Momelotinib versus danazol in symptomatic patients with anaemia and myelofibrosis (MOMENTUM): results from an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved for myelofibrosis provide spleen and symptom improvements but do not meaningfully improve anaemia. Momelotinib, a first-in-class inhibitor of activin A receptor type 1 as well as JAK1 and JAK2, has shown symptom, spleen, and anaemia benefits in myelofibrosis. We aimed to confirm the differentiated clinical benefits of momelotinib versus the active comparator danazol in JAK-inhibitor-exposed, symptomatic patients with anaemia and intermediate-risk or high-risk myelofibrosis. METHODS: MOMENTUM is an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study that enrolled patients at 107 sites across 21 countries worldwide. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis or post-polycythaemia vera or post-essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive momelotinib (200 mg orally once per day) plus danazol placebo (ie, the momelotinib group) or danazol (300 mg orally twice per day) plus momelotinib placebo (ie, the danazol group), stratified by total symptom score (TSS; <22 vs ≥22), spleen size (<12 cm vs ≥12 cm), red blood cell or whole blood units transfused in the 8 weeks before randomisation (0 units vs 1-4 units vs ≥5 units), and study site. The primary endpoint was the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) TSS response rate at week 24 (defined as ≥50% reduction in mean MFSAF TSS over the 28 days immediately before the end of week 24 compared with baseline). MOMENTUM is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04173494, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: 195 patients were randomly assigned to either the momelotinib group (130 [67%]) or danazol group (65 [33%]) and received study treatment in the 24-week randomised treatment period between April 24, 2020, and Dec 3, 2021. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the momelotinib group reported a 50% or more reduction in TSS than in the danazol group (32 [25%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65; proportion difference 16% [95% CI 6-26], p=0·0095). The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were haematological abnormalities by laboratory values: anaemia (79 [61%] of 130 vs 49 [75%] of 65) and thrombocytopenia (36 [28%] vs 17 [26%]). The most frequent non-haematological grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were acute kidney injury (four [3%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65) and pneumonia (three [2%] vs six [9%]). INTERPRETATION: Treatment with momelotinib, compared with danazol, resulted in clinically significant improvements in myelofibrosis-associated symptoms, anaemia measures, and spleen response, with favourable safety. These findings support the future use of momelotinib as an effective treatment in patients with myelofibrosis, especially in those with anaemia. FUNDING: Sierra Oncology.

Tacrolimus prevents complement-mediated Nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation and pyroptosis of mesenchymal stem cells from immune thrombocytopenia.

The abnormal immunomodulatory functions of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been implicated in the development of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Recent studies have suggested important effects of complement on immune cell function. However, whether complement modulates bone marrow MSCs function in ITP is poorly defined. Tacrolimus has recently been applied to the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Here, we explored whether impaired ITP-MSCs could be targeted by tacrolimus. Our results showed that the Nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome was activated in ITP MSCs with complement deposition (MSCs-C+ ) and initiated caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis. Transcriptome sequencing results showed abnormal fatty acid metabolism in MSCs-C+ . Enhanced fatty acid ß-oxidation and reactive oxygen species production activated the NLRP3 inflammasome. Adipocytes derived from MSCs-C+ secreted less adiponectin. Adiponectin promoted the differentiation of megakaryocytes and inhibited the destruction of platelets. Tacrolimus inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome activation and MSCs-C+ pyroptosis in vitro and in vivo. Tacrolimus plus danazol elicited a higher sustained response than danazol monotherapy in corticosteroid-resistant patients with ITP. Our findings demonstrate that the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in ITP MSCs mediated by complement could be inhibited by tacrolimus, which might be a potential new therapy for ITP.

A combined ligand and target-based virtual screening strategy to repurpose drugs as putrescine uptake inhibitors with trypanocidal activity.

Chagas disease, also known as American trypanosomiasis, is a neglected tropical disease caused by the protozoa Trypanosoma cruzi, affecting nearly 7 million people only in the Americas. Polyamines are essential compounds for parasite growth, survival, and differentiation. However, because trypanosomatids are auxotrophic for polyamines, they must be obtained from the host by specific transporters. In this investigation, an ensemble of QSAR classifiers able to identify polyamine analogs with trypanocidal activity was developed. Then, a multi-template homology model of the dimeric polyamine transporter of T. cruzi, TcPAT12, was created with Rosetta, and then refined by enhanced sampling molecular dynamics simulations. Using representative snapshots extracted from the trajectory, a docking model able to discriminate between active and inactive compounds was developed and validated. Both models were applied in a parallel virtual screening campaign to repurpose known drugs as anti-trypanosomal compounds inhibiting polyamine transport in T. cruzi. Montelukast, Quinestrol, Danazol, and Dutasteride were selected for in vitro testing, and all of them inhibited putrescine uptake in biochemical assays, confirming the predictive ability of the computational models. Furthermore, all the confirmed hits proved to inhibit epimastigote proliferation, and Quinestrol and Danazol were able to inhibit, in the low micromolar range, the viability of trypomastigotes and the intracellular growth of amastigotes.

Danazol for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Systematic Review.

Purpose To study the potential utility of danazol for treating patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, with a focus on efficacy and adverse effects (AEs). Methods MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus were searched for relevant publications from inception June 1, 1950, until June 28, 2022. The studies were screened by title and abstract, followed by full-text screening. The quality of the included studies was assessed via a prespecified set of questionnaires. Data on the efficacy measures and adverse outcomes were extracted and included in a descriptive summary. Results Nine studies consisting of 246 participants were included in our review. The overall quality of the included studies was fair. The age of the participants ranged from 61 to 78 years. In all 9 studies, more male patients had been enrolled than female patients. Overall, a proportion of patients in all the studies reported a desired major response to a danazol dose of 400 to 800 mg/day. Few studies did not observe any improvement in the platelet count. Elevated liver enzyme levels, weight gain, headache, dermatitis, and weakness were the most common AEs observed. One study reported a fatal intracerebral hemorrhage in 1 participant. Conclusions Danazol has been effective in increasing platelet count and hemoglobin level. Despite a few AEs, danazol is a safe drug for the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition affecting 6 to 11% of reproductive-age women and may cause dyspareunia, dysmenorrhoea, and infertility. One treatment strategy is medical therapy with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHas) to reduce pain due to endometriosis. One of the adverse effects of GnRHas is a decreased bone mineral density. In addition to assessing the effect on pain, quality of life, most troublesome symptom and patients' satisfaction, the current review also evaluated the effect on bone mineral density and risk of adverse effects in women with endometriosis who use GnRHas versus other treatment options. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of GnRH analogues (GnRHas) in the treatment of painful symptoms associated with endometriosis and to determine the effects of GnRHas on bone mineral density of women with endometriosis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the trial registries in May 2022 together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared GnRHas with other hormonal treatment options, including analgesics, danazol, intra-uterine progestogens, oral or injectable progestogens, gestrinone and also GnRHas compared with no treatment or placebo. Trials comparing GnRHas versus GnRHas in conjunction with add-back therapy (hormonal or non-hormonal) or calcium-regulation agents were also included in this review.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodology as recommended by Cochrane. Primary outcomes are relief of overall pain and the objective measurement of bone mineral density. Secondary outcomes include adverse effects, quality of life, improvement in the most troublesome symptoms and patient satisfaction.  Due to high risk of bias associated with some of the studies, primary analyses of all review outcomes were restricted to studies at low risk of selection bias. Sensitivity analysis including all studies was then performed. MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-two studies involving 7355 patients were included. The evidence was very low to low quality: the main limitations of all studies were serious risk of bias due to poor reporting of study methods, and serious imprecision.  Trials comparing GnRHas versus no treatment  We did not identify any studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus placebo There may be a decrease in overall pain, reported as pelvic pain scores (RR 2.14; 95% CI 1.41 to 3.24, 1 RCT, n = 87, low-certainty evidence), dysmenorrhoea scores (RR 2.25; 95% CI 1.59 to 3.16, 1 RCT, n = 85, low-certainty evidence), dyspareunia scores (RR 2.21; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.54, 1 RCT, n = 59, low-certainty evidence), and pelvic tenderness scores (RR 2.28; 95% CI 1.48 to 3.50, 1 RCT, n = 85, low-certainty evidence) after three months of treatment. We are uncertain of the effect for pelvic induration, based on the results found after three months of treatment (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.79, 1 RCT, n = 81, low-certainty evidence). Besides, treatment with GnRHas may be associated with a greater incidence of hot flushes at three months of treatment (RR 3.08; 95% CI 1.89 to 5.01, 1 RCT, n = 100, low-certainty evidence). Trials comparing GnRHas versus danazol For overall pain, for women treated with either GnRHas or danazol, a subdivision was made between pelvic tenderness, partly resolved and completely resolved. We are uncertain about the effect on relief of overall pain, when a subdivision was made for overall pain (MD -0.30; 95% CI -1.66 to 1.06, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), pelvic pain (MD 0.20; 95% CI -0.26 to 0.66, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), dysmenorrhoea (MD 0.10; 95% CI -0.49 to 0.69, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), dyspareunia (MD -0.20; 95% CI -0.77 to 0.37, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), pelvic induration (MD -0.10; 95% CI -0.59 to 0.39, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), and pelvic tenderness (MD -0.20; 95% CI -0.78 to 0.38, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) after three months of treatment. For pelvic pain (MD 0.50; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.90, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) and pelvic induration (MD 0.70; 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence), the complaints may decrease slightly after treatment with GnRHas, compared to danazol, for six months of treatment. Trials comparing GnRHas versus analgesics  We did not identify any studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus intra-uterine progestogens We did not identify any low risk of bias studies. Trials comparing GnRHas versus GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents There may be a slight decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) after 12 months treatment with GnRHas, compared to GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents for anterior-posterior spine (MD -7.00; 95% CI -7.53 to -6.47, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence) and lateral spine (MD -12.40; 95% CI -13.31 to -11.49, 1 RCT, n = 41, very low-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For relief of overall pain, there may be a slight decrease in favour of treatment with GnRHas compared to placebo or oral or injectable progestogens. We are uncertain about the effect when comparing GnRHas with danazol, intra-uterine progestogens or gestrinone. For BMD, there may be a slight decrease when women are treated with GnRHas, compared to gestrinone. There was a bigger decrease of BMD in favour of GnRHas, compared to GnRHas in conjunction with calcium-regulating agents. However, there may be a slight increase in adverse effects when women are treated with GnRHas, compared to placebo or gestrinone. Due to a very low to low certainty of the evidence, a wide range of outcome measures and a wide range of outcome measurement instruments, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Rare Pattern of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) with Serum Monoclonal Immunoglobulin: Case Report.

Background: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by bone marrow dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, and cytopenias. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and multiple myeloma (MM) patients have a high risk of secondary MDS or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) compared to healthy persons, and chemotherapy or transplantation may result in secondary treatment-related MDS. Methods: A patient was diagnosed with both MDS and MGUS, which was treated using thalidomide, dexamethasone, and danazol. A follow-up blood test was conducted to determine leukocyte and hemoglobin levels. Results: Immunoprotein electrophoresis showed M protein peak with IgA+ κ components. Nuclear cells proliferated actively in bone marrow aspirates. Bone marrow analysis suggested a myelodysplastic syndrome with myeloblastoma (MDS-RS) and a new plasmacytoma. The immunophenotype was shown as follows: R5 cells (red) are about 15.5%. Among the CD38+CD45 cells, about 95.9% of cKappa cells and 1.7% of cLambda cells are considered as plasmacytoma. Gene detection showed that the patient carried 14 gene mutations, and karyotype analysis showed that they had normal male chromosome structure. The patient was diagnosed as MDS and MGUS, and finally discharged after treatment with thalidomide (75 mg daily), dexamethasone (3 mg daily), and danazol (200 mg twice daily). Within 1 year, the disease has stabilized. Conclusion: The combination of plasma cell disease and myeloid malignancy may increase mortality. This is uncommon and may be easily misdiagnosed if not detected early. When a myeloid neoplasm tests positive for MDS and serum M protein, clinicians should evaluate for other plasma cell disease.

Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of gestrinone in the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Endometriosis is a common chronic gynecological disease defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma tissue outside the uterus. Gestrinone is an effective antiestrogen that induces endometrial atrophy and/or amenorrhea. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an evaluation of safety and effectiveness of gestrinone for the treatment of endometriosis. METHODS: We performed a search in six electronic databases: PubMed, MEDLINE (ovid), Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL (clinical trials), Web of Science and Scopus. Our selected primary outcomes were the changes in dysmenorrhea, pain relief including pelvic pain and dyspareunia. The secondary outcomes embrace hormones parameters, pregnancy rate and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 3269 references screened, 16 studies were included involving 1286 women. All studies compared gestrinone with other drugs treatments (placebo, Danazol, Mifepristone tablets, Leuprolide acetate, Quyu Jiedu Recipe) during 6 months. When compared with other drugs treatments, gestrinone relieved dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and morphologic response in the ovary. There was an increase on the pregnancy rate. Regarding the side effects observed, gestrinone showed the same adverse events and increased the risk of acne and seborrhea when compared to other treatments. Even if there was any difference in efficacy between gestrinone, danazol, leuprolide acetate, or Quyu Jiedu Recipe Chinese Medicine, it remains unclear due to insufficient data. CONCLUSION: Based limited evidence available suggests that gestrinone appeared to be safe and may have some efficacy advantages over danazol, as well as other therapeutic interventions for treating endometriosis. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution, due the quality of the evidence provided is generally very low or unclear. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42021284148.

Ruxolitinib combined with prednisone, thalidomide and danazol in patients with myelofibrosis: Results of a pilot study.

Ruxolitinib is a safe and effective therapy of myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated (MPN) myelofibrosis. However, often there are dose reductions and/or therapy interruptions because of therapy-related adverse events (AEs), especially anemia and thrombocytopenia. We previously reported combined therapy with prednisone, thalidomide and danazol (PTD) reversed anemia and thrombocytopenia in people with MPN-associated myelofibrosis. We wondered whether adding PTD to ruxolitinib might mitigate the hematologic AEs and thereby avoid the dose reduction of ruxolitinib and improve the efficacy. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a baseline hemoglobin and platelet concentration assignment prospective observational study in 72 patients comparing 3-month dose adjustment and efficacy of ruxolitinib with (N = 53, the study group) or without (N = 19, the control group) PTD. According to the platelet counts, the median daily ruxolitinib doses in the study group increased from 30 to 40 mg by week 12, whereas in the control group it remained at 30 mg (p = 0.019). In the study group 35 patients had a hemoglobin increase ≥10 g/L compared with no patient receiving ruxolitinib only (p < 0.001). Platelet increases >100 × 10E+9/L were seen in 56.6% and 5.3% of patients in the two groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients with anemia and thrombocytopenia, 18 patients in the study group had an anemia response at week 12 and 12 had a platelet increase of ≥50 × 10E+9/L. No patient in the control group achieved either response (p < 0.001 and p = 0.078). The study group had a more spleen response than the control group (p = 0.046). Peripheral edema and transaminase elevation were the main nonhematologic AEs of PTD. These AEs can be alleviated by adjusting the danazol dose. In conclusion, adding PTD to ruxolitinib improved ruxolitinib-associated anemia and thrombocytopenia, and resulted in a higher ruxolitinib dose.

Gut microbiome alterations in hereditary angioedema.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease with wide intra- and interindividual clinical variation. There are no reliable indicators available in clinical practice to predict the onset and severity of HAE. Uncovering the changes in the gut microbiota in HAE patients may offer insight into a missing piece of the pathogenesis and help explain the clinical heterogeneity. OBJECTIVE: Explore whether dysbiosis exists in patients with HAE and whether there are biomarkers to indicate the episodes. METHODS: Fecal samples and clinical data were collected from patients with C1-inhibitor-related HAE and their healthy family members. Patients were grouped on the basis of the most recent conditions of HAE episodes and major clinical manifestations. The gut microbiota was evaluated by sequencing the 16S ribosomal RNA gene and analyzed for diversity. RESULTS: Microbial richness and diversity were significantly reduced among patients who had recent HAE attacks, especially for those presenting with abdominal symptoms (P = .003 and P = .048 compared with healthy controls and patients with no recent episodes, respectively). Decreased Firmicutes and increased Proteobacteria were found among the individuals with a recent episode, along with a marked increase of pathogenic bacteria on the basis of the predictive functional profiling. Dysbiosis was restored after regular use of danazol or tranexamic acid. A combined biomarker composed of Bifidobacterium, Lachnospira, Paraprevotella, Desulfovibrio, and Staphylococcus was proposed to detect the recent edema episodes. CONCLUSION: We reported alterations of the gut microbiome in patients with HAE and explored the possible role of bacteria in the etiology of edema episodes, which may provide new clues for the prediction of disease course, clinical treatment, and therapeutic evaluation.

Identifying the Dominant Contribution of Human Cytochrome P450 2J2 to the Metabolism of Rivaroxaban, an Oral Anticoagulant.

PURPOSE: Rivaroxaban, an oral anticoagulant, undergoes the metabolism mediated by human cytochrome P450 (CYP). The present study is to quantitatively analyze and compare the contributions of multiple CYPs in the metabolism of rivaroxaban to provide new information for medication safety. METHODS: The metabolic stability of rivaroxaban in the presence of human liver microsomes (HLMs) and recombinant CYPs was systematically evaluated to estimate the participation of various CYP isoforms. Furthermore, the catalytic efficiency of CYP isoforms was compared via metabolic kinetic studies of rivaroxaban with recombinant CYP isoenzymes, as well as via CYP-specific inhibitory studies. Additionally, docking simulations were used to illustrate molecular interactions. RESULTS: Multiple CYP isoforms were involved in the hydroxylation of rivaroxaban, with decreasing catalytic rates as follows: CYP2J2 > 3A4 > 2D6 > 4F3 > 1A1 > 3A5 > 3A7 > 2A6 > 2E1 > 2C9 > 2C19. Among the CYPs, 2J2, 3A4, 2D6, and 4F3 were the four major isoforms responsible for rivaroxaban metabolism. Notably, the intrinsic clearance of rivaroxaban catalyzed by CYP2J2 was nearly 39-, 64-, and 100-fold that catalyzed by CYP3A4, 2D6, and 4F3, respectively. In addition, rivaroxaban hydroxylation was inhibited by 41.1% in the presence of the CYP2J2-specific inhibitor danazol, which was comparable to the inhibition rate of 43.3% by the CYP3A-specific inhibitor ketoconazole in mixed HLMs. Furthermore, molecular simulations showed that rivaroxaban is principally bound to CYP2J2 by π-alkyl bonds, carbon-hydrogen bonds, and alkyl interactions. CONCLUSION: CYP2J2 dominated the hydroxylation of rivaroxaban, which may provide new insight into clinical drug interactions involving rivaroxaban.

Interventions for the long-term prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a serious and potentially life-threatening condition that causes acute attacks of swelling, pain and reduced quality of life. People with Type I HAE (approximately 80% of all HAE cases) have insufficient amounts of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) protein; people with Type II HAE (approximately 20% of all cases) may have normal C1-INH concentrations, but, due to genetic mutations, these do not function properly. A few people, predominantly females, experience HAE despite having normal C1-INH levels and C1-INH function (rare Type III HAE). Several new drugs have been developed to treat acute attacks and prevent recurrence of attacks. There is currently no systematic review and meta-analysis that included all preventive medications for HAE. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of interventions for the long-term prevention of HAE attacks in people with Type I, Type II or Type III HAE. SEARCH METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 3 August 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials in children or adults with HAE that used medications to prevent HAE attacks. The comparators could be placebo or active comparator, or both; approved and experimental drug trials were eligible for inclusion. There were no restrictions on dose, frequency or intensity of treatment. The minimum length of four weeks of treatment was required for inclusion; this criterion excluded the acute treatment of HAE attacks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. HAE attacks (number of attacks per person, per population) and change in number of HAE attacks; 2. mortality and 3. serious adverse events (e.g. hepatic dysfunction, hepatic toxicity and deleterious changes in blood tests). Our secondary outcomes were 4. quality of life; 5. severity of breakthrough attacks; 6. disability and 7. adverse events (e.g. weight gain, mild psychological changes and body hair). We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 15 studies (912 participants) that met the inclusion criteria. The studies included people with Type I and II HAE. The studies investigated avoralstat, berotralstat, subcutaneous C1-INH, plasma-derived C1-INH, nanofiltered C1-INH, recombinant human C1-INH, danazol, and lanadelumab for the prevention of HAE attacks. We did not find any studies on the use of tranexamic acid for prevention of HAE attacks. All drugs except avoralstat reduced the number of HAE attacks compared with placebo. For breakthrough attacks that occurred despite prophylactic treatment, intravenous and subcutaneous forms of C1-INH and lanadelumab reduced attack severity. It is not known whether other drugs have a similar effect, as the severity of breakthrough attacks in people taking drugs other than C1-INH and lanadelumab was not reported. For quality of life, avoralstat, berotralstat, C1-INH (all forms) and lanadelumab increased quality of life compared with placebo; there were no data for danazol. Four studies reported on changes in disability during treatment with C1-INH, berotralstat and lanadelumab; all three drugs decreased disability compared with placebo. Adverse events, including serious adverse events, did not occur at a rate higher than placebo. However, serious adverse event data and other adverse event data were not available for danazol, which prevented us from drawing conclusions about the absolute or relative safety of this drug. No deaths were reported in the included studies. The analysis was limited by the small number of studies, the small number of participants in each study and the lack of data on older drugs, therefore the certainty of the evidence is low. Given the rarity of HAE, it is not surprising that drugs were rarely directly compared, which does not allow conclusions on the comparative efficacy of the various drugs for people with HAE. Finally, we did not identify any studies that included people with Type III HAE. Therefore, we cannot draw any conclusions about the efficacy or safety of any drug in people with this form of HAE. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available data suggest that berotralstat, C1-INH (subcutaneous, plasma-derived, nanofiltered and recombinant), danazol and lanadelumab are effective in lowering the risk or incidence (or both) of HAE attacks. In addition, C1-INH and lanadelumab decrease the severity of breakthrough attacks (data for other drugs were not available). Avoralstat, berotralstat, C1-INH (all forms) and lanadelumab increase quality of life and do not increase the risk of adverse events, including serious adverse events. It is possible that danazol, subcutaneous C1-INH and recombinant human C1-INH are more effective than berotralstat and lanadelumab in reducing the risk of breakthrough attacks, but the small number of studies and the small size of the studies means that the certainty of the evidence is low. This and the lack of head-to-head trials prevented us from drawing firm conclusions on the relative efficacy of the drugs.

Retrospective review of secondary prevention strategies for gastrointestinal bleeding and associated clinical outcomes in left ventricular assist device patients.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is one of the most common bleeding complications associated with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Currently, there is no strong evidence or clear guidance for which secondary GIB prophylaxis strategy should be implemented after the discontinuation of aspirin. METHODS: Our single-center study describes the outcomes of 26 LVAD patients who experienced a total of 49 GIB events: these individuals were either in Group-1 (lower INR target range) or Group-2 (lower INR target plus a hemostatic agent) as the secondary prophylaxis strategy. Each GIB event was considered an independent event. Outcomes assessed were bleeding reoccurrence rates, time to next GIB, acute GIB strategies, GIB-free days, thromboembolic events, survival, coagulation, and hematologic parameters. RESULTS: GIB reoccurrence rates were not statistically different: Group-1, 9 (40.9%), versus Group-2, 15 (55.6%); p = 0.308. Danazol was utilized 81.5% of the time as the designated hemostatic agent. Additionally, no significant differences were observed with all of our secondary outcome measures for bleeding, ischemic events, or survival. CONCLUSION: While our study was not powered to assess the clinical outcomes related to survival and thromboembolic events, no discernable increased risk for ischemic events including pump thrombosis were observed. Our data suggest that a lower INR target range plus danazol does not confer any additional benefit over a lower INR target range only approach. The results of this report are hypothesis-generating and additional studies are warranted to elucidate the optimal antithrombotic strategy and role of hemostatic agents in reducing the risk of recurrent GIB events.

Endometriosis: Evaluation and Treatment.

Endometriosis is an inflammatory condition caused by the presence of endometrial tissue in extra-uterine locations and can involve bowel, bladder, and all peritoneal structures. It is one of the most common gynecologic disorders, affecting up to 10% of people of reproductive age. Presentation of endometriosis can vary widely, from infertility in asymptomatic people to debilitating pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and period-related gastrointestinal or urinary symptoms. Diagnosis of endometriosis in the primary care setting is clinical and often challenging, frequently resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment. Although transvaginal ultrasonography is used to evaluate endometriosis of deep pelvic sites to rule out other causes of pelvic pain, magnetic resonance imaging is preferred if deep infiltrating endometriosis is suspected. Laparoscopy with biopsy remains the definitive method for diagnosis, although several gynecologic organizations recommend empiric therapy without immediate surgical diagnosis. Combined hormonal contraceptives with or without nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are first-line options in managing symptoms and have a tolerable adverse effect profile. Second-line treatments include gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists with add-back therapy, GnRH receptor antagonists, and danazol. Aromatase inhibitors are reserved for severe disease. All of these treatments are effective but may cause additional adverse effects. Referral to gynecology for surgical management is indicated if empiric therapy is ineffective, immediate diagnosis and treatment are necessary, or patients desire pregnancy. Alternative treatments have limited benefit in alleviating pain symptoms but may warrant further investigation.

Effects of ranibizumab and zoledronic acid on endometriosis in a rat model.

PURPOSE: To investigate the histological efficacy of ranibizumab and zoledronic acid in an experimentally induced endometriosis model as compared with danazol, buserelin acetate and dienogest. METHODS: Endometrial implants were introduced in 52 female Wistar albino rats, which were then randomly divided into six groups. The animals were, respectively, given dienogest, danazol, buserelin acetate, zoledronic acid, ranibizumab and 0.9% NaCl. After 4 weeks, the volumes and histopathological properties of the implants were evaluated and the implants were excised completely at the third laparotomy. A histopathological scoring system was used to evaluate the preservation of epithelia. Endometrial explants were evaluated immunohistochemically. RESULTS: Among the groups, the histological score was significantly lower in the zoledronic acid and ranibizumab groups compared with the controls (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences regarding ellipsoidal volume levels between groups (p > 0.05). However, there was a statistically significant difference regarding cell numbers according to the degree of Bcl-2, NF-κB, and CD31 staining (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in Bcl-2, CD31, or NF-κB staining in the binary comparisons between the other groups (p > 0.05). For Bcl-2 staining, the staining rate of the group treated with zoledronic acid was significantly lower compared with the dienogest and danazol groups (p < 0.05). The staining rates of CD31 and NF-κB were significantly lower in the zoledronic acid and ranibizumab groups compared with the controls (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: According to these results, zoledronic acid and ranibizumab may be putative candidates for the treatment of endometriosis.

3D-QSAR and scaffold hopping based designing of benzo[d]ox-azol-2(3H)-one and 2-oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2(3H)-one derivatives as selective aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 inhibitors: Synthesis and biological evaluation.

Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1A1), an oxidoreductase class of enzymes, is overexpressed in various types of cancer cell lines and is the major cause of resistance to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug, cyclophosphamide (CP). In cancer conditions, CP undergoes a sequence of biotransformations to form an active metabolite, aldophosphamide, which further biotransforms to its putative cytotoxic metabolite, phosphoramide mustard. However, in resistant cancer conditions, aldophosphamide is converted into its inactive metabolite, carboxyphosphamide, via oxidation with ALDH1A1. Herein, to address the issue of ALDH1A1 mediated CP resistance, we report a series of benzo[d]oxazol-2(3H)-one and 2-oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2(3H)-one derivatives as selective ALDH1A1 inhibitors. These inhibitors were designed using a validated 3D-quantitative structure activity relationship (3D-QSAR) model coupled with scaffold hopping. The 3D-QSAR model was developed using reported indole-2,3-diones based ALDH1A1 inhibitors, which provided field points in terms of electrostatic, van der Waals and hydrophobic potentials required for selectively inhibiting ALDH1A1. The most selective indole-2,3-diones-based compound, that is, cmp 3, was further considered for scaffold hopping. Two top-ranked bioisosteres, that is, benzo[d]oxazol-2(3H)-one and 2-oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2(3H)-one, were selected for designing new inhibitors by considering the field pattern of 3D-QSAR. All designed molecules were mapped perfectly on the 3D-QSAR model and found to be predictive with good inhibitory potency (pIC50 range: 7.5-6.8). Molecular docking was carried out for each designed molecule to identify key interactions that are required for ALDH1A1 inhibition and to authenticate the 3D-QSAR result. The top five inhibitor-ALDH1A1 complexes were also submitted for molecular dynamics simulations to access their stability. In vitro enzyme assays of 21 compounds suggested that these compounds are selective toward ALDH1A1 over the other two isoforms, that is, ALDH2 and ALDH3A1. All the compounds were found to be at least three and two times more selective toward ALDH1A1 over ALDH2 and ALDH3A1, respectively. All the compounds showed an IC50 value in the range of 0.02-0.80 µM, which indicates the potential for these to be developed as adjuvant therapy for CP resistance.

Electro-Oxidative C-N Bond Formation through Azolation of Indole Derivatives: An Access to 3-Substituent-2-(Azol-1-yl)indoles.

A practical protocol to synthesize 3-substituent-2-(azol-1-yl)indole derivatives has been developed via an electrochemical oxidative cross coupling process under mild conditions. This electro-oxidative C-N bond formation strategy tolerates a range of functional groups and is amenable to gram scale synthesis. Moreover, this method was applied to the late-stage functionalization of bioactive molecules.

Current medical management of hereditary angioedema: Follow-up survey of US physicians.

BACKGROUND: Physician surveys on hereditary angioedema (HAE) management in 2010 and 2013 revealed important trends in HAE care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current HAE management and the impact of new treatment options on physician practice patterns over time. METHODS: During June and July 2019, 5382 physicians were contacted by means of postal mail to complete a 47-question survey; 177 responded (3%). RESULTS: Across the 3 surveys, the home replaced the emergency department as the most typically reported setting for HAE attack treatment (54.3% vs 11.6% in 2010 and 32.5% in 2013; P < .001). Physicians reported C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) as the most typically prescribed long-term prophylactic treatment (LTP) (60.0% vs 20.4% in 2010 and 56.7% in 2013; P < .001). Subcutaneous LTP medications were most typically prescribed over intravenous (C1-INH, 41.4%; subcutaneous lanadelumab, 21%; intravenous C1-INH, 18.6%). Danazol, the most frequently prescribed LTP treatment, dropped to 6.4% (55.8% in 2010 and 23.4% in 2013; P < .001). The strongest nonefficacy factor influencing clinician treatment choice changed over time, with cost and (or) insurance coverage increasing to 43.7% (from 24.4% in 2010 and 40.5% in 2013; P = .001), whereas the concern over adverse effects dropped to 16.2% (from 55.8% in 2010 and 29.5% in 2013; P < .001). Physician-reported patient satisfaction remains high, with only 1.5% of physicians indicating patients are not satisfied with treatment. CONCLUSION: The US physician survey data reflect improvements in the HAE management in recent years. Therapeutic advances in HAE have led to reported higher rates of home treatment of HAE attacks, reduced concern for adverse treatment effects, and high levels of patient satisfaction.

MOMENTUM: momelotinib vs danazol in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with JAKi who are symptomatic and anemic.

Hallmark features of myelofibrosis (MF) are cytopenias, constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly. Anemia and transfusion dependency are among the most important negative prognostic factors and are exacerbated by many JAK inhibitors (JAKi). Momelotinib (MMB) has been investigated in over 820 patients with MF and possesses a pharmacological and clinical profile differentiated from other JAKi by inhibition of JAK1, JAK2 and ACVR1. MMB is designed to address the complex drivers of iron-restricted anemia and chronic inflammation in MF and should improve constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly while maintaining or improving hemoglobin in JAKi-naive and previously JAKi-treated patients. The MOMENTUM Phase III study is designed to confirm and extend observations of safety and clinical activity of MMB.

Lay abstract The most important features of myelofibrosis (MF) are low blood cell counts and symptoms including tiredness, night sweats and itching, along with increased size of the spleen, which may cause a feeling of fullness and pain. Low red blood cell counts (anemia) may mean regular blood transfusions are needed and this is one of the signs MF is getting worse. Drugs called JAK inhibitors (JAKi) are available to treat MF, but can have a side effect of making blood cell counts lower. Momelotinib (MMB) is a different type of JAKi to the ones currently available, and is an experimental drug for MF. MMB is designed to treat symptoms and spleen like other JAKi, but also to improve blood cell counts. MMB has already been given to more than 820 patients with MF in other clinical studies. Some of the patients in these studies had been treated with different JAKi before, and others got MMB as their first JAKi treatment. The MOMENTUM Phase III study is designed to collect more information on the safety and effectiveness of MMB in MF.

Recurrent and acute abdominal pain as the main clinical manifestation in patients with hereditary angioedema.

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease that often leads to misdiagnosis. The delay of diagnosis is > 10 years in China. Recurrent and acute abdominal pain is one of the common symptoms of HAE. Because of the high misdiagnosis rate, it usually results in unnecessary surgical procedures. This study focused on the clinical symptoms and management of HAE-related abdominal attacks in Chinese patients to provide some new insight for the emergency department (ED) physicians and gastroenterologists. Methods: A Web-based survey was conducted among 107 patients with HAE from 94 unrelated families. Detailed questions with respect to the abdominal attacks were asked, including the frequency, symptoms, and duration before and after confirmed diagnosis. The demographic characteristics, diagnosis process, and treatment outcomes were also included. Results: Approximately 70% of the patients with HAE presented with abdominal symptoms during the onset of edema, mostly characterized by pain (94.8%), nausea (83.1%), vomiting (83.1%), diarrhea (59.7%), and constipation (23.4%). The patients were easily misdiagnosed as having gastroenteritis (35.1%) and appendicitis (10.4%), and 24.7% of them received unnecessary appendectomy or laparotomy. Danazol, a widely used drug for long-term prophylaxis of HAE in China, can reduce the attack frequency and alleviate the abdominal symptoms, but the adverse effects are also significant and more severe in women. Conclusions: Abdominal symptoms are common and important clinical features of HAE but are easily confused with other gastrointestinal diseases. ED physicians and gastroenterologists should consider HAE when patients experience recurrent and unexplained abdominal pain. Proper medical treatment should be administered in a timely manner if an HAE diagnosis is confirmed and efforts are required to increase access in China to medications both for on-demand treatment and long-term prophylaxis.

The diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema patients in Japan: A patient reported outcome survey.

BACKGROUND: The rate at which patients are accurately diagnosed with hereditary angioedema (HAE), as well as diagnosed patients access to modern treatments differs greatly among countries. Moreover, the severity and burden of HAE on patients have been reported mostly on the basis of physician-reported surveys. To gain insight into the real-world conditions of patients with HAE through a patient-reported survey in Japan and identify any unmet needs. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to 121 patients with HAE via a Japanese HAE patient organization during 2016-2017. Responses were collected from 70 patients (57.9%) and subjected to analysis. RESULTS: The average periods from the initial appearance of symptoms (e.g. edema) to a HAE diagnosis was 15.6 years (min-max, 0-53). Patients visited an average of 4.6 different departments until receiving a definitive diagnosis. The average age at the first visit was 25.6 years (3-73) and at diagnosis 32.8 years (0-73). Patients reported an average of 15.7 (0-100) attacks per year, but only 53.1% of attacks were treated. The days of hospitalization due to severe attacks was 14.3 (0-200) before diagnosis, but these declined to 4.3 (0-50) after diagnosis. In the treatment for attacks, 82% of the patients were treated with the plasma-derived C1 inhibitor concentrate, and 69% of the patients reported experiencing a therapeutic effect. CONCLUSIONS: There is a long gap between first attack and diagnosis of HAE, and the number of non-treated attacks is high in Japan. Steps are needed to improve the diagnostic and treatment environments to address these issues.