Studies on Bankart Repair for Anterior Shoulder Instability Show Poor Reporting of Data and Reflect Low Level of Evidence: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To assess the quality and level of evidence of studies reporting on Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: A search was performed using the PubMed/Medline database for all studies that reported clinical outcomes on Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability. The search term "Bankart repair" with all results were analyzed via strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent investigators scored each included study based on the 10 criteria of the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) out of 100 and gave each study a score out of 25 based on the Anterior Shoulder Instability (ASI) Methodology criteria. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-six studies were included in the analysis and encompassed a total of 19,156 patients and 19,317 surgical procedures for Bankart repair for shoulder instability. Overall, 81.6% of studies were Level III or IV evidence. The mean CMS score for the studies was 55.3 out of 100, and the mean ASI Methodology score for the studies was 12.1 out of 25. Weaknesses in the studies were identified in sample size, description of preoperative investigations and diagnoses, reporting of mean glenoid bone loss, nonsubjective clinical outcome reporting, and description of associated pathologies. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of studies reporting the clinical outcomes of Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability are of low methodological quality and have a low level of evidence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study emphasizes need for greater reporting of many variables such as body mass index, mean glenoid bone loss, and patient-reported outcomes and provides a framework for future studies reporting.

Biomechanical Analysis Reveals Shoulder Instability With Bipolar Bone Loss Is Best Treated With Dynamic Anterior Stabilization for On-Track Lesions and With Remplissage for Off-Track Lesions.

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical effects of augmenting Bankart repair (BR) with either remplissage or dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability with on-track or off-track bipolar bone loss. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested at 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the intact, injury, and repair conditions. Injury conditions included 15% glenoid bone loss with an on-track or off-track Hill-Sachs lesion as previously recommended. Repair conditions included isolated BR, BR with remplissage, and BR with DAS (long head of biceps transfer). The glenohumeral stability was assessed by measuring the anterior translation under 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 N load and maximum load without causing instability at mid-range (60°) and end-range (90°) external rotation (ER). Maximum range of motion (ROM) was measured by applying a 2.2-N·m torque in passive ER and internal rotation. RESULTS: Isolated BR failed to restore native glenohumeral stability in both on-track and off-track bipolar bone loss models. Both remplissage and DAS significantly decreased the anterior instability in the bipolar bone loss models, showing better restoration than the isolated BR. In the on-track lesions, DAS successfully restored native glenohumeral stability and mobility, whereas remplissage significantly decreased anterior translation without load (-2.12 ± 1.07 mm at 90° ER, P = .003; -1.98 ± 1.23 mm at 60° ER, P = .015). In the off-track lesions, remplissage restored native glenohumeral stability but led to significant ROM limitation (-8.6° ± 2.3° for internal rotation, P < .001; -13.9° ± 6.2° for ER, P = .003), whereas DAS failed to restore native stability at 90° ER regarding the increased anterior translation under 50 N (4.10 ± 1.53 mm, P < .001) and decreased maximum load (-13.8 ± 9.2 N, P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: At time-zero, both remplissage and DAS significantly reduced residual anterior instability compared with isolated BR in the bipolar bone loss models and restored the native glenohumeral stability under most translational loads. However, remplissage could decrease the anterior translation without load for on-track lesions and may restrict ROM for off-track lesions, whereas DAS failed to restore native stability under high translational loads for off-track lesions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: DAS could be recommended to treat on-track bipolar bone loss with less biomechanical adverse effects, whereas remplissage might be the preferred procedure to address off-track bipolar bone loss for better stability.

Editorial Commentary: For Patients With Shoulder Instability, On-Track Hill-Sachs Lesion Plus Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss May Be the Best Indication for Dynamic Anterior Stabilization Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon.

As the definition of shoulder glenoid critical bone loss has evolved and decreased from 25% to 17% to 13.5%, indications for bone block procedures for shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss have expanded. While the bone block procedure is an effective treatment for almost all cases of anterior shoulder instability, regardless of the amount of bone loss, many surgeons prefer to perform a bone block procedure only in cases of critical bone loss due to risk of complications. Thus, for cases of minimal (subcritical) bone loss, Remplissage has been recommended to enhance Bankart repair. As an alternative, dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) using the long head of the biceps tendon has been recommended as a surgical option in patients with shoulder instability and subcritical bone loss. How do we decide? A biomechanical study shows DAS is an effective method for on-track Hill-Sachs lesions with subcritical bone loss, and Remplissage is more effective for off-track Hill-Sachs lesions. Clinical studies are required to complement biomechanical findings.

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Shoulder Stabilization Combining Arthroscopic Bankart and Inferior Capsular Shift Avoids Open Surgery in Athletes Without Critical Glenoid Bone Loss.

Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations can cause a myriad of injuries, each with their own unique set of challenges with respect to surgical management. The debate of whether open or arthroscopic management is the superior approach is one that predates most currently practicing orthopaedic surgeons yet remains one of the most actively researched areas of orthopaedics. Current trends favor arthroscopic management for anterior instability secondary to a Bankart lesion in patients without other risk factors for instability, such as critical glenoid bone loss. However, excellent results are not guaranteed following arthroscopic Bankart repair, particularly in athletes, due to high rates of recurrence. While the technique of inferior to superior capsular shift is not new, transitioning a historically open technique to the arthroscopic world may represent another tool in the glenohumeral instability management toolbox. While perspectives are evolving, more evidence supporting arthroscopic techniques like the capsular shift are needed to better identify appropriate patient populations.

Humeral Head Reconstruction of Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesions.

Compared with anterior instability, posterior shoulder dislocations are a rare entity and are often missed at presentation. A concomitant anteromedial impression fracture of the humeral head, or a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion, is commonly present with these dislocations and is more pronounced with a longer timeline to reduction. Treatment of these defects ranges from nonsurgical treatment to soft-tissue procedures, bony reconstruction, and arthroplasty. Management may be dictated by various factors, such as patient demands, defect size and location, concomitant injuries, and underlying etiology. Small reverse Hill-Sachs defects without engagement can generally be treated nonsurgically or with benign neglect, whereas larger defects (>20%) often require surgery. The most reported surgical techniques are the (arthroscopic) McLaughlin and modified McLaughlin procedure, disimpaction and bone grafting, or reconstruction of the defect with autograft or with fresh (or fresh-frozen) osteochondral allograft. Finally, arthroplasty is generally required for large defects, where more than 45% to 50% of the articular cartilage is involved. Overall, reported outcomes generally reflect patient satisfaction for most patients, with a low incidence of secondary instability or posttraumatic arthritis, although better results are achieved when recognizing and treating these injuries in the more acute setting.

Arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage results in lower rates of recurrent instability with similar range of motion compared to isolated arthroscopic Bankart for anterior glenohumeral instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The addition of the remplissage procedure to an arthroscopic Bankart procedure has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, yet at the expense of potentially decreasing shoulder range of motion. The purpose of this study was to assess recurrent instability, range of motion, functional outcomes and rates of return to sport outcomes in patients undergoing an isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair compared to those undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair in addition to the remplissage procedure. METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted using three databases (MEDLINE/OVID, EMBASE and PubMed). Retrieved studies were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria for comparative studies. Data were extracted and meta-analysis performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies (13 level III studies, 2 level II studies and 1 level I) were included with a total of 507 and 704 patients in the Bankart plus remplissage and isolated Bankart repair groups, respectively. No studies reported glenoid bone loss of >20% with the least percentage of glenoid bone loss reported among studies being <1%. There was a significantly increased rate of recurrent dislocations (odds ratio [OR] = 4.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.380-7.48, p < 0.00001) and revision procedures (OR = 3.36, 95% CI: 1.52-7.41, p = 0.003) in the isolated Bankart repair group compared to the Bankart plus remplissage group. Additionally, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of external rotation at side (n.s.), in abduction (n.s.) or at forward flexion (n.s.) at final follow-up. Furthermore, return to preinjury level of sport favoured the Bankart plus remplissage group (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.85, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart plus remplissage for anterior shoulder instability have lower rates of recurrent instability, higher rates of return to sport, and no significant difference in range of motion at final follow-up when compared to an isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair. Further large, prospective studies are needed to further determine which patients and degree of bone loss would benefit most from augmentation with the remplissage procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Glenohumeral morphological predictors of recurrent shoulder instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate glenohumeral morphological features on a magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) to determine risk factors for recurrence of anterior shoulder instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent ABR between 2012 and 2017 was performed to identify patients who had recurrence of instability following stabilisation (Group 1). These were pair-matched in a 2:1 ratio for age, gender and sport with a control (Group 2) who underwent ABR without recurrence. Preoperative MRAs were evaluated for risk factors for recurrence, with glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesions also measured. Multilinear and multilogistic regression models were used to evaluate factors affecting recurrence. RESULTS: Overall, 72 patients were included in this study, including 48 patients without recurrence and 24 patients with recurrent instability. There was a significant difference between the two groups in mean glenoid bone loss (Group 1: 7.3% vs. Group 2: 5.7%, p < 0.0001) and the rate of off-track Hill-Sachs lesions (Group 1: 20.8% vs. Group 2: 0%, p = 0.0003). Of the variables analysed in logistic regression, increased glenoid anteversion (p = 0.02), acromioclavicular (AC) degeneration (p = 0.03) and increased Hill-Sachs width were associated with increased risk of failure. Increased chondral version (p = 0.01) and humeral head diameter in the anteriorposterior view were found to be protective and associated with a greater likelihood of success. CONCLUSION: Glenoid anteversion was a risk factor for recurrent instability, whereas increased chondral version and humeral head diameter were associated with higher rates of success following ABR. Glenoid bone loss, presence of an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion, increased Hill-Sachs width and AC degeneration were also associated with failure. These findings should be used by surgeons to stratify risk for recurrence following ABR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Remplissage in Addition to Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability With On-Track Hill-Sachs Lesions Reduces Residual Apprehension Without External Rotation Limitation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of remplissage as an adjunct to Bankart repair in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation combined with on-track Hill-Sachs lesion. METHODS: Arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage data (December 2018-2020) were collected (BR group). Inclusion criteria were (1) recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation, (2) on-track Hill-Sachs lesion, (3) minimal/subcritical glenoid bone loss (<17%), and (4) postoperative follow-up >1 year. Exclusion criteria were (1) revision surgery, (2) first dislocation with acute glenoid rim fracture, and (3) combined with other surgery. The control group was identified in Bankart repair-only cohort (B group). All patients were evaluated preoperatively, and at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and then annually postoperatively. Visual analogue scale for pain, Self-Assessment Numerical Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score, ROWE, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability were evaluated at preoperative and final follow-up. Residual apprehension experience and external rotation deficit were evaluated. Patients, who were followed-up for more than 1 year, were asked how often they experienced any subjective apprehension in 4 grades (1: always, 2: frequently, 3: occasionally, 4: never). Patients who had a history of recurrent dislocation or revision surgery were investigated. RESULTS: In total, 53 patients (B, 28; BR, 25) were included. At final follow-up, both groups showed improvement in 5 clinical scores postsurgery (P < .001). The BR group showed greater ROWE scores than the B group (B: 75.2 ± 13.6, BR: 84.4 ± 10.8; P = .009). Residual apprehension patient ratio (B: 71.4% [20/28], BR: 32% [8/25]; P = .004) and the mean subjective apprehension grade (B: 3.1 ± 0.6, BR: 3.6 ± 0.6; P = .005) showed statistically significant difference, whereas no patients in either group experienced external rotation deficit (B: 14.8 ± 12.9°, BR: 18.0 ± 15.2°, P = .420). Only 1 patient in the B group had not responded to surgery, with dislocation recurrence (P = .340). CONCLUSIONS: Remplissage with arthroscopic Bankart repair in on-track Hill-Sachs lesion has a role in reducing residual apprehension without external rotation limitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Editorial Commentary: Glenoid Reconstruction With Autologous Tricortical Iliac Crest Represents an Alternative to Bankart Repair and Remplissage for Anterior Shoulder Instability With Subcritical Bone Loss.

Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations are estimated to occur in approximately 2% of the population, frequently with concomitant anterior-inferior labral tears and associated Hill-Sachs lesions of the humeral head. So-called bipolar (or engaging) lesions with attritional bone loss may be exacerbated by recurrent instability, in terms of both prevalence and severity. The glenoid track concept and distance to dislocation have offered context for evaluating bipolar lesions, and increasingly, options for bone block reconstruction are considered for definitive treatment. Recently, concerns have been raised regarding coracoid transfer or Latarjet treatment, particularly with screw constructs in which catastrophic failure, hardware breakage, and secondary arthritis may develop. The Eden-Hybinette procedure, or tricortical iliac crest autograft bone augmentation, may represent a promising alternative to existing options while also restoring native glenoid bone stock. Additionally, suture button fixation may obviate the traditional pitfalls of prior bone block procedures while also achieving reproducible functional outcomes and low rates of recurrence. However, this must be considered alongside other contemporary arthroscopic treatments, such as combined arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage.

Editorial Commentary: Shoulder Remplissage Is a Beneficial Addition to Bankart or Glenoid Bone Loss Treatment: Stay on Track and Use Wisely.

In patients with on-track shoulder Hill-Sachs lesions, the addition of remplissage using a double-pulley technique to Bankart repair improves outcomes including residual apprehension and without loss of external rotation. A caveat is that measurement of both the Hill-Sachs lesion and glenoid bone loss may be inconsistent. A second caveat is that determination of the glenoid track can be affected by scapular positioning. Not all "on-track" lesions are alike. In terms of outcome assessment, apprehension has up to 95% specificity for anterior shoulder instability and is a key finding in determining the results of shoulder stabilization. Recurrent instability may not be as sensitive of an outcome measure, because patients will avoid positions of apprehension. Finally, remplissage should be used cautiously in peripheral track lesions. For smaller Hill-Sachs lesions, remplissage can provide extraordinary success, and for larger lesions that are close to engaging, glenoid bone loss must also be treated, especially in a younger, active patient.

Arthroscopic Autologous Iliac Crest Grafting Results in Similar Outcomes and Low Recurrence Compared to Remplissage Plus Bankart Repair for Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bipolar Bone Defects.

PURPOSE: To compare the functional outcomes, range of motion (ROM), recurrence rates, and complication rates of arthroscopic autologous iliac crest grafting (AICG) and Remplissage plus Bankart repair (RB) for anterior shoulder instability with bipolar bone defects. METHODS: This study enrolled patients undergoing arthroscopic AICG or RB with 13.5-25% glenoid bone defect combined with Hill-Sachs lesion between January 2013 and April 2020, who had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated by Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), Rowe score, Constant score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Active ROM, return to sports, recurrence, self-reported apprehension, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: This study included 60 patients, including 28 AICG (Group A) and 32 RB (Group R). Mean glenoid bone defect was similar (17.7% ± 3.1% vs 16.6% ± 2.4%; P = .122). Both groups showed significant postoperative improvement in Rowe score, SSV, OSIS, and Constant score. No significant difference was found in postoperative Rowe Score (87.7 vs 85.2; P = .198). A total of 20/28 (71.4%) patients in Group A versus 26/32 (81.3%) patients in Group R met the Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State determined by VAS pain score (P = .370). Both groups showed high return-to-sports rates (67.8% vs 71.8%; P = .735) and slightly decreased ROM. There were two cases of recurrence in Group A versus one in Group R (P = .594). Group R had insignificantly higher positive self-reported apprehension rate (40.6% vs 17.9%; P = .055). CONCLUSIONS: For anterior shoulder instability with bipolar bone defects, both arthroscopic AICG and RB can result in satisfactory clinical outcomes, good postoperative ROM, and low recurrence and complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Increased rates of subjective shoulder instability after Bankart repair with remplissage compared to Latarjet surgery.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to the ideal management of young active patients with subcritical glenoid bone loss and an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion, and the Latarjet and arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage are effective surgical options. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of recurrent instability and reoperation, as well as patient-reported outcome measures, between Latarjet and arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage surgery patients. The authors hypothesized that there would be no difference in rates of recurrent instability, reoperation, and postoperative outcomes between patients who underwent Latarjet surgery and patients who underwent Bankart repair with concomitant remplissage postoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent primary shoulder stabilization for shoulder instability from 2014 to 2019 were screened. Latarjet and Bankart repair with remplissage patients were included if arthroscopic surgery was performed in response to anterior shoulder instability. Recurrent instability, revision, shoulder range of motion, return to sport (RTS), and patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford Shoulder Instability, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form scores) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Overall, 43 Latarjet patients (age: 29.8 ± 12.1 years, 36 males 7 females) and 28 Bankart repair with remplissage patients (age: 28.2 ± 8.8 years, 25 males 3 females) were included with a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 1.9 years. Patients who underwent Latarjet surgery had larger amounts of bone loss (19% vs. 11%, P < .001), a lower rate of off-track Hill-Sachs lesions (47% vs. 82%, P < .001), and more frequently had a history of chronic shoulder dislocations (88% vs. 43%, P < .001) compared to Bankart repair with remplissage patients. Latarjet patients less frequently reported feeling subjective shoulder instability after surgery (21% vs. 50%, P = .022), which was defined as feeling apprehension or experiencing a shoulder subluxation or dislocation event. There were no differences in rates of postoperative dislocation, revision, reoperation, or RTS, as well as patient-reported outcome scores, between groups (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: Despite differences in osseous defects, Latarjet and Bankart repair with remplissage patients had similar rates of clinical, patient-reported, and RTS outcomes at a mean of 3.3 years postoperatively. Latarjet surgery patients may be less likely to experience subjective shoulder instability postoperatively than patients who undergo Bankart repair with concomitant remplissage.

Prognostic factors associated with failure to return to sport following primary arthroscopic Bankart repair: a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Even though many studies have been published regarding return-to-sport (RTS) rates following arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR), evidence regarding prognostic factors for which patients do not RTS is limited. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors that are associated with failure to RTS and failure to return to preinjury level of sport (RTPS) following primary ABR. The hypothesis was that prognostic factors for failure to RTS and failure to RTPS would be similar to those predisposing recurrence. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective case-control study including 6 Dutch hospitals was performed. Consecutive patients who underwent primary ABR between 2014 and 2019 were invited to participate and received a questionnaire. Sports participation was assessed before symptom onset, at 6 months postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Failure to RTS was defined as no return to any sport, and failure to RTPS was defined as no return to the same level (or a higher level) of sport. Prognostic factors for failure to RTS or failure to RTPS were identified using logistic regression. Covariates for the regression analysis were selected based on univariate analyses. RESULTS: This study included 318 patients with a mean follow-up period of 4.2 years (standard deviation, 1.8 years). Of these 318 patients, 26 (8.2%) did not RTS and 100 (31%) did not RTPS. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that glenoid bone loss (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.15; P = .001) and overhead use of the shoulder during work (OR, 3.77; 95% CI, 1.45-9.85; P = .007) were prognostic factors for failure to RTS. In addition, it showed that preoperative professional sports level (OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.07-8.05; P = .04) and preoperative body mass index (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P = .04) were prognostic factors for failure to RTPS. Repair of a bony Bankart lesion (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.81; P = .02) and the presence of an anterior labral periosteal sleeve avulsion (ALPSA) (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.97; P = .04) were identified as factors that facilitated RTPS. CONCLUSION: This study identified glenoid bone loss and overhead use of the shoulder during work to be associated with failure to RTS. Moreover, preoperative sports level and preoperative body mass index were found to be associated with failure to RTPS. In contrast, a bony Bankart lesion and an anterior labral periosteal sleeve avulsion (ALPSA) lesion facilitated RTPS. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm these factors and determine which part of the effect can be attributed to (failure of) surgical treatment or changes in behavior.

Remplissage reduces recurrent instability in high-risk patients with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare recurrent instability rates between patients with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions who underwent arthroscopic labral repair (ALR) alone and those who underwent ALR with remplissage (ALR-R). Our hypothesis was that ALR-R would decrease the rate of recurrent instability, especially among patients at high risk of recurrent instability after ALR, such as contact athletes with near-track Hill-Sachs lesions. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients aged 14-50 years with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions who underwent ALR-R or ALR without remplissage between January 2014 and December 2019 with minimum 2-year follow-up. The exclusion criteria included prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery, >15% glenoid bone loss (GBL), off-track Hill-Sachs lesion, concomitant shoulder procedure, and connective tissue disorder. Age, sex, follow-up, and contact sports participation were recorded. GBL, Hills-Sachs interval (HSI), glenoid track, and distance to dislocation (DTD) were determined from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans. Affected-shoulder range of motion, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores, Subjective Shoulder Value scores, and recurrent dislocation and/or revision surgery status were also collected. A subgroup analysis was performed on "high-risk" patients (defined as participants in contact sports with DTD <10 mm) from each cohort. RESULTS: The ALR-R cohort included 56 patients, and the ALR cohort included 127. ALR-R patients had greater GBL (P = .004) and a greater HSI (P < .001). In the ALR-R cohort, only 1 patient (1.8%) had a recurrent dislocation and there were no revision operations. In comparison, in the ALR cohort, 14 patients (11.0%) had recurrent dislocations (P = .040) and 8 (6.3%) underwent revision operations (P = .11). Univariate analysis showed that remplissage protected against recurrent dislocation (P = .040) whereas younger age (P = .004), contact sports participation (P = .001), and increased GBL (P = .048) were associated with recurrent dislocation. Multivariate analysis showed that HSI (P = .001) and contact sports participation (P = .002) predicted recurrent dislocation. Among high-risk patients, only 1 patient (4.2%) in the ALR-R group had a recurrent instability event vs. 6 (66.7%) in the ALR group (P < .001). The high-risk ALR-R subgroup also had significantly better final Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (P = .008) and Subjective Shoulder Value (P = .001) scores than the high-risk ALR subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior shoulder instability patients with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions have lower recurrent dislocation rates after ALR plus remplissage when compared with ALR alone. This is especially true for high-risk patients, such as contact athletes with a DTD <10 mm.

Long-term recurrence rate in anterior shoulder instability after Bankart repair based on the on- and off-track concept.

BACKGROUND: Since its first proposal, the concept of on- and off-track lesions in anterior shoulder instability has gained clinical relevance as a tool to predict the failure rate of arthroscopic Bankart repair. Current literature only reports either short-term follow-up or long-term results of small sample sizes. The aim of this study was to provide a long-term evaluation of recurrent instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair in a large cohort using the on-track vs. off-track concept as a predictor for failure. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 271 patients who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability between 1998 and 2007. All patients with a minimum follow-up of 78 months and a preoperative computed tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan were included into the study. Preoperative CT and/or MRI scans were used to determine the glenoid track and width of Hill-Sachs lesion. Recurrence of instability was defined as presence of instability symptoms (dislocation, subluxation, and/or apprehension) or revision surgery (stabilization procedure) and was assessed as the primary outcome parameter. RESULTS: The glenoid track of 163 shoulders was assessed (female n = 51, male n = 112) with a mean follow-up of 124 months (99.4-145.6, standard deviation = 2.5) and a mean age of 24 years (20-34.). An off-track Hill-Sachs lesion was found in 77 cases (47%), and in 86 cases (53 %) it was on-track. The rate of recurrent instability in the off-track group was 74% (n = 57) compared with 27% (n = 23) in the on-track group (P < .001). The overall rate of revision surgery due to instability was 29% (n = 48) after a mean time of 50.9 months (±42.8) following Bankart repair. The rate of revision surgery in the off-track group was 48% (n = 37) after a mean of 53.5 months (±42.0) vs. 13% (n = 11) after 42.3 months (±46.3) in the on-track group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the on- and off-track concept helps to distinguish patients for whom an isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair yields long-term benefits. Because of the high rate of recurrent instability in the off-track group, an off-track lesion should be treated surgically in such a way that the off-track lesion is converted into an on-track lesion.

"Nearly off-track lesions" or a short distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track does not seem to be accurate in predicting recurrence after an arthroscopic Bankart repair in a military population: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: On-track lesions with a short distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track (nearly off-track) may predispose recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) in the general population. The aim of this study was to determine if a shorter distance between the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion and the medial edge of the glenoid track could accurately predict recurrence after an ABR in a high-demand military population. It was hypothesized that a shorter distance would not accurately predict recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective monocenter case-control study was performed at the Dutch Central Military Hospital. Patients with an on-track Hill-Sachs lesion who underwent a primary ABR between 2014 and 2019 with a minimal follow-up of 2 years and a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment received a questionnaire. The primary outcome was recurrence, defined as a complete dislocation or subluxation. Glenoid bone loss was assessed using a linear-based method on MRI. The distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track was defined as the distance to dislocation (DTD). A receiver operating characteristic curve was created to determine the predictive value of the DTD for recurrence. Logistic regression was used to determine preoperative risk factors that predispose recurrence. Covariates were selected based on univariable analysis and included gender, body mass index, age at surgery and first dislocation, laterality, smoking habits, overhead shoulder activity during work, preoperative dislocations, sports type and level, bony or labral lesions on MRI, and DTD. RESULTS: In total, 80 patients with an average follow-up of 4.8 ± 1.9 years completed the questionnaire and were included in the analyses. Seventeen patients (21%) experienced recurrence at the final follow-up. No difference in DTD was observed among patients who experienced recurrence (9 ± 4 mm) compared with patients who did not (9 ± 5 mm; P = .81). The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated no predictive power of DTD for recurrence (area under the curve = 0.49). Smoking at the time of surgery (odds ratio: 3.9; confidence interval: 1.2-12.7; P = .02) and overhead shoulder movement during work (odds ratio: 9.3; confidence interval: 1.1-78.0; P = .04) were associated with recurrence according to the logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: A shorter DTD demonstrated no accuracy in predicting recurrence in a military population. Smoking at the time of surgery and overhead shoulder activity during work were associated with recurrence; however, these analyses were underpowered to draw valid conclusions.

Open anatomical glenoid reconstruction with an iliac crest bone autograft effectively resolves off-track Hill-Sachs lesions to on-track lesions.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine if "off-track" Hill-Sachs lesions in patients with dynamic anteroinferior instability were transformed into "on-track" lesions using iliac bone autografts with screw fixation. The secondary purpose was to observe if postoperative bony remodeling would occur over time, resulting in recurrent "off-track" Hill-Sachs lesions with corresponding instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and CT records of 8 patients with an "off-track" Hill-Sachs lesion who underwent open anatomical glenoid reconstruction with an iliac crest bone autograft. Hill-Sachs lesions, glenoid track widths, and glenoid surface areas were measured on a preoperative and two postoperative (6 weeks, ≥ 2 years) 3D-CT models to determine graft resorption over time. All patients were available for postoperative clinical and CT final follow-up 3 years (2-4 years) postoperatively. RESULTS: In all patients, the Hill-Sachs lesions were "on-track" 6 weeks postoperatively and remained "on-track" at final-follow-up. Compared to preoperative values, the glenoid track width and glenoid surface area both were higher 6 weeks postoperatively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively) and at final follow-up (p < 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively). Whereas the glenoid track width between 6 weeks and final follow-up showed no decrease (p = 0.234), glenoid surface area tended to decrease (p = 0.055). The median SSV was 93 points (85-95 points), the Rowe score 90 points (80-100 points) and the WOSI 1980 points (1783-2067 points) at final follow-up. No recurrent dislocations or subluxations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: An open anatomical glenoid reconstruction with an iliac crest bone autograft technique using screw fixation effectively transformed "off-track" Hill-Sachs lesions to "on-track" lesions, resulting in good short-term clinical outcomes. Whereas glenoid surface area tended to be reduced by bony remodeling processes over time, the glenoid track width did not decrease at final follow-up and consequently no recurrence of "off-track" lesions occurred. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series; Level of evidence, IV.

Posterior shoulder dislocation with associated reverse Hill-Sachs lesion: clinical outcome 10 years after joint-preserving surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Posterior shoulder dislocation in association with reverse Hill-Sachs lesion is a rather rare injury. Few studies reporting results after joint-preserving surgery in these cases are available. This current study presents the clinical outcomes 10 years postoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective case series, we operatively treated 12 consecutive patients (all males) after posterior shoulder dislocation with associated reverse Hill-Sachs lesion using joint-preserving techniques. Patients received surgery in a single center between January 2008 and December 2011. The joint-preserving surgical procedure was chosen depending on the defect size and bone quality. The following outcome-measures were analyzed: Constant-Score, DASH-Score, ROWE-Score, and SF-12. Results 1, 5, and 10 years postoperatively were compared. RESULTS: Out of 12 patients, ten patients (83.3%) were followed-up with a mean follow-up interval of 10.7 years (range 9.3-12.8). The mean patient age at the time of the last follow-up was 51 years (32-66). The outcome scores at the final follow-up were: Constant 92.5 (range 70.0-100), DASH 3.2 (0.0-10.8), ROWE 91.0 (85.0-100), and SF-12 87.8 (77.5-98.3). Clinical results had improved from 1 to 5 years postoperatively and showed a tendency for even further improvement after 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Joint-preserving surgical therapy of posterior shoulder dislocation provides excellent results when the morphology of the reverse Hill-Sachs lesion is respected in surgical decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 223/2012BO2, 02 August 2010.

Anterior mid-portion capsular tear with Bankart lesion in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation: outcome report and bone defect evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to report the incidence of anterior mid-portion capsular tears identified during arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR), the clinical outcomes of repairing this combined lesion, and to evaluate the associated bone defects. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients undergoing ABR between January 2014 and December 2017. Data from patients with capsular tears identified during ABR were included and analyzed. Age, number of dislocations, repair technique, follow-up results, and X-rays were reviewed. The size of the glenoid defect and Hill-Sachs lesion were reviewed via magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA). RESULTS: Records of 95 patients undergoing ABR during the study period were reviewed, and nine were included. The overall incidence of capsular tears was 9.5% and the mean age at surgery was 45.3 ± 14.3 years. All cases had > 3 dislocations before treatment. All patients had labral lesions, and one had a glenoid defect. Hill-Sachs lesions were observed in eight patients. Seven patients underwent MRA examination, and all seven showed axillary pouch disruption. Over 3.9 ± 1.1 years of follow-up, there was no instability recurrence, and Rowe scores improved from 42.2 to 96.7 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There was no recurrent shoulder instability after combined arthroscopic repair of capsular and Bankart lesions. There were Rowe score improvements over at least three years of follow-up. Although our case number was small, we found that mid-portion capsular tear occurred in patients over 30 years with multiple recurrent dislocations, with or without small glenoid bone defects, and with axillary pouch disruption on MRA images.

The Addition of Remplissage to Free Bone Block Restores Translation and Stiffness Compared to Bone Block Alone or Latarjet in a Bipolar Bone Loss Model.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare glenohumeral stability following a Latarjet, a free bone block (FBB), and a FBB with remplissage for bipolar bone loss. METHODS: Nine matched pairs of fresh frozen cadavers were tested in a custom biomechanical apparatus with rotation and progressive translational loading. The free bone block group consisted of a distal tibial allograft with an all-suture tape construct. The Latarjet group was performed with the native coracoid and two partially threaded cannulated screws. A bipolar bone loss model was created with 20% glenoid bone loss and an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion. Testing conditions included the 1) native state, 2) bipolar bone loss model, 3) Latarjet, 4) FBB with distal tibial allograft secured with cerclage sutures, and 5) FBB with remplissage. Each condition was tested for translation, humeral head apex shift, stiffness, and dislocation force. RESULTS: There were no differences in translation, stiffness, or dislocation forced between the FBB alone and Latarjet groups. The FBB with remplissage group demonstrated the lowest anterior-inferior translation at 90° of ER, which was statistically significant compared to Latarjet 20N (P = .013) and compared to the FBB alone at 40N (P = .024) and 50N (P = .011). The FBB with remplissage group was significantly stiffer compared to FBB alone at 90° ER with approximately 60% change in stiffness (P = .028). The force required to dislocate the humeral head after treatment was highest in the FBB with remplissage group, which was statistically significant compared to the FBB alone (P = .003) and Latarjet groups (P = .018). CONCLUSION: The addition of remplissage to a FBB restores translation and stiffness closer to the intact state compared to a FBB alone or Latarjet in a bipolar bone loss model with an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion. In this model, dislocation force significantly increased with the addition of remplissage to the FBB. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This biomechanical study provides evidence that Latarjet and FBB are both acceptable forms of treatment for bipolar bone loss, but stability can be enhanced with the addition of remplissage following glenoid reconstruction.