Navigated Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Evaluating the Combined Use of a Frame-Based Stereotactic System and a Navigation System.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a complex surgical procedure that requires detailed anatomical knowledge. In many fields of neurosurgery navigation systems are used to display anatomical structures during an operation to aid performing these surgeries. In frame-based DBS, the advantage of visualization has not yet been evaluated during the procedure itself. In this study, we added live visualization to a frame-based DBS system, using a standard navigation system and investigated its accuracy and potential use in DBS surgery. As a first step, a phantom study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of the navigation system in conjunction with a frame-based approach. As a second step, 5 DBS surgeries were performed with this combined approach. Afterwards, 3 neurosurgeons and 2 neurologists with different levels of experience evaluated the potential use of the system with a questionnaire. Moreover, the additional personnel, costs and required set up time were noted and compared to 5 consecutive standard procedures. In the phantom study, the navigation system showed an inaccuracy of 2.1 mm (mean SD 0.69 mm). In the questionnaire, a mean of 9.4/10 points was awarded for the use of the combined approach as a teaching tool, a mean of 8.4/10 for its advantage in creating a 3-dimensional (3-D) map and a mean of 8/10 points for facilitating group discussions. Especially neurosurgeons and neurologists in training found it useful to better interpret clinical results and side effects (mean 9/10 points) and neurosurgeons appreciated its use to better interpret microelectrode recordings (mean 9/10 points). A mean of 6/10 points was awarded when asked if the benefits were worth the additional efforts. Initially 2 persons, then one additional person was required to set up the system with no relevant added time or costs. Using a navigation system for live visualization during frame-based DBS surgery can improve the understanding of the complex 3-D anatomy and many aspects of the procedure itself. For now, we would regard it as an excellent teaching tool rather than a necessity to perform DBS surgeries.

Levodopa Challenge Test Predicts STN-DBS Outcomes in Various Parkinson's Disease Motor Subtypes: A More Accurate Judgment.

Background: The relationship between the levodopa challenge test (LDCT) and postoperative subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) benefits is controversial in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We aim to evaluate the value of total levodopa response (TLR) and symptom levodopa response (SLR) in predicting postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes. Methods: Studies were split into a training set (147 patients) and a validation set (304 patients). We retrospectively collected data from 147 patients who received the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale- (UPDRS-) III and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire- (PDQ-) 39 evaluation. Patients were classified into tremor-dominant (TD), akinetic-rigid-dominant (AR), and mixed (MX) groups. Clinically important difference (CID) was employed to dichotomize DBS effects. For patients in each subtype group from the training set, we used the correlation and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to explore the strength of their relations. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated and compared through the DeLong test. Results developed from the training set were applied into the validation set to predict postoperative improvement in different PD motor subtypes. Results: In the validation cohort, TLR significantly correlated with postoperative motor (p < 0.001) and quality of life (QOL) (p < 0.001) improvement in the MX group. The AUC between TLR and UPDRS-III (TU) is 0.800. The AUC between TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) is 0.770. An associated criterion in both TU and TP is around 50%. In the AR group, strong correlation was only found in SLR and PDQ-39 (SP) (p < 0.001). And the AUC of SP is significantly larger than that in TLR and PDQ-39 (TP) (p = 0.034). An associated criterion in SP is around 37%. No significant correlation was found in the TD group. Conclusions: We provide a more accurate judgment for LDCT. TLR strongly correlated with postoperative UPDRS-III and PDQ-39 improvement in MX patients. A TLR > 50% may indicate a higher possibility of clinically meaningful benefits from STN-DBS comparing to medication only. SLR can well predict QOL improvement in AR patients. Similarly, a SLR > 37% may indicate a higher possibility of clinically significant benefits from STN-DBS. LDCT provides limited information for TD patients.

Brain connectivity markers for the identification of effective contacts in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

The clinical benefit of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) is relevant to the tracts adjacent to the stimulation site, but it remains unclear what connectivity pattern is associated with effective DBS. The aim of this study was to identify clinically effective electrode contacts on the basis of brain connectivity markers derived from diffusion tensor tractography. We reviewed 77 PD patients who underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS surgery. The patients were assigned into the training (n = 58) and validation (n = 19) groups. According to the therapeutic window size, all contacts were classified into effective and ineffective groups. The whole-brain connectivity of each contact's volume of tissue activated was estimated using tractography with preoperative diffusion tensor data. Extracted connectivity features were put into an all-relevant feature selection procedure within cross-validation loops, to identify features with significant discriminative power for contact classification. A total of 616 contacts on 154 DBS leads were discriminated, with 388 and 228 contacts being classified as effective and ineffective ones, respectively. After the feature selection, the connectivity of contacts with the thalamus, pallidum, hippocampus, primary motor area, supplementary motor area and superior frontal gyrus was identified to significantly contribute to contact classification. Based on these relevant features, the random forest model constructed from the training group achieved an accuracy of 84.9% in the validation group, to discriminate effective contacts from the ineffective. Our findings advanced the understanding of the specific brain connectivity patterns associated with clinical effective electrode contacts, which potentially guided postoperative DBS programming.

Deep brain stimulation for cerebral palsy: where are we now?

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a complex disorder and children frequently have multiple impairments. Dystonia is a particularly frustrating impairment that interferes with rehabilitation and function and is difficult to treat. Of the available treatments, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as an option with the potential for large effect size in a subgroup of children. While brain stimulation has been used in CP for more than 40 years, modern devices and targeting methods are improving both the safety and efficacy of the procedure. Successful use of DBS depends on appropriate selection of patients, identification of effective neuroanatomical targets in each patient, careful neurosurgical procedure, and detailed follow-up evaluation and programming. The use of functional neurosurgery for neuromodulation in CP remains a technology in its infancy, but improving experience and knowledge are likely to make this one of the safest and most effective interventions for children with moderate-to-severe motor disorders. This review summarizes the current procedures for patient and target selection, and surgical implantation of DBS electrodes for CP. The history of DBS and future directions when used in secondary dystonia are also examined. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Selection of candidates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires understanding of dystonia in cerebral palsy . DBS could become a first-line treatment option in some children.

ESTIMULACIÓN CEREBRAL PROFUNDA PARA LA PARÁLISIS CEREBRAL: ¿DÓNDE ESTAMOS AHORA?: La parálisis cerebral (PC) es un trastorno complejo y los niños con frecuencia tienen discapacidades múltiples. La distonía es un deterioro particularmente frustrante que interfiere con la rehabilitación y la función y es difícil de tratar. De los tratamientos disponibles, la estimulación cerebral profunda (DBS, por sus siglas en inglés - deep brain stimulation) ha surgido como una opción con el potencial de un gran tamaño de efecto en un subgrupo de niños. Si bien la estimulación cerebral se ha utilizado en PC durante más de 40 años, los dispositivos modernos y los métodos de detección están mejorando tanto la seguridad como la eficacia del procedimiento. El uso exitoso de la DBS depende de la selección apropiada de los pacientes, la identificación de objetivos neuroanatómicos efectivos en cada paciente, el procedimiento neuroquirúrgico cuidadoso y la evaluación y programación de seguimiento detalladas. El uso de la neurocirugía funcional para la neuromodulación en la PC sigue siendo una tecnología en su infancia, pero es probable que la mejora de la experiencia y los conocimientos hagan de esta una de las intervenciones más seguras y efectivas para los niños con trastornos motores de moderados a graves. Esta revisión resume los procedimientos actuales para la selección de pacientes y objetivos, y la implantación quirúrgica de electrodos DBS para PC. La historia de DBS y las direcciones futuras cuando se utilizan en la distonía secundaria también se examinan.

ESTIMULAÇÃO CEREBRAL PROFUNDA PARA PARALISIA CEREBRAL: ONDE ESTAMOS AGORA?: Paralisia cerebral (PC) é uma desordem complexa e crianças frequentemente apresentam múltiplas deficiências. A distonia é uma deficiência particularmente frustrante que interfere com a reabilitação e função, e é difícil de tratar. Dentre dos tratamentos disponíveis, a estimulação cerebral profunda (ECP) emergiu como uma opção com potencial de grande tamanho de efeito em um subgrupo de crianças. Embora a estimulação cerebral seja usada em PC há mais de 40 anos, dispositivos modernos e métodos de identificação de áreas alvo tem melhorado tanto a segurança quanto a eficácia do procedimento. O uso bem sucedido da ECP depende da seleção apropriada dos pacientes, identificação dos alvos neuroanatômicos efetivos para cada paciente, procedimento neurocirúrgico cuidadoso, e avaliação e programação detalhadas no acompanhamento. O uso de neurocirurgia funcional para neuromodulação em PC ainda é uma tecnologia iniciante, mas a crescente experiência e conhecimento provavelmente farão dela uma das mais seguras e efetivas intervenções para crianças com transtornos motores de moderados a severos. Esta revisão sintetiza os procedimentos atuais para seleção de pacientes e alvos, e a implantação cirúrgica de eletrodos de ECP para PC. A história da ECP e direções futuras, quando usados em distonia secundária, também são examinados.

Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Implantation Using a Customized Rapidly Manufactured Stereotactic Fixture with Submillimetric Euclidean Accuracy.

BACKGROUND: The microTargetingTM MicrotableTM Platform is a novel stereotactic system that can be more rapidly fabricated than currently available 3D-printed alternatives. We present the first case series of patients who underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery guided by this platform and demonstrate its in vivo accuracy. METHODS: Ten patients underwent DBS at a single institution by the senior author and 15 leads were placed. The mean age was 69.1 years; four were female. The ventralis intermedius nucleus was targeted for patients with essential tremor and the subthalamic nucleus was targeted for patients with Parkinson's disease. RESULTS: Nine DBS leads in 6 patients were appropriately imaged to enable measurement of accuracy. The mean Euclidean electrode placement error (EPE) was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm, and the mean radial error was 0.80 ± 0.41 mm (n = 9). In the subset of CT scans performed greater than 1 month postoperatively (n = 3), the mean Euclidean EPE was 0.75 ± 0.17 mm and the mean radial error was 0.69 ± 0.17 mm. There were no surgical complications. CONCLUSION: The MicrotableTM platform is capable of submillimetric accuracy in patients undergoing stereotactic surgery. It has achieved clinical efficacy in our patients without surgical complications and has demonstrated the potential for superior accuracy compared to both traditional stereotactic frames and other common frameless systems.

Deep brain stimulation telemedicine programming during the COVID-19 pandemic: treatment of patients with psychiatric disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has considerably affected the delivery of postoperative care to patients who have undergone deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. DBS teleprogramming technology was developed and deployed in China before the COVID-19 outbreak. In this report, the authors share their experiences with telemedical DBS treatment of patients with psychiatric disorders during the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: Four patients (2 with obsessive-compulsive disorder, 1 with major depressive disorder, and 1 with anorexia nervosa) underwent DBS surgery at Ruijin Hospital and received continuous postoperative DBS telemedicine case management from January 2020 to July 2020. DBS teleprogramming, individualized psychological support, and medical consultations were provided via the authors' DBS telemedicine platform, which also incorporated a synchronous real-time video communication system. RESULTS: Forty-five DBS telemedicine sessions were conducted; there was no unexpected loss of network connection during the sessions. Of these, 28 sessions involved DBS teleprogramming. Adjustments were made to the stimulation voltage, frequency, pulse width, and contact site in 21, 12, 9, and 9 sessions, respectively. Psychological support and troubleshooting were provided during the remaining telemedicine sessions. Modest to substantial clinical improvements after DBS surgery were observed in some but not all patients, whereas stimulation-related side effects were reported by 2 patients and included reversible sleep and mood problems, headache, and a sensation of heat. CONCLUSIONS: DBS telemedicine seems to offer a feasible, safe, and efficient strategy for maintaining the delivery of medical care to psychiatric patients during the COVID-19 outbreak. The authors propose that implementation of a comprehensive DBS telemedicine system, which combines DBS teleprogramming with psychological counseling, medical consultations, and medication prescriptions and delivery, could be an efficient and effective approach to manage the mental health and quality of life of patients with psychiatric disorders during future local or global public health crises.

Quantitatively validating the efficacy of artifact suppression techniques to study the cortical consequences of deep brain stimulation with magnetoencephalography.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established and effective treatment for several movement disorders and is being developed to treat a host of neuropsychiatric disorders including epilepsy, chronic pain, obsessive compulsive disorder, and depression. However, the neural mechanisms through which DBS produces therapeutic benefits, and in some cases unwanted side effects, in these disorders are only partially understood. Non-invasive neuroimaging techniques that can assess the neural effects of active stimulation are important for advancing our understanding of the neural basis of DBS therapy. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a safe, passive imaging modality with relatively high spatiotemporal resolution, which makes it a potentially powerful method for examining the cortical network effects of DBS. However, the degree to which magnetic artifacts produced by stimulation and the associated hardware can be suppressed from MEG data, and the comparability between signals measured during DBS-on and DBS-off conditions, have not been fully quantified. The present study used machine learning methods in conjunction with a visual perception task, which should be relatively unaffected by DBS, to quantify how well neural data can be salvaged from artifact contamination introduced by DBS and how comparable DBS-on and DBS-off data are after artifact removal. Machine learning also allowed us to determine whether the spatiotemporal pattern of neural activity recorded during stimulation are comparable to those recorded when stimulation is off. The spatiotemporal patterns of visually evoked neural fields could be accurately classified in all 8 patients with DBS implants during both DBS-on and DBS-off conditions and performed comparably across those two conditions. Further, the classification accuracy for classifiers trained on the spatiotemporal patterns evoked during DBS-on trials and applied to DBS-off trials, and vice versa, were similar to that of the classifiers trained and tested on either trial type, demonstrating the comparability of these patterns across conditions. Together, these results demonstrate the ability of MEG preprocessing techniques, like temporal signal space separation, to salvage neural data from recordings contaminated with DBS artifacts and validate MEG as a powerful tool to study the cortical consequences of DBS.

Reconfigurable MRI technology for low-SAR imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3T: Application in bilateral leads, fully-implanted systems, and surgically modified lead trajectories.

Patients with deep brain stimulation devices highly benefit from postoperative MRI exams, however MRI is not readily accessible to these patients due to safety risks associated with RF heating of the implants. Recently we introduced a patient-adjustable reconfigurable coil technology that substantially reduced local SAR at tips of single isolated DBS leads during MRI at 1.5 T in 9 realistic patient models. This contribution extends our work to higher fields by demonstrating the feasibility of scaling the technology to 3T and assessing its performance in patients with bilateral leads as well as fully implanted systems. We developed patient-derived models of bilateral DBS leads and fully implanted DBS systems from postoperative CT images of 13 patients and performed finite element simulations to calculate SAR amplification at electrode contacts during MRI with a reconfigurable rotating coil at 3T. Compared to a conventional quadrature body coil, the reconfigurable coil system reduced the SAR on average by 83% for unilateral leads and by 59% for bilateral leads. A simple surgical modification in trajectory of implanted leads was demonstrated to increase the SAR reduction efficiency of the rotating coil to >90% in a patient with a fully implanted bilateral DBS system. Thermal analysis of temperature-rise around electrode contacts during typical brain exams showed a 15-fold heating reduction using the rotating coil, generating <1°C temperature rise during ∼4-min imaging with high-SAR sequences where a conventional CP coil generated >10°C temperature rise in the tissue for the same flip angle.

Effect of Anesthesia on Microelectrode Recordings during Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery in Tourette Syndrome Patients.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an accepted treatment for patients with medication-resistant Tourette syndrome (TS). Sedation is commonly required during electrode implantation to attenuate anxiety, pain, and severe tics. Anesthetic agents potentially impair the quality of microelectrode recordings (MER). Little is known about the effect of these anesthetics on MER in patients with TS. We describe our experience with different sedative regimens on MER and tic severity in patients with TS. METHODS: The clinical records of all TS patients who underwent DBS surgery between 2010 and 2018 were reviewed. Demographic data, stimulation targets, anesthetic agents, perioperative complications, and MER from each hemisphere were collected and analyzed. Single-unit activity was identified by filtering spiking activity from broadband MER data and principal component analysis with K-means clustering. Vocal and motor tics which caused artifacts in the MER data were manually selected using visual and auditory inspection. RESULTS: Six patients underwent bilateral DBS electrode implantation. In all patients, the target was the anterior internal globus pallidus. Patient comfort and hemodynamic and respiratory stability were maintained with conscious sedation with one or more of the following anesthetic drugs: propofol, midazolam, remifentanil, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine. Good quality MER and clinical testing were obtained in 9 hemispheres of 6 patients. In 3 patients, MER quality was poor on one side. CONCLUSION: Cautiously applied sedative drugs can provide patient comfort, hemodynamic and respiratory stability, and suppress severe tics, with minimal interference with MER.

Clinical Validation of Quality Improvements Using the Six Sigma Concept: A Case Study for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: The Six Sigma concept allows for the evaluation of quality changes after the implementation of new technical equipment or adjustment of perioperative procedures. Exemplarily, we applied this method for quality assessment in deep brain stimulation surgery (DBS) for Parkinson's disease. METHODS: The medical procedure and possible errors were registered. Then, 6 critical-to-quality characteristics regarding clinical outcome, surgical precision, and the surgical process were measured. The surgical procedure was then optimized in 2 steps, and its measurement, along with the analysis, was repeated twice. RESULTS: By optimizing perioperative settings, the operation time could be reduced, and the precision of the lead placement could be increased. Clinical outcome, as measured by improvement in UPDRS-III, IV, and reduction of medication could also be improved with smaller required stimulation voltage. With directional leads considerable reduction of medication was achieved in 97% of patients (σ-value 3.39) compared to 83.7% (σ-value 2.53) with nondirectional leads. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the Six Sigma concept is a suitable quality tool to analyze and improve treatment quality of complex medical procedures such as lead positioning in DBS surgery in clinical routine. Our results suggest that directional leads in subthalamic nucleus DBS may have a favorable impact on patients' outcome.

Accuracy in Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Placement: A Single-Surgeon Retrospective Analysis of Sterotactic Error in Overlapping and Non-Overlapping Surgical Cases.

BACKGROUND: Many surgeons utilize assistants to perform procedures in more than one operating room at a given time using a practice known as overlapping surgery. Debate has continued as to whether overlapping surgery improves the efficiency and access to care or risks patient safety and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine effects of overlapping surgery in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of overlapping and non-overlapping cases, we evaluated stereotactic accuracy, operative duration, length of hospital stay, and the presence of hemorrhage, wound-related complications, and hardware-related complications requiring revision in adults with movement disorders undergoing DBS. RESULTS: Of 324 cases, 141 (43.5%) were overlapping and 183 (56.5%) non-overlapping. Stereotactic error, number of brain penetrations, and postoperative length of hospitalization did not differ significantly (p ≥ 0.08) between the overlapping and non-overlapping groups. Mean operative duration was significantly longer for overlapping (81/141 [57.4%], 189.5 ± 10.8 min) than for non-overlapping cases (79/183 [43.2%], 169.9 ± 7.6 min; p = 0.004). There were no differences in rates of wound-related complications or hemorrhages, but overlapping cases had a significantly higher rate of hardware-related complications requiring revision (7/141 [5.0%] vs. 0/183 [0%]; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Overlapping and non-overlapping cases had comparable DBS lead placement accuracy. Overlapping cases had a longer operative duration and had a higher rate of hardware-related complications requiring revision.

A Comparative Study of Fiducial-Based and Fiducial-Less Registration Utilizing the O-Arm.

BACKGROUND: Frameless stereotactic surgery utilizing fiducial-based (FB) registration is an established tool in the armamentarium of deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgeons. Fiducial-less (FL) registration via intraoperative CT, such as the O-arm, has been routinely used in spine surgery, but its accuracy for DBS surgery has not been studied in a clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: We undertook a study to analyze the accuracy of the FL technique in DBS surgery and compare it to the FB method. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 97 patients underwent DBS surgery using the NexFrame and the O-arm registration stereotactic system. Patients underwent FB (n = 50) registration from 2015 to 2016 and FL (n = 47) O-arm registration from 2016 to 2017. RESULTS: The radial errors (RE) and vector/euclidean errors of FB and FL registration were not significantly different. There was no difference in additional passes between methods, but there was an increase in the number of RE ≥2.5 mm in the FL method. CONCLUSION: Although there was no statistically significant difference in RE or the need for additional passes, the increased number of errors ≥2.5 mm with the FL method (17 vs. 4% in FB) indicates the need for further study. We concluded that O-arm images of the implants should be utilized to assess and correct for this error.

Frameless Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Single-Center Experience and Retrospective Analysis of Placement Accuracy of 220 Electrodes in a Series of 110 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Proper lead placement is considered one of the key factors in achieving a good clinical outcome in deep brain stimulation (DBS), but there is still considerable controversy surrounding the accuracy of the frameless in comparison to the frame-based technique. OBJECTIVE: We report our single-center experience with DBS electrode placement to evaluate the accuracy of the frameless stereotactic system. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed the data of 110 patients who underwent DBS surgery for Parkinson disease, dystonia, essential tremor, or refractory epilepsy. The final targets (FTs) of the 220 leads were: subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus pars interna, ventralis intermedius nucleus, and anterior nuclei of thalamus in thalamus. A bilateral stereotactic approach using a combined identification of target based on preoperative images (MRI and CT scan fusion) and intra-operative micro-electrode recording (MER) were done. We collected and compared the coordinates of planned target (PT), the definitive expected target (ET) during MER, and the effective final location (FT) of the lead using the postoperative CT. Accuracy was assessed by both vector error (VE) and deviation from the PT. RESULTS: The mean and SD from PTs was 0.78 ± 0.43 mm in the x direction, 0.68 ± 0.41 mm in the y direction, and 0.76 ± 0.41 mm in the z direction. Global VE was 1.43 ± 0.37. CONCLUSION: Frameless systems appear to be a reliable and accurate technique.

A human rights approach to low data reporting in clinical trials of psychiatric deep brain stimulation.

The reporting of clinical trial data is necessary not only for doctors to determine treatment efficacy, but also to explore new questions without unnecessarily repeating trials, and to protect patients and the public from dangers when data are withheld. This issue is particularly salient in those trials involving invasive neurosurgical interventions, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), for 'treatment refractory' psychiatric disorders. Using the federal database ClinicalTrials.gov, it was discovered that out of the completed or unknown-status trials related to psychiatric DBS up to November 2018, only two had submitted results to ClinicalTrials.gov. These results suggest that, despite federal requirements to report clinical trial data, reporting on psychiatric DBS trials is problematically minimal. It is argued that a human rights approach to this problem establishes a legal and ethical foundation for the need to report clinical trial results in this area.

Therapeutic Window of Deep Brain Stimulation Using Cathodic Monopolar, Bipolar, Semi-Bipolar, and Anodic Stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic window (TW) of cathodic monopolar, bipolar, anodic monopolar, and a novel "semi-bipolar" stimulation in ten Parkinson's disease patients who underwent deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were assessed in the "OFF" L-dopa condition. Each upper limb was tested separately for therapeutic threshold, TW and side-effect threshold (SET). Battery consumption index (BCI) also was documented. RESULTS: Compared to cathodic stimulation, therapeutic threshold was significantly higher for anodic, bipolar, and semi-bipolar stimulation (3.8 ± 1.6 vs. 4.9 ± 2.1, 5.0 ± 1.9, and 5.2 ± 1.9 mA, p = 0.0006, 0.0002, and 0.008, respectively). SET was significantly higher for bipolar stimulation (10.9 ± 2.5 mA) vs. cathodic (6.8 ± 2.2 mA, p < 0.0001) and anodic stimulation (9.2 ± 2.6 mA, p = 0.005). The SET of anodic and semi-bipolar stimulation was significantly higher vs. cathodic stimulation (p < 0.0001). TW of cathodic stimulation (2.5 ± 1.5 mA) was significantly narrower vs. bipolar (5.4 ± 2.0 mA, p < 0.0001), semi-bipolar (4.6 ± 2.6 mA, p = 0.001) and anodic stimulation (4.3 ± 2.3 mA, p < 0.0001). Bipolar (p = 0.005) and semi-bipolar (p = 0.0005) stimulation had a significantly wider TW vs. anodic stimulation. BCI of cathodic stimulation (5.9 ± 1.3) was significantly lower compared to bipolar (13.7 ± 6.8, p < 0.0001), semi-bipolar (11.0 ± 4.3, p = 0.0005), and anodic stimulation (8.1 ± 3.0, p < 0.0001). Anodic BCI was significantly lower than bipolar (p = 0.005) and semi-bipolar (p = 0.0002) stimulation while semi-bipolar BCI was lower than bipolar stimulation (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: While awaiting further studies, our findings suggest that cathodic stimulation should be preferred in light of its reduced battery consumption, possibly followed by semi-bipolar in case of stimulation-induced side-effects.

The Accuracy and Feasibility of Robotic Assisted Lead Implantation in Nonhuman Primates.

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation are the most important and frequent manipulations in nonhuman primates (NHP) neuromodulation research. However, traditional methods tend to be arduous and inaccurate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve adult male rhesus monkeys were selected for the study, with six subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS, six anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) DBS and six hippocampus-SEEG (Hippo-SEEG) electrodes implantation. Mean Euclidean errors of entrance and the target were calculated by postoperative image fusion, and the correlation between entrance and target error, as well as the differences among the various manipulations, were analyzed. The accuracy of target was further confirmed by gross anatomy examination. Moreover, the time consumption was recorded. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) Euclidean errors of the target point and entry point of the three manipulations were STN-DBS: 1.05 ± 0.54 mm and 0.52 ± 0.17 mm; ANT-DBS: 1.12 ± 0.74 mm and 0.58 ± 0.24 mm; and Hippo-SEEG: 2.68 ± 1.03 mm and 1.47 ± 0.63 mm. Significant differences were observed in both target and entry point errors between the DBS and Hippo-SEEG groups, with superior accuracy in the DBS group. The entrance errors had a significantly positive correlation with the target errors in the STN-DBS and Hippo-SEEG groups. Moreover, the time consumption in robotic surgery was much shorter than that in the traditional method, without any severe complications. CONCLUSION: The application of robot-assisted lead implantation in NHP neuromodulation research is feasible, accurate, safe, and efficient, and can prospectively be beneficial to neurological studies.

Fixed-Life or Rechargeable Battery for Deep Brain Stimulation: Which Do Patients Prefer?

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is increasingly used to treat a wide variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Implantable pulse generators (implantable pulse generators/batteries) for DBS were originally only available as a nonrechargeable option. However, there is now a choice between fixed-life and rechargeable batteries, with each having their own advantages and disadvantages. The extent of patient involvement in the choice of battery and the factors that matter to them have not been well studied. METHODS: Thirty consecutive adult patients with movement disorders attending a pre-DBS clinic were offered a choice of fixed-life or rechargeable battery and completed a questionnaire after the consultation on which factors influenced their decision. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (63%) chose the fixed-life battery and 11 patients (37%) chose the rechargeable battery. There were no significant differences in age, sex, underlying disease, disease duration or Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (part 3) score (for patients with Parkinson disease) between those who chose the fixed-life vs. rechargeable battery. Most patients were not concerned about the size of the battery. Equal numbers were concerned about surgery to replace the battery, and less than half were concerned about the need to recharge the battery. More than half of patients felt that an acceptable charging frequency was monthly or yearly, and all patients felt that an acceptable charging duration was less than 1 hour, with half of all patients choosing less than 30 min. The main reasons cited for choosing the fixed-life battery were convenience and concern about forgetting to recharge the battery. The main reason for choosing the rechargeable battery was the avoidance of further surgery. DISCUSSION: Most patients in this adult cohort with movement disorders chose the fixed-life battery. The better lifestyle associated with a fixed-life battery is a major factor influencing their choice. Rechargeable batteries may be more acceptable if the recharging process is improved, more convenient, and discreet. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors' institution has received educational grants from Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific companies.

Accuracy of Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Deep Brain Stimulation-A Prospective Noninferiority Study.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical response to deep brain stimulation (DBS) strongly depends on the appropriate placement of the electrode in the targeted structure. Postoperative MRI is recognized as the gold standard to verify the DBS-electrode position in relation to the intended anatomical target. However, intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) might be a feasible alternative to MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective noninferiority study, we compared iCT with postoperative MRI (24-72 hours after surgery) in 29 consecutive patients undergoing placement of 58 DBS electrodes. The primary outcome was defined as the difference in Euclidean distance between lead tip coordinates as determined on both imaging modalities, using the lead tip depicted on MRI as reference. Secondary outcomes were difference in radial error and depth, as well as difference in accuracy relative to target. RESULTS: The mean difference between the lead tips was 0.98 ± 0.49 mm (0.97 ± 0.47 mm for the left-sided electrodes and 1.00 ± 0.53 mm for the right-sided electrodes). The upper confidence interval (95% CI, 0.851 to 1.112) did not exceed the noninferiority margin established. The average radial error between lead tips was 0.74 ± 0.48 mm and the average depth error was determined to be 0.53 ± 0.40 mm. The linear Deming regression indicated a good agreement between both imaging modalities regarding accuracy relative to target. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative CT is noninferior to MRI for the verification of the DBS-electrode position. CT and MRI have their specific benefits, but both should be considered equally suitable for assessing accuracy.

Test-retest reliability of a stimulation-locked evoked response to deep brain stimulation in subcallosal cingulate for treatment resistant depression.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the subcallosal cingulate cortex (SCC) is an emerging therapy for treatment resistant depression. Precision targeting of specific white matter fibers is now central to the model of SCC DBS treatment efficacy. A method to confirm SCC DBS target engagement is needed to reduce procedural variance across treatment providers and to optimize DBS parameters for individual patients. We examined the reliability of a novel cortical evoked response that is time-locked to a 2 Hz DBS pulse and shows the propagation of signal from the DBS target. The evoked response was detected in four individuals as a stereotyped series of components within 150 ms of a 6 V DBS pulse, each showing coherent topography on the head surface. Test-retest reliability across four repeated measures over 14 months met or exceeded standards for valid test construction in three of four patients. Several observations in this pilot sample demonstrate the prospective utility of this method to confirm surgical target engagement and instruct parameter selection. The topography of an orbital frontal component on the head surface showed specificity for patterns of forceps minor activation, which may provide a means to confirm DBS location with respect to key white matter structures. A divergent cortical response to unilateral stimulation of left (vs. right) hemisphere underscores the need for feedback acuity on the level of a single electrode, despite bilateral presentation of therapeutic stimulation. Results demonstrate viability of this method to explore patient-specific cortical responsivity to DBS for brain-circuit pathologies.

Estimating Accurate Target Coordinates with Magnetic Resonance Images by Using Multiple Phase-Encoding Directions during Acquisition.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic procedures are image guided, often using magnetic resonance (MR) images limited by image distortion, which may influence targets for stereotactic procedures. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to assess methods of identifying target coordinates for stereotactic procedures with MR in multiple phase-encoding directions. METHODS: In 30 patients undergoing deep brain stimulation, we acquired 5 image sets: stereotactic brain computed tomography (CT), T2-weighted images (T2WI), and T1WI in both right-to-left (RL) and anterior-to-posterior (AP) phase-encoding directions. Using CT coordinates as a reference, we analyzed anterior commissure and posterior commissure coordinates to identify any distortion relating to phase-encoding direction. RESULTS: Compared with CT coordinates, RL-directed images had more positive x-axis values (0.51 mm in T1WI, 0.58 mm in T2WI). AP-directed images had more negative y-axis values (0.44 mm in T1WI, 0.59 mm in T2WI). We adopted 2 methods to predict CT coordinates with MR image sets: parallel translation and selective choice of axes according to phase-encoding direction. Both were equally effective at predicting CT coordinates using only MR; however, the latter may be easier to use in clinical settings. CONCLUSION: Acquiring MR in multiple phase-encoding directions and selecting axes according to the phase-encoding direction allows identification of more accurate coordinates for stereotactic procedures.