On Being an Epidemiologist.

This commentary addresses being an epidemiologist at a time when the field of epidemiology again faces a paradigm shift as the tools for research on human health draw increasingly on emerging technologies-various omics and new methods for collecting individual data at high intensity-and on new methods for carrying out research through administrative and health care data bases linked to biobanks. At the same time, epidemiologists in public health practice continue to face the usual array of challenges, but with the threat of global issues as well. The profession of epidemiologist is not monolithic; it embraces a broad range of activities and professional venues, reflecting the many contexts where epidemiologists do their work, the nature of the problems addressed, and the span and application of their findings. Obtaining data from people and populations comes with serious ethical obligations related to privacy and confidentiality of individuals and respect for the populations studied. Beyond generating and analyzing data, epidemiologists engage in guiding action through the evidence they have created with the ultimate goal of advancing health. This commentary addresses "mega-trends" that will affect the profession in the decades to come.

CDC's "Flexible" Epidemiologist: A Strategy for Enhancing Health Department Infectious Disease Epidemiology Capacity.

CONTEXT: CDC's Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Cooperative Agreement aims to help health departments strengthen core epidemiology capacity needed to respond to a variety of emerging infectious diseases. In fiscal year 2014, $6 million was awarded to 41 health departments for flexible epidemiologists (FEs). FEs were intended to help meet health departments' unique needs and support unanticipated events that could require the diversion of resources to specific emerging or reemerging diseases. OBJECTIVE: Explore multiple perspectives to characterize how FEs are utilized and to understand the perceived value of this strategy from the health department perspective. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted 14 in-depth interviews using a semistructured questionnaire with a heterogeneous sample of 8 state health departments; 2 different instruments were administered to ELC principal investigators (PIs) or supervisors, and FEs. The team produced a codebook consisting of both structural and data-driven codes to prepare for a thematic analysis of the data. RESULTS: Three major patterns emerged to describe how FEs are being used in health departments; most commonly, FEs were used to support priorities and gaps across a range of infectious diseases, with an emphasis on enteric diseases. Almost all of the health departments utilized FEs to assist in investigating and responding to outbreaks, maintaining and upgrading surveillance systems, and coordinating and collaborating with partners. Both PIs and supervisors highly valued the flexibility it offered to their programs because FEs were cross-trained and could be used to help with situations where additional staff members were needed. CONCLUSION: ELC enhances epidemiology capacity in health departments by providing flexible personnel that help sustain areas with losses in capacity, addressing programmatic gaps, and supporting unanticipated events. Our findings support the notion that flexible personnel could be an effective model for strengthening epidemiology capacity among health departments. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY & PRACTICE: Our findings have practical implications for addressing the overall decline in the public health workforce, as well as the current context and environment of public health funding at both state and federal levels.

How Do Infectious Disease Epidemiologist Positions Increase Public Health Capacity? Results from a Qualitative Study of Local Health Departments.

The purpose of this study was to characterize changes in and impacts on epidemiologic capacity in local health departments after the implementation of a state-funded epidemiologist program using qualitative data. The study used key informant interviews in Texas health departments, which were conducted and inductively analyzed to identify themes. Five predominant themes emerged from interviews on the impact of state-funded epidemiologists on the epidemiology capacity of local health departments. State-funded epidemiologists were seen as increasing overall epidemiology capacity in local health departments. Specifically, they improved timeliness of infectious disease reporting and quality and thoroughness of disease investigations. They also improved community stakeholder relationships with local health departments and communications across local, regional, and state public health agencies. Key informants at all levels described positive effects of the state-funded epidemiologists on disease surveillance. Local epidemiology capacity has increased, and, in turn, Texas public health surveillance capacity has improved at the local, regional, and state levels. Funding programs like this should be considered when public health capacity is low and in need of an increase.