On Being an Epidemiologist.

This commentary addresses being an epidemiologist at a time when the field of epidemiology again faces a paradigm shift as the tools for research on human health draw increasingly on emerging technologies-various omics and new methods for collecting individual data at high intensity-and on new methods for carrying out research through administrative and health care data bases linked to biobanks. At the same time, epidemiologists in public health practice continue to face the usual array of challenges, but with the threat of global issues as well. The profession of epidemiologist is not monolithic; it embraces a broad range of activities and professional venues, reflecting the many contexts where epidemiologists do their work, the nature of the problems addressed, and the span and application of their findings. Obtaining data from people and populations comes with serious ethical obligations related to privacy and confidentiality of individuals and respect for the populations studied. Beyond generating and analyzing data, epidemiologists engage in guiding action through the evidence they have created with the ultimate goal of advancing health. This commentary addresses "mega-trends" that will affect the profession in the decades to come.

Metabolomics in epidemiologic research: challenges and opportunities for early-career epidemiologists.

BACKGROUND: The application of metabolomics to epidemiologic studies is increasing. AIM OF REVIEW: Here, we describe the challenges and opportunities facing early-career epidemiologists aiming to apply metabolomics to their research. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: Many challenges inherent to metabolomics may provide early-career epidemiologists with the opportunity to play a pivotal role in answering critical methodological questions and moving the field forward. Although generating large-scale high-quality metabolomics data can be challenging, data can be accessed through public databases, collaboration with senior researchers or participation within interest groups. Such efforts may also assist with obtaining funding, provide knowledge on training resources, and help early-career epidemiologists to publish in the field of metabolomics.

Barriers and Facilitators to Scientific Writing Among Applied Epidemiologists.

CONTEXT: Communication in the form of written and oral reports and presentations is a core competency for epidemiologists at governmental public health agencies. Many applied epidemiologists do not publish peer-reviewed articles, limiting the scientific literature of best practices in evidence-based public health. OBJECTIVES: To describe the writing and publishing experiences of applied epidemiologists and identify barriers and facilitators to publishing. DESIGN: Telephone focus groups and an 18-question multiple-choice and short-answer Web-based assessment were fielded in 2014. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Six focus groups composed of 26 applied epidemiologists and an online assessment answered by 396 applied epidemiologists. Sample selection was stratified by years of experience. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Past publishing experience, current job duties as related to publishing, barriers and facilitators to writing and publishing, and desired training in writing and publishing were assessed through focus groups and the online assessment. RESULTS: Focus groups identified 4 themes: job expectations, barriers to publishing, organizational culture, and the understanding of public health practice among reviewers as issues related to writing and publishing. Most respondents (80%) expressed a desire to publish; however, only 59% had published in a peer-reviewed journal. An academic appointment (among doctoral educated respondents) was identified as a facilitator to publishing as was access to peer-reviewed literature. Time (68%) was identified as the greatest barrier to writing and publishing. Other major barriers included lack of encouragement or support (33%) within the public health agency and agency clearance processes (32%). Assistance with journal selection (62%), technical writing skills (60%), and manuscript formatting (57%) were listed as the most needed trainings. CONCLUSION: Public health agencies can be facilitators for epidemiologists to contribute to the scientific literature through increasing access to the peer-reviewed literature, creating a supportive environment for writing and publishing, and investing in desired and needed training. The results have implications for modifying workplace policies surrounding writing and publishing.