Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 423
Filtrar
Más filtros

Publication year range
1.
West Afr J Med ; 41(3): 293-300, 2024 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38788122

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Post-abortion care (PAC) is a crucial component of emergency obstetric care, and many of the primary health care centres (PHC) in the internally displaced person (IDP) camps and host communities in Maiduguri lack it. Improved access to high-quality PACs is essential for meeting the reproductive health needs of the IDPs and reducing the maternal morbidity and mortality that can result from miscarriages. OBJECTIVE: To determine the trend in managing miscarriages in the IDP camps and host communities in Maiduguri and the impact of the volunteer obstetrician scheme (VOS) on PAC. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a longitudinal study in selected PHCs serving IDP camps and host communities in Maiduguri. The study spanned five (5) years, and we compared the management of miscarriages and PAC services one year before the VOS project, two years during the project and two years after the project. During the two-year VOS project, staff manning the PHCs had supportive supervision with hands-on training on PAC. Chi-square for trend and odd ratio with a 95% confidence interval was used as appropriate to compare the trend in PAC services provided during the study period. RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred and eight (1808) women presented with miscarriages, and 1562 (86.4%) required uterine evacuation. Medical evacuation with oral misoprostol was offered to 974 (62.4%), and manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) was used in 422 (27.0%) of the women who needed uterine evacuation. There was a statistically significant rise in the use of medical evacuation throughout the study period (52.2% before VOS, and 71.4% by the second year of VOS) with ꭓ2=41.64 and P<0.001. In comparison, the use of MVA fell from 38.6% in 2015 to 27.7% in 2019 (ꭓ2=34.74 and P<0.001). Similar rising trends were also observed in postabortion family planning acceptance (ꭓ2=22.27, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Volunteer Obstetrician Scheme project appears to have improved PAC services, especially medical evacuation and family planning uptake in the PHCs in IDP camps and host communities in Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria. We recommend task shifting of PAC services and periodic supportive supervision to ensure the quality of care.


CONTEXTE: Les soins après avortement (PAC) sont une composante cruciale des soins obstétricaux d'urgence, et de nombreux centres de soins de santé primaires (PHC) dans les camps de personnes déplacées internes (PDI) et les communautés d'accueil à Maiduguri en sont dépourvus. Un accès amélioré à des PAC de haute qualité est essentiel pour répondre aux besoins de santé reproductive des PDI et réduire la morbidité et la mortalité maternelles qui peuvent résulter des fausses couches. OBJECTIF: Déterminer la tendance dans la gestion des fausses couches dans les camps de PDI et les communautés d'accueil à Maiduguri et l'impact du Programme de bénévoles obstétriciens (VOS) sur la PAC. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons mené une étude longitudinale dans des PHC sélectionnés desservant des camps de PDI et des communautés d'accueil à Maiduguri. L'étude a duré cinq (5) ans, et nous avons comparé la gestion des fausses couches et les services de PAC un an avant le projet VOS, deux ans pendant le projet et deux ans après le projet. Pendant les deux ans du projet VOS, le personnel des PHC a bénéficié d'une supervision avec formation pratique sur la PAC. Le chi carré pour la tendance et le rapport de cotes avec un intervalle de confiance de 95% ont été utilisés, le cas échéant, pour comparer la tendance des services de PAC fournis pendant la période de l'étude. RÉSULTATS: Mille huit cent huit (1808) femmes ont présenté des fausses couches, et 1562 (86,4%) ont nécessité une évacuation utérine. Une évacuation médicale avec du misoprostol oral a été proposée à 974 (62,4%), et l'aspiration manuelle sous vide (AMV) a été utilisée chez 422 (27,0%) des femmes ayant besoin d'une évacuation utérine. On a observé une augmentation statistiquement significative de l'utilisation de l'évacuation médicale tout au long de la période de l'étude (52,2% avant le VOS et 71,4% la deuxième année du VOS) avec ꭓ2=41,64 et P<0,001. En revanche, l'utilisation de l'AMV est passée de 38,6% en 2015 à 27,7% en 2019 (ꭓ2=34,74 et P<0,001). Des tendances similaires à la hausse ont également été observées dans l'acceptation de la planification familiale après avortement (ꭓ2=22,27, P<0,001). CONCLUSION: Le projet de Programme de bénévoles obstétriciens semble avoir amélioré les services de PAC, en particulier l'évacuation médicale et l'acceptation de la planification familiale dans les PHC des camps de PDI et des communautés d'accueil à Maiduguri, dans l'État de Borno, au Nigéria. Nous recommandons de déléguer les services de PAC et une supervision de soutien périodique pour garantir la qualité des soins. MOTS-CLÉS: Communauté d'accueil, Camps de PDI, Aspiration manuelle sous vide, Évacuation médicale, Misoprostol, Soins après avortement.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo , Atención Primaria de Salud , Voluntarios , Humanos , Femenino , Nigeria , Embarazo , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Estudios Longitudinales , Adulto , Obstetricia/métodos , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Aborto Inducido/tendencias , Adulto Joven , Obstetras
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 229(1): 41.e1-41.e10, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37003363

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early pregnancy loss is a common medical problem, and the recommended treatments overlap with those used for induced abortions. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends the incorporation of clinical and patient factors when applying conservative published imaging guidelines to determine the timing of intervention for early pregnancy loss. However, in places where abortion is heavily regulated, clinicians who manage early pregnancy loss may cautiously rely on the strictest criteria to differentiate between early pregnancy loss and a potentially viable pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also notes that specific treatment modalities that are frequently used to induce abortion, including the use of mifepristone in medical therapy and surgical aspiration in an office setting, are cost-effective and beneficial for patients with early pregnancy loss. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine how US-based obstetrics and gynecology residency training institutions adhere to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendations for early pregnancy loss management, including the timing and types of interventions, and to evaluate the relationship with institutional and state abortion restrictions. STUDY DESIGN: From November 2021 to January 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional study of all 296 US-based obstetrics and gynecology residency programs by emailing them and requesting that a faculty member complete a survey about early pregnancy loss practices at their institution. We asked about location of diagnosis, use of imaging guidelines before offering intervention, treatment options available at their institution, and program and personal characteristics. We used chi-square tests and logistic regressions to compare the availability of early pregnancy loss care based on institutional indication-based abortion restrictions and state legislative hostility to abortion care. RESULTS: Of the 149 programs that responded (50.3% response rate), 74 (49.7%) reported that they did not offer any intervention for suspected early pregnancy loss unless rigid imaging criteria were met, whereas the remaining 75 (50.3%) programs reported that they incorporated imaging guidelines with other factors. In an unadjusted analysis, programs were less likely to incorporate other factors with imaging criteria if they were in a state with legislative policies that were hostile toward abortion (33% vs 79%; P<.001) or if the institution restricted abortion by indication (27% vs 88%; P<.001). Mifepristone was used less often in programs located in hostile states (32% vs 75%; P<.001) or in institutions with abortion restrictions (25% vs 86%; P<.001). Similarly, office-based suction aspiration use was lower in hostile states (48% vs 68%; P=.014) and in institutions with restrictions (40% vs 81%; P<.001). After controlling for program characteristics, including state policies and affiliation with family planning training programs or religious entities, institutional abortion restrictions were the only significant predictor of rigid reliance on imaging guidelines (odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-47.9). CONCLUSION: In training institutions that restrict access to induced abortion based on indication for care, residency programs are less likely to holistically incorporate clinical evidence and patient priorities in determining when to intervene in early pregnancy loss as recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Programs in restrictive institutional and state environments are also less likely to offer the full range of early pregnancy loss treatment options. With state abortion bans proliferating nationwide, evidence-based education and patient-centered care for early pregnancy loss may also be hindered.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Aborto Espontáneo , Ginecología , Internado y Residencia , Obstetricia , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Obstetricia/educación , Ginecología/educación , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Mifepristona/uso terapéutico , Aborto Inducido/educación , Atención Dirigida al Paciente
3.
Emerg Med J ; 40(4): 242-247, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36868812

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients experiencing early pregnancy loss often first present to the emergency department (ED) where they can be managed non-operatively through expectant or medical management, or surgically by the obstetrical team. Studies have reported that physician gender can influence clinical decision making, but there is limited research on this phenomenon in the ED. The objective of this study was to determine whether emergency physician gender is associated with early pregnancy loss management. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from patients who presented to Calgary EDs with a non-viable pregnancy from 2014 to 2019. Pregnancies >12 weeks gestational age were excluded. The emergency physicians included saw at least 15 cases of pregnancy loss over the study period. The primary outcome was obstetrical consult rates by male versus female emergency physicians. Secondary outcomes included rates of initial surgical evacuation via dilation and curettage (D&C) procedures, ED returns, returns to care for D&Cs and total D&C rates. Data were analysed using χ2, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression models accounted for physician age, years of practice, training programme and type of pregnancy loss. RESULTS: 98 emergency physicians and 2630 patients from 4 ED sites were included. 76.5% of the physicians were male accounting for 80.4% of pregnancy loss patients. Patients seen by female physicians were more likely to receive an obstetrical consultation (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.50, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.83) and initial surgical management (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.69). ED return rates and total D&C rates were not associated with physician gender. CONCLUSION: Patients seen by female emergency physicians had higher rates of obstetrical consultation and initial operative management compared with those seen by male emergency physicians, but outcomes were similar. Additional research is required to determine why these gender differences exist and how these discrepancies may impact the care of early pregnancy loss patients.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo , Médicos , Embarazo , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
4.
BMC Immunol ; 23(1): 32, 2022 06 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35725392

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Impaired spermatozoa immunogenicity can result in pregnancy complications such as recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA). Given that spermatozoa contact with microbiota, it is possible that inappropriate microbiota composition in the reproductive tract could result in the alteration of spermatozoa antigenicity. Probiotics, as a representative of microbiota, may therefore have a beneficial effect on this altered immunogenicity. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of probiotics on spermatozoa immunogenicity. METHODS: Twenty-five fertile couples and twenty-five RSA couples were included in this study. Spermatozoa were purified and treated with probiotics. Untreated and probiotic treated spermatozoa were evaluated for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I & II expression by flow cytometry. Untreated and probiotic treated spermatozoa were also cocultured with the wife's peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) for 12 days. Then, the supernatant was assessed for IgG and APCA by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay respectively. RESULTS: Probiotic treatment of spermatozoa leads to an increase of HLA class I & II expression in both the fertile and RSA groups. The probiotic treatment resulted in a decrease in both IgG and APCA in the fertile group, but an increase in both IgG and APCA in the RSA group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that a supplementary probiotic treatment may be useful in couples suffering from RSA with an immunologic cause, because it improves disturbed HLA expression on spermatozoa and improves disturbed APCA and IgG production in the presence of spermatozoa.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Habitual , Aborto Espontáneo , Probióticos , Espermatozoides , Aborto Habitual/terapia , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Femenino , Antígenos HLA/metabolismo , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/metabolismo , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/metabolismo , Leucocitos Mononucleares , Masculino , Embarazo , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Espermatozoides/inmunología
5.
Lancet ; 397(10285): 1668-1674, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33915095

RESUMEN

The physical and psychological effect of miscarriage is commonly underappreciated. The journey from diagnosis of miscarriage, through clinical management, to supportive aftercare can be challenging for women, their partners, and caregivers. Diagnostic challenges can lead to delayed or ineffective care and increased anxiety. Inaccurate diagnosis of a miscarriage can result in the unintended termination of a wanted pregnancy. Uncertainty about the therapeutic effects of interventions can lead to suboptimal care, with variations across facilities and countries. For this Series paper, we have developed recommendations for practice from a literature review, appraisal of guidelines, and expert group discussions. The recommendations are grouped into three categories: (1) diagnosis of miscarriage, (2) prevention of miscarriage in women with early pregnancy bleeding, and (3) management of miscarriage. We recommend that every country reports annual aggregate miscarriage data, similarly to the reporting of stillbirth. Early pregnancy services need to focus on providing an effective ultrasound service, as it is central to the diagnosis of miscarriage, and be able to provide expectant management of miscarriage, medical management with mifepristone and misoprostol, and surgical management with manual vacuum aspiration. Women with the dual risk factors of early pregnancy bleeding and a history of previous miscarriage can be recommended vaginal micronised progesterone to improve the prospects of livebirth. We urge health-care funders and providers to invest in early pregnancy care, with specific focus on training for clinical nurse specialists and doctors to provide comprehensive miscarriage care within the setting of dedicated early pregnancy units.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/diagnóstico , Aborto Espontáneo/prevención & control , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Ultrasonografía
6.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol ; 20(1): 27, 2022 Feb 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35120557

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) usually affects young women of childbearing age. After treatment for GTD, 86% of women wish to achieve pregnancy. On account of the impacts of GTD and treatments as well as patient anxiety, large numbers of couples turn to assisted reproductive technology (ART), especially in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). But few studies have investigated whether a history of GTD affects the outcomes of IVF/ICSI in secondary infertile patients and how it occurs. We investigate whether a history of GTD affects the IVF/ICSI outcomes and the live birth rates in women with secondary infertility. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 176 women with secondary infertility who underwent IVF/ICSI treatment at the reproductive medical center of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. Participants were divided into the GTD group (44 women with GTD history) and control group (132 women without GTD history matched from 8318 secondary infertile women). The control group and the study group were matched at a ratio of 3:1 according to patient age, infertility duration, number of cycles and body mass index (BMI). We assessed retrieved oocytes and high-grade embryos, biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, gestational age at delivery, delivery mode and live birth rates. RESULT(S): We found a significantly reduced live-birth rate (34.1% vs 66.7%) associated with IVF/ICSI cycles in patients with a GTD history compared to those without a GTD history. The biochemical pregnancy and miscarriage rates of the GTD group were slightly higher than those of the control group. In addition, there was a difference in gestational age at delivery between the GTD and control groups (p < 0.001) but no differences in the mode of delivery (p = 0.267). Furthermore, the number of abandoned embryos in the GTD group was greater than that in the control group (p = 0.018), and the number of good-quality embryos was less than that in the control group (p = 0.019). The endometrial thickness was thinner (p < 0.001) in the GTD group. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed abnormal endometrial receptivity in the GTD group. CONCLUSION(S): The GTD history of patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles had an impact on the live-birth rate and gestational age at delivery, which might result from the thinner endometrium and abnormal endometrial receptivity before embryo transfer.


Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Enfermedad Trofoblástica Gestacional/epidemiología , Enfermedad Trofoblástica Gestacional/terapia , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Índice de Embarazo , Aborto Espontáneo/diagnóstico , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Aborto Espontáneo/etiología , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Adulto , Tasa de Natalidad , China/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Enfermedad Trofoblástica Gestacional/complicaciones , Enfermedad Trofoblástica Gestacional/diagnóstico , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Infertilidad Femenina/diagnóstico , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Masculino , Embarazo , Pronóstico , Historia Reproductiva , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 33(11): 1313-1320, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35868595

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of temporary proximal uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of highly vascularized retained products of conception (RPOCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included women who underwent treatment for vaginal bleeding after abortion, miscarriage, or delivery, with highly vascularized RPOCs detected by Doppler ultrasound (US) (ie, presence of an enhanced myometrial vascularity, a low resistance index of <0.5, and a peak systolic velocity of ≥0.7 m/s). A unilateral or bilateral embolization with torpedoes of gelatin foam was performed. From November 2017 to January 2021, 24 women with a median age of 30 years (interquartile range, 26.0-34.5 years) with symptomatic highly vascularized RPOCs were included. Clinical success was defined as bleeding arrest between the UAE and 1-month follow-up. Technical success was defined as the complete obstruction of at least 1 uterine artery supplying vascular abnormalities. The safety of the procedure according to the classification of the Society of Interventional Radiology and evolution of lesions on US were also reported. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all 24 (100%) patients, with bilateral arterial embolization in 19 (79%) patients and unilateral embolization in 5 (21%) patients. Clinical success was achieved in all 24 (100%) patients. Five patients still had uterine retention at the 1-month follow-up, including 2 patients with highly vascularized RPOCs. Two patients benefited from hysteroscopy, and 3 had noninvasive management. Four minor adverse events were reported (1 patient had infectious endometritis and 3 patients had a postembolization syndrome). CONCLUSIONS: Proximal UAE with torpedoes of gelatin foam is safe and effective for the management of symptomatic highly vascularized RPOCs.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina , Neoplasias Uterinas , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina/efectos adversos , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gelatina/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Uterina/terapia , Arteria Uterina/diagnóstico por imagen , Aborto Espontáneo/etiología , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia
8.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 59(1): 100-106, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34523740

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reproductive outcome after early miscarriage between women managed expectantly and those treated with vaginal misoprostol. METHODS: This study was a planned secondary analysis of data collected prospectively in a randomized controlled trial comparing expectant management with vaginal misoprostol treatment (single dose of 800 µg) in women with early embryonic or anembryonic miscarriage and vaginal bleeding. The outcome measures were the number of women with a clinical pregnancy conceived within 14 months after complete miscarriage and the outcome of these pregnancies in terms of live birth, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and legal termination of pregnancy. The participants replied to a questionnaire sent by post covering their reproductive history ≤ 14 months after the index miscarriage was complete. Supplementary information and data for women who did not return their questionnaire were retrieved from medical records. RESULTS: Of 94 women randomized to misoprostol treatment and 95 allocated to expectant management, 94 and 90 women, respectively, were included for analysis. Information on reproductive outcome was available for 89/94 (95%) and 83/90 (92%) women, respectively. Complete miscarriage without surgical evacuation was achieved within 31 days in 85% (76/89) of the women in the misoprostol group and in 65% (54/83) of those managed expectantly. The proportion of women treated with surgical evacuation was 33% (27/83) in the expectant-management group vs 12% (11/89) in the misoprostol group. At 14 months after the index miscarriage was complete, 75% (67/89) of women treated with misoprostol and 75% (62/83) of those managed expectantly had achieved at least one clinical pregnancy, while 40% (36/89) and 35% (29/83), respectively, had had at least one live birth (mean difference, 5.5% (95% CI, -9.7 to 20.3%)). When considering the outcome of all pregnancies conceived within 14 months after the index miscarriage was complete, 63% (56/89) of women in the misoprostol group and 55% (46/83) of those in the expectant-management group delivered a live baby after a pregnancy (mean difference, 7.5% (95% CI, -7.9 to 22.4%)). CONCLUSION: Women with early miscarriage can be reassured that fertility is similar after misoprostol treatment and expectant management. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Reproducción , Hemorragia Uterina/terapia , Espera Vigilante/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Intravaginal , Adulto , Intervalo entre Nacimientos , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Historia Reproductiva , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 101(11): 1245-1252, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36056916

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite the high prevalence of miscarriages, they are not systematically registered and few epidemiological studies have been done. As Finnish health registries are comprehensive and widely used in research, we validated the Finnish register data concerning diagnostics and treatment of miscarriage, and treatment-related adverse events. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a validation study regarding miscarriage-related codes of diagnoses and surgical procedures in a Finnish National Hospital Discharge Registry (NHDR) by comparing the information from the NHDR with that of the hospital records. We selected a random sample of 4 months during 1998-2016 from three hospitals, comprising 687 women aged 15-49 experiencing a first miscarriage during follow-up. Women with diagnoses unrelated to miscarriage, or proven to be other than miscarriage, were excluded. The final sample consisted of 643 women with confirmed miscarriage, which was used for analyses regarding the diagnosis, treatment and adverse events of miscarriage treatment. RESULTS: The majority of miscarriages registered in the NHDR were confirmed by the hospital records (positive predictive value [PPV] = 93.6% [95% confidence interval [CI] 91.8%-95.4%]). Different types of miscarriage were also reliably identified; spontaneous abortion with PPV = 85.6% (95% CI 80.9%-89.2%), missed abortion with PPV = 92.7% (95% CI 88.8%-95.3%) and blighted ovum with PPV = 91.1% (95% CI 84.3%-95.1%). The PPV of surgical treatment (62.2% [95% CI 55.7%-68.3%]) was lower than the PPV of non-surgical treatment (93.3% [95% CI 90.5%-95.3%]). The diagnoses regarding adverse events of miscarriage treatment could be reliably identified. The PPV for clinical infections was 76.0% (95% CI 56.6%-88.5%) and for retained products of conception or/and vaginal bleeding 96.8% (95% CI 83.8%-99.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The coverage of the NHDR was good concerning identification of miscarriages, different types of miscarriages and non-surgical treatment. Nevertheless, there is a need for clearly defined procedural codes concerning to medical treatment of miscarriage. The register-based data are reliable and practicable for both clinical evaluation and research concerning miscarriage.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Aborto Retenido , Aborto Espontáneo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Finlandia/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud
10.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 44(6): 644-649, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35248776

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Manual uterine aspiration (MUA) is a currently underused management option for early pregnancy loss (EPL) in the emergency department (ED). This study addresses the safety and efficiency of MUA in the ED. METHODS: We performed a single-site retrospective observational chart review of pregnant women presenting to the ED with vaginal bleeding and ED pathology submissions for products of conception (POC) between 2012 and 2016. Patients were excluded for gestational age >14 weeks, no evidence of pregnancy loss, uterine cavity anomaly, hemodynamic instability, or hemoglobin <80 g/L. We compared the frequencies of complications (need for blood transfusion, repeat ED visit, failed initial management, admission to hospital) and ED utilization time between 4 management options: expectant, misoprostol, MUA, and electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) outside the ED, as well as time to procedure between MUA and EVA. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were included with 123 (76%) having a pathology report positive for POC. The mean patient and gestational ages were 30 ± 7 years and 66 ± 17 days, respectively. One hundred nine patients were managed expectantly, 9 were given misoprostol, 23 underwent MUA, and 21 underwent EVA. Composite complication rates were 40%, 33%, 9%, and 10% (P = 0.001), and mean ED times were 5.4, 4.9, 7.3, and 6.0 hours (P = 0.01), for expectant, misoprostol, MUA, and EVA, respectively. The mean time to procedure was 5.1 hours for MUA and 23.1 hours for EVA (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating MUA in the ED has the potential to reduce health care resource utilization while improving patient care.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo , Legrado por Aspiración , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Misoprostol/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Legrado por Aspiración/métodos , Adulto Joven
11.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 48(12): 3137-3151, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36104948

RESUMEN

AIMS: Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings on the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy in women with implantation failure. The objective of this review was to evaluate whether PRP administration could improve pregnancy outcomes in women with implantation failure undergoing in vitro fertilization. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for studies that explored the effects of PRP for patients with implantation failure. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Based on the available data, we performed subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Eight studies were included. PRP treatment improved pregnancy outcomes for all women compared with no treatment or placebo (clinical pregnancy rate: OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.41-3.54; live birth rate: OR 5.76, 95% CI 1.55-21.44; miscarriage rate: OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.63), especially in randomized controlled trials. No significant differences were detected in multiple pregnancy rates (OR 2.54, 95% CI 0.67-9.67). Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on the number of previous implantation failures showed that PRP treatment improved pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent implantation failure (clinical pregnancy rate: OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.49-4.38; live birth rate: OR 5.07, 95% CI 1.15-22.34; miscarriage rate: OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.78). CONCLUSION: PRP administration could improve pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent implantation failure. Due to the limited evidence available, the efficacy of PRP in women with recurrent implantation failure needs to be further verified in high-quality studies with larger sample sizes.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Resultado del Embarazo , Nacimiento Vivo , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Índice de Embarazo , Fertilización In Vitro , Perfusión , Implantación del Embrión
12.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol ; 19(1): 93, 2021 Jun 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34158067

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endometrial thickness (ET) has previously been shown to positively correlate with implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. Pregnancies achieved using in-vitro fertilization (IVF) technique are prone to higher rates of early miscarriage. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of expectant management, medical treatment (Misoprostol) and dilation and curettage (D&C) for early miscarriage following IVF cycles on the subsequent cycle outcomes - endometrial thickness and reproductive outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women who underwent embryo transfer, conceived and had first trimester miscarriage with at least one subsequent embryo transfer. ET measurements during fresh or frozen-thawed IVF cycles were assessed for each patient. Comparisons of ET differences between the miscarriage and the subsequent cycles, as well as reproductive outcomes, were performed according to the initial miscarriage management approach. RESULTS: A total of 223 women were included in the study. Seventy-eight women were managed conservatively, 61 were treated with Misoprostol and 84 women underwent D&C. Management by D&C, compared to conservative management and Misoprostol treatment was associated with higher prevalence of a significant (> 2 mm) ET decrease (29.8%% vs. 14.1and 6.6%, respectively; p < .001) and was the only approach associated with a significant increase in the rates of ET under 7 and 8 mm in the following cycle (p = 0.006 and 0.035; respectively). Clinical pregnancy rates were significantly lower following D&C compared with conservative management and Misoprostol (16.7% vs. 38.5 and 27.9%, respectively; p = 0.008) as well as implantation rate (11.1% vs. 30.5.% and 17.7, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that D&C management of a miscarriage is associated with decreased ET and higher rates of thin endometrium in the subsequent IVF cycle, compared with conservative management and Misoprostol treatment. In addition, implantation and pregnancy rates were significantly lower after D&C.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Dilatación y Legrado Uterino/métodos , Endometrio/diagnóstico por imagen , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Endometrio/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tamaño de los Órganos , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol ; 19(1): 152, 2021 Oct 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34615544

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There are two major management approach for cornual heterotopic pregnancy, transvaginal cornual embryo reduction with ultrasound guidance, or laparoscopic cornual resection. This no consensus on the optimal management for cornual heterotopic pregnancy. Here, we are trying to determine the optimal management approach for patients with viable cornual heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at the locally largest reproductive center of a tertiary hospital. A total of 14 women diagnosed as viable cornual heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer. Six patients were treated with cornual pregnancy reduction under transvaginal ultrasound guidance without the use of feticide drug (treatment 1), and eight patients were treated with laparoscopic cornual pregnancy resection (treatment 2). RESULTS: All 14 patients of cornual heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer due to fallopian tubal factor, among which, 12 patients had cornual pregnancy occurred in the ipsilateral uterine horn of tubal pathological conditions. Nine (64.29%) showed a history of ectopic pregnancy. Thirteen (92.86%) patients were transferred with two embryos and only one patient had single embryo transferred. Six patients received treatment 1, and 2 (33.33%) had uterine horn rupture and massive bleeding which required emergency laparoscopic surgery for homostasis. No cornual rupture occurred among patients received treatment 2. Each treatment group had one case of spontaneous miscarriage. The remaining 5 cases in treatment 1 group and the remaining 7 cases in treatment 2 group delivered healthy live offspring. CONCLUSION: Patients with tubal factors attempting for embryo transfer, especially those aiming for multiple embryos transfer, should be informed with risk of cornual heterotopic pregnancy and the subsequent cornual rupture. Compared with cornual pregnancy reduction under transvaginal ultrasound guidance, laparoscopic cornual resection might be a favorable approach for patients with viable cornual heterotopic pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Embrión/efectos adversos , Reducción de Embarazo Multifetal , Embarazo Cornual/cirugía , Embarazo Heterotópico/cirugía , Abortivos/uso terapéutico , Aborto Espontáneo/etiología , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Adulto , China , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Embarazo , Reducción de Embarazo Multifetal/métodos , Embarazo Cornual/diagnóstico , Embarazo Cornual/etiología , Embarazo Heterotópico/diagnóstico , Embarazo Heterotópico/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
14.
CMAJ ; 193(21): E753-E760, 2021 05 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34035055

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reduced use of the emergency department during the COVID-19 pandemic may result in increased disease acuity when patients do seek health care services. We sought to evaluate emergency department visits for common abdominal and gynecologic conditions before and at the beginning of the pandemic to determine whether changes in emergency department attendance had serious consequences for patients. METHODS: We conducted a population-based analysis using administrative data to evaluate the weekly rate of emergency department visits pre-COVID-19 (Jan. 1-Mar. 10, 2020) and during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (Mar. 11-June 30, 2020), compared with a historical control period (Jan. 1-July 1, 2019). All residents of Ontario, Canada, presenting to the emergency department with appendicitis, cholecystitis, ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage were included. We evaluated weekly incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of emergency department visits, management strategies and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Across all study periods, 39 691 emergency department visits met inclusion criteria (40.2 % appendicitis, 32.1% miscarriage, 21.3% cholecystitis, 6.4% ectopic pregnancy). Baseline characteristics of patients presenting to the emergency department did not vary across study periods. After an initial reduction in emergency department visits, presentations for cholecystitis and ectopic pregnancy quickly returned to expected levels. However, presentations for appendicitis and miscarriage showed sustained reductions (IRR 0.61-0.80), with 1087 and 984 fewer visits, respectively, after the start of the pandemic, relative to 2019. Management strategies, complications and mortality rates were similar across study periods for all conditions. INTERPRETATION: Although our study showed evidence of emergency department avoidance in Ontario during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, no adverse consequences were evident. Emergency care and outcomes for patients were similar before and during the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , COVID-19 , Colecistitis , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/tendencias , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aborto Espontáneo/diagnóstico , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Apendicitis/terapia , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Colecistitis/diagnóstico , Colecistitis/epidemiología , Colecistitis/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Pandemias , Embarazo , Embarazo Ectópico/diagnóstico , Embarazo Ectópico/epidemiología , Embarazo Ectópico/terapia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
15.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 58(5): 757-765, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33798287

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the short- and long-term emotional distress (grief, anxiety and depressive symptoms) after early miscarriage and satisfaction with treatment between women randomized to expectant management vs vaginal misoprostol treatment. METHODS: This was a preplanned analysis of data collected during a randomized controlled trial comparing expectant management with misoprostol treatment in women with early anembryonic or embryonic miscarriage and vaginal bleeding. If the miscarriage was not complete on day 31 after inclusion, surgical evacuation was recommended. The main outcomes were levels of anxiety and grief, depressive symptoms and client satisfaction with the treatment, which were assessed using the following validated psychometric self-assessment instruments: Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI, Form Y), Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S; self-reported version) and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). All women were assessed at four timepoints: on the day of randomization, on the day when the miscarriage was judged to be complete, and at 3 months and 14 months after complete miscarriage. The psychometric and client satisfaction scores were compared between the misoprostol group and the expectant-management group at each assessment. Analysis was performed by the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Ninety women were randomized to expectant management and 94 to misoprostol treatment. The psychometric and client satisfaction scores were similar in the two treatment groups at all assessment timepoints. At inclusion, 41% (35/86) of the women managed expectantly and 37% (34/92) of those treated with misoprostol had a STAI-state score of > 46 ('high level of anxiety'), and 9% (8/86) and 10% (9/91), respectively, had symptoms of moderate or severe depression (MADRS-S score ≥ 20). In both treatment groups, symptom scores for anxiety and depression were significantly higher at inclusion than after treatment and remained low until 14 months after complete miscarriage. Grief reactions were mild in both groups, with a median PGS score of 40.0 at 3 months and 37.0 at 14 months after complete miscarriage in both treatment groups. Four women treated with misoprostol and two women managed expectantly had a PGS score of > 90 (indicating deep grief) 3 months after complete miscarriage, while one woman managed expectantly had a PGS score of > 90 14 months after complete miscarriage. Women in both treatment groups were satisfied with their management, as indicated by a median CSQ-8 score of > 25 at each assessment. More than 85% of participants in each of the two groups reported that they would recommend the treatment they received to a friend. CONCLUSIONS: The psychological response to and recovery after early miscarriage did not differ between women treated with misoprostol and those managed expectantly. Satisfaction with treatment was high in both treatment groups. Our findings support patient involvement when deciding on the management of early miscarriage. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/psicología , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Espera Vigilante/estadística & datos numéricos , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Administración Intravaginal , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Distrés Psicológico , Psicometría
16.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 6: CD012602, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34061352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Miscarriage, defined as the spontaneous loss of a pregnancy before 24 weeks' gestation, is common with approximately 25% of women experiencing a miscarriage in their lifetime. An estimated 15% of pregnancies end in miscarriage. Miscarriage can lead to serious morbidity, including haemorrhage, infection, and even death, particularly in settings without adequate healthcare provision. Early miscarriages occur during the first 14 weeks of pregnancy, and can be managed expectantly, medically or surgically. However, there is uncertainty about the relative effectiveness and risks of each option. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the relative effectiveness and safety profiles for the different management methods for early miscarriage, and to provide rankings of the available methods according to their effectiveness, safety, and side-effect profile using a network meta-analysis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (9 February 2021), ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (12 February 2021), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness or safety of methods for miscarriage management. Early miscarriage was defined as less than or equal to 14 weeks of gestation, and included missed and incomplete miscarriage. Management of late miscarriages after 14 weeks of gestation (often referred to as intrauterine fetal deaths) was not eligible for inclusion in the review. Cluster- and quasi-randomised trials were eligible for inclusion. Randomised trials published only as abstracts were eligible if sufficient information could be retrieved. We excluded non-randomised trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least three review authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We estimated the relative effects and rankings for the primary outcomes of complete miscarriage and composite outcome of death or serious complications. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Relative effects for the primary outcomes are reported subgrouped by the type of miscarriage (incomplete and missed miscarriage). We also performed pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analysis to determine the relative effects and rankings of all available methods. MAIN RESULTS: Our network meta-analysis included 78 randomised trials involving 17,795 women from 37 countries. Most trials (71/78) were conducted in hospital settings and included women with missed or incomplete miscarriage. Across 158 trial arms, the following methods were used: 51 trial arms (33%) used misoprostol; 50 (32%) used suction aspiration; 26 (16%) used expectant management or placebo; 17 (11%) used dilatation and curettage; 11 (6%) used mifepristone plus misoprostol; and three (2%) used suction aspiration plus cervical preparation. Of these 78 studies, 71 (90%) contributed data in a usable form for meta-analysis. Complete miscarriage Based on the relative effects from the network meta-analysis of 59 trials (12,591 women), we found that five methods may be more effective than expectant management or placebo for achieving a complete miscarriage: · suction aspiration after cervical preparation (risk ratio (RR) 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41 to 3.20, low-certainty evidence), · dilatation and curettage (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.75, low-certainty evidence), · suction aspiration (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.62, low-certainty evidence), · mifepristone plus misoprostol (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.66, moderate-certainty evidence), · misoprostol (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.46, low-certainty evidence). The highest ranked surgical method was suction aspiration after cervical preparation. The highest ranked non-surgical treatment was mifepristone plus misoprostol. All surgical methods were ranked higher than medical methods, which in turn ranked above expectant management or placebo. Composite outcome of death and serious complications Based on the relative effects from the network meta-analysis of 35 trials (8161 women), we found that four methods with available data were compatible with a wide range of treatment effects compared with expectant management or placebo: · dilatation and curettage (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.06, low-certainty evidence), · suction aspiration (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.32, low-certainty evidence), · misoprostol (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.15, low-certainty evidence), · mifepristone plus misoprostol (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.84, low-certainty evidence). Importantly, no deaths were reported in these studies, thus this composite outcome was entirely composed of serious complications, including blood transfusions, uterine perforations, hysterectomies, and intensive care unit admissions. Expectant management and placebo ranked the lowest when compared with alternative treatment interventions. Subgroup analyses by type of miscarriage (missed or incomplete) agreed with the overall analysis in that surgical methods were the most effective treatment, followed by medical methods and then expectant management or placebo, but there are possible subgroup differences in the effectiveness of the available methods.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on relative effects from the network meta-analysis, all surgical and medical methods for managing a miscarriage may be more effective than expectant management or placebo. Surgical methods were ranked highest for managing a miscarriage, followed by medical methods, which in turn ranked above expectant management or placebo. Expectant management or placebo had the highest chance of serious complications, including the need for unplanned or emergency surgery. A subgroup analysis showed that surgical and medical methods may be more beneficial in women with missed miscarriage compared to women with incomplete miscarriage. Since type of miscarriage (missed and incomplete) appears to be a source of inconsistency and heterogeneity within these data, we acknowledge that the main network meta-analysis may be unreliable. However, we plan to explore this further in future updates and consider the primary analysis as separate networks for missed and incomplete miscarriage.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Aborto Incompleto/terapia , Aborto Retenido/terapia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Mifepristona/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Metaanálisis en Red , Oxitócicos/administración & dosificación , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Succión/estadística & datos numéricos , Legrado por Aspiración/estadística & datos numéricos , Espera Vigilante/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Clin Immunol ; 210: 108261, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31689518

RESUMEN

Foxp3+ T regulatory cell (Tregs) are central in the pathobiology of recurrent spontaneous abortions (RSA). Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins instruct Treg differentiation and polarization, but the STAT signaling architecture of Tregs in RSA and its modifications by lymphocyte immunotherapy (LIT) are yet unknown. By using single-cell phospho-specific flow cytometry we show that the STAT signaling biosignature of Tregs in women with RSA was characterized by marked downregulation of the IFNα/pSTAT1&5, IL-6/pSTAT1&3 and IL-2/pSTAT5 signaling nodes compared to age-matched fertile females. LIT partially restored all of these signaling axes in Tregs only in women who achieved pregnancy after treatment. Both the pretreatment biosignature of Tregs and its modulations by LIT were associated with therapeutic success. We conclude that STAT signaling pathways in Tregs are actively involved in the pathophysiology of RSA and may serve as a predictive tool for selecting patients who may benefit from LIT.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/inmunología , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Linfocitos T Reguladores/inmunología , Aborto Espontáneo/diagnóstico , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Citocinas/metabolismo , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/metabolismo , Humanos , Mediadores de Inflamación/metabolismo , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Factores de Transcripción STAT/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Análisis de la Célula Individual , Linfocitos T Reguladores/trasplante , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 41(4): 707-713, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32819838

RESUMEN

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does long-term reproductive outcome after early pregnancy loss (EPL) differ between women who are treated with misoprostol and surgical aspiration. DESIGN: A historic cohort study of all women who were diagnosed with early pregnancy loss (≤12 weeks), in a single medical centre, between September 2016 and August 2017, was conducted. The women were treated with either misoprostol or surgical aspiration according to their own preferences. Women who were lost to follow-up or did not attempt to conceive again were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative pregnancy rate within 12 months from intervention. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between women who received misoprostol (n = 163) and women who underwent surgical aspiration (n = 122). Women who received misoprostol had a higher rate of interventions for retained products of conception (11.0% versus 3.3%, respectively; P = 0.015). The misoprostol and the surgical aspiration groups did not differ in rate of repeated miscarriages (17.8% versus 21.3%, respectively; P = 0.45), or pregnancy rate within 6 months (58.3% versus 50.0%, respectively; P = 0.16), 12 months (78.5% versus 78.7%, respectively; P = 0.97) and 24 months (92.0% versus 91.8%, respectively; P = 0.94). Live birth rate within 24 months was comparable (62.0% versus 58.2%, respectively; P = 0.52), as well as gestational age at birth (38.5 versus 38.6 weeks, respectively; P = 0.81) and birthweight (3295 versus 3161 g, respectively; P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term reproductive outcomes are comparable in women with EPL who are treated with either misoprostol or surgical aspiration. Our findings may help counselling patients facing EPL who have concerns about their future reproduction.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Misoprostol/uso terapéutico , Paracentesis , Reproducción/fisiología , Aborto Espontáneo/tratamiento farmacológico , Aborto Espontáneo/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 222(4): 306-319.e18, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31394069

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The management of the pregnancy after delivery of the first fetus during a second-trimester miscarriage or very early preterm birth has not been well defined. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate whether delayed interval delivery of the remaining fetus(es) in twins/triplets is associated with improved survival, when compared with immediate delivery, after miscarriage or very preterm birth of the first fetus in multiple pregnancy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched through January 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STUDY DESIGN, POPULATIONS, AND INTERVENTIONS): The following eligibility criteria applied: full-text original article; included at least 5 cases of delayed interval delivery for remaining fetus(es); and reported the survival rate of the first-born and the remaining fetus(es). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: K.W.C. and W.W. searched, screened, and reviewed the articles. The quality of the studies was assessed according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist. If possible, data were stratified for assigned chorionicity. Effect sizes were pooled through a meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2295 published article and abstracts were identified. Only 16 studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of 492 pregnancies (432 twins [88%], 56 triplets [11%], 3 quadruplets and 1 quintuplets) showed that delayed interval delivery significantly improved the perinatal survival of remaining fetus(es) compared with the first born (odds ratio, 5.22, 95% confidence interval, 2.95-9.25, I2 = 53%), before 20+0 weeks (odds ratio, 6.32, 95% confidence interval, 1.99-20.13, I2 = 0%), between 20+0 and 23+6 weeks (odds ratio, 3.31, 95% confidence interval, 1.95-5.63, I2 = 0%), and after 24+0 weeks (odds ratio, 1.92, 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.05, I2 = 0%), in dichorionic twin pregnancy (odds ratio, 14.89, 95% confidence interval, 6.19-35.84, I2 = 0%), and unselected triplet pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.33, 95% confidence interval, 1.02-5.32, I2 = 0%. ). Among the survivors, there were no significant differences in the short-term and long-term neonatal morbidities between the first-born and the remaining fetus(es). Serious maternal morbidity was reported in 39% of pregnancy after delayed interval delivery (71 of 183). In addition, 2 cases were managed by postpartum hysterectomy and 1 reported postoperative uterovaginal fistula. There were no recorded cases of maternal mortality. CONCLUSION: Delayed interval delivery when a fetus has delivered in a multiple pregnancy is an effective management option to increase the survival rate of the remaining fetus(es). About 39% of women may experience morbidity following this management option.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Parto Obstétrico , Embarazo Múltiple , Nacimiento Prematuro/terapia , Aborto Espontáneo/mortalidad , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda