Severe mandibular atrophy treated with a subperiosteal implant and simultaneous graft with rhBMP-2 and mineralized allograft: a case report.

A 71-year-old patient was successfully rehabilitated by means of a 3D model-derived, hydroxyapatite-coated titanium subperiosteal mandibular implant. The implant was specifically designed to allow bone augmentation. The deficient bone was simultaneously grafted with mineralized bone allograft and recombinant bone morphogenetic protein -2 (rhBMP-2). The 32-month postoperative cone beam computerized tomography follow-up showed vertical bone augmentation beneath the implant frame.

The Custom Endosteal Implant: histology and case report of a retrieved maxillary custom osseous-integrated implant nine years in service.

The Custom Endosteal Implant (CEI) is a custom-cast osseo-integrated implant that has evolved to replace the "old" fibro-integrated subperiosteal variant. This newly developed implant achieves osseous integration by utilizing a hydroxyapatite (HA) coating, and a specialized grafting technique that produces much improved success rates relative to its fibro-integrated subperiosteal predecessor. This case reported here represents a maxillary CEI implant that was placed and in functional service for 9 years before being retrieved and processed for histologic examination subsequent to the patient's demise. In addition, due to infection that occurred shortly after placement, an early provisional procedure with fluoridated HA was also performed. Histologic analysis of the postmortem specimen revealed a fully integrated new bone formation intimately surrounding the previously dehisced implant strut. The latter had previously been decontaminated and grafted with a thin layer of fluorapatite (FA) material. Results including histologic analysis confirmed complete osseo-integration of the implant following successful FA graft revision.

Microbiological aspects of human mandibular subperiosteal dental implants.

Clinical, microbiological, and biochemical features of human mandibular subperiosteal dental implants exhibiting peri-implantitis were compared with those experiencing long-term peri-implant health. After evaluation of clinical parameters, submucosal plaque samples were obtained from permucosal implant abutment posts exhibiting probing depths ≥5 mm and bleeding on probing in subjects with peri-implantitis (n = 3) and from posts with peri-implant health in subjects with long-term subperiosteal implant health (n = 8). The microbial specimens were transported in VMGA III and plated onto enriched Brucella blood agar and Hammond's selective medium with anaerobic incubation, and onto selective TSBV with 5% CO2 incubation. Total anaerobic viable counts and selected bacterial species were identified using established phenotypic methods and criteria. In vitro resistance to doxycycline (2 µg/mL), amoxicillin (2 µg/mL), or metronidazole (4 µg/mL) was recorded per subject when bacterial pathogen growth was noted on antibiotic-supplemented isolation plates. Interleukin (IL)-1ß levels were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in peri-implant crevicular fluid samples from 5 study subjects. Significantly higher Plaque Index scores, higher total anaerobic viable counts, more red complex species, and lower proportions of gram-positive facultative viridans streptococci and Actinomyces species were detected on peri-implantitis-affected subperiosteal implants as compared with subperiosteal implants with long-term peri-implant health. No in vitro resistance to the 3 test antibiotic breakpoint concentrations studied was found, except a Fusobacterium nucleatum strain resistant to doxycycline at 2 µg/mL from 1 peri-implantitis subject. Subperiosteal implants with peri-implantitis tended to yield higher peri-implant crevicular fluid IL-1ß levels. The level of peri-implant supramucosal plaque control and the composition of the peri-implant submucosal microbiome may be important determinants of the long-term clinical status of mandibular subperiosteal dental implants.

Application of alpha-tricalcium phosphate coatings on titanium subperiosteal orthodontic implants reduces the time for absolute anchorage: a study using rabbit femora.

We are currently developing a small perforated titanium subperiosteal implant specifically for orthodontic therapy, which can be placed anywhere on the bone surface. In the present study, we coated this implant with hydroxyapatite (HA) or alpha-tricalcium phosphate (alpha-TCP) in an attempt to shorten the initial stabilization period relative to the few months that is usually required. The coated implants were placed beneath the periosteum in rabbit femora. The implants were observed by radiographically and histologically, and measured the tensile strength of the bone-implant interface. Two weeks after placement, the volume of new bone formed in the perforations of the implant was significantly greater for the alpha-TCP-coated implants than for the HA-coated implants. Our findings indicate that new bone is formed faster in the surrounding area with alpha-TCP- and HA-coated subperiosteal implants than with uncoated implants, and that alpha-TCP is a particularly effective stimulator of new bone formation.

The use of laser technology (Er;Cr:YSGG) and stereolithography to aid in the placement of a subperiosteal implant: case study.

The use of laser technology has helped this clinician to provide treatment with less postoperative pain and increased healing. The subperiosteal implant is a modality that has been used for several decades, although its popularity has declined in favor of endosseous dental implants. In some instances, however, it remains the treatment of choice, specifically in the atrophic mandible (where placement of endosseous implants is not possible) or when placement would increase the chances of jaw fracture. This article reports the case of a patient rehabilitated using a simplified surgical protocol involving laser surgery and stereolithography.

Osseointegration of a subperiosteal anchoring device in the minipig mandible.

INTRODUCTION: Onplants serve as subperiosteal anchorage in the maxilla to facilitate tooth movement. We determined the applicability of onplants and the process of osseointegration in the mandible of minipigs. METHODS: Thirty-six onplants (OnPlants, Nobel Biocare USA, Yorba Linda, Calif) were positioned in 9 adult animals, 2 on each side. At 3, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery, 3 minipigs were killed. Undecalcified ground sections were evaluated histologically and histomorphometrically. RESULTS: Nineteen onplants were lost during the observation period. Newly formed bone per tissue volume was 7% +/- 5% (n = 4), 21% +/- 9% (n = 5), and 22% +/- 13% (n = 8) at the 3 observation times. The corresponding percentages of bone-to-implant contact were 15% +/- 22%, 30% +/- 27%, and 44% +/- 35%. The number of bone-to-implant contacts remained stable over time at 1.0 +/- 0.9 contacts per millimeter. The average lengths of bone-to-implant contacts were 0.2 +/- 0.1 mm, 0.3 +/- 0.2 mm, and 0.5 +/- 0.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: These results showed a low survival rate of onplants in the mandible and that the early stage of healing is central to the process of osseointegration. Stable placement is a prerequisite for onplant survival in the mandible.

Anchorage capacity of osseointegrated and conventional anchorage systems: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim in this investigation was to evaluate and compare orthodontic anchorage capacity of 4 anchorage systems during leveling/aligning and space closure after maxillary premolar extractions. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients (60 girls, 60 boys; mean age, 14.3 years; SD 1.73) were recruited and randomized into 4 anchorage systems: Onplant (Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden), Orthosystem implant (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland), headgear, and transpalatal bar. The main outcome measures were cephalometric analysis of maxillary first molar and incisor movement, sagittal growth changes of the maxilla, and treatment time. The results were also analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: The maxillary molars were stable during the leveling/aligning in the Onplant, Orthosystem implant, and headgear groups, but the transpalatal bar group had anchorage loss (mean, 1.0 mm; P <.001). During the space-closure phase, the molars were still stable in the Onplant and Orthosystem groups, whereas the headgear and transpalatal bar groups had anchorage loss (means, 1.6 and 1.0 mm, respectively; P <.001). Thus, the Onplant and the Orthosystem implant groups had significantly higher success rates for anchorage than did the headgear and transpalatal bar groups. Compared with the Orthosystem implant, there were more technical problems with the Onplant. CONCLUSIONS: If maximum anchorage is required, the Orthosystem implant is the system of choice.

[Aplication of demineralized human bone matrix in the surgical dental fusion treatment. Report of a case]. / Aplicación de matriz de hueso humano desmineralizado en el procedimiento quirúrgico de la fusión dentaria. Reporte de un caso.

The purpose of this work is to present a surgical alternative in the treatment of the dental fusions through the placement of demineralized human bone matrix (DHBM) (Grafton Putty)*, immediately after the separation and extraction of the fused tooth to the permanent one. The dental fusion is a dental anomaly of union, that consists in the union of two dental germs during development. It could happen at any of the dental germ evolution stages from the dental sheet or from more advanced processes of differentiation. For the clinical treatment, an allograft of DHBM with osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties was used. This had several factors of bone growth, it allowed the gradual growth of a new bone that helped to correct the bone defects post-extraction and to cover the exposed distal wall of the remaining permanent tooth. The clinic evaluation and the periapical and panoramic radiographies images were used for the clinical control. It can be concluded that the surgical separation and the extraction of the tooth with less anatomical likeness to the contralateral and the placement of the DHBM, represent a surgical treatment alternative of the dental fusion.

Modificaciones en el diseño de los implantes subperiósticos personalizados para evitar complicaciones. Presentación de una serie de casos y revisión de la literatura / Design modifications in subperiosteal implants to avoid complications. Presentation of a case series study and literature review

Introducción: La reabsorción severa del maxilar en pacientes totalmente edéntulos en ocasiones imposibilita la colocación de implantes endoóseos estándares para rehabilitar la ausencia de dientes. Para este tipo de atrofias tan severas se patentaron en 1938 en Suecia los implantes subperiósticos. Este tipo de implantes subperiósticos personalizados (ISP) han tenido excelentes resultados a lo largo de estos últimos años pero no están exentos de complicaciones. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es describir las principales complicaciones con este tipo de implantes y cuáles han sido las modificaciones que hemos realizado en el diseño de los mismos para intentar evitarlas.Material y método: Diseñamos un estudio de seguimiento retrospectivo de 15 pacientes con atrofia severa del maxilar superior tratados en 2 centros privados con un ISP en los años 2021 y 2022. Resultados: Los 8 primeros pacientes fueron tratados con un ISP bilateral y los 7 restantes con dos ISP uno a cada lado del maxilar. Todos los pacientes fueron rehabilitados con una prótesis provisional atornillada a las 48 horas de la cirugía y sustituida a los 3 meses por una prótesis fija definitiva. En 5 pacientes (33,33 %) tuvimos complicaciones postoperatorias menores. Conclusiones: A pesar de las limitaciones del estudio consideramos que el uso de ISP en pacientes con atrofia severa del maxilar es un tratamiento predecible y con excelentes resultados. La exposición es la principal complicación en nuestra serie de casos y consideramos que el uso de ISP dobles individuales y de una guía de corte minimizan el riesgo de que aparezca. (AU)

Introduction: Severe resorption of the maxilla in fully edentulous patients sometimes makes it impossible to place standard endoosseous implants to rehabilitate the absence of teeth. For such severe atrophies subperiosteal implants were patented in 1938 in Sweden. This type of subperiosteal implants have had excellent results over the last few years but are not without complications. The aim of our study is to describe the main complications with this type of implants and witch modifications have been made trying to avoid them. Material and method: We designed a retrospective follow-up study of 15 patients with severe upper jaw atrophy treated in 2 private centers with a customized subperiosteal implant in 2021 and 2022, to which we apply a few modifications in the design of the same. Results: First eight patients were treated with a single bilateral subperiosteal implant and the remaining seven with two subperiosteal implants, one on each side of the maxilla. All patients were treated with a temporary prosthesis bolted 48 hours after surgery and replaced at three months with a definitive prosthesis. In five patients (33.33%), we had minor postoperative complications. Conclusions: Despite the limitations of the study, we think that the use of customized subperiosteal implants in patients with severe maxillary atrophy is a predictable treatment with excellent results. Exposure is the main complication in our case series and we consider that the use of individual double subperiosteal implant and a bone cutting guide help to minimize the risk of this complication. (AU)

Cirugía ortognática y rehabilitación implantosoportada simultáneas mediante implantes subperiósticos o supraóseos personalizados / Simultaneous orthognathic surgery and implant-supported rehabilitation using customized subperiosteal or supraosseous implants

Presentamos un caso clínico donde, utilizando implantes subperiósticos o supraóseos, es decir, estructuras metálicas tridimensionales personalizadas de titanio fabricadas de forma digital, hemos conseguido realizar dos objetivos a la vez: 1) la corrección de una severa deformidad facial, y 2) dotar a la paciente de fijaciones o implantes para la rehabilitación implantosoportada de su edentulismo maxilar completo. No tenemos constancia de ningún caso similar publicado en la literatura a día de hoy.Creemos que esta nueva técnica, relativamente sencilla, puede ser una alternativa a las cirugías complejas que involucran el empleo de complicados injertos óseos, con el consiguiente ahorro en tiempo y morbilidad para los pacientes que asocian hipoplasia maxilar y edentulismo con grave atrofia ósea. (AU)

We present a clinical case in which, using subperiosteal or supraosseous implants, that is to say, three-dimensional personalized metallic titanium structures manufactured digitally, we have managed to achieve two objectives at the same time: 1) correction of a severe facial deformity, and 2) furnish the patient with fixations or implants for the implant-supported rehabilitation of her complete maxillary edentulism. We are not aware of any similar case published in the literature to date.We believe that this new, relatively simple technique can be an alternative to complex surgeries that involve the use of complicated bone grafts, with the consequent savings in time and morbidity for patients who associate maxillary hypoplasia and edentulism with severe bone atrophy. (AU)

[Study of static strength of screw connection of intra- and extraosseous parts of the implants LIKo].

An examination was done in an attempt to reveal the connection between configuration of a nexus and the inner and outer-ortho (bone-constituted) parts (supra-structures) of the bi-leveled dental implants at a point of connectivity of the entire system. The ensuing recommendation (in accordance with the examination) focuses on the analysis of the strength of the fixation of the implants' screws with the aim of excluding a possibility of micro-mobility at the connection point of the entire system. The result of the examination yielded the principles of resistance against the lateral pressure, dependent upon the shape of the supra-structures.

[Experience of the osteoplastic material Osteoplast-K use for surgical interventions on parodontal tissues].

Information of the composition and properties of osteoplastic material based on sulphated glycosammoglykans (Osteoplast-K) is given, results of the material use in cases of surgical interventions on parodontium are presented.

The use of prefabricated titanium tissue abutments for the construction of a maxillary subperiosteal implant.

This article presents a bimodal procedure for a patient with an implant-supported fixed partial denture (FP2 class of Misch) where endosteal implants (EOIs) and a subperiosteal implant (SPI) were indicated in different sections of the same arch. In edentulous patients, heterogeneous bone volume and density may be encountered in different regions of the same arch. When the available bone is favorable, the use of EOIs is simpler and less time consuming. An SPI is indicated when the available bone is severely resorbed, as in the type I division C, type II divisions C and D, and type III divisions C and D. The main advantage of the described combined technique is that it offers an alternative to invasive surgeries such as iliac crest bone grafts or various surgical augmentation procedures. The second advantage is the very brief healing period after insertion of the SPI before prosthetic loading. Planning, design, laboratory construction, surgical application, and prosthetic rehabilitation for bimodal implant treatment are described. Prefabricated titanium tissue abutments are used in the fabrication of the posts of the anterior titanium SPI. Titanium tissue abutments are placed in the waxup stage of the SPI before the casting of the titanium SPI. Posterior fixtures are EOIs. An anterior SPI with 4 posts and 4 posterior EOIs provides a combination of support for the screw-retained fixed maxillary denture of Misch's FP2.

Evaluation of New Bone Formation and Osseointegration Around Subperiosteal Titanium Implants with Histometry and Nanoindentation.

PURPOSE: To assess the quality and quantity of newly formed bone around rough-surfaced titanium subperiosteal implants stabilized with two different fixation techniques and to investigate nanoindentation as a method for measuring the elastic properties of the bone around these implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten 6-month-old white rabbits were used in this study. One femur received a subperiosteal implant fixed to the bone with screws. The other femur received a subperiosteal implant stabilized with a trough (bed) in the bone area, plus fixation screws. After a 3-month healing period, the animals were sacrificed and each titanium plate was resected along with the surrounding bone. Histometric measurements of osseointegration were performed on 16 titanium plates, and 16 titanium plates were evaluated qualitatively (hardness and modulus of elasticity) with nanoindentation. A regression model was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Subperiosteal implants placed into a trough performed significantly better than those placed on top of the cortical bone in terms of percentage of bone in direct contact with the titanium plate, length of new bone, and percentage of area of new bone. The mechanical properties (modulus of elasticity, hardness) of the newly formed bone above the plate measured at the microstructural level were significantly inferior to those of the mature cortical bone below the plate. CONCLUSION: Subperiosteal implants placed into a trough performed better than those placed on top of the cortical bone, but it seems that 3 months of healing is not enough to achieve optimal integration and bone maturation around them. Nanoindentation can offer valuable insight into the elastic properties of the microstructural component of the bone.

Use of two implant systems within the same restorative segment: a clinical report.

The incorporation of more than one dental implant system within the same restorative segment may be a reliable approach to treatment. This article describes a clinical situation that was resolved, after the failure of a pre-existing subperiosteal implant, by the use of both subperiosteal and osseointegrated fixtures concurrently. The result was an increase in stability, and it is hoped that restoration settling will be minimized.

Use of subperiosteal implants with distal filling ports in the correction of the atrophic alveolar ridge.

A subperiosteal tissue expander with a filling port attached to the distal end of the prosthesis has been successfully used on 10 patients during the past 2 years. The design has resulted in eliminating the dehiscence problem encountered when the midline incision was used to insert the original expander and its centrally placed filling port. The ability to use a bilateral incision or expander insertion has minimized the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve damage in the severely atrophic mandible.

An overview of implant hardware.

This paper overviews dental implants emphasizing design concepts, material composition, and prosthetic abutments. Within the space limitations, all systems can not be shown in total and we do not infer superiority or inferiority with the inclusion or exclusion of any design, concept, or abutment.

The restorative and surgical technique for the full maxillary subperiosteal implant.

The edentulous atrophic maxilla represents one of the most challenging implant restorative opportunities. When prescribed within the appropriate diagnostic range and performed by a highly skilled and experienced practitioner, the full maxillary subperiosteal implant is a predictable solution for the patient with an edentulous atrophic maxilla.

Improving patient appearance. A look at adjunct maxillofacial soft tissue surgery.

Adjunctive esthetic procedures, performed with the more traditional oral and maxillofacial surgery, can improve patients' total facial appearance. Three examples illustrate dramatic improvements.