Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Miniaturized Robotic-Assisted Surgery System in Colectomy: A Prospective, Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Study Using the IDEAL Framework.

BACKGROUND: Robotics has increased rates of minimally invasive surgery, with distinct advantages over open surgery. However, current commercially available robotic platforms have device and system issues that limit robotic-assisted surgery expansion. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device in colectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, Investigational Device Exemption clinical study following the idea, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term follow-up framework (stage 2b, exploration). SETTINGS: Three centers with high-volume robotic colorectal cases and surgeons. PATIENTS: Patients scheduled for a right or left colectomy for benign or malignant disease. INTERVENTION: Colectomy with the novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For safety, intraoperative and device-related adverse events and 30-day morbidity. For efficacy, successful completion of predefined procedural steps without conversion. RESULTS: Thirty patients (13 women, 17 men) were analyzed. The mean age was 59.4 (SD 13.4) years. Seventy percent of patients (n = 21) were overweight/obese and 53.3% of patients (n = 16) had prior abdominal surgery. Forty percent of patients had malignant and 60% had benign disease. Cases were 15 right and 15 left colectomies. Overall operative time was a median of 146 (range, 80-309) minutes; console time was 70 (range, 34-174) minutes. There were no conversions to open surgery and no intraoperative or device-related adverse events. In 100% of patients (n = 30), the primary dissection was completed, and hemostasis was maintained with the novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device. The morbidity rate was 26.7% minor and 3.3% major. The median length of stay was 2 days. There were no mortalities. LIMITATIONS: Single-arm study, short-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This first clinical study of a novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device along the IDEAL framework demonstrated that it was safe and effective. Given this success, further assessment and long-term follow-up of the miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device are planned for comparative clinical and economic effectiveness in colorectal surgery. See Video Abstract . SEGURIDAD Y EFICACIA DE UN NOVEDOSO SISTEMA DE CIRUGA ASISTIDA POR ROBOT MINIATURIZADO EN COLECTOMA UN ESTUDIO CLNICO PROSPECTIVO DE INVESTIGACIN DE EXENCIN DE DISPOSITIVO QUE UTILIZA EL MARCO IDEAL: ANTECEDENTES:La robótica ha aumentado las tasas de cirugía mínimamente invasiva, con claras ventajas sobre la cirugía abierta. Sin embargo, las plataformas robóticas actualmente disponibles comercialmente tienen problemas con los dispositivos y sistemas que limitan la expansión de la cirugía asistida por robot.OBJETIVO:Demostrar la seguridad y eficacia de un novedoso dispositivo de cirugía asistida por robot miniaturizado en colectomía.DISEÑO:Estudio clínico prospectivo de investigación de exención de dispositivo siguiendo el marco IDEAL (Etapa 2b, exploración).ESCENARIO:Tres centros con cirujanos y casos colorrectales robóticos de gran volumen.PACIENTES:Pacientes programados para colectomía derecha o izquierda por enfermedad benigna o maligna.INTERVENCIÓN:Colectomía con el nuevo dispositivo de cirugía asistida por robot miniaturizado.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Para la seguridad, eventos adversos intraoperatorios y relacionados con el dispositivo y morbilidad a 30 días. Para la evaluación de la eficacia, la finalización exitosa de los pasos predefinidos sin conversión.RESULTADOS:Se analizaron treinta pacientes (13 mujeres, 17 hombres). La edad media fue 59,4 (DE 13,4) años. El 70% (n=21) tenía sobrepeso/obesidad y el 53,3% (n=16) había tenido cirugía abdominal previa. El 40% tenía enfermedad maligna y el 60% benigna. Los casos fueron 15 colectomías derechas y 15 izquierdas. La mediana del tiempo operatorio general fue de 146 (rango, 80-309) minutos; 70 (rango, 34-174) minutos fue el tiempo de consola. No hubo conversiones a cirugía abierta ni eventos adversos intraoperatorios o relacionados con el dispositivo. En el 100% (n=30), se completó la disección primaria y se mantuvo la hemostasia con el novedoso dispositivo de cirugía asistida por robot miniaturizado. La tasa de morbilidad menor fue de un 26,7% y mayor un 3,3%. La mediana de estadía fue de 2 días. No hubo mortalidad.LIMITACIONES:Estudio de un solo brazo, corto plazo de seguimiento.CONCLUSIONES:Este primer estudio clínico de un novedoso dispositivo de cirugía asistida por robot miniaturizado según el marco IDEAL demostró que era seguro y eficaz. Dado este éxito, se planean evaluaciones adicionales y seguimiento a largo plazo del dispositivo de cirugía asistida por robot miniaturizado para comparar la efectividad clínica y económica en la cirugía colorrectal. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis: an updated review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize recent literature on the surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis. RECENT FINDINGS: The last decade has seen a surge in the number of studies on bowel endometriosis, with a focus on preoperative evaluation, perioperative management, surgical approach, and surgical outcomes. Many of these studies have originated from large-volume referral centers with varying surgical approaches and philosophies. Colorectal surgery for endometriosis seems to have a positive impact on patient symptoms, quality of life, and fertility. However, these benefits must be weighed against a significant risk of postoperative complications and the potential for long-term bowel or bladder dysfunction, especially for more radical procedures involving the lower rectum. Importantly, most studies regarding surgical technique and outcomes have been limited by their observational design. SUMMARY: The surgical management of bowel endometriosis is complex and should be approached by a multidisciplinary team. Methodical preoperative evaluation, including appropriate imaging, is vital for surgical planning and patient counseling. The decision to perform a more conservative or radical excision is nuanced and remains an area of controversy. High quality studies in the form of multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed before clear recommendations can be made.

Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis Complicated With Sinistral Portal Hypertension And Mechanical Obstruction Of The Colon: A Case Report.

Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) is often associated with acute necrotic collection (ANC) or walled-off necrosis (WON). Due to the close anatomical connection between the pancreas, the spleen, and the transverse colon, necrotizing pancreatitis is often combined with spleen or colon involvement. Gastrointestinal dysfunction usually caused by pancreatitis leads to paralytic intestinal obstruction. However, pancreatitis combined with mechanical colonic obstruction is extremely rare. It can easily be misdiagnosed as malignant intestinal obstruction, and diagnosing the cause of intestinal obstruction becomes more critical when accompanied by Sinistral portal hypertension (SPH). Surgical resection is the primary method for the previous occurrence of colonic complications. In this case report, upon admission, a 37-year-old patient was diagnosed with acute necrotizing pancreatitis with sinistral portal hypertension. On the 6th day after admission, the patient developed a sudden colonic obstruction. After identifying the cause, the patient underwent a transanal decompression tube and minimally invasive necrosectomy, avoiding colon resection. In acute necrotizing pancreatitis combined with colonic mechanical obstruction, it is essential to clarify the etiology, and focus treatment on clearing the peripancreatic necrotic tissue, non-surgical treatment to deal with colonic obstruction is feasible, and the principle of individualized treatment should be used throughout the disease.

The use of self-expanding metallic stents in the management of benign colonic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients presenting with large bowel obstruction (LBO) frequently undergo emergency surgery that is associated with significant morbidity. In malignant LBO, endoscopic approaches with placement is a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS), have been proposed to prevent emergency surgery and act as a bridge to an elective procedure-with the intention of avoiding a stoma and reducing morbidity. This systematic review aims to assess the quality and outcomes of data available on the use of SEMS in benign causes of colonic obstruction. METHODS: This systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the protocol was registered on Prospero (ID: CRD42021239363). PUBMED, MEDLINE, HMIC, CINAHL, AMED, EMBASE, APA and Cochrane databases were searched. Studies were assessed for quality utilising the MINORS criteria. Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using random effects models. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included for analysis. 300 patients were included with an average age of 68, and a male predominance of 57%. The quality of the papers included were at risk of bias. The pooled rate of technical success of procedure was 94.4% (95% CI 90.5-96.8%) The pooled rate of clinical success was 77.6% (95% CI: 66.6-85.7%). Adverse effects were low, with perforation 8.8% (4.5-16.6%), recurrence 26.5% (17.2-38.5%) and stent migration 22.5% (14.1-33.8%). DISCUSSION: This systematic review demonstrated that SEMS for benign colonic obstruction can be a safe and successful procedure. The utilisation of SEMS in malignant disease as a bridge to surgery has been well documented. Whilst the limitations of the data interpreted are appreciated, we postulate that SEMS could be utilised to decompress patients acutely and allow pre-operative optimisation, leading to a more elective surgery with less subsequent morbidity.

Incarceration of Bochdalek hernia in an adult - case report.

This paper presents the case of a 32-year-old female patient with acute colon incarceration in the thoracic cavity due to Bochdalek hernia. An asymptomatic right Bochdalek hernia was also discovered, which is a rare finding. The patient underwent laparotomy with reposition of the incarcerated organs and primary closure of the left-sided defect. The stenotic portion of the originally incarcerated colon was resected one year later due to the symptoms of chronic bowel problems. At present, 18 months from the first surgery, the patient's clinical condition remains good with a positive clinical response to the secondary surgery involving resection of the stenotic colon, and the right Bochdalek hernia remains asymptomatic.

[Strangulated hernia of the foramen of Winslow complicated by acute colonic obstruction]. / Ushchemlennaya gryzha Vinslova otverstiya, oslozhnennaya ostroi tolstokishechnoi neprokhodimost'yu.

Internal hernias, in particular, hernia of the foramen of Winslow, are rare and occur in typical sites. Laparotomy is common in these cases while laparoscopic surgery is rarely used in such urgent cases. However, modern diagnosis and treatment including computed tomography and laparoscopy allowing minimally invasive interventions are not an exception for patients with hernia of the foramen of Winslow. This approach is effective for this problem and prevents adverse outcomes of disease.

Functional outcomes of bowel resection versus shaving or disc excision of colorectal endometriosis: a systematic review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis is a prevalent gynaecological condition for women of reproductive age worldwide. While endometriosis primarily involves the reproductive system, it can also infiltrate additional viscera such as the gastrointestinal tract. Patients with colorectal endometriosis can have severe symptoms that require surgical intervention. There are limited data available to guide the choice of resection technique based on the functional outcomes of bowel resection versus shaving or disc excision in treating colorectal endometriosis. This protocol aims to outline the methods that will be used in a systematic review of the literature comparing the functional outcomes of bowel resection to shaving and disc excision when surgically treating colorectal endometriosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Papers will be identified through database searches, scanning reference lists of relevant studies and citation searching of key papers. Two independent reviewers will screen studies against eligibility criteria and extract data using standardised forms. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane will be searched from the beginning of each database until February 2024. The primary outcome is comparing the functional bowel outcomes between the different methods of surgical treatment. Secondary outcome will be quality of life, based on the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score and the incidence of postoperative pain. A meta-analysis will be performed if the data are homogenous. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not require ethics approval. The results of the systematic review described within this protocol will be disseminated through presentations at relevant conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The methods will be used to inform future reviews. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023461711.

Toward less invasive coloproctology: The future is out there.

Medical care has undergone remarkable improvements over the past few decades. One of the most important innovative breakthroughs in modern medicine is the advent of minimally and less invasive treatments. The trend towards employing less invasive treatment has been vividly shown in the field of gastroenterology, particularly coloproctology. Parallel to foregut interventions, colorectal surgery has shifted towards a minimally invasive approach. Coloproctology, including both medical and surgical management of colorectal diseases, has undergone a remarkable paradigm shift. The treatment of both benign and malignant colorectal conditions has gradually transitioned towards more conservative and less invasive approaches. An interesting paradigm shift was the trend to avoid the need for radical resection of rectal cancer altogether in patients who showed complete response to neoadjuvant treatment. The trend of adopting less invasive approaches to treat various colorectal conditions does not seem to be stopping soon as further research on novel, more effective and safer methods is ongoing.

Unusual left colon displacement and clockwise torsion in a 10-month-old Arab filly: A case report.

In this case report, we present an unusual clockwise torsion of left colon around mesenteric root in a 10-month-old Arab filly, highlighting the clinical presentation, diagnostic approach and successful surgical intervention. A 10-month-old Arab filly weighing approximately 250 kg was referred with signs of acute abdominal pain. The history revealed anorexia, restlessness and severe abdominal pain that had begun the previous day. The local practitioner had previously administered flunixin meglumine, an analgesic, but it proved ineffective in relieving the pain. Upon physical examination, the filly exhibited sweating, a body temperature of 38.5°C, tachycardia (65 beats per minute) and tachypnea (25 breaths per minute). Due to the severity of the colic and the lack of response to the conservative treatments, surgical intervention was deemed necessary. An exploratory midline celiotomy was performed to evaluate the abdominal organs. During the examination, no obvious primary lesions were identified in the evaluated organs. However, a restriction in exteriorizing the left colon's length was observed. Further examination revealed an unusual clockwise torsion of the left colon that displaced in left to the right side around the mesenteric root; thereby, pelvic flexure was located in the normal anatomical position with a short length. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of clockwise torsion and an atypical displacement of the left colon in horses. The surgical correction of the displacement was successfully performed. The filly showed improvement post-surgery and did not exhibit any complications during the recovery period.

Experience with Laparoscopic and Robotic Colon Surgery Together with Other Major Minimally Invasive Procedures for Unrelated Pathologies.

Background: Indications for combined colon surgery together with other procedures include oncologic multivisceral resections and abdominal trauma. It is unclear if combining minimally invasive (MI) colon surgery with unrelated other procedures increases the risk for complications. Patients and Methods: The surgical database from two institutions during a 10-year period was queried for combined colon surgeries together with other interventions. All open cases, combined cases performed for one pathology and MI colectomies together with a minor procedure, were excluded. Results: Median age of the 6 men and 7 women was 64.4 (range 42.7-75.4) years. Colon surgeries included right (5), sigmoid (4) transverse (1) colectomies, rectum resection (1), rectopexy (1), and colostomy reversal (1) with indications of colorectal cancer (5), diverticulitis (3), benign ileocecal mass (1), colonic volvulus (3) and rectal prolapse (1). Second procedures included two splenectomies (sarcoidosis, ITP), paraesophageal hernia repairs (4), right diaphragmatic repairs [eventration (2) and Morgagni type hernia]; cholecystectomies (2), appendectomy (acute appendicitis), duodenal wedge resection (carcinoid), reversal of a gastric bypass (Roux limb stricture) one each. Cases were done laparoscopically (7) and robotic assisted (6). In most cases only 4 trocars were used. Median OR time was 4.3 (range 2.5 to 6.6) hours. No anastomotic breakdown was observed. Conclusions: Combining MI colectomy and other major abdominal surgeries can be safely done and in this series did not increase morbidity or mortality but avoids a second operation. Patient selection seems important and port placement may need to be altered to achieve good exposure for both procedures.

Colosplenic fistula diagnosis and management: a case series and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: A colosplenic fistula (CsF) is an extremely rare complication. Its diagnosis and management remain poorly understood, owing to its infrequent incidence. Our objective was to systematically review the etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, management, and prognosis to help clinicians gain a better understanding of this unusual complication and provide aid if it is to be encountered. METHODS: A systematic review of studies reporting CsF diagnosis in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Wiley Cochrane Library from 1946 to June 2022. Additionally, a retrospective review of four cases at our institution were included. Cases were evaluated for patient characteristics (age, sex, and comorbidities), CsF characteristics including causes, symptoms at presentation, diagnosis approach, management approach, pathology findings, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, and prognosis were collected. RESULTS: Thirty patients with CsFs were analyzed, including four cases at our institution and 26 single-case reports. Most of the patients were male (70%), with a median age of 56 years. The most common etiologies were colonic lymphoma (30%) and colorectal carcinoma (17%). Computed tomography (CT) was commonly used for diagnosis (90%). Approximately 87% of patients underwent a surgical intervention, most commonly segmental resection (81%) of the affected colon and splenectomy (77%). Nineteen patients were initially managed surgically, and 12 patients were initially managed nonoperatively. However, 11 of the nonoperative patients ultimately required surgery due to unresolved symptoms. The rate of postoperative complications was (17%). Symptoms resolved with surgical intervention in 25 (83%) patients. Only one patient (3%) had had postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our review of 30 cases worldwide is the largest in literature. CsFs are predominantly complications of neoplastic processes. CsF may be successfully and safely treated with splenectomy and resection of the affected colon, with a low rate of postoperative complications.

Management of a Complex Fistula Involving Abdominal Wall, Small Bowel, Colon, and Bladder.

Successful surgical management of a chronic complex abdominal fistula requires thoughtful pre-operative evaluation and planning and often benefits from a multi-disciplinary approach. Initially, attention is focused on controlling sepsis and ensuring adequate hydration and electrolyte replacement. Next, efforts to optimize nutrition and engage the patient in prehabilitation are prioritized. Simultaneously, imaging is used to gain detailed assessment of anatomy. We present a challenging case involving a Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain from prior surgery causing a complex intra-abdominal fistula. The JP drain traversed multiple small bowel loops and the sigmoid colon before terminating in the bladder. Management required multi-disciplinary coordination involving colorectal surgery and urology. The patient's definitive surgery included anterior resection, colostomy takedown, right colectomy, three small bowel resections, and bladder repair. The use of JP drains after abdominal surgery is not without risk. Clinicians should have standardized indications for placement of JP drains and consistent protocols regarding timing of removal.

Chronic jejuno-colonic fistula and intestinal malabsorption due to multiple magnet ingestions: A case report and systematic review.

Magnet ingestion in children can lead to serious complications, both acutely and chronically. This case report discusses the treatment approach for a case involving multiple magnet ingestions, which resulted in a jejuno-colonic fistula, segmental intestinal volvulus, hepa-tosteatosis, and renal calculus detected at a late stage. Additionally, we conducted a literature review to explore the characteristics of intestinal fistulas caused by magnet ingestion. A six-year-old girl was admitted to the Pediatric Gastroenterology Department pre-senting with intermittent abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea persisting for two years. Initial differential diagnoses included celiac disease, cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and tuberculosis, yet the etiology remained elusive. The Pediatric Surgery team was consulted after a jejuno-colonic fistula was suspected based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. The physical examination revealed no signs of acute abdomen but showed mild abdominal distension. Subsequent upper gastrointestinal series and contrast enema graphy confirmed a jejuno-colonic fistula and segmental volvulus. The family later reported that the child had swallowed a magnet two years prior, and medical follow-up had stopped after the spontaneous expulsion of the magnets within one to two weeks. Surgical intervention was necessary to correct the volvulus and repair the large jejuno-colonic fistula. To identify relevant studies, we conducted a detailed literature search on magnet ingestion and gastrointestinal fistulas according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We identified 44 articles encompassing 55 cases where symptoms did not manifest in the acute phase and acute abdomen was not observed. In 29 cases, the time of magnet ingestion was unknown. Among the 26 cases with a known ingestion time, the average duration until fistula detection was 22.8 days (range: 1-90 days). Fistula repairs were performed via laparotomy in 47 cases.

Colonic intussusception after endoscopic mucosal resection successfully managed by endoscopic procedure.

Adult-onset intussusception, particularly associated with colonoscopy, is extremely rare. A 78-year-old man, referred to our hospital for colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), experienced subsequent dull abdominal pain, as well as elevated peripheral blood leukocytosis and C-reactive protein levels. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a colocolonic intussusception at the hepatic flexure. Emergency colonoscopy revealed ball-like swollen mucosa distal to the EMR site of the ascending colon. The mucosa was intact without necrosis. The endoscopic approach was able to temporarily release the intussusception. A transanal drainage tube was inserted through the endoscope to prevent relapse. Both CT and colonoscopy showed release of the intussusception. Our case underscores the importance of considering colocolonic intussusception in post-colonoscopy abdominal pain, advocating for endoscopic management after excluding mucosal necrosis.

Pain and opioid use after colorectal resection for benign versus malignant disease: A single institution analysis.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing opioid needs between benign and malignant colorectal diseases are inconclusive. METHODS: Single institution analysis of prospectively maintained colorectal surgery database. Multiple regression analyses done on perioperative numeric pain scores (NPS) and opioids prescribed at discharge. RESULTS: 641 patients in Benign and 276 patients in the Malignant group. Unadjusted comparison revealed significantly higher NPS for the Benign than the Malignant group preoperative and postoperative day 0 (after surgery), 1, 2, and 3 (all p â€‹≤ â€‹0.001). Opioids prescribed at discharge were significantly higher in the Benign group (60.0% vs 51.1%, p â€‹= â€‹0.018). After regression analysis, there was no longer a significant difference in NPS (B â€‹= â€‹0.703, p â€‹= â€‹0.095) and opioids prescribed between groups [OR â€‹= â€‹0.803 (95%CI 0.586, 1.1), p â€‹= â€‹0.173]. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and opioids prescribed at discharge are not significantly different between benign and malignant diseases in an enhanced recovery pain management pathway that maximizes non-opioid multimodal analgesic strategies.

Surgical repair of endoscopy-induced colonic perforations: a case-matched study of short-term morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to describe the clinical outcomes of surgical interventions performed for the management of colonoscopy-related perforations and to compare these outcomes with those of matched colorectal surgeries performed in elective and emergency settings. METHODS: We included patients with endoscopic colonic perforation who underwent surgical intervention from the 2014-2017 National Surgery Quality Improvement Program participant use data colorectal targeted procedure file. The primary outcome in this study was short term surgical morbidity and mortality. Patients (group 1) were matched with 1:2 ratio to control patients undergoing same surgical interventions for other indications on an elective (group 2) or emergency basis (group 3). Bivariate analysis was conducted to compare categorical variables between the three groups, and multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between the surgical indication and 30-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 590 patients were included. The average age of the patients was 66.5±13.6 with female gender predominance (381, 64.6%) The majority of patients underwent open colectomy (365, 61.9%) while the rest had suturing (140, 23.7%) and laparoscopic colectomy (85, 14.4%). Overall mortality occurred in 4.1% and no statistically significant difference in mortality was found between the three techniques (P=0.468). Composite morbidity occurred in 163 patients (27.6%). It was significantly lower in laparoscopic colectomy (14.1%) compared to 30.2% and 29.4% in open colectomy and suturing approaches (P=0.014). Patients undergoing colectomy for iatrogenic colonic perforation had less mortality, infection rates and sepsis, as well as bleeding episodes compared to those who had colectomy on an emergent basis. Outcomes were comparable between the former group and patients undergoing elective colectomy for other indications. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of colonoscopy related perforations is safe and effective with outcomes that are similar to that of patients undergoing elective colectomy.