Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 184
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Emerg Med J ; 37(3): 151-153, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31888954

RESUMEN

The practice of trepanning (referred to today as a craniotomy) dates back to the Neolithic period. Reasons for drilling a hole through the skull evolved from releasing evil spirits and curing insanity to practical management of head injuries in ancient Greece and Rome. Today, craniotomy or drilling a burr hole through the skull is very much the purview of the neurosurgeon. Yet one could argue that the procedure itself is more 'bone surgery' than 'brain surgery'. Nevertheless, despite the fact that head injury is a common presentation at district general hospitals and traumatic extra-axial haemorrhages are encountered often, the straightforward skillset required to drill a burr hole as a pretransfer, temporising, life-saving measure is seldom taught and has never gained traction. What we advocate in this article is the adaptation and novel application of an old, tried and tested technique in new hands. The critical pathophysiological turning point of any expanding extra-axial haemorrhage is the inflection point on the volume/Intracranial pressure (ICP) curve beyond which compensation is impossible. The subsequent rising ICP initiates a predictable continuum of clinical signs signalling progressive herniation. There are few emergencies as time-critical as a patient with an isolated, expanding extradural haemorrhage embarking on a trajectory of rostrocaudal deterioration and inevitable death. In many cases, the tragedy is compounded by the knowledge that such a patient probably has a healthy underlying brain, often evidenced by a lucid period after trauma. Our emergency department is attached to a small 300-bed District General Hospital (DGH) on the rural North West coast of Ireland. We are 262 km distant by road from a national neurosciences department that can, at best, be reached in 2 hours and 30 min. Quality improvement review of years of dismal outcomes in patients such as those described earlier with potentially remediable pathology prompted research and development of the skillset we are now able to offer, an old technique in new hands.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Craneotomía/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/fisiopatología , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/cirugía , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiología , Masculino , Cráneo/lesiones , Cráneo/fisiopatología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Neurocrit Care ; 31(3): 507-513, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31187434

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with one-third of all deaths from trauma. Preinjury exposure to cardiovascular drugs may affect TBI outcomes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) exacerbate brain cell damage and worsen functional outcomes in the laboratory setting. ß-blockers (BBs), however, appear to be associated with reduced mortality among patients with isolated TBI. OBJECTIVE: Examine the association between preinjury ACEI and BB use and clinical outcome among patients with isolated TBI. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients age ≥ 40 years admitted to an academic level 1 trauma center with isolated TBI between January 2010 and December 2014 was performed. Isolated TBI was defined as a head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score ≥ 3, with chest, abdomen, and extremity AIS scores ≤ 2. Preinjury medication use was determined through chart review. All patients with concurrent BB use were initially excluded. In-hospital mortality was the primary measured outcome. RESULTS: Over the 5-year study period, 600 patients were identified with isolated TBI who were naive to BB use. There was significantly higher mortality (P = .04) among patients who received ACEI before injury (10 of 96; 10%) than among those who did not (25 of 504; 5%). A multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed a threefold increased risk of mortality in the ACEI cohort (P < .001), which was even greater than the twofold increased risk of mortality associated with an Injury Severity Score ≥ 16. A second analysis that included patients who received preinjury BBs (n = 98) demonstrated slightly reduced mortality in the ACEI cohort with only a twofold increased risk in multivariate analysis (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Preinjury exposure to ACEIs is associated with an increase in mortality among patients with isolated TBI. This effect is ameliorated in patients who receive BBs, which provides evidence that this class of medications may provide a protective benefit.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Escala Resumida de Traumatismos , Adulto , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesión Axonal Difusa/epidemiología , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Hematoma Subdural/epidemiología , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Protectores , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Br J Neurosurg ; 33(1): 51-57, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30317874

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: According to the international guidelines, acute subdural hematomas (aSDH) with a thickness of >10 mm, or causing a midline shift of >5 mm, should be surgically evacuated. However, high mortality rates in older patients resulted in ongoing controversy whether elderly patients benefit from surgery. We identified predictors of outcome in a single-centre cohort of elderly patients undergoing surgical evacuation of aSDH or subacute subdural hematoma (saSDH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients aged ≥65 years undergoing surgical evacuation of aSDH/saSDH from 2000 to 2015. One-year outcome was dichotomized into favourable (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 4-5) and unfavourable (GOS 1-3). Predictors of outcome were identified by analysing patient characteristics. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients aged ≥65 years underwent craniotomy for aSDH/saSDH during the 16 year time period. Twenty-five percent regained functional independence, 11% survived severely disabled, and 64% died. Most patients died of respiratory failure following withdrawal of artificial respiration or following restriction of treatment. Age of the SDH or Glasgow Coma Scores ≤8/intubation did not predict unfavourable outcome. All patients with bilaterally absent pupillary light reflexes died, also those who still exhibited one normal-sized pupil. CONCLUSION: The low number of operated patients per year probably suggests that this cohort represents a selection of patients who were judged to have good chances of favouring from surgery. Functional independence at one-year follow-up was reached in 25% of patients, 64% died. Patients with bilaterally absent pupillary light reflexes did not benefit from surgery. The tendency to restrict treatment because of presumed poor prognosis may have acted as a self-fulfilling prophecy.


Asunto(s)
Hematoma Subdural/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Escala de Consecuencias de Glasgow , Hematoma Subdural Agudo/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Reflejo Pupilar/fisiología , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(2): 566-570, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31137454

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak frequently occurs after retrosigmoid craniectomy. The present study investigated the effects of cranioplasty using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement to reduce the incidence of CSF leak following retrosigmoid craniectomy as compared with the autologous bone flap combined with titanium plates. METHODS: Two hundred forty-three patients underwent surgeries via retrosigmoid approach for microvascular decompression or tumor resection. Of these, 107 patients underwent craniotomy, and incomplete cranioplasty was performed with autologous bone flap fixed with titanium plates, while 136 patients underwent craniectomy and complete cranioplasty was performed with PMMA cement. Variables including the incidence of CSF leak, pseudomeningocele formation, wound infection, rejection reaction were compared retrospectively based on the clinical data between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In the autologous bone group, 9 patients had postoperative CSF leaks, and 11 patients had pseudomeningoceles, while 3 CSF leaks and 2 pseudomeningoceles were found in the PMMA group. Statistical analysis showed that PMMA significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative CSF leaks (P = 0.03) and pseudomeningocele formation (P = 0.002). Wound infections were observed in 2 and 1 patients between the autologous bone and PMMA group, respectively, which did not differ significantly (P = 0.58). None of the patients in both groups developed a rejection reaction of artificial materials. CONCLUSIONS: Complete cranioplasty with PMMA cement following retrosigmoid craniectomy could decrease the incidence of CSF leak and pseudomeningocele formation as compared with the autologous bone flap combined with titanium plates. Thus, PMMA cement is preferable for bone reconstruction with excellent biocompatibility and without increasing the rate of wound infection.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo , Craneotomía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Polimetil Metacrilato/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/epidemiología , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/prevención & control , Estudios de Cohortes , Craneotomía/efectos adversos , Craneotomía/métodos , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Crit Care Med ; 46(8): 1302-1308, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29742589

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The postoperative management of patients who undergo brain tumor resection frequently occurs in an ICU. However, the routine admission of all patients to an ICU following surgery is controversial. This study seeks to identify the frequency with which patients undergoing elective supratentorial tumor resection require care, aside from frequent neurologic checks, that is specific to an ICU and to determine the frequency of new complications during ICU admission. Additionally, clinical predictors of ICU-specific care are identified, and a scoring system to discriminate patients most likely to require ICU-specific treatment is validated. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic neurosurgical center. PATIENTS: Two-hundred consecutive adult patients who underwent supratentorial brain tumor surgery. An additional 100 consecutive patients were used to validate the prediction score. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Univariate statistics and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify clinical characteristics associated with ICU-specific treatment. Eighteen patients (9%) received ICU-specific care, and 19 (9.5%) experienced new complications or underwent emergent imaging while in the ICU. Factors significantly associated with ICU-specific care included nonelective admission, preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale, and volume of IV fluids. A simple clinical scoring system that included Karnofsky Performance Status less than 70 (1 point), general endotracheal anesthesia (1 point), and any early postoperative complications (2 points) demonstrated excellent ability to discriminate patients who required ICU-specific care in both the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Less than 10% of patients required ICU-specific care following supratentorial tumor resection. A simple clinical scoring system may aid clinicians in stratifying the risk of requiring ICU care and could inform triage decisions when ICU bed availability is limited.


Asunto(s)
Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Supratentoriales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Estado de Ejecución de Karnofsky , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Gravedad del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
6.
J Neurooncol ; 136(1): 87-94, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28988350

RESUMEN

Hospital readmissions are a major contributor to increased health care costs and are associated with worse patient outcomes after neurosurgery. We used the newly released Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to describe the association between patient, hospital and payer factors with 30- and 90-day readmission following craniotomy for malignant brain tumor. All adult inpatients undergoing craniotomy for primary and secondary malignant brain tumors in the NRD from 2013 to 2014 were included. We identified all cause readmissions within 30- and 90-days following craniotomy for tumor, excluding scheduled chemotherapeutic procedures. We used univariate and multivariate models to identify patient, hospital and administrative factors associated with readmission. We identified 27,717 admissions for brain tumor craniotomy in 2013-2014, with 3343 (13.2%) 30-day and 5271 (25.7%) 90-day readmissions. In multivariate analysis, patients with Medicaid and Medicare were more likely to be readmitted at 30- and 90-days compared to privately insured patients. Patients with two or more comorbidities were more likely to be readmitted at 30- and 90-days, and patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities or home health care were associated with increased 90-day readmission rates. Finally, hospital procedural volume above the 75th percentile was associated with decreased 90-day readmission rates. Patients treated at high volume hospitals are less likely to be readmitted at 90-days. Insurance type, non-routine discharge and patient comorbidities are predictors of postoperative non-scheduled readmission. Further studies may elucidate potentially modifiable risk factors when attempting to improve outcomes and reduce cost associated with brain tumor surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/economía , Craneotomía/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Economía Hospitalaria , Humanos , Medicaid , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/economía , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Estados Unidos
7.
Headache ; 58(10): 1675-1679, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30334252

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report the trends in the use of common surgical interventions over the past decade to treat cranial nerve neuralgias. METHODS: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Part B National Summary Data File from 2000 to 2016 were studied. RESULTS: A total of 57.1 million persons were enrolled in 2016, up from 39.6 million persons in 2000. Suboccipital craniectomy done for cranial nerve decompressions (including cranial nerves V, VII, and IX) increased by 33.9 cases per year so that in 2016 the number of cases was 167% of what it was 17 years earlier (ie, from 655 cases in 2000 to 1096 cases in 2016). The less commonly used subtemporal approach craniectomy to treat trigeminal neuralgia (TN) increased by 1.13 cases per year (ie, from 25 cases in 2000 to 46 cases in 2016). The less invasive percutaneous rhizotomy procedures, including glycerol and radiofrequency ablation, for treatment of TN decreased by 42.9 cases per year (64%; ie, from 2578 cases in 2000 to 1206 cases in 2016). CONCLUSIONS: Overall trends show increased use of open surgery and decreased use of percutaneous rhizotomy, including destruction of the trigeminal nerve using balloon compression, glycerol injection, or thermal injury. These trends may be related to differences in outcomes between treatment modalities.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía para Descompresión Microvascular , Rizotomía , Neuralgia del Trigémino/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/estadística & datos numéricos , Ablación por Catéter/tendencias , Enfermedades de los Nervios Craneales/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Nervios Craneales/cirugía , Nervios Craneales/cirugía , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Craneotomía/tendencias , Bases de Datos Factuales , Glicerol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía para Descompresión Microvascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía para Descompresión Microvascular/tendencias , Neuralgia/epidemiología , Neuralgia/cirugía , Prevalencia , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas , Radiocirugia , Rizotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Rizotomía/tendencias , Nervio Trigémino/cirugía , Neuralgia del Trigémino/epidemiología , Estados Unidos
8.
Neurosurg Rev ; 41(4): 1037-1044, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29383600

RESUMEN

This aimed to evaluate the effect of surgery for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in intracranial primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) of all patients diagnosed at a single center. A prospective database at Oslo University Hospital of PCNSL was reviewed over a 12-year period (2003-2014). Seventy-nine patients with intracranial PCNSL were identified. Deep brain involvement was shown in 63 patients. Thirty-two patients underwent craniotomy with resection, while all other patients had a biopsy. Fifty-seven patients were given chemotherapy: 18 were treated with the MSKCC (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) with rituximab, 21 with the MSKCC without rituximab, and 14 within a Nordic prospective phase II protocol. Forty-four patients achieved complete response (CR) and had OS of 46.3 months. Patients who underwent resection had a median OS of 28.6 versus 11.7 months for those who had a biopsy performed. Resection showed an insignificant prolongation of OS. Multivariate analysis confirmed statistical significance of deep brain involvement only (p < 0.005). Neither chemotherapy regimen, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), type of surgery, nor patient age was significant factors for OS or PFS. Resective surgery played no role in significantly improving either OS or PFS and therefore it is not recommended as treatment for PCNSL.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Linfoma/terapia , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Biopsia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma/patología , Linfoma/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
Neurocrit Care ; 28(1): 35-42, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28808901

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients who have undergone intracranial neurosurgical procedures have traditionally been admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) for close postoperative neurological observation. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the evidence for routine ICU admission in patients undergoing intracranial neurosurgical procedures and to evaluate the safety of alternative postoperative pathways. METHODS: We were interested in identifying studies that examined selected patients who presented for elective, non-emergent intracranial surgery whose postoperative outcomes were compared as a function of ICU versus non-ICU admission. A systematic review was performed in July 2016 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist of the Medline database. The search strategy was created based on the following key words: "craniotomy," "neurosurgical procedure," and "intensive care unit." RESULTS: The nine articles that satisfied the inclusion criteria yielded a total of 2227 patients. Of these patients, 879 were observed in a non-ICU setting. The most frequent diagnoses were supratentorial brain tumors, followed by patients with cerebrovascular diseases and infratentorial brain tumors. Three percent (30/879) of the patients originally assigned to floor or intermediate care status were transferred to the ICU. The most frequently observed neurological complications leading to ICU transfer were delayed postoperative neurological recovery, seizures, worsening of neurological deficits, hemiparesis, and cranial nerves deficits. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review demonstrates that routine postoperative ICU admission may not benefit carefully selected patients who have undergone elective intracranial neurosurgical procedures. In addition, limiting routine ICU admission may result in significant cost savings.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/cirugía , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Craneotomía/economía , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/economía , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/economía
10.
J Craniofac Surg ; 29(7): 1755-1759, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30095569

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Limited cross-institutional studies compare strip craniectomy versus cranial vault remodeling (CVR) for craniosynostosis management. Given competing surgical preferences, the authors conducted a large-scale analysis of socioeconomic differences, costs, and complications between treatment options. METHODS: Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients receiving strip craniectomies or CVR were identified in the Kids' Inpatient Database for years 2000 to 2009. Demographics, socioeconomic background, hospital characteristics, charge, and outcomes were tabulated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for comparison. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one strip craniectomies and 1811 CVR patients were captured. Significantly more strip craniectomy patients were White while more CVR patients were Hispanic or Black (P < 0.0001). Strip craniectomy patients more often had private insurance and CVR patients had Medicaid (P < 0.0001). Over time, CVR trended toward treating a higher proportion of Hispanic and Medicaid patients (P = 0.036). Peri-operative charges associated with CVR were $27,962 more than strip craniectomies, and $11,001 after controlling for patient payer, income, bedsize, and length of stay (P < 0.0001). Strip craniectomies were performed more frequently in the West and Midwest, while CVR were more common in the South (P = 0.001). Length of stay was not significant. Postsurgical complications were largely equivocal; CVR was associated with increased accidental puncture (P = 0.025) and serum transfusion (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our national longitudinal comparison demonstrates widening socioeconomic disparities between strip craniectomy and CVR patients. Cranial vault remodeling is more commonly performed in underrepresented minorities and patients with Medicaid, while strip craniectomy is common in the White population and patients with private insurance. While hospital charges and complications were higher among CVR, differences were smaller than expected.


Asunto(s)
Craneosinostosis/cirugía , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/estadística & datos numéricos , Cráneo/cirugía , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Craneotomía/efectos adversos , Craneotomía/economía , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
Neurocirugia (Astur) ; 28(3): 103-110, 2017.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27751711

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) is a recently introduced tool in the most advanced neurosurgical operating rooms worldwide. We present our preliminary experience in brain tumour surgery with low field PoleStar N30® intraoperative MRI since its introduction in 2013 in the Barcelona Clinic Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective non-randomised study was conducted on cases operated on using iMRI and intention of complete removal up to October 2015. A record was made of the data as regards surgical times, resection rates, histological diagnosis, hospital stay, and survival rates during follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 50 patients, with a mean age of 55 years (±13.7), a preoperative mean Karnofsky of 92 (being 81 post-operatively), and a mean follow-up of 10.5 months (±6.5). There were 26% re-operations due to recurrence. High-grade gliomas were reported in 56%, low-grade gliomas in 24%, and 20% "Other" tumours. Overall hospital stay was 10 days (±4.5). Depending on the histologiacl diagnosis, the "Others" group had a longer hospital stay. Overall, there were 52% complete removal, 18% of maximum removals, and 30% of partial removals. The overall survival rates during follow-up was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: iMRI is a safe and effective tool for brain tumour surgery. Its use allows an increase in resection rates, and minimises post-operative complications. Its implementation involves an increase in surgical time, which improves with the characteristic learning curve. More studies are needed to establish its role in the long-term survival of patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Glioma/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neuronavegación/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Craneotomía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioma/mortalidad , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Cir Pediatr ; 30(1): 50-56, 2017 Jan 25.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28585791

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to gunshot-wounds (GSW) is a critical situation in the pediatric population. The aim of this study is to characterize TBI in this population since there are few reports that describe it especially in Colombia where its incidence is high, also to determine which were the main mortality predictor within our population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study in which we reviewed pediatric medical records of patients that had consulted at the Fundacion Valle del Lili pediatric Emergency Room between January of 2011 and December of 2015 because of TBI due to GSW. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: In our sample of 32 patients the average age was of 13.3 (SD ± 5.4) and with 75% male patients. In our sample the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at entry was less than 8 in 59.38%, a 15.6% needed craniotomy and 81.2% were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Death occurred in 43.75% of cases. The following mortality predictors were obtained: GCS at entry, pupillary exam and light reflexes, ISS, Marshal Score, absence of basal cisterns and presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage in CT scan, and APACHE II. CONCLUSIONS: TBI due to GSW is a devastating entity, especially in the pediatric population, they are responsible of high mortality and disability rates. There were no significant findings regarding infection rates and the use of surgery as a preventive method, therefore there's a chance it might not be indicated.


OBJETIVO: El traumatismo craneoencefálico (TCE) secundario a heridas por arma de fuego (HPAF) es una situación crítica, especialmente en la población pediátrica. El objetivo de este estudio es caracterizar el TCE en esta población dado que existen pocos reportes al respecto, especialmente en Colombia, y determinar cuáles fueron los principales predictores de mortalidad en nuestra población. MATERIALES Y METODOS: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo en el cual se revisaron historias clínicas pediátricas de aquellos pacientes que consultaron al servicio de urgencias de la Fundación Valle del Lili entre enero de 2011 y diciembre de 2015 por TCE debido a HPAF. Se ejecutó un análisis estadístico descriptivo con las variables a considerar. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvo una muestra de 32 pacientes con una edad promedio de 13,3 (SD ± 5,4) y de predominio masculino (75%). Se encontró que el Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) de ingreso < 8 se presentó en el 59,38% de los casos con un 15,6% que requirieron craniectomía y un 81,2% fue hospitalizado en Unidad de Cuidado Intensivo (UCI). El 43,75% fallecieron. Se obtuvieron los siguientes predictores de mortalidad: GCS de ingreso, examen y reflejos pupilares, ISS, Marshall Score, cisternas basales cerradas y presencia de hemorragia subaracnoidea en la tomografía axial computarizada y APACHE II. CONCLUSIONES: En la presente serie, no se encontró evidencia significativa entre los pacientes tratados quirúrgicamente o no, lo cual podría sugerir que un manejo conservador, individualizando cada caso, es una conducta aceptable y segura.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/etiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , APACHE , Adolescente , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Niño , Colombia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Hospitales Generales , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/epidemiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/terapia
13.
Med Sci Monit ; 22: 2431-8, 2016 Jul 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27404044

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND The purpose of the study was to analyze the risk factors for failed extubation in subjects submitted to infratentorial craniotomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients aged over 18 years who received infratentorial craniotomy for brain tumor resection were consecutively included in this study. Perioperative variables were collected and analyzed. Univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression were used to derive factors related to failed extubation. Patients had follow-up care until either out of hospital or death. RESULTS Throughout the course of the study, 2118 patients were eligible and 94 (4.4%) suffered from extubation failure at some point during their hospital stay. Five factors were recognized as independent risk factors for postoperative failed extubation: craniotomy history, preoperative lower cranial nerve dysfunction, tumor size, tumor position, and maximum change in blood pressure (BP) during the operation. Failed extubation was related to a higher incidence rate of pneumonia, mortality, unfavorable Glasgow Outcome Scale score, longer stay in the neuro-intensive care unit (ICU) and hospitalization, and higher hospitalization costs compared with successful extubation. CONCLUSIONS History of craniotomy, preoperative lower cranial nerve dysfunction, tumor size, tumor position, and maximum change in BP during the operation were independent risk factors related to postoperative failed extubation in patients submitted to infratentorial craniotomy. Extubation failure raises the incidences of postoperative pneumonia, mortality, and higher hospitalization costs, and prolongs neuro-ICU and postoperative length of stay.


Asunto(s)
Extubación Traqueal/métodos , Craneotomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Extubación Traqueal/mortalidad , Extubación Traqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , China/epidemiología , Craneotomía/efectos adversos , Craneotomía/mortalidad , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Infratentoriales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Infratentoriales/cirugía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
14.
Can J Anaesth ; 63(11): 1245-57, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27510463

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery is a multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to achieve early discharge in patients undergoing major surgery. Recent advances in neurosurgery allow for shorter duration of anesthesia and surgery, faster recovery, and earlier discharge from hospital. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to assess the incidence of early discharge from hospital in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumours as well as to explore the associated perioperative factors, anesthesia techniques, and complications. METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent craniotomy (less than four-hour duration) for supratentorial tumour over a five-year period were retrospectively reviewed. The data analyzed included the postoperative discharge destination, type of anesthesia-i.e., general anesthesia (GA) vs awake craniotomy (AC), and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Data from 329 patients [mean (SD) age 48 (12) yr; 164 male, 165 female] were analyzed, including 198 (AC, n = 157; GA, n = 41) patients who were preoperatively scheduled for same-day discharge. Successful same-day discharge occurred in 175/198 (88.4%) of these patients (AC, n = 139; GA, n = 36). Five (2.9%) of the 175 patients (4 AC, 1 GA) with same-day discharge required readmission to hospital within the first 12 hr after discharge. Six (1.8%) of the 329 total patients had a documented postoperative intracranial bleed, but none occurred after initial discharge from hospital. CONCLUSION: Same-day discharge from hospital is possible in carefully selected patients after both GA and AC for supratentorial tumour surgery.


Asunto(s)
Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Supratentoriales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anestesia General , Craneotomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Paciente , Atención Perioperativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vigilia
15.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 26(2): 199-206, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26573702

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several clinical and surgical factors can influence the occurrence of allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) during oncologic neurosurgery. OBJECTIVES: To identify the potential predictive factors of ABT during craniotomy for the removal of brain tumors in children and the potential impact of intraoperative ABT on early postoperative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in all pediatric patients younger than 18 years who underwent craniotomy for brain tumor removal from December 2009 to December 2012 in our institution. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were collected from medical and stored electronic anesthesia records. The predictors of intraoperative ABT were determined using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included. Twenty-seven patients (25%) received intraoperative ABT with a volume of 16 ± 8 ml·kg(-1) . On multivariate analysis, an age <4 years, a duration of surgery >270 min, and a preoperative hemoglobin <12.2 g·dl(-1) were independently associated with the need for intraoperative ABT. We did not show any significant difference concerning postoperative early outcome and length of stay between the transfused and non-transfused patients except for the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation that was significantly higher in the transfused group (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In children, craniotomy for brain tumor removal is at risk of intraoperative ABT. An age <4 years, a duration of surgery >270 min, and a preoperative hemoglobin <12.2 g·dl(-1) are the main factors associated with intraoperative ABT during this surgery.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión de Sangre Autóloga/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Encéfalo/cirugía , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
16.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 25(2): 186-92, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25251293

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few human cohort studies on anesthesia-related neurotoxicity and the developing brain have focused on and compared specific surgeries and conditions. These studies cannot disentangle the effects of anesthesia from those of the surgery and underlying conditions. This study aimed at assessing the impact of specific neurosurgical conditions and procedures in infancy on mortality and academic achievements in adolescence. METHODS: A nationwide unselected register-based follow-up study of the Danish birth cohorts 1986-1990 compared academic performances of all children having undergone neurosurgeries as infants with a randomly selected, age-matched 5% sample of the same cohorts. The two groups were compared regarding mortality prior to June 1st, 2006, average test scores at ninth grade, and finally the proportion of children not attaining test scores. RESULTS: The exposure group comprised 228 and the control group 14 698 individuals. Hydrocephalus (n = 130), craniotomy (n = 43), and myelomeningocele/encephalocele children (n = 55) had a higher mortality (18.5.0%, 18.6%, and 7.3%, respectively) vs controls (1.3%; P < 0.00001, P < 0.00001, and P = 0.0052, respectively). Average test scores were significantly lower than controls in hydrocephalus and craniotomy (P = 0.0043 and P = 0.0077) but not myelomeningocele/encephalocele children (P = 0.2785); the proportion of available test scores were significantly lower in all three groups (40.8%, 60.0%, and 67.3%, respectively) vs 86.8% in controls (P < 0.00001, P = 0.000077, and P = 0.000064). CONCLUSION: Neurosurgery in infancy was associated with high mortality and significantly impaired academic achievements in adolescence. When studying anesthesia-related neurotoxicity and the developing brain, focus on specific surgeries/conditions is important. Pooling of major/minor conditions and major/minor surgeries should be avoided.


Asunto(s)
Logro , Evaluación Educacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Estudios de Cohortes , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hidrocefalia , Lactante , Masculino , Meningomielocele
17.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 157(2): 275-80, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25534126

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reimplantation of cryoconserved autologous bone flaps is a standard procedure after decompressive craniotomies. Aseptic necrosis and resorption are the most frequent complications of this procedure. At present there is no consensus regarding the definition of the relevant extent and indication for surgical revision. The objective of this retrospective analysis was to identify the incidence of bone flap resorption and the optimal duration of follow-up. METHODS: Between February 2009 and March 2012, 100 cryoconserved autologous bone flaps were reimplanted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital Bern. Three patients were not available for follow-up, and five patients died before follow-up. All patients underwent follow-up at 6 weeks and a second follow-up more than 12 months postoperatively. A clinical and CT-based score was developed for judgment of relevance and decision making for surgical revision. RESULTS: Mean follow-up period was 21.6 months postoperatively (range: 12 to 47 months); 48.9 % (45/92) of patients showed no signs of bone flap resorption, 20.7 % (19/92) showed minor resorption with no need for surgical revision, and 30.4 % (28/92) showed major resorption (in 4 % of these the bone flap was unstable or collapsed). CONCLUSIONS: Aseptic necrosis and resorption of reimplanted autologous bone flaps occurred more frequently in our series of patients than in most reports in the literature. Most cases were identified between 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Clinical observation or CT scans of patients with autologous bone flaps are recommended for at least 12 months. Patient-specific implants may be preferable to autologous bone flaps.


Asunto(s)
Resorción Ósea/epidemiología , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Reimplantación/estadística & datos numéricos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Lancet ; 382(9890): 397-408, 2013 Aug 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23726393

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The balance of risk and benefit from early neurosurgical intervention for conscious patients with superficial lobar intracerebral haemorrhage of 10-100 mL and no intraventricular haemorrhage admitted within 48 h of ictus is unclear. We therefore tested the hypothesis that early surgery compared with initial conservative treatment could improve outcome in these patients. METHODS: In this international, parallel-group trial undertaken in 78 centres in 27 countries, we compared early surgical haematoma evacuation within 12 h of randomisation plus medical treatment with initial medical treatment alone (later evacuation was allowed if judged necessary). An automatic telephone and internet-based randomisation service was used to assign patients to surgery and initial conservative treatment in a 1:1 ratio. The trial was not masked. The primary outcome was a prognosis-based dichotomised (favourable or unfavourable) outcome of the 8 point Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) obtained by questionnaires posted to patients at 6 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN22153967. FINDINGS: 307 of 601 patients were randomly assigned to early surgery and 294 to initial conservative treatment; 298 and 291 were followed up at 6 months, respectively; and 297 and 286 were included in the analysis, respectively. 174 (59%) of 297 patients in the early surgery group had an unfavourable outcome versus 178 (62%) of 286 patients in the initial conservative treatment group (absolute difference 3·7% [95% CI -4·3 to 11·6], odds ratio 0·86 [0·62 to 1·20]; p=0·367). INTERPRETATION: The STICH II results confirm that early surgery does not increase the rate of death or disability at 6 months and might have a small but clinically relevant survival advantage for patients with spontaneous superficial intracerebral haemorrhage without intraventricular haemorrhage. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Cerebral/terapia , Hematoma/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hemorragia Cerebral/mortalidad , Hemorragia Cerebral/cirugía , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Personas con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Hematoma/mortalidad , Hematoma/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
19.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 24(7): 781-7, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24467608

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is very few information regarding pain after craniotomy in children. OBJECTIVES: This multicentre observational study assessed the incidence of pain after major craniotomy in children. METHODS: After IRB approval, 213 infants and children who were <10 years old and undergoing major craniotomy were consecutively enrolled in nine Italian hospitals. Pain intensity, analgesic therapy, and adverse effects were evaluated on the first 2 days after surgery. Moderate to severe pain was defined as a median FLACC or NRS score ≥ 4 points. Severe pain was defined as a median FLACC or NRS score ≥ 7 points. RESULTS: Data of 206 children were included in the analysis. The overall postoperative median FLACC/NRS scores were 1 (IQR 0 to 2). Twenty-one children (16%) presented moderate to severe pain in the recovery room and 14 (6%) during the first and second day after surgery. Twenty-six children (19%) had severe pain in the recovery room and 4 (2%) during the first and second day after surgery. Rectal codeine was the most common weak opiod used. Remifentanil and morphine were the strong opioids widely used in PICU and in general wards, respectively. Longer procedures were associated with moderate to severe pain (OR 1.30; CI 1.07-1.57) or severe pain (OR 1.41; 1.09-1.84; P < 0.05). There were no significant associations between complications, pain intensity, and analgesic therapy. CONCLUSION: Children receiving multimodal analgesia experience little or no pain after major craniotomy. Longer surgical procedures correlate with an increased risk of having postoperative pain.


Asunto(s)
Craneotomía/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo
20.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 156(5): 869-77, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24682633

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Unplanned re-exploration of the craniotomy after surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is sometimes required, but the underlying causes and rates of these procedures are seldom reported. This study retrospectively analyzed the causes of such re-explorations to identify methods for decreasing their necessity. METHOD: From January 2000 to December 2011, 1,720 patients with a total of 1,938 UIAs underwent surgical treatment at our institution. From this cohort, 26 patients (1.5 %) with 38 UIAs required re-exploration. Clinical data, aneurysm characteristics, treatment methods, and the incidence and causes of re-exploration of the craniotomy were analyzed for these 26 patients. RESULTS: Several causes of re-exploration were identified: compromised distal blood flow (eight patients, 0.47 %), hemorrhagic venous infarction (four patients, 0.23 %), brain retraction injury (three patients, 0.17 %), newly identified aneurysms (three patients, 0.17 %), bleeding from an incompletely clipped aneurysm (two patients, 0.12 %), epidural hematoma (two patients, 0.12 %), failed aneurysm clipping (two patients, 0.12 %) and other causes (two patients, 0.12 %). Annual re-exploration incidence rates ranged from 0 to 3.1 %. Annual incidence rates gradually decreased following the introduction of several intraoperative monitoring systems. CONCLUSIONS: Precise surgical planning and careful operative techniques can reduce the incidence of unplanned re-exploration of the craniotomy. The introduction of various intraoperative monitoring systems can also contribute to a reduction in this incidence.


Asunto(s)
Craneotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Aneurisma Intracraneal/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda