Integration of Pathological Criteria and Immunohistochemical Evaluation for Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Diagnosis: Recommendations From the European Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most frequent type of breast cancer (BC) and its peculiar morphology is mainly driven by inactivation of CDH1, the gene coding for E-cadherin cell adhesion protein. ILC-specific therapeutic and disease-monitoring approaches are gaining momentum in the clinic, increasing the importance of accurate ILC diagnosis. Several essential and desirable morphologic diagnostic criteria are currently defined by the World Health Organization, the routine use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for E-cadherin is not recommended. Disagreement in the diagnosis of ILC has been repeatedly reported, but interpathologist agreement increases with the use of E-cadherin IHC. In this study, we aimed to harmonize the pathological diagnosis of ILC by comparing 5 commonly used E-cadherin antibody clones (NCH-38, EP700Y, Clone 36, NCL-L-E-cad [Clone 36B5], and ECH-6). We determined their biochemical specificity for the E-cadherin protein and IHC staining performance according to type and location of mutation on the CDH1 gene. Western blot analysis on mouse cell lines with conditional E-cadherin expression revealed a reduced specificity of EP700Y and NCL-L-E-cad for E-cadherin, with cross-reactivity of Clone 36 to P-cadherin. The use of IHC improved interpathologist agreement for ILC, lobular carcinoma in situ, and atypical lobular hyperplasia. The E-cadherin IHC staining pattern was associated with variant allele frequency and likelihood of nonsense-mediated RNA decay but not with the type or position of CDH1 mutations. Based on these results, we recommend the indication for E-cadherin staining, choice of antibodies, and their interpretation to standardize ILC diagnosis in current pathology practice.

Molecularly Confirmed Female Donor-Transmitted Lobular Breast Cancer to Male following Renal Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Lobular breast cancer represents 10%-15% of breast cancers in women but is virtually nonexistent in men, related to the typical absence of the anatomic breast lobule structure in male breast tissue. We describe donor-transmitted metastatic lobular carcinoma to a male after kidney transplantation. Determining whether a post-transplant cancer is transplant associated, donor transmitted, or donor derived is significant for treatment, prognosis, and possibly management of other organ recipients. CASE REPORT: A 74-year-old Caucasian male presented to the emergency department with lower abdominal pain and macro-hematuria. Past medical history included two renal transplantations. Computed tomography identified a 4-5-cm space-occupying lesion in the native left kidney. A left native nephrectomy was performed. Histology pathologic examination demonstrated lobular (as opposed to ductal) breast carcinoma. Fluorescent in situ hybridization probes to identify X- and Y-chromosomes showed tumor cells with an XX genotype, whereas the surrounding host cells were of XY genotype. These findings confirmed the female-sex origin (donor) of the tumor within the XY native male (current patient) tissues. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Due to discordance between the donor and recipient sex, fluorescent in situ hybridization as a molecular technique correctly identified the origin of an individual's cancer in the post-transplant setting. The metastatic breast cancer behaved more indolently than usually seen. Expanded criteria donors (ECD) are those who cannot donate under standard criteria for organ transplantation; expanded criteria widen the potential organ donor pool at the expense of increased risk for post-transplant complications (e.g., graft failure, the transmission of malignancy). The case provides a potential area of future research into considering allowing ECDs with a distant history of cancer with very low transmission risk when the biochemical environment of the recipient would, in the unlikely event of transmission, induce the tumor to pursue an indolent clinical course.

First diagnosed invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast combined with gastric metastasis and bone metastasis: a case report and review of the literature.

RATIONALE: Chinese women topped the list of new breast cancers, the first diagnosed gastric metastasis and bone metastasis is extremely infrequent. The clinical and pathological diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer is difficult. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the first diagnosis of breast cancer with both gastric metastasis and bone metastasis. CASE REPORT: The female patient was found to have abdominal distension for 15 days with nausea and vomiting. The patient underwent a gastroscopy at an outside hospital 4 days ago, showing: duodenal bulb changes, gastric retention and chronic non-atrophic gastritis. Gastroscopic biopsy showed chronic inflammation and edema of the duodenal mucosa with glandular hyperplasia. Conservative treatment was given with no relief of symptoms. She was seen in our hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery department. After admission, palliative surgery was performed, and the swelling and surrounding involved tissues were taken for examination during surgery. The rapid pathological return could not exclude tumor lesions, and the postoperative pathology confirmed the diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast with gastric metastases, and the systemic examination revealed combined bone metastases. DIAGNOSIS: Pathology and immunohistochemistry(IHC), a whole-body bone scan confirmed the first diagnosis of breast cancer with both gastric and bone metastases. INTERVENTIONS: Palliative treatment with bisphosphonates and CDK4/6i (Palbociclib) in combination with AI (Exemestane) was administered. OUTCOMES: The patient is currently under regular evaluation and is being followed up.

Current and future diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with invasive lobular breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer after invasive breast cancer of no special type (NST), representing up to 15% of all breast cancers. DESIGN: Latest data on ILC are presented, focusing on diagnosis, molecular make-up according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) guidelines, treatment in the early and metastatic setting and ILC-focused clinical trials. RESULTS: At the imaging level, magnetic resonance imaging-based and novel positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based techniques can overcome the limitations of currently used imaging techniques for diagnosing ILC. At the pathology level, E-cadherin immunohistochemistry could help improving inter-pathologist agreement. The majority of patients with ILC do not seem to benefit as much from (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy as patients with NST, although chemotherapy might be required in a subset of high-risk patients. No differences in treatment efficacy are seen for anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies in the adjuvant setting and cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in the metastatic setting. The clinical utility of the commercially available prognostic gene expression-based tests is unclear for patients with ILC. Several ESCAT alterations differ in frequency between ILC and NST. Germline BRCA1 and PALB2 alterations are less frequent in patients with ILC, while germline CDH1 (gene coding for E-cadherin) alterations are more frequent in patients with ILC. Somatic HER2 mutations are more frequent in ILC, especially in metastases (15% ILC versus 5% NST). A high tumour mutational burden, relevant for immune checkpoint inhibition, is more frequent in ILC metastases (16%) than in NST metastases (5%). Tumours with somatic inactivating CDH1 mutations may be vulnerable for treatment with ROS1 inhibitors, a concept currently investigated in early and metastatic ILC. CONCLUSION: ILC is a unique malignancy based on its pathological and biological features leading to differences in diagnosis as well as in treatment response, resistance and targets as compared to NST.

The 70-gene signature test as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Genomic expression assays provide prognostic information and guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Few studies have evaluated the utility of such assays for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). The objective of this study is to evaluate the 70-gene signature test (ST) as a prognostic and predictive tool for ILC using a national cancer database. METHODS: We identified patients diagnosed with stage I-III ER-positive ILC from 2004 to 2016 using the National Cancer Database. All patients underwent 70-gene ST testing. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard analyses to determine overall survival based on genomic risk classification. We also determined the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-genomic risk ILC based on 70-gene ST testing. RESULTS: We identified 2610 patients with ILC who underwent 70-gene ST testing; 280 (11%) were classified as high genomic risk. Five-year overall survival rates were significantly worse for patients classified as high risk (83%) as compared with those classified as low risk (94%, p < 0.05). In Cox models, high genomic risk was independently associated with a significantly increased hazard of death. In our Cox models of patients who were high genomic risk, adjuvant chemotherapy was not significantly associated with improved overall survival. CONCLUSION: In this large database study, we found that the genomic risk category determined by the 70-gene ST was significantly associated with survival outcomes for patients with ILC. However, the 70-gene ST failed to predict the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high genomic risk.

Avoiding "False Positive" and "False Negative" Immunohistochemical Results in Breast Pathology.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays an important role in the evaluation of breast pathology specimens to provide both diagnostic and prognostic/therapeutic information. Although most IHCs used in breast pathology can be easily interpreted, pitfalls do exist, especially in some uncommon scenarios. This review intends to focus on the challenging areas such as the interpretation of myoepithelial cell markers in differentiating benign proliferation and in situ carcinoma from invasive carcinoma, lobular cell markers in differentiating lobular from ductal carcinoma, cytokeratin and other markers in diagnosing metaplastic carcinoma, and breast tissue origin markers in diagnosing breast primary carcinoma. The challenges in interpreting prognostic and predictive markers will be also discussed.

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: the increasing importance of this special subtype.

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the most common of the breast cancer special types, accounting for up to 15% of all breast cancer cases. ILCs are noted for their lack of E-cadherin function, which underpins their characteristic discohesive growth pattern, with cells arranged in single file and dispersed throughout the stroma. Typically, tumours are luminal in molecular subtype, being oestrogen and progesterone receptor positive, and HER2 negative. Since last reviewing the lobular literature (McCart Reed et al., Breast Cancer Res 17:12, 2015), there has been a considerable increase in research output focused on this tumour type, including studies into the pathology and management of disease, a high-resolution definition of the genomic landscape of tumours as well as the evolution of several potential therapeutic avenues. There abounds a huge amount of new data, which we will review herein.

Problematic breast tumors reassessed in light of novel molecular data.

Breast cancer is a vastly heterogeneous disease encompassing a panoply of special histological subtypes. Although rare breast tumors have largely not been investigated systematically in large scale genomics series, recent studies have shed light on the genetic underpinnings of special histologic subtypes of breast cancer. Genomic analyses of estrogen receptor-positive special histologic types of breast cancer have not resulted in the identification of novel pathognomonic genetic alterations in addition to the confirmation of the presence of CDH1 loss-of-function mutations in invasive lobular carcinomas. By contrast, the analyses of triple-negative breast cancers have demonstrated that low-grade triple-negative breast cancers categorically differ from the common forms of high-grade triple-negative disease biologically and phenotypically and are underpinned by specific fusion genes or hotspot mutations. A subset of low-grade triple-negative disease has been shown to harbor highly recurrent if not pathognomonic genetic alterations, such as ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene in secretory carcinomas, the MYB-NFIB fusion gene, MYBL1 rearrangements or MYB gene amplification in adenoid cystic carcinomas, and HRAS Q61 hotspot mutations coupled with mutations in PI3K pathway genes in estrogen receptor-negative adenomyoepitheliomas. A subset of these pathognomonic genetic alterations (e.g., NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes) now constitute an FDA approved indication for the use of TRK inhibitors in the advanced/metastatic setting. These studies have also corroborated that salivary gland-like tumors of the breast, other than acinic cell carcinomas, harbor the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations detected in their salivary gland counterparts. Reassuringly, the systematic study of special histologic types of breast cancer utilizing state-of-the-art sequencing approaches, rather than rendering pathology obsolete, has actually strengthened the importance of breast cancer histologic typing and is providing additional ancillary markers for the diagnosis of these rare but fascinating entities.

Impact of RASSF1A gene methylation on clinico-pathological features of tumor and non-tumor tissue of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women caused by genetic and epigenetic changes. Promoter DNA methylation in tumor suppressor gene plays a major role in breast cancer. The study determined the association of promoter DNA methylation of RASSF1A gene with clinicopathological features in tumor and non-tumor tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida and Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences. Two sections, one from tumor and the other from non-tumor tissue, were obtained and processed for DNA extraction and bisulphite conversion. Methylation specific PCR was done and results of RASSF1A promoter methylation were statistically correlated with clinicopathological features. RESULTS: Of the 27 breast cancer tissue, 22 showed invasive ductal carcinoma, one showed invasive lobular carcinoma, another showed ductal carcinoma in situ and three cases showed malignant phyllodes tumor of breast. DNA promoter methylation was found in all the cases. 93% of tumor tissue samples and 67% of the non-tumor tissue samples were found to be aberrantly methylated. Tumor size and histological grade were found to be significantly (p-val <0.05) associated with the RASSF1A gene promoter methylation. CONCLUSION: A significant association of higher tumor size and tumor histological grade with promoter methylation of RASSF1A gene exists suggestive of its being an important determinant of prognostic staging. This critical event in tumorigenesis may be of clinical utility in assessing breast cancer progression. MICRO ABSTRACT: The study focuses on the RASSF1A gene promoter methylation and its impact on the clinicopathological features in Indian breast cancer patients highlighting the differences from other genetically different population. We found that RASFF1A gene methylation has significant impact on tumor size and tumor grade. The work carries high significance because it addresses the DNA methylation of tumor suppressor gene in relevance of breast cancer. It may also be the first such report on Indian patients with breast cancer.

PD-L1 diagnostics in the neoadjuvant setting: implications of intratumoral heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in triple negative breast cancer for assessment in small biopsies.

PURPOSE: PD-L1 expression is a predictive biomarker for anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the neoadjuvant setting, immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of PD-L1 expression can only be performed on small tissue biopsies. In our study we investigated heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in TNBC, and how reliably PD-L1 expression in small tissue samples reflects PD-L1 expression in larger tumor sections in TNBC. METHODS: Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed from surgical specimens of 110 patients with TNBC. TMAs contained 4 cores (1 mm in diameter) per patient. To evaluate PD-L1 expression, TMAs were stained with PD-L1 IHC 22C3 PharmDx. Single-core PD-L1 expression was compared to overall PD-L1 expression of each patient's tumor, to ascertain how often small samples of tumor tissue show the same PD-L1 expression as larger tumor samples. RESULTS: Our study found substantial heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression between different TMA cores from the same patient. Heterogeneity was greater in immune cells (ICs) than in tumor cells, in large part due to the uneven distribution of ICs in the tumor. For IC PD-L1 expression, we found that sensitivity can be as low as 0.81 for detecting PD-L1 expression at the 1% threshold most commonly used in breast cancer. Negative predictive value for ICs was 0.7. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression between small tissue samples from the same TNBC tumor, especially for IC expression. This poses challenges for evaluation of PD-L1 expression in the neoadjuvant setting. Negative biopsies should prompt further investigation, and multiple biopsies might be necessary.

Discrepancy between FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in the staging of patients with inflammatory breast cancer: implications for treatment planning.

PURPOSE: Optimizing treatment strategies for patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) relies on accurate initial staging. This study compared contrast-enhanced computed tomography (ce-CT) and FDG-PET/CT for initial staging of IBC to determine the frequency of discordance between the two imaging modalities and potential impact on management. METHODS: 81 patients with IBC underwent FDG-PET/CT and ce-CT prior to starting treatment. FDG-PET/CT and ce-CT scans were independently reviewed for locoregional and distant metastases and findings recorded by anatomic site as negative, equivocal, or positive for breast cancer involvement. Each paired ce-CT and FDG-PET/CT case was classified as concordant or discordant for findings. Discordant findings were subclassified as (a) related to the presence or absence of distant metastases; (b) affecting the locoregional radiation therapy plan; or (c) due to incidental findings not related to IBC. RESULTS: There were 47 discordant findings between ce-CT and FDG-PET/CT in 41 of 81 patients (50.6%). Thirty (63.8%) were related to the presence or absence of distant metastases; most commonly disease detection on FDG-PET/CT but not ce-CT (n = 12). FDG-PET/CT suggested alterations of the locoregional radiation therapy plan designed by CT alone in 15 patients. FDG-PET/CT correctly characterized 5 of 7 findings equivocal for metastatic IBC on ce-CT. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates differences between ce-CT and FDG-PET/CT for initial staging of IBC and how these differences potentially affect patient management. Preliminary data suggest that FDG-PET/CT may be the imaging modality of choice for initial staging of IBC. Prospective trials testing initial staging with FDG-PET/CT versus important clinical end-points in IBC are warranted.

The Tyrer-Cuzick Model Inaccurately Predicts Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in Women With LCIS.

BACKGROUND: The Tyrer-Cuzick model has been shown to overestimate risk in women with atypical hyperplasia, although its accuracy among women with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is unknown. We evaluated the accuracy of the Tyrer-Cuzick model for predicting invasive breast cancer (IBC) development among women with LCIS. METHODS: Women with LCIS participating in surveillance from 1987 to 2017 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Tyrer-Cuzick score (version 7) was calculated near the time of LCIS diagnosis. Patients with prior or concurrent breast cancer, a BRCA mutation, receiving chemoprevention, or with pleomorphic LCIS were excluded. Invasive cancer-free probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 1192 women with a median follow-up of 6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.5-9.9) were included. Median age at LCIS diagnosis was 49 years (IQR 45-55), 88% were white; 37% were postmenopausal, 28% had ≥ 1 first-degree family member with breast cancer, and 13% had ≥ 2 second-degree family members with breast cancer. In total, 128 patients developed an IBC; median age at diagnosis was 54 years (IQR 49-61). Five- and 10-year cumulative incidences of invasive cancer were 8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6-9%) and 14% (95% CI 12-17%), respectively. The median Tyrer-Cuzick 10-year risk score was 20.1 (IQR 17.4-24.3). Discrimination measured by the C-index was 0.493, confirming that the Tyrer-Cuzick model is not well calibrated in this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: The Tyrer-Cuzick model is not accurate and may overpredict IBC risk for women with LCIS, and therefore should not be used for breast cancer risk assessment in this high-risk population.

Internal Mammary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Clinically Axillary Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Diagnosis and Implications for Patient Management.

BACKGROUND: Routine performance of internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy (IM-SLNB) remains a subject of debate due to no clinical relevance in breast cancer, because it was performed only in clinically axillary lymph node (ALN)-negative patients. In this study, IM-SLNB was performed in clinically ALN-positive patients, and its impact on nodal staging and therapeutic strategy were subsequently analyzed. METHODS: Clinically ALN-positive patients who underwent IM-SLNB were enrolled in this prospective study. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi square test, Mann-Whitney U and logistic regression models with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Among the 352 recruited patients, the internal mammary sentinel lymph node (IMSLN) visualization rate of patients who received initial surgery and neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) was 71.9% (123/171) and 33.1% (60/181), respectively. The 183 patients who underwent IM-SLNB successfully had the average time duration of 7 min and the median IMSLN number of 2. There were 87 positive IMSLNs in all the 347 removed IMSLNs, which were mainly concentrated in the second (50.6%) and third (34.5%) intercostal space. The IMSLN metastasis rate was 39.8% (initial surgery) and 13.3% (NST), respectively. All of the 183 IM-SLNB patients received more accurate nodal staging, 57 of whom had stage elevated, which might have prompted modifications to the therapeutic strategy. CONCLUSIONS: IM-SLNB should be routinely performed in clinically ALN-positive patients, and thus more accurate nodal staging and perfect pathologic complete response definition could be put forward. The identification of IMLN metastases by IM-SLNB might potentially influence therapeutic strategies.

Use of bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with high risk of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is being performed increasingly for risk reduction in high-risk groups. There are limited data regarding complications and oncological outcomes in women undergoing bilateral prophylactic NSM. This study reviewed institutional experience with prophylactic NSM, and examined the indications, rates of postoperative complications, incidence of occult malignant disease and subsequent breast cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Women who had bilateral prophylactic NSM between 2000 and 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Rates of postoperative complications, incidental breast cancer, recurrence and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 192 women underwent 384 prophylactic NSMs. Indications included BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations in 117 patients (60·9 per cent), family history of breast cancer in 35 (18·2 per cent), lobular carcinoma in situ in 29 (15·1 per cent) and other reasons in 11 (5·7 per cent). Immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 191 patients. Of 384 NSMs, 116 breasts (30·2 per cent) had some evidence of skin necrosis at follow-up, which resolved spontaneously in most; only 24 breasts (6·3 per cent) required debridement. Overall, there was at least one complication in 129 breasts (33·6 per cent); 3·6 and 1·6 per cent had incidental findings of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer respectively. The nipple-areola complex was preserved entirely in 378 mastectomies. After a median follow-up of 36·8 months, there had been no deaths and no new breast cancer diagnoses. CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of prophylactic NSM in high-risk patients. The nipples could be preserved in the majority of patients, postoperative complication rates were low, and, with limited follow-up, there were no new breast cancers.

ANTECEDENTES: La mastectomía con preservación del pezón (nipple-sparing mastectomy, NSM) se realiza cada vez más para reducir riesgos en los grupos de pacientes de alto riesgo. Se dispone de pocos datos sobre complicaciones y resultados oncológicos en mujeres sometidas a NSM bilateral profiláctica. Este estudio revisó la experiencia institucional de la NSM profiláctica, y analizó las indicaciones, tasas de complicaciones postoperatorias, incidencia de enfermedad maligna oculta y diagnóstico de subsiguiente cáncer de mama. MÉTODOS: Se identificaron mujeres sometidas a NSM bilateral profiláctica durante el periodo 2000-2016 a partir de una base de datos prospectiva. Se evaluaron tasas de complicaciones postoperatorias, cáncer de mama incidental, recidiva y supervivencia global. RESULTADOS: Un total de 192 mujeres fueron sometidas a 384 NSMs profilácticas. Las indicaciones incluyeron mutaciones BRCA1 o BRCA2 en 117 (61%) pacientes, historia familiar de cáncer de mama en 35 (18%), carcinoma lobulillar in situ en 29 (15%) y otros motivos en 11 (5,7%). La reconstrucción mamaria inmediata se realizó en 191 pacientes. De las 384 NSMs, 116 (30%) presentaron alguna evidencia de necrosis de la piel durante el seguimiento y la mayoría se resolvieron de forma espontánea, con solo 24 (6,2%) mamas que requirieron desbridamiento. Globalmente hubo al menos una complicación en 129 (34%) mamas; 3,6% y 1,6% tuvieron hallazgos incidentales de carcinoma ductal in situ o cáncer de mama invasivo, respectivamente. El complejo areola-pezón se preservó completamente en 378 mastectomías. Tras una mediana de seguimiento de 36,8 meses, no hubo fallecimientos ni ningún diagnóstico nuevo de cáncer de mama. CONCLUSIÓN: Estos hallazgos apoyan la utilización de la NSM profiláctica en pacientes de alto riesgo. En la mayoría pacientes fue posible la preservación del pezón, las tasas de complicaciones postoperatorias fueron bajas y, con un seguimiento limitado, no hubo nuevos casos de cáncer de mama.

Lobular intraepithelial neoplasia: Outcomes and optimal management.

INTRODUCTION: Lobular neoplasia is a term encompassing both atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ. These pathological findings are of uncertain malignant potential and predispose to a higher lifetime risk of breast cancer. Debate surrounds the management of such lesions, with the rationale for diagnostic excision based on the possibility of upgrading to malignancy. In this study, we report the upgrade rate of these lesions and risk of subsequent development of breast cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained data base of all biopsies of breast screening-detected abnormalities in a single Irish breast-screening unit. We included all patients with lobular neoplasia on core needle biopsy who underwent diagnostic excision from 2005 to 2012. We excluded those who had concurrent high-risk lesions on biopsy. End points included upgrade rate and subsequent diagnosis of malignancy on follow-up. RESULTS: During the study period, 66 patients met criteria for inclusion, with a mean age of 53.74 years. Upgrade rate following excision was 13.64% (n = 9/66). Of those not upgraded, 7.02% (n = 4/57) were subsequently diagnosed with malignancy. Median time to diagnosis was 59.61 months (range = 10.5-124.4). CONCLUSION: There is a significant rate of upgrade following diagnostic excision of lobular neoplasia, supporting the practice of diagnostic excision. There is an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer for women with a diagnosis of lobular neoplasia, with many of these cancers occurring outside the standard five-year monitoring period, suggesting a potential benefit in extending surveillance.

American Registry of Pathology Expert Opinions: The Spectrum of Lobular Carcinoma in Situ: Diagnostic Features and Clinical Implications.

This review reflects a collaboration between the American Registry of Pathology (the publisher of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Fascicles) and Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. It is part of a series of expert recommendations on topics encountered in daily practice. The authors, 4 pathologists with expertise in breast pathology and a breast surgeon with a clinical and research interest in lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), met by conference call in September 2019 to develop recommendations for evaluating and reporting LCIS. Herein, we summarize the diagnostic criteria of classic LCIS and LCIS subtypes according to the most recent WHO criteria, discuss how best to distinguish LCIS from ductal carcinoma in situ in problematic cases (including the uses and limitations of E-cadherin immunohistochemistry), and review outcome and management issues for patients with LCIS.

Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Digital breast tomosynthesis is an advancement of mammography, and has the potential to overcome limitations of standard digital mammography. This study aimed to compare first-generation digital breast tomo-synthesis including two-dimensional (2D) synthetic mammograms versus digital mammography in a population-based screening programme. METHODS: BreastScreen Norway offers all women aged 50-69 years two-view (craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique) mammographic screening every 2 years and does independent double reading with consensus. We asked all 32 976 women who attended the programme in Bergen in 2016-17, to participate in this randomised, controlled trial with a parallel group design. A study-specific software was developed to allocate women to either digital breast tomosynthesis or digital mammography using a 1:1 simple randomisation method based on participants' unique national identity numbers. The interviewing radiographer did the randomisation by entering the number into the software. Randomisation was done after consent and was therefore concealed from both the women and the radiographer at the time of consent; the algorithm was not disclosed to radiographers during the recruitment period. All data needed for analyses were complete 12 months after the recruitment period ended. The primary outcome measure was screen-detected breast cancer, stratified by screening technique (ie, digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography). A log-binomial regression model was used to estimate the efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography, defined as the crude risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs for screen-detected breast cancer for women screened during the recruitment period. A per-protocol approach was used in the analyses. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02835625, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between, Jan 14, 2016, and Dec 31, 2017, 44 266 women were invited to the screening programme in Bergen, and 32 976 (74·5%) attended. After excluding women with breast implants and women who did not consent to participate, 29 453 (89·3%) were eligible for electronic randomisation. 14 734 women were allocated to digital breast tomosynthesis and 14 719 to digital mammography. After randomisation, women with a previous breast cancer were excluded (digital breast tomosynthesis group n=314, digital mammography group n=316), women with metastases from melanoma (digital breast tomosynthesis group n=1), and women who informed the radiographer about breast symptoms after providing consent (digital breast tomosynthesis group n=39, digital mammography group n=34). After exclusions, information from 28 749 women were included in the analyses (digital breast tomosynthesis group n=14 380, digital mammography group n=14 369). The proportion of screen-detected breast cancer among the screened women did not differ between the two groups (95 [0·66%, 0·53-0·79] of 14 380 vs 87 [0·61%, 0·48-0·73] of 14 369; RR 1·09, 95% CI 0·82-1·46; p=0·56). INTERPRETATION: This study indicated that digital breast tomosynthesis including synthetic 2D mammograms was not significantly different from standard digital mammography as a screening tool for the detection of breast cancer in a population-based screening programme. Economic analyses and follow-up studies on interval and consecutive round screen-detected breast cancers are needed to better understand the effect of digital breast tomosynthesis in population-based breast cancer screening. FUNDING: Cancer Registry of Norway, Department of Radiology at Haukeland University Hospital, University of Oslo, and Research Council of Norway.

Machine learning-based prediction of breast cancer growth rate in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Determining the rate of breast cancer (BC) growth in vivo, which can predict prognosis, has remained elusive despite its relevance for treatment, screening recommendations and medicolegal practice. We developed a model that predicts the rate of in vivo tumour growth using a unique study cohort of BC patients who had two serial mammograms wherein the tumour, visible in the diagnostic mammogram, was missed in the first screen. METHODS: A serial mammography-derived in vivo growth rate (SM-INVIGOR) index was developed using tumour volumes from two serial mammograms and time interval between measurements. We then developed a machine learning-based surrogate model called Surr-INVIGOR using routinely assessed biomarkers to predict in vivo rate of tumour growth and extend the utility of this approach to a larger patient population. Surr-INVIGOR was validated using an independent cohort. RESULTS: SM-INVIGOR stratified discovery cohort patients into fast-growing versus slow-growing tumour subgroups, wherein patients with fast-growing tumours experienced poorer BC-specific survival. Our clinically relevant Surr-INVIGOR stratified tumours in the discovery cohort and was concordant with SM-INVIGOR. In the validation cohort, Surr-INVIGOR uncovered significant survival differences between patients with fast-growing and slow-growing tumours. CONCLUSION: Our Surr-INVIGOR model predicts in vivo BC growth rate during the pre-diagnostic stage and offers several useful applications.

Mixed Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Prognosis and the Importance of Histologic Grade.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of mixed invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma (IDC-L) in clinical practice is often associated with uncertainty related to its prognosis and response to systemic therapies. With the increasing recognition of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) as a distinct disease subtype, questions surrounding IDC-L become even more relevant. In this study, we took advantage of a detailed clinical database to compare IDC-L and ILC regarding clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics, prognostic power of histologic grade, and survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 811 patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer with IDC-L or ILC. Descriptive statistics were performed to compare baseline clinicopathologic characteristics and treatments. Survival rates were subsequently analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Patients with ILC had more commonly multifocal disease, low to intermediate histologic grade, and HER2-negative disease. Histologic grade was prognostic for patients with IDC-L but had no significant discriminatory power in patients with ILC. Among postmenopausal women, those with IDC-L had significantly better outcomes when compared with those with ILC: disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.95). Finally, postmenopausal women treated with an aromatase inhibitor had more favorable DFS and OS than those treated with tamoxifen only (OS adjusted HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.87), which was similar for both histologic types (p = .212). CONCLUSION: IDC-L tumors have a better prognosis than ILC tumors, particularly among postmenopausal women. Histologic grade is an important prognostic factor in IDC-L but not in ILC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study compared mixed invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma (IDC-L) with invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) to assess the overall prognosis, the prognostic role of histologic grade, and response to systemic therapy. It was found that patients with IDC-L tumors have a better prognosis than ILC, particularly among postmenopausal women, which may impact follow-up strategies. Moreover, although histologic grade failed to stratify the risk of ILC, it showed an important prognostic power in IDC-L, thus highlighting its clinical utility to guide treatment decisions of IDC-L. Finally, the disease-free survival advantage of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen in ILC was consistent in IDC-L.

Exosomal protein CD82 as a diagnostic biomarker for precision medicine for breast cancer.

CD82, a member of the tetraspanin superfamily, has been proposed to exert its activity via tetra-transmembrane protein enriched microdomains (TEMs) in exosomes. The present study aimed to explore the potential of the exosome protein CD82 in diagnosing breast cancers of all stages and various histological subtypes in patients. The results strongly suggest that CD82 expression in breast cancer tissue was significantly lower than that in healthy and benign breast disease tissues. There was a significant negative correlation between CD82 expression in tissues and CD82 content in exosomes, which indicated that CD82 expression was redistributed from tissues to the blood with the development and metastasis of breast cancer.