Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Single and Multiple Intravenous Doses of Cefotetan Disodium in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Cefotetan is highly stable to penicillinase and cephalosporin produced by gram-negative bacteria, and it has strong antimicrobial activity against most gram-negative bacteria, some anaerobic bacteria and streptococcus. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile and tolerability of single and multiple intravenous doses of cefotetan disodium in healthy Chinese volunteers. METHODS: In this single-center, open-label, dose-escalating study, subjects were randomized to receive a single dose of cefotetan disodium 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 g administered as a 1 h intravenous infusion. After completion of the single-dose phase, subjects continued into the multiple-dose phase, in which they received 1.0 g cefotetan disodium BID for 7 consecutive days. Plasma samples were assayed by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and analyzed statistically. Tolerability was assessed based on physical examinations, vital signs, laboratory tests, and subject interviews. RESULTS: After intravenous administration of single doses of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g cefotetan disodium, the pharmacokinetics of cefotetan were as follows: Cmax was 69.49±12.10 µg·mL-1, 132.03±22.56 µg·mL-1 and 237.75±42.12 µg·mL-1, respectively; AUClast was 278.29±51.13 µg·mL-1·h, 543.25±92.44 µg·mL-1·h and 1003.8±172.39 µg·mL-1·h, respectively; AUC∞ was 284.42±50.76 µg·mL-1·h, 551.38±95.83 µg·mL-1·h and 1020.18±181.19 µg·mL-1·h, respectively; t1/2 was 4.21±0.83 h, 4.39±0.53 h and 4.27±0.74 h, respectively; CL was 1.81±0.33 L·h-1, 1.86±0.32 L·h-1 and 2.02±0.38 L·h-1, respectively; Vd was 10.80±1.89L, 11.78±2.20L and 12.25±1.99L, respectively. In the multiple-dose study, the pharmacokinetics of cefotetan were as follows: Cmax,ss was 147.58±22.71 µg·mL-1; Cmin,ss was 12.92±3.70 µg·mL-1; Cavg was 45.10±7.78 µg·mL-1; AUCτ,ss was 541.15±93.36 µg·mL-1·h; AUC∞ was 612.06±114.23 µg·mL-1·h; t1/2 was 4.30±0.63 h; CL was 1.90±0.35L·h-1; Vd was 8.91±1.57L; DF was 300.92±33.28%; Accumulation Index was 1.17±0.05. No serious adverse events were reported. Adverse events were generally mild. CONCLUSION: Cefotetan disodium showed favorable tolerability in this study. The Cmax and AUCs of cefotetan disodium demonstrated dose-dependent pharmacokinetic characteristics after single dose over a dose range (0.5-2.0 g) in healthy subjects, whereas the t1/2 was independent of dose. Except for Vd, there was no difference in other pharmacokinetic parameters between multiple and single administration.

Ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ertapenem, a long-acting carbapenem, may be an alternative to the recommended prophylactic antibiotic cefotetan. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis with ertapenem, as compared with cefotetan, in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. A successful outcome was defined as the absence of surgical-site infection, anastomotic leakage, or antibiotic use 4 weeks postoperatively. All adverse events were collected until 14 days after the administration of antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of the 1002 patients randomly assigned to study groups, 901 (451 in the ertapenem group and 450 in the cefotetan group) qualified for the modified intention-to-treat analysis, and 672 (338 in the ertapenem group and 334 in the cefotetan group) were included in the per-protocol analysis. After adjustment for strata, in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of overall prophylactic failure was 40.2% in the ertapenem group and 50.9% in the cefotetan group (absolute difference, -10.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -17.1 to -4.2); in the per-protocol analysis, the failure rate was 28.0% in the ertapenem group and 42.8% in the cefotetan group (absolute difference, -14.8%; 95% CI, -21.9 to -7.5). Both analyses fulfilled statistical criteria for the superiority of ertapenem. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the most common reason for failure of prophylaxis in both groups was surgical-site infection: 17.1% in the ertapenem group and 26.2% in the cefotetan group (absolute difference, -9.1; 95% CI, -14.4 to -3.7). In the treated population, the overall incidence of Clostridium difficile infection was 1.7% in the ertapenem group and 0.6% in the cefotetan group (P=0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Ertapenem is more effective than cefotetan in the prevention of surgical-site infection in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery but may be associated with an increase in C. difficile infection. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00090272 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Cefotetan-Induced Hemolytic Anemia: Case Series and Review.

PURPOSE: To raise awareness of cefotetan-induced hemolytic anemia, a known rare but serious side effect that occurred in 5 patients at our medical center. SUMMARY: Five cases of cefotetan-induced hemolytic anemia, which presented over the period of a single year at our center, are described. In each case, hemolytic anemia was confirmed by testing for the presence of anti-cefotetan antibodies. Each case occurred approximately 1 to 2 weeks following exposure to the drug. All five patients survived. A brief review of drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) is also discussed. CONCLUSION: DIIHA may be difficult to distinguish from other causes of hemolytic anemia, but should be included in the differential in patients exposed to medications associated with DIIHA. Once suspected, antibody testing should be performed, and once diagnosed, further exposure should be avoided.

Maternal anaphylactic shock in pregnancy: A case report.

RATIONALE: Anaphylaxis is a very rare event in pregnancy, triggering maternal hypotension leading to intrapartum hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in infant. Furthermore, cesarean sections are performed at a high rate in anaphylactic pregnant women. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 34-year-old pregnant woman presented with maternal anaphylaxis following prophylactic antibiotic injection for cesarean section. Within a few minutes after initiation of intradermal skin test with cefotetan, the pregnant woman developed generalized itchy rash, chest tightness, and dyspnea. DIAGNOSES: Several minutes after the injection of antibiotics, a diffuse urticarial rash was detected over her face and trunk followed by complaints of chest tightness and dyspnea. She was diagnosed with hypotension and hypoxia. Further, fetal heart tones showed bradycardia. A presumptive diagnosis of anaphylactic reaction induced by cefotetan was made for surgical prophylaxis. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was managed for anaphylaxis, via administration of epinephrine, glucocorticoid, and antihistamine. Emergency cesarean section performed under general anesthesia resulted in a favorable perinatal outcome for the fetus. OUTCOMES: Maternal and fetal outcomes were good after prompt treatment for anaphylaxis and emergency cesarean section. LESSONS: This is the first reported case of anaphylaxis following cefotetan administration in pregnancy. Cefotetan, a second-generation cephalosporin, is a commonly prescribed antibiotic used to treat a wide range of bacterial infections. The case demonstrated life-threatening anaphylactic reaction during pregnancy. Even a skin test using antibiotics alone triggered anaphylaxis.

Higher versus Lower Dose of Cefotetan or Cefoxitin for Surgical Prophylaxis in Patients Weighing One Hundred Twenty Kilograms or More.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines recommend a 2-g dose of cefotetan and cefoxitin for surgical prophylaxis. Pharmacokinetic data suggest benefit from higher cefotetan and cefoxitin dosing in obese patients. However, clinical studies examining higher dosing strategies in this at-risk population are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine whether 3 g of cefotetan or cefoxitin administered pre-operatively for patients who weigh 120 kg or more is associated with a lower proportion of surgical site infection (SSI) compared with 2 g. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients weighing 120 kg or more who had received cefotetan or cefoxitin (2 or 3 g) as surgical prophylaxis for intra-abdominal procedures between July 2012 and August 2015 were reviewed for the development of an SSI (primary outcome), study drug-related adverse events, and re-admissions attributed to SSIs (secondary outcomes). Relative risk calculations were performed for analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: One-hundred seventy-five procedures in 169 patients were included in the study. Cefotetan was used in 81% (141/175) of procedures. Three grams of cefotetan or cefoxitin was used in 20% (35/175) of procedures. The median body mass index (BMI) in both dosing groups was 42 kg/m2 and patients who received 3 g more often weighed more than 130 kg (relative risk [RR] 1.36, 1.01-1.76; p = 0.04). Surgical site infections occurred in 20.7% within the 2-g group and 22.9% in the 3-g group (RR 1.10, 0.55-2.20; p = 0.78). There was no difference in the number of study drug-related adverse effects in the 3-g compared with the 2-g group. Thirty-day re-admissions because of SSI also did not differ between the 2-g and 3-g groups (7.9% vs. 17.1%, respectively; p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: This small retrospective study did not find a difference in SSI rates between 3-g and 2-g surgical prophylaxis dosing for patients 120 kg or more with a median BMI >40 kg/m2.

Antibiotic treatment and associated prolonged prothrombin time.

The incidence and type of pathology causing a prolonged prothrombin time and clinical bleeding episodes were assessed in a multicentre study of 1109 patients receiving cefotetan, a N-methyl-thiotetrazole (NMTT), or equivalent antibiotics. There was no significant difference in the incidence of a prolonged prothrombin time (9.9% with cefotetan, 8.0% with comparable antibiotics) of clinical bleeding episodes. However, prothrombin time increases of greater than 12 seconds were significantly (p = 0.002) greater with cefotetan (3.8%) than with comparators (0.8%). In both antibiotic groups increases in prothrombin time were more likely following surgery and in patients who were older, with a high platelet count, low albumin, or higher urea and creatinine concentrations. All antibiotic treatment can be associated with prolonged prothrombin times and new agents should always be assessed in a large multicentre study before the practical, clinical importance of haemostatic defects can be defined.

Hypoprothrombinemia and hemorrhage in a surgical patient treated with cefotetan.

For 4 days before surgical repair of a diverticulitic colovesical fistula and for 6 days after, a 63-year-old man was treated with 2 g of intravenous cefotetan disodium every 12 hours for associated urosepsis with bacteremia. Postoperatively, the patient followed a diet of intravenous nutrition only. Uneventful convalescence was interrupted by signs of sudden major blood loss, accompanied by prolonged prothrombin time. After stabilization with packed red blood cells, fresh plasma, crystalloids, and parenteral vitamin K, laparotomy revealed a huge intra-abdominal clot, which was evacuated. This case illustrates the risk of unexpected hypoprothrombinemia and hemorrhage in a cefotetan-treated surgical patient who demonstrated none of the usual comorbid conditions generally described in patients with antibiotic-induced hypoprothrombinemia. Like cefamandole nafate, cefoperazone sodium, moxalactam disodium, and other cephalosporins containing the methylthiotetrazole side chain, cefotetan appears to pose an unusual risk of major bleeding.

Prospective alterations in therapy for penetrating abdominal trauma.

In a double-blind, randomized study, 170 patients with traumatic perforation of the gastrointestinal tract were administered an advanced-generation cephalosporin. Patients were divided into infection risk groups (< or = 40%, low; 40% to 70%, mid; and > 70%, high) at surgical closure using a logistic regression formula based on four proved risk factors--age, blood replacement, ostomy, and the number of organs injured. Patients in the low group received 2 days of antibiotic therapy; those in the mid to high group received 5 days of antibiotic therapy. Those patients in the low to mid group had primary wound closure; those in the high group had their wounds packed open and closed later. Most of the patients (144 [85%]) were in the low group. Their major and minor infection rates (10% and 12%, respectively) were not significantly different from 145 historic control subjects receiving 5 days of antibiotic therapy (9% major; 14% minor). Patients in the mid to high group showed a greater incidence of major infections (46%) but a similar incidence of minor infections (12%). The results indicate that risk factors can be used to identify low-risk patients who require only short-term antibiotic therapy and primary wound closure. The remaining patients are at greater risk for infection despite prolonged antibiotic therapy and delayed wound closure.

Absolute bioavailability and noncompartmental analysis of intravenous and intramuscular Cefotan (cefotetan) in normal volunteers.

Cefotetan (1 g) was administered to 12 normal volunteers as a 30 minute intravenous infusion and as an intramuscular injection. The pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental analysis. The mean +/- SD maximum plasma concentration, terminal half-life, and systemic clearance after intravenous infusion were 158 +/- 21 micrograms/mL, 4.54 +/- 1.05 hours, and 29.1 +/- 3.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Renal clearance and nonrenal clearance accounted for 63.1% and 36.9% of the systemic clearance, respectively. The mean +/- SD maximum plasma concentration, time to maximum concentration, terminal half-life, and absolute bioavailability after intramuscular injection were 75.5 +/- 8.7 micrograms/mL, 1.33 +/- 0.48 hours, 4.32 +/- 0.77 hours, and 0.931 +/- 0.193, respectively. Moment analysis gave average +/- SD mean residence times (MRT) of 4.98 +/- 0.75 and 5.86 +/- 0.77 hours after intravenous and intramuscular administration, respectively. The average +/- SD mean absorption time (MAT) after intramuscular injection was 1.11 +/- 0.57 hours. The mean +/- SD steady-state volume of distribution after intravenous infusion was 0.129 +/- 0.024 L/kg. The mean +/- SD cumulative percentage of the dose excreted in the urine in 24 hours were 61.1 +/- 11.4% and 50.4 +/- 13.5% after intravenous and intramuscular dosing, respectively. The maximum urinary cefotetan concentrations occurred during the first 2 hours after dosing by both routes of administration. Cefotetan tautomer was detected in the plasma and urine of all subjects after both routes of administration, but the mean concentrations were only minimal compared to those for cefotetan. In conclusion, intramuscular cefotetan (1 g) is rapidly and almost completely absorbed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A randomized prospective study to compare cefotetan with cefuroxime plus metronidazole as prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.

This study compares the efficacy of cefotetan with the combination of cefuroxime plus metronidazole as antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery when given over the first 24 h postoperatively. There was no significant difference in wound infection rates between the two groups (14.7% for cefotetan and 13.9% for cefuroxime plus metronidazole), or the rates of other infective complications. Adverse reactions occurred with equal frequency in both treatment groups and no serious side effects occurred. Cefotetan is a safe and effective antibiotic for use as prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. Its advantages are that it is a single agent with a spectrum covering both aerobic Gram-negative rods and anaerobic organisms and, because of its long half-life, needs only to be given at 12-hourly intervals.

Cutaneous drug reaction case reports: from the world literature.

Skin disorders are the most common adverse reactions attributed to drugs. Any skin disorder can be imitated, induced or aggravated by drugs. To help you keep up-to-date with the very latest skin reactions occurring with both new and established drugs, this section of the journal brings you information selected from the adverse drug reaction alerting service Reactions Weekly. The following case reports are selected from the very latest to be published in the world dermatology literature. Any claim of a first report has been verified by a search of AdisBase (a proprietary database of Adis International, Auckland, New Zealand) and Medline. Each case report is assessed for seriousness using the FDA MedWatch definition of serious (patient outcome is: death; life-threatening; hospitalization; disability; congenital anomaly; or requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage).

Cefotetan-induced hemolytic anemia: a case report and review of the literature.

Cefotetan disodium-induced hemolytic anemia has been reported previously, and some of these cases have been severe or fatal. We describe a case of severe hemolytic anemia that occurred in an 80-year-old woman who received cefotetan prophylactically after surgery for a small bowel obstruction. Eight days after the first dose of cefotetan, the patient developed a severe Coomb test-positive hemolytic anemia. Using flow cytometry, we demonstrated cefotetan-specific antibodies in her posttreatment serum, which were detectable at a serum dilution up to 1:10 000. The patient received corticosteroid therapy and blood transfusions, with improvement of her hematologic parameters, but died 54 days after admission for respiratory failure. To our knowledge, this is the first use of flow cytometry for the detection of cefotetan-induced red blood cell antibodies. This technique offers a sensitive, rapid, objective method for detecting drug-induced antibodies.

Efficacy and safety of cefotetan in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections: clinical experience in a selective and single study.

A single, selective study was performed in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefotetan in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (UTI). Of 34 pre-treatment isolated strains, 60% were pluri-resistant to other antibiotics (ampicillin, carbenicillin, piperacillin, cefalotin, aztreonam) but only 21.2% to cefotetan. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci were resistant to cefotetan. Escherichia coli was the common strain isolated (50%). Nineteen adult patients, with complicated UTI caused by sensitive organisms, were treated with a 1 g intramuscular (i.m.) daily dose. Duration of treatment ranged from 5-15 days, with a mean of 13.75 days. Within 24-48 h and 30 days post-therapy, the infection was cured in 84% and 52% of patients, respectively. Reinfection, relapse or super-infection occurred in 42% of the cases. In only one patient, the infecting organism did not respond to treatment. The clinical response was evaluated in only seven patients with symptomatic UTI. Six of them (85.7%) were cured after therapy and the cure persisted at follow-up. In most cases, the adverse reactions were local, mild and negligible. In only 15.8% and 10.5% of patients, side-effects (diarrhoea, headache, abdominal pain, tachycardia, chill, pain and erythema in the injection site) were severe and moderate. In these cases, the adverse reactions were reversible when the therapy was discontinued. The relationship between treatment and side-effects was doubtful in two cases. It is concluded that cefotetan, administered at 1 g i.m. daily dose, is effective in treating complicated UTI caused by sensitive organisms, pluri-resistant to other antibiotics.

Cefotetan-induced immune hemolytic anemia following prophylaxis for cesarean delivery.

Second- and third-generation cephalosporins, notably cefotetan, are increasingly implicated in severe, sometimes fatal immunemediated hemolytic anemia. We describe a 26-year-old woman who developed severe hemolytic anemia 2 weeks after receiving a single prophylactic dose of cefotetan during cesarean delivery. The patient's DAT was weakly reactive for IgG and her serum reacted with cefotetan-coated RBCs. The antibody had a titer of 4,096 by antiglobulin testing. The patient required treatment with two units of PRBCs and experienced gradual resolution of hemolysis. Our case emphasizes the need for increased awareness of delayed onset hemolytic anemia following prophylactic use of cefotetan.

[Peri-anesthesia allergies to antibiotics]. / Les allergies per-anesthésiques aux antibiotiques.

The author reports his personal experience of allergy to antibiotics following anaesthesia. Over a period of four years, corresponding to 5,500 patients who had consulted for reasons of allergy, 32 patients presented per-operative anaphylactic accident of which 5 were attributed to antibiotics (about 15%). Three of these accidents were attributed to cephalosporin, 1 to vancomycin and 1 to erythromicin.

[Effectiveness of cefotetan in clinical practice]. / Effektivnost' tsefotetana v klinicheskoi praktike.

Forty five patients at the age of 15 to 84 years with signs of infection requiring active antibacterial therapy were treated with cefotetan. In the majority of the patients pulmonary affections such as double pneumonia, pleurisy or bronchopneumonia were stated. In some patients bronchopulmonary pathological processes were associated with pancreatitis, cholecystitis or other diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. A separate group included patients with diseases of the small pelvis organs (pelvioperitonitis, metroendometritis or prostatitis) and diseases of the urogenital system (pyelonephritis) arachnoiditis. In all the patients except for one with bronchopneumonia at the background of chronic myeloleukemia and agranulocytosis the results of the treatment were good and satisfactory. Cefotetan proved to be efficient in the treatment of purulent affections of the skin and subcutaneous fat (abscesses and phlegmona), trophic disturbances at the background of pathological processes in the vessels and pyoseptic condition. Cefotetan practically had no side effects. Only in 2 patients insignificant nausea during the first 2 days of the treatment was recorded. In some patients the antibiotic intramuscular injections were painful with formation of cold infiltrates. After intravenous administration of cefotetan no adverse reactions were observed.

Immune hemolytic anemia caused by drugs.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) is a rare cytopenia; about 130 drugs have been incriminated. The antibodies causing DIIHA can be i) drug-independent (drug not needed to be present to detect antibodies in vitro)-DIIHA caused by this type of antibody presents clinically and serologically as an autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) with red cell (RBC) autoantibodies in patients' sera and in eluates from their RBCs; or (2) drug-dependent (antibodies react in vitro with RBCs only in the presence of drug, on the RBC membrane or when added to the patient's plasma and RBCs). AREAS COVERED: Literature is reviewed regarding pathophysiology of DIIHA (mechanisms; incidence of drugs involved; the clinical, hematological, and serological characteristics of the most common antibodies causing DIIHA). EXPERT OPINION: DIIHA is often poorly investigated and many reports do not provide data to support the diagnosis (i.e., no serology to support an immune etiology). The three most common drugs currently causing DIIHA are piperacillin, cefotetan, and ceftriaxone. All three (especially piperacillin) can cause in vitro and in vivo effects mimicking AIHA, and in transfused patients, hemolytic transfusion reactions. It is important to exclude DIIHA in such patients as the only treatment needed is to discontinue the drug.