Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
1.
BMC Emerg Med ; 22(1): 170, 2022 10 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36280806

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen. During the pandemic, to contain the spread of COVID-19, there were some integral changes in the medical processes based on the pandemic prevention policy, especially regarding emergency surgery. This study was conducted to investigate whether this pandemic also impacted the decision-making for both patients and medical personnel along with the treatment outcomes. METHODS: Patients of age 18 years or older who were diagnosed clinically and radiologically with acute appendicitis between Jan 1, 2017, and Dec 31, 202,0 were reviewed. The data of 1991 cases were collected and used for this study. Two groups were formed, one group before and the other group after the outbreak. The gathered data included gender, age, appendiceal fecalith, outcomes of treatment, and long-term outcomes of non-operation (8 months follow-up). We also collected details of surgical cases from the above two groups. This data also included age, gender, appendiceal fecalith, fever, jaundice, length of onset before presenting to an emergency department (ED), anesthesia, surgery, white cell count, pathology, complications, and length of stay. We compared the above data respectively and analyzed the differences. RESULTS: Compared to the period before the outbreak, patient visits for acute appendicitis remarkably dropped (19.8%), but surgical cases showed no change (dropped by roughly 5%). There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in failure of non-operation(after the pandemic 8.31% vs. before pandemic 3.22%), interval appendectomy(after pandemic 6.29% vs. before pandemic 12.84%), recurrence(after pandemic 23.27% vs. before pandemic 14.46%), and outcomes of recurrence. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in anesthesia method, surgery way, and complications( before pandemic 4.15% vs. after pandemic9.89% P < 0.05) in patients who underwent the surgery. There was no statistical difference (P > 0.05) concerning age, gender, fever, jaundice, appendiceal fecalith, white cell count, and length of onset before presenting to the ED. CONCLUSION: The current pandemic prevention policy is very effective, but some decision-making processes of doctor-patient have changed in the context of COVID-19 pandemic, that further influenced some treatment outcomes and might lead to a potential economic burden. It is essential to address the undue concern of everyone and optimize the treatment process.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , COVID-19 , Impactación Fecal , Humanos , Lactante , Adolescente , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Apendicectomía/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Internación
2.
J Surg Res ; 238: 113-118, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30769247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Numerous factors contribute to advanced disease or increased complications in patients with acute appendicitis (AA). This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with AA perforation, including the effect of system time (ST) delay, after controlling for patient time (PT) delay. In this study, PT was controlled (to less than or equal to 24 h) to better understand the effect of ST delay on AA perforation. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent surgery for AA at a tertiary referral hospital from October 2009 through September 2013 were reviewed. Data collected included demographics, body mass index, presence of fecalith, PT (i.e., duration of time from symptom onset to arrival in emergency department), and ST (i.e., duration of time from arrival in emergency department to operating room). AA was classified as simple (acute, nonperforated) versus advanced (gangrenous, perforated). RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-seven patients underwent surgery for AA. After excluding patients with PT > 24 h, 445 patients fit the study criteria, of which 358 patients with simple AA and 87 patients with advanced disease. Advanced appendicitis patients were older and had higher body mass index, longer PT, higher WBC, and higher incidence of fecaliths. Both groups had similar ST. Risk factors for advanced appendicitis after multiple regression analysis are age >50 y old, WBC >15,000, the presence of fecaliths, and PT delay >12 h. CONCLUSIONS: Once PT delay was limited to ≤24 h, the ST delay of >12 h did not adversely affect the incidence of advanced AA. Age >50 y, WBC >15,000, PT delay >12 h, and the presence of fecaliths were identified as risk factors associated with advanced AA.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Perforación Intestinal/epidemiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Impactación Fecal/etiología , Impactación Fecal/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
3.
Eur J Pediatr ; 178(2): 235-242, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30421265

RESUMEN

Non-operative treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis in children is gaining ground. Pending definitive evidence regarding its effectiveness, there is a call to evaluate clinical recovery after non-operative treatment. In this study, we analyzed data collected during initial admission of a multicenter prospective cohort in which children, 7-17 year, were treated non-operatively for uncomplicated appendicitis. During admission clinical parameters (pain and gastro-intestinal symptoms), inflammation parameters and sequential abdominal ultrasound were recorded. In total, 45 children were included, 42(93%) were discharged without the need for appendectomy; median [IQR] pain scores on admission were 5 [4-7], decreasing to 2 [0-3] after 1 day of treatment. Initially, 28/42 (67%) reported nausea and 19/42 (45%) vomiting; after 1 day, this was 3/42 (7%) and 1/42 (2%), respectively. White blood cell count declined from a median [IQR] of 12.9 [10.7-16.7] 10E9/L on admission to 7.0 [5.8-9.9] 10E9/L on day 1. Median [IQR] C-reactive protein levels increased from 27.5 [9-69] mg/L on admission to 48 [22-80] mg/L on day 1, declining to 21.5 [11-42] mg/L on day 2. Follow-up ultrasound showed no signs of complicated appendicitis in any of the patients.Conclusion: Clinical symptoms resolved in most children after 1 day of non-operative treatment. This suggests that non-operative treatment is a viable alternative to appendectomy regarding clinical recovery.Trail registration: NCT01356641 What is Known: • Non-operative treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis in children is safe and its use around the world is gaining ground, however high quality evidence from adequately designed randomized trials is still lacking. • Concerns have been raised regarding the potentially prolonged clinical recovery associated with non-operative treatment. What is New: • Most clinical symptoms resolve after 1 day of non-operative treatment in the majority of children.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Dolor Abdominal/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Tratamiento Conservador/efectos adversos , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Dimensión del Dolor , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía
4.
Age Ageing ; 46(1): 119-124, 2017 01 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28181648

RESUMEN

Background: Faecal impaction (FI) is a common problem in old people living in nursing home. Its prevalence and associated factors remain unknown in the general population. Aim: To evaluate FI prevalence in the Spanish population older than 65 years and to assess the factors associated with it. Methods: A telephone survey was carried out of a Spanish population older than 65 years random sample (N = 1000). FI was assessed using a previously validated questionnaire. Results: A total of 28,128 calls were made; 1,431 subjects were eligible and 1,000 subjects were enrollled, mean aged 74.6 ± 7.3 (65­97); 57.5% were women. At least 53 people reported FI within the past year (5.3% (CI 95%: 3.9­6.7%)). Only 0.03% met criteria for chronic constipation and faecal incontinence. FI-associated factors were constipation, female gender, reduced physical activity, and chronic renal failure (CRF). Conclusion: FI is a prevalent problem in old Spanish population. Constipation and female gender are the main associated factors; low physical activity and CRF appear to play also a significant role. Further studies are required to confirm this association.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento , Comorbilidad , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Masculino , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta Sedentaria , Factores Sexuales , España/epidemiología
5.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 50(7): 572-7, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26669560

RESUMEN

GOALS: The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and associated charges of fecal impaction for trends in hospital and patient demographics in emergency departments (ED) across the United States. BACKGROUND: In 2010, an ICD-9-CM code (560.32) for fecal impaction was introduced, allowing for assessment of fecal impaction incidence. STUDY: Data were obtained from the National Emergency Department Sample records in which fecal impaction (ICD-9-CM code 560.32) was first listed as a diagnosis in 2011. RESULTS: In 2011, there were 42,481 [95% confidence interval (CI), 39,908-45,054] fecal impaction ED visits, with an overall rate of 32 fecal impaction visits per 100,000 ED visits. Adjusted for inflation in 2014 dollars, the associated mean charge of a fecal impaction ED visit was $3060.47 (95% CI, $2943.02-$3177.92), with an aggregate national charge in the US of $130,010,772 (95% CI, $120,688,659-$139,332,885). All charges were adjusted for inflation and reported in 2014 dollars. Late elders (85+ y) had the highest rate of fecal impaction ED visits, followed by early elders (65 to 84 y). Medicare was the primary payer for the greatest number of fecal impaction ED visits accounting for nearly two thirds of visit payments. CONCLUSION: This study reports previously unexplored statistics on the number, frequency, and associated charges of ED visits with a primary diagnosis of fecal impaction, a condition found most commonly among elders.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Impactación Fecal/economía , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
Can J Surg ; 58(1): 10-4, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25427333

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the association between the presence of a fecalith and acute/nonperforated appendicitis, gangrenous/perforated appendicitis and the healthy appendix. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed appendectomies performed between October 2003 and February 2012. We collected data on age, sex, appendix histology and the presence of a fecalith. RESULTS: During the study period, 1357 appendectomies were performed. Fecaliths were present in 186 patients (13.7%). There were 94 male (50.5%) and 92 female patients, and the mean age was 32 (range of 10-76) years. The fecalith rate was 13%- 16% and was nonexistant after age 80 years. The main groups with fecaliths were those with acute/nonperforated appendicitis (n = 121, 65.1%, p = 0.041) and those with a healthy appendix (n = 65, 34.9%, p = 0.003). The presence of fecaliths in the gangrenous/perforated appendicitis group was not significant (n = 19, 10.2%, p = 0.93). There were no fecaliths in patients with serositis, carcinoid or carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm the theory of a statistical association between the presence of a fecalith and acute (nonperforated) appendicitis in adults. There was also a significant association between the healthy appendix and asymptomatic fecaliths. There was no correlation between a gangrenous/perforated appendix and the presence of a fecalith. The fecalith is an incidental finding and not always the primary cause of acute (nonperforated) appendictis or gangrenous (perforated) appendicitis. Further research on the topic is recommended.


CONTEXTE: Nous avons voulu examiner le lien entre la présence d'un fécalome et l'appendicite aiguë/non perforée, l'appendicite gangreneuse/perforée et un appendice sain. MÉTHODES: Nous avons analysé de manière rétrospective les appendicectomies effectuées entre octobre 2003 et février 2012. Nous avons recueilli des données sur l'âge, le sexe, l'histologie de l'appendice et la présence d'un fécalome. RÉSULTANTS: Durant la période de l'étude, 1357 appendicectomies ont été effectuées. Des fécalomes étaient présents chez 186 patients (13,7 %). L'étude regroupait 94 hommes (50,5 %) et 92 femmes; l'âge moyen était de 32 ans (entre 10 et 76 ans). Le taux de fécalome était de 13 % à 16 % et non existant après l'âge de 80 ans. Les principaux groupes porteurs de fécalomes étaient ceux qui présentaient une appendicite aiguë/non perforée (n = 121, 65,1 %, p = 0,041) et ceux dont l'appendice était sain (n = 65, 34,9 %, p = 0,003). La présence de fécalomes dans le groupe souffrant d'appendicite gangreneuse/perforée s'est révélée non significative (n = 19, 10,2 %, p = 0,93). Les patients qui souffraient de sérosite, de carcinoïde ou de carcinome ne présentaient pas de fécalomes. CONCLUSION: Nos données confirment la théorie d'un lien statistique entre la présence d'un fécalome et une appendicite aiguë (non perforée) chez l'adulte. On a également observé un lien significatif entre un appendice sain et des fécalomes asymptomatiques. On n'a observé aucune corrélation entre un appendice gangreneux/perforé et la présence de fécalomes. Le fécalome est une observation accessoire qui n'est pas toujours la principale cause de l'appendicite aiguë (non perforée) ou de l'appendicite gangreneuse (perforée). Une recherche plus approfondie à ce sujet est recommandée.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apéndice/patología , Niño , Edema/patología , Femenino , Gangrena , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Membrana Serosa/patología , Trinidad y Tobago/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 16(9): 404, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25119877

RESUMEN

Fecal impaction (FI) is a common and potentially serious medical condition that occurs in all age groups. Children, incapacitated patients, and the institutionalized elderly are considered the highest at-risk populations. FI usually occurs in the setting of chronic or severe constipation, anatomic anorectal abnormalities, and neurogenic or functional gastrointestinal disorders. Generally, FI is a preventable disorder, and early recognition is important, as it is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and high health care costs. Evaluation with a careful history and physical examination, in conjunction with radiologic imaging, such as an acute abdominal series or computed tomography (CT), is imperative. Prompt identification and treatment minimize the risk of complications attributable to FI, which may include bowel obstruction leading to stercoral ulcer, perforation, peritonitis, or cardiopulmonary collapse with hemodynamic instability. Treatment options include manual fragmentation and extraction of the fecal mass, distal colonic cleansing using enemas and rectal lavage with the aid of a sigmoidoscope, and/or using water-soluble contrast media such as Gastrografin to both identify the extent of the impaction and aid in cleansing and removal. Surgical resection of the involved colon or rectum is reserved for peritonitis resulting from bowel perforation. Since recurrence is common, implementing preventive measures such as increasing daily water and fiber intake, limiting medications that decrease colonic motility, using secretagogues or prokinetic agents, and treating underlying anatomic defects are highly important.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
8.
BMC Geriatr ; 13: 24, 2013 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23496919

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies on the epidemiology of fecal impaction are limited by the absence of a valid and reliable instrument to identify the condition in the elderly. Our aim is to validate a questionnaire for identifying fecal impaction in the elderly and to assess the impact of cognitive impairment and the aid of a proxy on its reliability. METHODS: We developed a 5 questions' questionnaire. The questionnaire was presented to twenty doctors to test its face validity. Feasibility was pre-tested with ten non institutionalized subjects who completed the questionnaire twice, once alone or with the help of a proxy, and another along with the researcher.For the validation of the questionnaire all residents in a single nursing-home were invited to participate, allowing the self-decision of using a proxy. Medical records of all subjects were abstracted without knowledge of subjects' answers and agreement between fecal impaction according to self-reported and medical records analyzed. Physical impairment was measured with the Barthel's test and cognitive impairment with the mini-mental test. RESULTS: In the face validity only minor changes in wording were suggested. In the feasibility pre-test all subjects were able to understand and complete the questionnaire and all questions were considered appropriate and easily understandable.One-hundred and ninety-nine of the 244 residents participated in the study (mean age 86,1 ± 6,6). One hundred and forty two subjects understood all questions; not understanding them was inversely associated with cognitive impairment score (aOR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.82-0.91). One hundred and sixty decided to use a proxy; the use of a proxy was inversely associated with educative level (0.13 (0.02-0.72), minimental's score (0.85; 0.76-0.95) and Barthel's score (0.96; 0.94-0.99). Agreement between medical records and self-completed questionnaire was 85.9% (kappa 0.72 (0,62- 0,82). Disagreement was unrelated to education and cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Our simple questionnaire is reliable for identifying fecal impaction in the elderly by self-report. Limitation imposed by cognitive impairment is minimized with the aid of a proxy.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Apoderado , Autoinforme/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Casas de Salud/normas , Apoderado/psicología
9.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 11: 17, 2011 Mar 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21385443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic are the cornerstone in the treatment of schizophrenia. They also have a number of side-effects. Constipation is thought to be common, and a potential serious side-effect, which has received little attention in recent literature. METHOD: We performed a retrospective study in consecutively admitted patients, between 2007 and 2009 and treated with antipsychotic medication, linking different electronic patient data to evaluate the prevalence and severity of constipation in patients with schizophrenia under routine treatment conditions. RESULTS: Over a period of 22 months 36.3% of patients (99) received at least once a pharmacological treatment for constipation. On average medication for constipation was prescribed for 273 days. Severe cases (N = 50), non-responsive to initial treatment, got a plain x-ray of the abdomen. In 68.4% fecal impaction was found. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of constipation, often severe and needing medical interventions, was confirmed during the study period. Early detection, monitoring over treatment and early intervention of constipation could prevent serious consequences such as ileus.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Estreñimiento/inducido químicamente , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aripiprazol , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Clozapina/uso terapéutico , Estreñimiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Enema , Impactación Fecal/inducido químicamente , Impactación Fecal/tratamiento farmacológico , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Femenino , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lactulosa/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Prevalencia , Quinolonas/efectos adversos , Quinolonas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Risperidona/efectos adversos , Risperidona/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
10.
J Pediatr ; 157(4): 598-602, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20542295

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the beneficial effects of Lactobacillus reuteri (DSM 17938) in infants with functional chronic constipation. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study was conducted from January 2008 to December 2008 in 44 consecutive infants at least 6 months old (mean age+/-SD, 8.2+/-2.4 SD; male/female, 24/20) admitted to the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Motility Unit of the Department of Pediatrics, University "Federico II" of Naples, with a diagnosis of functional chronic constipation. The 44 infants with chronic constipation were randomly assigned to 2 groups: group A (n=22) received supplementation with the probiotic L reuteri (DSM 17938) and group B (n=22) received an identical placebo. Primary outcome measures were frequency of bowel movements per week, stool consistency, and presence of inconsolable crying episodes, recorded in a daily diary by parents. RESULTS: Infants receiving L reuteri (DSM 17938) had a significantly higher frequency of bowel movements than infants receiving a placebo at week 2 (P=.042), week 4 (P=.008), and week 8 (P=.027) of supplementation. In the L reuteri group, the stool consistency was reported as hard in 19 infants (86.4%) at baseline, in 11 infants (50%) at week 2, and in 4 infants (18.2%) at weeks 4 and 8. However, there was no significant difference between L reuteri and placebo groups in the stool consistency at all weeks (P=.63, week 2; P=.38, week 4; P=.48, week 8). Similarly, there was no statistically difference in the 2 groups in the presence of inconsolable crying episodes. No adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of L reuteri (DSM 17938) in infants with chronic constipation had a positive effect on bowel frequency, even when there was no improvement in stool consistency and episodes of inconsolable crying episodes. Because of their safety profile, probiotics may be an attractive option in the treatment of functional constipation.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estreñimiento/microbiología , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/microbiología , Lactobacillus/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedad Crónica , Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Llanto , Método Doble Ciego , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Prevalencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
11.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 31(3): 368-370, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30973086

RESUMEN

In contrast to conventional commercial poultry, which are raised primarily in controlled indoor environments, backyard poultry are typically raised in less restricted settings, potentially exposing them to a greater variety of ingestible substances, including multiple types of forage. Consequently, problems such as gastrointestinal impactions caused by ingesta have been noted in backyard poultry. To determine the prevalence of these impactions in backyard poultry, we performed a retrospective database search for autopsy submissions to the California Animal Health and Food Safety laboratory system and found that gastrointestinal impaction was associated with the death of 42 backyard poultry cases (40 chickens, 1 turkey, and 1 goose) from January 2013 to July 2018. In 32 of these 42 (76%) cases, the impaction was caused by fibrous plant material, 7 (17%) by compacted feed, and 3 (7%) by miscellaneous ingesta (tortilla, plastic, and wood shavings). The large proportion of grass impactions indicate that foraging is the predominant source of impaction material in backyard poultry, and that long grasses may be a significant health hazard for poultry. Backyard, pasture-raised, and free-range poultry producers are advised to maintain short pastures, avoid feeds that may expand in the gastrointestinal tract, and provide adequate grit to prevent impactions.


Asunto(s)
Pollos , Impactación Fecal/veterinaria , Gansos , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Pavos , Animales , California/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/clasificación , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/etiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/clasificación , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/etiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
12.
Colorectal Dis ; 10(1): 84-8, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17441968

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There is no objective means to assess the obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS), to allow evaluation of outcome or to compare the efficacy of treatment including surgery. The study aimed to validate a disease-specific index to quantify severity to allow assessment of the results of treatment in clinical trials, to permit comparison between them. METHOD: Seventy-six patients with ODS and 30 healthy controls entered the study after proctologic and ano-rectal physiological investigation. Hirschsprung's disease and slow transit constipation were excluded. An eight-item questionnaire with four or five possible answers was administered by two independent researchers at two different times. The ODS score was the sum of all points with a maximum possible of 31 points. Agreement between the two operators was evaluated by the Kappa coefficient for each single item. The coefficient of repeatability (CR) was assessed by the Bland and Altman plot. The internal consistency was evaluated by the Crohnbach-alpha test. A cluster analysis was carried out on each clinical finding. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare median ODS score between patients and controls. RESULTS: The ODS score of the two operators was normally distributed and strongly correlated (r = 0.89). The correlation coefficient between the score assigned to each item by two operators ranged from 0.79 to 0.98. The degree of agreement between the operators was good and the two methods were reproducible (CR = 3.13). There was a significant difference between the mean ODS score for patients and controls (t = 20.70, P < 0.001). The Crohnbach alpha value for internal reliability was +0.513. Cluster analysis showed a different profile between cluster 1 (a nonhomogenous group including rectocoele, intussusception or perineal descent), and cluster 2 (pelvic dysynergia). CONCLUSION: The ODS score offers a validated severity of disease index in grading the severity of disease and monitoring the efficacy of therapy.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Análisis por Conglomerados , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estreñimiento/terapia , Defecografía , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico , Obstrucción Intestinal/epidemiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Probabilidad , Valores de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Síndrome , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
JAMA Surg ; 153(11): 1021-1027, 2018 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30046808

RESUMEN

Importance: The influence of disease severity on outcomes and use of health care resources in children with complicated appendicitis is poorly characterized. Adjustment for variation in disease severity may have implications for ensuring fair reimbursement and comparative performance reporting among hospitals. Objective: To examine the association of intraoperative findings as a measure of disease severity with complication rates and resource use in children with complicated appendicitis. Design: This retrospective cohort study used clinical data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program pediatric appendectomy pilot database (NSQIP-P database) and cost data from the Pediatric Health Information System database. Twenty-two children's hospitals participated in the NSQIP Pediatric Appendectomy Collaborative Pilot Project. Patients aged 3 to 18 years with complicated appendicitis who underwent an appendectomy from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2014, were included in the study. Appendicitis was categorized in the NSQIP-P database as complicated if any of the following 4 intraoperative findings occurred in the operative report: visible hole, fibropurulent exudate in more than 2 quadrants, abscess, or extraluminal fecalith. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2014. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-day postoperative adverse event rate, revisit rate, hospital cost, and length of stay. Multivariable regression was used to estimate event rates and outcomes for all observed combinations of intraoperative findings, with adjusting for patient characteristics and clustering within hospitals. Results: A total of 1333 patients (58.7% boys; median age, 10 years; interquartile range, 7-12 years) were included; multiple intraoperative findings of complicated appendicitis were reported in 589 (44.2%). Compared with single findings, the presence of multiple findings was associated with higher rates of surgical site infection (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.95-2.06; P = .09), higher revisit rates (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.15-2.21; P = .005), longer length of stay (rate ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.36-1.55; P < .001), and higher hospital cost (rate ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.19-1.53; P < .001). Significant differences were found among different combinations of intraoperative findings for all outcomes, including a 3.6-fold difference in rates of surgical site infection (range, 7.5% for fecalith alone to 27.2% for all 4 findings; P = .002), a 2.6-fold difference in revisit rates (range, 8.9% for exudate alone to 22.9% for all 4 findings; P = .001), a 2.2-fold difference in length of stay (range, 4.0 days for exudate alone to 8.9 days for all 4 findings; P < .001), and a 2.4-fold difference in mean cumulative cost (range, $13 296 for exudate alone to $32 282 for all 4 findings; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: More severe presentations of complicated appendicitis are associated with worse outcomes and greater resource use. Severity adjustment may be needed to ensure fair reimbursement and comparative performance reporting, particularly at hospitals treating underserved populations where more severe presentations are common.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis/cirugía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Absceso Abdominal/epidemiología , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Adolescente , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Exudados y Transudados , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Dig Dis ; 25(2): 160-5, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17468552

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intestinal complaints are a frequent health concern for elderly people and their care providers. AIMS: To explore the distinction between constipation and the subjective complaints in elderly people and to review the diagnosis, causes and treatment of constipation, fecal impaction, and fecal incontinence. METHODS: Review of studies that give information on prevalence, causes, symptoms, and treatment of bowel problems in the elderly, excluding uncontrolled clinical observations. RESULTS: Self-reported constipation and laxative use increase with age and are more common among women, blacks and people of low socio-economic level. The patient's pharmacological history is fundamental, because medications are the cause of up to 40% of chronic constipation, and are often used inappropriately. The results of most laxative trials require cautious interpretation, but fiber and laxatives are more effective than placebo against constipation. Much additional research is needed to determine the most cost-effective method of treating intestinal complaints in the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel problems in older people have a considerable impact on the quality of life and have many contributory causes that are often amenable to treatment and management. Results of therapy can be good, leading to alleviation of suffering and the ability to lead a fuller life.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/fisiología , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estreñimiento/terapia , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Catárticos/uso terapéutico , Colon/fisiopatología , Estreñimiento/diagnóstico , Dieta , Ejercicio Físico , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Femenino , Fluidoterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo
15.
BMC Vet Res ; 3: 1, 2007 Feb 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17274808

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colic (abdominal pain) is a clinical condition of serious concern affecting the welfare and survival of donkeys at the Donkey Sanctuary in the UK. One of the most commonly reported causes is due to impacted ingesta in the large intestine ("impaction colic"). However little is known about the incidence of, or risk factors for, this condition. Here we describe the epidemiology of colic in donkeys, specifically impaction colic. We focus on temporal aspects of the disease and we identify environmental and management related risk factors for impaction colic in UK donkeys. RESULTS: There were 807 colic episodes in the population of 4596 donkeys between January 1st 2000 and March 31st 2005. The majority (54.8%) of episodes were due to a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of impaction of the gastrointestinal tract. The mortality risk for all colics (51.1%) was higher than reported in other equids. The incidence rate of all colics (5.9 episodes per 100 donkeys per year) and of impaction colic (3.2 episodes) was similar to that in horses. A retrospective matched case-control study of all impaction colics from January 2003 (193) indicated that older donkeys, those fed extra rations and those that previously suffered colic were at increased risk of impaction. Lighter body weight, musculo-skeletal problems, farm and dental disease were also significantly associated with a diagnosis of impaction colic. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge this is the first study to estimate the incidence rate of colic in a large population of donkeys in the UK. In contrast to other equids, impaction was the most commonly reported cause of colic. We identified several risk factors for impaction colic. Increasing age, extra rations and previous colic are known risk factors for colic in other equids. Results support the hypothesis that dental disease is associated with impaction colic. Musculo-skeletal problems may be associated with colic for various reasons including change in amount of exercise or time at pasture. Other associated factors (weight and farm) are the subject of further research. Identification of risk factors for impaction colic may highlight high risk donkeys and may allow intervention strategies to be introduced to reduce the incidence of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Cólico/veterinaria , Equidae , Impactación Fecal/veterinaria , Envejecimiento , Animales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cólico/diagnóstico , Cólico/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estaciones del Año , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Estomatognáticas/veterinaria , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido/epidemiología
16.
Rev Enferm ; 30(5): 42-8, 2007 May.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17623945

RESUMEN

Bed ridden patients commonly suffer a series of intestinal disorders which include: loss of appetite, swallowing disorders, a tendency to undergo gastric tract reflux, slowness in intestinal movements, accumulation of gas or fecal impactation. These contribute to an increased risk of potentially dangerous complications such as intestinal obstruction which can lead to necrosis or a perforation of different parts of the digestive tract, duodenal ulcer, hemorrhoids, or anal fissures.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Enfermedades Intestinales/prevención & control , Reposo en Cama , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Enfermedades Intestinales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Intestinales/enfermería
17.
Equine Vet J ; 38(5): 479-84, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16986610

RESUMEN

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: There is little information on the prevalence of, and risk factors associated with, post anaesthetic colic (PAC) in horses undergoing nonabdominal operations. OBJECTIVES: To undertake the first prospective study of prevalence of PAC and identify risk factors in its development in nonabdominal procedures. METHODS: A multicentre prospective case-control study was conducted, on every horse undergoing anaesthesia for a nonabdominal procedure between April 2004 and June 2005. Colic cases were defined as any horse with recognised signs of abdominal pain within 72 h of general anaesthesia that could not be attributed to any concurrent disease. Five control horses per case were selected randomly from the study population at all hospitals. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between predictor variables and the risk of developing PAC. RESULTS: The estimated mean prevalence of PAC in the study population was 5.2% (95% CI, 2.8, 8.0). However, the prevalence of colic varied between each centre. The most commonly diagnosed cause of colic was impaction. Multivariable analyses showed that the centre involved and the type of surgery performed were associated with an increased risk of PAC. Preoperative food deprivation and the use of opioid drugs were confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of PAC varied significantly between the 4 hospitals studied; there may be hospital-related covariates that account for this. The type of surgery performed influenced the risk of PAC. POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: Identifying the risk factors for PAC is a prerequisite for its prevention. This study indicates horses at increased risk of PAC that might benefit from a more critical evaluation of post anaesthetic gastrointestinal function and/or the provision of preventative measures. Further investigation is required to explain the variation in prevalence of PAC between centres.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/veterinaria , Cólico/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/veterinaria , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Animales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cólico/inducido químicamente , Cólico/epidemiología , Cólico/prevención & control , Intervalos de Confianza , Ayuno , Impactación Fecal/complicaciones , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de los Caballos/prevención & control , Caballos , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/inducido químicamente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Pediatrics ; 89(6 Pt 1): 1007-9, 1992 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1594338

RESUMEN

Fecal soiling is a common complaint among school-age children. The fecal soiling is often accompanied by chronic constipation and so-called "idiopathic," "functional," or "psychogenic" megacolon, the cause of which is undetermined. The records of all children presenting to a pediatric gastroenterology clinic between 1981 and 1990 with difficult defecation were reviewed to determine the incidence of painful defecation and its relationship to chronic impaction and fecal soiling. There were 227 children; 74 were younger than 36 months of age and 153 were older than 36 months. Of the younger children, 86% presented with pain, 71% with impaction, and 97% with severe withholding. The younger children had painful defecation for a mean of 14 +/- 9 (SD) months before presentation. Of the older children, 85% presented with fecal soiling, 57% with pain, and 73% with fecal impaction, and 96% exhibited withholding; the older children had difficult defecation for a mean of 56 +/- 42 months before presentation. Sixty-three percent of the children presenting with fecal soiling had a history of painful defecation beginning before 36 months of age. Painful defecation frequently precedes chronic fecal impaction and fecal soiling in American children. Early, effective treatment of painful defecation in infancy might reduce the incidence of chronic fecal impaction and fecal soiling in school-age children.


Asunto(s)
Defecación , Dolor/etiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino
19.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 206(5): 679-85, 1995 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7744691

RESUMEN

Medical records from all horses with large colon impaction admitted between 1985 and 1991 were examined. Large colon impaction was diagnosed in 147 of 1,100 (13.4%) horses with colic. One hundred thirty horses were admitted for further evaluation of acute onset of abdominal pain after having been examined and treated by referring veterinarians, and 17 horses that were hospitalized for unrelated medical problems developed large colon impaction. Female horses (92/147; 62.6%) were more commonly affected than males. The age ranged from 1 to 29 years (median, 7.1 years). Mean duration of clinical signs of abdominal pain prior to referral was 32 hours. At admittance, signs of abdominal pain were not detectable in 70/147 (48%) horses, and were mild in 50 (34%), moderate in 16 (11%), and severe in 11 (7%). Heart rate ranged from 30 to 86 beats/min (median, 44 beats/min), and most horses had a decrease in gastrointestinal sounds. Transrectal palpation was used to identify the impaction location as being the pelvic flexure in 103 (70.1%) horses, colon on the left side in 30 (20.4%) horses, and colon on the right side in 14 (9.5%) horses. All 147 horses received fluids i.v. and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications or sedatives, including flunixin meglumine (124 horses, 84.3%) xylazine hydrochloride (81, 55%), butorphanol (6, 0.04%), and detomidine hydrochloride (9, 0.04%). Duration of medical treatment required to resolve the impaction ranged from 1 to 6 days (mean, 2 days). In addition to medical treatment, 24 (16.3%) horses also required surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/veterinaria , Impactación Fecal/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/etiología , Enfermedades de los Caballos/mortalidad , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Animales , Enfermedades del Colon/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Colon/etiología , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Colon/terapia , Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Impactación Fecal/etiología , Impactación Fecal/mortalidad , Impactación Fecal/terapia , Femenino , Enfermedades de los Caballos/terapia , Caballos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
20.
PLoS One ; 9(8): e105281, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25148393

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are no existing studies that provide data regarding the epidemiology of, and risk factors for, fecal impaction, either in the general population or in any sub-group of people. OBJECTIVE: Estimate the prevalence of and factors associated with fecal impaction on a representative sample of the institutionalized elderly population. DESIGN: Two-phase study. Phase 1: pilot study validating the methodology in which all residents of a single nursing home participated. Phase 2: national multi-center cross-sectional study. SETTING: 34 randomly selected nursing homes. MEASUREMENTS: The presence of fecal impaction and associated factors were evaluated using three different tools: data collected from medical records; a self-completion questionnaire filled out by the subjects or a proxy; and a rectal examination. SUBJECTS: Older subjects living in nursing homes. RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic constipation was 70.7% (95%CI: 67.3-74.1%), of which 95.9% of patients were properly diagnosed and 43.1% were properly controlled. The prevalence of FI according to patient history was 47.3% (43.6-51.0%) and 6.6% (4.7-8.5%) according to rectal examination. Controlled constipation (OR: 9.8 [5.2-18.4]) and uncontrolled constipation (OR: 37.21 [19.7-70.1]), the number of medications (OR: 1.2 [1.1-1.3]), reduced functional capacity (OR: 0.98 [0.97-0.99]) and the occasional use of NSAIDs were independent risk factors for fecal impaction. CONCLUSIONS: Constipation affects more than 70% of people living in nursing homes. Although it is properly diagnosed in more than 95% of cases, the disease is only controlled in less than 50%. Constipation, especially when not controlled, is the most significant risk factor leading to fecal impaction, which is prevalent in almost 50% of this population.


Asunto(s)
Impactación Fecal/epidemiología , Casas de Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Impactación Fecal/diagnóstico , Impactación Fecal/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Laxativos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda