Trial of labor after cesarean, vaginal birth after cesarean, and the risk of uterine rupture: an expert review.

The decision to pursue a trial of labor after cesarean delivery is complex and depends on patient preference, the likelihood of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, assessment of the risks vs benefits of trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and available resources to support safe trial of labor after cesarean delivery at the planned birthing center. The most feared complication of trial of labor after cesarean delivery is uterine rupture, which can have catastrophic consequences, including substantial maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Although the absolute risk of uterine rupture is low, several clinical, historical, obstetrical, and intrapartum factors have been associated with increased risk. It is therefore critical for clinicians managing patients during trial of labor after cesarean delivery to be aware of these risk factors to appropriately select candidates for trial of labor after cesarean delivery and maximize the safety and benefits while minimizing the risks. Caution is advised when considering labor augmentation and induction in patients with a previous cesarean delivery. With established hospital safety protocols that dictate close maternal and fetal monitoring, avoidance of prostaglandins, and careful titration of oxytocin infusion when induction agents are needed, spontaneous and induced trial of labor after cesarean delivery are safe and should be offered to most patients with 1 previous low transverse, low vertical, or unknown uterine incision after appropriate evaluation, counseling, planning, and shared decision-making. Future research should focus on clarifying true risk factors and identifying the optimal approach to intrapartum and induction management, tools for antenatal prediction, and strategies for prevention of uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery. A better understanding will facilitate patient counseling, support efforts to improve trial of labor after cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates, and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery.

Parturition at term: induction, second and third stages of labor, and optimal management of life-threatening complications-hemorrhage, infection, and uterine rupture.

Childbirth is a defining moment in anyone's life, and it occurs 140 million times per year. Largely a physiologic process, parturition does come with risks; one mother dies every two minutes. These deaths occur mostly among healthy women, and many are considered preventable. For each death, 20 to 30 mothers experience complications that compromise their short- and long-term health. The risk of birth extends to the newborn, and, in 2020, 2.4 million neonates died, 25% in the first day of life. Hence, intrapartum care is an important priority for society. The American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology has devoted two special Supplements in 2023 and 2024 to the clinical aspects of labor at term. This article describes the content of the Supplements and highlights new developments in the induction of labor (a comparison of methods, definition of failed induction, new pharmacologic agents), management of the second stage, the value of intrapartum sonography, new concepts on soft tissue dystocia, optimal care during the third stage, and common complications that account for maternal death, such as infection, hemorrhage, and uterine rupture. All articles are available to subscribers and non-subscribers and have supporting video content to enhance dissemination and improve intrapartum care. Our hope is that no mother suffers because of lack of information.

Accuracy of sonographic lower segment thickness and prediction of vaginal birth after caesarean in a resourced-limited setting; Prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness against findings at laparotomy, and to investigate its correlation with the success rate of vaginal birth after one previous caesarean delivery (CD) in a resource-limited setting. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Obstetrics and Gynaecology department in a tertiary hospital in Ghana. POPULATION: Women with one previous CD undergoing either a trial of labour (TOLAC) or elective CD. METHODS: Myometrial lower uterine segment thickness (mLUS) and full lower uterine segment thickness (fLUS) were measured with transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS). The women were managed according to local protocols with the clinicians blinded to the ultrasound measurements. The LUS was measured intraoperatively for comparison with ultrasound measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lower uterine segment findings at laparotomy, successful vaginal birth. RESULTS: A total of 311 pregnant women with one previous CD were enrolled; 147 women underwent elective CD and 164 women underwent a TOLAC. Of the women that underwent TOLAC, 96 (58.5%) women had a successful vaginal birth. The mLUS was comparable to the intraoperative measurement in the elective CD group with LUS thickness <5 mm (bias of 0.01, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.12 mm) whereas fLUS overestimated LUS <5 mm (bias of 0.93, 95% CI 0.80-1.06 mm). Successful vaginal birth rate correlated with increasing mLUS values (odds ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.64). Twelve cases of uterine defect were recorded. LUS measurement ≤2.0 mm was associated with an increased risk of uterine defects with a sensitivity of 91.7% (95% CI 61.5-99.8%) and specificity of 81.8% (95% CI 75.8-86.8%). CONCLUSION: Accurate TVUS measurement of the LUS is technically feasible in a resource-limited setting. This approach could help in making safer decisions on mode of birth in limited-resource settings.

Clinical analysis of complete uterine rupture during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Uterine rupture in pregnant women can lead to serious adverse outcomes. This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of patients with complete uterine rupture. METHODS: Data from 33 cases of surgically confirmed complete uterine rupture at Chenzhou No.1 People's Hospital between January 2015 and December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In total, 31,555 pregnant women delivered in our hospital during the study period. Of these, approximately 1‰ (n = 33) had complete uterine rupture. The average gestational age at complete uterine rupture was 31+4 weeks (13+1-40+3 weeks), and the average bleeding volume was 1896.97 ml (200-6000 ml). Twenty-six patients (78.79%) had undergone more than two deliveries. Twenty-five women (75.76%) experienced uterine rupture after a cesarean section, two (6.06%) after fallopian tube surgery, one (3.03%) after laparoscopic cervical cerclage, and one (3.03%) after wedge resection of the uterine horn, and Fifteen women (45.45%) presented with uterine rupture at the original cesarean section incision scar. Thirteen patients (39.39%) were transferred to our hospital after their initial diagnosis. Seven patients (21.21%) had no obvious symptoms, and only four patients (12.12%) had typical persistent lower abdominal pain. There were 13 cases (39.39%, including eight cases ≥ 28 weeks old) of fetal death in utero and two cases (6.06%, both full term) of severe neonatal asphyxia. The rates of postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy were 66.67%, 63.64%, and 21.21%. Maternal death occurred in one case (3.03%). CONCLUSIONS: The site of the uterine rupture was random, and was often located at the weakest point of the uterus. There is no effective means for detecting or predicting the weakest point of the uterus. Rapid recognition is key to the treatment of uterine rupture.

Evaluation of incision healing status after transverse uterine fundal incision for cesarean delivery and postoperative pregnancy: a ten-year single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Transverse uterine fundal incision (TUFI) is a beneficial procedure for mothers and babies at risk due to placenta previa-accreta, and has been implemented worldwide. However, the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent pregnancy remains unclear. We therefore evaluated the TUFI wound scar to determine the approval criteria for pregnancy after this surgery. METHODS: Between April 2012 and August 2022, we performed TUFI on 150 women. Among 132 of the 150 women whose uteruses were preserved after TUFI, 84 women wished to conceive again. The wound healing status, scar thickness, and resumption of blood flow were evaluated in these women by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and sonohysterogram at 12 months postoperatively. Furthermore, TUFI scars were directly observed during the Cesarean sections in women who subsequently conceived. RESULTS: Twelve women were lost to follow-up and one conceived before the evaluation, therefore 71 cases were analyzed. MRI scans revealed that the "scar thickness", the thinnest part of the scar compared with the normal surrounding area, was ≥ 50% in all cases. The TUFI scars were enhanced in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI except for four women. However, the scar thickness in these four patients was greater than 80%. Twenty-three of the 71 women conceived after TUFI and delivered live babies without notable problems until August 2022. Their MRI scans before pregnancy revealed scar thicknesses of 50-69% in two cases and ≥ 70% in the remaining 21 cases. And resumption of blood flow was confirmed in all patients except two cases whose scar thickness ≥ 90%. No evidence of scar healing failure was detected at subsequent Cesarean sections, but partial thinning was found in two patients whose scar thicknesses were 50-69%. In one woman who conceived seven months after TUFI and before the evaluation, uterine rupture occurred at 26 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS: Certain criteria, including an appropriate suture method, delayed conception for at least 12 months, evaluation of the TUFI scar at 12 months postoperatively, and cautious postoperative management, must all be met in order to approve a post-TUFI pregnancy. Possible scar condition criteria for permitting a subsequent pregnancy could include the scar thickness being ≥ 70% of the surrounding area on MRI scans, at least partially resumed blood flow, and no abnormalities on the sonohysterogram. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Trauma in pregnancy: A narrative review of the current literature.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma accounts for nearly half of all deaths of pregnant women. Pregnant women have distinct physiologic and anatomic characteristics which complicate their management following major trauma. OBJECTIVE: This paper comprises a narrative review of the most recent literature informing the management of pregnant trauma patients. DISCUSSION: The incidence of trauma during pregnancy is 6-8%. The focus of clinical assessment must be on the mother, starting with the primary survey. During airway management, clinicians should consider early intubation if necessary and utilize gastric tubes to minimize the risk of aspiration. Pregnant women experience progesterone-mediated hyperventilation, and normal PaCO2 levels may portend imminent respiratory failure. Clinicians should utilize left lateral tilt in hypotensive pregnant women to displace the uterus off the inferior vena cava. Ultrasonography is an attractive imaging modality for pregnant women which is specific for ruling in intraabdominal hemorrhage but not sufficiently sensitive to exclude this diagnosis. Clinicians should not hesitate to order computed tomography imaging in unstable patients if there is diagnostic ambiguity. Cardiotocographic monitoring simultaneously assesses uterine contractions and fetal heart rate and should last at least 4 h for pregnant women following even minor abdominal trauma if their fetus has achieved viable gestational age (approximately 24 weeks). In the event of cardiac arrest, peri-mortem cesarean section may improve outcomes for the mother and fetus alike. Unique specific complications include uterine rupture and placental abruption, which require emergent resuscitation and obstetrics consultation for definitive management. Emergency clinicians should maintain a low threshold for transfer to a tertiary care center given correlations between even isolated and relatively minor traumatic injuries with adverse fetal and maternal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in pregnant women. Emergency clinicians must understand the evaluation and management of pregnant trauma patients.

The global burden, risk and inequality of maternal obstructed labor and uterine rupture from 1990 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Obstructed labor (OL) and uterine rupture (UR) are common obstetric complications. This study explored the burden, risk factors, decomposition, and health inequalities associated with OL and UR to improve global maternal health. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis study including data on OL and UR from the Global Burden of Diseases, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019. The main outcome measures included the number and age-standardized rate (ASR) of incidence, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), prevalence, and deaths. RESULTS: The global burden of OL and UR has declined, with a decrease in incidence (number in 2019: 9,410,500.87, 95%UI 11,730,030.94 to 7,564,568.91; ASR in 2019: 119.64 per 100,000, 95%UI 149.15 to 96.21; estimated annual percentage change [EAPC] from 1990 to 2019: -1.34, 95% CI -1.41 to -1.27) and prevalence over time. However, DALYs (number in 2019: 999,540.67, 95%UI 1,209,749.35 to 817,352.49; ASR in 2019: 12.92, 95%UI 15.63 to 10.56; EAPC from 1990 to 2019: -0.91, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.57) and deaths remain significant. ASR of DALYs increased for the 10-14 year-old age group (2.01, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.5), the 15-19 year-old age group (0.07, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.61), Andean Latin America (3.47, 95% CI 3.05 to 3.89), and Caribbean (4.16, 95% CI 6 to 4.76). Iron deficiency was identified as a risk factor for OL and UR, and its impact varied across different socio-demographic indices (SDIs). Decomposition analysis showed that population growth primarily contributed to the burden, especially in low SDI regions. Health inequalities were evident, the slope and intercept for DALYs were - 47.95 (95% CI -52.87 to -43.02) and - 29.29 (95% CI -32.95 to -25.63) in 1990, 39.37 (95%CI 36.29 to 42.45) and 24.87 (95%CI 22.56 to 27.18) in 2019. Concentration indices of ASR-DALYs were - 0.2908 in 1990 and - 0.2922 in 2019. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the significant burden of OL and UR and emphasizes the need for continuous efforts to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity. Understanding risk factors and addressing health inequalities are crucial for the development of effective interventions and policies to improve maternal health outcomes globally.

Accidental uterine extensions in cesarean deliveries - outcome of subsequent pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the obstetric, maternal and neonatal outcome in the subsequent pregnancy after a pregnancy with an accidental uterine extension (AUE) during cesarean delivery (CD), as well as the relationship between the different types of AUE (inferior, lateral and superior). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all CD with AUE in a tertiary medical center between 01/2011-01/2022. Women with a prior CD with AUE were compared to a 1:3 ratio matched control group of women with a prior CD without AUE. All AUE were defined in their direction, size and mode of suturing. CD with deliberate uterine extensions were excluded. We evaluated obstetric, maternal and neonatal outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy after a pregnancy with AUE during CD. RESULTS: Comparing women with a prior CD with AUE (n=177) to the matched control group of women with a prior CD without AUE (n=528), we found no significant differences in proportions of uterine rupture or any other major complication or adverse outcome between the groups. There were no significant differences in the outcomes of the subsequent pregnancy in relation to the characteristics of the AUE (direction, size and mode of suturing). CONCLUSIONS: Subsequent pregnancies after AUE are not associated with higher maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes including higher proportions of uterine rupture compared to pregnancies without previous AUE. Different characteristics of the AUE do not impact the outcome.

Risk factors for maternal complications following uterine rupture: a 12-year single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To determine maternal outcomes and risk factors for composite maternal morbidity following uterine rupture during pregnancy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including all women diagnosed with uterine rupture during pregnancy, between 2011 and 2023, at a single-center. Patients with partial uterine rupture or dehiscence were excluded. We compared women who had composite maternal morbidity following uterine rupture to those without. Composite maternal morbidity was defined as any of the following: maternal death; hysterectomy; severe postpartum hemorrhage; disseminated intravascular coagulation; injury to adjacent organs; admission to the intensive care unit; or the need for relaparotomy. The primary outcome was risk factors associated with composite maternal morbidity following uterine rupture. The secondary outcome was the incidence of maternal and neonatal complications following uterine rupture. RESULTS: During the study period, 147,037 women delivered. Of them, 120 were diagnosed with uterine rupture. Among these, 44 (36.7%) had composite maternal morbidity. There were no cases of maternal death and two cases of neonatal death (1.7%); packed cell transfusion was the major contributor to maternal morbidity [occurring in 36 patients (30%)]. Patients with composite maternal morbidity, compared to those without, were characterized by: increased maternal age (34.7 vs. 32.8 years, p = 0.03); lower gestational age at delivery (35 + 5 vs. 38 + 1 weeks, p = 0.01); a higher rate of unscarred uteri (22.7% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.01); and rupture occurring outside the lower uterine segment (52.3% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Uterine rupture entails increased risk for several adverse maternal outcomes, though possibly more favorable than previously described. Numerous risk factors for composite maternal morbidity following rupture exist and should be carefully assessed in these patients.

Continuity obstetric care demonstrates greater vaginal birth after caesarean success.

BACKGROUND: Australia's caesarean rate is higher than Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average, and is rising. Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is safe for selected women. Midwifery continuity of care (CoC) is associated with higher rates of vaginal birth compared to other models; however, impacts on VBAC attempts and success are unknown. AIMS: The primary aim was to determine if there is a difference in achieving VBAC between CoC and non-CoC (NCoC) models. The secondary aim was to determine if there is a difference in the proportion of women attempting VBAC between these models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of antenatal records and birthing data of all women who birthed in 2021 with one or more previous caesareans. Women were included if they had two or fewer caesareans. Women were excluded if contraindications to VBAC existed. RESULTS: There were 142/1109 (12.8%) women who had previous caesareans and were eligible to attempt VBAC. There were 47/109 (43.1%) women who attempted vaginal birth after one caesarean with 78.7% success. After one caesarean, women in CoC were more likely to achieve VBAC than NCoC (45.2% vs 26.1%; relative risk (RR) 1.76, 95% CI 1.04-3.00), although when stratified by private and midwifery CoC models, women in midwifery CoC models were more likely to be successful (private RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-2.07 vs midwifery RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.50-4.11). Women in CoC were more likely to attempt VBAC (54.7% vs 34.8%; RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02-2.41), and receive counselling about VBAC (92.5% vs 62%; RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.41-3.11). CONCLUSION: CoC improves the rate of attempted and successful VBAC through several factors, including increased counselling and greater provision of birth choices.

Spontaneous second trimester rupture of a previous caesarean section scar: A case report.

Spontaneous uterine rupture before the onset of labour is rare in pregnancy especially before the third trimester. It is life threatening with devastating consequences to the mother and fetus. We report a case of spontaneous second trimester uterine rupture in a multipara with a previous uterine scar with the aim of creating awareness and sharing the challenges in diagnosis and management of this unusual complication of pregnancy. A 34-year-old woman with two previous deliveries presented at 16 weeks gestation with abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding of one day duration. At presentation, she was pale and in shock. There was generalized abdominal tenderness with guarding and rebound tenderness. At laparotomy, there was uterine rupture involving the lower segment with right lateral upward extension which was repaired. She remained stable at the follow up visit. In conclusion, Spontaneous uterine rupture of a previous caesarean section scar in the second trimester is rare. The diagnosis should be considered in a woman with previous caesarean section who experience an acute abdomen in the second trimester of pregnancy.

La rupture utérine spontanée avant le début du travail est rare pendant la grossesse, surtout avant le troisième trimestre. Elle met la vie en danger et entraîne des conséquences dévastatrices pour la mère et le fœtus. Nous rapportons un cas de rupture utérine spontanée au deuxième trimestre chez une multipare présentant une cicatrice utérine antérieure dans le but de sensibiliser et de partager les défis du diagnostic et de la prise en charge de cette complication inhabituelle de la grossesse. Une femme de 34 ans ayant déjà accouché deux fois s'est présentée à 16 semaines de gestation avec des douleurs abdominales et des saignements vaginaux d'une durée d'un jour. Lors de la présentation, elle était pâle et sous le choc. Il y avait une sensibilité abdominale généralisée avec une sensibilité de garde et de rebond. Lors de la laparotomie, il y a eu une rupture utérine impliquant le segment inférieur avec extension latérale droite vers le haut qui a été réparée. Elle est restée stable lors de la visite de suivi. En conclusion, la rupture utérine spontanée d'une cicatrice de césarienne antérieure au deuxième trimestre est rare. Le diagnostic doit être envisagé chez une femme ayant déjà subi une césarienne et présentant un abdomen aigu au cours du deuxième trimestre de la grossesse.

Uterine scars after caesarean delivery: From histology to the molecular and ultrastructural level.

Uterine rupture during a trial of labor after caesarean delivery (CD) is a serious complication for mother and fetus. The lack of knowledge on histological features and molecular pathways of uterine wound healing has hindered research in this area from evolving over time. We analysed collagen content and turnover in uterine scars on a histological, molecular and ultrastructural level. Therefore, tissue samples from the lower uterine segment were obtained during CD from 16 pregnant women with at least one previous CD, from 16 pregnant women without previous CD, and from 16 non-pregnant premenopausal women after hysterectomy for a benign disease. Histomorphometrical collagen quantification showed, that the collagen content of the scar area in uterine wall specimens after previous CD was significantly higher than in the unscarred myometrium of the same women and the control groups. Quantitative real-time PCR of uterine scar tissue from FFPE samples delineated by laser microdissection yielded a significantly higher COL3A1 expression and a significantly lower COL1A2/COL3A1 ratio in scarred uteri than in samples from unscarred uteri. Histological collagen content and the expression of COL1A2 and COL3A1 were positively correlated, while COL1A2/COL3A1 ratio was negatively correlated with the histological collagen content. Transmission electron microscopy revealed a destroyed myometrial ultrastructure in uterine scars with increased collagen density. We conclude that the high collagen content in uterine scars results from an ongoing overexpression of collagen I and III. This is a proof of concept to enable further analyses of specific factors that mediate uterine wound healing.

Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture in women with unscarred, preterm or prelabour uteri: data from the international network of obstetric survey systems.

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of atypical cases of uterine rupture, namely, uterine rupture occurring in unscarred, preterm or prelabour uteri. DESIGN: Descriptive multi-country population-based study. SETTING: Ten high-income countries within the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems. POPULATION: Women with unscarred, preterm or prelabour ruptured uteri. METHODS: We merged prospectively collected individual patient data in ten population-based studies of women with complete uterine rupture. In this analysis, we focused on women with uterine rupture of unscarred, preterm or prelabour ruptured uteri. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, women's characteristics, presentation and maternal and perinatal outcome. RESULTS: We identified 357 atypical uterine ruptures in 3 064 923 women giving birth. Estimated incidence was 0.2 per 10 000 women (95% CI 0.2-0.3) in the unscarred uteri, 0.5 (95% CI 0.5-0.6) in the preterm uteri, 0.7 (95% CI 0.6-0.8) in the prelabour uteri, and 0.5 (95% CI 0.4-0.5) in the group with no previous caesarean. Atypical uterine rupture resulted in peripartum hysterectomy in 66 women (18.5%, 95% CI 14.3-23.5%), three maternal deaths (0.84%, 95% CI 0.17-2.5%) and perinatal death in 62 infants (19.7%, 95% CI 15.1-25.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Uterine rupture in preterm, prelabour or unscarred uteri are extremely uncommon but were associated with severe maternal and perinatal outcome. We found a mix of risk factors in unscarred uteri, most preterm uterine ruptures occurred in caesarean-scarred uteri and most prelabour uterine ruptures in 'otherwise' scarred uteri. This study may increase awareness among clinicians and raise suspicion of the possibility of uterine rupture under these less expected conditions.

Uterine rupture after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of adenomyosis: a case report and literature review.

AIM: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a non-invasive treatment of adenomyosis. Uterine rupture during pregnancy is a rare adverse event after HIFU treatment, because HIFU treatment results in tissue coagulative necrosis. METHODS: We reported a case of uterine rupture in a 34-year-old woman. The woman had HIFU treatment for adenomyosis eight months before unplanned pregnancy. She was closely monitored during the pregnancy and the antenatal course was uneventful. At the gestational age of 38 weeks and 2 days, an emergency lower segment cesarean section was performed because of inexplainable abdominal pain. After delivery of the fetus, a 2 × 2 cm serous membrane rupture was observed in the HIFU treatment area. CONCLUSION: Uterine rupture during pregnancy after HIFU is a rare adverse event, however, attention is required during the whole pregnancy in case of unexpected uterine rupture.

Intestinal obstruction in pregnancy-a rare presentation of uterine perforation.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal obstruction is an uncommon non-obstetric condition during pregnancy which may cause maternal and fetal mortality. Clinicians are confronted with challenges in diagnosis and treatment of intestinal obstruction due to the overlapping symptoms, concerns over radiological evaluation, and surgical risks. CASE PRESENTATION: We reported a 39-year old, gravida 7, para 2, woman who suffered from acute intestinal obstruction at 34 weeks of gestation. Ultrasonography and abdominal computed tomography were applied for intestinal obstruction diagnose. Conservative treatment was initially attempted. But following ultrasound found the absence of fluid in the amniotic sac and the patient showed no improvement in clinical symptoms. An emergency caesarean section was then performed. Intra-operative assessment showed dense adhesion between the left wall of uterus and omentum, descending colon, and sigmoid colon. After adhesion dialysis, uterine rupture with complete opening of the uterine wall at the site of left uterine cornua was found without active bleeding. The uterine rupture was then repaired. CONCLUSIONS: Although uncommon during pregnancy, clinical suspicion of bowel obstruction is necessary especially in women with a history of abdominal surgery. Surgical intervention is indicated when conservative therapy fails and when there are signs of abnormal fetal conditions and worsened symptoms.

Conservative management of complete fetal expulsion into the abdominal cavity after silent uterine rupture - case report.

BACKGROUND: Clinically silent uterine rupture with complete fetal expulsion into the abdominal cavity is an extremely rare complication. Diagnosis can be difficult and the risk to the mother and fetus is high. Conservative management has been described only in a few cases of partial expulsion of the fetus so far. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of 43-year-old tercigravida with a history of previous laparotomic myomectomy and subsequent cesarean section. The subsequent pregnancy was complicated by uterine wall loosening and rupture at the site of the previous uterine scar after myomectomy and complete fetal expulsion into the abdominal cavity. The diagnosis was made at 24 + 6 weeks of gestation. Considering the absence of clinical symptomatology and the good condition of the fetus, a conservative approach was chosen with intensive monitoring of the maternal and fetal conditions. The pregnancy ended by elective cesarean section and hysterectomy at 28 + 0 weeks of gestation. The postpartum course was uneventful and the newborn was discharged to home care 63 days after delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal expulsion into the abdominal cavity after silent uterine rupture of the scarred uterus may be accompanied by minimal symptomatology making early diagnosis difficult. This rare complication must be considered in the differential diagnosis in women after major uterine surgery. In selected cases and under conditions of intensive maternal and fetal monitoring, conservative management may be chosen to reduce the risks associated with prematurity.

Impact of adenomyosis on perinatal outcomes: a large cohort study (JSOG database).

BACKGROUND: A previous study investigated the effect of adenomyosis on perinatal outcomes. Some studies have reported varying effect of adenomyosis on pregnancy outcomes in some patients and dependence on the degree and subtype of uterine lesions. To elucidate the impact of adenomyosis on perinatal outcomes. METHODS: This large-scale cohort study used the perinatal registry database of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. A dataset of 203,745 mothers who gave birth between January 2020 and December 2020 in Japan was included in the study. The participants were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of adenomyosis. Information regarding the use of fertility treatment, delivery, obstetric complications, maternal treatments, infant, fetal appendages, obstetric history, underlying diseases, infectious diseases, use of drugs, and maternal and infant death were compared between the groups. RESULTS: In total, 1,204 participants had a history of adenomyosis and 151,105 did not. The adenomyosis group had higher rates of uterine rupture (0.2% vs. 0.01%, P = 0.02) and placenta accreta (2.0% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001) than the non-adenomyosis group. A history of adenomyosis (odds ratio: 2.26; 95% confidence interval: 1.43-3.27; P < 0.001), uterine rupture (odds ratio: 3.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.89-19.65; P = 0.02), placental abruption (odds ratio: 2.11; 95% confidence interval: 1.27-3.31; P < 0.01), and fetal growth restriction (odds ratio: 2.66; 95% confidence interval: 2.00-3.48; P < 0.01) were independent risk factors for placenta accreta. CONCLUSION: Adenomyosis in pregnancies is associated with an increased risk of placenta accreta, uterine rupture, placental abruption, and fetal growth restriction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Institutional Review Board of Tottori University Hospital (IRB no. 21A244).

Second stage duration and delivery outcomes among women laboring after cesarean with no prior vaginal delivery.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the association of the duration of the second stage with labor after cesarean (LAC) success and other outcomes among women with one prior cesarean delivery (CD) and no prior vaginal births. METHODS: All women undergoing LAC that reached the second stage of labor from March 2011 to March 2020 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was the mode of delivery by second stage duration. The secondary outcomes included adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. We allocated the study cohort into five groups of second stage duration. Further analysis compared <3 to ≥3 h of second stage based on prior studies. LAC success rates were compared. Composite maternal outcome was defined as the presence of uterine rupture/dehiscence, postpartum hemorrhage, or intrapartum/postpartum fever. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred ninety seven deliveries were included. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) rates decreased as the second stage length time interval increased: 96.4% at <1 h, 94.9% at 1 to <2 h, 94.6% at 2 to <3 h, 92.1% at 3 to <4 h and 79.5% at ≥4 h (p < 0.001). Operative vaginal and CDs were significantly more likely as second stage duration time interval increased (p < 0.001). The composite maternal outcome was comparable among groups (p = 0.226). When comparing the outcomes of deliveries at <3 h versus ≥3 h, the composite maternal outcome and neonatal seizure rates were lower in the <3 h group (p = 0.041 and p = 0.047, respectively). CONCLUSION: Vaginal birth after cesarean rates decreased as second stage time interval length increased. Even with prolonged second stage, VBAC rates remained relatively high. Increased risk of composite adverse maternal outcomes and neonatal seizures were observed when the second stage lasted 3 h or more.

Measurement of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness to Detect Uterine Scar Defect: Comparison of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: Lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness measurement using transabdominal ultrasound (TA-US), transvaginal ultrasound (TV-US), or the combination of both methods can detect scar defect in women with prior cesarean. We aimed to compare the sensitivity of three approaches. METHODS: Women with prior cesarean underwent LUS thickness measurement at 34-38 weeks' gestation. Among those who underwent repeat cesarean before labor, we compared the accuracy of TA-US, TV-US, and the thinner of the two measurements (the "combined measurement") for uterine scar dehiscence using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating curves with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the three approaches using a cut-off of 2.3 mm based on prior literature. RESULTS: We included 747 participants. The mean LUS thickness was greater with TA-US (3.8 ± 1.6 mm) compared with TV-US (3.5 ± 1.9 mm) or the combined measurement (3.2 ± 1.5 mm; P < .001). The AUC was 78% (95% CI: 69%-87%), 85% (95% CI: 79%-91%), and 88% (95% CI: 82%-93%), respectively (all with P < .001). The AUC difference between TA-US and the combined measurement was not significant (P = .057). A LUS below 2.3 mm would have predicted 9 (45%) of the 20 cases of uterine scar dehiscence using TA-US, 17 (85%) using TV-US, and 18 (90%) using the combined measurement (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The choice of ultrasound approach influences the measurement of the LUS thickness. The combination of the TA-US and TV-US seems to be superior for the detection of uterine dehiscence.

Fetomaternal outcome of scarred uterine rupture compared with primary uterine rupture: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Literature comparing maternal and perinatal outcomes among women with scarred and primary uterine rupture are limited. Therefore, the study aimed to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes and associated risk factors of uterine rupture among scarred and unscarred uterus. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed at a large tertiary care of India between July 1, 2011 and June 30, 2020. We analysed all the cases of complete uterine rupture beyond the 20th week of gestation. The outcome measures were live birth rate, perinatal mortality, maternal mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 115 complete uterine ruptures were noted in 148,102 pregnancies. Of those 115 uterine ruptures, 89 (77.3 %) uterine ruptures occurred in women with a history of caesarean delivery, and 26 (22.6 %) uterine ruptures occurred in primary uterine rupture. The primary uterine rupture group had a significantly higher incidence of lower parity, breech presentation and mean birth weight. The live birth rate (68.18% vs. 42.85 %; p=0.04) was significantly higher in the scarred group, and the stillbirth rate (57.14% vs. 31.86 %; p=0.009) was significantly higher in the primary uterine rupture group. Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, APGAR score, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were comparable. Postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion, severe acute maternal morbidity and intensive care unit stay were more frequently reported in the primary uterine rupture group. CONCLUSIONS: The maternal and perinatal outcomes appear less favourable among women with primary uterine rupture than scarred uterine rupture.