RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) based on recent studies, illustrate the safety of this approach, the cost-effectiveness, and present the importance of inclusion protocols for the best results. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent studies, the authors found no evidence of an increased risk of bilateral devastating complications such as endophthalmitis with ISBCS based on descriptive evidence compared to delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS). Furthermore, recent studies on cost analyses showed that ISBCS resulted in fewer costs and significant cost savings to third-party payers, patients, and society compared to DSBCS. SUMMARY: The ISBCS surgical approach decreases hospital visits, reduces costs, and provides rapid visual rehabilitation and neuro adaptation. The risk of bilateral simultaneous complications is now recognized to be very rare with intracameral antibiotics and compliance with correct protocols. With new generations of optical biometry and lens calculation formulas, refractive surprises are occasional for normal eyes. However, refractive surprise is controversial, especially in the implantation of presbyopia correction intra-ocular lenses, which must be evaluated carefully in the ISBCS approach.
Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata , Catarata , Facoemulsificación , Humanos , Facoemulsificación/métodos , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Extracción de Catarata/efectos adversos , Agudeza Visual , Catarata/complicacionesRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Higher degrees of myopia are currently being treated with refractive surgery. However, there is limited characterization and outcomes data for this cohort. This article aims to review the literature on highly myopic patients who had refractive surgery and present a retrospective analysis of 149 patients (270 eyes) with high to extreme myopia (≤-5.0D SE) who underwent refractive surgery [laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), or implantable collamer lense (ICL)] at a single practice. RECENT FINDINGS: There is substantial literature on the efficacy of LASIK, PRK, and phakic intraocular lenses for refractive error correction, but a dearth of studies on patients with high to extreme myopia undergoing different types of refractive surgery. Our study reveals that this cohort of patients has excellent outcomes with minimal complications. SUMMARY: Our study reveals that the average preoperative myopia was highest in ICL patients (-10.03D), followed by PRK (-7.21D), and LASIK (-7.04D) patients. Not surprisingly, eyes with high myopia and thin corneas were offered and elected ICLs for their procedure. Highly myopic patients achieved outcomes consistent with data reported in the literature- average postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 for LASIK and ICL eyes and 20/25 for PRK eyes.
Asunto(s)
Queratectomía Fotorrefractiva , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Queratectomía Fotorrefractiva/métodos , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Queratomileusis por Láser In Situ/métodos , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Miopía Degenerativa/cirugía , Miopía Degenerativa/fisiopatología , Miopía/cirugía , Miopía/fisiopatología , Lentes Intraoculares Fáquicas , Adulto , Masculino , FemeninoRESUMEN
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes, feasibility, and safety between groups with sutured and sutureless wound closure in congenital ectopia lentis (CEL) patients. Methods: Patients with CEL who received phacoemulsification combined with intrascleral fixation of capsular hook (CH) and implantation of capsular tension ring (CTR) and in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) were included in this study. Results: A total of 68 eyes of 34 patients aged 18 years or younger were enrolled in this study. Incisions of 21 patients (34 eyes) did not require sutures while sutures were applied in 21 patients (34 eyes). Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity, best corrected distance visual acuity and intraocular pressure measurements were comparable on follow-up visits (P > 0.05). The magnitude of surgically induced astigmatism was significantly greater (P = 0.001) in the suture group (Median: 0.47; IQ: 1.63, 2.97) than in the sutureless group (Median: 0.88; IQ: 0.63, 1.35). No cases of endophthalmitis and retinal detachment were found postoperatively in either group, while suture-related complications were observed in the sutured group, including loose suture with discomfort in 5 (14.71%) eyes, loose suture with mucus infiltration in 3 (8.82%) eyes. In total, 22 sutures (64.71%) of 34 eyes required removal. Conclusions: Sutureless clear corneal incision in CEL patients can achieve satisfactory clinical results comparable to sutured wound closure in terms of the efficacy and safety. Advantages of this approach are the reduced risk of suture-related complications, no need for additional surgery under general anesthesia for suture removal, and less cost.
Asunto(s)
Córnea , Desplazamiento del Cristalino , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos sin Sutura , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Desplazamiento del Cristalino/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos sin Sutura/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos sin Sutura/efectos adversos , Córnea/cirugía , Córnea/patología , Facoemulsificación/métodos , Facoemulsificación/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Factibilidad , SuturasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cataract, defined as an opacity of the lens in one or both eyes, is the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Cataract may initially be treated with new spectacles, but often surgery is required, which involves removing the cataract and placing a new artificial lens, usually made from hydrophobic acrylic. Recent advancements in intraocular lens (IOL) technology have led to the emergence of a diverse array of implantable lenses that aim to minimise spectacle dependence at all distances (near, intermediate, and distance). To assess the relative merits of these lenses, measurements of visual acuity are needed. Visual acuity is a measurement of the sharpness of vision at a distance of 6 metres (or 20 feet). Normal vision is 6/6 (or 20/20). The Jaegar eye card is used to measure near visual acuity. J1 is the smallest text and J2 is considered equivalent to 6/6 (or 20/20) for near vision. OBJECTIVES: To compare visual outcomes after implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) to those of extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. To produce a brief economic commentary summarising recent economic evaluations that compare trifocal IOLs with EDOF IOLs. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), MEDLINE, Embase, and three trial registries on 15 June 2022. For our economic evaluation, we also searched MEDLINE and Embase using economic search filters to 15 June 2022, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) from 1968 up to and including 31 December 2014. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies comparing trifocal and EDOF IOLs in adults undergoing cataract surgery. We did not include studies involving people receiving IOLs for correction of refractive error alone (or refractive lens exchange in the absence of cataract). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Two review authors working independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data from the reports. We assessed the risk of bias in the studies, and we assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included five studies that compared trifocal and EDOF lenses in people undergoing cataract surgery. Three trifocal lenses (AcrySof IQ PanOptix, ATLISA Tri 839MP, FineVision Micro F) and one EDOF lens (TECNIS Symfony ZXR00) were evaluated. The studies took place in Europe and North America. Follow-up ranged from three to six months. Of the 239 enroled participants, 233 (466 eyes) completed follow-up and were included in the analyses. The mean age of participants was 68.2 years, and 64% of participants were female. In general, the risk of bias in the studies was unclear as methods for random sequence generation and allocation concealment were poorly reported, and we judged one study to be at high risk of performance and detection bias. We assessed the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes as low, downgrading for the risk of bias and for imprecision. In two studies involving a total of 254 people, there was little or no difference between trifocal and EDOF lenses for uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity worse than 6/6. Sixty per cent of participants in both groups had uncorrected distance visual acuity worse than 6/6 (risk ratio (RR) 1.06, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.88 to 1.27). Thirty-one per cent of the trifocal group and 38% of the EDOF group had corrected distance visual acuity worse than 6/6 (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.39). In one study of 60 people, there were fewer cases of uncorrected near visual acuity worse than J2 in the trifocal group (3%) compared with the EDOF group (30%) (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.65). In two studies, participants were asked about spectacle independence using subjective questionnaires. There was no evidence of either lens type being superior. One further study of 60 participants reported, "overall, 90% of patients achieved spectacle independence", but did not categorise this by lens type. All studies included postoperative patient-reported visual function, which was measured using different questionnaires. Irrespective of the questionnaire used, both types of lenses scored well, and there was little evidence of any important differences between them. Two studies included patient-reported ocular aberrations (glare and halos). The outcomes were reported in different ways and could not be pooled; individually, these studies were too small to detect meaningful differences in glare and halos between groups. One study reported no surgical complications. Three studies did not mention surgical complications. One study reported YAG capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification (PCO) in one participant (one eye) in each group. One study reported no PCO. Two studies did not report PCO. One study reported that three participants (one trifocal and two EDOF) underwent laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) to correct residual myopic refractive error or astigmatism. One study reported a subset of participants who were considering laser enhancement at the end of the study period (nine trifocal and two EDOF). Two studies did not report laser enhancement rates. No economic evaluation studies were identified for inclusion in this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Distance visual acuity after cataract surgery may be similar whether the lenses implanted are trifocal IOLs or EDOF (TECNIS Symfony) IOLs. People receiving trifocal IOLs may achieve better near vision and may be less dependent on spectacles for near vision. Both lenses were reported to have adverse subjective visual phenomena, such as glare and halos, with no meaningful difference detected between lenses.
Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Extracción de Catarata/métodos , Percepción de Profundidad , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Lentes Intraoculares , Lentes Intraoculares MultifocalesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of posterior keratometry (PK) on the accuracy of 10 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas using standard keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK). METHODS: This is a retrospective consecutive case-series study. The IOL power was calculated using K and TK measured by IOLMaster 700 in 6 new-generation formulas (Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) 2.0, RBF Calculator 3.0, Hoffer QST, Kane, and Ladas Super Formula) and 4 traditional formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T). The arithmetic prediction error (PE) and mean absolute PE (MAE) were evaluated. The locally-weighted scatterplot smoothing was performed to assess the relationship between PE and PK. RESULTS: A total of 576 patients (576 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery were included. Compared with using K, all formulas using TK showed a hyperopic shift in the whole group. Specifically, for eyes with PK exceeding -5.90 D, all formulas using TK exhibited a hyperopic shift (all P < 0.001), while eyes with PK less than -5.90 D showed a myopic shift (all P < 0.001). The MAE of new-generation formulas calculated with TK and K showed no statistical differences, while the MAE of traditional formulas with TK was larger (TK: 0.34 ~ 0.43 D; K: 0.33 ~ 0.42 D, all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prediction bias of formulas with TK increased as PK deviated from -5.90 D. TK did not improve the prediction accuracy of new-generation formulas, and even performed worse in traditional formulas.
Asunto(s)
Biometría , Córnea , Lentes Intraoculares , Óptica y Fotónica , Refracción Ocular , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Femenino , Masculino , Biometría/métodos , Anciano , Córnea/diagnóstico por imagen , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Facoemulsificación/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Seguimiento , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of the Barrett II universal (BU II) formula, Hoffer-Q, and SRKT formulae following lensectomy and IOL implantation in a large pediatric cohort. METHODS: Retrospective study of children who underwent lensectomy and IOL implantation between 2015 and 2023 at Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one eyes of 104 children aged 6.0 ± 3.9 years were included. The mean prediction error (PE) was - 0.08 ± 1.54 diopters (D) with BU II, 0.24 ± 1.46 D with Hoffer-Q, and 0.71 ± 1.92 D with SRKT (P = 0.10). In eyes with axial length (AL) < 22 mm, BU II and Hoffer-Q had a smaller PE than SRKT (P = 0.024). In eyes with AL ≥ 22 mm, BU II had a smaller PE than Hoffer-Q (P = 0.048). In children 24 months or older at surgery, BU II had a smaller PE than SRKT and Hoffer-Q (P = 0.012). However, in younger children, no difference was found between the formulae (P = 0.61). For mean k-values ≥ 44.5 D, BU II and Hoffer-Q had a smaller PE than SRKT (P = 0.002). An absolute prediction error < 1.0 D was obtained with BU II in 66% of eyes and SRKT in 35% (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The BU II formula performed well with a small prediction error. No significant difference in PE was detected overall between the formulae. However, only BU II demonstrated a stable prediction error at varying axial lengths, K-readings, and ages. As the biometric parameters of the developing eye change with growth, the BU II formula offers a reliable and stable option for pediatric IOL calculation.
Asunto(s)
Biometría , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Refracción Ocular , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Preescolar , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Biometría/métodos , Lentes Intraoculares , Errores de Refracción/fisiopatología , Errores de Refracción/diagnóstico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Lactante , Longitud Axial del Ojo/patología , Adolescente , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report the long-term clinical outcomes of transscleral four-point fixation of Akreos intraocular lens using a closed continuous-loop suture technique. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter, interventional case series. Primary outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, corneal endothelial cell density, and complications with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two eyes of 177 patients from two surgical hospital sites were identified. The mean best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.88 ± 0.74 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (Snellen 20/152) preoperatively to 0.42 ± 0.52 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (Snellen 20/53) postoperatively ( P < 0.001). The mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 17.51 ± 8.67 mmHg, and the mean postoperative intraocular pressure at final follow-up was 15.08 ± 4.18 mmHg ( P = 0.001). The mean corneal endothelial cell density significantly reduced from 2,259 ± 729 cells/mm 2 to 2077 ± 659 cells/mm 2 , representing a cell loss of 5.73% ( P < 0.001). The intraocular lens was fixed well during follow-up. There were no intraoperative complications noted. Postoperative complications included transient ocular hypertension in 15 eyes (7.81%), hypotony in two eyes (1.04%), retinal detachment in one eye (0.52%), and macular edema in one eye (0.52%). CONCLUSION: The transscleral four-point fixation Akreos intraocular lens using the closed continuous-loop suture technique was effective and safe with satisfactory visual acuity with a minimum of 1-year follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Presión Intraocular , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Esclerótica , Técnicas de Sutura , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Esclerótica/cirugía , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Presión Intraocular/fisiología , Lentes Intraoculares , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Endotelio Corneal/patología , Recuento de Células , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Tiempo , Suturas , Complicaciones PosoperatoriasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Retrospective cohort study of 561 adult patients undergoing secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation by vitreoretinal surgeons at a single institution from April 2015 to December 2020. METHODS: Patient historical factors, intraoperative/postoperative complications, and outcomes of IOL type (anterior chamber IOL versus scleral sutured IOL versus scleral fixated IOL versus. sulcus) were assessed. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative retinal tears and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Secondary outcomes were rates of intraoperative endolaser, intraoperative retinal tear, and further IOL surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of intraoperative retinal tears was 7.3% and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of intraoperative endolaser use were 17.5% among all techniques and not significantly different between techniques. Rates of postoperative retinal tear were low (0%-2.7%). Rates of postoperative rhegmatogenous retinal detachment were not significantly different between techniques (anterior chamber IOL 9/198 [4.5%], SFIOL 1/54 [1.9%], scleral sutured IOL 14/274 [5.1%], sulcus 2/35 [5.7%], total 26/561 [4.6%], P = 0.79). Rates of repeat IOL surgery trended higher in sulcus lenses (anterior chamber IOL 5/198 [2.5%], SFIOL 4/54 [7.4%], scleral sutured IOL 16/274 [5.8%], sulcus 5/35 [14.3%], total 30/561 [5.3%], P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative endolaser use and intraoperative retinal tear are not uncommon in secondary IOL surgery and underscore the importance of careful vitreoretinal management among these patients.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Desprendimiento de Retina , Agudeza Visual , Vitrectomía , Humanos , Vitrectomía/métodos , Vitrectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Perforaciones de la Retina/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Incidencia , Reoperación , Lentes Intraoculares/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) (Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 and Tecnis Eyhance Toric DIU) has been developed to enhance intermediate vision while avoiding the disadvantages of multifocal IOLs. Although many studies have demonstrated the improvement of intermediate visual acuity with enhanced monofocal IOLs, it is not known specifically for which patients these IOLs should be recommended or avoided. In this study, we aim to find out which ocular parameters affect vision performance and photic phenomenon of ICB00 or DIU at different distances. METHODS: Patients who underwent cataract surgery with ICB00 or DIU, performed by a single surgeon, were included. Before surgery, the patients' age, gender, axial length, anterior chamber depth, spherical aberration Z (4,0), vertical coma, horizontal coma, angle kappa (κ), angle alpha (α), and other ocular parameters were investigated. One month after surgery, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA at 40 cm), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA at 66 cm), uncorrected distance logMAR visual acuity (UDVA), IOL decentration, and quality of vision (QoV) questionnaires were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients (58 eyes) were included. The results of the univariate linear regression analyses showed a negative correlation between spherical aberration and logMAR UNVA and UIVA (p = 0.003, ß=-0.51 and p = 0.018, ß=-0.23, respectively) and a positive correlation between angle α and logMAR UIVA (p = 0.036, ß = 0.19). Deeper anterior chamber depth (ACD) was associated with poorer total QoV (p = 0.018, ß = 14.43), particularly in glare, halo, blur, and fluctuation perception. A higher degree of IOL decentration tended to decrease UNVA and UIVA (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.336 and r = 0.221, respectively); however, no significant effect was observed on UDVA (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: In enhanced monofocal IOLs, a higher level of spherical aberration is associated with better performance in UNVA and UIVA, whereas a larger angle α has a negative impact. A deeper ACD negatively affects the QoV.
Asunto(s)
Lentes Intraoculares , Facoemulsificación , Humanos , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Coma , Sensibilidad de Contraste , Visión Ocular , Diseño de Prótesis , Satisfacción del Paciente , Refracción OcularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intraocular lens (IOL) fixation is performed after intraoperative anterior or total vitrectomy. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative complications of these two techniques. METHODS: This retrospective study included 235 eyes that underwent intrascleral fixation surgery at our hospital between July 2014 and January 2021. The eyes were classified into the anterior vitrectomy group (A-vit group; 134 eyes) and the pars plana vitrectomy group (PPV group; 101 eyes). The age, preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, observation period, preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure, and the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: Intrascleral fixation was performed more frequently in the PPV group, and a significant difference was observed between the eyes with a history of vitrectomy and eyes with scleral buckles (p = 0.00041). In terms of the incidence of postoperative complications following intrascleral fixation, the incidence of low intraocular pressure postoperative was higher in the PPV group than that in the A-vit group, and a significant difference was observed between the two groups (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The visual outcome and complications following intrascleral fixation did not differ according to the extent of vitreous excision.
Asunto(s)
Lentes Intraoculares , Vitrectomía , Humanos , Vitrectomía/efectos adversos , Vitrectomía/métodos , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Agudeza Visual , Esclerótica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including standard monofocal, bifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF), and enhanced monofocal IOLs, post-cataract surgery through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant studies from the past 5 years. Parameters such as binocular visual acuities, spectacle independence, contrast sensitivity (CS), and optical quality were used to evaluate efficacy and safety. Data from the selected studies were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software. RESULTS: Twenty-eight Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comprising 2465 subjects were included. Trifocal IOLs exhibited superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) compared to monofocal IOLs (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.22). Both trifocal (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOLs group MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.21, -0.06) and EDOF IOLs (MD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.09) showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) than monofocal IOLs. Trifocal IOLs ranked highest in spectacle independence at various distances (AT LISAtri 839MP group: SUCRA 97.5% for distance, 80.7% for intermediate; AcrySof IQ PanOptix group: SUCRA 83.0% for near). CONCLUSIONS: For cataract patients who want to treat presbyopia, trifocal IOLs demonstrated better visual acuity and spectacle independence at near distances. Different types of trifocal IOL characteristics differ. EDOF and enhanced monofocal IOLs have improved visual quality at intermediate distances.Therefore, It is very important to select the appropriate IOLs based on the lens characteristics and patient needs.
Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata , Lentes Intraoculares , Presbiopía , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Presbiopía/cirugía , Presbiopía/fisiopatología , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Extracción de Catarata/métodos , Sensibilidad de Contraste/fisiología , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Diseño de Prótesis , Visión Binocular/fisiología , Refracción Ocular/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies on the factors affecting vault after posterior chamber phakic Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) have been carried out, but most of them are single-centered and subjective selections of parameters. The present study aimed to systematically analyze the factors for vault. METHODS: A systematic review of case series, case-control, and cohort studies derived from the articles published in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang and VIP, as well as ClinicalTrials, which were conducted to search for studies on factors of vault using four core terms: phakic intraocular lenses, vault, risk factor and observational study, from January 01, 1997, to February 20, 2023. The included studies were meta-analyzed quantitatively and described qualitatively. Subsequently, meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used. RESULTS: We identified 13 studies (1,607 subjects), and 14 factors were considered. Meta-analysis showed that anterior chamber depth (ACD), horizontal corneal white-to-white (hWTW), ICL-size, and age are dual effects of the abnormal vaults; anterior chamber volume (ACV) and lens thickness (LT) are a one-way effect; while axial length (AL), ICL- spherical equivalent (ICL-SE) and Km are insignificant. In addition, descriptive analysis of anterior chamber angle (ACA), horizontal sulcus to sulcus (hSTS), ciliary processes height (T value), crystalline lens rise (CLR), and gender showed that all factors except gender tend to have significant effects on vault. Sensitivity analysis showed stable combined results. Country and design respectively affect the heterogeneity in ACD and ICL-size at low vault, while design affects the heterogeneity in ACD at high vault. No publication bias exists. CONCLUSIONS: Vault after ICL is related to multiple factors, especially anterior segmental biologic parameters, and they are weighted differently. We hope to provide a reference for the selection and adjustment of ICL.
Asunto(s)
Cámara Anterior , Miopía , Lentes Intraoculares Fáquicas , Humanos , Miopía/cirugía , Miopía/fisiopatología , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Longitud Axial del Ojo/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The visual performance and the optical quality of a segmental refractive extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lens (IOL) were evaluated in a prospective, single-arm, single-center study. METHODS: A total of 20 patients (40 eyes) after bilateral implantation of the refractive segmental EDoF Acunex Vario AN6V were included. Assessment procedure: refraction outcome, monocular and binocular uncorrected (UCVA) and distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA), defocus curve, contrast sensitivity (CS), higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and patient satisfaction were evaluated 1 and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: At 3-month follow-up, mean spherical equivalent was - 0.23 ± 0.32 D. Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (VA) at distance, intermediate and near was - 0.08 ± 0.06 logMAR at 4 m, -0.03 ± 0.06 logMAR at 66 cm and 0.16 ± 0.06 logMAR at 40 cm, respectively. The binocular defocus curve showed a VA better than 0.20 logMAR over a range from + 1.50 to - 2.45 D. Contrast sensitivity aligned with monofocal lenses, highlighting the lens's clinical value. Aberrometry showed minimal changes in corneal aberrations. NEI-RQL-42-Questionnaire showed a high patient satisfaction for daily activities and revealed reduced dependence on glasses, particularly for near and intermediate vision. The Acunex Vario AN6V demonstrated minimal dysphotopsias, making it a promising option for those seeking spectacle independence. CONCLUSION: This segmental refractive EDoF IOL provides a high degree of spectacle independence for far and intermediate distances with functional near VA. Although inducing residual coma aberrations, it showed subjectively good results with little dysphotopsias. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was reviewed and approved by ethics committee of Charité University, Berlin, Germany, with approval number EA4/126/20.
Asunto(s)
Sensibilidad de Contraste , Lentes Intraoculares , Satisfacción del Paciente , Seudofaquia , Refracción Ocular , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Anciano , Sensibilidad de Contraste/fisiología , Seudofaquia/fisiopatología , Diseño de Prótesis , Facoemulsificación , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Percepción de Profundidad/fisiología , Visión Binocular/fisiología , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate short-term visual and refractive outcomes after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in cataract patients with phacoemulsification (PHACO) and femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Aier Eye Hospital, China. DESIGN: A retrospective, observational study. METHODS: Patients who underwent cataract surgery combined with Acrysoft IQ PanOptix trifocal IOL implantation were enrolled and divided into three groups: PHACO group, LAstig-FLACS group (astigmatism less then 1D) and HAstig-FLACS group (astigmatism more than 1D). Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity of uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), near visual (UNVA), defocus curve, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) were evaluated in 1 months postoperatively and wavefront aberrations were evaluated in 6 months. RESULTS: 101 eyes of 60 patients were included with 31 eyes in PHACO group, 45 eyes in LAstig-FLACS group and 25 eyes in HAstig-FLACS group. Significant difference was found of internal Strehl Ratio (SR) between PHACO and LAstig-FLACS group (P = 0.026). In PHACO group, 79.31%, 86.21%, 72.41% of eyes gain visual acuity LogMAR 0.1 or more in UDVA, UIVA and UNVA, while 83.72%, 93.02%, 93.02% of those in LAstig-FLACS group and 92.00%, 84.00%, 76.00% in HAstig-FLACS group. CONCLUSIONS: Panoptix diffractive trifocal IOL provides satisfied visual outcome in no matter FLACS or PHACO. Besides, trifocal IOL implantation via FLACS can provide a better accumulative visual acuity outcome at all distance than PHACO in 1 month. Femtosecond laser assisted limbal relaxing incisions (FLLRIs) is an excellent way to reduce a patient's corneal astigmatism.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Lentes Intraoculares Multifocales , Facoemulsificación , Refracción Ocular , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Facoemulsificación/métodos , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Anciano , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Seudofaquia/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Diseño de Prótesis , Extracción de Catarata/métodos , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the three-year visual, refractive outcomes and adverse events of the Eyecryl toric phakic IOL (pIOL) for moderate-to-high myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This retrospective study included eligible patients who underwent refractive surgery in one or both eyes with Eyecryl toric pIOL for myopic astigmatism. The efficacy, safety, predictability, rotational stability, vector analysis, and adverse events were evaluated in patients with spherical refraction from - 4.50 to -17.00 diopters (D) and cylindrical refraction from - 0.75 to -5.50 D. RESULTS: Fifty-two eyes of 28 patients were included in the study. The mean efficacy and safety index were 1.12 ± 0.35 and 1.38 ± 0.42, respectively. The mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was - 10.06 ± 2.69 D and - 0.64 ± 0.61 D preoperatively and postoperatively at 36 months, respectively. The mean manifest astigmatism was - 2.06 ± 1.16 D and - 0.44 ± 0.48 D preoperatively and 36 months postoperative, respectively. During the final examination, 70% of the eyes showed an increase in CDVA of one or more lines compared to their preoperative state. There was a cumulative endothelial cell loss of 3.1% at 36 months postoperatively. One eye developed visually significant anterior subcapsular opacity, whereas another eye experienced pIOL opacification. CONCLUSION: The Eyecryl toric pIOL demonstrated satisfactory visual acuity and refractive outcomes, as assessed by efficacy, safety and stability over a three-year period.
Asunto(s)
Astigmatismo , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Lentes Intraoculares Fáquicas , Refracción Ocular , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Astigmatismo/fisiopatología , Astigmatismo/cirugía , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Adulto , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Miopía/cirugía , Miopía/fisiopatología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adulto Joven , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of non-viscoelastic agent technique for EVO-ICL implantation. METHODS: A total of 181 myopia eyes that underwent non-toric ICL without viscoelastic agent through single incision from Beijing Tongren Hosipital were included. An analysis was conducted on the quantity of haptics that were initially implanted intraoperatively into the posterior chamber. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was evaluated at before and 2 h,24 h,1week,6month after surgery. Anterior chamber volume(ACV), anterior chamber depth(ACD), anterior chamber angle(ACA), pupil diameter(PD) and corneal densitometry density (ECD) were evaluated at before and 24 h postoperatively. Refractive outcomes were investigated at before, 24 h ,7 days and 6months. Vault was evaluated at 24 h ,7 days and 6months. RESULTS: The efficacy and safety indices were 1.30 ± 0.32 and 1.31 ± 0.32, respectively. Of 181 eyes, 99 eyes received 4 haptics on the first attempt without any adjustment, and 72 eyes received lens alignment without an viscoelastic agent. The success rate of the viscoelastic agent free procedure was 94.5%. Two hours postoperatively, IOP was 17.41 ± 3.77 mmHg, which was significantly higher than baseline value (t = 8.930, P < 0.000), however there was no significant difference between preoperative IOP and IOP at 1 day ,1 week and 6 months postoperatively. The ECD changed from 2895.52 ± 253.73 cells/mm2 preoperatively to 2873.66 ± 244.17 cells/mm2 at 1 day and 2882.63 ± 239.97 postoperatively, and the difference was not statistically significant (t = 1.811, P = 0.072). The ACA was narrowed by 42% on the first day. CONCLUSION: The pure viscoelastic agent free technique is an efficient and safe way for ICL implantation. It can be a safer method of ICL implantation because of it reduces the risk of complications associated with ocular hypertension at the early postoperative stages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000036335) at August 20, 2020.
Asunto(s)
Presión Intraocular , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Miopía , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Presión Intraocular/fisiología , Adulto Joven , Miopía/cirugía , Miopía/fisiopatología , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sustancias Viscoelásticas/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Lentes Intraoculares , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Accurate prediction of postoperative vault in implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation is crucial; however, current formulas often fail to account for individual anatomical variations, leading to suboptimal visual outcomes and necessitating improved predictive models. We aimed to verify the prediction accuracy of our new predictive model for vaulting based on anterior and posterior chamber structural parameters. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 137 patients (240 eyes) who previously underwent ICL surgery. Patients were randomly divided into the model establishment (192 eyes) or validation (48 eyes) groups. Preoperative measurements of the anterior and posterior chamber structures were obtained using Pentacam, CASIA2 anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), ultrasound biomicroscopy, and other devices. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the vault and each variable (WL formula). The Friedman test was performed for the vaulting prediction results of the WL, NK (Ver. 3), and KS formulas (Ver. 4) in CASIA2 AS-OCT, as well as the Zhu formula and vault measurements. The proportions of prediction error within ± 250 µm per formula were compared. RESULTS: The predicted vault values of the WL, NK, KS, and Zhu formulas and vault measurements were 668.74 ± 162.12, 650.85 ± 248.47, 546.56 ± 128.99, 486.56 ± 210.76, and 716.06 ± 233.84 µm, respectively, with a significant difference (χ2 = 69.883, P = 0.000). Significant differences were also found between the measured vault value and Zhu formula, measured vault value and KS formula, WL formula and Zhu formula, WL formula and KS formula, NK formula and KS formula, and NK formula and Zhu formula (P < 0.001) but not between other groups. The proportions of prediction error within ± 250 µm per formula were as follows: WL formula (81.3%) > NK formula (70.8%) > KS formula (66.7%) > Zhu formula (54.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The WL formula, which considers the complexity of the anterior and posterior chamber structures, demonstrates greater calculation accuracy, compared with the KS (Ver. 4) and Zhu formulas. The proportion of absolute prediction error ≤ 250 µm is higher with the WL formula than with the NK formula (ver. 3). This enhanced predictive capability can improve ICL sizing decisions, thereby increasing the safety and efficacy of ICL implantation surgeries.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Adulto , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Cámara Anterior/diagnóstico por imagen , Lentes Intraoculares Fáquicas , Miopía/cirugía , Microscopía Acústica/métodos , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Agudeza Visual , Biometría/métodos , Refracción Ocular/fisiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: To explore the application and long-term clinical effects of modified Yamane technique in intrascleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation combined with or without iris reconstruction. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The data of patients receiving IOL fixation with modified Yamane technique in an ophthalmology department between December 2021 and August 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. The longest follow-up duration was > 12 months. METHODS AND MATERIAL: The trailing haptic was fixed with the needle before the leading haptic. The silicone haptic stoppers were used to stabilize the IOL when iris reconstruction was combined. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal endothelial cells (CECs), postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), surgical indications and methods, and postoperative complications were recorded. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to evaluate IOL decentration and tilt. The paired sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare the results of the same index before and after the operation. RESULTS: Twelve patients (12 eyes) were included in this cohort. There were 1 case of IOL dislocation, eight cases of lens dislocation or subluxation, and three cases of aphakia. Traumatic lens dislocation was the main cause of aphakia. Primary lens extraction was performed in previous surgeries, and all three were combined with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Four of 12 patients underwent IOL fixation and iris reconstruction. The mean age of participants was 63 ± 10.61 years. The mean BCVA increased from 0.89 ± 0.72 logMAR to 0.39 ± 0.56 logMAR at the last visit (p < 0.05). The postoperative relative refractive error was - 0.13 ± 0.42 D (-0.60 D to + 0.57 D). The OCT showed that the IOLs were well centered, with a mean decentration of 0.20 ± 0.13 mm and a mean tilt of 2.31°±0.93°. Ten patients did not experience any complications. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Yamane technique in IOL fixation surgery, especially combined with iris reconstruction, reduces operation difficulty, increases operational stability and safety, and improves postoperative visual acuity without serious intra- or postoperative complications. The long-term improvement effect was remarkable.
Asunto(s)
Iris , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Lentes Intraoculares , Esclerótica , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Iris/cirugía , Anciano , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Esclerótica/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to assess visual outcomes, complications, intraocular lens (IOL) stability, and corneal status after sutured scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation combined with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). METHODS: This retrospective single-arm cohort study included patients who underwent PKP and sutured scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation between 2013 and 2018 at the Dhahran Eye Specialty Hospital. The eyes were examined postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Corneal status, complications, and IOL status were also evaluated periodically, and the number of eyes with a BCVA of > 20/200 was recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes from 22 patients were included. The median duration of follow-up was 3 (IQR 1.8; 4.4) years. Reasons for surgery were traumatic globe rupture (six eyes, 27.3%), bullous keratopathy (nine eyes, 40.1%), failed previous graft (five eyes, 22.7%), and corneal scarring (two eyes, 9.1%). Twelve (54.5%) eyes showed a BCVA of > 20/200 (non-blind) at 12 months after surgery and only five (22.7%) before surgery. Twelve months after surgery, 13 patients showed an improvement in BCVA in two lines (59.1%), seven remained the same (31.8%), and 2 deteriorated (9.1%). The indication for surgery (p = 0.2) and the stability of the sutured-scleral fixated IOL (p = 0.8) were not associated with an improvement in BCVA at the final follow-up. The corneal graft remained clear in nine eyes (40.9%) at a median duration of 3 years. The overall average survival period for all corneal grafts was 42.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of sutured scleral-fixated intraocular lens implants and PKP is an effective intervention for preserving visual acuity in patients with complex cases. However, the risk of graft failure and then need for repeat transplantation should be taken into consideration.
Asunto(s)
Queratoplastia Penetrante , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares , Esclerótica , Técnicas de Sutura , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Queratoplastia Penetrante/métodos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Implantación de Lentes Intraoculares/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerótica/cirugía , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedades de la Córnea/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lentes Intraoculares , Complicaciones PosoperatoriasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Addressing presbyopia in the aging population, particularly in non-cataractous patients, remains a challenge. This study evaluates the outcomes of refractive lens exchange (RLE) with AT LISA tri 839MP trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a Chinese presbyopic population without cataracts. METHODS: The study included 164 eyes from 82 patients undergoing bilateral RLE at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Comprehensive evaluations encompassed visual acuities, refraction, ocular aberrometry, and subjective outcomes via the VF-14 questionnaire. The focus was on postoperative visual performance, refractive outcomes, safety, objective optical quality, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: 100%, 90.2%, and 89.0% of patients achieved binocular UDVA, UNVA, and UIVA of logMAR 0.1 or better at 6 months postoperatively. 97.6% of eyes were within ± 1.00 D of emmetropia postoperatively. Optical quality assessments showed increases in modulation transfer function and Strehl ratios (p < 0.05). High-order aberrations decreased significantly (p < 0.05). Despite the high incidence of posterior capsule opacification (83.2%), managed with early Nd: YAG capsulotomy, no other severe complications were reported. Patient-reported outcomes indicated high satisfaction, with an average VF-14 score of 94.3 ± 10.2 and 93.5% achieving complete spectacle independence. Halo (66.2%) was the most commonly reported optical phenomena, followed by glare (18.2%), and starburst (7.8%) after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral RLE with trifocal IOLs in presbyopic patients without cataracts significantly improves visual acuity and reduces ocular aberrations in presbyopic patients. The procedure offers high patient satisfaction and spectacle independence, though it requires careful patient selection and management of expectations regarding potential photic phenomena.