Prophylactic Versus Reactive Megestrol Acetate Use for Critical Body Weight Loss in Patients with Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

This study compared the effects of megestrol acetate (MA) prophylactic (p-MA) versus reactive (r-MA) use for critical body-weight loss (>5% from baseline) during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with advanced pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (PLSCC).Patients receiving CCRT alone in two phase-II trials were included for analyses. Both the p-MA and r-MA cohorts received the same treatment protocol at the same institution, and the critical body-weight loss, survival, and adverse event profiles were compared.The mean (SD) weight loss was 5.1% (4.7%) in the p-MA cohort (n = 54) vs. 8.1% (4.6%) in the r-MA cohort (n = 50) (p = .001). The percentage of subjects with body-weight loss >5% was 42.6% in the p-MA cohort vs. 68.0% in the r-MA cohort (p = .011). Tube feeding was needed in 22.2% of p-MA vs. 62.0% of r-MA patients (p < .001). Less neutropenia (26.0% vs. 70.0% [p < .001]) and a shorter duration of grade 3-4 mucositis (2.4 ± 1.4 vs. 3.6 ± 2.0 wk [p = .009]) were observed with p-MA treatment. Disease-specific survival, locoregional control, or distant metastasis-free survival did not differ. Less competing mortality from secondary primary cancer resulted in a better overall survival trend in the p-MA cohort.p-MA may reduce body-weight loss and improve adverse event profiles during CCRT for patients with PLSCC.

Mirtazapine versus megestrol acetate in treatment of anorexia-cachexia in advanced cancer patients: a randomized, double-blind trial.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer-related anorexia-cachexia comprises one of the most common syndromes of advanced cancer patients. The management of cancer-related anorexia-cachexia is a great challenge in clinical practice. There are no definite practice guidelines yet for the prevention and treatment of cancer-related anorexia-cachexia. This study is considered to find out whether there is any role of mirtazapine in the improvement of anorexia in cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 80 cancer-anorexia patients were enrolled. Patients in the trial arm received the standard chemotherapy medication plus one tablet of mirtazapine 15 mg daily at night orally for 8 weeks starting from the day of an initial assessment. The control arm received the standard chemotherapy medication plus one tablet of megestrol acetate 160 mg daily orally for 8 weeks starting from the day of an initial assessment. Each patient was assessed by validated versions of Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy Anorexia/Cachexia Sub Scale v 4 questionnaires. RESULTS: After 4 and 8 weeks each patient was evaluated again using the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy Anorexia/Cachexia Sub Scale tool. The quality of life of each patient was assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment QLQ-C30 v 3.0. After 4 to 8 weeks of treatment, the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy Anorexia/Cachexia Sub Scale score in cancer anorexia patients in the mirtazapine improved anorexia significantly. However, the improvement after 4 to 8 weeks was not statistically significant when it was compared with the megestrol acetate (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, the findings of this study reveal that mirtazapine might be a potential alternative to megestrol acetate, as it has shown potential efficacy as like as megestrol acetate.

A taste alteration-related scale assesses megestrol to improve chemotherapy-induced anorexia.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of megestrol in improving chemotherapy-related anorexia by analyzing the related scales of taste alteration. METHODS: We conducted the current study on a group of advanced patients with cancer with two or more chemotherapy cycles. The chemotherapy-induced taste alteration scale (CiTAs) scale helped assess the megestrol effects on basic taste perception, aversive taste changes, unpleasant symptoms, and associated concerns. Furthermore, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire scale (SNAQ) helped measure the impact of megestrol on malnutrition likelihood in patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced anorexia. The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF Scale was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants, producing scores related to physical health, psychological well-being, environmental factors, and social relationships. RESULTS: The CiTAs scale assessment indicated that administering megestrol significantly enhanced taste perception among advanced patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Notably, the megestrol group patients showed significantly higher Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ) scores than the control group. The megestrol group patients also exhibited higher physiological (PHYS) scores than their control group counterparts. However, this distinction was not statistically significant. The study findings indicate that patients who received megestrol demonstrated significantly higher scores in psychological (PSYCH) and environmental(ENVIR) domains than the control group. Furthermore, megestrol administration was associated with significantly elevated SOCIL and ENVIR levels in patients. CONCLUSION: The proficient efficacy evaluation of megestrol in enhancing appetite, mitigating malnutrition likelihood, and improving the quality of life of chemotherapy-induced anorexic patients can be achieved through taste-related scales.

Clinical implication of megestrol acetate in metastatic gastric cancer: a big data analysis from Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) database.

OBJECTIVE: Megestrol acetate (MA) is used to manage anorexia and cachexia in patients with advanced cancer. This study investigated the prescription patterns of MA in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, as well as evaluated its impact on survival outcomes and the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: A Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) service database was used to investigate differences in baseline characteristics, survival, and the incidence of VTE according to MA prescription patterns (i.e., prescription vs. no prescription) in patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer from July 2014 to December 2015. RESULTS: A total of 1938 patients were included in this study. In total, 65% of the patients were prescribed MA. Older age, treatment in tertiary hospitals, and palliative chemotherapy were statistically significant predictive factors for MA prescription. Continuous prescription of MA was observed in 37% of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between the MA and non-MA prescription groups on multivariate analysis. Among the 1427 patients included in the analysis for VTE incidence, 4.3% and 2.9% were diagnosed with VTE during the follow-up period in the MA and non-MA prescription groups, respectively. However, there was no statistically significant difference in VTE diagnosis between the groups on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: MA is commonly prescribed for metastatic gastric cancer, especially in elderly patients and those undergoing palliative chemotherapy, without significantly affecting survival or VTE risk.

A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing megestrol acetate to levonorgestrel-intrauterine system in fertility sparing treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: The objective of the trial was to compare the regression rate of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) in patients treated with megestrol acetate (MA) vs. levonorgestrel-intrauterine device (LNG-IUS). We also aimed to assess the fertility and pregnancy outcomes in these patients. METHODS: The study was a phase II multi-centre randomised controlled trial on the use of MA compared to LNG-IUS in the treatment of AEH conducted from January 2020 to January 2024 in Singapore. Women who were diagnosed with AEH and between 21 and 40 years old were included. The patients were randomised to receive either MA (160 mg orally daily) or LNG-IUS. The primary outcomes assessed were the regression rates at 3 months, 6 months and 9 months of treatment. The secondary outcomes assessed were the side effects, patient acceptability and fertility outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients completed the trial. The overall regression rate was 88.9% by 9 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the 9-month complete regression rate between MA vs. LNG-IUS. There was also no significant difference in side effects and weight change between both arms. Nineteen patients were actively pursuing fertility after complete regression. There were 8 pregnancies achieved, with resultant 4 live births and 4 miscarriages. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms a high regression rate of AH with medical treatment. LNG-IUS is a non-inferior treatment compared to megestrol acetate. Successful pregnancy outcomes can be achieved after regression of AEH. Long-term studies of sufficient sample-size are needed to assess for fertility and pregnancy outcomes, risk of recurrence and long-term risk of malignancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered with the Health Science Authority (HSA) (License No.: CTA1900087) on September 5, 2019: https://eservice.hsa.gov.sg/prism/ct_r/enquiry.do?action=loadSpecificDetail . The trial was registered retrospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05492487) on April 7, 2022: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05492487 .

[The long-term efficacy of metformin in megestrol acetate-based fertility-sparing treatment for patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia and endometrioid endometrial cancer].

Objective: To assess the long-term efficacy of metformin in megestrol acetate (MA)-based fertility-sparing treatment for patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) and endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). Methods: The randomized controlled trail study was conducted from October 2013 to October 2017 in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Patients with EAH or EEC were firstly stratified according to pathology, and randomized to receive MA (160 mg orally, daily) plus metformin (500 mg orally, three times a day) or MA (160 mg orally, daily). Baseline data between two groups of patients were compared. Estimates of time to complete remission (CR) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of related factors for recurrence-free survival. Quantitative data were represented by M (Q1, Q3). Results: A total of 150 patients were included, and 76 patients were allocated to receive MA plus metformin with the age of 32.5 (28.0, 36.0), while 74 patients received MA alone with the age of 32.0 (28.0, 36.0). By the end of follow-up period, 96.7% (n=145) of patients achieved complete remission, with a median follow-up time of 57.7 (26.7, 70.5) months. The median CR time for the MA plus metformin group and the MA alone group were 6.3 (3.5, 8.3) months and 6.8 (4.0, 9.3) months, respectively (P=0.193), with 2-year cumulative CR rate of 98.6% and 98.5%, respectively (P=0.879). The median time of RFS was 28.1 (12.5, 57.3) months for the MA plus metformin group and 33.3 (14.1, 62.5) months for the MA alone group (P=0.213), with a cumulative RFS rate of 61.9% and 65.8%, respectively (P=0.560). In the subgroup of non-obese (body mass index<28 kg/m2) patients with EAH, the median RFS times were 25.7 (7.6, 60.3) months and 47.3 (17.5, 64.8) months for the MA plus metformin group and the MA alone group, respectively (P=0.033), with a cumulative RFS rate of 57.5% and 80.6%, respectively (P=0.029). According to Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, undergoing assisted reproductive treatment (HR=2.358, 95%CI: 1.069-5.204, P=0.034) was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence-free survival after complete remission of endometrial lesions. Conclusion: The long-term follow-up outcome indicates that there is no significant difference in CR time and RFS time between MA plus metformin therapy and MA alone therapy for patients with EAH or EEC.

Comparison of the effect of levonorgestrel-intrauterine system with or without oral megestrol acetate on fertility-preserving treatment in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia: A prospective, open-label, randomized controlled phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of levonorgestrel-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with or without oral megestrol acetate (MA) versus MA alone on fertility-preserving treatment in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). METHODS: This was a single-center phase II study with an open-label, randomized, controlled trial conducted between July 2017 and June 2020 at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. A total of 180 patients (18-45 years) with primary AEH were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to the MA (N = 60), LNG-IUS (N = 60), or MA + LNG-IUS (N = 60) groups, in which the patients received MA (160 mg orally daily), LNG-IUS, or MA + LNG-IUS (MA 160 mg orally daily plus LNG-IUS), respectively. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate at 16 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoints were CR rate at 32 weeks of treatment, adverse events, and recurrence and pregnancy rates. All analyses were conducted in a modified intention to treat (ITT) population who underwent randomization and in whom treatment was initiated. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 16-week CR rates (with 95% confidence interval) were 19.2% (9.0-29.4%) in the MA group, 35.0% (22.8-47.2%) in the LNG-IUS group, and 29.4% (17.2-41.6%) in the MA + LNG-IUS groups. Side effects such as weight gain, increased nocturnal urine, night sweat, insomnia and edema face seemed to occur less frequently in LNG-IUS group compared with MA group. No difference was found among groups regarding second endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: LNG-IUS or LNG-IUS plus MA did not show significant therapeutic benefit compared with MA alone. Further studies including sufficient sample-size are needed to validate these findings due to the underpowered design of this trial. FUNDING: This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No 2019YFC1005200 and 2019YFC1005204), Shanghai Medical Centre of Key Programs for Female Reproductive Diseases (Grant No. 2017ZZ010616), Shanghai sailing program (Grant No. 19YF1404200), and Shen Kang clinical project (SHDC22021219). Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT03241888. https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT03241888?term=NCT03241888&draw=2&rank=1.

Propensity score-matching analysis comparing safety outcomes of appetite-stimulating medications in oncology patients.

PURPOSE: Anorexia and weight loss are common complications in the elderly, advanced cancer population. Appetite stimulants are commonly used therapies for oncology patients with weight loss, yet their safety comparison remains unknown. METHODS: This was a two-center, retrospective, study conducted in New York City at Mount Sinai Beth Israel and New York University Langone from January 2016 to July 2019 in adult patients with histologic evidence of malignancy who were taking either megestrol acetate or mirtazapine as an appetite-stimulating medication. Endpoints included safety concerns of mortality, QTc prolongation, venous thromboembolism, fall, somnolence, xerostomia, and hallucinations. Effectiveness of weight gain or maintenance of weight was not assessed. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed using a logistic regression analysis to assess the two comparable groups. RESULTS: The study included 350 patients (69.56 ± 13.31 years) with the most common malignancies being gastrointestinal, breast, and hematologic with metastasis present in over half the patients. Adverse events were commonly seen in the oncology population. After a propensity score-matched analysis, all safety outcomes associated with mirtazapine compared to megestrol acetate were similar; all-cause mortality (7%, n = 7 vs. 12%, n = 12, p = 0.23), QTc prolongation (31%, n = 31 vs. 31%, n = 31, p = 1.00), thromboembolism (11%, n = 11 vs. 11%, n = 11, p = 1.00), somnolence (29%, n = 30 vs. 22%, n = 23, p = 0.34), xerostomia (27%, n = 28 vs. 18%, n = 19, p = 0.24), and hallucinations (17%, n = 18 vs. 8%, n = 8, p = 0.06), respectfully. CONCLUSION: There were no safety differences seen when evaluating both agents.

Appetite stimulants for people with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic loss of appetite in cystic fibrosis concerns both individuals and families. Appetite stimulants have been used to help cystic fibrosis patients with chronic anorexia attain optimal body mass index (BMI) and nutritional status. However, these may have adverse effects on clinical status. This is an updated version of the original review. OBJECTIVES: To systematically search for and evaluate the evidence on the beneficial effects of appetite stimulants in the management of cystic fibrosis-related anorexia and synthesise reports of any side effects. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register and online trials registries; handsearched reference lists; and contacted local and international experts to identify relevant trials. Last search of the Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 23 May 2022. Last search of online trial registries: 10 May 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of appetite stimulants compared to placebo, control, no treatment or different appetite stimulants, or to the same appetite stimulants at different doses or regimens for at least one month in adults and children with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of the included trials. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence and performed meta-analyses. MAIN RESULTS: We included four trials (70 participants) comparing appetite stimulants (cyproheptadine hydrochloride and megestrol acetate) to placebo; the numbers of adults or children within each trial were not always reported. We assessed the certainty of evidence as low due to the small number of participants, incomplete or selective outcome reporting, and unclear risk of selection bias.  Regarding our primary outcomes, a meta-analysis of two trials (42 participants) showed that appetite stimulants may produce a larger increase in weight (kg) at three months (mean difference (MD) 1.25 kg, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.45 to 2.05), and one trial (17 participants) showed a similar result at six months (MD 3.80 kg, 95% CI 1.27 to 6.33) (both low-certainty evidence). Results also showed that weight z score may increase with appetite stimulants compared to placebo at three months (MD 0.61, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.93; 3 studies; 40 participants; P < 0.001) and at six months (MD 0.74, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.22; 1 trial; 17 participants). There was no evidence of a difference in effect between cyproheptadine hydrochloride and megestrol acetate for either outcome.   Only one trial (25 participants) reported analysable data for body composition (BMI), with results favouring cyproheptadine hydrochloride compared to placebo; a further trial (16 participants) narratively agreed with this result. All four trials reported on lung function at durations ranging from two to nine months. Considering analysable data, two trials (42 participants) found that appetite stimulants may make little or no difference in forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) % predicted at three months, and one trial (17 participants) found similar results at six months. Two further three-month trials narratively agreed with these results. Limited information was reported for secondary outcomes. Two trials (23 participants) reported results showing that appetite stimulants may increase appetite compared to placebo at three months (odds ratio 45.25, 95% CI 3.57 to 573.33; low-certainty evidence).  Only one study reported on quality of life, finding that cyproheptadine reduced fatigue in two participants compared with none with placebo. One study (25 participants) found no difference in energy intake between appetite stimulant or placebo at three months. Insufficient reporting of adverse effects prevented a full determination of their impact. Two studies (33 participants) narratively reported similar requirements for additional antibiotics between appetite stimulants and placebo at three months.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: At six months in adults and children, appetite stimulants improved only two of the outcomes of this review: weight (or weight z score) and subjectively reported appetite. Insufficient reporting of side effects prevented a full determination of their impact. Whilst the data may suggest the potential use of appetite stimulants in treating anorexia in adults and children with cystic fibrosis, this is based upon low-certainty evidence from a small number of trials, therefore firm conclusions cannot be drawn. Clinicians need to be aware of the potential adverse effects of appetite stimulants and actively monitor any individuals prescribed these medications accordingly. Research is required to determine meaningful surrogate measures for appetite and to define what constitutes quality weight gain. Future trials of appetite stimulants should use a validated measure of symptoms including a disease-specific instrument for measuring poor appetite. This review highlights the need for multicentred, adequately powered, and well-designed trials to evaluate agents to safely increase appetite in people with cystic fibrosis and to establish the optimal mode of treatment.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device plus metformin, or megestrol acetate plus metformin for fertility-sparing treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial carcinoma: a prospective, randomized, blind-endpoint design trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial adenocarcinoma (EC) is the fifth most common cancer in women worldwide, standard treatment for EC includes hysterectomy, but it results in the loss of reproductive function. Thus, conservative treatment for these patients is strongly demanded, progestin therapy is widely accepted as the main fertility-sparing treatment for young women with endometrial hyperplasia with atypia (EHA) and well-differentiated endometrioid endometrial cancer. This trial will investigate the effectiveness of conservative treatment for obese women with early-stage EC. METHOD AND DESIGN: This will be an open-label, 2-armed, randomized, phase-II single-center trial of LNG-IUD plus metformin or megestrol acetate (MA) plus metformin. A total of 88 participants will be randomly assigned into 2 treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical, laboratory, ultrasound and radiology data, will be collected at baseline, and then at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. EC biomarkers will be collected at baseline. The primary aim is to determine the efficacy of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) plus metformin, or megestrol acetate (MA) plus metformin in achieving pathological complete response (pCR) at 12 months, as well as post-treatment pregnancy outcomes and recurrence rate. The secondary aims are to predict the response to an LNG-IUD plus metformin and MA plus metformin via clinical, blood, and tissue predictive biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective evidence for conservative treatment of EC is limited. New methods to achieve better CR rates with fewer side effects are needed. This trial will investigate the effectiveness of LNG-IUD plus metformin, and MA plus metformin, in obese women with early-stage EC, providing a non-surgical treatment option for these patients. Trial registration ChiCTR2200055624. The trial was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx on January 15, 2022.

Endometrial adenocarcinoma (EC) is the fifth most common cancer in women worldwide, and up to 90% of EC patients are obese. Standard treatment for EC includes hysterectomy, but it leads to loss of reproductive function. This trial will investigate the effectiveness of non-surgical treatment for obese women with early-stage EC. There is limited prospective evidence for the conservative treatment of EC. New methods to achieve better CR rates with fewer side effects are needed. In this trial, patients with early-stage EC will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive treatment with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) plus metformin, or megestrol acetate (MA) plus metformin. The primary aims are to determine the effectiveness of the 2 treatments to achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) at 12 months, pregnancy outcomes, and recurrence rate. The secondary aims are to predict the response to the 2 treatments using clinical data and blood and tissue predictive biomarkers. If the trial results indicate the treatments are effective, they may significantly reduce the incidence of adverse events in obese EC patients receiving current treatments, and preserve fertility; thereby improving patients' quality of life and reducing healthcare costs.

Clinical Features and Risk Factors of Adrenal Insufficiency in Patients With Cancer Admitted to the Hospitalist-Managed Medical Unit.

BACKGROUND: The symptoms of adrenal insufficiency (AI) overlap with the common effects of advanced cancer and chemotherapy. Considering that AI may negatively affect the overall prognosis of cancer patients if not diagnosed in a timely manner, we analyzed the incidence, risk factors, and predictive methods of AI in cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 184 adult patients with malignancy who underwent a rapid adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulation test in the medical hospitalist units of a tertiary hospital. Their baseline characteristics and clinical features were evaluated, and the risk factors for AI were identified using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the study patients, 65 (35%) were diagnosed with AI, in whom general weakness (63%) was the most common symptom. Multivariate logistic regression showed that eosinophilia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-16.63; P = 0.036), history of steroid use (aOR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.10-5.15; P = 0.028), and history of megestrol acetate use (aOR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.38-5.33; P = 0.004) were associated with AI. Baseline cortisol levels of 6.2 µg/dL and 12.85 µg/dL showed a specificity of 95.0% and 95.4% for AI diagnosis, respectively. CONCLUSION: AI was found in about one-third of patients with cancer who showed general symptoms that may be easily masked by cancer or chemotherapy, suggesting that clinical suspicion of AI is important while treating cancer patients. History of corticosteroids or megestrol acetate were risk factors for AI and eosinophilia was a pre-test predictor of AI. Baseline cortisol level appears to be a useful adjunct marker for AI.

Nanoemulsions Containing Megestrol Acetate: Development, Characterization, and Stability Evaluation.

Many active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) are poorly soluble in water and their low oral bioavailability is a major hindrance to their potential use. Megestrol acetate (MGA) is insoluble in water and its oral absorption is limited and considerably affected by food. Nanoemulsions (NEs) can be used as effective oral drug delivery systems where the hydrophobic API is loaded into the oil phase. In this study, MGA-loaded NEs were prepared based on the spontaneous emulsification technique. The effects of different excipients such as ethanol, Tween 80, Lipoid E80, and medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) on the NEs characterization were investigated. The experimental results indicated that optimum MGA-loaded NEs (F20) were nanometer-sized droplets (166.9 ± 3.0 nm) with negative zeta potential (-12.2 ± 1.1 mV). The effect of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) on characteristic properties of F20 was also evaluated. On the selected NEs, in vitro dissolution tests and stability studies in various mediums and storage conditions were performed. The encapsulation efficiency of NEs were > 99%. The overall droplet size of F20 and PVP-2 (PVP-coated NEs) remained relatively stable as the pH changed from 1.2 to 6.8. It was determined that F20 and PVP-2 remained stable at 4°C until 12 weeks and had higher cytotoxicity on MCF-7 cells. To conclude, droplet size, surface charge, and stability are important properties for NEs to have sufficient effectiveness. In this study, alternative oral NEs of low-solubility drug MGA were developed considering the above features.

Continued medical treatment for persistent early endometrial cancer in young women.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of continuing medical therapy in patients who did not achieve complete response (CR) despite 9 months of progestin treatment. We also sought to determine the prognostic factors associated with achieving CR among these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with presumed stage IA, grade 1 or 2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma who had persistent disease on biopsy performed at 9-12 months after at least 9 months of progestin-based therapy. Data on clinicopathological factors and oncological and obstetrical outcomes following continuous hormonal treatment were extracted from the patients' medical records and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses for predicting CR were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven (72.5%) of 51 patients achieved CR after prolonged fertility-sparing treatment. Median time to CR from starting initial progestin was 17.3 months (range, 12.1-91.7 months). On univariate analysis, history of polycystic ovarian syndrome, histologic grade 2, and not achieving partial response (PR) until 12 months were significantly associated with failure to CR (odds ratio [OR], 6.188, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.405-27.244, p = 0.018; OR, 9.722, 95% CI, 1.614-58.581, p = 0.013; and OR, 21.750, 95% CI, 4.016-117.783, p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that not achieving PR until 12 months was an independent prognostic factor predicting failure to CR after prolonged progestin therapy (OR, 21.803, 95% CI, 3.601-132.025, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Continued medical treatment is effective for persistent early endometrial carcinoma after at least 9 months of progestin therapy in young women who want to preserve their fertility.

Mismatch repair status influences response to fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients younger than 40 years usually present with early-stage endometrial cancer with favorable prognosis. However, such patients are usually in their childbearing age and may desire fertility-sparing options. The identification of biomarkers may improve the clinical outcomes in these patients and aid in fertility-sparing management; however, there has been no reports on biomarker analysis so far. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer in the fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 57 endometrial biopsy specimens obtained before hormone therapy were evaluated, and patients were classified according to the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer molecular subtypes (mismatch repair deficiency, DNA polymerase epsilon mutation, wild-type p53, and abnormal p53). The primary endpoint was the response rate after hormone therapy. The secondary endpoint was the recurrence rate after the complete response, hysterectomy rate owing to treatment failure, and upstaged diagnosis rate after hysterectomy. RESULTS: Of 57 patients, 9 (15.8%) had mismatch repair deficiency, 2 (3.5%) had DNA polymerase epsilon mutation, 45 (78.9%) had wild-type p53, and 1 (1.8%) had abnormal p53. Overall, the complete response rate was 75.4% after hormone therapy. Patients with mismatch repair deficiency had a significantly lower complete response or partial response rate than those with wild-type p53 in terms of the best overall response (44.4% [95% confidence interval, 4.0-85.0] vs 82.2% [95% confidence interval, 71.0-94.0]; P=.018) and complete response rate at 6 months (11.1% [95% confidence interval, 0.2-37.0] vs 53.3% [95% confidence interval, 38.0-68.0]; P=.010). Among patients with mismatch repair deficiency, 4 underwent immediate hysterectomy because of treatment failure and 3 presented upstaged diagnosis after hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: The Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer molecular classification has prognostic significance in the fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer, thereby enabling early stratification and risk assignment to direct care. Mismatch repair status could be used as a predictive biomarker for selecting patients who could benefit from hormone therapy. These findings need to be validated in larger studies.

Conservative management of grade 2 stage IA endometrial carcinoma and literature review.

PURPOSE: To explore the clinical outcomes of megestrol acetate alone or plus metformin in young women with grade 2 stage IA endometrial carcinoma who ask for preserved fertility. METHODS: Patients with stage IA grade 2 endometrial carcinoma who asked for fertility-sparing treatment in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University between 2015 and 2017 were enrolled and retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Four patients were included and treated with oral megestrol acetate (160 mg per day), while metformin (500 mg, thrice daily) was added for patients with metabolic syndrome. Regular hysteroscopic examination was performed every 3 months during the conservative treatment. Overall, 75% (3/4) of the patients had a complete response, one relapsed and achieved a complete response after changing the therapy plan, and one patient had an indication of myometrial invasion during fertility-sparing treatment and chose to remove uterus. CONCLUSIONS: Fertility-sparing treatment for stage IA grade 2 endometrial carcinoma patients is worth exploration. Megestrol acetate with or without metformin combined with hysteroscopic lesion ablation may be an effective therapy.

Hydrophilic and Functionalized Nanographene Oxide Incorporated Faster Dissolving Megestrol Acetate.

The aim of this work is to present an approach to enhance the dissolution of progestin medication, megestrol acetate (also known as MEGACE), for improving the dissolution rate and kinetic solubility by incorporating nano graphene oxide (nGO). An antisolvent precipitation process was investigated for nGO-drug composite preparation, where prepared composites showed crystalline properties that were similar to the pure drug but enhanced aqueous dispersibility and colloidal stability. To validate the efficient release profile of composite, in vitro dissolution testing was carried out using United States Pharmacopeia, USP-42 paddle method, with gastric pH (1.4) and intestinal pH (6.5) solutions to mimic in vivo conditions. Pure MA is practically insoluble (2 µg/mL at 37 °C). With the incorporation of nGO, it was possible to dissolve nearly 100% in the assay. With the incorporation of 1.0% of nGO, the time required to dissolve 50% and 80% of drug, namely T50 and T80, decreased from 138.0 min to 27.0 min, and the drug did not dissolve for 97.0 min in gastric media, respectively. Additionally, studies done in intestinal media have revealed T50 did not dissolve for 92.0 min. This work shows promise in incorporating functionalized nanoparticles into the crystal lattice of poorly soluble drugs to improve dissolution rate.

Metformin plus megestrol acetate compared with megestrol acetate alone as fertility-sparing treatment in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and well-differentiated endometrial cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of metformin in megestrol acetate (MA)-based fertility-sparing treatment for patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). DESIGN: A randomised, single-centre, open-label, controlled trial conducted between October 2013 and December 2017. SETTING: Shanghai OBGYN Hospital of Fudan University, China. POPULATION: A total of 150 patients (18-45 years old) with primary AEH or well-differentiated EEC were randomised into an MA group (n = 74) and an MA plus metformin group (n = 76). METHODS: Patients with AEH or EEC were firstly stratified, then randomised to receive MA (160 mg orally, daily) or MA (160 mg orally, daily) plus metformin (500 mg orally, three times a day). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary efficacy parameter was the cumulate complete response (CR) rate within 16 weeks of treatment (16w-CR rate); the secondary efficacy parameters were 30w-CR rate and adverse events. RESULTS: The 16w-CR rate was higher in the metformin plus MA group than in the MA-only group (34.3 versus 20.7%, odds ratio [OR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-4.51, P = 0.09) but the difference was more significant in 102 AEH patients (39.6 versus 20.4%, OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.06-6.21, P = 0.04). This effect of metformin was also significant in non-obese (51.4 versus 24.3%, OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.22-8.84, P = 0.02) and insulin-sensitive (54.8 versus 28.6%, OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.03-8.97, P = 0.04) subgroups of AEH women. No significant result was found in secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: As a fertility-sparing treatment, metformin plus MA was associated with a higher early CR rate compared with MA alone in AEH patients. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: For AEH patients, metformin plus MA might be a better fertility-sparing treatment to achieve a higher early CR rate compared with MA alone.

Oncologic and obstetrical outcomes after fertility-preserving retreatment in patients with recurrent atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: A number of patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer have not yet given birth when they relapse after achieving complete response with initial fertility-preserving treatment. Often such patients still have a strong desire for fertility preservation; however, there are limited reports in the related literature on the efficacy of fertility-preserving retreatment in patients with relapse. This study intends to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fertility-preserving retreatment in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer after recurrence following initial fertility-preserving treatment. METHODS: Data from 110 patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer who received fertility-preserving treatment in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital (December 2005 to September 2019) were collected, and a retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical characteristics, histopathology results, and outcomes of 25 patients with recurrence. RESULTS: 25 patients (9 with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and 16 with endometrial cancer) received fertility-preserving retreatment. After a median treatment duration of 5 months (range 3-18), 21 patients (84%, 21/25) achieved complete response and 4 patients (16%, 4/25) had a partial response. The median follow-up time was 19.5 months (range 8-76), and a total of 8 patients (38.1%, 8/21) relapsed. The time from retreatment to complete response for endometrial cancer was significantly longer than that for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (7.5 vs 3 months; p=0.007). Among the 21 patients who achieved complete response, 12 patients had a desire for fertility, among whom 8 patients had a successful pregnancy (66.7%, 8/12) and 6 patients experienced term birth (1 patient with natural pregnancy and 5 patients with assisted reproductive technology). Six patients (50%, 6/12) delivered 6 full-term babies. CONCLUSION: The response rate is high and obstetrical outcomes are favorable after fertility-preserving retreatment in patients with recurrence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer.

Treatment efficiency of comprehensive hysteroscopic evaluation and lesion resection combined with progestin therapy in young women with endometrial atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of comprehensive hysteroscopic evaluation and lesion resection combined with progestin therapy in young patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) and early stage endometrial cancer (EEC) who wished to preserve their fertility. METHODS: Patients with EAH (n = 120) or well-differentiated EEC (n = 40, FIGO stage IA, without myometrial invasion) were retrospectively included. All patients received constant oral progestin combined with hysteroscopic evaluation every 3 months until achieving complete response (CR). The location, number and size of each suspected lesion or cluster were detailly recorded during the hysteroscopy. RESULTS: The median age was 32.0 year-old (range, 22-47 year-old). Totally 148 patients (97.4%) achieved CR while 3 EAH and 1 EEC patients presented with disease progression, and 8 patients were still in treatment. The mean treatment duration for achieving CR was 6.7 ±â€¯0.3 months (range, 1-18 months). After adjusting for patient age, body mass index (BMI), history of pregnancy and type of conservative therapies, lesion size ≤2 cm (OR, 0.701; 95% CI, 0.496-0.991; P = 0.045) was significantly correlated with shorter treatment time to achieve CR. Among 60 patients attempted to conceive after achieving CR, 45.0% (15/60) had been pregnant, 25.0% (15/60) delivered live birth, 13.3% (8/60) are still in pregnancy, while 6.7% experienced spontaneous abortion. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive hysteroscopic evaluation and lesion resection plus progestin therapy seem to be an effective and safe fertility sparing therapy for patients with EAH or EEC. Endometrial lesion size ≤2 cm correlated with a shorter treatment period to achieve CR.

Endocrine treatment of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma; quantification of efficacy and identification of response predictors.

OBJECTIVES: The role of endocrine therapy (ET) in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is poorly defined due to the lack of phase III data and significant heterogeneity of clinical trials performed. In this study, we sought to identify predictive factors of endocrine sensitivity in HGSOC. METHODS: HGSOC patients who received at least four weeks of ET for relapsed disease following one line of chemotherapy at the Edinburgh Cancer Centre were identified. Exclusion criteria were use of endocrine therapy as maintenance therapy or of unknown duration. Duration of therapy and best CA125 response as per modified GCIG criteria were recorded. Oestrogen receptor (ER) histoscore, treatment free interval, prior lines of chemotherapy, and type of ET were evaluated as predictive factors. RESULTS: Of 431 patients identified, 269 were eligible (77.0% letrozole, 18.6% tamoxifen, 2.2% megesterol acetate, 2.2% other). The median duration of therapy was 126 days (range 28-1427 days). 32.7% remained on ET for ≥180 days and 14.1% for ≥365 days. The CA125 response and clinical benefit rates (response or stable disease) were 8.1% and 40.1% respectively. ER histoscore >200 (P = 0.0016) and a treatment free interval of ≥180 days (P < 0.0001) were independent predictive factors upon multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: ET should be considered as a viable strategy to defer subsequent chemotherapy for relapsed HGSOC. Patients with an ER histoscore >200 and a treatment free interval of ≥180 days are most likely to derive benefit.