Somato-somatic theory of referred pain elucidates observations of referred sensations during micropigmentation of nipple-areolar complex in a cohort study on patients undergoing pedicled latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction.

AIM: Micropigmentation of the nipple-areolar complex is the final aesthetic step in autologous breast reconstruction. The mechanism of referred pain observed in patients during micropigmentation after a non-neurotonized pedicled latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction is poorly understood. METHODS: Patients undergoing micropigmentation for nipple-areolar restoration at our breast unit were included in this study. Baseline sensitivity of both breasts was recorded using a questionnaire and non-invasive Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing. Patients experiencing local and regional referred symptoms, while undergoing micropigmentation, were identified and their clinical data were collected and analysed. Three months postoperatively, the patients completed a questionnaire pertaining to their satisfaction and future analgesic preference. RESULTS: Thirty (17.8%) patients experienced referred sensations during micropigmentation. Their symptoms ranged from "ache" (6.7%), "discomfort" (13.3%) to "deep pain" (13.3%) and were either local and/or referred to ipsilateral axilla, upper limb and back. The majority were pleased with postoperative outcomes [shape (30, 100%), size (28, 93.3%), colour match (22, 73.3%)] and a small number were not satisfied with the shape (2, 6.7%,) position (1, 3.3%) and appearance of the tattoo (1, 3.3%). CONCLUSION: Micropigmentation is a safe procedure with good patient satisfaction and low rates of complications; however, patients may experience significant local or referred symptoms. This observation can be explained by the proposed "somato-somatic" theory of referred pain and ascertains the need for use of oral and/or local anaesthetic as well as improved counselling in these patients.

Headache from clinically confirmed hemicrania continua arising from the sternocleidomastoid muscle: a case report.

BACKGROUND: A patient with a history of cluster headaches, now in remission, presented with confirmed hemicrania continua that resolved with a local anaesthetic injection into the Sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia arising from a soft tissue source in the neck. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old man with a history of cluster headaches presented with a six-month history of a new constant right-sided headache. The new headaches were associated with tearing and redness of the right eye and responded to indomethacin, thus meeting the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) diagnostic criteria for hemicrania continua. The history and physical examination suggested a cervical source of the headache arising from the ipsilateral SCM muscle. Injection of the muscle with 1% lidocaine resulted in the elimination of the pain for 1 month without indomethacin. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the convergence of trigeminal, cervical and autonomic nerve fibres, various combinations of headache syndromes can result. This case report demonstrates how a meticulous examination is a crucial component of headache evaluation. Treatment directed to this muscle spared this patient further daily indomethacin and associated side effects.

Arcuate Pubic Ligament Injury-An Unknown Cause of Athletic Pubalgia.

A case report is presented that gives new insight into a very rare cause of athletic pubalgia. Up till now, no case has been published in literature about the relevance of an arcuate pubic ligament (APL) injury in athletic pubalgia. The APL or inferior pubic ligament is a thick triangular arch of ligamentous fibers connecting the 2 pubic bones below. The main function of the APL is to stabilize the symphysis pubis. The rupture of this ligament can lead to groin pain due to lack of stabilization of the symphysis pubis. Despite the importance of the anatomical and clinical function of the APL, very limited research is available about injuries of this ligament. This report describes a case of a traumatic left APL rupture, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging, causing longstanding left groin pain in an amateur athlete.

Inflammatory biomarkers do not distinguish between patients with sciatica and referred leg pain within a primary care population: results from a nested study within the ATLAS cohort.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of sciatica and whether these could be potential targets for treatment. We sought to investigate serum biomarker levels in patients with low back-related leg pain, including sciatica. METHODS: Primary care consulters aged > 18 with low back-related leg pain were recruited to a cohort study (ATLAS). Participants underwent a standardised clinical assessment, lumbar spine MRI and a subsample (n = 119) had samples taken for biomarker analysis. Participants were classified having: a) clinically confirmed sciatica or referred leg pain, and then subdivided into those with (or without) MRI confirmed nerve root compression due to disc prolapse. Seventeen key cytokines, chemokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) implicated in sciatica pathogenesis including TNFα and IL-6, were assayed in duplicate using commercial multiplex detection kits and measured using a Luminex suspension array system. Median biomarker levels were compared between the groups using a Mann Whitney U test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between clinical measures and biomarker levels adjusted for possible confounders such as age, sex, and symptom duration. RESULTS: No difference was found in the serum level of any of the 17 biomarkers tested in patients with (n = 93) or without (n = 26) clinically confirmed sciatica, nor between those with (n = 44) or without (n = 49) sciatica and MRI confirmed nerve root compression. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, no significant differences in serum levels of TNFα, IL-6 or any other biomarkers were seen between patients with sciatica and those with back pain with referred leg pain. These results suggest that in patients with low back-related leg pain, serum markers associated with inflammation do not discriminate between patients with or without clinically confirmed sciatica or between those with or without evidence of nerve root compression on MRI.

Exertional Medial Compartment Syndrome of the Foot-Referred Pain and Sequelae of Delayed Diagnosis: A Case Report.

In a 31-year-old man, the diagnosis of medial compartment syndrome of foot was delayed for 8 days. In contrast to previously reported cases, the patient presented with mainly bilateral lateral thigh-referred pain rather than foot pain. Although delayed decompression of the medial compartment provided dramatic relief of the referred pain, the patient complained of sensory deficit at the medial side of the foot and flexion deformity of the great toe at the final follow-up visit. Medial compartment syndrome of the foot can cause referred pain, and delayed or missed diagnosis can cause irreversible damage. Therefore, prompt diagnosis of compartment syndrome is crucial, and clinicians must consider the possibility of referred pain when the origin of pain is uncertain.

Jaw pain and myocardial ischemia: A review of potential neuroanatomical pathways.

Cardiac pain is usually manifested as a crushing, squeezing, or sensation of pressure in the center of the chest. The pain can be referred to the left shoulder, neck, jaw, and epigastric region as well as the temporomandibular region, paranasal sinuses, and head in general. Although not well understood, during myocardial ischemia, the process of cardiac referred pain to craniofacial structures can be explained by the convergence of visceral and somatic relays at the trigeminal nucleus in the brain stem. The goal of this article is to review the possible pathways for referred jaw pain due to myocardial ischemia. Clin. Anat. 32:476-479, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Do femoral head collapse and the contralateral condition affect patient-reported quality of life and referral pain in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head?

PURPOSES: The objectives of this study were to investigate patient-reported outcomes and referral pain at the first visit in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and to clarify the influence of collapse of the femoral head and the contralateral condition. METHODS: The study included 105 patients (130 hips) with ONFH at the first visit, who were divided into two groups based on the presence of bilateral walking hip pain (bilateral group 25 patients, 50 hips) and unilateral hip pain (unilateral group 80 patients, 80 hips). We compared the Short Form-36 (SF-36), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), and visual analog scale (VAS) responses for hip, knee, and low back pain between the groups to investigate the influence of the contralateral condition. Regarding the influence of femoral head collapse, we investigated these subjects based on the stage classification in the unilateral group. RESULTS: The physical component summary (PCS) of the SF-36 and all domains of the JHEQ were poorer in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group. In addition, the VAS score for low back pain was significantly poorer in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group. Regarding the collapse of the femoral head, the SF-36 for the PCS and JHEQ for pain had a significant relationship in the ONFH stage. The VAS scores for hip and knee pain had a significant relationship in the ONFH stage. CONCLUSION: Collapse of the femoral head and the contralateral condition of ONFH strongly affect patients' activities of daily life.

Back Pain with Leg Pain.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The clinical diagnostic dilemma of low back pain that is associated with lower limb pain is very common. In relation to back pain that radiates to the leg, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) states: "Pain in the lower limb should be described specifically as either referred pain or radicular pain. In cases of doubt no implication should be made and the pain should be described as pain in the lower limb." RECENT FINDINGS: Bogduks' editorial in the journal PAIN (2009) helps us to differentiate and define the terms somatic referred pain, radicular pain, and radiculopathy. In addition, there are other pathologies distal to the nerve root that could be relevant to patients with back pain and leg pain such as plexus and peripheral nerve involvement. Hence, the diagnosis of back pain with leg pain can still be challenging. In this article, we present a patient with back and leg pain. The patient appears to have a radicular pain syndrome, but has no neurological impairment and shows signs of myofascial involvement. Is there a single diagnosis or indeed two overlapping syndromes? The scope of our article encompasses the common diagnostic possibilities for this type of patient. A discussion of treatment is beyond the scope of this article and depends on the final diagnosis/diagnoses made.

Shoulder Pain After Thoracic Surgery: Type and Time Course, a Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To study the time course of ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracic surgery with respect to incidence, pain intensity, type of pain (referred versus musculoskeletal), and surgical approach. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Odense University Hospital, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients for major lung resection. INTERVENTIONS: Postoperative observation of ipsilateral shoulder pain. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Postoperative numeric rating scale score of shoulder pain and thoracic pain and postoperative examination of the sites of shoulder pain for musculoskeletal involvement (muscle tenderness on palpation and movement) with follow-up 12 months after surgery. Clinically relevant pain was defined as a numeric rating scale score>3. Of the 60 patients included, 47 (78%) experienced ipsilateral shoulder pain, but only 25 (42%) reported clinically relevant shoulder pain. On postoperative day 4, 19 patients (32%) still suffered shoulder pain, but only 4 patients (7%) had clinically relevant pain. Four patients (8%) still suffered shoulder pain 12 months after surgery. In 26 patients (55%), the shoulder pain was classified as referred versus 21 patients (45%) who suffered shoulder pain of the musculoskeletal type. Shoulder pain of the musculoskeletal type was significantly more intense (p = 0.0008) than referred shoulder pain. CONCLUSION: Only a subset of patients has clinically relevant shoulder pain after postoperative day 2. Chronic shoulder pain is a minor problem after lobectomy and previously may have been overestimated. Ipsilateral shoulder pain of the musculoskeletal type is more intense than referred ipsilateral shoulder pain.

Bone scan usefulness in patients with painful hip or knee prosthesis: 10 situations that can cause pain, other than loosening and infection.

In recent years, with the higher median life expectancy, the number of hip and knee replacements has increased. Clinical examination and morphological studies are essential to evaluate patients with a painful arthroplasty. Nuclear medicine examinations also play an important role, their main usefulness being the exclusion of prosthesis complications. Nevertheless, conventional examinations, namely bone scan and white blood cell scintigraphy, can also identify complications, such as loosening and infection. This study describes the normal and pathologic patterns of a bone scan and exemplifies ten common situations that can cause pain in patients with hip or knee arthroplasty, other than loosening and infection, which can be disclosed on a bone scintigraphy. The ten situations that should be considered and looked for when analysing a bone scan are: referred pain, patellofemoral pain syndrome, fractures, fissures, abscess/haematoma, bone insert behaviour, heterotopic ossification, greater trochanter pseudarthrosis, osteoarthritis extension in a knee with an unicompartmental prosthesis, and systemic disease with bone involvement.

Referred leg pain originating from the sacroiliac joint: 6-month outcomes from the prospective randomized controlled iMIA trial.

BACKGROUND: The first results from the randomized, controlled iFuse Implant System Minimally Invasive Arthrodesis (iMIA) trial showed that minimally invasive surgical management (MISM) of low back pain originating from the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) by placing transarticular triangular titanium implants reduced pain more effectively than conservative management (CM). We now conducted a separate analysis of the iMIA data to assess whether the referred leg pain (RLP) component of SIJ-associated pain may also be affected by MISM or CM. METHODS: Data from 101 patients, recruited between June 2013 and May 2015 at nine European spine care centers, were included. Forty-nine patients were randomized to CM and 51 patients to MISM. RLP was defined as pain below the gluteal fold and assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Changes in RLP over 6 months were the primary endpoint. RESULTS: The prevalence of clinically significant RLP was 76.2 %. Over 6 months of follow-up, CM produced no significant change in RLP, which was 51.0 VAS points (interquartile range (IQR) 17.0-75.0) at baseline. In contrast, in the MISM cohort, we found a significant decrease in RLP from VAS 58.0 (IQR 24.5-80.0) at baseline to VAS 13.5 (IQR 0.0-39.3) after 6 months (p < 0.01). Improvement of RLP was associated only with the type of treatment (OR 5.04, p < 0.01), but not with patient age, sex, or different patterns of pain referral. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis shows that RLP is a frequent phenomenon in patients with SIJ-associated pain. At 6 months of follow-up, MISM helped relieve RLP more effectively than CM. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01741025.

Glenohumeral Joint Pain Referral Patterns: A Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: Pain diagrams are a useful tool to help physicians understand the varying presentation patterns of specific pain generators. This study is the first to describe the potential pain patterns of the glenohumeral joint (GHJ) based on responses to diagnostic image-guided GHJ injections. PURPOSE: To determine potential GHJ pain referral patterns. METHODS: 162 consecutive patients undergoing 168 GHJ injections recorded their preprocedure pain scores and drew accurate pain diagrams prior to undergoing fluoroscopically guided GHJ injections with local anesthetic. Postprocedure pain scores were recorded and those with complete relief were considered responders. Pain diagrams were overlaid via computer software to facilitate analysis and a composite pain map. A responder composite was also compared with a nonresponder composite. RESULTS: The GHJ was shown to cause pain in traditionally localized areas of the anterior and/or posterior shoulder and upper arm regions in 100% of patients who experienced complete pain relief after injection. Among 100% responders, 18% had neck pain and 6% had scapular pain. Pain was shown to radiate distally, with anterior forearm pain in 9%, posterior forearm pain in 8%, and hand pain in 9%. No patients with pain both in the medial neck and below the elbow were found to be 100% responders. Similarly, no patients were 100% responders if they had pain in the medial scapula and below the elbow, or medial scapula and medial neck. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior or posterior shoulder and upper arm pain, or a combination of the two, is the most common pain referral area from a symptomatic shoulder joint. Referral to the lateral neck, in combination with shoulder pain, was occasionally seen. Pain referral to the forearm and hand was less common. Rarely did a symptomatic shoulder joint refer pain to the scapula or to the medial neck.

Cancer and Referred Facial Pain.

Orofacial pain may be a symptom of diverse types of cancers as a result of local or distant tumor effects. The pain can be presented with the same characteristics as any other orofacial pain disorder, and this should be recognized by the clinician. Orofacial pain also can arise as a consequence of cancer therapy. In the present article, we review the mechanisms of cancer-associated facial pain, its clinical presentation, and cancer therapy associated with orofacial pain.

Referred pain location depends on the affected section of the sacroiliac joint.

PURPOSE: Pain referred from the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) may originate in the joint's posterior ligamentous region. The site of referred pain may depend on which SIJ section is affected. This study aimed to determine the exact origin of pain referred from four SIJ sections. METHODS: The study included 50 patients with SIJ dysfunction, confirmed by more than 70 % pain relief after periarticular injection of local anesthetic into the SIJ. The posterior SIJ was divided into four sections-upper, middle, lower, and other (cranial portion of the ilium outside the SIJ)-designated sections 1, 2, 3, and 0, respectively. We then inserted a needle into the periarticular SIJ under fluoroscopy. After the patient identified the area(s) in which the needle insertion produced referred pain, we injected a mixture of 2 % lidocaine and contrast medium into the corresponding SIJ section. RESULTS: Referred pain from SIJ section 0 was mainly located in the upper buttock along the iliac crest; pain from section 1, around the posterosuperior iliac spine; pain from section 2, in the middle buttock area; pain from section 3, in the lower buttock. In all, 22 (44.0 %) patients complained of groin pain, which was slightly relieved by lidocaine injection into SIJ sections 1 and 0. CONCLUSIONS: Dysfunctional upper sections of the SIJ are associated with pain in the upper buttock and lower sections with pain in the lower buttock. Groin pain might be referred from the upper SIJ sections.

[Pseudo-radicular referred leg pain]. / Pseudoradikulärer/übertragener Beinschmerz.

Pseudo-radicular leg pain as initially described by Bruegger more than 55 years ago was at that time a genius explanation for so many non-radicular pain syndromes that needed not any kind of surgical intervention but in first line a manual treatment or a treatment by therapeutic local anesthetics. Today we describe this pain as a "referred pain" originating from other anatomic structures that may occur during the development of chronic pain. Nevertheless this pain is found in many patients and it still seems to be a big problem for many physicians and surgeons. Imaging does not help either. The history and the clinical symptoms, the examinations, the chain reactions in the motor system as well as the treatment options from the point of view of manual medicine are described.

Headache: muscle tension, trigger points and referred pain.

Scientific interest in the pathogenesis of tension-type headache (TTH) has lagged behind that of migraine, although TTH is the most common headache disorder and considered the most important in terms of socioeconomic impact. As a result, understanding of the underlying mechanisms of TTH has remained relatively incomplete.

Myofascial trigger points in patients with whiplash-associated disorders and mechanical neck pain.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate pain patterns and the distribution of myofascial trigger points (MTPs) in whiplash-associated disorders (WADs II and III) as compared with mechanical neck pain (MNP). METHODS: Manual examination of suboccipital, upper trapezius, elevator scapula, temporalis, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, deltoid, and sternocleidomastoid muscles, was done to search for the presence of both active or latent MTPs in 49 WAD patients and 56 MNP patients. Local pain and referred pain from each active MTP was recorded on an anatomical map. RESULTS: The mean number of active MTPs was significantly greater in the WAD group (6.71 ± 0.79) than in the MNP group (3.26 ± 0.33) (P < 0.001), but this was not found for the latent MTPs (3.95 ± 0.57 vs. 2.82 ± 0.34; P > 0.05). In the WAD group, the current pain intensity (visual analogue scale) of the patients was significantly correlated with the number of active MTPs (rs = 0.03, P = 0.03) and the spontaneous pain area (rs = 0.25, P = 0.07), and the number of active MTPs was significantly correlated with the spontaneous pain area (rs = 0.3, P = 0.03). In the MNP group, significant correlation was found only between pain duration and spontaneous pain area (rs = 0.29, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Active MTPs are more prominent in WAD than MNP and related to current pain intensity and size of the spontaneous pain distribution in whiplash patients. This may underlie a lower degree of sensitization in MNP than in WAD.

Validity of a single-item measure to assess leg or back pain as the predominant symptom in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

PURPOSE: Recent studies suggest that the location of predominant pain (back or leg) can be a significant predictor of the outcome of surgery for degenerative spinal disorders. However, others challenge the notion that the predominant symptom can be reliably identified. This study examined the validity of a single item used to determine the most troublesome symptom. METHODS: A total of 2,778 patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine scheduled for surgery with the goal of pain relief completed a questionnaire enquiring as to their most troublesome symptom ["main symptom"; back pain (BACK) or leg/buttock pain (LEG)]. They also completed separate 0-10 graphic rating scales for back pain (LBP) and leg/buttock pain (LP) intensity. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the accuracy with which the "LP minus LBP" score was able to classify patients into their declared "main symptom" group. Sub-studies evaluated the test-retest reliability of the patients' self-rated pain scores (N = 45) and the agreement between the main symptom declared by the patient in the questionnaire and that documented by the surgeon after the clinical consultation (N = 118). RESULTS: Test-retest reliability of the back and leg pain scores was good (ICC2,1 of 0.8 for each), as was patient-surgeon agreement regarding the main symptom (BACK or LEG) (κ value 0.79). In the BACK group, the mean values for pain intensity were 7.3 ± 2.0 (LBP) and 5.2 ± 2.9 (LP); in the LEG group, they were 4.3 ± 2.9 (LBP) and 7.5 ± 1.9 (LP). The area under the curve for the ROC was 0.95 (95 % CI 0.94-0.95), indicating excellent discrimination between the BACK and LEG groups based on the "LP minus LBP" scores. A cutoff score >0.0 for "LP minus LBP" score gave optimal sensitivity and specificity for indicating membership of the LEG group (sensitivity 79.1%, specificity 95.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The responses on the single item for the "main symptom" were in good agreement with the differential ratings on the 0-10 pain scales for LBP and LP intensity. The cutoff >0 for "LP minus LBP" for classifying patients as LEG pain predominant seemed appropriate and suggests good concurrent validity for the single-item measure. The single item may be of use in sub-grouping patients with the same disorder (e.g. spondylolisthesis) or as an indication in surgical decision-making.

The tooth, the whole tooth, and nothing but the tooth: can dental pain ever be the sole presenting symptom of a myocardial infarction? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Pain symptoms related to cardiac ischemia can vary greatly from patient to patient. However, should emergency physicians consider the possibility of myocardial infarction in patients who present solely with dental pain? OBJECTIVE: This is a systematic review of the literature investigating the incidence of jaw, tooth, or facial pain as the sole symptom of cardiac ischemia. METHODS: Studies investigating jaw, tooth, or facial pain of cardiac origin were identified using the PubMed database. All English studies in which cardiac pain originated in the face, teeth, or jaw were screened for inclusion. Data were abstracted from each study utilizing a structured review process, and rated for methodological quality. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met study criteria: 16 were case reports, and the remaining 2 were prospective cohort studies. After quality assessment and categorization, nine reports were categorized as weak, eight moderate, and one strong methodological quality. CONCLUSION: Cardiac ischemia may present in no anatomic location other than face or jaw. However, despite frequent claims in the literature to the contrary, the lack of methodological quality of the studies investigated impedes a firm conclusion of face, jaw, or tooth pain as the only symptom of cardiac insufficiency.