivery. This maneuver could be a safe strategy to prevention operative delivery.

Is there an association between sonographically determined occipito-transverse position in the second stage of labor and operative delivery?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if ultrasound-determined occipito-transverse position early in the second stage of labor is associated with operative delivery. DESIGN: Retrospective review of two prospective cohort studies. SETTING: An Australian tertiary referral hospital. POPULATION: Women with term, cephalic singleton pregnancies. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from two prospective studies. Logistic regression was undertaken to assess the independent contribution of the occipito-transverse position to operative delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Operative delivery (cesarean section, forceps or vacuum extraction). RESULTS: Among 422 women included, the occipito-transverse position was present in 80, occipito-anterior in 303 and the occipito-posterior in 39. Compared with occipito-anterior, the adjusted odds ratio for operative delivery was 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.2-3.8, p = 0.02) for the occipito-transverse position, and 7.4 (95% confidence interval 3.2-17) for the occipito-posterior position. Factors that independently predicted operative delivery were nulliparity, abnormal second stage cardiotocography, maternal place of birth and epidural analgesia. The length of second stage of labor was longer for the occipito-transverse group than for the occipito-anterior group (median 2 h 7 min vs. 1 h 36 min, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The occipito-transverse position early in the second stage of labor was associated with an increased operative delivery rate.

Transverse position. Using rotation to aid normal birth-OUTcomes following manual rotation (the TURN-OUT trial): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The fetal occiput transverse position in the second stage of labor is associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Prophylactic manual rotation in the second stage of labor is considered a safe and easy to perform procedure that has been used to prevent operative deliveries. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of prophylactic manual rotation in the management of the occiput transverse position for preventing operative delivery. We hypothesized that among women who are at ≥37 weeks' gestation with a baby in the occiput transverse position early in the second stage of labor, manual rotation compared with a "sham" rotation will reduce the rate of operative delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blinded, parallel, superiority, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial in 3 tertiary hospitals was conducted in Australia. The primary outcome was operative (cesarean, forceps, or vacuum) delivery. Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery, serious maternal morbidity and mortality, and serious perinatal morbidity and mortality. Outcomes were analyzed by intention to treat. Proportions were compared using χ2 tests adjusted for stratification variables using the Mantel-Haenszel method or Fisher exact test. Planned subgroup analyses by operator experience and technique of manual rotation (digital or whole hand rotation) were performed. The planned sample size was 416 participants (trial registration: ACTRN12613000005752). RESULTS: Here, 160 women with a term pregnancy and a baby in the occiput transverse position in the second stage of labor, confirmed by ultrasound, were randomly assigned to receive either a prophylactic manual rotation (n=80) or a sham procedure (n=80), which was less than our original intended sample size. Operative delivery occurred in 41 of 80 women (51%) assigned to prophylactic manual rotation and 40 of 80 women (50%) assigned to a sham rotation (common risk difference, -4.2% [favors sham rotation]; 95% confidence interval, -21 to 13; P=.63). Among more experienced proceduralists, operative delivery occurred in 24 of 47 women (51%) assigned to manual rotation and 29 of 46 women (63%) assigned to a sham rotation (common risk difference, 11%; 95% confidence interval, -11 to 33; P=.33). Cesarean delivery occurred in 6 of 80 women (7.5%) in the manual rotation group and 7 of 80 women (8.7%) in the sham group. Instrumental (forceps or vacuum) delivery occurred in 35 of 80 women (44%) in the manual rotation group and 33 of 80 women (41%) in the sham group. There was no significant difference in the combined maternal and perinatal outcomes. The trial was terminated early because of limited resources. CONCLUSION: Planned prophylactic manual rotation did not result in fewer operative deliveries. More research is needed in the use of manual rotation from the occiput transverse position for preventing operative deliveries.

Clinical Analysis of 192 Cases with Persistent Occipital-Transverse and Occipital-Posterior Position / 昆明医科大学学报

132 cases of persistent occipital-transverse position and 60 cases of persistent occipital-posterior position were treated in our department in 1987.In this article,the retrospective clinical studies were reported.The former made up 9.21% and the latter made up 4.18% of the total deliveries.The rate of operative delivery was 93.33%.The cause and early diagnosis were discussed.Then we express here our preliminary opinion upon the treatment.