The Anterior Modified San Diego Acetabuloplasty Does Not Increase Superior-Anterior Coverage in Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Models.

BACKGROUND: Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip may require pelvic osteotomies to improve acetabular coverage. The purpose of this study was to compare the changes in acetabular version, tilt, and regional coverage angles following the San Diego acetabuloplasty (SDA), the modified San Diego acetabuloplasty (mSDA), and the Pemberton acetabuloplasty (PA). METHODS: Fourteen patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip and computed tomography (CT) imaging were identified. From CT images, 2 identical pelvises were 3-dimensional-printed for each patient. Bone was printed with rigid material, and cartilage with flexible material. For each model pair, the SDA was performed on one and the PA was performed on the other. CT scans were obtained before and after acetabuloplasties. Next, the bone graft in the SDA model was moved anteriorly, representing the mSDA, and the model was rescanned. Acetabular version, tilt, and coverage angles (posterior, superior-posterior, superior, superior-anterior, and anterior) were calculated. Preoperative to postoperative differences were compared (repeated measures analysis of variance or Wilcoxon signed rank test). The significance was set to P <0.05. RESULTS: The mean age at CT was 5.8±1.2 years (range: 3.9 to 7.5 y). All 3 procedures (SDA, mSDA, and PA) significantly increased acetabular tilt; P <0.045), with a similar change observed for all 3 ( P =0.868). PA was the only procedure to significantly decrease relative acetabular version (6.5±6.5 degrees, preoperative: 12.9±5.3 degrees; P =0.004). Both the SDA and mSDA procedures significantly increased coverage in the superior-posterior octant (SDA: 92.6±9.3 degrees, mSDA: 92.3±9.8 degrees, preoperative: 81.9±9.5 degrees; P <0.02), with a similar percent change among the 2 ( P =1.0). All 3 procedures significantly increased superior coverage ( P <0.04); the increase was similar among the 3 ( P =0.205). The PA was the only procedure to produce a significant increase in coverage in the superior-anterior octant (91.0±16.7 degrees, preoperative: 74.0±12.1 degrees; P =0.005) or the anterior octant (50.7±11.7 degrees, preoperative: 45.8±8.9 degrees; P =0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The SDA and mSDA procedures produced similar postoperative changes, primarily in the superior and superior-posterior acetabular octants. Placing the graft more anteriorly did not increase anterior coverage in the mSDA, and only the PA increased coverage in the superior and superior-anterior acetabular octants.

Twelve to Twenty-year Follow-up of Dega Acetabuloplasty in Patients With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Is it as Effective as Expected?

BACKGROUND: Although Dega acetabuloplasty is widely used for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip, there is a paucity of data on long-term outcomes. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the rate of residual acetabular dysplasia after Dega acetabuloplasty. METHODS: Patients of a previously reported consecutive series of 35 patients (43 hips) operated by a single surgeon were recontacted for long-term follow-up. Of these, 25 patients (32 hips) consented, with a follow-up rate of 71% (74% of hips). The mean age at the time of surgery was 35 (18 to 65) months. The presence of residual dysplasia was noted according to the lateral center-edge angle of Wiberg, femoral head extrusion index, and Tönnis angle. The latest radiographic outcome was evaluated according to the Severin classification and patients were clinically evaluated according to the modified McKay criteria. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration of 16.5 (12 to 20) years yielded an average age of 19.2 (14 to 23) years at the time of analysis. According to lateral center-edge angle, femoral head extrusion index, and Tönnis angle, 5 (15.6%) hips were dysplastic and 2 (6.3%) hips were reoperated for resubluxation. Thus, a total of 7 hips (21.9%) were considered to have residual dysplasia. With the exception of 2 hips that underwent further osteotomies, no other hips were re-subluxated or redislocated. Overcoverage was noted in 6 (18.7%) hips. There were 26 Severin group I and II (81.3%), 4 Severin group III (12.5%), and 2 Severin group IV (6.2%) hips. According to modified McKay criteria, 20 (62.5%) hips were excellent, 7 (21.9%) hips were good, and 5 (15.6%) were fair. Severin classification and modified McKay criteria were correlated with dysplasia ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Seventy-eight percent of the hips treated by Dega acetabuloplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip did not have acetabular dysplasia at a mean follow-up of 16 years. Even in well-treated asymptomatic hips, patients should be followed regularly, especially for residual dysplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Arthroscopic labral repair combined with less invasive open-shelf acetabuloplasty for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Hip arthroscopy has become widely used for intra-articular lesions, such as labral tears and femoral acetabular impingement. However, its use in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been controversial and has historically demonstrated mixed results, as acetabular dysplasia may cause instability due to insufficient bony coverage of the femoral head, thus causing excessive stress on the repaired labrum and cartilage. We devised a combined hip arthroscopic labral repair and a less invasive open-shelf procedure using a small skin incision as an anterolateral portal in hip arthroscopy. This novel procedure may improve the stability of the repaired labrum with a bony covering in a minimally invasive manner. Moreover, the shelf procedure can be performed under direct vision in a comparatively safe and precise manner. In total, 13 hips with DDH underwent the procedure for labral tears. All patients were females, with a mean age of 30 years. The mean follow-up period was 33 months. The mean Harris hip score improved from 74.2 to 93.6, and Oxford Hip score improved from 32.4 to 19.3. According to the Tönnis classification, the grade of arthritis preoperatively was grade 0 for nine hips and grade I for four hips. No radiographic progression of osteoarthritis was observed. It is possible that this novel procedure could be an effective treatment for labral tears with DDH and may prevent the early onset of secondary osteoarthritis. In this technical tip, we describe hip arthroscopic labral repair combined with a less invasive open-shelf acetabuloplasty in further detail.

Influence of shelf acetabuloplasty on the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in hips with dysplasia: a case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young adults, especially in those with hip dysplasia, is affected by wear and acetabular fixation problems. Shelf acetabuloplasty is performed to delay THA in patients with acetabular dysplasia. Thus, we conducted a retrospective, continuous case-control study at a single healthcare facility to analyze (1) the influence of prior shelf acetabuloplasty on the survival of a subsequent THA and (2) the functional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 105 patients (124 THA) who underwent THA due to hip dysplasia: 54 patients (61 THA) were included in the THA post-shelf acetabuloplasty group (case group) and 51 patients (63 THA) in the THA for dysplasia group (control group). RESULTS: At 15 years' follow-up, 89% of patients (95% CI: 84-91%) in the shelf group and 83% (95% CI: 81-90%) in the dysplasia group had not undergone surgical revision. This difference between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.566). The functional outcomes were satisfactory in both groups; however, they were significantly better in the dysplasia group than in the shelf group based on the Merle d'Aubigne and Postel score (16.9 vs 16.0 min-max: 14-18 vs 3-18) (p = 0.01), Harris Hip score (90.0 vs 84.7, min-max: 62-100 vs 22-100) (p = 0.017), and the Oxford-12 (18/60 vs 21/60, min-max: 45-12 vs 51-12) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Shelf acetabuloplasty before THA does not negatively affect THA survivorship. The functional outcomes appear to be better in the hips that did not undergo shelf acetabuloplasty, although the results were good in both groups.

Does Adding Femoral Lengthening at the Time of Rotation Hip Transposition After Periacetabular Tumor Resection Allow for Restoration of Limb Length and Function? Interim Results of a Modified Hip Transposition Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction after pelvic tumor resection of the acetabulum is challenging. Previous methods of hip transposition after acetabular resection have the advantages of reducing wound complications and infections of the allograft or metal endoprosthesis but were associated with substantial limb length discrepancy. We therefore developed a modification of this procedure, rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening, to address limb length, and we wished to evaluate its effectiveness in terms of complications and functional outcomes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this study, we asked: (1) What were the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores after this reconstruction method was used? (2) What complications occurred after this reconstruction method was used? (3) What proportion of patients achieved solid arthrodesis (as opposed to pseudarthrosis) with the sacrum and solid union of the femur? (4) What were the results with respect to limb length after a minimum follow-up of 2 years? METHODS: From 2011 to 2017, 83 patients with an aggressive benign or primary malignant tumor involving the acetabulum were treated in our institution. Of those, 23% (19 of 83) were treated with rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening and were considered for this retrospective study; 15 were available at a minimum follow-up of 2 years (median [range], 49 months [24 to 97 months]), and four died of lung metastases before 2 years. No patients were lost to follow-up before 2 years. During the period in question, the general indications for this approach were primary nonmetastatic malignant bone tumor or a locally aggressive benign bone tumor that could not be treated adequately with curettage. There were seven men and 12 women with a median age of 43 years. Nine patients underwent Zones I + II resection, eight patients had Zones I + II + III resection, and two received Zones II + III resection. After tumor resection, rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening reconstruction was performed, which included two steps. The first step was to lengthen the femur with the insertion of an allograft. Two methods were used to achieve limb lengthening: a "Z" osteotomy and a transverse osteotomy. The second step was to take the hip transposition and rotate the femoral head posteriorly 10° to 20°. The median (range) operative time was 510 minutes (330 to 925 minutes). The median intraoperative blood loss was 4000 mL (1800 to 7000 mL). We performed a chart review on the 15 available patients for clinical and radiographic assessment of functional outcomes and complications. Arthrodesis and leg length discrepancy were evaluated radiographically. RESULTS: The median (range) Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 21 points (17 to 30). Eleven of 19 patients developed procedure-related complications, including six patients with allograft nonunion, two with deep infection, two with delayed skin healing, and one with a hematoma. Two patients had minor additional surgical interventions without the removal of any implants. Local recurrences developed in four patients, and all four died of disease. All seven patients treated with a Z osteotomy had bone union. Among the eight patients with transverse osteotomy, bone union did not occur in six patients. After hip transposition, stable iliofemoral arthrodesis was achieved in seven patients. Pseudarthrosis developed in the remaining eight patients. The median (range) lower limb length discrepancy at the last follow-up visit or death was 8 mm (1 to 42 mm). CONCLUSION: Although complex and challenging, rotation hip transposition after femur lengthening reconstruction with a Z osteotomy provides acceptable functional outcomes with complications that are within expectations for resection of pelvic tumors involving the acetabulum. Because of the magnitude and complexity of this technique, we believe it should be used primarily for patients with a favorable prognosis, both locally and systemically. This innovative procedure may be useful to other surgeons if larger numbers of patients and longer-term follow-up confirm our results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Isolated Acetabuloplasty for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Favorable Patient-Reported Outcomes and Sustained Survivorship at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate minimum 5-year outcomes and conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome with an isolated acetabular osteoplasty. METHODS: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with an isolated acetabular osteoplasty from March 2009 to June 2014 for FAI syndrome with pincer and/or cam morphology and a labral tear were identified. Those who underwent femoroplasty or prior ipsilateral hip surgery or who had previous hip conditions, ipsilateral hip dysplasia, or a Tönnis grade higher than 2 were excluded. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores specific to physical functioning and pain interference, modified Harris Hip Score, International Hip Outcome Tool 12, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Patients were also queried about secondary surgical procedures and conversion to THA. RESULTS: We identified 86 patients at minimum 5-year follow-up (average, 7.4 years). The average patient age was 39.8 ± 12.3 years, 70.9% of patients were female, and 7% of patients had Tönnis grade 2. The mean PRO scores were 52.0 ± 8.9 for the PROMIS physical functioning score, 39.6 ± 7.5 for the PROMIS pain interference score, 78.7 ± 12.0 for the modified Harris Hip Score, 73.3 ± 23.1 for the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 score, 89.9 ± 12.0 for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, and 81.4 ± 21.0 for the Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale. Of the patients, 72.1% achieved the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) according to previously established PASS scores for FAI syndrome treated with hip arthroscopy at minimum 5-year follow-up. The overall rate of revision arthroscopy was 3.5%, and the rate of conversion to THA was 5.8%. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated acetabular osteoplasty can provide sustained clinical benefits for the treatment of FAI syndrome with labral tears, with good to excellent PROs and PASS rates and a low rate of conversion to THA at minimum 5-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Hip arthroscopy with initial access to the peripheral compartment provides significant improvement in FAI patients.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using the technique of initial access to the peripheral compartment. It is based on a single surgeon large case series with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal study with consecutive patients. Inclusion criteria were the presence of FAI syndrome that had failed non-operative treatment and had a hip arthroscopy with initial access to the peripheral compartment. Exclusion criteria were previous hip surgery, patients younger than 16 or older than 60 years, Tönnis grade ≥ 2 osteoarthritis, hip dysplasia based on radiographic evidence of LCEA less than 25° and workers compensation cases. One hundred and sixty hips met the inclusion criteria, 84 were female and 70 were male patients (six bilateral cases), with a median age of 36 years (range 16-59). RESULTS: The median alpha angle correction was 22.6º (range 5.9-46.7) (p < 0.01) and the average LCEA correction when acetabuloplasty was undertaken was 6.5º (range - 1.4-20.8) (p < 0.01). The mean NAHS at baseline was 56.1 (range 16-96) and improved to 83.2 at the last follow up (range 44-100) for the patients that had no additional procedure (p < 0.01). The mean average improvement was 27.7º points (range - 16-73). No iatrogenic labral perforation and no full-thickness chondral damage were recorded during the arthroscopic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Favourable outcomes are reported for the arthroscopic treatment of FAI with initial access to the peripheral compartment. The technique is protective against iatrogenic chondral and labral damage, more conservative to the joint capsule, but the mean traction time was relatively long when suture anchors were used. The results are comparable to the classic initial central compartment approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Indications and Outcomes of Secondary Hip Procedures After Failed Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: (1) To identify present indications for secondary procedures in patients with failed hip arthroscopy and (2) to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of the secondary procedures, including revision arthroscopy, periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), and total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Study groups included patients who had a secondary procedure after failed previous hip arthroscopy whereas the control groups were patients who had a primary procedure but did not require a secondary procedure. Indications and procedures at the time of the secondary operation were documented for each study. Average PROs were recorded, and standardized mean difference was calculated to estimate effect size. RESULTS: Eighteen studies reporting on patients undergoing a secondary procedure after a previous hip arthroscopy were included. The 3 main secondary procedure groups were revision hip arthroscopy, secondary PAO, and secondary THA. Regarding the revision arthroscopy group, the most common indications were labral tears, cam deformity, and pincer deformity. In addition, the most common procedures were femoroplasty, acetabuloplasty, capsular release, and labral reconstruction. The most common indications for the secondary PAO and THA groups were dysplasia and osteoarthritis respectively. Five of the revision arthroscopy studies found that revision patients had worse outcomes than the primary arthroscopy group. One PAO study found that the previous arthroscopy group had slightly worse outcomes, and 2 studies found no differences in PROs. Two THA studies reported worse outcomes for the prior arthroscopy group, and 2 studies reported no differences in outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The most common indications for revision hip arthroscopy were labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement. Patients undergoing a revision hip arthroscopy demonstrated good postoperative outcomes but to an overall lesser extent than their primary counterparts. The secondary PAO and THA groups also had favorable PROs, but the studies were inconclusive in determining superior outcomes between the primary and secondary groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Systematic review of Level II-IV investigations.

Depression and Anxiety Are Associated With Increased Health Care Costs and Opioid Use for Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: Analysis of a Claims Database.

PURPOSE: To determine if opioid use and health care costs in the year before and following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) differ between those with or without depression or anxiety. METHODS: Using the Truven Health Marketscan database, FAI patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between October 2010 and December 2015 were identified (Current Procedural Terminology codes 29914 [femoroplasty], 29915 [acetabuloplasty], and/or 29916 [labral repair]). Patients were excluded if they had incomplete coverage for 1 year either before or following surgery. The number of patients with 1 or more claims related to depression or anxiety during the year before surgery was quantified (International Statistical Classification Diseases and Related Health-9 codes 296, 298, 300, 309, 311). Health care costs in the year before and following hip arthroscopy were compared between those with or without depression or anxiety. We also compared the number of patients in each group who filled a narcotic pain prescription within 180 days before surgery as well as >60 or >90 days after hip arthroscopy. RESULTS: Depression or anxiety claims were seen in 5,208/14,830 patients (35.1%) before surgery. A significantly greater proportion of those with preoperative depression or anxiety filled opioid-related prescriptions in the 6 months before surgery (36.2% vs 25.6%, P < .0001) and both >60 days (31.3% vs 24.7%, P < .0001) and >90 days after surgery (29.5% vs 23.4%, P < .0001). The group with preoperative depression or anxiety had significantly greater health care costs both before ($8,775 vs $5,674, P < .0001) and following surgery ($5,287 vs $3,908, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Both before and following hip arthroscopy, opioid use and health care costs were significantly greater for FAI patients with comorbid depression or anxiety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic study.

Natural history of shelf gap and paleo-acetabular depth after shelf acetabuloplasty for Perthes disease.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the morphologic evolution of the shelf gap, acetabulum and femoral head after shelf acetabuloplasty in patients affected by Perthes disease. 54 patients operated for Perthes disease with shelf acetabuloplasty were retrospectively reviewed regarding the radiographic results. Three pelvic antero-posterior radiographs have been studied for each patient, one at 2 postoperative months, one at 1 postoperative year and one at the latest clinical follow up (mean 76 postoperative months). The shelf gap decreased from 108% at 2 months to 104% at the last follow-up (p<0.001). There was an increase of the total acetabular depth to 168% by the presence of the shelf graft (p<0.001). The acetabular index of the operated side related to the contralateral side was 68% at 2 months due to the effect of the graft (p<0.001). The migration index of the shelf side was in mean -24% at 2 months and -3% at last follow- up (p<0.001). According to the Stulberg classification, there were 9 type 1 (17%), 20 type 2 (37%), 19 type 3 (35%), 5 type 4 (9%) and 1 type 5 (2%). A progressive remodeling with shelf gap reduction was occurring during the following months after the surgery. An increase of the total acetabular depth and a decrease of the migration index without a lateral overgrowth of the paleo-acetabulum was observed. Shelf acetabuloplasty is a good procedure to prevent early osteoarthritis by a better femoral head coverage.

Correction of the acetabular index is more crucial than the type of acetabuloplasty in developmental dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular remodeling may not be predictable after open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in older children. Several acetabuloplasties have been developed, and all are aimed at correcting the dysplastic acetabulum. The goal of this study is to evaluate if the type of pelvic acetabuloplasty and the corrected (postoperative) acetabular index (AI) affect early follow-up femoral head coverage. METHODS: A retrospective review of single-surgeon consecutive acetabuloplasties (Dega or Pemberton) from December 2012 to December 2015 was conducted. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of DDH, undergoing simultaneous primary open reduction, and follow-up of at least 18 months. Univariable analysis was based on the type of acetabuloplasty. The correlation between AI and final center edge angle (CEA) was tested. Multiple regression was performed. RESULTS: Of the total 58 hips in 39 patients included, 41 underwent Dega acetabuloplasty, and 17 had Pemberton acetabuloplasty. The median follow-up was 40.50 months (interquartile range 27.25-57). Pemberton acetabuloplasty produced a lower corrected AI, but the difference was not significant in follow-up measurements. Corrected AI was significantly correlated with final CEA (R = - 0.31, P = 0.018). In the multiple regression, only corrected AI was independently associated with final CEA (B = - 0.29, SE = 0.15, P = 0.06), whereas the type of acetabuloplasty, age, and preoperative severity of the dislocation were not. CONCLUSION: The correction obtained during acetabuloplasty affects early follow-up femoral head coverage. Ensuring proper sizing and placement of the grafted bone is probably more important than the type of acetabuloplasty chosen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Severe acetabular bone defects is a complex problem in revision hip arthroplasty, cage is one of the reconstruction options. The purpose of this study is to report the mid-long term clinical and radiographic results of Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects revised with reconstructional cage and morselized allogeneic cancellous bone graft without impaction. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty with reconstructional cage and allogeneic cancellous bone graft between January 2007 and January 2016. There were 13 Paprosky type IIIA bone defect patients and 15 Paprosky type IIIB bone defect patients and 4 patients of the 15 were also with pelvic discontinuity. Clinical assessment included Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short Form-12 (SF-12). Radiographic assessment included center of rotation, cage migration, and bone graft incorporation. RESULTS: All patients were followed up with a mean follow-up of 79.5 months (range 38-141), HHS improved from 31.4 (13-43) points preoperatively to 84.6 (55-94) points at last follow-up and SF-12 also improved significantly. There was 1 re-revision for the cage loosening and screw breakage at 61 months after surgery, and 2 patients had nonprogressive radiolucency in zone III and the junction of zone II and zone III at the bone implant interface. CONCLUSION: The reconstructional cage combining with morselized allografts without impaction achieves a good result with a high complete allograft incorporation rate in Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.

Arthroscopic Outcomes as a Function of Acetabular Coverage From a Large Hip Arthroscopy Study Group.

PURPOSE: To report comparative hip arthroscopic outcomes of patients with low (borderline dysplasia), normal, and high (global pincer femoroacetabular impingement [FAI]) lateral acetabular coverage. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a multicenter registry was performed. Primary hip arthroscopy patients were assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on preoperative lateral center-edge angle: borderline dysplasia (≤25°), normal (25.1°-38.9°), and pincer (≥39°). Repeated-measures analysis of variance compared preoperative with 2-year minimum postoperative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) scores. Subsequent analysis of variance determined the effect of acetabular coverage on magnitude of change in scores. RESULTS: Of 437 patients, the only statistical difference between groups was a lower prevalence of acetabuloplasty in the borderline dysplasia group (P = .001). A significant improvement in the preoperative to postoperative iHOT-12 scores for patients with normal acetabular coverage, acetabular undercoverage, and acetabular overcoverage was observed: F(1, 339) = 311.06; P <.001, with no statistical differences in preoperative (P = .505) and postoperative (P <.488) iHOT-12 scores when comparing the groups based on acetabular coverage. Mean iHOT-12 scores increased from 37.3 preoperatively to 68.7 postoperatively (P <.001) in the borderline dysplasia group, from 34.4 to 72 (P <.001) in the normal coverage group, and from 35.3 to 69.4 (P <.001) in the pincer group. These preoperative scores increased by 31.4, 37.8, and 34.1, respectively, with no effect for acetabular coverage on the magnitude of change from preoperative to postoperative iHOT-12 scores: F(2,339) = 1.18; P = .310. Ten patients (2.3%) underwent conversion arthroplasty, and 19 patients (4.4%) underwent revision arthroscopy with no significant effect of acetabular coverage on the incidence of revision or conversion surgery: χ2 (6,433) = 11.535; P = .073. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral acetabular coverage did not influence outcomes from primary hip arthroscopy when performed in patients with low (borderline dysplasia), normal, and high (global pincer FAI) lateral center-edge angle. Borderline dysplasia and moderate global pincer FAI with no or minimal osteoarthritis do not compromise successful 2-year minimum outcomes or survivorship following primary hip arthroscopy when performed by experienced surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective therapeutic trial.

Combined open reduction and Dega transiliac osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip in walking children.

The iliac osteotomy described by Dega in Poland, in 1969, is an acetabuloplasty that changes the acetabular configuration and its inclination. The aim of this work is to analyze a group of patients with DDH treated by combined open reduction and Dega transiliac osteotomy ,to evaluate the results and determine the advantages and disadvantages, as well as, assess the factors affecting the final outcome of such procedure. A prospective study was conducted during the period, from November 2010 to October 2014, on 39 hips, in 29 children, with neglected DDH after walking age, either diagnosed late or after failure to respond to previous non operative treatment. The mean age at the time of surgery was 27.6 months ranging from 18 to 48 months. All hips were followed up clinically and radiologically for a mean period of 33.6 months (range from 18 to 48 months). No patient was lost to follow up. At the end of follow up, satisfactory final clinical results were obtained in 34 hips (87.2%) and unsatisfactory in 5 (12.8%) according to McKay's criteria. Radiologically, satisfactory results were obtained in 32 hips (82.1%) and unsatisfactory in seven (17.9%), according to Severin's criteria. In conclusion, the results of our series show open reduction combined with Dega transiliac osteotomy to be a safe and efficient method for the surgical treatment of DDH in selected patients, and can easily and safely be combined with associated procedures for single stage correction of acetabular dysplasia.

Short-term follow-up of anterior and posterior both column fractures of acetabulum managed through both column plating.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of short-term follow-up of patients of both column acetabular fractures managed through anterior and posterior column plating. INTRODUCTION: Both column acetabular fractures are challenging articular injuries. Majority of them are treated operatively. The concept of "secondary congruence" was introduced by Letournel. Despite this, biomechanical data on secondary congruence indicate that nonoperative treatment leads to an increase in peak pressures in the supraacetabular region with the potential risk of developing posttraumatic degenerative osteoarthritis. Operative management is therefore justified. METHODOLOGY: A cohort of 10 patients having both column (anterior and posterior) acetabular fractures managed using bicolumnar plating between January 2016 and December 2017 were enrolled in the study and were analyzed during follow-up period. RESULTS: In total, 80% of the patients had excellent to good result. Average postoperative score was 85.7. Assessment was done using modified Harris Hip score.

Should Acetabular Retroversion Be Treated Arthroscopically? A Systematic Review of Open Versus Arthroscopic Techniques.

PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported outcomes, progression of radiographic arthritis, revision rates, and complications for hips with acetabular retroversion treated by open versus arthroscopic methods. METHODS: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched in August 2016 for literature on the open and arthroscopic techniques using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) method. All studies published in the English language that focused on the surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement caused by retroversion were included. All arthroscopic procedures, such as acetabuloplasty and labral repair, and open procedures, including anteverting periacetabular osteotomy and surgical dislocation with osteoplasty, were included. Articles that did not describe how retroversion was defined were excluded, as were studies with less than 6 months' follow-up and fewer than 5 patients. Two authors screened the results and selected articles for this review based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All results were scored using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. RESULTS: There were 386 results returned and 15 articles that met the inclusion criteria of this study. Among the studies, 11 reviewed arthroscopic techniques and 4 reviewed open surgical procedures. Both techniques yield good results based on patient-reported outcomes with minimal progression of osteoarthritis and low complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: This review showed statistically and clinically significant improvements for the treatment of acetabular retroversion based on patient-reported outcomes, with low progression of radiographic arthritis, revision rates, and complications using both open and arthroscopic methods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Surgical Trends in Arthroscopic Hip Surgery Using a Large National Database.

PURPOSE: To assess the practice trends in hip arthroscopy, including femoroplasty, acetabuloplasty, and labral repair Current Procedure Terminology, 4th edition (CPT-4), codes that have been implemented since many of the previous studies were published, without concerns for Hawthorne or observer effect as can be seen during a board collection window, and in a larger volume of patients with a more comprehensive database than previous published data. METHODS: The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was searched using CPT-4 codes to identify patients who underwent any arthroscopic hip procedure from 2008 to 2013. Patients identified were characterized by gender, age group, and year of the initial procedure. Regression analysis was used to evaluate differences in surgical trends between individual patient groups delineated by age and gender. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to identify significant differences in surgical trends seen yearly. RESULTS: A total of 62,782 arthroscopic hip procedures in 31,569 surgeries in 27,997 patients were identified and included from 2008 through 2013. The number of surgeries in the database increased every year. After changes to CPT coding in 2011, femoroplasty became the most common procedure in 2012, comprising 28% of all procedures performed in 2013. Patients ages 40 to 49 underwent the most procedures (7,467, 27%). Females were more likely to undergo any arthroscopic procedure during the study period (.068% vs .041%, P < .0001). A total of 2,754 patients (10%) underwent a second surgery during the study period. A total of 1,625 patients (6%) underwent a total hip arthroplasty following an arthroscopic procedure during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic hip procedures continue to increase, with femoroplasty, labral repair, and acetabuloplasty being the 3 most common procedures performed. Females are more likely to undergo any procedure, and labral repair is now performed more commonly than labral debridement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Sex-Dependent Differences in Preoperative, Radiographic, and Intraoperative Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: Results From the Multicenter Arthroscopic Study of the Hip Group.

PURPOSE: To compare preoperative, radiographic, and intraoperative findings between male and female patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a multicenter registry of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy between January 2014 and January 2017. Perioperative data from patients who consented to undergo surgery and completed preoperative patient-reported outcome questionnaires were analyzed to determine the effect of sex on preoperative symptoms, patient-reported outcomes, radiographic measures, and surgical procedures. RESULTS: A total of 1,437 patients (902 female and 535 male patients) with a mean age of 34 years were enrolled in the study. Female patients reported greater pain preoperatively on a visual analog scale (55.42 vs 50.40, P = .001) and deficits in functional abilities as per the modified Harris Hip Score (53.40 vs 57.83, P < .001) and International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (31.21 vs 38.51, P = .001) than male patients. There was a significant difference in the alpha angle (67.6° in male patients vs 59.5° in female patients, P < .001) corresponding with a higher prevalence of cam deformity in male patients (94.6% vs 84.5%, P < .001). Male patients had less range of motion in flexion (-5.67°, P < .001), internal rotation (-8.23°, P < .001), and external rotation (-4.52°, P < .001) than female patients. Acetabular chondroplasty was performed in 58% of male patients versus 40.2% of female patients (P < .001). Acetabuloplasty was performed in 59.1% of male patients versus 43.9% of female patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Male and female patients undergoing hip arthroscopy differ statistically in terms of preoperative hip function, hip morphology, and self-reported functional deficits, as well as the prevalence of surgical procedures. However, they do not differ significantly in terms of symptom localization, duration, or onset. The observed differences in preoperative functional scores between sexes, although statistically significant, may not represent clinically meaningful differences. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cross-sectional study.

Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in a Military Population Are Similar to Those in the Civilian Population: Matched Paired Analysis at 2 Years.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes, including the visual analog pain score, University of California Los Angeles activity, modified Harris hip score, and radiologic outcomes after hip arthroscopy in male patients whose symptoms developed during military services with those in a matched-pair control group of active young, nonmilitary patients at a minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years. METHODS: From September 2009 to December 2014, 28 male patients with mechanical symptoms that developed during military service underwent hip arthroscopic surgery. The control group included 28 professional male athletes who were matched with gender, Tönnis grade 0 or 1, crossover percentage, and labral procedure. At the minimum 2-year follow-up, radiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed using serial radiography. Statistical analysis was performed to confirm the differences between the preoperative and postoperative outcome measures. RESULTS: Most common arthroscopic procedures in the study and control groups were femoroplasty (64.4% vs 53.6%) and labral repair (64.3% vs 53.6%). All improvements in both groups were statistically significant at the last postoperative follow-up (P < .001). In the study group, 89.3% of soldiers were able to return to their preoperative military branch. Although radiologic and clinical outcomes in both groups were not significantly different, hospitalization time in soldiers was significantly longer than that in the control group (79.4 ± 27.0 vs 4.0 ± 1.3 days, P < .001). Time of return to their preoperative military branch in the study group was similar to sports activity in the control group (5.9 ± 4.3 vs 6.3 ± 3.7 months, P = .258). CONCLUSIONS: Male patients with symptoms that developed during military services achieved similar levels of benefit from hip arthroscopy as those in the control group of active young patients. Although hospitalization time in the military population was significantly longer than that in the control group, time to return to activity was similar in both groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative trial.

Endoscopic shelf acetabuloplasty can improve clinical outcomes and achieve return to sports-related activity in active patients with hip dysplasia.

PURPOSE: To investigate clinical outcomes and return to sports-related activity following endoscopic shelf acetabuloplasty combined with labral repair in the treatment of the active patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, 32 patients (36 hips; 11 males and 21 females; 11 right 17 left 4 bilateral; median age 28.5, range 12-51 years), who underwent endoscopic shelf acetabuloplasty combined with labral repair and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. There was a minimum follow-up of 2 years (average 32.3 ± 3 months, range 24-48 months). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores including the modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and Non-Arthritis Hip Score (NAHS) were obtained preoperatively and at final follow-up for the assessment of surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The mean MHHS significantly improved from 68.4 ± 14.3 (range 23.1-95.7) preoperatively to 94.5 ± 8.5 (range 66-100) at final follow-up (p = 0.001). Similarly, the NAHS also significantly improved from 51.3 ± 11.9 (range 23-76) preoperatively to 73.0 ± 7.4 (range 44-80) at final follow-up (p = 0.001). The mean LCE angle significantly increased postoperatively but partially decreased at final follow-up (mean preoperative versus postoperative versus final follow-up: 16.0 range 5-24, versus 40.1 range 27-58, versus 30.1 range 20-41. p = 0.001, respectively). There were 3 patients who returned to a higher activity level, 20 patients who returned to the same activity level, and 6 patients who returned to a lower activity level. The mean period from surgery to return to play was 9.0 ± 3.5 months (range 5-18). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic shelf acetabuloplasty provides promising clinical outcomes and return to sports-related activity for active patients with DDH. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.