Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 184
Filtrar
1.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(5): 771-785, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38175324

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL), which causes ankle, leg, and feet swelling, poses a significant challenge for endometrial cancer survivors, impacting physical functioning and psychological well-being. Inconsistent LEL diagnostic methods result in wide-ranging LEL incidence estimates. METHODS: We calculated the cumulative incidence of LEL based on survivor-reported Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) responses in addition to survivor- and nurse-reported leg circumference measurements among a pilot sample of 50 endometrial cancer survivors (27 White, 23 Black) enrolled in the ongoing population-based Carolina Endometrial Cancer Study. RESULTS: Self-leg circumference measurements were perceived to be difficult and were completed by only 17 survivors. Diagnostic accuracy testing measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) compared the standard nurse-measured ≥ 10% difference in leg circumference measurements to GCLQ responses. At a mean of ~11 months post-diagnosis, 54% of survivors met established criteria for LEL based on ≥ 4 GCLQ cutpoint while 24% had LEL based on nurse-measurement. Percent agreement, sensitivity, and specificity approximated 60% at a threshold of ≥ 5 GCLQ symptoms. However, Cohen's kappa, a measure of reliability that corrects for agreement by chance, was highest at ≥ 4 GCLQ symptoms (κ = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the need for high quality measurements of LEL that are feasible for epidemiologic study designs among endometrial cancer survivors. Future studies should use patient-reported survey measures to assess lymphedema burden and quality of life outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias Endometriales , Linfedema , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Endometriales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfedema/etiología , Linfedema/epidemiología , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/psicología , Anciano , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Adulto , Incidencia
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 184: 150-159, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38309033

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate whether intensive follow-up (INT) after surgery for endometrial cancer impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and healthcare costs compared to minimalist follow-up (MIN), in the absence of evidence supporting any benefit on 5-year overall survival. METHODS: In the TOTEM trial, HRQoL was assessed using the SF-12 and the Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) questionnaires at baseline, after 6 and 12 months and then annually up to 5 years of follow-up. Costs were analyzed after 4 years of follow-up from a National Health Service perspective, stratified by risk level. The probability of missing data was analyzed for both endpoints. RESULTS: 1847 patients were included in the analyses. The probability of missing data was not influenced by the study arms (MIN vs INT OR: 0.97 95%CI: 0.87-1.08). Longitudinal changes in HRQoL scores did not differ between the two follow-up regimens (MIN vs INT SF-12 PCS: -0.573, CI95%: -1.31; 0.16; SF-12 MCS: -0.243, CI95%: -1.08; 0.59; PGWB: -0.057, CI95%: -0,88; 0,77). The mean cost difference between the intensive and minimalist arm was €531 for low-risk patients and €683 for high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: In the follow-up of endometrial cancer after surgery, a minimalist treatment regimen did not affect quality of life and was cost-saving in both low-risk and high-risk recurrence patients. As previous results showed no survival benefit, a minimalist approach is justified. The relevant proportion of missing data on secondary outcomes of interest could be a critical point that deserves special attention.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Endometriales/economía , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Anciano , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 180: 160-167, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38091776

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To identify endometrial cancer survivors' (ECS) barriers and facilitators for participation in lifestyle interventions to improve their dietary and exercise behaviors. Our secondary objective is to determine baseline information: physical activity level, quality of life (QoL), and impact of COVID-19 on exercise, diet, and mental health. METHODS: Obese, early-stage ECS participated in 2-part mixed-methods data collection; Part 1: survey gathering sample characteristics, QoL, exercise, and basic endometrial cancer- related knowledge. Part 2: virtual focus group or individual interviews using a brainwriting premortem protocol. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS (version 8.3). Qualitative data were analyzed using deductive thematic coding guided by the RE-AIM framework. RESULTS: Twenty percent (70/358) of ECS from a survivorship database and clinic recruitment completed the survey; 16 ECS provided qualitative feedback. Common barriers to intervention participation included time and resource costs, meeting frequency, and pessimism about weight loss maintenance. Facilitators included an opportunity to connect with other survivors and a focus on health rather than weight loss. Most ECS could not identify exercise guidelines (60%) and 83% were not meeting these guidelines. Higher BMI was correlated with a lower confidence in completing in moderate physical activity (p-value = 0.0206). Post-COVID-19 pandemic, physical activity, nutritional decisions, and/or mental health worsened for 67% of ECS. CONCLUSION: ECS are a disparate population, with worsening behaviors and mental health following the pandemic. The identified ECS-specific barriers and facilitators to behavioral intervention participation are being used to simultaneously improve the reach of and adherence to a lifestyle intervention aimed at improving their health and QoL.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Endometriales , Femenino , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Supervivencia , Pandemias , Estilo de Vida , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Pérdida de Peso , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control
4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 185: 68-74, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368815

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) is an essential component of curative intent treatment for many patients with endometrial cancer. The prevalence of trauma history in this population is unknown and important to understand considering VBT requires patients to have an instrument vaginally inserted while in the vulnerable lithotomy position. We aim to identify patients treated with intracavitary VBT and collect survey data to assess trauma endpoints. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with endometrial cancer who underwent intracavitary VBT at our institution between 01/2017 and 08/2022. Patients were mailed and/or electronically mailed a survey that included demographics, psychosocial background, and validated trauma surveys to be filled out as they relate to their trauma experiences prior to VBT and again considering any trauma symptomatology related to VBT. Electronic medical record review was performed. Descriptive statistics as well as multivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: 206 patients met inclusion criteria, 66 (32.1%) of whom returned the survey and were included for analysis. Thirty-two percent of patients self-reported a personal history of any prior mental health diagnosis. Eighty-eight percent of patients screened positive for a history of trauma exposure, 23% endorsed symptoms of PTSD related to their VBT experience, and 5% screened positive for a likely PTSD diagnosis from VBT. CONCLUSION: A majority of included patients had a history of trauma exposure prior to VBT. In a subset of patients, VBT re-induced trauma and was considered to be an independent traumatic event. This study highlights the importance of practicing trauma informed care, particularly in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias Endometriales , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Endometriales/radioterapia , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Prevalencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Adulto , Vagina/efectos de la radiación , Vagina/lesiones
5.
Psychogeriatrics ; 24(4): 924-932, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endometrioid carcinoma, originating in the endometrium glandular cells, is often detected early and treated by surgery. However, post-treatment life quality remains poorly studied, explicitly focusing on sleep quality, fatigue, and depression. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, observational study, 147 female patients with endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma were evaluated using standardised tools-Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Patients were categorised based on sleep quality and depression levels. The study employed correlation and regression analyses to examine the relationships among these variables. RESULTS: No correlations were found between sociodemographic or lifestyle variables and sleep quality, fatigue, or depression (P > 0.05). A strong correlation was identified between PSQI and FAS (r = 0.623; P < 0.001), PSQI and BDI (r = 0.291; P < 0.001), and FAS and BDI (r = 0.413; P < 0.001). Fatigue and tumour grade were potential predictors of poor sleep. Sleep quality and depression predicted fatigue, while only fatigue was a predictor for depression. Radiotherapy and external radiation rates were notably higher in the mild depression group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests an imperative for integrated multi-disciplinary approaches that focus on medical and psychological aspects of patient care to enhance long-term well-being and quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Endometrioide , Depresión , Neoplasias Endometriales , Fatiga , Calidad de Vida , Calidad del Sueño , Humanos , Femenino , Fatiga/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Neoplasias Endometriales/complicaciones , Estudios Transversales , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Depresión/psicología , Anciano , Carcinoma Endometrioide/psicología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/cirugía , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/psicología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Sueño/fisiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Bienestar Psicológico
6.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 308(2): 515-525, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36694036

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore how patients treated for endometrial cancer (EC) with robotic surgery are affected in symptoms of anxiety and depression and HRQoL in the long term. METHODS: Women scheduled for primary robotic surgery for EC were included (n = 64), in this single-center study. Socioeconomic variables were obtained at baseline. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancers Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), its module for EC (EN24), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), and the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9) were followed prospectively from baseline to 2 weeks, 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: The number of patients scoring above the clinical threshold for anxiety decreased from 17 (27.0%) at baseline to 4 (7.0%) at 2 weeks (p = 0.012). Depressive symptoms were reported in 20% of patients at baseline and did not change significantly during the one-year follow-up (p = 0.58). A significant decrease in Global health status was seen at 2 weeks (from 69.8 to 62.7; p = 0.048), with return to baseline levels after 3 months (68.5; p = 0.32) and stable at 1 year. Unemployment, low income, and adjuvant therapy correlated with lower Global health status at 3 months. CONCLUSION: The significant proportion of patients with anxiety symptoms preoperatively reduced prompt after surgery, while the proportion with depression remained constant, indicating that the primary treatment has no long-term negative effect on patients' mental health. At 3 months, there is no obvious remaining negative impact on patients' HRQoL, and these results are consistent after 1 year.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Femenino , Calidad de Vida , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Gynecol Oncol ; 160(3): 811-816, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33454131

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Social support may reduce the amount of psychological distress and increase quality of life. This study assessed whether socio-demographic, personality, and clinical characteristics predict the level of perceived social support in patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer who participated in the ROGY Care study and completed the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support(MSPSS) 12 months after inclusion were eligible for this study (n=238). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictive value of socio-demographic characteristics, personality and clinical characteristics after initial treatment on the perceived level of social support after 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 238 patients (mean age 64.8 ± 9.4 years), 139 patients had endometrial cancer (58%) and 99 patients had ovarian cancer (42%). One year after inclusion, the level of perceived social support was high in 79% of all patients (n=189). Patients experiencing low level of perceived social support (n=49) less often had a partner (69% versus 83% in patients with high level of perceived social support; p=0.029), had a higher education level (24% versus 15% respectively; p=0.013) and a distressed (type D) personality was more common (40% versus 16% respectively; p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, a type D personality, characterized by negative affect and social inhibition, was the only independent predictor of a low level of perceived social support (OR 2.96; 95% CI 1.37-6.37; p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer, the level of perceived social support is mainly associated with a distressed (type D) personality. Those patients can be at risk of experiencing less social support. Future research is needed to assess whether they might benefit from additional support during cancer diagnosis and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Neoplasias Ováricas/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distrés Psicológico , Apoyo Social
8.
Gynecol Oncol ; 162(3): 770-777, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34140179

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of a personalized text-message-based intervention to increase weight loss among endometrial cancer survivors with obesity. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled trial, endometrial cancer survivors with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) were randomized to a personalized SMS text-message-based weight loss intervention or enhanced usual care. Primary outcome was weight loss at 6 months; secondary outcomes were weight loss at 12 months and changes in psychosocial measures. We also compared clinical characteristics and weight change between trial participants and non-participants. RESULTS: Between May 18 and December 31, 2017, 80 endometrial cancer survivors with obesity consented to participate in the randomized trial. There were no differences in clinical characteristics between the two arms. Weight changes were similar in the two arms (P = 0.08). At 6 months, no differences in quality of life, physical activity, or body image were noted. Of 358 eligible patients, 80 became trial participants and 278, non-participants. Trial participants were younger (59.3 vs. 63.4 years, P < 0.001), more likely non-white (P = 0.02), on fewer medications (4 vs. 7, P < 0.001), and had a higher median BMI (38.7 vs. 37.6 kg/m2, P = 0.01) than non-participants. Weight change was similar between participants and non-participants (P = 0.85). At 6 months, similar percentages of participants and non-participants (47.7% vs. 44.4%) had gained weight, and similar percentages (9.2% vs. 11.2%) had lost at least 5% of their body weight. CONCLUSIONS: This text-message-based intervention did not increase weight loss among endometrial cancer survivors with obesity, nor did participation in the trial. Other weight management interventions should be promoted to increase weight loss. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03169023.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Ejercicio Físico , Obesidad/dietoterapia , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
9.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 31(3): 339-344, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33177151

RESUMEN

Fertility-sparing management of early-stage gynecologic cancers is becoming more prevalent as increasing evidence demonstrates acceptable oncologic and reproductive outcomes in appropriately selected patients. However, in the absence of randomized controlled trials, most of the commonly used treatment algorithms are based only on observational studies. As women are increasingly postponing childbearing, the need for evidence-based guidance on the optimal selection of appropriate candidates for fertility-sparing therapies is paramount. It is imperative to seriously consider the fertility potential of a given individual prior to making major oncologic treatment decisions that may deviate from the accepted standard of care. It is a disservice to patients to undergo a fertility-sparing procedure in hopes of ultimately achieving a live birth, only to determine later they have poor baseline fertility potential or other substantial barriers to conception including excess financial toxicity. Many women with oncologic diagnoses are of advanced maternal age and their obstetric and neonatal risks must be considered. In the era of advanced assisted reproductive technologies, patients should be provided realistic expectations regarding success rates while understanding the potential oncologic perils. A multidisciplinary approach to the conservative treatment of early-stage gynecologic cancers with early referral to reproductive specialists as well as maternal-fetal medicine specialists is warranted. In this review, we discuss the recommended fertility evaluation for patients with newly diagnosed, early-stage gynecologic cancers who are considering fertility-sparing management.


Asunto(s)
Consejo , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Tratamiento Conservador , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad/psicología , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/psicología , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Embarazo , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/psicología , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/terapia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/psicología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia
10.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 304(3): 773-782, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33582853

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The impact of disease activity or treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQL) is crucial in Oncology, but adequate instruments for this assessment are scarce. Our aim is to validate the Mexican-Spanish version of the QLQ-EN24 questionnaire to evaluate HRQL in women with endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: This is a prospective study of Mexican women with EC, attending a single cancer centre, who responded the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-EN24 instruments; usual psychometric analysis were performed as well as the association of HRQL scales and relevant clinical data. Correlation analysis was performed with the Spearman's method, reliability analysis with the Cronbach's alpha, known-group comparisons with the Kruskal-Wallis test, and survival analysis with the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-nine women with EC were assessed. Most functional scales reported high values, and most symptom scales, low. Questionnaire compliance rates were high and internal consistency tests demonstrated adequate convergent and divergent validity. Cronbach's α coefficients of the five multi-item scales the QLQ-EN24 instruments were from 0.659 to 0.887. Scales of the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-EN24 instruments distinguished among clinically distinct groups of patients, particularly based on serum albumin levels. The Urological symptoms, Gastrointestinal symptoms, Body image, Pelvic pain and Taste change scales were significantly associated with OS. CONCLUSION: The Mexican-Spanish version of the QLQ-EN24 questionnaire is reliable and valid for the assessment of HRQL in patients with EC and can be broadly used in multi-national clinical trials. However, conclusions derived from scales evaluating sexual function should be handled carefully.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Lenguaje , México , Estudios Prospectivos , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
11.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 41(4): 621-625, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32811229

RESUMEN

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecologic malignancy in developed countries with increasing incidence worldwide. A total of 201 patients were enrolled and a cross-sectional study was performed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI) after the approval by an institutional review board (University of Health Sciences, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Turkey, March 13, 2019, Approval no. 2019/4-27). Morbidly obese patients (body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2) had lower physical functioning scores compared to non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2; p = .008) and non-morbidly obese patients (BMI < 40 kg/m2; p = .011). The overall sexual dysfunction rate was high (94.5%). No significant sexual function differences were observed among the study groups.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Previous efforts to assess the influence of obesity and BMI on endometrial cancer patient quality of life have indicated that obesity adversely affects physical function and the effects of obesity on sexual function remains vague. In addition, the influence of patient age, surgical approach, adjuvant therapy type and time after diagnosis on quality of life and sexual function have not been clearly defined.What do the results of this study add? Increased BMI is associated with impaired physical function in endometrial cancer patients. However, BMI does not appear to affect sexual function in this population.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? After endometrial cancer treatment, lifestyle interventions aimed at weight loss should be implemented to improve the quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Conducta Sexual/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estado Funcional , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Turquía
12.
Gynecol Oncol ; 157(2): 323-328, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32253046

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Given the disparity that exists in enrollment of minorities to oncology clinical trials, the objective of our study was to assess whether race is associated with willingness to participate in gynecologic oncology clinical trials in a rural Southern academic medicine setting. Our secondary aim was to determine whether willingness to participate is impacted by an educational intervention. METHODS: A single institution prospective survey study was performed at an academic medical center. Women presenting to the gynecologic oncology clinic with a current or prior diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy were approached to participate. The validated Attitudes to Randomized Trials Questionnaire (ARTQ) assessed willingness to participate in clinical trials. Relevant demographic and clinical data were abstracted. Characteristics were compared between those willing and unwilling to participate in clinical trials with a chi-square test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous data. RESULTS: We enrolled 156 participants (50% White, 50% non-White) from May 2017 to January 2018. The minority group included 35% non-Hispanic Black, 9% Hispanic, 4% Asian, and 2% other. Median age was 63 years with endometrial cancer being the most common diagnosis (48%). On initial screen, only 35% were willing to participate in a clinical trial. Willingness to participate did not differ between race, age, marital status, education level, cancer type, stage, or mode of treatment. Rates improved to 82% after being provided additional educational information. Following education, White women and those with more education were significantly more willing to participate in clinical trials than their minority and less educated counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Willingness to participate improved among all sub-categories following an educational intervention. The increase in willingness was less robust among racial and ethnic minorities, suggesting that different tools are needed for recruitment of minorities to gynecologic oncology clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/etnología , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Etnicidad/psicología , Grupos Minoritarios/psicología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/psicología , Anciano , Asiático/psicología , Población Negra/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca/psicología
13.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 18(1): 221, 2020 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32650776

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI) and quality of life among endometrial cancer survivors. METHODS: Women diagnosed with endometrioid endometrial cancer at the Slovakian university hospital between January 2010 and December 2018 were identified. Three hundred ninety women diagnosed with endometrial cancer were invited to participate. Quality of life was measured using the EORTC (European Organisation for Reseach and Treatment of Cancer) quality of life questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-EN24). Univariate and multiple regression analyses were used to determine associations between BMI and quality-of-life outcome variables. T-test was used to determine differences between groups. RESULTS: 337 (95.2%) women completed the questionnaire. 131 (38.8%) were pre-obese, 111 (32.9%) were class I and II obese and 29 (8.6%) were class III obese. Women with highher BMI experienced poorer physical, emotional and social functioning compared to normal weignt and pre-obese pacients (p <  0.05). Class I-III obese women had significantly more lymphoedema (59% v. 41%, p = 0.048) and dyspnea (73% v. 27%, p = 0.029), and experienced more fatigue (68% v, 32%, p = 0.036) and pain (65% v. 35%, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Class I-III obesity was associated with poorer quality of life in endometrial cancer survivors. Increasing BMI was inversely associated with QoL. Pre-obese and obese patients should be informed about greater incidence of pain, fatigue and dyspnea. Lifestyle changes (e.g., dietary interventions, physical activity) might reduce obesity and improve quality of life among endometrial cancer survivors.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Obesidad Mórbida/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Eslovaquia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(11): 5479-5489, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32170440

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) has been reported to be frequent and increasing in the general population and among cancer survivors. Very few studies have investigated the use of CAM among long-term endometrial cancer survivors. To address this gap in evidence, this qualitative study aimed to understand the use of CAM and factors motivating the use among long-term survivors of endometrial cancer. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer 7-10 years previously, to understand their CAM use and its impact on their wellbeing. Thematic analysis was performed by two researchers to extract the most relevant quotes related to CAM products, practices, and practitioners. RESULTS: All 17 women interviewed used some type of CAM practices, practitioners, or products, specifically 94% concentrated on their diet, 88% focused on their exercise, 59% used a CAM product, 53% visited a CAM practitioner, and 18% used a CAM psychological approach. The main motivators for CAM use included to reduce physical and psychological symptoms, and to stop or reduce medications. Women reported a lack of lifestyle advice from their traditional medical healthcare team which they therefore tried to obtain from other sources. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest CAM practices, practitioners, or products form an important part of women's healthcare options and are commonly used by long-term endometrial cancer survivors. Our data can be of importance to health care professionals and hospitals, as it reflects an unfulfilled need among cancer survivors that does not currently appear to be met by their traditional healthcare team.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Terapias Complementarias/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
15.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(5): 2311-2319, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31478164

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Incidence and mortality rates of uterine cancer are increasing and, obesity, which is also rising, has been associated with uterine cancer development and mortality. A recent study found that poor sleep quality is common among endometrial cancer survivors and those with obesity had more sleep disturbances than those having normal weight. However, it is unclear if higher levels of obesity (Class III, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2), which are rising rapidly, are differentially associated with sleep as well as depression and quality of life in endometrial cancer survivors. METHODS: We evaluated sleep, depression, and quality of life in 100 Stage I endometrial cancer survivors with obesity seeking weight loss enrolled in a lifestyle intervention (NCT01870947) at baseline. RESULTS: The average age was 60 years and mean BMI was 42.1 kg/m2 with 58% having a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Most survivors (72.3%) had poor sleep quality and most (71.2%) reported sleeping < 7 h/night. Survivors with class III compared with class I obesity had significantly more sleep disturbances and daytime dysfunction; and, those with poor sleep had higher depression and lower quality of life. Survivors with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 (~ 25%) had the highest levels of depression and lowest physical and emotional well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal that endometrial cancer survivors with class III compared with class I obesity have poorer sleep quality, higher depression, and lower quality of life. Given the rising rates of obesity and uterine cancer mortality, interventions to combat both obesity and poor sleep are needed.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Obesidad/psicología , Obesidad/terapia , Sueño/fisiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Depresión , Neoplasias Endometriales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/etiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/psicología , Pérdida de Peso , Programas de Reducción de Peso
16.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 30(6): 813-818, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32385051

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in endometrial cancer is gaining ground. However, patient views on this new technique are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine factors important to patients and gynecologists when considering SLN mapping in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS: We performed a vignette study. Patients who underwent a total hysterectomy for low- or intermediate-risk endometrial cancer between 2012 and 2015 were invited. Dutch gynecologists specializing in gynecologic oncology were also invited. We based the selection for attributes in the vignettes on literature and interviews: risk of complications of SLN mapping; chance of finding a metastasis; survival gain; risk of complications after radiotherapy; operation time; and hospital of surgery (travel time). We developed a questionnaire with 18 hypothetical scenarios. Each attribute level varied and for each scenario, participants were asked how strongly they would prefer SLN on a scale from 1 to 7. The strength of preference for each scenario was analyzed using linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: A total of 38% of patients (41/108) and 33% of gynecologists (42/126) participated in the study. Overall, they had a preference for SLN. The mean preference for patients was 4.29 (95% CI 3.72 to 4.85) and 4.39 (95% CI 3.99 to 4.78) for gynecologists. Patients' preferences increased from 3.4 in the case of no survival gain to 4.9 in the case of 3-year survival gain (P<0.05) and it decreased when travel time increased to >60 min (-0.4, P=0.024), or with an increased risk of complications after adjuvant radiotherapy (-0.6, P=0.002). For gynecologists all attributes except travel time were important. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients and gynecologists were in favor of SLN mapping in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. Most important to patients were survival gain, travel time, and complication risk after adjuvant radiotherapy. These preferences should be taken into account when counseling about SLN mapping.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/psicología , Anciano , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 30(2): 187-192, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843871

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Some experts have argued that obesity-related malignancies such as endometrial cancer are a "teachable moment" that lead to meaningful changes in health behaviors. It is unclear if endometrial cancer survivors lose weight following treatment. Our goal with this investigation was to evaluate post-treatment changes in body mass index (BMI) and attitudes towards health behaviors in endometrial cancer survivors. METHODS: Incident endometrial cancer cases undergoing surgery between 2009-2015 were identified in the Marketscan Commercial database and linked with BMI data and health behavior questionnaires from the Marketscan Health Risk Assessment database. Patients were excluded for insufficient BMI data. Standard statistical methods, including the two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test, χ2 test, and McNemar's test, were used. RESULTS: 655 patients with a median age of 54 (IQR 49-58) were identified and analyzed. Median duration of follow-up was 595 days (IQR 360-1091). Mean pre- and post-treatment BMI was 35.5 kg/m2 (median 35.0; IQR 27.0-42.3) and 35.6 kg/m2 (median 34.3; IQR 28.0-42.0), respectively. Median BMI change in the entire cohort was 0 kg/m2 (IQR -1.0 to 2.0). Weight gain (n=302; 46.1%) or no change in weight (n=106; 16.2%) was seen in most patients. Among the 302 patients who gained weight, the mean pre-treatment BMI was 34.0 kg/m2 and mean increase was 2.8 kg/m2 (median 2.0; IQR 1.0-3.4). Among the 247 cases who lost weight, the mean pre-treatment BMI was 38.6 kg/m2 and mean decrease was 3.2 kg/m2 (median 2.0; IQR 1.0-4.0). No pre- to post-treatment differences were observed in health behavior questionnaires regarding intention to better manage their diet, exercise more, or lose weight. DISCUSSION: Most endometrial cancer survivors gain weight or maintain the same weight following treatment. No post-treatment changes in attitudes regarding weight-related behaviors were observed. The systematic delivery of evidence-based weight loss interventions should be a priority for survivors of endometrial cancer.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pérdida de Peso
18.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol ; 98(1): 1-5, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31518506

RESUMEN

This study analyzed risk factors for anxiety and depression in 714 patients who received surgery for endometrial cancer. Our data indicate that the incidence of postoperative anxiety and depression in 714 patients with endometrial cancer was 15.55% and 32.77%, respectively. Univariate and logistic regression analysis showed postoperative pain (odds ratio (OR) = 3.166, P = 0.000) and combined liver disease (OR = 2.318, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative anxiety. Additionally, CD4+/CD8+ (OR = 0.513, P = 0.042) and natural killer (NK) cell ratios (OR = 0.692, P = 0.021) were independent protective factors for postoperative anxiety. As for depression, low literacy (OR = 1.943, P = 0.042), postoperative pain (OR = 2.671, P = 0.001), high clinical stage (OR = 3.469, P = 0.009), and combined liver disease (OR = 4.865, P = 0.000) were independent risk factors for postoperative depression. CD4+/CD8+ (OR = 0.628, P = 0.002) and NK cell ratio (OR = 0.710, P = 0.013) were independent protective factors for postoperative depression. In conclusion, patients with endometrial cancer have a higher incidence of postoperative anxiety and depression where postoperative pain, liver disease, and decreased immune function are risk factors for both anxiety and depression in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/etiología , Pueblo Asiatico/psicología , Depresión/etiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
19.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 99(9): 1238-1245, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32170875

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aims of the study were to evaluate quality of life, cosmetic results and surgical outcomes of robotic single-site and robotic multiport total laparoscopic hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping in women treated for low-risk endometrial cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study is a prospective, multicenter, case-control study conducted at Ospedale Santa Chiara in Trento and Novara and Pavia University Hospitals. Seventy-six consecutive patients with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of low-risk endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia who between January 2017 and January 2019 had undergone robotic total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sentinel lymph node mapping were included. Data on surgical outcomes, quality of life and cosmetic results were prospectively collected and analyzed based on the surgical approach with robotic single-site vs robotic multiport assistance. Patients' clinical characteristics, intra-operative parameters, sentinel lymph node mapping results and postoperative findings were prospectively recorded. Clinical follow up was performed 4 weeks and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Fifty-one patients underwent a robotic multiport procedure and 25 patients a robotic single-site surgery. RESULTS: There was one significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient characteristics: mean body mass index (BMI) in the multiport group was 29 kg/m2 vs 24.8 kg/m2 in the single-site group (P value <.001). After univariate and multivariate analysis on intraoperative and postoperative findings, a shorter surgical time was observed in the single-site cohort than in the multiport group (148.7 vs 158.2 minutes, P value .0182). BMI also had a significant effect on surgical time (P = .022). No differences were seen in terms of sentinel lymph node detection: the bilateral detection rate was 96.1% for multiport (66.7% bilateral, 29.4% monolateral) and 96% for single-site (76% bilateral, 20% monolateral) procedures. No differences between the two approaches were identified with regard to postoperative complications, pain, cosmetic results or quality of life comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of low-risk endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia with total hysterectomy and sentinel lymph node mapping, the robotic single-port approach is comparable to the multiport procedure in terms of intraoperative and postoperative findings, and has an advantage in terms of shorter surgical times. Further studies are required to identify possible differences in quality of life and cosmetic results.


Asunto(s)
Imagen Corporal/psicología , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Histerectomía/psicología , Laparoscopía/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/psicología , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Cancer ; 125(5): 788-797, 2019 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30500067

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In efforts to improve the implementation of survivorship care plans (SCPs), the authors assessed whether the impact of SCPs on patient-reported outcomes differed between patients with an information-seeking coping style (monitoring) versus those with an information-avoiding coping style (blunting). METHODS: In the Registration System Oncological Gynecology (ROGY) Care Trial, 12 hospitals in the Netherlands were randomized to deliver SCP care or usual care. All patients with newly diagnosed endometrial and ovarian cancer in the SCP care arm received an SCP that was generated automatically by their oncology provider through the web-based ROGY registration system. Outcomes (satisfaction with information provision and care, illness perceptions, and health care use) were measured directly after initial treatment and after 6, 12, and 24 months. Information coping style was measured at 12 months after initial treatment. RESULTS: Among patients who had a monitoring coping style (N = 123), those in the SCP care arm reported higher satisfaction with information provision (mean score: 73.9 vs 63.9, respectively; P = .04) and care (mean score: 74.5 vs 69.2, respectively; P = .03) compared with those in the usual care arm. Among patients who had a blunting coping style (N = 102), those in the SCP care arm reported a higher impact of the disease on life (mean score: 5.0 vs 4.5, respectively; P = .02) and a higher emotional impact of the disease (mean score: 5.4 vs 4.2, respectively; P = .01) compared with those in the usual care arm. CONCLUSIONS: SCPs may be beneficial for patients who desire information about their disease, whereas SCPs may be less beneficial for patients who avoid medical information, suggesting a need for tailored SCP delivery to improve survivorship care.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Neoplasias Ováricas/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda