Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 326
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr ; 234: 181-186.e1, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33753117

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize health care utilization and costs associated with care after diagnosis of Kawasaki disease including adherence to guidelines for echocardiograms. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed children hospitalized for Kawasaki disease using 2015-2017 national Truven MarketScan commercial claims data. The mean 90-day prehospitalization utilization and costs were quantified and compared with the 90 days posthospitalization via Wilcoxon 2-sample test. Adherence to echocardiogram guidelines was examined using multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with adherence. RESULTS: The mean total payments 90 days prior to hospitalization ($2090; n = 360) were significantly lower than those after discharge ($3778), though out of pocket costs were higher ($400 vs $270) (P < .0001). There was an increase in office visits, medical procedures, and echocardiograms after discharge. A majority of health care utilization before hospitalization occurred in the 7 days immediately prior to the date of admission; 51% obtained an echocardiogram within the first 2 weeks, and 14% were completely adherent with recommendations. Children with greater utilization prior to admission were more likely to adhere to American Heart Association guidelines for follow-up echocardiograms (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient health care expenditure nearly doubles after Kawasaki disease hospital discharge when compared with prehospitalization, suggesting the financial ramifications of this diagnosis persist beyond costs incurred during hospitalization. A significant portion of patients do not receive guideline recommended follow-up echocardiograms. This issue should be explored in more detail given the morbidity and mortality associated with this diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Ecocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome Mucocutáneo Linfonodular/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Mucocutáneo Linfonodular/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Niño , Preescolar , Ecocardiografía/economía , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/economía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Síndrome Mucocutáneo Linfonodular/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
2.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 57(6): 979-986, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32304621

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine if a policy of universal fetal echocardiography (echo) in pregnancies conceived by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) is cost-effective as a screening strategy for congenital heart defects (CHDs) and to examine the cost-effectiveness of various other CHD screening strategies in IVF pregnancies. METHODS: A decision-analysis model was designed from a societal perspective with respect to the obstetric patient, to compare the cost-effectiveness of three screening strategies: (1) anatomic ultrasound (US): selective fetal echo following abnormal cardiac findings on detailed anatomic survey; (2) intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) only: fetal echo for all pregnancies following IVF with ICSI; (3) all IVF: fetal echo for all IVF pregnancies. The model initiated at conception and had a time horizon of 1 year post-delivery. The sensitivities and specificities for each strategy, the probabilities of major and minor CHDs and all other clinical estimates were derived from the literature. Costs, including imaging, consults, surgeries and caregiver productivity losses, were derived from the literature and Medicare databases, and are expressed in USA dollars ($). Effectiveness was quantified as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), based on how the strategies would affect the quality of life of the obstetric patient. Secondary effectiveness was quantified as number of cases of CHD and, specifically, cases of major CHD, detected. RESULTS: The average base-case cost of each strategy was as follows: anatomic US, $8119; ICSI only, $8408; and all IVF, $8560. The effectiveness of each strategy was as follows: anatomic US, 1.74487 QALYs; ICSI only, 1.74497 QALYs; and all IVF, 1.74499 QALYs. The ICSI-only strategy had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $2 840 494 per additional QALY gained when compared to the anatomic-US strategy, and the all-IVF strategy had an ICER of $5 692 457 per additional QALY when compared with the ICSI-only strategy. Both ICERs exceeded considerably the standard willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000-$100 000 per QALY. In a secondary analysis, the ICSI-only strategy had an ICER of $527 562 per additional case of major CHD detected when compared to the anatomic-US strategy. All IVF had an ICER of $790 510 per case of major CHD detected when compared with ICSI only. It was determined that it would cost society five times more to detect one additional major CHD through intensive screening of all IVF pregnancies than it would cost to pay for the neonate's first year of care. CONCLUSION: The most cost-effective method of screening for CHDs in pregnancies following IVF, either with or without ICSI, is to perform a fetal echo only when abnormal cardiac findings are noted on the detailed anatomy scan. Performing routine fetal echo for all IVF pregnancies is not cost-effective. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Ecocardiografía/economía , Femenino , Cardiopatías Congénitas/economía , Humanos , Embarazo , Calidad de Vida , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/economía , Estados Unidos
3.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 55(6): 758-767, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31945242

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the recommended three-view fetal heart screening method to detect major congenital heart disease (CHD) with more elaborate screening strategies to determine the cost-effective strategy in unselected (low-risk) pregnancies. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was designed to compare four screening strategies to identify fetuses with major CHD in a theoretical cohort of 4 000 000 births in the USA. The four strategies were: (1) three views: four-chamber view (4CV) and views of the left (LVOT) and right (RVOT) ventricular outflow tracts; (2) five views: 4CV, LVOT, RVOT and longitudinal views of the ductal arch and aortic arch; (3) five axial views: 4CV, LVOT, RVOT, three-vessel (3V) view and three-vessels-and-trachea view; and (4) six views: 4CV, LVOT, RVOT and 3V views and longitudinal views of the ductal arch and aortic arch. Outcomes related to neonatal mortality and neurodevelopmental disability were evaluated. The analysis was performed from a healthcare-system perspective, with a cost-effectiveness willingness-to-pay threshold set at $100 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Baseline analysis, one-way sensitivity analysis and Monte-Carlo simulation were performed. RESULTS: In our baseline model, screening with five axial views was the optimal strategy, detecting 3520 more CHDs, and resulting in 259 fewer children with neurodevelopmental disability, 40 fewer neonatal deaths and only slightly higher costs, compared with screening with the currently recommended three views. Screening with six views was more effective, but also cost considerably more, compared with screening with five axial views, and had an incremental cost of $490 023/QALY, which was over the willingness-to-pay threshold. The five-view strategy was dominated by the other three strategies, i.e. it was more costly and less effective in comparison. The data were robust when tested with Monte-Carlo and one-way sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Although current guidelines recommend a minimum of three views for detecting CHD during the mid-trimester anatomy scan, screening with five axial views is a cost-effective strategy that may lead to improved outcome compared with three-view screening. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía/economía , Corazón Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Femenino , Corazón Fetal/embriología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/embriología , Humanos , Método de Montecarlo , Embarazo , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos
4.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 56(5): 705-716, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31614030

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of different follow-up strategies for non-obese and obese women who had incomplete fetal cardiac screening for major congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Three decision-analytic models, one each for non-obese, obese and Class-III-obese women, were developed to compare five follow-up strategies for initial suboptimal fetal cardiac screening. The five strategies were: (1) no follow-up ultrasound (US) examination but direct referral to fetal echocardiography (FE); (2) one follow-up US, then FE if fetal cardiac views were still suboptimal; (3) up to two follow-up US, then FE if fetal cardiac views were still suboptimal; (4) one follow-up US and no FE; and (5) up to two follow-up US and no FE. The models were designed to identify fetuses with major CHD in a theoretical cohort of 4 000 000 births in the USA. Outcomes related to neonatal mortality and neurodevelopmental disability were evaluated. A cost-effectiveness willingness-to-pay threshold was set at US$100 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Base-case and sensitivity analysis and Monte-Carlo simulation were performed. RESULTS: In our base-case models for all body mass index (BMI) groups, no follow-up US, but direct referral to FE led to the best outcomes, detecting 7%, 25% and 82% more fetuses with CHD in non-obese, obese and Class-III-obese women, respectively, compared with the baseline strategy of one follow-up US and no FE. However, no follow-up US, but direct referral to FE was above the US$100 000/QALY threshold and therefore not cost-effective. The cost-effective strategy for all BMI groups was one follow-up US and no FE. Both up to two follow-up US with no FE and up to two follow-up US with FE were dominated (being more costly and less effective), while one follow-up US with FE was over the cost-effectiveness threshold. One follow-up US and no FE was the optimal strategy in 97%, 93% and 86% of trials in Monte-Carlo simulation for non-obese, obese and Class-III-obese models, respectively. CONCLUSION: For both non-obese and obese women with incomplete fetal cardiac screening, the optimal CHD follow-up screening strategy is no further US and immediate referral to FE; however, this strategy is not cost-effective. Considering costs, one follow-up US and no FE is the preferred strategy. For both obese and non-obese women, Monte-Carlo simulations showed clearly that one follow-up US and no FE was the optimal strategy. Both non-obese and obese women with initial incomplete cardiac screening examination should therefore be offered one follow-up US. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/economía , Ecocardiografía/economía , Corazón Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obesidad Materna/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/economía , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Corazón Fetal/embriología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías Congénitas/economía , Cardiopatías Congénitas/embriología , Humanos , Lactante , Mortalidad Infantil , Recién Nacido , Método de Montecarlo , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/economía , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/etiología , Obesidad Materna/fisiopatología , Embarazo , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
5.
J Asthma ; 57(11): 1195-1201, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288567

RESUMEN

Objective: Patients hospitalized for asthma can exhibit concurrent cardiac symptoms and undergo cardiac work up. We identify patients admitted for asthma that underwent cardiac workup and describe outcomes to evaluate the utility of cardiac testing in this population.Methods: Patients aged 4 to 17 years admitted for status asthmaticus from 2012 - 2016 were screened for EKG, ECHO, or cardiac enzyme obtainment.Results: Out of 1296 patients, 77 (6%) received cardiac testing. The most common reasons for testing were chest pain (25, 32%), blood pressure abnormalities (11, 14%), tachycardia (8, 10%), arrhythmia (6, 8%), and syncope (6, 8%). Sinus tachycardia (43, 66%) was the most common EKG finding. 4 out of 27 patients who underwent ECHOs had abnormalities: 2 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), 1 with vascular ring, and 1 with evidence of pulmonary hypertension. All patients who underwent an EKG to evaluate tachycardia had normalization of heart rate at discharge. Cardiac ischemia was not evident in any patients who underwent workup with cardiac enzymes to evaluate chest pain. All cases of arrhythmias resolved on discharge. Diastolic hypotension (DhTN) was found in 10 out of the 11 blood pressure abnormalities. There was mixed efficacy of fluid bolus in correcting DhTN. All DhTN resolved on discharge. One patient with syncope had a new diagnosis of HCM.Conclusions: While cardiac complications are seen in patients admitted for status asthmaticus, the etiology rarely stems from underlying cardiac disease. EKGs, ECHOs, and cardiac enzymes should have a minimal role in the management of the hospitalized asthmatic patient.


Asunto(s)
Asma/complicaciones , Ecocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Electrocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Asma/sangre , Asma/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Ecocardiografía/economía , Electrocardiografía/economía , Femenino , Cardiopatías/sangre , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Cardiopatías/etiología , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Brote de los Síntomas , Centros de Atención Terciaria/economía , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Troponina I/sangre , Troponina T/sangre
6.
Intern Med J ; 49(6): 781-785, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31185523

RESUMEN

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is an important cause of death and disability in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Yearly screening of all SSc patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is recommended in international guidelines and currently utilised by the Australian Scleroderma Interest Group (ASIGSTANDARD ). Owing to the limitations of TTE, the ASIG developed a new screening algorithm (ASIGPROPOSED ) utilising a serum biomarker, NT-proBNP, in place of TTE, which has been shown to be equally accurate as the current algorithm. The aim of this study was to compare the cost of these two algorithms using different scenarios. The new algorithm resulted in significant yearly cost savings of between AU$42 913.35 and AU$84 570 in screening and diagnosis of an Australian cohort which, if extrapolated to the Australian population, would result in a yearly cost saving of between AU$367 066 and AU$725 564. There was no scenario in which the proposed algorithm did not result in a cost saving.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Ahorro de Costo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico , Australia , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Diagnóstico Precoz , Ecocardiografía/economía , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/sangre , Fragmentos de Péptidos/sangre , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/economía , Esclerodermia Sistémica/economía
7.
Am J Perinatol ; 36(12): 1216-1222, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30991442

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD) using screening methods including a combination of elevated hemoglobin A1c, detailed anatomy ultrasound, and fetal echocardiography. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of all pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes from January 2012 to December 2016. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for each screening regimen. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for each regimen with effectiveness defined as additional CHD diagnosed. RESULTS: A total of 378 patients met inclusion criteria with an overall prevalence of CHD of 4.0% (n = 15). When compared with a detailed ultrasound, fetal echocardiography had a higher sensitivity (73.3 vs. 40.0%). However, all cases of major CHD were detected by detailed ultrasound (n = 6). Using an elevated early A1c > 7.7% and a detailed ultrasound resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 60.0 and 99.4%, respectively. The use of selective fetal echocardiography for an A1c > 7.7% or abnormal detailed anatomy ultrasound would result in a 63.3% reduction in cost per each additional minor CHD diagnosed (ICER: $18,290.52 vs. $28,875.67). CONCLUSION: Fetal echocardiography appears to have limited diagnostic value in women with pregestational diabetes. However, these results may not be generalizable outside of a high-volume academic setting.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía/economía , Corazón Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo en Diabéticas , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/economía , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Embarazo , Embarazo en Diabéticas/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
8.
Heart Lung Circ ; 28(9): 1427-1435, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31272827

RESUMEN

The majority of global cardiovascular disease burden occurs in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and indigenous populations. Although common diseases, such as ischaemic heart disease, cause significant burden, there are also neglected diseases. Forgotten by many, these diseases-including rheumatic heart disease, endomyocardial fibrosis and Chagas cardiomyopathy-continue to take a tremendous toll on a large proportion of the world's population. Whilst the technology of echocardiography continues to evolve in many high-income countries, low resource countries are working out how to make this vital tool available and affordable for the most remote and poorest populations. This paper aims to highlight the neglected cardiovascular diseases and their echocardiographic features. It also highlights the latest research in relation to portable echocardiography, task shifting and disease screening. The authors make recommendations in relation to future directions, including making echocardiography an affordable and accessible tool for all.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Chagásica , Ecocardiografía/economía , Fibrosis Endomiocárdica , Pobreza , Cardiopatía Reumática , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/economía , Fibrosis Endomiocárdica/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrosis Endomiocárdica/economía , Humanos , Cardiopatía Reumática/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatía Reumática/economía
9.
J Pediatr ; 190: 43-48, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28888565

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency, yield, and cost of echocardiograms meeting "rarely appropriate" criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center study of pediatric patients presenting with syncope. Patients were categorized according to the appropriate use criteria and based upon location of care (emergency department only, primary care setting only, or referred to a pediatric cardiologist). Multivariable regression was used to determine factors associated with performance of a "rarely appropriate" echocardiogram. Costs were calculated using fair market values from the Healthcare Bluebook. RESULTS: The cohort included 637 patients presenting with syncope during the 1-year study. Echocardiograms were ordered for 127 of 637 (20.1%) including 0 of 328 emergency department patients, 1 of 66 (1.5%) primary care setting patients, and 127 of 243 (52.3%) patients evaluated by a pediatric cardiologist. Use of echocardiography by pediatric cardiologists was categorized as "appropriate" in 92 of 127 (72.4%), "maybe appropriate" in 6 of 127 (4.7%), and "rarely appropriate" in 29 of 127 (22.8%). Abnormal findings were seen in 6 of 127 (4.7%) echocardiograms but in none of the "rarely appropriate" studies. In multivariable analysis, female sex and younger age were the only factors associated with performance of a "rarely appropriate" echocardiogram. "Rarely appropriate" echocardiograms cost an estimated $16 704.00 ($576.00 per patient) in the 1-year study. CONCLUSIONS: "Rarely appropriate" echocardiograms performed for syncope do not contribute management changing diagnostic information. However, they burden patients with additional cost and perhaps contribute to increased need for follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía/métodos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Síncope/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Ecocardiografía/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
Am J Emerg Med ; 35(2): 281-284, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27838041

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Despite the low diagnostic yield of echocardiogra0, it is often used in the evaluation of syncope. This study determined whether patients without abnormalities in the initial evaluation benefit from transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and the clinical factors predicting an abnormal TTE. METHODS: This study enrolled 241 patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope. The TTE results were analyzed based on risk factors suggesting cardiogenic syncope in the initial evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 115 patients with at least one risk factor, 97 underwent TTE and 27 (27.8%) had TTE abnormalities. In comparison, of the 126 patients without risk factors, 47 underwent TTE and only 1 (2.1%) had TTE abnormalities. Significantly different factors between patients with normal and abnormal TTE findings were entered in a multiple logistic regression analysis, which yielded age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.15; p=0.006], an abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) (aOR, 7.44; 95% CI, 1.77-31.26; p=0.010), and a brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level of >100pg/mL (aOR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.21-5.73; p=0.011) as independent predictors of TTE abnormalities. The cutoff value of age predicting an abnormal TTE was 59.0years (area under the curve, 0.777; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A patient who is older than 59years or has an abnormal ECG or an elevated BNP level may benefit from TTE. Otherwise, TTE should be deferred in patients with no risk factors in the initial evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Síncope/etiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ecocardiografía/economía , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Electrocardiografía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Hematócrito/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Síntomas Prodrómicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Distribución por Sexo , Síncope/diagnóstico , Troponina I/sangre
11.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 19(10): 102, 2017 09 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28879526

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With an increasing number of interventional procedures performed for structural heart disease and cardiac arrhythmias each year, echocardiographic guidance is necessary for safe and efficient results. The purpose of this review article is to overview the principles of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and describes the peri-interventional role of ICE in a variety of structural heart disease and electrophysiological interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Both transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography have limitations. ICE provides the advantage of imaging from within the heart, providing shorter image distances and higher resolution. ICE may be performed without sedation and avoids esophageal intubation as with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Limitations of ICE include the need for additional venous access with possibility of vascular complications, potentially higher costs, and a learning curve for new operators. Data supports the use of ICE in guiding device closure of interatrial shunts, transseptal puncture, and electrophysiologic procedures. This paper reviews the more recent reports that ICE may be used for primary guidance or as a supplement to TEE in patients undergoing left atrial appendage (LAA) closure, interatrial shunt closure, transaortic valve implantation (TAVI), percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR), paravalvular leak (PVL) closure, aortic interventions, transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (tPVR), ventricular septal defect (VSD), and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure. ICE imaging technology will continue to expand and help improve structural heart and electrophysiology interventions.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía/métodos , Endosonografía , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Corazón/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Ecocardiografía/efectos adversos , Ecocardiografía/economía , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Fenómenos Electrofisiológicos , Endosonografía/efectos adversos , Endosonografía/economía , Cardiopatías/terapia , Defectos del Tabique Interatrial/cirugía , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
12.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 38(1): 162-169, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27826707

RESUMEN

Multiple reports have shown that echocardiograms are neither cost-effective nor of high diagnostic yield for a number of indications. This study sought to evaluate the impact of indications and provider type on the diagnostic yield of first-time outpatient pediatric echocardiograms. All initial echocardiograms interpreted at our institution from February 2009 to December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Positive findings were defined as any abnormality of structure or function. Ordering physicians were grouped as Primary Care, Subspecialist, or Cardiologist. A cost analysis of cardiac consultation versus direct echocardiogram ordering was performed using 2014 Arkansas Medicaid office-based allowables. A total of 7854 echocardiograms had complete data and were included in the study. Median age was 7.2 years (range 2 days to 18.9 years). There were 1179 (15%) abnormal first-time echocardiograms. Diagnostic yields were particularly low for the indications of chest pain (4.9%), syncope (5.3%), and palpitations (9.1%). When ordered by the Cardiology group, echocardiographic yields were increased 35% for all indications (p < 0.001) and 100% for murmurs (p < 0.001) when compared to the Primary Care group. Cost analysis using the model of cardiology consultation rather than direct primary care echocardiogram ordering estimated a 19.6% reduction in medical costs for the most common indication, murmur. The diagnostic yield of outpatient pediatric echocardiograms is low for most indications. Overall, cardiologists had an improved diagnostic yield compared to other ordering physicians. For the indication of murmur, cardiology evaluation before echocardiogram might decrease unnecessary testing and healthcare expenses. This study provides a framework for improving resource utilization in the pediatric population.


Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Arkansas , Niño , Preescolar , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Ecocardiografía/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 15: 48, 2016 Mar 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27001409

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF), especially with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common in older patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), but often not recognized. Early HF detection in older T2DM patients may be worthwhile because treatment may be initiated in an early stage, with clear beneficial treatment in those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but without clear prognostic beneficial treatment in those with HFpEF. Because both types of HF may be uncovered in older T2DM, screening may improve health outcomes at acceptable costs. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of five screening strategies in patients with T2DM aged 60 years or over. METHODS: We built a Markov model with a lifetime horizon based on the prognostic results from our screening study of 581 patients with T2DM, extended with evidence from literature. Cost-effectiveness was calculated from a Dutch healthcare perspective as additional costs (Euros) per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. We performed probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess robustness of these outcomes. Scenario analyses were performed to assess the influence of the availability of effective treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. RESULTS: For willingness to pay values in the range of €6050/QALY-€31,000/QALY for men and €6300/QALY-€42,000/QALY for women, screening-based checking the electronic medical record for patient characteristics and medical history plus the assessment of symptoms had the highest probability of being cost-effective. For higher willingness-to-pay values, direct echocardiography was the preferred screening strategy. Cost-effectiveness of all screening strategies improved with the increase in effectiveness of treatment for HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for HF in older community-dwelling patients with T2DM is cost-effective at the commonly used willingness-to-pay threshold of €20.000/QALY by checking the electronic medical record for patient characteristics and medical history plus the assessment of symptoms. The simplicity of such a strategy makes it feasible for implementation in existing primary care diabetes management programs.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Ecocardiografía/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Factores de Edad , Simulación por Computador , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Diagnóstico Precoz , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Países Bajos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Postgrad Med J ; 92(1090): 450-4, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26896441

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of heart disease is changing, with rheumatic heart disease becoming less common but degenerative valve disorders, heart failure and atrial fibrillation (AF) increasing. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the prevalence of structural cardiac abnormalities in the apparently symptom-free adult population within our prospective echocardiography (echo) registry. METHODS: Our echo registry comprised echo studies and associated demographic and clinical data obtained prospectively from 362 consecutive asymptomatic subjects aged 50-74 years and without known heart disease referred between 2011 and 2012 from general practices in the South East of England. RESULTS: 221 echo abnormalities were detected in 178 (49%) subjects (46% men; mean (±SD) age 63.9±9.2 years; 98% Caucasian). A major abnormality was detected in seven subjects: four had a large secundum atrial septal defect, one had critical aortic stenosis, one severe mitral regurgitation and one features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Twelve subjects had left ventricular systolic dysfunction with an ejection fraction (EF) <50% (of whom 10 had EF <40%). Four subjects had AF. Minor echo abnormalities were evident in the remaining 171 (47%) subjects. Abnormalities were commoner in patients with cardiovascular risk factors or a history of cardiac disease than in those without (53% vs 38%). In multivariate analyses stratified by gender, for women, increased age (F=33.3, p<0.001) and systolic blood pressure (F=9.2, p=0.003) were associated with abnormal echo findings; for men, increased age (F=12.0, p<0.001) and lower cholesterol (F=4.2, p=0.042) predicted an increase in abnormal findings on echo. CONCLUSIONS: Unrecognised cardiac abnormalities are very common in middle-aged men and women with no overt symptoms. Echo offers the potential to identify the need for early intervention and treatment to improve cardiovascular outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía , Soplos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tamizaje Masivo , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ecocardiografía/economía , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Soplos Cardíacos/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Ann Intern Med ; 162(7): 474-84, 2015 Apr 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25844996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal imaging strategy for patients with stable chest pain is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of different imaging strategies for patients with stable chest pain. DESIGN: Microsimulation state-transition model. DATA SOURCES: Published literature. TARGET POPULATION: 60-year-old patients with a low to intermediate probability of coronary artery disease (CAD). TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: The United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. INTERVENTION: Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography, cardiac stress magnetic resonance imaging, stress single-photon emission CT, and stress echocardiography. OUTCOME MEASURES: Lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: The strategy that maximized QALYs and was cost-effective in the United States and the Netherlands began with coronary CT angiography, continued with cardiac stress imaging if angiography found at least 50% stenosis in at least 1 coronary artery, and ended with catheter-based coronary angiography if stress imaging induced ischemia of any severity. For U.K. men, the preferred strategy was optimal medical therapy without catheter-based coronary angiography if coronary CT angiography found only moderate CAD or stress imaging induced only mild ischemia. In these strategies, stress echocardiography was consistently more effective and less expensive than other stress imaging tests. For U.K. women, the optimal strategy was stress echocardiography followed by catheter-based coronary angiography if echocardiography induced mild or moderate ischemia. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Results were sensitive to changes in the probability of CAD and assumptions about false-positive results. LIMITATIONS: All cardiac stress imaging tests were assumed to be available. Exercise electrocardiography was included only in a sensitivity analysis. Differences in QALYs among strategies were small. CONCLUSION: Coronary CT angiography is a cost-effective triage test for 60-year-old patients who have nonacute chest pain and a low to intermediate probability of CAD. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Erasmus University Medical Center.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diagnóstico por Imagen/economía , Simulación por Computador , Angiografía Coronaria/economía , Ecocardiografía/economía , Electrocardiografía , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/economía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economía
16.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 18(9): 93, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27553788

RESUMEN

The current climate in healthcare is increasingly emphasizing a value-based approach to diagnostic testing. Cardiac imaging, including echocardiography, has been a primary target of ongoing reforms in healthcare delivery and reimbursement. The Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for echocardiography is a physician-derived tool intended to guide utilization in optimal patient care. To date, the AUC have primarily been employed solely as justification for reimbursement, though evolving broader applications to guide clinical decision-making suggest a far more valuable role in the delivery of high-quality and high-value healthcare.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca/economía , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca/normas , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca/tendencias , Ecocardiografía/economía , Ecocardiografía/normas , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Regionalización , Compra Basada en Calidad
17.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 18(5): 45, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27002621

RESUMEN

Improvements in the outcomes of surgical and catheter-based interventions and medical therapy have led to a growing population of adult patients with congenital heart disease. Adult patients with previously undiagnosed congenital heart disease or those previously palliated or repaired may have challenging echocardiographic examinations. Understanding the distinct anatomic and hemodynamic features of the congenital anomaly and quantifying ventricular function and valvular dysfunction plays an important role in the management of these patients. Rapid advances in imaging technology with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) allow for improved visualization of complex cardiac anatomy in the evaluation of this unique patient population. Although echocardiography remains the most widely used imaging tool to evaluate congenital heart disease, alternative and, at times, complimentary imaging modalities should be considered. When caring for adults with congenital heart disease, it is important to choose the proper imaging study that can answer the clinical question with the highest quality images, lowest risk to the patient, and in a cost-efficient manner.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Adulto , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/economía , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ecocardiografía/economía , Cardiopatías Congénitas/economía , Cardiopatías Congénitas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética/economía
18.
Am Heart J ; 170(4): 805-11, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26386805

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rapid growth in the provision of cardiac imaging tests has led to concerns about overuse. Little is known about the degree to which health care delivery system characteristics influence use and variation in echocardiography. METHODS: We analyzed administrative claims of veterans with heart failure older than 65 years from 2007 to 2010 across 34 metropolitan service areas (MSAs). We compared overall rates and geographic variation in use of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) between veterans who used the Veterans Health Administration (VA) and propensity-matched veterans who used Medicare. "Dual users" were excluded. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics or mortality between the propensity-matched cohorts (overall n = 30,404 veterans, mean age 76 years, mortality rate 52%). The Medicare cohort had a significantly higher overall rate of TTE use compared with the VA cohort (1.25 vs 0.38 TTEs per person-year, incidence rate ratio 2.89 [95% CI 2.80-3.00], both P < .001), but a similar coefficient of variation across MSAs (0.36 [95% CI 0.27-0.45] vs 0.48 [95% CI 0.37-0.59]). There was a moderate to strong correlation in variation at the MSA level between cohorts (Spearman r = 0.58, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Overall rates of TTE use were significantly higher in a Medicare cohort compared with a propensity score-matched VA cohort of veterans with heart failure living in urban areas, with similar relative degrees of geographic variation and moderate to strong regional correlation. Rates of TTE use may be strongly influenced by health care system characteristics, but local practice styles influence echocardiography rates irrespective of health system.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos , Anciano , Ecocardiografía/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
19.
Gynecol Oncol ; 137(3): 503-7, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25735254

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to examine the safety and cost savings of selective cardiac surveillance (CS) during treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). METHODS: A retrospective, dual institution study of women receiving PLD for the treatment of a gynecologic malignancy was performed. The study period was 2002-2014. At both institutions, a selective strategy for CS was implemented in which only high-risk women with a cardiac history or with symptoms suggestive of cardiac toxicity during PLD treatment underwent a cardiac evaluation. Patient demographics, clinical and treatment history were evaluated. Cost analyses were performed utilizing professional/technical fee rates for echocardiogram and multi-gated acquisition scan for each state. RESULTS: PLD was administered in 184 women. The mean patient age was 62.7years, and 79% were treated for recurrent ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma. The median cumulative administered dose of PLD was 300mg/m(2); 24 received >550mg/m(2). The median follow-up time was 20months. Of the 184 patients, the majority (n=157, 85.3%) did not undergo either an initial cardiac evaluation or surveillance during or post-PLD treatment. Fifty-three patients considered high risk for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity underwent CS. Only three patients (1.6%) in the entire cohort developed CHF that was possibly related to PLD treatment; all had significant pre-existing cardiac risk factors. Selective instead of routine use of CS in the study population resulted in a cost savings of $182,552.28. CONCLUSION: Utilizing cardiac surveillance in select women undergoing PLD treatment for gynecologic malignancies resulted in significant health care cost savings without adversely impacting clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Cardiotoxicidad/diagnóstico , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Cardiotoxicidad/economía , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Ecocardiografía/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
20.
Intern Med J ; 45(11): 1134-40, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26337683

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Screening for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is now standard care in this disease. The existing Australian Scleroderma Interest Group algorithm (ASIGSTANDARD ) is based on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and pulmonary function tests (PFT). Recently, ASIG has derived and validated a new screening algorithm (ASIGPROPOSED ) that incorporates N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level together with PFT in order to decrease reliance on TTE, which has some limitations. Right heart catheterisation (RHC) remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of PAH in patients who screen 'positive'. AIM: To compare the cost of PAH screening in SSc with ASIGSTANDARD and ASIGPROPOSED algorithms. METHODS: We applied both ASIGSTANDARD and ASIGPROPOSED algorithms to 643 screen-naïve SSc patients from the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study (ASCS), assuming a PAH prevalence of 10%. We compared the costs of screening, the number of TTE required and both the total number of RHC required and the number of RHC needed to diagnose one case of PAH, and costs, according to each algorithm. We then extrapolated the costs to the estimated total Australian SSc population. RESULTS: In screen-naïve patients from the ASCS, ASIGPROPOSED resulted in 64% fewer TTE and 10% fewer RHC compared with ASIGSTANDARD , with $1936 (15%) saved for each case of PAH diagnosed. When the costs were extrapolated to the entire Australian SSc population, there was an estimated screening cost saving of $946 000 per annum with ASIGPROPOSED , with a cost saving of $851 400 in each subsequent year of screening. CONCLUSIONS: ASIGPROPOSED substantially reduces the number of TTE and RHC required and results in substantial cost savings in SSc-PAH screening compared with ASIGSTANDARD .


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Ahorro de Costo/métodos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Esclerodermia Sistémica/economía , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Ecocardiografía/economía , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/economía , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/métodos , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda