Kidney organoids reveal redundancy in viral entry pathways during ACE2-dependent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

With a high incidence of acute kidney injury among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, considerable attention has been focussed on whether SARS-CoV-2 specifically targets kidney cells to directly impact renal function, or whether renal damage is primarily an indirect outcome. To date, several studies have utilized kidney organoids to understand the pathogenesis of COVID-19, revealing the ability for SARS-CoV-2 to predominantly infect cells of the proximal tubule (PT), with reduced infectivity following administration of soluble ACE2. However, the immaturity of standard human kidney organoids represents a significant hurdle, leaving the preferred SARS-CoV-2 processing pathway, existence of alternate viral receptors, and the effect of common hypertensive medications on the expression of ACE2 in the context of SARS-CoV-2 exposure incompletely understood. Utilizing a novel kidney organoid model with enhanced PT maturity, genetic- and drug-mediated inhibition of viral entry and processing factors confirmed the requirement for ACE2 for SARS-CoV-2 entry but showed that the virus can utilize dual viral spike protein processing pathways downstream of ACE2 receptor binding. These include TMPRSS- and CTSL/CTSB-mediated non-endosomal and endocytic pathways, with TMPRSS10 likely playing a more significant role in the non-endosomal pathway in renal cells than TMPRSS2. Finally, treatment with the antihypertensive ACE inhibitor, lisinopril, showed negligible impact on receptor expression or susceptibility of renal cells to infection. This study represents the first in-depth characterization of viral entry in stem cell-derived human kidney organoids with enhanced PTs, providing deeper insight into the renal implications of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. IMPORTANCE: Utilizing a human iPSC-derived kidney organoid model with improved proximal tubule (PT) maturity, we identified the mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 entry in renal cells, confirming ACE2 as the sole receptor and revealing redundancy in downstream cell surface TMPRSS- and endocytic Cathepsin-mediated pathways. In addition, these data address the implications of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in the setting of the commonly prescribed ACE-inhibitor, lisinopril, confirming its negligible impact on infection of kidney cells. Taken together, these results provide valuable insight into the mechanism of viral infection in the human kidney.

Population pharmacokinetics of lisinopril in hypertensive children and adolescents with normal to mildly reduced kidney function.

AIMS: Lisinopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, is a frequently prescribed antihypertensive drug in the paediatric population, while being used off-label under the age of 6 years in the USA and for all paediatric patients globally. The SAFEPEDRUG project (IWT-130033) investigated lisinopril pharmacokinetics in hypertensive paediatric patients corresponding with the day-to-day clinical population. METHODS: The dose-escalation pilot study included 13 children with primary and secondary hypertension who received oral lisinopril once daily in the morning; doses ranged from 0.05 to 0.2 mg kg-1 . Patients were aged between 1.9 and 17.9 years (median 13.5 years) and weight ranged between 9.62 and 97.2 kg (median 53.2 kg). All data were analysed using Monolix version 2020R1 (Lixoft, France) and R version 3.6.2. RESULTS: A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination optimally describes the data. Parameter estimates of absorption rate constant (0.075 h-1 [0.062, 0.088], typical value [95% confidence interval]), volume of distribution (31.38 L 70 kg-1 [10.5, 52.3]) and elimination clearance (24.2 L h-1 70 kg-1 [19.5, 28.9]) show good predictive ability. Significant covariate effects include total body weight on elimination clearance, and distribution volume and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on elimination clearance. The effects of eGFR on the elimination clearance are optimally described by a linear effect centred around 105 mL min-1  1.73 m-2 . The effects of body weight were implemented using fixed allometric exponents centred around an adult weight of 70 kg. CONCLUSION: Lisinopril dose and regimen adjustments for paediatric patients should include eGFR on top of weight adjustments. An expanded model characterizing the pharmacodynamic effect is required to identify the optimal dose and dosing regimen.

A Novel Strategy for the Discovery of Drug Targets: Integrating Clinical Evidence with Molecular Studies.

The mechanisms of several drugs remain unclear, limiting our understanding of how they exert their effects. Receptor affinities have not been comprehensively measured during drug development, and the safety investigations in humans are limited. Therefore, numerous unknown adverse and beneficial effects of drugs in humans persist. In this review, I highlight our achievements in identifying the unexpected beneficial effects of drugs through the analysis of real-world clinical data, which can contribute to drug repositioning and target finding. (1) Through the analysis of real-world data, we found that the anti-arrhythmic amiodarone induced interstitial lung disease, leading to fibrosis. Surprisingly, concurrent use of an anti-thrombin drug, dabigatran mitigated these adverse events. Pharmacological studies using animal models have mimicked this phenomenon and revealed the molecular mechanisms associated with the platelet-derived growth factor-alpha receptors. (2) The antidiabetic dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors increased the risk of an autoimmune disease, bullous pemphigoid, which was reduced by the concomitant use of lisinopril. Pharmacological studies using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells have revealed that lisinopril suppressed the skin disorders by inhibiting the expression of cutaneous matrix metalloproteinase 9 in macrophages. (3) The antimicrobial fluoroquinolones increased the risk of tendinopathy, which was reduced by the concomitant use of dexamethasone. However, clinical guidelines have suggested that corticosteroid increases the risk of tendinopathy. Our investigation demonstrated that fluoroquinolones impaired tendon cells through DNA damage by generating reactive oxygen species. In contrast, dexamethasone exhibited an acute beneficial effect on tendon tissue by upregulating the expression of a radical scavenger, glutathione peroxidase 3.

Captopril to Lisinopril Conversion in Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients Less Than 7 Years of Age (RISE-7).

Hypertension after cardiothoracic surgery is common, often requiring pharmacologic management. The recommended first-line antihypertensives in pediatrics are angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Captopril and enalapril are approved for infants and children; however, lisinopril is only approved for > 7 years of age. This study evaluated safety and efficacy of converting from captopril to lisinopril in patients utilizing a pre-defined conversion of 3 mg captopril to 1 mg lisinopril. This was a single center, retrospective study including patients less than 7 years of age admitted for cardiothoracic surgery who received both captopril and lisinopril from 01/01/2017 to 06/01/2022.The primary outcome was mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline for 72 h after conversion of captopril to lisinopril. A total of 99 patients were enrolled. There was a significant decrease in mean SBP (99.12 mmHg vs 94.86 mmHg; p = 0.007) with no difference in DBP (59.23 mmHg vs 61.95 mmHg; p = 0.07) after conversion to lisinopril. Of the 99 patients who were transitioned to lisinopril, 79 (80%) had controlled SBP, 20 (20%) remained hypertensive, 13 (13%) received an increase in their lisinopril dose, and 2 (2%) required an additional antihypertensive agent. There was a low overall rate of AKI (3%) and hyperkalemia (4%) respectively. This study demonstrates that utilizing lisinopril with a conversion rate of 3 mg of captopril to 1 mg of lisinopril was safe and effective for controlling hypertension in pediatric patients following cardiothoracic surgery.

[Modern Fixed Combinations in the Correction of Arterial Hypertension and Dyslipidemia].

Based on a clinical case report, the article shows the individual selection of effective therapy for a patient with arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia. Taking into account the risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, Equamer® was selected as a fixed combination of amlodipine + lisinopril + rosuvastatin capsules 10 mg+20 mg+10 mg (Gedeon Richter Plc, Budapest, Hungary). In the patient with hypertension, ischemic heart disease was verified, and stenting of the anterior descending artery was performed. According to the clinical guidelines, when arterial hypertension is associated with ischemic heart disease, the drug therapy of choice should be a combination of dihydropyridine slow calcium channel blockers with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. The fixed triple combination of amlodipine, lisinopril, and rosuvastatin is one of the most appropriate in this clinical situation; this combination targets the two major risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia.

Oral combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril vs nifedipine for postpartum hypertension: a comparative-effectiveness pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics may be underutilized for postpartum hypertension because of their teratogenicity during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether combined oral hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy produced superior short-term blood pressure control when compared with nifedipine among postpartum individuals with hypertension requiring pharmacologic treatment. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial (October 2021 to June 2022) that included individuals with chronic hypertension or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with 2 systolic blood pressure measurements ≥150 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure measurements ≥100 mm Hg within 72 hours after delivery. Participants were randomized to receive either combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy or nifedipine therapy after stratifying the participants by diagnosis (chronic hypertension vs hypertensive disorders of pregnancy). The primary outcome was stage 2 hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg) determined using a home blood pressure monitor on days 7 to 10 after delivery or at readmission to the hospital for blood pressure control. The secondary outcomes included severe maternal morbidity (any of the following: intensive care unit admission; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count syndrome; eclampsia; stroke; cardiomyopathy; or maternal death), need for intravenous medications after randomization, hospital length of stay, blood pressure during first clinic visit, medication compliance, and adverse events. A pilot trial with 70 individuals was planned given the limited available data on combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy use in postpartum care. We calculated relative risks and 95% credible intervals in an intention-to-treat analysis. Finally, we conducted a preplanned Bayesian analysis to estimate the probability of benefit or harm with a neutral informative prior. RESULTS: Of 111 eligible individuals, 70 (63%) agreed and were randomized (31 in the hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril group and 36 in the nifedipine group; 3 withdrew consent after randomization), and the characteristics were similar at baseline between the groups. The primary outcome was unavailable for 9 (12.8%) participants. The primary outcome occurred in 27% of participants in the hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril group and in 43% of the participants in the nifedipine group (posterior adjusted relative risk, 0.74; 95% credible interval, 0.40-1.31). Bayesian analysis indicated an 85% posterior probability of a reduction in the primary outcome with combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy relative to nifedipine treatment. No differences were noted in the secondary outcomes or adverse medication events. CONCLUSION: The results of the pilot trial suggest a high probability that combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy produces superior short-term BP control when compared with nifedipine. These findings should be confirmed in a larger trial.

Closing the gap - development of an analytical methodology using volumetric absorptive microsampling of finger prick blood followed by LC-HRMS/MS for adherence monitoring of antihypertensive drugs.

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), an emerging microsampling technique, is a promising tool for adherence monitoring. This study focused on development of an analytical methodology to improve VAMS-based strategies for adherence assessment by analyzing angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, loop diuretics, a potassium-sparing diuretic, and a thiazide diuretic. Development included sample preparation, chromatographic conditions, mass spectrometry settings, validation, and demonstrating proof of concept. Quantification of analytes, by name furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril, torasemide, and the active metabolites, canrenone, enalaprilat, and ramiprilat in finger prick blood (FPB), was validated based on international guidelines. Selectivity, carryover, and within/between-run accuracy and precision were in accordance with the recommendations. The matrix effect was evaluated at three different hematocrit levels (HT: 20%, 40%, 60%) and the coefficients of variation did not exceed 15%. Dilution integrity (1:10 and 1:20) was given for all analytes except lisinopril, yet for lisinopril, the therapeutic range was already covered by the calibration range. Long-term stability in VAMS tips was tested for 2 weeks at 24 °C in the dark and revealed no degradation of analytes. The proof of concept was performed by analyzing 35 intakes of ACE-inhibitors and diuretics in 18 VAMS and matched plasma samples. Hereby, determined concentration in FPB and plasma cannot be used interchangeably, and thus specific reference ranges for whole blood must be established. Nevertheless, the VAMS-based strategy was shown to be suitable for assessing adherence of all classes of antihypertensive drugs used in the guidelines to manage hypertension.

Interventions for chronic kidney disease in people with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD), one of the commonest severe monogenic disorders, is caused by the inheritance of two abnormal haemoglobin (beta-globin) genes. SCD can cause severe pain, significant end-organ damage, pulmonary complications, and premature death. Kidney disease is a frequent and potentially severe complication in people with SCD. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as abnormalities of kidney structure or function present for more than three months. Sickle cell nephropathy refers to the spectrum of kidney complications in SCD. Glomerular damage is a cause of microalbuminuria and can develop at an early age in children with SCD, with increased prevalence in adulthood. In people with sickle cell nephropathy, outcomes are poor as a result of the progression to proteinuria and chronic kidney insufficiency. Up to 12% of people who develop sickle cell nephropathy will develop end-stage renal disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2017. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of any intervention for preventing or reducing kidney complications or chronic kidney disease in people with sickle cell disease. Possible interventions include red blood cell transfusions, hydroxyurea, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), either alone or in combination. SEARCH METHODS: We searched for relevant trials in the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, seven other databases, and two other trials registers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interventions to prevent or reduce kidney complications or CKD in people with SCD. We applied no restrictions related to outcomes examined, language, or publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias, and assessed the certainty of the evidence (GRADE). MAIN RESULTS: We included three RCTs with 385 participants. We rated the certainty of the evidence as low to very low across different outcomes according to GRADE methodology, downgrading for risk of bias concerns, indirectness, and imprecision. Hydroxyurea versus placebo One RCT published in 2011 compared hydroxyurea to placebo in 193 children aged nine to 18 months. We are unsure if hydroxyurea compared to placebo reduces or prevents progression of kidney disease assessed by change in glomerular filtration rate (mean difference (MD) 0.58 mL/min /1.73 m2, 95% confidence interval (CI) -14.60 to 15.76; 142 participants; very low certainty). Hydroxyurea compared to placebo may improve the ability to concentrate urine (MD 42.23 mOsm/kg, 95% CI 12.14 to 72.32; 178 participants; low certainty), and may make little or no difference to SCD-related serious adverse events, including acute chest syndrome (risk ratio (RR) 0.39, 99% CI 0.13 to 1.16; 193 participants; low certainty), painful crisis (RR 0.68, 99% CI 0.45 to 1.02; 193 participants; low certainty); and hospitalisations (RR 0.83, 99% CI 0.68 to 1.01; 193 participants; low certainty). No deaths occurred in either trial arm and the RCT did not report quality of life. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus placebo One RCT published in 1998 compared an ACEI (captopril) to placebo in 22 adults with normal blood pressure and microalbuminuria. We are unsure if captopril compared to placebo reduces proteinuria (MD -49.00 mg/day, 95% CI -124.10 to 26.10; 22 participants; very low certainty). We are unsure if captopril reduces or prevents kidney disease as measured by creatinine clearance; the trial authors stated that creatinine clearance remained constant over six months in both groups, but provided no comparative data (very low certainty). The RCT did not report serious adverse events, all-cause mortality, or quality of life. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus vitamin C One RCT published in 2020 compared an ACEI (lisinopril) with vitamin C in 170 children aged one to 18 years with normal blood pressure and microalbuminuria. It reported no data we could analyse. We are unsure if lisinopril compared to vitamin C reduces proteinuria in this population: the large drop in microalbuminuria in both arms of the trial after only one month on treatment may have been due to an overestimation of microalbuminuria at baseline rather than a true effect. The RCT did not report serious adverse events, all-cause mortality, or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are unsure if hydroxyurea improves glomerular filtration rate or reduces hyperfiltration in children aged nine to 18 months, but it may improve their ability to concentrate urine and may make little or no difference to the incidence of acute chest syndrome, painful crises, and hospitalisations. We are unsure if ACEI compared to placebo has any effect on preventing or reducing kidney complications in adults with normal blood pressure and microalbuminuria. We are unsure if ACEI compared to vitamin C has any effect on preventing or reducing kidney complications in children with normal blood pressure and microalbuminuria. No RCTs assessed red blood cell transfusions or any combined interventions to prevent or reduce kidney complications. Due to lack of evidence, we cannot comment on the management of children aged over 18 months or adults with any known genotype of SCD. We have identified a lack of adequately designed and powered studies, although we found four ongoing trials since the last version of this review. Only one ongoing trial addresses renal function as a primary outcome in the short term, but such interventions have long-term effects. Trials of hydroxyurea, ACEIs or red blood cell transfusion in older children and adults are urgently needed to determine any effect on prevention or reduction of kidney complications in people with SCD.

Use of Naloxone in Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Overdose: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor overdose is an uncommonly presenting toxicologic emergency. Management is primarily supportive care, but a small body of evidence exists to support naloxone for management of hypotension. CASE REPORT: We present a case of accidental ACE inhibitor overdose. The patient took approximately 300 mg lisinopril over 48 h and presented for evaluation of syncope. He was hypotensive and unresponsive to fluids. We administered naloxone with immediate and sustained resolution in hypotension. The mechanism of action is briefly discussed. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY MEDICINE PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Naloxone is a rapid, low-risk, low-cost, and effective intervention for hypotension due to ACE inhibitor toxicity. It is supported by basic science research and clinical experience.

Heterogeneity in Blood Pressure Response to 4 Antihypertensive Drugs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Hypertension is the leading risk factor for premature death worldwide. Multiple blood pressure-lowering therapies are available but the potential for maximizing benefit by personalized targeting of drug classes is unknown. Objective: To investigate and quantify the potential for targeting specific drugs to specific individuals to maximize blood pressure effects. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, double-blind, repeated crossover trial in men and women with grade 1 hypertension at low risk for cardiovascular events at an outpatient research clinic in Sweden. Mixed-effects models were used to assess the extent to which individuals responded better to one treatment than another and to estimate the additional blood pressure lowering achievable by personalized treatment. Interventions: Each participant was scheduled for treatment in random order with 4 different classes of blood pressure-lowering drugs (lisinopril [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor], candesartan [angiotensin-receptor blocker], hydrochlorothiazide [thiazide], and amlodipine [calcium channel blocker]), with repeated treatments for 2 classes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ambulatory daytime systolic blood pressure, measured at the end of each treatment period. Results: There were 1468 completed treatment periods (median length, 56 days) recorded in 270 of the 280 randomized participants (54% men; mean age, 64 years). The blood pressure response to different treatments varied considerably between individuals (P < .001), specifically for the choices of lisinopril vs hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril vs amlodipine, candesartan vs hydrochlorothiazide, and candesartan vs amlodipine. Large differences were excluded for the choices of lisinopril vs candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide vs amlodipine. On average, personalized treatment had the potential to provide an additional 4.4 mm Hg-lower systolic blood pressure. Conclusions and Relevance: These data reveal substantial heterogeneity in blood pressure response to drug therapy for hypertension, findings that may have implications for personalized therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02774460.

Therapeutic drug monitoring for lisinopril in rats using dried blood spots.

A unique, easy, precise and exact high-performance liquid chromatographic-mass tandem (LCMS/MS) approach was created and validated for the measurement of the antihypertensive medicine Lisinopril (LIS) in dried blood spots (DBS). This was the first time according to our knowledge that LIS is being validated in DBS. Liquid chromatography mass tandem was utilized using the Water Acquity column as UPLC -HSS T3® column. Ten millimole ammonium formate, 0.2 percent formic acid, 0.2 percent trimethylamine, one percent acetonitrile (pH 3.0± 0.02) used as mobile phase (A) and a mobile phase (B) consisting of 0.2 percent formic acid in acetonitrile. The mobile phase lasts for 2.5 minutes at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. For the drug as well internal standard, the retention times (RT) obtained under optimal circumstances were 0.63±0.02 and 2.18±0.03 min, dried blood spot samples, offering consistent and quantitative drug recovery. The process was the shortest RT reported for the LIS, it is a linear relationship with concentrations from 10 - to 100ng/ml. A protein precipitation approach was used to measure the LIS. The method used to analyze DBS samples from rats receiving LIS.

THE NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION IN BETA BLOCKERS (BISOPROLOL/METOPROLOL), ACE INHIBITORS (LISINOPRIL/PERINDOPRIL), THIAZIDES DIURETICS (HCT), CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS (AMLODIPINE/FELODIPINE), SARTANS (CANDESARTAN) AND ТHE SUBSEQUENT SKIN CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION: APOCALYPSE NOW.

The problem of contamination of the most commonly used medicines with nitrosamines is worsening worldwide. According to recent literature data, this "contamination" is the cause not only of skin cancer (keratinocytic/melanoma) but also of gastrointestinal neoplasms, brain tumours, neuroblastoma, rectal carcinoma, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and many others. It is these clinical manifestations that are associated with/ or already directly linked to the nitrosamine content of drugs and food products used by patients in previous periods. And it is this permissive availability/contamination that could prove to be the most likely, powerful inducer of acquired mutations underlying the worldwide cancer pandemic. Of further concern is the evidence of contamination of newer classes of medications by nitrosamines- namely: beta blockers, calcium antagonists and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In practice, mankind faces the problem of certainly over 1 billion patients taking nitrosamine-contaminated drugs: 280 million patients with depression (antidepressants), over 1 billion patients with arterial hypertension (antihypertensive drugs), over half a billion patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (oral antidiabetic drugs/metformin/ sitagliptin), over 4 billion patients with gastritis (ranitidine), over 5 million with tuberculosis (rifampicin), and probably a number of others. The calculations are apocalyptic, since even if only 20-30% of the groups were affected, the number of patients taking these drugs would, by a rough calculation, currently amount to over 1 billion. And there are certainly other classes of drugs yet to be announced. It is for this reason that we should not be surprised that the data on the development of keratinocyte cancer after intake of nitrosamine-contaminated preparations is growing at a breakneck pace. This data indirectly but strongly confirms the importance of a newly introduced concept in the medical science : Nitrosogenesis of skin cancer. A concept, until recently unknown, incomprehensible, but at the same time frightening and gradually accepted, imposing itself and which with each passing day is gaining more and more scientific significance and "visibility", "scientific tangibility, receptivity, and acceptability." This article presents, for the first time in the world literature, patients who developed single/multiple forms of keratinocytic cancer (partly in combination with melanoma precursors-dysplastic moles) after administration of two new classes of potentially nitrosamine-contaminated antihypertensive drugs: beta blockers (bisoprolol, metoprolol) and calcium antagonists (amlodipine, felodipine). For the first time in the scientific literature, the contributory pro-carcinogenic role of another potentially nitrosamine-contaminated ACE inhibitor- lisinopril , as well as that of candesartan: in the development of keratinocytic cancer is also discussed. For the first time in the world literature, the conclusion regarding the pathogenetic relationship between the intake of potentially contaminated drugs (from different drug groups) and cancer development is based on the model of the equivalent clinical manifestation of skin tumors (rather than on controlled long-term prospective analyses). Nitrosamine contamination in these drug groups appears to be the sole and major unifying factor or causative agent for these manifestations.

MANAGEMENT OF RISKS OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS ACCORDING TO ADR REPORT FORM DATA FROM LVIV REGION HEALTHCARE FACILITIES IN 2022.

The study aimed to analyse the adverse drug reactions report form data received by the State Expert Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine from healthcare professionals in the Lviv region in 2022. Regarding specific types of medicines, the ones with proven cause-and-effect relationships that caused the highest frequency of adverse drug reactions incidents were chemotherapeutic agents (35.5%), medicines affecting the cardiovascular system (20.3%), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (8%). Within the penicillin class, amoxicillin potentiated by clavulanate (67%) and amoxicillin (29%) were the dominant drugs showing the highest incidence rate of adverse reactions. Among cephalosporins, ceftriaxone (46%) and cefixime (15%) were found to take the lead in terms of adverse reaction frequency. The highest proportion among all adverse drug reactions caused by penicillins and cephalosporins was attributed to allergic reactions. To confirm or rule out immediate or delayed type allergies in patients, as well as in patients with a history of immediate-type allergic reactions to ß-lactams and planned administration of another ß-lactam, it is necessary to conduct skin testing (skin prick test, or, in the case of parenteral administration, intradermal test) with the planned ß-lactam antibiotic. The second highest proportion of induced adverse drug reactions was attributed to drugs affecting the cardiovascular system (20.3%). The leading medications in the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors category were enalapril (47%) and the combination of lisinopril with hydrochlorothiazide (24%). In the angiotensin II receptor blockers category of medications, valsartan (30%) and telmisartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination (20%) ranked highest. In the category of CCB drugs, amlodipine (66%) and nifedipine (20%) held the leading positions. among angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, enalapril caused the most prevalent and predicted adverse reaction, that of cough, affecting 10.5% of patients, whereas, with the combination therapy of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide, the cough was observed in only 5.2% of patients. Angiotensin II receptor blockers have a better safety profile, particularly concerning cough. Analysis of adverse drug reactions reports for angiotensin II receptor blockers showed no cases of cough with valsartan and telmisartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination. Among calcium channel blocker medications, amlodipine emerged to rank highest, causing one of the predicted adverse drug reactions, that of lower extremity oedema in 64% of patients. The second position was taken by the combination of amlodipine with valsartan, which showed a statistically significant reduction of 14.3% (p≤0.05) in the incidence of oedema. Using amlodipine at a dose of 5 mg in combination with sartan medicines as angiotensin receptor blockers is an effective therapeutic alternative not only for enhancing blood pressure control in hypertensive patients but also for improving the safety profile of amlodipine. Among all the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prescribed to patients in the Lviv region in 2022, the highest number of adverse reactions was associated with the administration of diclofenac, ibuprofen, paracetamol, and nimesulide, causing adverse drug reactions in 22%, 19%, 17%, and 10% of cases, respectively. The most common systemic manifestations of adverse reactions with these non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were allergic reactions (63.4%) and gastrointestinal disorders (26.8%). From an evidence-based medicine perspective, the most justified approach for primary and secondary prevention of gastrointestinal complications is the use of proton pump inhibitors.

The ACE Inhibitor Lisinopril Stimulates Melanoma Cell Invasiveness by Inducing MMP2 Secretion.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hypertension is treated primarily with angiotensin II (ATII) receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEIs). Both ATII and ACEIs can trigger signal transduction via ACE, and a possible correlation between ARB/ACEI therapy and an increased risk of cancer is highly controversial. The question of whether or not ACE as a potential signal transducer affects human melanoma (MV3) cell behavior prompted the present study. METHODS: Expression of ACE, ATII receptor types 1, 2 (AT1R, AT2R), COX2 and MMP2 in MV3 cells was examined by qPCR. AT1R, AT2R and ACE were inhibited with losartan, EMA401 and lisinopril, respectively. Adhesion, migration and invasiveness of MV3 cells seeded on a hepatocyte (Huh7) monolayer or a reconstituted collagen type I matrix were analyzed using video microscopy and Boyden chambers. Integrity of the Huh7 cell layer was confirmed by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER). ERK1/2 phosphorylation and MMP2 secretion were evaluated by Western blotting. MMP2 activity was inhibited with ARP-100. RESULTS: Losartan, EMA401 and lisinopril stimulated MV3 melanoma cell migration and invasion in a coculture model with Huh7 cells while leaving proliferation and adhesion largely unaffected. The drugs did not interfere with TEER of the hepatocyte monolayer nor with MV3 cell proliferation, but tended to increase the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and the expression of both COX2 and MMP2. Lisinopril caused a significant increase in MV3 cells' MMP2 secretion and an accelerated MV3 cell-mediated TEER breakdown. The MMP2 inhibitor ARP-100 could antagonize the lisinopril-stimulated invasion of the hepatocyte layer. CONCLUSION: Lisinopril stimulates MV3 cell invasion by increasing the expression and secretion of MMP2.

Choice of antihypertensive agent in isolated systolic hypertension and isolated diastolic hypertension: A secondary analysis of the ALLHAT trial.

Despite broad treatment recommendations, there are limited published reports comparing the efficacy of different antihypertensive agents in patients with isolated systolic hypertension or isolated diastolic hypertension. This study was a secondary analysis of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. We compared the use of chlorthalidone, amlodipine, or lisinopril on the primary outcome of combined coronary heart disease, stroke, or all-cause mortality in patients with isolated systolic hypertension or isolated diastolic hypertension.

Underreported Risk of Lisinopril-Induced Angioedema in a Veteran Population.

BACKGROUND: Lisinopril-induced angioedema (LIA) is a rare but serious adverse drug event (ADE) with a published incidence of 0.1% to 0.7%. It is well known that ADEs are widely underreported; however, LIA is one of the most reported ADEs within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of underreporting on the risk of LIA within VHA. METHODS: The reported risk of LIA was calculated from reports submitted to the Veterans Affairs (VA) Adverse Drug Event Reporting System (VA ADERS) and the number of veterans prescribed lisinopril. To estimate underreporting, local chart review identified cases of LIA that were compared to reports submitted. The underreporting rate was then applied to the national reported risk. RESULTS: Locally, 68 reports of LIA were submitted of the 21 262 patients prescribed lisinopril, for a reported risk of 0.32%. Nationwide, 14 289 reports of LIA were submitted of the 3 109 661 patients prescribed lisinopril, for a crude reported risk of 0.46%. Of the 324 patients identified for chart review, 240 patients were diagnosed with LIA, suggesting that at least 71.7% of cases were unreported. When this underreporting rate is extrapolated to the national reported risk, a better estimate of the risk of LIA within VHA could increase to 1.6%. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: When estimating the effect of underreporting, the risk of LIA increases to approximately 1.6% or 1 in 63 patients. Because this ADE may affect more patients than previously understood, providers may wish to take LIA into consideration when prescribing lisinopril.

Antihypertensive medicine use differs between Ghana and Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases are a growing burden in many African countries; cardiovascular disease is the main disease. Antihypertensive medicines (AHM) are a common treatment option but we know little about community use in most low- and medium-income countries (LMIC). We aimed to describe the use of antihypertensive medicines (AHM) in Ghana and Nigeria using a novel data source. METHODS: We used data from mPharma-a health and pharmaceutical company which distributes pharmaceuticals to hospital and retail pharmacies. We extracted data using the anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification codes and calculated use in defined daily doses and explored patterns by class, medicines, dose, and originator or generic product. RESULTS: AHM use differed between Ghana and Nigeria. The most used classes in Ghana were angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) followed by calcium channel blockers (CCB) and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). The five most used products were 16 mg candesartan, 30 mg nifedipine, 10 mg lisinopril, 5 mg amlodipine and 50 mg losartan. In Nigeria ARB, CCB and diuretics were widely used; the top five products were 50 mg losartan, 10 mg lisinopril, 30 mg nifedipine, 40 mg furosemide, and 5 mg amlodipine. More originator products were used in Ghana than Nigeria. CONCLUSION: The differences between Ghana and Nigeria may result from a combination of medical, contextual and policy evidence and reflect factors related to clinical guidance (e.g. standard treatment guidelines), accessibility to prescribers and the role of community pharmacies, and structure of the health system and universal health coverage including funding for medicines. We show the feasibility of using novel data sources to gain insights on medicines use in the community.

Case report of a phencyclidine false positive due to lamotrigine use with confirmatory testing.

BACKGROUND: Urine toxicology screens are useful in diagnosing patients who present with acute psychosis with a history of substance abuse. Being aware of potential false positive reactants is paramount in diagnostic accuracy. Currently, lamotrigine is not listed among common cross-reactants with phencyclidine (PCP). CASE REPORT: A 49 year old male (98 kg) was brought to the ED by a family member for worsening confusion and agitation. He had a history of Bipolar I, PTSD, schizoaffective disorder, hypertension, and cannabis/opioid abuse. His home medications included paliperidone, duloxetine, lamotrigine, tizanidine, hydroxyzine, and lisinopril. Upon examination, he denied intentional overdose or illicit substances, but largely mumbled incoherently. Blood pressure was 140/90 mmHg, pulse 113. A urine toxicology screen was positive for PCP and cannabinoids. Other labs were unremarkable, co-ingestants negative. By day three, his mental status vacillated but he largely gave unintelligible responses. Given the short half-life of PCP, false positives were investigated. A confirmatory blood test (collected upon admission) for PCP was found to be negative, and a serum lamotrigine level was confirmed to be positive (1.5µg/ml). Once more lucid, the patient admitted to taking large quantities of mirtazapine and tizanidine, making serotonin syndrome the more likely diagnosis. DISCUSSION: There is little in the medical literature describing cross-reactivity of lamotrigine and PCP on urine drug screens. This can be especially difficult to deduce in a known drug abuser who presents psychotic and non-contributory in their work up.

Conservative therapy is associated with worse clinical features and biochemical derangements than renal replacement therapy: a retrospective study in Kumasi, Ghana.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of end stage kidney disease (ESKD) is increasing in Ghana as with the rest of the world. This study compared the sociodemographic, diagnostic characteristics (clinical, biochemical and imaging) and clinical outcomes of ESKD patients who chose either renal replacement therapy (RRT) or conservative therapy as well as the factors that influenced their choice. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 382 ESKD patient from 2006 to 2018. The data was collected from the Nephrology Clinic at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH). Sociodemographic, diagnostic (clinical, biochemical and imaging) and therapeutic data were obtained, organized and analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). RESULTS: Of the 382 patients, 321 had conservative therapy whiles 61 had renal replacement therapy. The mean age of participants was 47.71 ± 16.10 years. Bipedal swelling (16.8%), fatigue (10.4%) and facial swelling (9.2%) were the major clinical features. Chronic glomerulonephritis (31.4%), hypertension (30.3%) and diabetes mellitus nephropathy (28.2%) were the most frequent predisposing conditions. Nifedipine (82.0%), bisoprolol (32.8%), aspirin (19.7%), ranitidine (26.2%), metformin (13.1%) and lasix (78.7%) were commonly used by the RRT patients than their conservative therapy counterparts. Compared to their RRT counterparts, patients on conservative therapy were more on irbesartan/lisinopril (57.9%) and sodium hydro carbonate (NaHCO3) (52.0%). Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (p = 0.047), uremic gastritis (p = 0.007), anaemia, uraemia, haematuria and hyperkalaemia (p < 0.001) were more common in conservative therapy patients than RRT patients with RRT patients showing better corticomedullary differentiation (38.1% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.001) and normal echotexture (15.0% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.005). Age, gender, occupation and duration of illness were significantly associated with the decision to opt for conservative therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients on conservative therapy have worse clinical outcomes than their RRT counterparts. Early referrals to nephrologist as well as subsidized RRT should be targeted.

Intestinal absorption pathways of lisinopril: Mechanistic investigations.

Lisinopril is an antihypertensive drug with poor intestinal permeability. Enhancement of intestinal absorption depends on a clear understanding of the permeation pathways and absorption mechanisms. Unfortunately, these are not fully elucidated for lisinopril. Accordingly, the aim was to determine lisinopril permeation pathways and obstacles limiting membrane transport with subsequent nomination of appropriate permeation enhancers. This employed an in situ rabbit intestinal perfusion technique, which revealed site-dependent absorptive clearance (PeA/L) from a lisinopril simple solution (5 µg/ml), with paracellular absorption playing a role. Regional drug permeability ranked as colon> duodenum> jejunum> ileum opposing intestinal expression rank of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux transporters. Duodenal and jejunal perfusion of a higher lisinopril concentration (50 µg/ml) reflected saturable absorption, suggesting carrier-mediated transport. The effect of piperine and verapamil as P-gp inhibitors on intestinal absorption of lisinopril was investigated. Coperfusion with either piperine or verapamil significantly enhanced lisinopril absorption, with enhancement being dominant in the ileum segment. This supported the contribution of P-gp transporters to poor lisinopril permeability. On the other hand, coperfusion of lisinopril with zinc acetate dihydrate significantly multiplied lisinopril PeA/L by 2.3- and 6.6-fold in duodenum and ileum segments, respectively, through magnifying intestinal water flux. The study explored the barriers limiting lisinopril intestinal absorption. Moreover, the study exposed clinically relevant lisinopril interactions with common coadministered cargos that should be considered for an appropriate lisinopril regimen. However, this requires further in vivo verification.