Evaluation and Comparison of the Effectiveness of Atropine Eye Drops, Ipratropium Bromide Nasal Spray, and Amitriptyline Tablet in the Management of Clozapine-Associated Sialorrhea in Patients With Refractory Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Clozapine, a second-generation antipsychotic medication, is mainly indicated for managing treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Among all the nonthreatening adverse effects of clozapine, sialorrhea is a stigmatizing complication occurring in approximately 31.0% to 97.4% of patients. In this study, 2 topical agents (atropine eye drop and ipratropium nasal spray) and a systemic medication (amitriptyline) were compared simultaneously for the management of clozapine-associated sialorrhea. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, single-blinded, non-placebo-controlled clinical trial from June 2022 to January 2023. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into 3 mentioned groups. Patients were monitored for sialorrhea weekly based on scales, including the Toronto Nocturnal Hypersalivation Scale, Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity for 1 month. Possible adverse drug reactions and adherence were also recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients, including 6, 10, and 8 individuals in ipratropium bromide nasal spray, atropine eye drop, and amitriptyline groups, completed the study, respectively. The cohort's demographic, baseline clinical, and sociocultural characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups. Within-group comparisons, between times baseline and week 4, demonstrated that significant differences were in groups atropine and amitriptyline based on Toronto Nocturnal Hypersalivation Scale, in 3 groups based on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, and also in only-atropine group based on Clinical Global Impression-Severity. Likewise, between-group comparisons showed that atropine was significantly more effective in clozapine-associated sialorrhea management than amitriptyline and ipratropium, in the first 2 weeks and second 2 weeks of study, respectively. Regarding safety, the interventions were tolerated relatively well. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusively, atropine is more efficacious than amitriptyline, within the first 2 weeks of study and also relative to ipratropium, overall. As time effect was significant between atropine and amitriptyline, according to analysis of covariance test, further investigation with longer follow-up duration would be prudent. In addition, expanding patient population with larger sample size should be conducted for more precision.

Pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic-related sialorrhea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Antipsychotic-induced sialorrhea carries a significant burden, but evidence-based treatment guidance is incomplete, warranting network meta-analysis (NMA) of pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic-related sialorrhea. PubMed Central/PsycInfo/Cochrane Central database/Clinicaltrials.gov/WHO-ICTRP and the Chinese Electronic Journal Database (Qikan.cqvip.com) were searched for published/unpublished RCTs of antipsychotic-induced sialorrhea (any definition) in adults, up to 06/12/2023. We assessed global/local inconsistencies, publication bias, risk of bias (RoB2), and confidence in the evidence, conducting subgroup/sensitivity analyses. Co-primary efficacy outcomes were changes in saliva production (standardized mean difference/SMD) and study-defined response (risk ratios/RRs). The acceptability outcome was all-cause discontinuation (RR). Primary nodes were molecules; the mechanism of action (MoA) was secondary. Thirty-four RCTs entered a systematic review, 33 NMA (n = 1958). All interventions were for clozapine-induced sialorrhea in subjects with mental disorders. Regarding individual agents and response, metoclopramide (RR = 3.11, 95% C.I. = 1.39-6.98), cyproheptadine, (RR = 2.76, 95% C.I. = 2.00-3.82), sulpiride (RR = 2.49, 95% C.I. = 1.65-3.77), propantheline (RR = 2.39, 95% C.I. = 1.97-2.90), diphenhydramine (RR = 2.32, 95% C.I. = 1.88-2.86), benzhexol (RR = 2.32, 95% C.I. = 1.59-3.38), doxepin (RR = 2.30, 95% C.I. = 1.85-2.88), amisulpride (RR = 2.23, 95% C.I. = 1.30-3.81), chlorpheniramine (RR = 2.20, 95% C.I. = 1.67-2.89), amitriptyline (RR = 2.09, 95% C.I. = 1.34-3.26), atropine, (RR = 2.03, 95% C.I. = 1.22-3.38), and astemizole, (RR = 1.70, 95% C.I. = 1.28-2.26) outperformed placebo, but not glycopyrrolate or ipratropium. Across secondary nodes (k = 28, n = 1821), antimuscarinics (RR = 2.26, 95% C.I. = 1.91-2.68), benzamides (RR = 2.23, 95% C.I. = 1.75-3.10), TCAs (RR = 2.23, 95% C.I. = 1.83-2.72), and antihistamines (RR = 2.18, 95% C.I. = 1.83-2.59) outperformed placebo. In head-to-head comparisons, astemizole and ipratropium were outperformed by several interventions. All secondary nodes, except benzamides, outperformed the placebo on the continuous efficacy outcome. For nocturnal sialorrhea, neither benzamides nor atropine outperformed the placebo. Active interventions did not differ significantly from placebo regarding constipation or sleepiness/drowsiness. Low-confidence findings prompt caution in the interpretation of the results. Considering primary nodes' co-primary efficacy outcomes and head-to-head comparisons, efficacy for sialorrhea is most consistent for the following agents, decreasing from metoclopramide through cyproheptadine, sulpiride, propantheline, diphenhydramine, benzhexol, doxepin, amisulpride, chlorpheniramine, to amitriptyline, and atropine (the latter not for nocturnal sialorrhea). Shared decision-making with the patient should guide treatment decisions regarding clozapine-related sialorrhea.

Adherence to the asthma pathway, including pre-triage bronchodilator history, reduces hospitalizations.

Objective: To determine if adherence to an asthma treatment pathway is associated with a decrease in hospitalizations.Methods: A prospective cohort design was conducted of Thai children aged 2-15 years who visited the emergency department with severe asthma exacerbations, defined as a Buddhasothorn Asthma Severity Score ≥ 8. Patients who received systemic corticosteroids and nebulized short-acting beta-2 agonists combined with ipratropium bromides were classified as the adherence group. The timing of steroid and bronchodilator administration, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization rate were examined in relation to adherence to the asthma pathway. Multivariable logistic regression models and adjusted odds ratios were used to assess associations.Results: A total of 118 episodes of asthma exacerbations (EAEs) from 59 participants were included. Patients who adhered to the pathway had a significantly higher rate of systemic corticosteroid administration within 1 h of arrival at triage (88.6% vs. 41.9%, adjusted Odds Ratio: aOR 10.21; 95%CI 3.52-29.62). A higher proportion of the patients who adhered to the pathway also received inhaled ipratropium bromide ≥ 2 doses within 1 h of arrival at triage (72.7% vs. 12.2%, aOR 23.51; 95%CI 7.73-71.54) and it was administered significantly faster by 31 min (5 min vs. 36 min, p < 0.001) compared to non-adherence group. The hospitalization rate was significantly lower by almost half of EAEs for adherence group (36.4% vs. 63.5%, aOR 0.41; 95%CI 0.18-0.93).Conclusions: Accurate assessment of severity and adherence to the clinical pathway can reduce hospitalization in pediatric patients with severe asthma exacerbations.

Effectiveness of antitussives, anticholinergics, and honey versus usual care in adults with uncomplicated acute bronchitis: a multiarm randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the frequent use of symptomatic therapies in cough, evidence of their benefits is lacking. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effectiveness of 3 symptomatic therapies and usual care in acute bronchitis. METHODS: Multicenter, pragmatic, multiarm parallel group, open randomized trial in primary care (ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03738917) was conducted in Catalonia. Patients ≥18 with uncomplicated acute bronchitis, with cough<3 weeks as the main symptom, scoring ≥4 in either daytime or nocturnal cough (7-point Likert scale), were randomized to usual care, dextromethorphan 15 mg t.i.d., ipratropium bromide inhaler 20 µg 2 puffs t.i.d, or 30 mg of honey t.i.d., all taken for up to 14 days. The main outcome measure was the number of days with moderate-to-severe cough. A symptom diary was given. A second visit was scheduled at days 2-3 for assessing evolution, with 2 more visits at days 15 and 29 for clinical assessment, evaluation of adverse effects, re-attendance, and complications. RESULTS: We failed to achieve the sample size scheduled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We finally recruited 194 patients. The median number of days with moderate-to-severe cough (score ≥ 3) in the usual care arm was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 4, 8.75), 5 in the ipratropium bromide arm (IQR, 3, 8), 5 in the dextromethorphan arm (IQR, 4, 9.75), and 6 in the honey arm (IQR, 3.5, 7). The same results were obtained in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the median survival time of each arm with the usual care as the reference group. CONCLUSION: The symptomatic treatment evaluated has shown to be ineffective against cough.

Cough is the most frequent symptom reported by patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Despite being a defense mechanism, cough is unpleasant and negatively affects sleep and overall well-being. Accordingly, many patients with acute cough seek medical help to mitigate symptoms and reduce their duration despite the typically self-limiting nature of the condition. In this randomized clinical trial, we explored the benefit of 3 common symptomatic treatments recommended in some guidelines for relieving this symptom during the course of uncomplicated acute bronchitis, a cough suppressant, an inhaler, and honey intake. Although the total number of patients initially expected could not be achieved due to the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the results of our study demonstrate a lack of efficacy of these products as the number of days of severe-to-moderate cough was similar in the 3 arms and comparable to the group of patients allocated to usual care.

Quality of acute asthma care: an audit of clinical practice in a Victorian health service.

BACKGROUND: Gaps in the treatment of patients with acute asthma have been repeatedly described in Australia. We conducted a retrospective audit of acute asthma care at a Victorian tertiary institution. AIMS: To describe acute asthma care at a large health network in metropolitan Melbourne, and evaluate the extent to which Emergency Department (ED) care was consistent with National Asthma Council guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective audit was performed of medical records between July 2017 and June 2019. We included adult patients admitted to campuses within the Western Health network in Melbourne, Victoria, where the length of stay was at least 12 h, and the primary discharge diagnosis was asthma. RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety-three admissions were included in the analysis, representing 392 individual patients. Seventy-one percent of patients were female and 27% were current smokers. Ninety-six percent of patients had a prior asthma diagnosis, 63% had a previous hospital presentation and 75% were prescribed an inhaled preventer. In the ED, systemic corticosteroids and inhaled salbutamol were prescribed in 65% and 82% admissions respectively; adjunctive treatments included ipratropium (67% of admissions), magnesium sulfate (30%), adrenaline (11%) and non-invasive ventilation (9%). Overall, ED care was guideline concordant in 59% of admissions. On the wards, treatments prescribed within 24 h of admission included corticosteroids (90% of admissions), salbutamol (84%), ipratropium (64%) and inhaled preventers (63%). The proportion of patients prescribed these treatments, as well as documented follow up (e.g. asthma action plans), varied significantly depending on the treating specialty. CONCLUSION: The emergency treatment of patients with acute asthma frequently deviated from guidelines and there was significant variation in inpatient treatment. Quality improvement initiatives that incorporate structural changes are required to improve asthma care.

Development of a rapid and validated stability-indicating UPLC-PDA method for concurrent quantification of impurity profiling and an assay of ipratropium bromide and salbutamol sulfate in inhalation dosage form.

The objective of the proposed work was to develop a rapid and new reverse phase ultra-performance liquid chromatographic (RP-UPLC) method for the simultaneous quantification of related impurities of ipratropium bromide and salbutamol sulfate in the combined inhalation dosage form. Herein, the chromatographic separation was achieved on Acquity BEH C18 (100mm×2.1mm, 1.7µm) column by following gradient elution of solvent A as 2mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate with 0.025% of 1-pentane sulphonic acid sodium salt (pH 3.0 buffer) and solvent B as pH 3.0 buffer, acetonitrile and methanol in the ratio of (32:50:18, v/v/v) at a flow rate of 0.3mL/min. The samples were detected and quantified at 220nm. To prove the stability-indicating potential of the method, forced degradation studies were performed using acidic, basic, oxidative, thermal, and photolytic conditions. After sufficient exposure, the resultant solutions were injected and found that all degradants and impurities formed during stress studies were well separated from each other and from the main peak compounds. The performance of the method was validated according to the present ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines. The method has good linearity (r≥0.999) and consistent recoveries were obtained with a range of 91.3-108.8% for all compounds. The % RSD obtained for the precision experiments was less than 5% and also there is a good sensitivity (LOQ≤0.5µg/mL) for all compounds. The intended method proved its applicability and that it can be beneficial to pharmaceutical industries for quick quantification of related impurities and assay in quality control department for analysis of ipratropium bromide and salbutamol sulfate inhalation dosage form.

Sudden anisocoria in a healing pediatric multitrauma patient.

ABSTRACT: This article describes a teenager who developed anisocoria with no obvious neurologic deficits or decline after a motor vehicle accident. The condition resolved over several hours before reappearing in the opposite eye 2 days later. Again no clinical neurologic deficits were noted and the condition resolved after several hours. The patient's asymptomatic anisocoria was finally determined to be secondary to aerosolized ipratropium treatments and an ill-fitting mask.

Magnesium sulfate for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic and progressive disease, often punctuated by recurrent flare-ups or exacerbations. Magnesium sulfate, having a bronchodilatory effect, may have a potential role as an adjunct treatment in COPD exacerbations. However, comprehensive evidence of its effects is required to facilitate clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of magnesium sulfate for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) trials portal, EU Clinical Trials Register and Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials. We also searched the proceedings of major respiratory conferences and reference lists of included studies up to 2 August 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included single- or double-blind parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing magnesium sulfate in adults with COPD exacerbations. We excluded cross-over trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes were: hospital admissions (from the emergency room); need for non-invasive ventilation (NIV), assisted ventilation or admission to intensive-care unit (ICU); and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were: length of hospital stay, mortality, adverse events, dyspnoea score, lung function and blood gas measurements. We assessed confidence in the evidence using GRADE methodology. For missing data, we contacted the study investigators. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 11 RCTs (10 double-blind and 1 single-blind) with a total 762 participants. The mean age of participants ranged from 62 to 76 years. Trials were single- or two-centre trials conducted in Iran, New Zealand, Nepal, Turkey, the UK, Tunisia and the USA between 2004 and 2018. We judged studies to be at low or unclear risk of bias for most of the domains. Three studies were at high risk for blinding and other biases.  Intravenous magnesium sulfate versus placebo Seven studies (24 to 77 participants) were included. Fewer people may require hospital admission with magnesium infusion compared to placebo (odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.88; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 7; 3 studies, 170 participants; low-certainty evidence). Intravenous magnesium may result in little to no difference in the requirement for non-invasive ventilation (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.75; very low-certainty evidence). There were no reported cases of endotracheal intubation (2 studies, 107 participants) or serious adverse events (1 study, 77 participants) in either group. Included studies did not report intensive care unit (ICU) admission or deaths. Magnesium infusion may reduce the length of hospital stay by a mean difference (MD) of 2.7 days (95% CI 4.73 days to 0.66 days; 2 studies, 54 participants; low-certainty evidence) and improve dyspnoea score by a standardised mean difference of -1.40 (95% CI -1.83 to -0.96; 2 studies, 101 participants; low-certainty evidence). We were uncertain about the effect of magnesium infusion on improving lung function or oxygen saturation. For all adverse events, the Peto OR was 0.14 (95% CI 0.02 to 1.00; 102 participants); however, the event rate was too low to reach a robust conclusion.  Nebulised magnesium sulfate versus placebo Three studies (20 to 172 participants) were included. Magnesium inhalation may have little to no impact on hospital admission (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.21 to 2.82; very low-certainty evidence) or need for ventilatory support (NIV or mechanical ventilation) (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.20; very low-certainty evidence). It may result in fewer ICU admissions compared to placebo (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.00; very low-certainty evidence) and improvement in dyspnoea (MD -14.37, 95% CI -26.00 to -2.74; 1 study, 20 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There were no serious adverse events reported in either group. There was one reported death in the placebo arm in one trial, but the number of participants was too small for a conclusion. There was limited evidence about the effect of magnesium inhalation on length of hospital stay, lung function outcomes or oxygen saturation. Included studies did not report adverse events.  Magnesium sulfate versus ipratropium bromide  A single study with 124 participants assessed nebulised magnesium sulfate plus intravenous magnesium infusion versus nebulised ipratropium plus intravenous normal saline. There was little to no difference between these groups in terms of hospital admission (OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.78 to 3.37), endotracheal intubation (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 4.71) and length of hospital stay (MD 1.10 days, 95% CI -0.22 to 2.42), all with very low-certainty evidence. There were no data available for non-invasive ventilation, ICU admission and serious adverse events. Adverse events were not reported.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous magnesium sulfate may be associated with fewer hospital admissions, reduced length of hospital stay and improved dyspnoea scores compared to placebo. There is no evidence of a difference between magnesium infusion and placebo for NIV, lung function, oxygen saturation or adverse events. We found no evidence for ICU admission, endotracheal intubation, serious adverse events or mortality. For nebulised magnesium sulfate, we are unable to draw conclusions about its effects in COPD exacerbations for most of the outcomes. Studies reported possibly lower ICU admissions and a lesser degree of dyspnoea with magnesium inhalation compared to placebo; however, larger studies are required to yield a more precise estimate for these outcomes. Similarly, we could not identify any robust evidence for magnesium sulfate compared to ipratropium bromide. Future well-designed multicentre trials with larger samples are required, including subgroups according to severity of exacerbations and COPD phenotypes.

Comparison efficacy of randomized nebulized magnesium sulfate and ipratropium bromide/fenoterol in children with moderate to severe asthma exacerbation.

BACKGROUND: In Thailand, nebulized ipratropium bromide/fenoterol, is commonly used in addition to salbutamol for severe asthma exacerbation. Recently, nebulized MgSO4 is indicated in GINA 2015 as an additive treatment for severe cases. However, there is limited data showed the efficacy of both drugs in childhood severe asthma. The purpose of this study to compare efficacy and safety of nebulized MgSO4 and ipratropium bromide/fenoterol in moderate to severe asthma attacks. METHODS: In this a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial study, we enrolled thirty-three children, age ranged from 2 to 15 years old, with PRAM score ≥ 4 (moderate to severe asthma exacerbation) despite 3 doses of nebulized salbutamol. Each patient was randomized to receive either three doses of nebulized MgSO4 or nebulized ipratropium bromide/fenoterol every 30 minutes. The PRAM score was measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 240 minutes after the treatment. The adverse event and admission days were also evaluated. RESULTS: Sixteen patients received nebulized MgSO4 and seventeen received nebulized ipratropium bromide/fenoterol. Almost patients were classified as having moderate asthmatic attack. There were no statistically significant difference between the two study groups in almost baseline characteristic, PRAM score at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 240 minutes. The hospital length of stay was also similar between two groups (p = 0.83). There were no serious events in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our double blind, randomized, controlled pilot study demonstrated non-inferior outcomes including clinical benefit and safety of nebulized MgSO4 and nebulized ipratropium bromide/fenoterol among Thai children with acute moderate asthmatic.

Case report: Paradoxical responses to short acting beta-agonists in a pediatric patient.

Introduction: Asthma is one of the most common airway diseases that nearly all pediatricians will encounter in their clinical practice. Using spirometry to compare a patient's forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) both pre- and post-bronchodilator administration is the ideal way to document a paradoxical bronchodilator response.Case Study: Here, we present a patient who experienced paradoxical responses to short acting beta-2 agonists (SABAs; albuterol and levalbuterol).Results: This patient responded to an anti-cholinergic agent (ipratropium bromide) with both subjective as well as objective response.Conclusion: This case highlights the need to include paradoxical response to SABAs in the differential of a patient with poorly controlled asthma. It also provides an example of successful treatment of a pediatric patient with a class of medications previously reserved for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Reversible Mydriasis of Sudden Onset: Think Before You Act.

BACKGROUND: The presence of abrupt anisocoria in clinical examination usually leads to the performance of urgent neuroimaging studies to exclude intracranial hemorrhage, although unilateral mydriasis might be the result of other benign etiologies. CASE REPORT: In this work, we report an illustrative case of a patient presenting with sudden-onset anisocoria while receiving ipratropium bromide nebulization in the emergency department to treat acute asthma. No other abnormalities were found on neurological examination and the computed tomography scan was normal. As a muscarinic antagonist, ipratropium bromide can produce mydriasis if accidentally instilled on one eye, thus leading to the suspicion of pharmacologic mydriasis. The pupils became isocoric after the discontinuation of the drug. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: A careful neurological examination and the history of treatment with mydriatic drugs might avoid unnecessary tests and radiation exposure.

A Statewide Study of the Epidemiology of Emergency Medical Services' Management of Pediatric Asthma.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about emergency medical services' (EMS') management of pediatric asthma. This study's objective was to describe the demographic, clinical, and geographic characteristics of current EMS' management of pediatric asthma in the state with the fourth-largest pediatric population. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of EMS patients ages 2 to 18 years with an asthma exacerbation from 2011 to 2016. Patients from Florida's EMS Tracking and Reporting System were included if their EMS chief complaint indicated respiratory distress, if they received at least 1 albuterol treatment, and if they were transported to a hospital. RESULTS: A total of 11,226 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 9 years, and 49% were African-American. Geospatial analysis revealed 4 rural counties with disproportionate numbers of African-American patients. In addition to albuterol, 37% of patients received ipratropium bromide and 9% received systemic corticosteroids. Adjusted logistic regression revealed that the strongest predictors of receiving systemic corticosteroids from EMS were intravenous access (odds ratio, 33.4; 95% confidence interval, 24.4-45.6) and intravenous magnesium sulfate administration (odds ratio, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-7.3), indicating a more severe presentation. CONCLUSIONS: This statewide study demonstrated low rates of EMS administration of ipratropium bromide and systemic corticosteroids, both evidence-based treatments for asthma exacerbations. Targeted EMS education should attempt to increase utilization of both those medications. In addition, the feasibility and efficacy of EMS administration of oral systemic corticosteroids for children should be explored.

Metered-dose inhaler ipratropium bromide for children with acute asthma exacerbation: A prospective, non-randomized, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Ipratropium bromide (IB), when administered with ß2-agonists, is effective in reducing hospital admissions of children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with severe asthma. While IB is commonly delivered in its nebulized form, using a metered-dose inhaler (MDI), can, reportedly, shorten patients' length of stay in the ED. However, the effectiveness and safety of IB administration using an MDI with a spacer have not been established. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of MDI-delivered IB in pediatric patients with acute asthma exacerbation. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized, observational study included patients aged ≥4 years with a history of severe asthma exacerbation. Patients received IB via MDI with a spacer three times at 20-min intervals. IB use was determined by the physicians' treatment policy. Propensity score matching was used to adjust the confounding factors related to IB administration. RESULTS: Of the 158 patients, 88 were treated with IB and 70 were treated without IB. A propensity score-matching analysis extracted 54 patients from each group. We found no statistical difference in the admission rate of the two groups (IB group: 25.9% vs non-IB group: 31.5%; P = 0.67). The post-treatment modified pulmonary index scores (mean ± SD) were also similar (IB: 6.6 ± 2.0 vs non-IB: 6.3 ± 2.5; P = 0.53). Only one patient (1.0%) treated with IB experienced vomiting, which resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSION: The metered-dose inhaler IB was ineffective in reducing the admission rate possibly because it was less effective than a nebulizer for IB inhalation.

Effect of Nebulized Magnesium vs Placebo Added to Albuterol on Hospitalization Among Children With Refractory Acute Asthma Treated in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: While intravenous magnesium decreases hospitalizations in refractory pediatric acute asthma, it is variably used because of invasiveness and safety concerns. The benefit of nebulized magnesium to prevent hospitalization is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of nebulized magnesium in children with acute asthma remaining in moderate or severe respiratory distress after initial therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized double-blind parallel-group clinical trial from September 26, 2011, to November 19, 2019, in 7 tertiary-care pediatric emergency departments in Canada. The participants were otherwise healthy children aged 2 to 17 years with moderate to severe asthma defined by a Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score of 5 or greater (on a 12-point scale) after a 1-hour treatment with an oral corticosteroid and 3 inhaled albuterol and ipratropium treatments. Of 5846 screened patients, 4332 were excluded for criteria, 273 declined participation, 423 otherwise excluded, 818 randomized, and 816 analyzed. Interventions: Participants were randomized to 3 nebulized albuterol treatments with either magnesium sulfate (n = 410) or 5.5% saline placebo (n = 408). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was hospitalization for asthma within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included PRAM score; respiratory rate; oxygen saturation at 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes; blood pressure at 20, 40, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes; and albuterol treatments within 240 minutes. Results: Among 818 randomized patients (median age, 5 years; 63% males), 816 completed the trial (409 received magnesium; 407, placebo). A total of 178 of the 409 children who received magnesium (43.5%) were hospitalized vs 194 of the 407 who received placebo (47.7%) (difference, -4.2%; absolute risk difference 95% [exact] CI, -11% to 2.8%]; P = .26). There were no significant between-group differences in changes from baseline to 240 minutes in PRAM score (difference of changes, 0.14 points [95% CI, -0.23 to 0.50]; P = .46); respiratory rate (0.17 breaths/min [95% CI, -1.32 to 1.67]; P = .82); oxygen saturation (-0.04% [95% CI, -0.53% to 0.46%]; P = .88); systolic blood pressure (0.78 mm Hg [95% CI, -1.48 to 3.03]; P = .50); or mean number of additional albuterol treatments (magnesium: 1.49, placebo: 1.59; risk ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.11]; P = .47). Nausea/vomiting or sore throat/nose occurred in 17 of the 409 children who received magnesium (4%) and 5 of the 407 who received placebo (1%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among children with refractory acute asthma in the emergency department, nebulized magnesium with albuterol, compared with placebo with albuterol, did not significantly decrease the hospitalization rate for asthma within 24 hours. The findings do not support use of nebulized magnesium with albuterol among children with refractory acute asthma. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01429415.

Pharmacologic anisocoria due to nebulized ipratropium bromide: A diagnostic challenge.

Anisocoria may be physiological or seen in fatal conditions, such as intracranial hemorrhage. Newly developing anisocoria may cause confusion and diagnostic difficulty in the emergency department (ED). A 35-year-old female was admitted to the ED with an asthma attack and dyspnea. On examination, the patient was observed to have bilateral rhonchi and was treated with nebulized albuterol (salbutamol) and ipratropium bromide. After the treatment, the dyspnea improved, and mydriasis developed in the left eye (left pupil diameter 9 mm, right 4 mm). An examination revealed that the left pupil was dilated and unreactive to light, but there was no neurological finding. Afterwards, the patient reported that, during the treatment, some aerosol had leaked from the left side of the mask and may have come into contact with her left eye. Given this information, a pilocarpine test was performed, and the patient was diagnosed with pharmacologic anisocoria. The pupil returned to normal within 24 h. Ipratropium bromide is a drug frequently used in patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea. During treatment, nebulized ipratropium may leak from the edge of the facial mask into the ipsilateral eye and may cause mydriasis. A pilocarpine test can be used to differentiate pharmacological anisocoria from other causes, such as third nerve palsy and Adie's pupil. Through the awareness of emergency physicians and the use of the pilocarpine test, a diagnosis can be made without engaging in time-consuming and costly analyses. In addition, this complication can be prevented using masks that better fit the face, as well as protective goggles or eye patches, during treatment.

An occupational exposure limit (OEL) approach to protect home healthcare workers exposed to common nebulized drugs.

Home healthcare is a growing area of employment. Assessment of occupational health risks to home health care workers (HHCWs) is important because in many cases the unique characteristics of the home environment do not facilitate the level of exposure control afforded to caregivers in hospitals and other fixed patient care sites. This assessment is focused on health risks to HHCWs from exposure to pharmaceutical drugs used to treat asthma and other respiratory diseases, which are commonly administered to patients in aerosolized form via nebulizers. We developed risk-based exposure limits for workers in the form of occupational exposure limits (OEL) values for exposure to nebulized forms of the three most common drugs administered by this method: albuterol, ipratropium, and budesonide. The derived OEL for albuterol was 2 µg/day, for ipratropium was 30 µg/day, and for budesonide was 11 µg/day. These OELs were derived based on human effect data and adjusted for pharmacokinetic variability and areas of uncertainty relevant to the underlying data (human and non-human) available for each drug. The resulting OEL values provide an input to the occupational risk assessment process to allow for comparisons to HHCW exposure that will guide risk management and exposure control decisions.

Acute severe asthma (status asthmaticus).

Acute severe asthma, formerly known as status asthmaticus, is defined as severe asthma unresponsive to repeated courses of beta-agonist therapy. It is a medical emergency that requires immediate recognition and treatment. Albuterol in combination with ipratropium bromide in the emergency department (ED) has been shown to decrease the time spent in the ED and the hospitalization rates. The benefits of ipratropium are not sustained after admission to the hospital. Oral or parenteral corticosteroids should be administered to all patients with acute severe asthma as early as possible because clinical benefits may not occur for a minimum of 6 to 12 hours. Viral respiratory infections are a common trigger for acute asthma; other causes include medical nonadherence, allergen exposure (especially pets and mold [e.g., Alternaria species]) in individuals who are severely atopic, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory exposure in patients with aspirin allergy, irritant inhalation (e.g., smoke, paint), exercise, and insufficient use of inhaled or oral corticosteroids. The patient's history should focus on the acute assessment of asthma control and morbidity, including current use of oral or inhaled corticosteroids; the number of hospitalizations, ED visits, intensive care unit admissions, and intubations; the frequency of albuterol use; the presence of nighttime symptoms; activity intolerance; current medications; exposure to allergens; and other significant medical conditions. Severe airflow obstruction may be predicted by accessory muscle use, difficulty speaking, refusal to recline < 30°, a pulse of >120 beats/min, and decreased breath sounds. More objective measures of airway obstruction via peak flow or forced expiratory volume in 1 second and pulse oximetry before oxygen administration usually are helpful. Pulse oximetry values of >90% are reassuring, although CO2 retention and a low partial pressure of oxygen may be missed.

Comparison of the efficacy of aerosol inhalation between the ipratropium bromide and terbutaline on the patients with AECOPD.

To observe the clinical efficacy of aerosol inhalation of ipratropium bromide and terbutaline on the patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A total of 136 COPD patients with acute exacerbation were divided into the ipratropium bromide group (n=69) and the terbutaline group (n=67). Patients in the ipratropium bromide group were required to take ipratropium bromide, while those in the terbutaline group took terbutaline for 3 days. Then, changes in symptoms, vital signs, blood-gas indicators and pulmonary functions were compared and analyzed between two groups. In ipratropium bromide group, patients with amelioration in vital signs and symptoms, especially for the symptom of coughing (P<0.01), were more than those in the terbutaline group, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). In addition, following medication, analysis showed that the improvement in the blood-gas indicators and pulmonary functions in the ipratropium bromide was excellent in comparison with the terbutaline group, especially the improvement in the pulmonary ventilation function (P<0.01). Comparison over the incidence rates of adverse events in the ipratropium bromide group and terbutaline group showed an evident difference (P<0.05). For treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of COPD, aerosol inhalation of ipratropium bromide is a safe but effective method.

The short-term bronchodilator effects of the dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor RPL554 in COPD.

We investigated the short-term bronchodilator effects of RPL554 (an inhaled dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor) combined with other bronchodilators in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with reversibility (>150 mL to short-acting bronchodilators).Study 1 was a six-way, placebo-controlled crossover study (n=36) with single doses of RPL554 (6 mg), salbutamol (200 µg), ipratropium (40 µg), RPL554 (6 mg)+salbutamol (200 µg), RPL554 (6 mg)+ipratropium (40 µg) or placebo. Study 2 was a three-way crossover study (n=30) of tiotropium (18 µg) combined with RPL554 (1.5 or 6 mg) or placebo for 3 days. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), lung volumes and specific airway conductance (sG aw) were measured.In study 1, peak FEV1 change compared with placebo was similar with RPL554, ipratropium and salbutamol (mean 223, 199 and 187 mL, respectively). The peak FEV1 was higher for RPL554+ipratropium versus ipratropium (mean difference 94 mL; p<0.0001) and RPL554+salbutamol versus salbutamol (mean difference 108 mL; p<0.0001). In study 2 (day 3), both RPL554 doses caused greater peak FEV1 effects than placebo. The average FEV1 (0-12 h) increase was greater with RPL554 6 mg only versus placebo (mean difference 65 mL; p=0.0009). In both studies, lung volumes and sG aw showed greater RPL554 combination treatment effects versus monotherapy.RPL554 combined with standard bronchodilators caused additional bronchodilation and hyperinflation reduction.

Comparison of the in vitro pharmacological profiles of long-acting muscarinic antagonists in human bronchus.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) have been recommended for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and (more recently) asthma. However, the in vitro pharmacological profiles of the four LAMAs currently marketed (tiotropium, umeclidinium, aclidinium and glycopyrronium) have not yet been compared (relative to ipratropium) by using the same experimental approach. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: With a total of 560 human bronchial rings, we investigated the antagonists' potency, onset and duration of action for inhibition of the contractile response evoked by electrical field stimulation. We also evaluated the antagonists' potency for inhibiting cumulative concentration-contraction curves for acetylcholine and carbachol. KEY RESULTS: The onset and duration of action were concentration-dependent. At submaximal, equipotent concentrations, the antagonists' onsets of action were within the same order of magnitude. However, the durations of action differed markedly. After washout, ipratropium's inhibitory activity decreased rapidly (within 30-90 min) but those of tiotropium and umeclidinium remained stable (at above 70%) for at least 9 h. Aclidinium and glycopyrronium displayed less stable inhibitory effects, with a progressive loss of inhibition at submaximal concentrations. In contrast to ipratropium, all the LAMAs behaved as insurmountable antagonists by decreasing the maximum responses to both acetylcholine and carbachol. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The observed differences in the LAMAs' in vitro pharmacological profiles in the human bronchus provide a compelling pharmacological rationale for the differences in the drugs' respective recommended daily doses and frequencies of administration.