Haloperidol for the Treatment of Delirium in ICU Patients.

BACKGROUND: Haloperidol is frequently used to treat delirium in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), but evidence of its effect is limited. METHODS: In this multicenter, blinded, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned adult patients with delirium who had been admitted to the ICU for an acute condition to receive intravenous haloperidol (2.5 mg 3 times daily plus 2.5 mg as needed up to a total maximum daily dose of 20 mg) or placebo. Haloperidol or placebo was administered in the ICU for as long as delirium continued and as needed for recurrences. The primary outcome was the number of days alive and out of the hospital at 90 days after randomization. RESULTS: A total of 1000 patients underwent randomization; 510 were assigned to the haloperidol group and 490 to the placebo group. Among these patients, 987 (98.7%) were included in the final analyses (501 in the haloperidol group and 486 in the placebo group). Primary outcome data were available for 963 patients (97.6%). At 90 days, the mean number of days alive and out of the hospital was 35.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.9 to 38.6) in the haloperidol group and 32.9 (95% CI, 29.9 to 35.8) in the placebo group, with an adjusted mean difference of 2.9 days (95% CI, -1.2 to 7.0) (P = 0.22). Mortality at 90 days was 36.3% in the haloperidol group and 43.3% in the placebo group (adjusted absolute difference, -6.9 percentage points [95% CI, -13.0 to -0.6]). Serious adverse reactions occurred in 11 patients in the haloperidol group and in 9 patients in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in the ICU with delirium, treatment with haloperidol did not lead to a significantly greater number of days alive and out of the hospital at 90 days than placebo. (Funded by Innovation Fund Denmark and others; AID-ICU ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03392376; EudraCT number, 2017-003829-15.).

Treatment of Delirium During Critical Illness.

Delirium, an acute disturbance in mental status due to another medical condition, is common and morbid in the intensive care unit. Despite its clear association with multiple common risk factors and important outcomes, including mortality and long-term cognitive impairment, both the ultimate causes of and ideal treatments for delirium remain unclear. Studies suggest that neuroinflammation, hypoxia, alterations in energy metabolism, and imbalances in multiple neurotransmitter pathways contribute to delirium, but commonly used treatments (e.g., antipsychotic medications) target only one or a few of these potential mechanisms and are not supported by evidence of efficacy. At this time, the optimal treatment for delirium during critical illness remains avoidance of risk factors, though ongoing trials may expand on the promise shown by agents such as melatonin and dexmedetomidine.

From Traditional Typing to Intelligent Insights: A Narrative Review of Directions Toward Targeted Therapies in Delirium.

Delirium is a heterogeneous syndrome characterized by an acute change in level of consciousness that is associated with inattention and disorganized thinking. Delirium affects most critically ill patients and is associated with poor patient-oriented outcomes such as increased mortality, longer ICU and hospital length of stay, and worse long-term cognitive outcomes. The concept of delirium and its subtypes has existed since nearly the beginning of recorded medical literature, yet robust therapies have yet to be identified. Analogous to other critical illness syndromes, we suspect the lack of identified therapies stems from patient heterogeneity and prior subtyping efforts that do not capture the underlying etiology of delirium. The time has come to leverage machine learning approaches, such as supervised and unsupervised clustering, to identify clinical and pathophysiological distinct clusters of delirium that will likely respond differently to various interventions. We use sedation in the ICU as an example of how precision therapies can be applied to critically ill patients, highlighting the fact that while for some patients a sedative drug may cause delirium, in another cohort sedation is the specific treatment. Finally, we conclude with a proposition to move away from the term delirium, and rather focus on the treatable traits that may allow precision therapies to be tested.

Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing whether the use of antipsychotic medications in critically ill adult patients with delirium impacts patient-important outcomes. DATA SOURCES: A medical librarian searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, and Wiley's Cochrane Library as well as clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform up to November 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Independently and in duplicate, reviewers screened abstracts and titles for eligibility, then full text of qualifying studies. We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included critically ill adult patients with delirium. The intervention group was required to receive antipsychotic medications at any dose, whereas the control group received usual care or placebo. DATA EXTRACTION: Reviewers extracted data independently and in duplicate using a piloted abstraction form. Statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan software (version 5.4). DATA SYNTHESIS: Five RCTs ( n = 1750) met eligibility criteria. The use of antipsychotic medications compared with placebo did not increase the number of delirium- or coma-free days (mean difference 0.90 d; 95% CI, -0.32 to 2.12; moderate certainty), nor did it result in a difference in mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU, or hospital length of stay. The use of antipsychotics did not result in an increased risk of adverse events (risk ratio 1.27; 95% CI, 0.71-2.30; high certainty). Subgroup analysis of typical versus atypical antipsychotics did not identify any subgroup effect for any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated with moderate certainty that there is no difference in delirium- or coma-free days when delirious critically ill adults are treated with antipsychotic medications. Further studies in the subset of patients with hyperactive delirium may be of benefit.

Efficacy and Safety of Risperidone in Patients With Delirium: The RIDDLE Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The cornerstone treatment of delirium is to assess and treat its underlying causes and prevent further complications. Drug therapy may be necessary to control agitation and behavioral symptoms associated with delirium. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of a randomized placebo controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of delirium. METHODS: This was a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Patients were enrolled in the study if they were hospitalized and 65 years or older and had a diagnosis of delirium. Delirium Rating Scale revised 98 was used to determine delirium and motor agitation. RESULTS: A total of 14 participants with 57% being men and having a mean age of 86 years were included. There were no statistically significant differences between the risperidone and placebo group for the Delirium Rating Scale revised 98 score. There were no severe adverse reactions reported in the study, and no patients discontinued the study for adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone at low doses (1 mg daily or less) was well tolerated for the treatment of delirium. Future large-scale trials are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of risperidone in the treatment of delirium. This pilot study taught us that the phase 2 RIsperDone DELirium trial will need a multicenter design with more research personnel to increase the number of participants enrolled.

Preventive Effects of Ramelteon, Suvorexant, and Lemborexant on Delirium in Hospitalized Patients With Physical Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: New sleep-inducing drugs (eg, ramelteon, suvorexant, and lemborexant) have been shown to prevent delirium in high-risk groups. However, no single study has simultaneously evaluated the delirium-preventing effects of all novel sleep-inducing drugs in hospitalized patients. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the relationship between sleep-inducing drugs and delirium prevention in patients hospitalized in general medical-surgical settings for nonpsychiatric conditions who underwent liaison interventions for insomnia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated in general medical-surgical settings for nonpsychiatric conditions with consultation-liaison psychiatry consult for insomnia. Delirium was diagnosed by fully certified psychiatrists using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 th edition. The following items were retrospectively examined from medical records as factors related to delirium development: type of sleep-inducing drugs, age, sex, and delirium risk factors. The risk factors of delirium development were calculated using adjusted odds ratios (aORs) via multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 710 patients analyzed, 257 (36.2%) developed delirium. Suvorexant (aOR, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.94; P = 0.02) and lemborexant (aOR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14-0.39; P < 0.0001) significantly reduced the risk of developing delirium. Benzodiazepines (aOR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.15-3.13; P = 0.01) significantly increased this risk. Ramelteon (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.84-2.01; P = 0.24) and Z-drugs (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.81-1.98; P = 0.30) were not significantly associated with delirium development. CONCLUSIONS: The use of suvorexant and lemborexant may prevent delirium in patients with a wide range of medical conditions.

A joint frailty model for recurrent and competing terminal events: Application to delirium in the ICU.

Joint models linking longitudinal biomarkers or recurrent event processes with a terminal event, for example, mortality, have been studied extensively. Motivated by studies of recurrent delirium events in patients receiving care in an intensive care unit (ICU), we devise a joint model for a recurrent event process and multiple terminal events. Being discharged alive from the ICU or experiencing mortality may be associated with a patient's hazard of delirium, violating the assumption of independent censoring. Moreover, the direction of the association between the hazards of delirium and mortality may be opposite of the direction of association between the hazards of delirium and ICU discharge. Hence treating either terminal event as independent censoring may bias inferences. We propose a competing joint model that uses a latent frailty to link a patient's recurrent and competing terminal event processes. We fit our model to data from a completed placebo-controlled clinical trial, which studied whether Haloperidol could prevent death and delirium among ICU patients. The clinical trial served as a foundation for a simulation study, in which we evaluate the properties, for example, bias and confidence interval coverage, of the competing joint model. As part of the simulation study, we demonstrate the shortcomings of using a joint model with a recurrent delirium process and a single terminal event to study delirium in the ICU. Lastly, we discuss limitations and possible extensions for the competing joint model. The competing joint model has been added to frailtypack, an R package for fitting an assortment of joint models.

Incidence of Adverse Events Using Flumazenil in Patients With Iatrogenic Benzodiazepine Delirium: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Flumazenil is a competitive benzodiazepine (BZD) antagonist most used for treating delirium in BZD overdoses. Since its introduction, many have expressed concerns about its safety secondary to the risk of inducing BZD withdrawal and refractory seizures. STUDY QUESTION: What is the incidence of adverse drug events after the administration of flumazenil in patients with suspected iatrogenic BZD delirium? STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients from a single center from 2010 to 2013. Patients experiencing delirium after receiving BZDs in the hospital were included if they had a bedside toxicology consult and were administered flumazenil. Patients were excluded if they were given BZDs for ethanol withdrawal or if they did not have mental status documentation before and after flumazenil administration. Descriptive statistics were calculated. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the incidence of adverse drug events after flumazenil administration. The secondary outcome was the efficacy of flumazenil determined by the patient's mental status. RESULTS: A total of 501 patient records were reviewed, and 206 patients were included in the final analysis. Of those patients, 172 (83.5%) experienced an objective improvement in their mental status within 1 hour after flumazenil administration. A total of 5 patients experienced adverse events (2.4%), 95% confidence interval (0.78, 5.54). Of these, 3 patients experienced minor agitation or restlessness without pharmacologic intervention. Two patients experienced moderate agitation or restlessness that resolved with haloperidol or physostigmine administration. No patients had a reported seizure, 95% confidence interval (0.0, 1.77). CONCLUSIONS: Flumazenil seems to be a safe and effective intervention for the reversal of delirium secondary to iatrogenic BZD administration.

Listeria brain abscess: a therapeutically challenging rare presentation of listeriosis.

We report a very rare case of Listeria multiple brain abscesses manifested as delirium, which represented diagnostic and therapeutic challenges overcome only by the close cooperation between Infectious Diseases and Neuroradiology, without which a satisfactory outcome would not be achieved.An elderly man presented with confusion and drowsiness with a background of type-II diabetes mellitus. Although computed tomography of the brain only showed frontal lobe oedema, contrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging showed numerous irregular rim-enhancing lesions containing central diffusion restriction, suggesting multiple pyogenic cerebral abscesses of unclear aetiology. Thereafter, Listeria monocytogenes was isolated from blood cultures, suggesting this as the causative organism. Deemed unsuitable for neurosurgical drainage, the patient received medical management with a protracted course of antibiotics. This case was extremely challenging, due to 1) the impossibility of source control, 2) the small number of effective antibiotics available to treat this condition, and 3) the inevitable antibiotic side-effects, derived from long-term exposure. A successful outcome was only possible thanks to strict close multidisciplinary follow up, requiring frequent MR imaging and a judicious antibiotic choice, including monitoring of their side-effects. Due to the rarity of this condition, there is lack of guidance on its management, hence the importance of multidisciplinary involvement with very close imaging and antibiotic monitoring.

Prevention of post-operative delirium using an overnight infusion of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a pragmatic, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: After cardiac surgery, post-operative delirium (PoD) is acknowledged to have a significant negative impact on patient outcome. To date, there is no valuable and specific treatment for PoD. Critically ill patients often suffer from poor sleep condition. There is an association between delirium and sleep quality after cardiac surgery. This study aimed to establish whether promoting sleep using an overnight infusion of dexmedetomidine reduces the incidence of delirium after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Randomized, pragmatic, multicentre, double-blind, placebo controlled trial from January 2019 to July 2021. All adult patients aged 65 years or older requiring elective cardiac surgery were randomly assigned 1:1 either to the dexmedetomidine group or the placebo group on the day of surgery. Dexmedetomidine or matched placebo infusion was started the night after surgery from 8 pm to 8 am and administered every night while the patient remained in ICU, or for a maximum of 7 days. Primary outcome was the occurrence of postoperative delirium (PoD) within the 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 348 patients provided informed consent, of whom 333 were randomized: 331 patients underwent surgery and were analysed (165 assigned to dexmedetomidine and 166 assigned to placebo). The incidence of PoD was not significantly different between the two groups (12.6% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.97). Patients treated with dexmedetomidine had significantly more hypotensive events (7.3% vs 0.6%; p < 0.01). At 3 months, functional outcomes (Short-form 36, Cognitive failure questionnaire, PCL-5) were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In patients recovering from an elective cardiac surgery, an overnight infusion of dexmedetomidine did not decrease postoperative delirium. Trial registration This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT03477344; date: 26th March 2018).

Inhibition of RXRA-mediated PLA2G2A improves delirium in COPD mice by regulating endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway and inhibiting cell apoptosis.

Delirium is a common psychiatric complication of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The relief of delirium is considered one of the beneficial ways to treat COPD. However, there are currently no specific drugs that alleviate delirium in COPD patients. Our research aimed to elucidate the specific mechanisms underlying delirium in COPD mice, while also seeking more effective therapeutic targets. In our study, bioinformatics analysis and qRT PCR were used to identify key factors in the development of delirium in COPD animal models. Open field and elevated plus maze tests were used to detect delirium in mice. Tunel staining and HE staining were used to analyze the apoptosis of mouse hippocampus cells. EdU and CCK-8 experiments were used to analyze PC-12 cells vitality and proliferation. JASPAR online database, dual luciferase reporting experiments, ChIP experiments, and IF staining were used to analyze the interaction between RXRA and PLA2G2A. RXRA is highly expressed in the brain tissue of COPD mice with delirium symptoms. The downregulation of RXRA inhibits the delirium state in COPD mice. This is mainly due to the reduction of endoplasmic reticulum stress and cell apoptosis by inhibiting the expression of RXRA. In addition, we also confirmed that RXRA is a transcription factor of PLA2G2A. RXRA has an inhibitory effect on the expression of PLA2G2A. In vitro experiments have confirmed that inhibition of the RXRA/PLA2G2A axis reduces cell apoptosis, thereby alleviating the occurrence and development of delirium in COPD mice. Inhibition of the RXRA/PLA2G2A axis reduces endoplasmic reticulum stress and cell apoptosis. This process alleviates the development of delirium in COPD mice.

Differences in Delirium Evaluation and Pharmacologic Management in Children With Developmental Delay: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Delirium is associated with increased mortality and cost, decreased neurocognition, and decreased quality of life in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) population. The Cornell Assessment for Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) is used in PICUs for delirium screening but lacks specificity in children with developmental delay (DD). Within a cohort of children receiving pharmacologic treatment for intensive care unit (ICU) delirium, we compared delirium scoring and medication management between children with and without DD. We hypothesized that CAPD scores and treatment decisions would differ between DD and neurotypical (NT) patients. In this retrospective case-control study, we queried the medical record of patients admitted to our PICU with respiratory failure from June 2018 to March 2022 who received antipsychotics typically used for ICU delirium. Antipsychotics prescribed for home use were excluded. Nonparametric statistics compared demographics, CAPD scores, medication choice, dosing (mg/kg), and medication continuation after discharge between those with and without DD based on the ICD-10 codes. Twenty-one DD admissions and 59 NT admissions were included. Groups did not significantly differ by demographics, LOS, drug, or initial dosage. DD patients had higher median CAPD scores at admission (17 vs 13; P = .02) and treatment initiation (18 vs 16.5; P = .05). Providers more frequently escalated doses in DD patients (13/21 vs 21/59; P = .04) and discharged them home on new antipsychotics (7/21 vs 5/59; P = .01). DD patients experience delirium screening and management differently than NT counterparts. Providers should be aware of baseline elevated scores in DD patients and carefully attend to indications for dosage escalation. Further work is needed to understand if prolonged duration, even after hospital discharge, benefits patients, or represents potential disparity in care.

Antipsychotic Use for ICU Delirium and Associated Inflammatory Markers.

Purpose: We sought to evaluate critically ill patients with delirium to evaluate inflammatory cytokine production and delirium progression and the role of antipsychotics. Materials and Methods: Adult critically ill patients with confirmed delirium according to a positive CAM-ICU score were included and IL-6 and IL-8 levels were trended for 24 h in this single-center, prospective, observational cohort study. Results: A total of 23 patients were consented and had blood samples drawn for inclusion. There was no difference in IL-6 and IL-8 levels at baseline, 4 to 8 h, and 22 to 28 h after enrollment when comparing patients based on antipsychotic exposure. We identified 2 patient clusters based on age, APACHE III, need for mechanical ventilation, and concomitant infection. In cluster 1, 5 (33.3%) patients received antipsychotics versus 5 (62.5%) patients in cluster 2 (P = .18). Patients in cluster 1 had more co-inflammatory conditions (P < .0001), yet numerically lower baseline IL-6 (P = .18) and IL-8 levels (P = .80) compared to cluster 2. Patients in cluster 1 had a greater median number of delirium-free days compared to cluster 2 (17.0 vs 6.0 days; P = .05). Conclusions: In critically ill patients with delirium, IL-6 and IL-8 levels were variable and antipsychotics were not associated with improvements in delirium or inflammatory markers.

Comparison of Remimazolam and Propofol on Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Undergoing Radical Resection of Colon Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND We compared the effect of remimazolam and propofol intravenous anesthesia on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS One hundred patients undergoing elective radical operation of colon cancer under general anesthesia were divided into a remimazolam group (group R) and propofol group (group P) by a random number table method. During anesthesia induction and maintenance, group R was intravenously injected with remimazolam to exert sedation; however, in group P, propofol was injected instead of remimazolam. The occurrence of postoperative delirium was assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit scale and postoperative pain was assessed with the visual analogue score (VAS). The primary outcome measures were the incidence and duration of delirium within 7 days following surgery. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative VAS scores, intraoperative anesthetic drug dosage, and adverse reactions, including nausea and vomiting, hypoxemia, and respiratory depression. RESULTS There was no significant difference in baseline data between the 2 groups (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence and duration of postoperative delirium between the 2 groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in VAS scores, remifentanil consumption, and adverse reactions, including nausea and vomiting, hypoxemia, and respiratory depression between the 2 groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS In elderly patients undergoing radical colon cancer surgery, remimazolam administration did not improve or aggravate the incidence and duration of delirium, compared with propofol.

Fixed dose ketamine for prehospital management of hyperactive delirium with severe agitation.

INTRODUCTION: Patients exhibiting signs of hyperactive delirium with severe agitation (HDSA) may require sedating medications for stabilization and safe transport to the hospital. Determining the patient's weight and calculating the correct weight-based dose may be challenging in an emergency. A fixed dose ketamine protocol is an alternative to the traditional weight-based administration, which may also reduce dosing errors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of adverse events following pre-hospital ketamine administration for HDSA. METHODS: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) records from four agencies were searched for prehospital ketamine administration. Cases were included if a 250 mg dose of ketamine was administered on standing order to an adult patient for clinical signs consistent with HDSA. Protocols allowed for a second 250 mg dose of ketamine if the first dose was not effective. Both the 250 mg initial dose and the total prehospital dose were analyzed for weight based dosing and adverse events. RESULTS: Review of 132 cases revealed 60 cases that met inclusion criteria. Patients' median weight was 80 kg (range: 50-176 kg). No patients were intubated by EMS, one only requiring suction, three required respiratory support via bag valve mask (BVM). Six (10%) patients were intubated in the emergency department (ED) including the three (5%) supported by EMS via BVM, three (5%) others who were sedated further in the ED prior to requiring intubation. All six patients who were intubated were discharged from the hospital with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 score. The weight-based dosing equivalent for the 250 mg initial dose (OR: 2.62, CI: 0.67-10.22) and the total prehospital dose, inclusive of the 12 patients that were administered a second dose, (OR: 0.74, CI: 0.27, 2.03), were not associated with the need for intubation. CONCLUSION: The 250 mg fixed dose of ketamine was not >5 mg/kg weight-based dose equivalent for all patients in this study. Although a second 250 mg dose of ketamine was permitted under standing orders, only 12 (20%) of the patients were administered a second dose, none experienced an adverse event. This indicates that the 250 mg initial dose was effective for 80% of the patients. Four patients with prehospital adverse events likely related to the administration of ketamine were found. One required suction, three (5%) requiring BVM respiratory support by EMS were subsequently intubated upon arrival in the ED. All 60 patients were discharged from the hospital alive. Further research is needed to determine an optimal single administration dose for ketamine in patients exhibiting signs of HDSA, if employing a standardized fixed dose medication protocol streamlines administration, and if the fixed dose medication reduces the occurrence of dosage errors.

In adults with delirium in the ICU, haloperidol did not increase number of days alive out of the hospital at 90 d.

SOURCE CITATION: Andersen-Ranberg NC, Poulsen LM, Perner A, et al. Haloperidol for the treatment of delirium in ICU patients. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:2425-35. 36286254.

Quetiapine Versus Haloperidol in the Management of Hyperactive Delirium: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the population of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), most studies compared the use of atypical antipsychotics, such as quetiapine, with the use of traditional haloperidol in patients with delirium of various forms and etiologies. The role of such agents in patients with hyperactive delirium is not fully understood. This study compares the effectiveness of quetiapine with haloperidol in treating the hyperactive form of delirium in terms of their effects on the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98), length of stay in the ICU, and mortality in critically ill patients. METHODS: One hundred adult patients diagnosed with hyperactive delirium were randomly assigned to receive either oral quetiapine (25-50 mg/day) or haloperidol (1-2 mg/day). The response, defined as "a DRS-R-98 severity score reduction from baseline of 50% or more" and a DRS-R-98 severity score of 12 or less without relapse, was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 68 ± 6 years. The study population's overall response rate was 92%. Response rates for the two groups were remarkably equal (p = 0.609). Secondary outcomes were comparable in both groups, such as ICU mortality (p = 0.496), in-hospital mortality (p = 0.321), in-hospital stay (p = 0.310), and the need for mechanical ventilation (p > 0.99). But the quetiapine group showed a statistically reduced mean ICU stay (10.1 ± 2.0 vs. 11.7 ± 2.6 days, p = 0.018) and increased sleeping hours per night (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine may be equally as effective as haloperidol in treating the symptoms of hyperactive delirium in critically ill patients, with no mortality benefit.

Treatment of Anticholinergic Delirium with Oral Rivastigmine: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Anticholinergic toxicity is commonly encountered in the emergency department. However, the availability of physostigmine, a central acetylcholinesterase inhibitor used to reverse anticholinergic delirium, has been significantly limited due to national drug shortages in the United States. Several articles have explored the viability of rivastigmine as an alternative treatment in these patients. CASE REPORT: A 33-year-old man presented to the emergency department after a suspected suicide attempt. The patient was found with an empty bottle of diphenhydramine at the scene. On arrival, he was tachycardic and delirious, with dilated and nonreactive pupils and dry skin. As the clinical picture was highly suggestive of anticholinergic toxicity, the patient was treated with oral rivastigmine at a starting dose of 4.5 mg to reverse his anticholinergic delirium. Although a repeat dose was required, his delirium resolved without recurrence. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This? Oral rivastigmine has been applied successfully here and in other case reports to reverse anticholinergic delirium with the benefit of prolonged agitation control. Emergency physicians may consider this medication in consultation with a specialist, with initial doses starting at 4.5-6 mg, if encountering anticholinergic delirium when physostigmine is not available.

Facilitators and Barriers Influencing Antipsychotic Medication Prescribing and Deprescribing Practices in Critically Ill Adult Patients: a Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic medications do not alter the incidence or duration of delirium, but these medications are frequently prescribed and continued at transitions of care in critically ill patients when they may no longer be necessary or appropriate. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify and describe relevant domains and constructs that influence antipsychotic medication prescribing and deprescribing practices among physicians, nurses, and pharmacists that care for critically ill adult patients during and following critical illness. DESIGN: We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with critical care and ward healthcare professionals including physicians, nurses, and pharmacists to understand antipsychotic prescribing and deprescribing practices for critically ill adult patients during and following critical illness. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one interviews were conducted with 11 physicians, five nurses, and five pharmacists from predominantly academic centres in Alberta, Canada, between July 6 and October 29, 2021. MAIN MEASURES: We used deductive thematic analysis using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify and describe constructs within relevant domains. KEY RESULTS: Seven TDF domains were identified as relevant from the analysis: Social/Professional role and identity; Beliefs about capabilities; Reinforcement; Motivations and goals; Memory, attention, and decision processes; Environmental context and resources; and Beliefs about consequences. Participants reported antipsychotic prescribing for multiple indications beyond delirium and agitation including patient and staff safety, sleep management, and environmental factors such as staff availability and workload. Participants identified potential antipsychotic deprescribing strategies to reduce ongoing antipsychotic medication prescriptions for critically ill patients including direct communication tools between prescribers at transitions of care. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care and ward healthcare professionals report several factors influencing established antipsychotic medication prescribing practices. These factors aim to maintain patient and staff safety to facilitate the provision of care to patients with delirium and agitation limiting adherence to current guideline recommendations.

Severe Alprazolam Withdrawal With Delirium and Psychosis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

ABSTRACT: In our report, and review of the literature, we present an important clinical lesson for the recognition and treatment of alprazolam withdrawal with complicated delirium and psychosis, and present a strong case for future treatment algorithms. Our case is unique due to the severity of behavioral disturbance associated with acute psychosis secondary to alprazolam withdrawal and the significant quantity of alprazolam consumed. The use of high cumulative doses of longer-acting benzodiazepines resulted in rapid improvement in symptoms with full resolution of psychosis. Within 4 days of treatment in hospital, delirium and psychosis had fully resolved. Detoxification continued in the community and the patient was followed up in clinic for monitoring of mental state. There was no recurrence of psychotic symptoms.